2023-06-072022/23:JuU23 · p.1JuUJustice
Security Guards' Powers
Ordningsvakter's power to body-search and transport people taken into custody
What's at stake: The proposal could shorten waiting times and free up police resources, since a police officer no longer always has to attend the scene for identification or transport, but it also concerns intrusive measures against individuals - body searches and transporting people in custody - which raises questions about legal safeguards and personal integrity when the power shifts from the police to ordningsvakter.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether ordningsvakter, in addition to being able to take intoxicated or disorderly people into custody under the Intoxicated Persons Act and the Police Act, should also gain the power to body-search people to establish their identity and to transport people taken into custody, or whether these tasks should remain a police responsibility.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee notes that the proposal reduces waiting times for both the individual and ordningsvakter and frees up resources at the Police Authority, and stresses that while this is an intrusive measure, the bill clearly specifies the situations in which an ordningsvakt may take a person into custody and that it is the Police Authority that decides whether transport can suitably be handed to ordningsvakter; the committee therefore backs the proposal for expanded powers, including body searches to establish identity, and rejects the motions.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 1 (V, MP)
The reservation (V, MP) considers that the Riksdag should reject the parts of the bill that give ordningsvakter the power to body-search people to establish their identity and to transport people taken into custody due to intoxication or certain public-order disturbances, with the reasons set out in a separate statement.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: adopting the government's legislative proposal and rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by V, MP.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | No 0/21/0/3 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| S | Yes | Yes 94/0/0/13 | follows the plan | confidence: low | derived |
| MP | No | No 0/15/0/3 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| C | No | Yes 21/0/0/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| L | Yes | Yes 14/0/0/2 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| KD | Yes | Yes 16/0/0/3 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| M | Yes | Yes 60/0/0/8 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| SD | Yes | Yes 63/0/0/9 | follows the plan | confidence: high | explicit |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag adopts the Government's proposal for 1. a law amending the Act (1976:511) on the detention of intoxicated persons etc., 2. a law amending the Police Act (1984:387). Thereby the Riksdag approves Government Bill 2022/23:91 points 3 and 4 and rejects the motions 2022/23:2368 by Gudrun Nordborg et al. (V) points 2 and 3 and 2022/23:2375 by Bassem Nasr et al. (MP) points 2 and 3.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen antar regeringens förslag till 1. lag om ändring i lagen (1976:511) om omhändertagande av berusade personer m.m., 2. lag om ändring i polislagen (1984:387). Därmed bifaller riksdagen proposition 2022/23:91 punkterna 3 och 4 samt avslår motionerna 2022/23:2368 av Gudrun Nordborg m.fl. (V) yrkandena 2 och 3 samt 2022/23:2375 av Bassem Nasr m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 2 och 3.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag said yes to the Government's proposal for a new law on security guards. The law is to create conditions for more flexible and increased use of security guards and give them expanded powers. According to the new legislation, security guards are to be permitted to help maintain public order and security or contribute to public safety. They are also to be given additional powers, for example to transport certain detained persons and destroy confiscated alcohol if the value is minor. The new rules enter into force on 1 January 2024.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants parliament to reject giving security guards the authority to conduct body searches for identification or to transport detained persons. (V, MP) — Reservation 1
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan protects personal integrity and a broad private sphere, and wants to address crime with an engaged criminal justice system and more police rather than with expanded coercive measures in other hands.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan protects personal integrity and a broad private sphere, and wants to address crime with an engaged criminal justice system and more police rather than with expanded coercive measures in other hands. It particularly warns against racism and excessive force against young people in poor areas and demands independent scrutiny of those authorized to use force. Not granting security guards the right to conduct body searches for identification or transport detained persons follows from this.
Original (Swedish)
Planen värnar den personliga integriteten och en bred privat sfär, och vill möta brottsligheten med ett närvarande rättsväsende och fler poliser snarare än med utvidgade tvångsmedel i andra händer. Den varnar särskilt för rasism och övervåld mot unga i fattiga områden och kräver oberoende granskning av dem som får utöva våld. Att inte ge ordningsvakter rätt att kroppsvisitera för identifiering eller transportera omhändertagna följer av detta.
