2023-04-262022/23:UbU6 · p.9UbUEducation
Special subjects and areas of knowledge
Teaching in specific subjects and knowledge areas
What's at stake: The outcome affects how much targeted support is given to reading and writing development beyond the existing curriculum requirements, which in turn concerns pupils' ability to achieve good learning outcomes, particularly in reading.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the current framework for teaching specific subjects and knowledge areas, including the requirements of the curricula, is sufficient, or whether further targeted efforts to promote reading are needed beyond the existing framework.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee notes that primary and lower-secondary school subjects, including modern languages and mother-tongue instruction, are already listed in the Education Act and that each subject has a syllabus within the curriculum, which has recently been revised. It emphasises that the curriculum and syllabuses are the most important governing documents for schools' work and sees no reason to propose changes to the current framework. The committee therefore rejects the motions, including those calling for further reading-promotion efforts.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 10 (S)
The reservation (S) wants further reading-promotion measures to be carried out, referring to earlier initiatives that made reading aloud part of preschool activities and funded professional development for preschool and school teachers in reading and writing instruction through the Reading Boost programme, arguing that continuing to strengthen reading and writing ability is crucial for learning outcomes to keep improving.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 10 by S.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have held
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: LLiberalerna
Ja 151–92Ja 137–106
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Abstain 0/0/20/4 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| S | No | No 0/92/0/15 | match | confidence: medium | derived |
| MP | No | Abstain 0/0/14/4 | differs | confidence: high | explicit |
| C | No | Abstain 0/0/21/3 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 14/0/0/2 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: medium | explicit |
| KD | No | Yes 15/0/0/4 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| M | No | Yes 58/0/0/10 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| SD | No | Yes 64/0/0/9 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2022/23:96 by Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M), 2022/23:181 by Märta Stenevi et al. (MP) item 5, 2022/23:491 by Markus Wiechel and Alexander Christiansson (both SD) items 3-6, 8 and 9, 2022/23:571 by Annette Rydell (S), 2022/23:856 by Anders W Jonsson et al. (C) item 5, 2022/23:864 by Ulrika Liljeberg et al. (C) item 25, 2022/23:884 by Muharrem Demirok et al. (C) item 49, 2022/23:978 by Angelika Bengtsson et al. (SD) item 10, 2022/23:1007 by Mikael Eskilandersson et al. (SD) item 1, 2022/23:1014 by Thomas Morell et al. (SD) item 82, 2022/23:1024 by Patrick Reslow et al. (SD) item 2, 2022/23:1071 by Alexandra Anstrell (M), 2022/23:1209 by Beatrice Timgren (SD) item 2, 2022/23:1217 by Nooshi Dadgostar et al. (V) item 25, 2022/23:1224 by Vasiliki Tsouplaki et al. (V) items 9 and 10, 2022/23:1258 by Camilla Hansén et al. (MP) items 1-4, 2022/23:1351 by Sofie Eriksson et al. (S), 2022/23:1561 by Ingela Nylund Watz and Denis Begic (both S), 2022/23:1856 by Sten Bergheden (M), 2022/23:1995 by Johanna Rantsi (M), 2022/23:2081 by Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M), 2022/23:2095 by Amanda Lind et al. (MP) items 9-11, 2022/23:2110 by Per Bolund et al. (MP) item 56, 2022/23:2128 by Åsa Westlund et al. (S) item 25, 2022/23:2220 by Eric Palmqvist (SD) items 1-3 and 2022/23:2248 by Runar Filper (SD).
