2026-06-152025/26:MJU24 · p.2MJUEnvironment & agriculture

New authority for environmental assessment

Establishment of a new environmental permitting authority

What's at stake: The decision determines whether a new, centralized authority takes over environmental permitting from the county administrative boards, affecting processing times, regional expertise, and how close decision-making remains to businesses and local communities across the country.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is whether parliament should adopt the government's bill establishing a new, centralized environmental permitting authority in place of the county boards' permitting delegations, or reject the bill due to risks to regional expertise.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee backs the government's bill to establish a new environmental permitting authority, viewing it as an important step toward making the permitting process more efficient, predictable, and consistent across the country.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 1 (V)

V rejects the funding for establishing the authority, arguing that centralization to Stockholm risks losing the regional expertise held by the county administrative boards, which could in turn weaken their remaining supervisory duties.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: adopting the government's legislative proposal and rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by V.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
Vown reservationNoNo 0/21/0/0follows the planconfidence: lownot addressed
SYesYes 105/0/0/1follows the planconfidence: lowderived
MPNoYes 18/0/0/0departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
CYesYes 24/0/0/0follows the planconfidence: lowderived
LYesYes 16/0/0/0follows the planconfidence: lowderived
KDNoYes 19/0/0/0departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived
MYesYes 66/0/0/0follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
SDYesYes 70/0/0/0follows the planconfidence: mediumderived

Committee proposal

The Riksdag adopts the Government's proposal to 1. amend the Environmental Code, 2. amend the Environmental Code with the modification that Chapter 19, Section 5 shall have the wording that the Committee proposes in Appendix 3, 3. amend the Act (2010:921) on Land and Environmental Courts. By this the Riksdag approves proposition 2025/26:238 points 1-3 and rejects motion 2025/26:4105 by Andrea Andersson Tay et al. (V).

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen antar regeringens förslag till 1. lag om ändring i miljöbalken, 2. lag om ändring i miljöbalken med den ändringen att 19 kap. 5 § ska ha den lydelse som utskottet föreslår i bilaga 3, 3. lag om ändring i lagen (2010:921) om mark- och miljödomstolar. Därmed bifaller riksdagen proposition 2025/26:238 punkterna 1-3 och avslår motion 2025/26:4105 av Andrea Andersson Tay m.fl. (V).

Riksdag decision: The Riksdag approved the Government's proposal which makes it possible to establish a new authority for environmental assessments. The new authority, the Environmental Assessment Authority (Miljöprövningsmyndigheten), shall take over the tasks that the environmental assessment delegations at the county administrative boards are responsible for today. The purpose of the decision is to make environmental permit processes more efficient, simple and equitable. The new rules begin mainly to enter into force on 1 July 2027.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoNofollows the plannot addressed

The plan requires that school, healthcare, care and other services function everywhere and wants to see tools for regionally balanced development, while at the same time environmental goals shall be followed up with sharp legislation and practical work.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan requires that school, healthcare, care and other services function everywhere and wants to see tools for regionally balanced development, while at the same time environmental goals shall be followed up with sharp legislation and practical work. A centralization of environmental review to a new authority in Stockholm risks draining county administrative boards' regional expertise and thus their oversight. The counter-proposal's objection therefore lies closer to the plan's principles than the committee's line.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver att skola, vård, omsorg och annan service fungerar överallt och vill se verktyg för en regionalt balanserad utveckling, samtidigt som miljömålen ska följas upp med skarp lagstiftning och praktiskt arbete. En centralisering av miljöprövningen till en ny myndighet i Stockholm riskerar att dränera länsstyrelsernas regionala kompetens och därmed tillsynen. Motförslagets invändning ligger därför närmare planens principer än utskottets linje.