- personal integrityweak support»Alla människor har rätt till en bred privat sfär« (party programme ↗)“All people have the right to a broad private sphere”
- risk of excessive forcedecisive»Många unga, särskilt med utländsk bakgrund, som bor i fattiga områden, utsätts även för rasism och övervåld från polisen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Many young people, especially with a foreign background, who live in poor areas, are also subjected to racism and excessive force by the police”
- scrutiny of those using force»oberoende system för att granska de yrkesgrupper, till exempel polisen« (party programme ↗)“independent system to scrutinize those professional groups, for example the police,”
- police not security guards»Kriminaliteten behöver mötas både med ett fungerande och närvarande rättssystem som fler patrullerande poliser« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Crime must be met both with a functioning and engaged criminal justice system with more patrolling police”
flags: citat_svagt
The plan's line is that society's full force shall be mobilised against criminality and that the justice system shall receive more tools and strengthened presence, which speaks against rejecting expanded powers that free up police resources.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's line is that society's full force shall be mobilised against criminality and that the justice system shall receive more tools and strengthened presence, which speaks against rejecting expanded powers that free up police resources. The party programme simultaneously requires that society responds clearly to crime, but also that personal integrity is protected, which makes the conclusion uncertain. Overall, the plan rejects the counter-proposal's demand not to grant the powers.
Original (Swedish)
Planens linje är att samhällets fulla kraft ska mobiliseras mot kriminaliteten och att rättsväsendet ska få fler verktyg och stärkt närvaro, vilket talar mot att avslå utökade befogenheter som frigör polisresurser. Partiprogrammet kräver samtidigt att samhället reagerar tydligt mot brott, men också att den personliga integriteten skyddas, vilket gör slutsatsen osäker. Sammantaget avvisar planen motförslagets krav på att inte ge befogenheterna.
- uncompromising crime fightingdecisive»Kampen mot kriminaliteten ska vara kompromisslös. Samhällets fulla kraft ska mobiliseras för att trycka tillbaka de kriminella, kapa återväxten in i kriminaliteten och öka tryggheten.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The fight against criminality shall be uncompromising. Society's full force shall be mobilised to push back the criminals, cut off the growth back into criminality and increase security.”
- more tools for police»Kraftigt öka antalet poliser på våra gator och torg. Vi vill säkra och stärka polisnärvaron i hela landet. Polisen behöver också fler verktyg, som bättre möjligheter till avlyssning och husrannsakan.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Significantly increase the number of police on our streets and squares. We want to ensure and strengthen police presence throughout the country. Police also need more tools, such as better opportunities for wiretapping and house searches.”
- clear response to crime»Samhället måste reagera tydligt mot brott och regelöverträdelser.« (party programme ↗)“Society must respond clearly to crime and violations of rules.”
- protection of personal integrity»Det är samhällets absoluta skyldighet att skydda friheten och den personliga integriteten« (party programme ↗)“It is society's absolute duty to protect freedom and personal integrity”
The plan opposes laws that involve disproportionate interference with personal integrity and states that crime-fighting must not occur at the expense of human rights.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan opposes laws that involve disproportionate interference with personal integrity and states that crime-fighting must not occur at the expense of human rights. Body searches for identity control and transport of persons in custody are precisely such coercive measures, and the plan's response to public order problems is more and better-paid police with citizen oversight, not expanded powers for security guards.
Original (Swedish)
Planen motsätter sig lagar som innebär oproportionerliga ingrepp i den personliga integriteten och slår fast att brottsbekämpning inte får ske på bekostnad av mänskliga rättigheter. Kroppsvisitation för identitetskontroll och transport av omhändertagna är just sådana tvångsingrepp, och planens svar på ordningsproblem är fler och bättre betalda poliser med medborgerlig insyn, inte utökade befogenheter för ordningsvakter.
- protection against integrity interferencedecisive»alla lagar som innebär oproportionerliga ingrepp i« (party programme ↗)“all laws that involve disproportionate interference in”
- crime-fighting within human rights»viktigt men ska inte ske på bekostnad av mänskliga« (party programme ↗)“important but must not occur at the expense of human”
- more police instead»se fler och bättre betalda poliser för att bekämpa den organiserade brottsligheten och för att motverka parallellsamhällen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“see more and better-paid police to combat organized crime and to counter parallel societies.”
- oversight of law enforcement activities»Det ska finnas god medborgerlig insyn i all« (party programme ↗)“There shall be good citizen oversight of all”
The plan's crucial commitment is to defend the rule of law and the individual's rights against the state and to reject invasive coercive measures, and all legislation should be tested against its impact on personal integrity.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's crucial commitment is to defend the rule of law and the individual's rights against the state and to reject invasive coercive measures, and all legislation should be tested against its impact on personal integrity. Body searches to establish identity and transport of detained persons are such invasive measures. The plan responds to the need for police presence with more police, not with expanded powers for security guards.