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2022/23:96 av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M), 2022/23:181 av Märta Stenevi m.fl. (MP) yrkande 5, 2022/23:491 av Markus Wiechel och Alexander Christiansson (båda SD) yrkandena 3-6, 8 och 9, 2022/23:571 av Annette Rydell (S), 2022/23:856 av Anders W Jonsson m.fl. (C) yrkande 5, 2022/23:864 av Ulrika Liljeberg m.fl. (C) yrkande 25, 2022/23:884 av Muharrem Demirok m.fl. (C) yrkande 49, 2022/23:978 av Angelika Bengtsson m.fl. (SD) yrkande 10, 2022/23:1007 av Mikael Eskilandersson m.fl. (SD) yrkande 1, 2022/23:1014 av Thomas Morell m.fl. (SD) yrkande 82, 2022/23:1024 av Patrick Reslow m.fl. (SD) yrkande 2, 2022/23:1071 av Alexandra Anstrell (M), 2022/23:1209 av Beatrice Timgren (SD) yrkande 2, 2022/23:1217 av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V) yrkande 25, 2022/23:1224 av Vasiliki Tsouplaki m.fl. (V) yrkandena 9 och 10, 2022/23:1258 av Camilla Hansén m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 1-4, 2022/23:1351 av Sofie Eriksson m.fl. (S), 2022/23:1561 av Ingela Nylund Watz och Denis Begic (båda S), 2022/23:1856 av Sten Bergheden (M), 2022/23:1995 av Johanna Rantsi (M), 2022/23:2081 av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M), 2022/23:2095 av Amanda Lind m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 9-11, 2022/23:2110 av Per Bolund m.fl. (MP) yrkande 56, 2022/23:2128 av Åsa Westlund m.fl. (S) yrkande 25, 2022/23:2220 av Eric Palmqvist (SD) yrkandena 1-3 och 2022/23:2248 av Runar Filper (SD).
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag said no to the 118 proposals in motions received during the general motion period 2022. The proposals deal with, among other things, school values, school safety, special subjects and areas of knowledge, assessment and national tests, educational materials and school libraries, mother tongue and minority languages. The Riksdag refers to existing regulations, ongoing work and measures taken.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants students to retain influence and co-determination over school order rules. (S) — Reservation 10
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan points out closed school libraries as part of culture's depletion and demands that the library law be sharpened so that libraries exist in smaller places as well.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan points out closed school libraries as part of culture's depletion and demands that the library law be sharpened so that libraries exist in smaller places as well. More reading-promoting initiatives in preschool and school align with this and with the requirement for early interventions for children struggling. Reading-promoting initiatives are not specifically mentioned in the plan, so the conclusion is derived.
Original (Swedish)
Planen pekar ut nedlagda skolbibliotek som en del av kulturens utarmning och kräver att bibliotekslagen skärps så att bibliotek finns även på mindre orter. Fler läsfrämjande insatser i förskola och skola ligger i linje med detta och med kravet på tidiga insatser för barn som har det kämpigt. Just läsfrämjande insatser namnges inte i planen, så slutsatsen är härledd.
- strengthen the library lawdecisive»bibliotekslagen ska skärpas så att bibliotek även måste finnas på mindre orter,« (party programme ↗)“the library law should be sharpened so that libraries must also exist in smaller places,”
- school libraries are closed»Även kulturen och idrotten har utarmats när skolbibliotek läggs ned, simskolan blivit dyrare och biografer finns på färre orter.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Culture and sports have also been depleted when school libraries close, swimming lessons have become more expensive and cinemas exist in fewer places.”
- early interventions for children»Vänsterpartiet vill se fler lärare, tidigare insatser för barn som har det kämpigt och förbättrad tillgång till lärande genom hela livet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Left Party wants to see more teachers, earlier interventions for children struggling and improved access to learning throughout life.”
- more resources to schools»Det krävs satsningar inte bara på undervisning utan också på elevhälsa, specialpedagoger, fritidsverksamhet och socialt stöd.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Investments are needed not only in teaching but also in student health, special education teachers, recreational activities and social support.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan gives school libraries a central role for increased literacy and requires that all students reach curriculum goals when leaving basic school.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan gives school libraries a central role for increased literacy and requires that all students reach curriculum goals when leaving basic school. More reading-promoting activities and skills development in reading and writing development directly serve that commitment. The plan also sees knowledge's accessibility as crucial for breaking class patterns, and wants libraries to be free of charge.
Original (Swedish)
Planen ger skolbiblioteken en central roll för ökad läskunnighet och kräver att alla elever når läroplanens mål när de lämnar grundskolan. Fler läsfrämjande insatser och kompetensutveckling i läs- och skrivutveckling tjänar direkt det åtagandet. Planen ser också kunskapens tillgänglighet som avgörande för att bryta klassmönster, och vill att biblioteken är avgiftsfria.
- literacy as goaldecisive»Skolbiblioteken har en central roll att spela för ökad läskunnighet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“School libraries have a central role to play for increased literacy.”
