2024-03-072023/24:KU8 · p.1KUConstitution
Promotion of democracy
Measures to strengthen democratic participation, particularly for people with disabilities
What's at stake: How accessible elections and public information are affects whether all citizens, not least people with disabilities, can in practice take part in democratic processes on equal terms.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the existing goals for democracy and disability policy, together with the ongoing review of the electoral system, are sufficient, or whether parliament should take its own initiative for the state to work more actively to increase democratic participation, for example through more accessible polling stations and election information.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee agrees that democratic participation should be as broad as possible, but notes that established goals for democracy policy and disability policy already exist, and that a parliamentary committee is reviewing the electoral system. The committee therefore finds no grounds for parliament to take its own initiative and rejects the motions.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 1 (C)
The reservation (C) calls for the government to actively work for increased democratic participation, from the ability to vote to accessing public documents. It highlights people with disabilities in particular, calling for polling stations to be adapted to safeguard the secrecy of the ballot, for authorities to provide easy-to-read election information as well as information adapted for impaired sight and hearing, and for venues where democracy is exercised to be made accessible to everyone.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by C.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have held
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: KDKristdemokraterna, MPMiljöpartiet, VVänsterpartiet
Ja 276–20Ja 227–69
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Yes 20/0/0/4 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| S | No | Yes 91/0/0/15 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| MP | No | Yes 14/0/0/4 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| C | No | No 0/20/0/4 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 13/0/0/3 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| KD | No | Yes 15/0/0/4 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| M | No | Yes 59/0/0/9 | differs | confidence: low | not addressed |
| SD | No | Yes 62/0/0/10 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects motion 2023/24:2490 by Malin Björk et al. (C) demands 6 and 7.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motion 2023/24:2490 av Malin Björk m.fl. (C) yrkandena 6 och 7.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected around 40 proposals in motions on public administration from the general motion session of 2023. The motions concern, among other things, promotion of democracy, state employment, corruption and protection of decision-makers. The Riksdag refers, among other things, to current regulations and ongoing work.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to strengthen accessibility for people with disabilities in all democratic processes and ensure that polling and meeting venues are fully adapted. (C) — Reservation 1
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan requires that all parts of society are made accessible and that everyone shall have the right to be included in society, with a clear disability perspective within all policy areas.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that all parts of society are made accessible and that everyone shall have the right to be included in society, with a clear disability perspective within all policy areas. Adapted polling stations, easy-to-read voting information and accessible venues where democracy is practised are a direct application of that commitment, since discrimination based on disability can never be tolerated.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att alla delar av samhället görs tillgängliga och att alla ska ha rätten att vara delaktiga i samhället, med ett tydligt funktionshinderperspektiv inom alla politikområden. Anpassade vallokaler, lättläst valinformation och tillgängliga lokaler där demokratin utövas är en direkt tillämpning av det åtagandet, eftersom diskriminering på grund av funktionsnedsättning aldrig kan tolereras.
- the whole of society shall be made accessibledecisive»delar av samhället göras tillgängligt och den alltför svaga diskrimineringslagstiftningen stärkas.« (party programme ↗)“parts of society are made accessible and the all too weak discrimination legislation is strengthened.”
- right to participation»Alla människor ska ha rätten att vara delaktiga i samhället, bli bemötta« (party programme ↗)“All people shall have the right to be included in society, be treated”
- disability perspective everywhere»Ett tydligt funktionshinderperspektiv ska finnas med inom alla politikområden.« (party programme ↗)“A clear disability perspective shall be present within all policy areas.”
- prohibition of discrimination»Alla människors lika värde innebär att diskriminering på grund av kön, funktionsnedsättning, sexuell läggning eller könsidentitet, ålder,« (party programme ↗)“All people's equal value means that discrimination based on sex, disability, sexual orientation or gender identity, age,”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The party programme establishes that democratic freedoms must not be reserved for certain groups and that everyone, regardless of functional ability, shall have equal opportunity for participation in society.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme establishes that democratic freedoms must not be reserved for certain groups and that everyone, regardless of functional ability, shall have equal opportunity for participation in society. The counter-proposal's requirement for adapted polling stations, easy-to-read election information and accessible democracy venues is precisely this in practice. The plan also requires that the democratic process is based on transparency and insight.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår fast att de demokratiska friheterna inte får vara förbehållna vissa grupper och att alla, oavsett funktionsförmåga, ska ha lika möjlighet till delaktighet i samhällslivet. Motförslagets krav på anpassade vallokaler, lättläst valinformation och tillgängliga demokratilokaler är just detta i praktiken. Planen kräver också att den demokratiska processen bygger på offentlighet och insyn.