  • regionally balanced developmentdecisive»för att skapa en regionalt balanserad ekonomisk utveckling.« (party programme ↗)“to create regionally balanced economic development.”
  • service throughout the country»Skola, vård, omsorg och annan service behöver fungera överallt.« (party programme ↗)“School, healthcare, care and other services need to function everywhere.”
  • sharp environmental oversight»miljömål som följs upp med skarp lagstiftning och praktiskt arbete.« (party programme ↗)“environmental goals followed up with sharp legislation and practical work.”
SSocialdemokraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan requires that slow approval processes be accelerated and good conditions for industrial establishments throughout the country, which speaks for financing the new examination authority.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan requires that slow approval processes be accelerated and good conditions for industrial establishments throughout the country, which speaks for financing the new examination authority. Rejecting the financing would preserve the long processing times the plan wants to eliminate. The plan's requirement for state presence throughout the country provides some support for the objection to centralization, but does not weigh as heavily.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver att långsamma tillståndsprocesser snabbas på och goda förutsättningar för industrietableringar i hela landet, vilket talar för att finansiera den nya prövningsmyndigheten. Att avvisa finansieringen skulle bevara de långa handläggningstider planen vill bort. Planens krav på statlig närvaro i hela landet ger visst stöd för invändningen mot centralisering, men väger inte lika tungt.

  • faster approval processesdecisive»Riv de byråkratiska hindren för mer el. Långsamma tillståndsprocesser ska snabbas på.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Tear down the bureaucratic barriers to more electricity. Slow approval processes shall be accelerated.”
  • conditions for industry»Goda förutsättningar för industrietableringar och utveckling av befintlig industri i hela« (party programme ↗)“Good conditions for industrial establishments and development of existing industry throughout”
  • equal review throughout the country»Större statligt ansvar för likvärdiga förutsättningar i hela Sverige.« (party programme ↗)“Greater state responsibility for equal conditions throughout Sweden.”
  • state presence throughout the country»Staten ska finnas närvarande i hela landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The state shall be present throughout the country.”
MPMiljöpartietNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The counter-proposal warns that centralising environmental review undermines regional expertise and thus county administrative board oversight.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The counter-proposal warns that centralising environmental review undermines regional expertise and thus county administrative board oversight. The plan requires effective oversight that environmental laws are followed and that the transition is not used as an excuse to relax environmental protection, while decentralisation and locally adapted solutions are guiding principles. The basis is, however, weak and the conclusion is derived.

Original (Swedish)

Motförslaget varnar för att en centralisering av miljöprövningen urholkar den regionala kompetensen och därmed länsstyrelsernas tillsyn. Planen kräver en effektiv tillsyn av att miljölagarna följs och att omställningen inte används som ursäkt för att luckra upp miljöskyddet, samtidigt som decentralisering och lokalt anpassade lösningar är bärande principer. Underlaget är dock svagt och slutsatsen härledd.

  • effective environmental oversightdecisive»behövs en tydlig lagstiftning mot miljöförstöring och en effektiv tillsyn av att lagarna« (party programme ↗)“there is a need for clear legislation against environmental destruction and effective oversight that the laws are”
  • strong environmental protection in transition»ekosystem och miljö vara starkt. Den gröna omställningen ska inte användas som ursäkt« (party programme ↗)“ecosystem and environment must be strong. The green transition shall not be used as an excuse”
  • decentralisation»Decentralisering skapar motvikt till maktkoncentration.« (party programme ↗)“Decentralisation creates counterbalance to power concentration.”
  • locally adapted solutions»utvecklas. Det kräver lokalt anpassade lösningar, där boende och aktörer i både städer« (party programme ↗)“developed. It requires locally adapted solutions, where residents and actors in both cities”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

CCenterpartietYesYesfollows the planderived

The explicit commitment of the election manifesto is to halve the time it takes to get approval for green investments and that the climate cannot wait for complicated regulations.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The explicit commitment of the election manifesto is to halve the time it takes to get approval for green investments and that the climate cannot wait for complicated regulations. A coordinated approval authority is a means for precisely that, and rejecting its financing would slow down the reform. The plan's decentralist line and the requirement for presence throughout the country speaks for the counter-proposal's objection, but weighs less than the approval promise.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestets uttryckliga åtagande är att halvera tiden det tar att få tillstånd för gröna investeringar och att klimatet inte kan vänta på krångliga regelverk. En samlad prövningsmyndighet är ett medel för just det, och att avvisa dess finansiering skulle bromsa reformen. Planens decentralistiska linje och kravet på närvaro i hela landet talar för motförslagets invändning, men väger lättare än tillståndslöftet.