- all students shall reach goals»Alla elever ska ha nått läroplanens mål när de går ut grundskolan.« (party programme ↗)“All students shall have reached the curriculum's goals when they leave basic school.”
- knowledge breaks class patterns»Att öppna dörrarna till kunskap för alla är centralt för att bryta klassmönstren.« (party programme ↗)“Opening doors to knowledge for all is central to breaking class patterns.”
- free libraries»Biblioteken ska vara avgiftsfria. Musikskolor och kulturskolor ska vara tillgängliga för alla barn.« (party programme ↗)“Libraries shall be free of charge. Music schools and cultural schools shall be accessible to all children.”
The plan wants to strengthen libraries in their work for reading and invest in children's culture in schools with trained staff in all school libraries, and develop the reading, writing and numeracy guarantee so that interventions come in time.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to strengthen libraries in their work for reading and invest in children's culture in schools with trained staff in all school libraries, and develop the reading, writing and numeracy guarantee so that interventions come in time. The party programme sees school libraries as central resources for schools' pedagogical work. More reading-promoting efforts are therefore directly supported.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill stärka biblioteken i deras arbete för läsning och satsa på barns kultur i skolan med utbildad personal på alla skolbibliotek, samt utveckla läs-, skriv- och räknegarantin så att insatser kommer i tid. Partiprogrammet ser skolbiblioteken som centrala resurser för skolans pedagogiska arbete. Fler läsfrämjande insatser stöds därför direkt.
- libraries' reading-promoting workdecisive»stärka biblioteken i deras viktiga arbete för läsning och demokrati.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“strengthen libraries in their important work for reading and democracy.”
- trained staff in school libraries»satsa på barns kultur i skolan, med utbildad personal på alla skolbibliotek och estetiska ämnen i alla gymnasieprogram.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“invest in children's culture in schools, with trained staff in all school libraries and aesthetic subjects in all upper secondary programmes.”
- literacy and numeracy guarantee in time»stärka och utveckla läsa-skriva-räkna-garantin för att fler barn med funktionsnedsättning ska få insatser i tid.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“strengthen and develop the reading, writing and numeracy guarantee so that more children with disabilities get support in time.”
- school libraries as pedagogical resource»centrala resurser för skolans pedagogiska arbete.« (party programme ↗)“central resources for schools' pedagogical work.”
flags: citat_migrerat
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The party programme establishes that basic skills such as reading and writing must be prioritised because they are the prerequisite for all other learning, and the election manifesto makes improved school results a main priority.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme establishes that basic skills such as reading and writing must be prioritised because they are the prerequisite for all other learning, and the election manifesto makes improved school results a main priority. Initiatives promoting reading in preschool and school are precisely that tool. The plan also emphasises that school must start from each child's needs, not least in early language learning.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår fast att grundläggande färdigheter som att läsa och skriva måste prioriteras eftersom de är förutsättningen för allt annat lärande, och valmanifestet gör förbättrade skolresultat till en huvudprioritering. Läsfrämjande insatser i förskola och skola är precis det verktyget. Planen betonar dessutom att skolan ska utgå från varje barns behov, inte minst i den tidiga språkinlärningen.
- early reading skills prioritiseddecisive»Att tidigt ge grundläggande färdigheter - som att kunna läsa, skriva och räkna - måste prioriteras« (party programme ↗)“Giving basic skills early - such as being able to read, write, and count - must be prioritised”
- school results first»Att förbättra skolresultaten måste vara en huvudprioritering.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Improving school results must be a main priority.”
- the child's needs in language learning»Det är viktigt att utgå från varje barns behov, inte minst för den tidiga språkinlärningen.« (party programme ↗)“It is important to start from each child's needs, not least for early language learning.”
- education's value»Bildning breddar våra horisonter, ökar vår frihet och egenmakt« (party programme ↗)“Education broadens our horizons, increases our freedom and self-determination”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan makes reading and reading ability an explicit priority throughout schooling and requires a major initiative on real textbooks and that all pupils read literary classics.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan makes reading and reading ability an explicit priority throughout schooling and requires a major initiative on real textbooks and that all pupils read literary classics. More reading-promoting initiatives thereby align with the plan's knowledge mandate. The plan further means that curricula need to be revised with greater focus on facts and knowledge, which speaks against the committee's conclusion that the regulations are sufficient.