- equal right to influencedecisive»Dessa demokratiska friheter får inte vara förbehållna vissa grupper. Alla har lika rätt att påverka samhällets utveckling.« (party programme ↗)“These democratic freedoms must not be reserved for certain groups. Everyone has equal right to influence society's development.”
- equal participation in society»Vi socialdemokrater vill att alla ska ha lika förutsättningar och lika möjlighet till delaktighet i samhällslivet.« (party programme ↗)“We social democrats want everyone to have equal conditions and equal opportunity for participation in society.”
- participation regardless of functional ability»Därför vill vi skapa ett samhälle där alla människor, oavsett funktionsförmåga, har rätt till arbete, eget boende, full rörelsefrihet och ett aktivt liv.« (party programme ↗)“That is why we want to create a society where all people, regardless of functional ability, have the right to work, own housing, full mobility and an active life.”
- transparency and insight»Den demokratiska processen och samhällsförvaltningen måste bygga på offentlighet och insyn.« (party programme ↗)“The democratic process and public administration must be based on transparency and insight.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan establishes that people with disabilities shall have the same opportunity to participate in society as others and that lack of accessibility in itself is a form of discrimination.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that people with disabilities shall have the same opportunity to participate in society as others and that lack of accessibility in itself is a form of discrimination. The counter-proposal's requirement for adapted polling stations, easily readable information and accessible locations where democracy is exercised is exactly this. The plan also requires easily accessible information as a prerequisite for a participatory democracy.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att människor med funktionsnedsättningar ska ha samma möjlighet att delta i samhället som andra och att bristande tillgänglighet i sig är en form av diskriminering. Motförslagets krav på anpassade vallokaler, lättläst information och tillgängliga lokaler där demokratin utövas är just detta. Planen kräver dessutom lättillgänglig information som förutsättning för en deltagande demokrati.
- equal participationdecisive»Människor med funktionsnedsättningar ska ha samma möjlighet att delta i samhället som andra.« (party programme ↗)“People with disabilities shall have the same opportunity to participate in society as others.”
- accessibility as a right»Bristande tillgänglighet är i sig en typ av diskriminering och måste därför bli en ny diskrimineringsgrund.« (party programme ↗)“Lack of accessibility is in itself a type of discrimination and must therefore become a new discrimination ground.”
- easily accessible democracy»En deltagande demokrati kräver lättillgänglig information, en levande politisk debatt och möjlighet för medborgare att lyssna på sammanträden och lämna egna förslag till politiska församlingar.« (party programme ↗)“A participatory democracy requires easily accessible information, a lively political debate and opportunity for citizens to listen to meetings and submit their own proposals to political assemblies.”
- inaccessibility is the obstacle»Det är otillgängligheten i samhället som utgör det verkliga hindret« (party programme ↗)“It is the lack of accessibility in society that constitutes the real obstacle”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The party programme establishes that accessibility is crucial for people with disabilities and that all structures that discriminate shall be combated.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme establishes that accessibility is crucial for people with disabilities and that all structures that discriminate shall be combated. The election manifesto promises that liberal democracy shall be cared for and further developed and that work against discrimination shall be strengthened. The counter-proposal's requirements for accessible polling places, adapted information and protected ballot secrecy follow from these commitments, although the plan does not specifically mention electoral administration.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår fast att tillgänglighet är avgörande för människor med funktionsnedsättning och att alla strukturer som diskriminerar ska bekämpas. Valmanifestet lovar att den liberala demokratin ska vårdas och vidareutvecklas och att arbetet mot diskriminering ska stärkas. Motförslagets krav på tillgängliga vallokaler, anpassad information och skyddad valhemlighet följer av dessa åtaganden, även om planen inte nämner valadministrationen specifikt.
- full accessibilitydecisive»Tillgängligheten är avgörande för människor med olika funktionsnedsättningar.« (party programme ↗)“Accessibility is crucial for people with different disabilities.”
- care for liberal democracy»Den liberala demokratin får aldrig tas för given. Den ska vårdas, värnas och vidareutvecklas — idag och för kommande generationer.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Liberal democracy must never be taken for granted. It shall be cared for, protected and further developed — today and for future generations.”
- counter discrimination»Mer måste göras mot diskriminering. Vi vill stärka myndigheternas arbete mot diskriminering och höja ersättningen till dem som utsatts, samt lägga till kön och funktionsnedsättning som hatbrottsgrunder.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“More must be done against discrimination. We want to strengthen the authorities' work against discrimination and increase compensation for those who have been subjected to it, and add gender and disability as hate crime grounds.”