  • halved approval timesdecisive»Det är dags att halvera tiden det tar att få tillstånd för gröna investeringar och reformera miljöbalken så att ett projekts klimatnytta ges större vikt i miljöprövningen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is time to halve the time it takes to get approval for green investments and reform the Environmental Code so that a project's climate benefit is given greater weight in environmental review.”
  • the climate cannot wait»Klimatet kan inte vänta på dyra och krångliga regelverk.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The climate cannot wait for expensive and complicated regulations.”
  • shortened processing times»Ledtiderna för handläggning och myndighetsutövning i domstolar och myndigheter måste kortas och tillgången till ombud förbättras.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Processing times for court and authority proceedings must be shortened and access to lawyers must be improved.”
  • decentralization»Decentralisera mera. Människor ska få bestämma mer själva, och politiska beslut ska fattas nära dem som berörs.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Decentralize more. People should have more say, and political decisions should be made close to those affected.”
LLiberalernaYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan wants to shorten processes, reduce regulatory burden and quickly remove obstacles for business, which is precisely the purpose of an integrated authority for environmental assessment.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants to shorten processes, reduce regulatory burden and quickly remove obstacles for business, which is precisely the purpose of an integrated authority for environmental assessment. The counter-proposal rejects the financing and thus stops the reform. The plan's requirement for state presence throughout the country supports however the objection about regional expertise.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill korta processerna, minska regelbördan och snabbt undanröja hinder för företag, vilket är precis syftet med en samlad myndighet för miljöprövning. Motförslaget avvisar finansieringen och stoppar därmed reformen. Planens krav på statlig närvaro i hela landet stödjer däremot invändningen om regional kompetens.

  • remove obstaclesdecisive»Politikens uppgift måste vara att snabbt undanröja hinder för att underlätta för företag och människor att ta vara på de möjligheter som den tekniska utvecklingen skapar.« (party programme ↗)“Politics' task must be quickly to remove obstacles to facilitate companies and people to take advantage of the opportunities that technical development creates.”
  • shorter processes»korta överklagandeprocesserna och fortsätta förenkla byggreglerna« (2022 manifesto ↗)“shorten appeal processes and continue simplifying building regulations”
  • state presence throughout the country»Vägnätet ska fungera och statliga myndigheter ska finnas närvarande i alla delar av Sverige.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The road network shall function and state authorities shall be present in all parts of Sweden.”
  • reduced regulatory burden»Regelbördan för små företag ska minska, genom ansträngningar på både kommunal, statlig och europeisk nivå, och offentliga beslut analyseras ur småföretagarperspektiv.« (party programme ↗)“The regulatory burden on small businesses shall decrease, through efforts at municipal, state and European level, and public decisions analysed from a small business perspective.”
KDKristdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan establishes a purposeful pursuit of a decentralized society, that state services shall be available throughout Sweden, and that regional conditions in the form of people's competence shall be supported and promoted.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan establishes a purposeful pursuit of a decentralized society, that state services shall be available throughout Sweden, and that regional conditions in the form of people's competence shall be supported and promoted. The counter-proposal's objection that centralization to a new agency undermines county administrative boards' regional competence rests on precisely that principle of the right power in the right place.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast en målmedveten strävan mot ett decentraliserat samhälle, att statlig service ska vara tillgänglig i hela Sverige och att regionala förutsättningar i form av människors kompetens ska stödjas och främjas. Motförslagets invändning att centralisering till en ny myndighet urholkar länsstyrelsernas regionala kompetens vilar på just den principen om rätt makt på rätt plats.