Original (Swedish)
Planen gör läsning och läsförmåga till en uttalad prioritering i hela skolgången och kräver en storsatsning på riktiga skolböcker samt att alla elever läser skönlitterära klassiker. Fler läsfrämjande insatser ligger därmed i linje med planens kunskapsuppdrag. Planen menar dessutom att läroplanerna behöver revideras med större fokus på fakta och kunskap, vilket talar mot utskottets slutsats att regelverket är tillräckligt.
- reading highly prioritizeddecisive»Läsandet ska vara högt prioriterat i skolans alla stadier.« (party programme ↗)“Reading shall be highly prioritized in all stages of school.”
- major initiative on teaching materials»En storsatsning på läromedel måste göras så att eleverna får riktiga skolböcker och landets lärare slipper stå och kopiera.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“A major initiative on teaching materials must be made so that pupils get real textbooks and the country's teachers avoid having to stand and copy.”
- classics for all pupils»Alla barn och elever ska få läsa både svenska och internationella skönlitterära klassiker i skolan.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“All children and pupils shall get to read both Swedish and international literary classics in school.”
- revised curricula»Läroplanerna ska revideras och få ett större fokus på fakta och kunskap.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Curricula shall be revised and get a greater focus on facts and knowledge.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan makes the basic skills of reading, writing and arithmetic a priority area in primary school and places on the school the responsibility to give pupils the support their needs require.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan makes the basic skills of reading, writing and arithmetic a priority area in primary school and places on the school the responsibility to give pupils the support their needs require. More reading promotion initiatives are a direct means for precisely this commitment, and the plan also values reading's place in education. However, the plan says nothing about the committee's objection that subjects and syllabuses are already regulated.
Original (Swedish)
Planen gör basfärdigheterna att läsa, skriva och räkna till prioriterat område i grundskolan och lägger på skolan ansvaret att ge eleverna det stöd deras behov kräver. Fler läsfrämjande insatser är ett direkt medel för just detta åtagande, och planen värnar dessutom läsningens plats i bildningen. Planen säger däremot inget om utskottets invändning att ämnen och kursplaner redan är reglerade.
- basic skills prioritiseddecisive»som att kunna läsa, skriva och räkna« (party programme ↗)“such as being able to read, write and calculate”
- school's responsibility for support»Skolan har ett ansvar för att eleverna får« (party programme ↗)“The school has a responsibility to ensure that pupils receive”
- reading's value protected»Vi vill värna den unika plats för läsning« (party programme ↗)“We want to value the unique place for reading”
- good school prioritised»BRA SKOLA« (2022 manifesto ↗)“GOOD SCHOOL”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan's heaviest school commitment is that all children shall learn good Swedish early, with mandatory language monitoring at three years, language preschool for deficient language development and expanded teaching time in primary school.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's heaviest school commitment is that all children shall learn good Swedish early, with mandatory language monitoring at three years, language preschool for deficient language development and expanded teaching time in primary school. Reading and writing ability are themselves the prerequisite for the knowledge school the plan requires, and the counter-proposal's demand for continued reading-promotion initiatives aligns with this. Reading-promotion initiatives are not mentioned explicitly, so the position is derived from language and knowledge commitments.
Original (Swedish)
Planens tyngsta skolåtagande är att alla barn ska lära sig bra svenska tidigt, med obligatorisk språkuppföljning vid tre år, språkförskola vid bristande språkutveckling och utökad undervisningstid i lågstadiet. Läs- och skrivförmågan är själva förutsättningen för den kunskapsskola planen kräver, och motförslagets krav på fortsatta läsfrämjande insatser ligger i linje med detta. Läsfrämjande insatser nämns inte uttryckligen, varför ställningstagandet härleds ur språk- och kunskapsåtagandena.
- Swedish language decisivedecisive»De enskilt viktigaste åtgärderna för att bryta segregationen handlar om kvaliteten i undervisningen och det svenska språket.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The single most important measures for breaking segregation are about quality in teaching and the Swedish language.”