Original (Swedish)
Planens avgörande åtagande är att rättsstaten och individens rättigheter mot staten ska försvaras och att ingripande tvångsmedel avvisas, samt att all lagstiftning ska prövas mot sin påverkan på den personliga integriteten. Kroppsvisitation för att fastställa identitet och transport av omhändertagna är sådana ingripande åtgärder. Planen svarar på behovet av polisnärvaro med fler poliser, inte med utvidgade befogenheter för ordningsvakter.
- no to invasive coercive measuresdecisive»Rättsstaten och individens rättigheter gentemot staten måste försvaras. Vi säger därför nej till visitationszoner, kollektiv bestraffning, omvänd bevisbörda, anonyma vittnen, preventiv avlyssning och inskränkningar av religionsfriheten.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The rule of law and the individual's rights against the state must be defended. We therefore say no to search zones, collective punishment, reversed burden of proof, anonymous witnesses, preventive surveillance and restrictions on religious freedom.”
- integrity review of lawsweak support»All lagstiftning bör prövas mot dess påverkan på människors personliga integritet.« (party programme ↗)“All legislation should be tested against its impact on people's personal integrity.”
- police tasks to the police»Fler poliser ska finnas närvarande i vardagen, både i utsatta områden och på landsbygden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“More police should be present in everyday life, both in vulnerable areas and in rural areas.”
- state's monopoly on force»Staten är den enda enheten i samhället som får utöva tvång och våld.« (party programme ↗)“The state is the only entity in society that may exercise coercion and violence.”
flags: citat_svagt
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto wants to give law enforcement authorities more and more intrusive tools and achieve significantly increased police density; freeing police resources by having others perform transports and identity checks lies in that direction.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto wants to give law enforcement authorities more and more intrusive tools and achieve significantly increased police density; freeing police resources by having others perform transports and identity checks lies in that direction. The counter-proposal's requirement to deny security guards these powers thereby goes against the plan's direction. The plan's integrity principle constitutes a qualifying but not decisive objection, since the powers are limited and the police decide.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet vill ge de brottsbekämpande myndigheterna fler och mer ingripande verktyg och nå kraftigt ökad polistäthet; att frigöra polisresurser genom att andra får utföra transporter och identitetskontroller ligger i den linjen. Motförslagets krav att neka ordningsvakter dessa befogenheter går därmed emot planens inriktning. Planens integritetsprincip utgör en kvalificerande men inte avgörande invändning, eftersom befogenheterna är avgränsade och polisen beslutar.
- more tools for the justice systemdecisive»Avlyssning och andra hemliga tvångsmedel ska kunna användas både vid misstanke om fler brott än i dag och efter domstolsbeslut mot organiserade gängmedlemmar även utan konkret brottsmisstanke.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Wiretapping and other secret coercive measures shall be able to be used both when suspecting more crimes than today and after court decision against organized gang members even without concrete suspicion of crime.”
- more police resources for core tasks»Därför vill vi på sikt nå 33 000 poliser så att polistätheten blir minst lika hög som i övriga Europa.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Therefore we want in the long term to reach 33,000 police so that police density becomes at least as high as in the rest of Europe.”
- integrity protection as counterweight»Skyddet för den enskildes integritet ska stärkas.« (party programme ↗)“Protection for the individual's integrity shall be strengthened.”
- state responsibility for crime prevention»det är endast staten som ska bekämpa brott och ansvara för en fungerande rättsordning.« (party programme ↗)“it is only the state that shall combat crime and be responsible for a functioning legal order.”
The plan's key commitment is to clarify the police mandate so that police can concentrate on crime-fighting.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's key commitment is to clarify the police mandate so that police can concentrate on crime-fighting. Moving transports and identity checks to security guards frees up precisely such police resources, while the counter-proposal wants to prevent this. The plan's demand for strong protection of integrity argues for careful delimitation but not against the powers as such.
Original (Swedish)
Planens bärande åtagande är att renodla polisens uppdrag så att polisen kan koncentreras på brottsbekämpning. Att flytta transporter och identitetskontroll till ordningsvakter frigör just sådana polisresurser, medan motförslaget vill hindra detta. Planens krav på starkt integritetsskydd talar för noggrann avgränsning men inte mot befogenheterna som sådana.
- clarified police mandatedecisive»Renodla polisens uppdrag. Polisen fokuserar idag alldeles för mycket på annat än brottsbekämpning.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Clarify the police mandate. Today police focus far too much on things other than crime-fighting.”
- more police»Fler poliser och höjda polislöner.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“More police and increased police salaries.”
- security through the justice system»en fri och oberoende rättskipning ger trygghet för personlig integritet och egendom.« (party programme ↗)“a free and independent administration of justice provides security for personal integrity and property.”
- strong protection of integrity»Den personliga integriteten ska ha ett starkt« (party programme ↗)“Personal integrity shall have strong”
The plan wants to streamline the police force's mission so that police can dedicate themselves to detecting, investigating and clearing up crimes, and it explicitly gives law enforcement officers new authorities in another field.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to streamline the police force's mission so that police can dedicate themselves to detecting, investigating and clearing up crimes, and it explicitly gives law enforcement officers new authorities in another field. Denying law enforcement officers the right to body search for identification and to transport custody removals would keep these tasks with the police and bind up the resources the plan wants to free. The plan therefore argues against the counter-proposal's demand.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill renodla polisens uppdrag så att poliser kan ägna sig åt att upptäcka, utreda och klara upp brott, och den ger uttryckligen ordningsvakter nya befogenheter på annat område. Att neka ordningsvakter rätten att kroppsvisitera för identifiering och att transportera omhändertagna skulle behålla dessa uppgifter hos polisen och binda de resurser planen vill frigöra. Planen talar därför mot motförslagets krav.
- streamlined police missiondecisive»Renodla Polisens uppdrag med fokus på att upptäcka, utreda och klara upp brott« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Streamline the Police's mission with a focus on detecting, investigating and clearing up crimes”
- expanded law enforcement authority»Skärpa straffen för miljöbrott och nedskräpning och ge ordningsvakter befogenhet att dela ut böter för småskräp« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Tighten sentences for environmental crimes and litter and give law enforcement officers authority to issue fines for minor littering”
- delegate tasks from police(2022 manifesto)
- authority outside police»Ge butiksägare rätt att bestämma vem som får vistas i butikslokalen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Give shop owners the right to decide who is allowed to stay in the shop premises”
flags: citat_ej_verifierat
The election manifesto explicitly wants to test complementing the police organization with order guards with expanded authority and appropriate equipment, and to relieve the police.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto explicitly wants to test complementing the police organization with order guards with expanded authority and appropriate equipment, and to relieve the police. The party programme states that law enforcement agencies shall have necessary authority to protect citizens. The counter-proposal's demand that order guards not be given the right to body search and transport thus directly conflicts with the plan's commitment.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet vill uttryckligen pröva att komplettera polisorganisationen med ordningsvakter med utvidgade befogenheter och ändamålsenlig utrustning, samt avlasta poliserna. Principprogrammet slår fast att de rättsvårdande myndigheterna ska ha erforderliga befogenheter för att skydda medborgarna. Motförslagets krav på att inte ge ordningsvakter rätt till kroppsvisitation och transport strider därmed direkt mot planens åtagande.
- order guards with expanded authoritydecisive»Fler vägar in i polisyrket behöver också utredas liksom om det är möjligt att komplettera den befintliga polisorganisationen med att anställa ordningsvakter med utvidgade befogenheter och ändamålsenlig utrustning.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“More ways into the police profession also need to be investigated as well as whether it is possible to complement the existing police organization by hiring order guards with expanded authority and appropriate equipment.”
- relieve the police»Avlasta poliserna med civilanställda« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Relieve the police with civilian employees”
- necessary resources to the police»Polisen, gränsskyddet och de rättsvårdande myndigheterna måste tilldelas erforderliga resurser« (party programme ↗)“The police, border protection, and law enforcement agencies must be allocated necessary resources”
- the police's prerequisites»Ge polisen förutsättningarna för att bekämpa brottslighet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Give the police the prerequisites for combating crime”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2022/23:JuU23)
- Committee report full text (HA01JuU23)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2022/23:2368 — med anledning av prop. 2022/23:91 En ny lag om ordningsvakter av Gudrun Nordborg m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2022/23:2375 — med anledning av prop. 2022/23:91 En ny lag om ordningsvakter av Bassem Nasr m.fl. (MP)
- Proposition 2022/23:91 — En ny lag om ordningsvakter
Source: The Swedish Parliament