- everyone's equal rights and value»Vi bekämpar alla strukturer, formella och informella, som förtrycker eller diskriminerar människor.« (party programme ↗)“We combat all structures, formal and informal, that oppress or discriminate against people.”
The plan establishes that Sweden shall be an accessible country, that the public environment shall be accessible and that systematic supervision is needed to remove easily remedied obstacles.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that Sweden shall be an accessible country, that the public environment shall be accessible and that systematic supervision is needed to remove easily remedied obstacles. Applied to polling stations and government agencies' information it bears the counter-proposal's requirement directly. The plan moreover wants the disability rights perspective always to be present when political decisions are made and that more get the opportunity to influence decision-making.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att Sverige ska vara ett tillgängligt land, att den offentliga miljön ska vara tillgänglig och att systematisk tillsyn behövs för att få bort enkelt avhjälpta hinder. Tillämpat på vallokaler och myndigheternas information bär det motförslagets krav rakt av. Planen vill dessutom att funktionsrättsperspektivet alltid finns med när politiska beslut fattas och att fler får möjlighet att påverka beslutsfattandet.
- accessible societydecisive»Sverige ska vara ett tillgängligt land.« (party programme ↗)“Sweden shall be an accessible country.”
- remove remediable obstacles»Systematisk tillsyn behövs för att få bort enkelt avhjälpta hinder.« (party programme ↗)“Systematic supervision is needed to remove easily remedied obstacles.”
- disability rights perspective in decisions»funktionsrättsperspektivet alltid finns med när politiska beslut förbereds och fattas« (party programme ↗)“the disability rights perspective is always present when political decisions are prepared and made”
- living democracy»Demokratin förutsätter aktiva medborgare och ett levande demokratiskt samtal.« (party programme ↗)“Democracy requires active citizens and a living democratic dialogue.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan establishes that it shall be self-evident that public institutions and information systems are designed with high accessibility requirements, and that voting secrecy shall be protected.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that it shall be self-evident that public institutions and information systems are designed with high accessibility requirements, and that voting secrecy shall be protected. It furthermore wants every citizen to have real participation and that public documents are accessible. The counter-proposal's requirements for adapted polling places and easy-to-read information follow directly from this.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att det ska vara självklart att offentliga inrättningar och informationssystem utformas med höga krav på tillgänglighet, och att valhemligheten ska skyddas. Den vill dessutom att varje medborgare ges verklig delaktighet och att allmänna handlingar är tillgängliga. Motförslagets krav på anpassade vallokaler och lättläst information följer direkt av det.
- high accessibility in societydecisive»att offentliga inrättningar, anläggningar och informationssystem utformas med höga krav på tillgänglighet.« (party programme ↗)“that public institutions, facilities and information systems are designed with high accessibility requirements.”
- protected voting secrecy»Valhemligheten ska skyddas.« (party programme ↗)“Voting secrecy shall be protected.”
- access to public documents»Offentlighetsprincipen, det vill säga tillgången till« (party programme ↗)“The public disclosure principle, meaning access to”
- self-determination with disability»SJÄLVBESTÄMMANDE VID FUNKTIONSNEDSÄTTNING« (2022 manifesto ↗)“SELF-DETERMINATION WITH DISABILITY”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan wants to strengthen liberal democracy and demands that the constitutional protection of rights shall not just be beautiful words but provide practical and effective protection in encounters with municipalities and government agencies.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to strengthen liberal democracy and demands that the constitutional protection of rights shall not just be beautiful words but provide practical and effective protection in encounters with municipalities and government agencies. That polling stations secure ballot secrecy and that government information is made understandable and accessible is exactly such practical protection of the right to vote. The plan does not, however, address disability, so the conclusion is derived.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill stärka den liberala demokratin och kräver att grundlagens rättighetsskydd inte bara ska vara vackra ord utan ge ett praktiskt och effektivt skydd i mötet med kommuner och myndigheter. Att vallokaler säkrar valhemligheten och att myndighetsinformation görs begriplig och tillgänglig är just ett sådant praktiskt skydd av rösträtten. Planen behandlar dock inte funktionsnedsättning, så slutsatsen är härledd.
- practical rights protectiondecisive»Vi måste se till att det inte bara är vackra ord, utan att grundlagen också ger ett praktiskt och effektivt skydd för enskilda människor i relation till exempelvis en kommun eller en statlig myndighet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We must ensure that it is not just beautiful words, but that the constitution also provides practical and effective protection for individuals in relation to, for example, a municipality or a state agency.”
- strengthened democratic foundations»Demokratins grundvalar behöver stärkas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The foundations of democracy need to be strengthened.”
- free and secret elections»i fria och hemliga val.« (party programme ↗)“in free and secret elections.”
- active political participation»Sverige ska ha ett levande politiskt liv« (party programme ↗)“Sweden shall have an active political life”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan states that citizens who face challenges beyond their own control should not be limited in their access to social life, and the party programme is based on universal and equal suffrage as the foundation of democracy.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that citizens who face challenges beyond their own control should not be limited in their access to social life, and the party programme is based on universal and equal suffrage as the foundation of democracy. The plan also wants to strengthen the electoral system so that elections can be conducted reliably, which includes ballot secrecy in the polling place. Adaptations for people with disabilities thus follow from the plan's commitments.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att medborgare som möter utmaningar bortom egen kontroll inte ska begränsas i sin tillgång till samhällslivet, och partiprogrammet bygger på allmän och lika rösträtt som demokratins grund. Planen vill dessutom stärka valsystemet så att val kan genomföras tillförlitligt, vilket omfattar valhemligheten i vallokalen. Anpassningar för personer med funktionsnedsättning följer därför av planens åtaganden.
- access to social lifedecisive»Medborgare som på grund av omständigheter bortom egen kontroll möter andra utmaningar i vardagen ska inte begränsas i sin tillgång till samhälls- eller arbetslivet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Citizens who, due to circumstances beyond their control, face other challenges in everyday life shall not be limited in their access to social or working life.”
- universal and equal suffrage»och allmän och lika rösträtt för medborgare skall råda« (party programme ↗)“and universal and equal suffrage for citizens shall prevail”
- reliable elections»Det svenska valsystemet bör stärkas för att garantera att allmänna val kan genomföras på ett tillförlitligt sätt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Swedish electoral system should be strengthened to ensure that general elections can be conducted in a reliable manner.”
- increased democratic participation»Möjligheterna att stärka inslag av direktdemokrati ska utgöra ett komplement till den representativa demokratin.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Opportunities to strengthen elements of direct democracy shall constitute a complement to representative democracy.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2023/24:KU8)
- Committee report full text (HB01KU8)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2023/24:1123 — Opinionsbildande myndigheter och statliga bolag av Helena Storckenfeldt och Lars Püss (båda M)
- Motion 2023/24:1153 — Precisering av proportionalitetsprincipens tillämpning i förvaltningslagen av Staffan Eklöf (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:1265 — Offentlig information på lättläst svenska av Anne-Li Sjölund och Ulrika Heie (båda C)
- Motion 2023/24:1394 — Begränsning av rätten till tolk av Josefin Malmqvist (M)
- Motion 2023/24:1628 — För ett tryggare Malmö och Sverige av Niels Paarup-Petersen (C)
- Motion 2023/24:1671 — Stärkt demokrati av Alexandra Völker och Azadeh Rojhan (båda S)
- Motion 2023/24:1688 — Införandet av tjänstemannaansvar av Larry Söder (KD)
- Motion 2023/24:173 — Ukrainsk stavning på Ukrainas huvudstad av Markus Wiechel (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:1874 — Statliga jobb och statlig service i hela landet av Amanda Lind m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2023/24:2170 — En säkrare myndighetsutövning av Helena Storckenfeldt (M)
- Motion 2023/24:24 — Åtgärder mot korruption, vänskapskorruption och nepotism inom kommunala och regionala verksamheter av Johnny Svedin (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:2413 — Kampen mot separatismen av Mauricio Rojas m.fl. (L)
- Motion 2023/24:2455 — Digitalisering för hela Sverige av Niels Paarup-Petersen m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2023/24:2490 — Demokrati och konstitution av Malin Björk m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2023/24:2527 — Ett transparent skattesystem av Markus Wiechel och Alexander Christiansson (båda SD)
- Motion 2023/24:2685 — Utgiftsområde 1 Rikets styrelse av Ida Karkiainen m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:415 — Post och it i hela landet av Jimmy Ståhl m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:443 — Regional tillväxt - För ett levande Sverige av Tobias Andersson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:463 — Ett Sverige fritt från rasism av Tony Haddou m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2023/24:468 — Offentlig förvaltning av Matheus Enholm m.fl. (SD)
Source: The Swedish Parliament