- early language initiatives»Införa obligatorisk språkförskola för barn som visar en bristande språkutveckling« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Introduce mandatory language preschool for children showing deficient language development”
- early language monitoring»Införa obligatorisk språkuppföljning vid 3 års ålder för att upptäcka barn som inte kan tala svenska« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Introduce mandatory language monitoring at age 3 to identify children who cannot speak Swedish”
- more teaching time»Utöka undervisningstiden med en timme om dagen i lågstadiet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Expand teaching time by one hour per day in primary school”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan puts a knowledge-focused school with proven pedagogy at the centre and particularly emphasises that children's linguistic ability is fundamental.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan puts a knowledge-focused school with proven pedagogy at the centre and particularly emphasises that children's linguistic ability is fundamental. More reading-promotion initiatives are in line with this and with the requirement that the Swedish language is prioritised in childcare. The plan, however, says nothing about whether the recently revised curriculum is already sufficient, but in substance it supports measures that strengthen reading and writing ability.
Original (Swedish)
Planen sätter en kunskapsfokuserad skola med beprövad pedagogik i centrum och lyfter särskilt att barnens språkliga förmåga är grundläggande. Fler läsfrämjande insatser ligger i linje med detta och med kravet att svenska språket prioriteras i barnomsorgen. Planen säger däremot inget om huruvida den nyligen reviderade läroplanen redan räcker, men i sak stöder den åtgärder som stärker läs- och skrivförmågan.
- knowledge-focused schooldecisive»Sverigedemokraterna vill återupprätta en kunskapsfokuserad skola.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden Democrats want to restore a knowledge-focused school.”
- early linguistic ability»Att förskolebarnen utvecklar sin språkliga förmåga är grundläggande för en lyckad övergång till förskoleklassen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“That preschool children develop their linguistic ability is fundamental for a successful transition to kindergarten class.”
- Swedish language prioritised»Prioritera svenska språket inom barnomsorgen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Prioritise the Swedish language in childcare”
- clearer knowledge goals»Läroplaner ska kompletteras med tydligare kunskapsmål.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Curricula shall be supplemented with clearer knowledge goals.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2022/23:UbU6)
- Committee report full text (HA01UbU6)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2022/23:1007 — Krafttag mot överskuldsättning av Mikael Eskilandersson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2022/23:1014 — Ett konkurrenskraftigt svenskt väginfrastruktursystem av Thomas Morell m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2022/23:1023 — En förskola i världsklass av Patrick Reslow m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2022/23:1024 — En grundskola i världsklass av Patrick Reslow m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2022/23:1071 — Privatekonomi i alla skolformer av Alexandra Anstrell (M)
- Motion 2022/23:1191 — Ungdomsförbund i skolan av Teresa Carvalho m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2022/23:1209 — Programmering som ett eget obligatoriskt ämne av Beatrice Timgren (SD)
- Motion 2022/23:1214 — Åtgärder för de nationella minoriteterna och minoritetsspråken av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2022/23:1217 — Åtgärder med syfte att stoppa våldskulturen av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2022/23:1224 — Idrottspolitiska frågor av Vasiliki Tsouplaki m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2022/23:1226 — Vissa kulturpolitiska frågor av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2022/23:1258 — Mer kunskap om miljö, hållbarhet och biologisk mångfald i skolan av Camilla Hansén m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2022/23:1351 — Älvdalska av Sofie Eriksson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2022/23:1434 — Höjd ambition på fritidshemmen av Louise Thunström och Paula Holmqvist (båda S)
- Motion 2022/23:1449 — Skolans arbete mot hedersrelaterat våld och förtryck av Mattias Jonsson och Adnan Dibrani (båda S)
- Motion 2022/23:1466 — Lagstiftning om bemannade skolbibliotek av Amanda Lind m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2022/23:1474 — Politik för de nationella minoriteterna av Amanda Lind m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2022/23:1475 — Konfessionella inslag i skolan av Petter Löberg (S)
- Motion 2022/23:1561 — Undervisning om folkmordet seyfo av Ingela Nylund Watz och Denis Begic (båda S)
- Motion 2022/23:1575 — Skolavslutning och firanden av högtider med konfessionella inslag i kyrkolokaler av Ingemar Kihlström (KD)
Source: The Swedish Parliament