2023-03-152022/23:JuU11 · p.3JuUJustice
Violations of privacy and harassment
Stricter legislation on repeated-abuse offences
What's at stake: Repeated-abuse offences combine several individual criminal acts, for example within an abusive relationship, into one more serious offence. How the offence is constructed and when the limitation period starts running affects how well the law captures prolonged violence in close relationships, which particularly affects the women and children subjected to it.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The motions called for repeated-abuse offences to be reconstructed around the perpetrator's pattern of controlling behaviour, the minimum sentence for aggravated abuse of a woman's integrity to be raised, and the limitation period to start running when the relationship ends, while the committee held that the issue is already covered by an ongoing review.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee rejects the motions, pointing out that the question of further sentence increases is covered by the ongoing review of contact-ban legislation, and therefore finds no reason at this time to initiate further sentence increases or other legal changes regarding repeated-abuse offences.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 4 (MP)
The reserving party (MP) wants repeated-abuse offences reconstructed to be based on the perpetrator's controlling and undermining behaviour rather than separate acts, the minimum sentence for aggravated abuse of a woman's integrity raised to two years' imprisonment, and the limitation period for the offences to start running only once the relationship and harassment constituting the offence come to an end.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 4 by MP.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The division would have tied — and been settled by lot
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: MModeraterna, VVänsterpartiet
Ja 169–13Tied 91–91
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Yes 20/0/0/4 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| S | No | Abstain 1/0/91/15 | differs | confidence: high | explicit |
| MP | No | No 0/13/0/5 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| C | No | Abstain 0/0/19/5 | differs | confidence: high | explicit |
| L | No | Yes 13/0/0/3 | differs | confidence: high | not addressed |
| KD | No | Yes 15/0/0/4 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| M | No | Yes 58/0/0/10 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| SD | No | Yes 62/0/0/11 | differs | confidence: high | not addressed |
Broke with the party line
| SLena Johansson (S, Västmanlands län) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2022/23:863 by Ulrika Liljeberg et al. (C) demands 50 and 51, 2022/23:883 by Ulrika Liljeberg et al. (C) demands 4, 5 and 20, 2022/23:1673 by Annie Lööf et al. (C) demands 49 and 50, 2022/23:2139 by Ardalan Shekarabi et al. (S) demand 58, and 2022/23:2277 by Märta Stenevi et al. (MP) demands 109-111.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2022/23:863 av Ulrika Liljeberg m.fl. (C) yrkandena 50 och 51, 2022/23:883 av Ulrika Liljeberg m.fl. (C) yrkandena 4, 5 och 20, 2022/23:1673 av Annie Lööf m.fl. (C) yrkandena 49 och 50, 2022/23:2139 av Ardalan Shekarabi m.fl. (S) yrkande 58 och 2022/23:2277 av Märta Stenevi m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 109-111.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected approximately 140 proposals in motions on criminal law matters submitted during the general motions period in 2022. Some of the motions concern violations of privacy, controlling behavior, or psychological violence against children. Other motions concern, for example, pimping, sexual crimes on the internet, incitement against ethnic groups, child pornography offences, animal cruelty, harboring a criminal, multiple offences, aggravating circumstances, recidivism, unlawful settlement, flag desecration, and breach of confidentiality.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to reformulate peace violation crimes to be based on controlling behavior, raise the minimum sentence for aggravated intimate partner violence and change statute of limitations rules. (MP) — Reservation 4
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan establishes that men's violence against women is a structural societal problem that must lead to concrete measures in the legal system, and that the entire legal chain needs to function and that sentences shall make crimes a priority.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that men's violence against women is a structural societal problem that must lead to concrete measures in the legal system, and that the entire legal chain needs to function and that sentences shall make crimes a priority. Building peace protection crimes on the perpetrator's controlling and demeaning behaviour, raising the minimum sentence and letting the statute of limitations begin running when the relationship ends directly answer these demands.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att mäns våld mot kvinnor är ett strukturellt samhällsproblem som måste leda till konkreta åtgärder i rättssystemet, och att hela rättskedjan behöver fungera samt att straffen ska göra att brotten prioriteras. Att bygga fridskränkningsbrotten på förövarens kontrollerande och nedbrytande beteende, höja minimistraffet och låta preskriptionen börja löpa när förhållandet upphör svarar direkt mot dessa krav.
- structural violence requires legislationdecisive»Mäns våld mot kvinnor är ett strukturellt samhällsproblem.« (party programme ↗)“Men's violence against women is a structural societal problem.”
- crimes shall be prioritized»För det behövs det fler poliser, ökad kunskap inom rättsväsendet om samtycke och om våld mot kvinnor och barn, och straff som gör att brotten prioriteras av rättsvårdande instanser« (2022 manifesto ↗)“For that we need more police, increased knowledge within the legal system about consent and about violence against women and children, and sentences that make crimes a priority for law-enforcement authorities.”
- functioning legal chain»rättskedjan fungera från anmälan till åtal och domslut« (party programme ↗)“the entire legal chain function from report to prosecution and verdict.”
- raised sentences where needed»Vissa straff kan behöva höjas men mycket mer fokus måste riktas mot att förhindra rekryteringen av nya barn till gängkriminalitet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Some sentences may need to be raised but much more focus must be directed towards preventing the recruitment of new children into gang crime.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan explicitly wants to continue the direction that has increased penalties for violence and other violations in intimate relationships and requires a crackdown on men's violence against women.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly wants to continue the direction that has increased penalties for violence and other violations in intimate relationships and requires a crackdown on men's violence against women. To construct peace-breach crimes based on the perpetrator's controlling behaviour, raise the minimum sentence and delay the start of the statute of limitations are measures in exactly that direction. The plan's feminist stance on gender power structures leads to the same conclusion.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill uttryckligen fortsätta den riktning som skärpt straffen för våld och andra kränkningar i nära relationer och kräver krafttag mot mäns våld mot kvinnor. Att konstruera fridskränkningsbrotten utifrån förövarens kontrollerande beteende, höja minimistraffet och senarelägga preskriptionstidens start är åtgärder i just den riktningen. Planens feministiska grundsyn om könsmaktsordningen bär samma slutsats.
- increased penalties in intimate relationshipsdecisive»Vi vill fort sätta den politiska riktning som skärpt straffen för våld och andra kränkningar i nära relationer,« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to continue the political direction that has increased penalties for violence and other violations in intimate relationships”
- against men's violence against women»Krafttag för att stoppa hedersrelaterat våld, sexualbrott och mäns våld mot kvinnor.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Crackdown on honour-related violence, sexual offences and men's violence against women.”
- gender power relations must be broken»En tydlig maktstruktur är det som kallas könsmaktsordningen« (party programme ↗)“A clear power structure is what is called gender power relations”
- increased penalties for repeated crimes»Skärpa straffen för att hålla de kriminella borta från gatorna.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Increase penalties to keep criminals off the streets.”
flags: citat_migrerat
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan establishes that it is the perpetrator's freedom that should be limited and that violence in close relationships should be handled quickly, in a coordinated and consistent manner, with stronger protection for abused women.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that it is the perpetrator's freedom that should be limited and that violence in close relationships should be handled quickly, in a coordinated and consistent manner, with stronger protection for abused women. Constructing violation-of-protection crimes based on the perpetrator's controlling and degrading behaviour and allowing the statute of limitations to start running when the abuse stops corresponds to that view of the nature of violence. The crime construction is not explicitly addressed in the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att det är förövarens frihet som ska begränsas och att våld i nära relationer ska behandlas snabbt, samordnat och konsekvent, med starkare skydd för våldsutsatta kvinnor. Att konstruera fridskränkningsbrotten utifrån förövarens kontrollerande och nedbrytande beteende och låta preskriptionen börja löpa när förtrycket upphör svarar mot den synen på våldets karaktär. Brottskonstruktionen behandlas inte uttryckligen i planen.
- limit perpetrator's freedomdecisive»det är förövarens frihet som ska begränsas« (2022 manifesto ↗)“it is the perpetrator's freedom that should be limited”
- consistent against violence in relationships»Våld i nära relationer ska behandlas på ett snabbt,« (party programme ↗)“Violence in close relationships shall be handled quickly,”
- stronger protection for abused women»att våldsutsatta kvinnor som tvingas gömma sig ska få starkare skydd och att fler som utövar våld ska få fotboja« (2022 manifesto ↗)“that abused women who are forced to hide shall receive stronger protection and that more who commit violence shall receive ankle monitors”
- women's safety»Kvinnor ska kunna leva sina liv i trygghet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Women shall be able to live their lives in safety”
The election manifesto explicitly requires increased penalties for serious assault and serious assault against women as well as criminalisation of controlling behaviour, which is exactly what the counter-proposal wants to build the crimes around.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto explicitly requires increased penalties for serious assault and serious assault against women as well as criminalisation of controlling behaviour, which is exactly what the counter-proposal wants to build the crimes around. The plan also wants violence after separation to cease and protection against contact bans to be strengthened, which supports the proposal for changed statute of limitations as long as harassment continues. The requirement is therefore at the heart of the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet kräver uttryckligen höjda straff för grov fridskränkning och grov kvinnofridskränkning samt kriminalisering av kontrollerande beteende, vilket är exakt vad motförslaget vill bygga brotten kring. Planen vill också att eftervåldet upphör och att skyddet vid kontaktförbud stärks, vilket bär förslaget om ändrad preskriptionsstart så länge trakasserierna pågår. Kravet ligger därmed i planens kärna.
- increased penalties for assaultdecisive»Män som slår ska inte komma undan. Vi vill höja straffen för sexualbrott, grov fridskränkning och grov kvinnofridskränkning.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Men who use violence shall not get away with it. We want to increase penalties for sexual crimes, serious assault and serious assault against women.”
- criminalise controlling behaviour»Därför vill vi skärpa straffen för sexualbrott och för mäns våld mot kvinnor, och kriminalisera kontrollerande beteende.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Therefore, we want to toughen penalties for sexual crimes and violence against women, and criminalise controlling behaviour.”
- combat violence after separation»Det är också viktigt att brottsoffer får bättre stöd och att eftervåldet bekämpas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is also important that crime victims receive better support and that violence after separation is combated.”
- violence in close relationships unacceptable»Våld i nära relationer, sexualiserat våld, hedersrelaterat våld och kränkningar« (party programme ↗)“Violence in close relationships, sexualised violence, honour-related violence and violations”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The election manifesto demands increased action against violence against women with higher penalties and better protection for victims, and the party programme establishes that efforts against violence in intimate relationships shall focus on perpetrators and that all gender-related violence shall be prevented.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto demands increased action against violence against women with higher penalties and better protection for victims, and the party programme establishes that efforts against violence in intimate relationships shall focus on perpetrators and that all gender-related violence shall be prevented. The counter-proposal's requirement – a crime construction built on the perpetrator's controlling behaviour, raised minimum sentence for the most serious form and later start of limitation – aligns with these commitments. The plan however says nothing about awaiting ongoing reviews.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet kräver ökad handlingskraft mot våld mot kvinnor med högre straff och bättre skydd för offren, och partiprogrammet slår fast att insatserna mot våld i nära relationer ska fokusera på förövarna och att allt könsrelaterat våld ska förebyggas. Motförslagets krav – en brottskonstruktion byggd på förövarens kontrollerande beteende, höjt minimistraff för den grövsta formen och senare preskriptionsstart – ligger i linje med dessa åtaganden. Planen säger däremot inget om att avvakta pågående översyner.
- higher penalties for violence against womendecisive»Vi vill se en ökad handlingskraft mot sexuellt våld och våld mot kvinnor genom bland annat högre straff för sexualbrott och ett bättre skydd och stöd för offren.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to see increased action against sexual violence and violence against women through among other things higher penalties for sexual crimes and better protection and support for victims.”
- focus on perpetrator behaviour»Insatserna för att förebygga och förhindra våld i nära relationer måste fokusera på förövarna.« (party programme ↗)“Efforts to prevent and stop violence in intimate relationships must focus on perpetrators.”
- prevent intimate violence»Alla former av våld i relationer och könsrelaterat våld ska förebyggas.« (party programme ↗)“All forms of violence in relationships and gender-related violence shall be prevented.”
- repeat crime results in stricter punishment»Påföljdssystemet ska förändras så att återfall och upprepad brottslighet ger strängare straff« (party programme ↗)“The penalty system shall be changed so that reoffending and repeated crime results in stricter punishment”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan establishes that men's violence against women is the ultimate expression of lack of equality and that legislation must mark the crime's seriousness, and requires sharply increased penalties for crimes against close relations and vulnerable persons.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that men's violence against women is the ultimate expression of lack of equality and that legislation must mark the crime's seriousness, and requires sharply increased penalties for crimes against close relations and vulnerable persons. A crime construction that captures controlling behavior, raised minimum sentence and later statute of limitations start address this. The plan does not speak to the technical design.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att mäns våld mot kvinnor är det yttersta uttrycket för bristande jämställdhet och att lagstiftningen måste markera brottets allvar, samt kräver kraftigt skärpta straff för brott mot närstående och utsatta. En brottskonstruktion som fångar det kontrollerande beteendet, höjt minimistraff och senare preskriptionsstart svarar mot detta. Planen uttalar sig inte om den tekniska utformningen.
- men's violence against womendecisive»Mäns våld mot kvinnor är det yttersta uttrycket för« (party programme ↗)“Men's violence against women is the ultimate expression of”
- sharply increased penalties»Skärp straffen för sexualbrott kraftigt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen penalties for sexual crimes sharply.”
- protection from violence in close relationships»nära relation ska ges adekvat stöd och skydd.« (party programme ↗)“close relation shall be given adequate support and protection.”
- firmness against violations»Respekten för lagarna ska därför upprätthållas« (party programme ↗)“Respect for the law shall therefore be maintained”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto explicitly says that penalties for gross violation of a woman's integrity shall be tightened and that violence in close relationships shall be met with harder consequences.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto explicitly says that penalties for gross violation of a woman's integrity shall be tightened and that violence in close relationships shall be met with harder consequences. The plan also wants a new criminal code that shifts focus from perpetrator to crime victim, which supports that the crime is constructed based on the perpetrator's controlling behaviour. The counter-proposal's demands for raised minimum penalties and extended statute of limitations therefore align with the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet säger uttryckligen att straffen för grov kvinnofridskränkning ska skärpas och att våld i nära relation ska mötas med hårdare konsekvenser. Planen vill också en ny brottsbalk som flyttar fokus från gärningsman till brottsoffer, vilket stödjer att brottet konstrueras utifrån förövarens kontrollerande beteende. Motförslagets krav på höjt minimistraff och utvidgad preskription ligger därför i linje med planen.
- tightened penalties for violation of woman's integritydecisive»Moderaterna vill skärpa straffen för detta brott« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Moderate Party wants to increase penalties for this crime”
- penalty increases for violence crimes»Skärpa straffen för vålds- och sexualbrott« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Tighten penalties for crimes of violence and sexual crime”
- victim perspective in criminal law»Införa en ny brottsbalk för att skifta fokus från gärningsmannen till brottsoffer« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Introduce a new criminal code to shift focus from the perpetrator to the crime victim”
- sharper tools against perpetrators»Införa vistelseförbud för personer som dömts för våld i nära relation« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Introduce a restraining order for persons convicted of violence in close relationships”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan requires significantly increased and proportionate sentences for serious crimes against persons and an action plan for those subjected to violence in close relationships, with the crime victim's best interest and not the perpetrator's as the starting point.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires significantly increased and proportionate sentences for serious crimes against persons and an action plan for those subjected to violence in close relationships, with the crime victim's best interest and not the perpetrator's as the starting point. The counter-proposal's demand for increased minimum sentence for the most serious assault and a construction that captures controlling behaviour responds to this. The crime victim perspective also speaks for later statute of limitations start.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver kraftigt höjda och proportionerliga straff för allvarliga brott mot person och en handlingsplan för den som utsätts för våld i nära relation, med brottsoffrets bästa och inte gärningsmannen som utgångspunkt. Motförslagets krav på höjt minimistraff för den grövsta fridskränkningen och en konstruktion som fångar det kontrollerande beteendet svarar mot detta. Brottsofferperspektivet talar också för senare preskriptionsstart.
- significantly increased sentencesdecisive»Kraftigt höja straffen samt avskaffa mängdrabatten vid allvarliga brott mot person« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Significantly increase sentences and eliminate the quantity discount for serious crimes against persons”
- measures against intimate partner violence»Upprätta en handlingsplan för den som utsätts för våld i nära relation« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Establish an action plan for those subjected to violence in close relationships”
- crime victim perspective»Utformningen av politiken måste ske utifrån brottsoffrets bästa, inte gärningsmannen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Policy making must be carried out from the perspective of the crime victim's best interest, not the perpetrator's.”
- proportionate sentences»Införa straff som är proportionerliga« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Introduce sentences that are proportionate”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2022/23:JuU11)
- Committee report full text (HA01JuU11)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2022/23:1001 — Grundlag av Matheus Enholm m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2022/23:1003 — Sverigevänlig konsumentpolitik av Mikael Eskilandersson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2022/23:1004 — Sverigedemokratisk insolvensrätt av Mikael Eskilandersson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2022/23:1013 — Post och it i hela landet av Jimmy Ståhl m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2022/23:1079 — Om straffrabatt och villkorlig frigivning för de som återgår till brott av Camilla Brunsberg (M)
- Motion 2022/23:1086 — Översyn av förtalslagstiftningen av Ida Drougge (M)
- Motion 2022/23:1105 — All blåljuspersonal ska ha tjänstemannastatus av Ann-Sofie Alm (M)
- Motion 2022/23:1106 — Skärpt sexualbrottslag av Ann-Sofie Alm (M)
- Motion 2022/23:1111 — Eftersupning av Hans Eklind (KD)
- Motion 2022/23:1117 — Förstärkning av barns rättsskydd mot olika former av sexuellt utnyttjande av Gudrun Brunegård (KD)
- Motion 2022/23:1171 — Progressiva böter vid fortkörning av Monica Haider (S)
- Motion 2022/23:1203 — Mängdrabatt av Mattias Ottosson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2022/23:1232 — En funktionsrättspolitik för trygghet och delaktighet av Maj Karlsson m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2022/23:124 — En översyn av lagen om hets mot folkgrupp av Ola Möller (S)
- Motion 2022/23:1315 — Kriminalisering av kontrollerande beteenden och psykisk misshandel av Aylin Fazelian (S)
- Motion 2022/23:1441 — Fastställande av dagsböter av Serkan Köse m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2022/23:149 — Kriminalisering av sexköp utomlands av Lawen Redar (S)
- Motion 2022/23:1673 — Jämställdhet för hållbar utveckling av Annie Lööf m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2022/23:1681 — Sexsomni av Helena Vilhelmsson och Anne-Li Sjölund (båda C)
- Motion 2022/23:1708 — Sexualbrott av Josefin Malmqvist (M)
Source: The Swedish Parliament