  • decentralized societydecisive»målmedveten strävan mot ett decentraliserat samhälle.« (party programme ↗)“purposeful pursuit of a decentralized society.”
  • state services throughout the country»Samtidigt har staten ansvar för att den statliga servicen är tillgänglig i hela Sverige.« (party programme ↗)“At the same time, the state has responsibility for state services to be available throughout Sweden.”
  • regional competence shall be promoted»förutsättningar som finns i form av naturresurser och människors kompetens och kreativitet« (party programme ↗)“conditions that exist in the form of natural resources and people's competence and creativity”
  • subsidiarity»Rätt makt på rätt plats, det är den kristdemokratiska subsidiaritetsprincipens innebörd.« (party programme ↗)“Right power in the right place, that is the meaning of the Christian Democratic subsidiarity principle.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MModeraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan's demands in the environmental review area are shorter processing times and simplified permit processes, with a deadline for government agencies.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan's demands in the environmental review area are shorter processing times and simplified permit processes, with a deadline for government agencies. A consolidated review authority serves that purpose, and the counter-proposal wants to reject its financing. The plan says nothing about where the agency should be located, but its goals of faster and more equitable review weigh more heavily. The demand is rejected.

Original (Swedish)

Planens krav på miljöprövningsområdet är kortare handläggningstider och förenklade tillståndsprocesser, med en bortre tidsgräns för myndigheterna. En samlad prövningsmyndighet tjänar det syftet, och motförslaget vill avvisa dess finansiering. Planen säger inget om var myndigheten ska ligga, men dess mål om snabbare och mer likvärdig prövning väger tyngre. Kravet avvisas.

  • deadline for processingdecisive»Korta myndigheternas handläggningstider genom en bortre tidsgräns« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Shorten government agencies' processing times by setting a deadline”
  • shorter times for environmental permits»Minska antalet regler för jordbruket och korta handläggningstider för miljötillstånd« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Reduce the number of regulations for agriculture and shorten processing times for environmental permits”
  • faster review for electricity grid»Investera i det svenska elnätet och korta tillståndsprocesserna för elnätsutbyggnad« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Invest in the Swedish electricity grid and shorten permit processes for electricity grid expansion”
SDSverigedemokraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan states that licensing processes are too long and unpredictable and shall be made more efficient, and wants to merge agencies and streamline public operations.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan states that licensing processes are too long and unpredictable and shall be made more efficient, and wants to merge agencies and streamline public operations. A new unified licensing authority is in line with this, while the counter-proposal rejects financing. The plan's wish to relocate government jobs gives some support to the objection to centralization, but weighs less than the demand for faster licensing.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att tillståndsprocesserna är för långa och oförutsägbara och ska effektiviseras, och vill slå samman myndigheter och renodla offentlig verksamhet. En ny samlad prövningsmyndighet ligger i linje med detta, medan motförslaget avvisar finansieringen. Planens önskan att utlokalisera myndighetsjobb ger visst stöd åt invändningen mot centralisering, men väger lättare än kravet på snabbare prövning.

  • more efficient licensingdecisive»Effektivisera och öka förutsägbarheten i tillståndsprocesserna för gruvnäring, elnätsutbyggnad och industri« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Make licensing processes more efficient and increase predictability for mining, power grid expansion and industry”
  • long processes harm Sweden»Tillståndsprocesser är ofta långa och oförutsägbara och Sveriges attraktionskraft för investeringar och anställningar minskar« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Licensing processes are often long and unpredictable and Sweden's attractiveness for investments and jobs decreases”
  • merge agencies»Sverigedemokraterna vill också slå samman myndigheter och renodla offentliga verksamheter där det är möjligt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden Democrats also want to merge agencies and streamline public operations where possible.”
  • government jobs outside major cities»Sverigedemokraterna ser potential för att utlokalisera fler myndighetsjobb till mindre orter« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden Democrats see potential for relocating more government jobs to smaller towns”

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament