2026-05-262025/26:CU39 · p.2CUCivil law & housing
Other Government Bills
Simplified building rules – relaxed accessibility requirements
What's at stake: The decision affects how strict accessibility requirements are when altering buildings, which matters for people with reduced mobility or orientation ability and for older people, while relaxed requirements can reduce costs and obstacles for building projects.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the government's proposal to relax requirements on accessibility and usability when altering buildings should be adopted, or whether it should be rejected in favor of keeping current accessibility requirements unchanged.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee stands behind the government's ambition to simplify the building regulations and considers the relaxation of accessibility and usability requirements to be well balanced, since such requirements can still be imposed on the whole building in new construction and on the part being altered. The committee therefore recommends that the proposal be adopted in full and the motions rejected.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 2 (MP)
The dissenter (MP) wants to reject the relaxed accessibility requirements, since they represent a departure from the principle of universal design, risk affecting people with reduced mobility or orientation ability and older people, and according to several consultation bodies conflict with the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: adopting the government's legislative proposal and rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 2 by MP.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have held
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: VVänsterpartiet
Ja 326–21Ja 305–42
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Yes 21/0/0/0 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| S | No | Yes 106/0/0/0 | differs | confidence: high | not addressed |
| MP | No | No 0/18/0/0 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
| C | No | Yes 24/0/0/0 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 16/0/0/0 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| KD | No | Yes 19/0/0/0 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| M | Yes | Yes 65/0/0/1 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| SD | Yes | Yes 69/0/0/1 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag adopts the government's proposal for 1. an act amending the Planning and Building Act (2010:900) in the parts not covered by the committee's proposal above, 2. an act amending the Act (2006:985) on Energy Performance Certification of Buildings, 3. an act amending the Act (2022:333) on Energy Metering in Buildings. Thereby the Riksdag approves government proposition 2025/26:180 points 1 in this part, 2 and 3 and rejects motion 2025/26:4059 by Amanda Palmstierna et al. (MP) requests 3 in this part and 4.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen antar regeringens förslag till 1. lag om ändring i plan- och bygglagen (2010:900) i de delar som inte omfattas av utskottets förslag ovan, 2. lag om ändring i lagen (2006:985) om energideklaration för byggnader, 3. lag om ändring i lagen (2022:333) om energimätning i byggnader. Därmed bifaller riksdagen proposition 2025/26:180 punkterna 1 i denna del, 2 och 3 samt avslår motion 2025/26:4059 av Amanda Palmstierna m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 3 i denna del och 4.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag said yes to the government's proposal to make rules clearer and simpler when building, modifying, or altering a building. When making a major alteration to a building, the requirements that exist for design and technical characteristics are proposed to be met primarily for the part of the building that is being altered. The possibility of simultaneously imposing requirements on the entire building is limited. Such consequential requirements may only be imposed if needed to address serious risks to health and safety, or to meet requirements for broadband connection, energy efficiency, thermal insulation, and sustainable mobility. The changes also mean that the word "reconstruction" should be replaced with "major building modification". The changes also include certain easings in the requirements for accessibility for people with impaired mobility or orientation. For example, these requirements do not apply when a new dwelling is fitted out in an attic or basement. The new rules come into force on 1 January 2027.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to maintain strict accessibility requirements for housing and reject the relaxed universal design standards. (MP) — Reservation 2
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The party programme wants to create a more inclusive society by making all parts of society accessible and establishes that lack of accessibility leads to poverty and exclusion.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme wants to create a more inclusive society by making all parts of society accessible and establishes that lack of accessibility leads to poverty and exclusion. Easings in accessibility and usability requirements are a departure from precisely that commitment and affect people with reduced mobility or orientation ability and the elderly. The plan therefore supports the counter-proposal's motion to reject.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet vill skapa ett mer inkluderande samhälle genom att göra alla delar av samhället tillgängliga och slår fast att bristande tillgänglighet leder till fattigdom och utestängning. Lättnader i tillgänglighets- och användbarhetskraven är ett avsteg från just det åtagandet och drabbar personer med nedsatt rörelse- eller orienteringsförmåga och äldre. Planen stöder därför motförslagets avslagsyrkande.
- make the whole society accessibledecisive»Vi vill skapa ett mer inkluderande samhälle genom att stärka välfärden« (party programme ↗)“We want to create a more inclusive society by strengthening welfare”
- lack of accessibility excludes»och anpassning leder fortfarande till fattigdom och utestängning.« (party programme ↗)“and adaptation still leads to poverty and exclusion.”
- right to participate in society»På samma sätt ska du som lever med funktionsnedsättning kunna lita på att du får det stöd du behöver, och på att din rätt att delta i samhället på det sätt du vill inte ständigt ifrågasätts och försvåras.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“In the same way, you who live with a disability should be able to rely on receiving the support you need, and on your right to participate in society in the way you choose not being constantly questioned and made difficult.”
- disability perspective everywhere»Funktionshinder är ett perspektiv som« (party programme ↗)“Disability is a perspective that”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan requires that obstacles for persons with disabilities to participate in society are removed and that they shall be able to live their lives like others.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that obstacles for persons with disabilities to participate in society are removed and that they shall be able to live their lives like others. Relaxations in requirements for accessibility and usability instead build new obstacles into the housing stock, which the counter-proposal wants to stop. The plan also requires that substandard housing is addressed.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att hinder för personer med funktionsnedsättning att delta i samhällslivet undanröjs och att de ska kunna leva sitt liv som andra. Lättnader i kraven på tillgänglighet och användbarhet bygger i stället in nya hinder i bostadsbeståndet, vilket motförslaget vill stoppa. Planen kräver dessutom att undermåliga bostäder åtgärdas.
- removed obstaclesdecisive»Undanröjda hinder för personer med funktionsnedsättning att delta i samhällslivet.« (party programme ↗)“Removed obstacles for persons with disabilities to participate in society.”
- live life like others»Personer med funktionsnedsättning ska kunna leva sitt liv som andra.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Persons with disabilities shall be able to live their lives like others.”
- no substandard housing»Undermåliga bostäder och trångboddhet åtgärdas.« (party programme ↗)“Substandard housing and overcrowding are addressed.”
- housing as social right»Bostaden är en social rättighet.« (party programme ↗)“Housing is a social right.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan establishes that building shall promote accessibility and inclusion so that people with disabilities are given real choices, and that society shall be accessible to all.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that building shall promote accessibility and inclusion so that people with disabilities are given real choices, and that society shall be accessible to all. Relaxations in accessibility and usability requirements directly contradict this and affect people with reduced mobility or orientation capacity. The counter-proposal's requirement to reject the relaxations thus follows directly from the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att byggandet ska främja tillgänglighet och inkludering så att även personer med funktionsnedsättning ges reella valmöjligheter, och att samhället ska vara tillgängligt för alla. Lättnader i tillgänglighets- och användbarhetskraven går rakt emot detta och drabbar personer med nedsatt rörelse- eller orienteringsförmåga. Motförslagets krav att avslå lättnaderna följer därför direkt av planen.
- accessible buildingdecisive»inkludering, så att även personer med funktionsnedsättning ges reella valmöjligheter.« (party programme ↗)“inclusion, so that people with disabilities are given real choices.”
- society accessible to all»Vi i Miljöpartiet vill ha ett samhälle som är tillgängligt för alla.« (party programme ↗)“We in the Greens want a society that is accessible to everyone.”
- counteract lack of accessibility»Funkofobi och bristande tillgänglighet ska motverkas.« (party programme ↗)“Funcofobi and lack of accessibility shall be counteracted.”
- strengthened disability rights»förbättra stödet för personer med funktionsnedsättning och sällsynta diagnoser oavsett var du bor i landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“improve support for people with disabilities and rare diagnoses regardless of where you live in the country.”
The plan states that accessibility is crucial for people with disabilities and that society shall have full accessibility, which supports the counter-proposal's demand to reject reliefs.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that accessibility is crucial for people with disabilities and that society shall have full accessibility, which supports the counter-proposal's demand to reject reliefs. The plan also wants those with disabilities to get the support they need. The plan's ambition for simpler building regulations pulls in the other direction, but the accessibility commitment is more specific.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att tillgänglighet är avgörande för personer med funktionsnedsättning och att samhället ska ha full tillgänglighet, vilket bär motförslagets krav på att avslå lättnaderna. Planen vill också att den som har en funktionsnedsättning ska få det stöd hen behöver. Planens ambition om enklare byggregler drar åt andra hållet, men tillgänglighetsåtagandet är mer specifikt.
- full accessibilitydecisive»Tillgängligheten är avgörande för människor med olika funktionsnedsättningar.« (party programme ↗)“Accessibility is crucial for people with different disabilities.”
- support for disability»Du som har en funktionsnedsättning ska få det stöd du behöver, och staten ska ta ett större ansvar för att LSS fungerar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“You who have a disability shall get the support you need, and the state shall take greater responsibility for ensuring that LSS works.”
- protection against discrimination»Mer måste göras mot diskriminering. Vi vill stärka myndigheternas arbete mot diskriminering och höja ersättningen till dem som utsatts, samt lägga till kön och funktionsnedsättning som hatbrottsgrunder.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“More must be done against discrimination. We want to strengthen the authorities' work against discrimination and increase compensation to those who have been subjected to it, and add gender and disability as hate crime grounds.”
- simpler building regulations»Vi ska rensa upp bland överflödiga regler och byråkrati.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We will clean up among unnecessary rules and bureaucracy.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan establishes that Sweden shall be an accessible country and that lack of accessibility shall be seen as discrimination, and that the disability rights convention's article on the right to live independently shall become law.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that Sweden shall be an accessible country and that lack of accessibility shall be seen as discrimination, and that the disability rights convention's article on the right to live independently shall become law. The counter-proposal wants to reject the relaxations in accessibility requirements with reference to precisely that convention and to persons with impaired mobility. The plan's desire to simplify building regulations pulls in the other direction but does not outweigh the accessibility commitment.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att Sverige ska vara ett tillgängligt land och att bristande tillgänglighet ska ses som diskriminering, samt att funktionsrättskonventionens artikel om rätten att leva självständigt ska bli lag. Motförslaget vill avslå lättnaderna i tillgänglighetskraven med hänvisning till just den konventionen och till personer med nedsatt rörelseförmåga. Planens vilja att förenkla byggreglerna drar åt andra hållet men väger inte över tillgänglighetsåtagandet.
- inaccessibility is discriminationdecisive»Bristande tillgänglighet ska ses som diskriminering.« (party programme ↗)“Lack of accessibility shall be seen as discrimination.”
- accessible society»Sverige ska vara ett tillgängligt land. Den offentliga miljön, inklusive kollektivtrafiken, ska vara tillgänglig.« (party programme ↗)“Sweden shall be an accessible country. The public environment, including public transport, shall be accessible.”
- disability rights convention into law»Därför är det viktigt att funktionsrättskonventionens artikel om rätten att leva självständigt och delta i samhället blir till lag, och att funktionsrättsperspektivet alltid finns med när politiska beslut förbereds och fattas.« (party programme ↗)“Therefore it is important that the disability rights convention's article on the right to live independently and participate in society becomes law, and that the disability rights perspective is always present when political decisions are prepared and made.”
- simplified building regulations»Plan- och byggreglerna bör förenklas, överklagandeprocessen förkortas och möjligheterna till att begränsa kommunala särkrav ses över.« (party programme ↗)“Plan and building regulations should be simplified, the appeal process shortened and the possibilities for limiting municipal special requirements reviewed.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The party programme establishes that it shall be self-evident that society is designed with high accessibility requirements, that the UN disability rights convention is a guiding light, and that special consideration must be given to elderly and persons with disabilities.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme establishes that it shall be self-evident that society is designed with high accessibility requirements, that the UN disability rights convention is a guiding light, and that special consideration must be given to elderly and persons with disabilities. Easing accessibility requirements pulls in the opposite direction. The counter-proposal's requirement for rejection therefore aligns with the plan, even though the plan also wants to avoid unnecessary obstacles to building.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår fast att det ska vara självklart att samhället utformas med höga krav på tillgänglighet, att FN:s funktionsrättskonvention är en ledstjärna och att särskild hänsyn måste tas till äldre och personer med funktionsnedsättning. Lättnader i tillgänglighetskraven drar åt motsatt håll. Motförslagets krav på avslag ligger därför i linje med planen, även om planen också vill undvika onödiga hinder för byggande.
- high accessibility requirementsdecisive»Ett annat viktigt sätt att minska funktionsnedsättningens betydelse är att öka tillgängligheten i samhället. Det ska vara självklart att offentliga inrättningar, anläggningar och informationssystem utformas med höga krav på tillgänglighet.« (party programme ↗)“Another important way to reduce the significance of disability is to increase accessibility in society. It shall be self-evident that public institutions, facilities and information systems are designed with high accessibility requirements.”
- disability rights convention as guiding light»En viktig ledstjärna i detta avseende är FN:s konvention om rättigheter för människor med funktionsnedsättning.« (party programme ↗)“An important guiding light in this regard is the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.”
- consideration for elderly and disabled persons»Särskild hänsyn måste också tas till äldre och till personer med funktionsnedsättning.« (party programme ↗)“Special consideration must also be given to elderly people and persons with disabilities.”
- avoid unnecessary building regulations»Krångel och onödiga regler får inte stå i vägen för en kommun att leva upp till sitt ansvar eller för enskildas möjligheter att utveckla sitt boende.« (party programme ↗)“Complications and unnecessary rules must not stand in the way of a municipality meeting its responsibility or individuals' opportunities to develop their housing.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan's building policy is to simplify regulations to get more housing, all the way to abolishing the bathing ban and replacing detailed plans with simpler building plans.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's building policy is to simplify regulations to get more housing, all the way to abolishing the bathing ban and replacing detailed plans with simpler building plans. Relaxations of accessibility requirements are in that direction, while the counter-proposal wants to reject them. The plan therefore argues against the counter-proposal's demands, even if it does not speak to accessibility regulations in themselves.
Original (Swedish)
Planens byggpolitik går ut på att förenkla regelverket för att få fram fler bostäder, ända till att avskaffa strandskyddet och ersätta detaljplaner med enklare byggplaner. Lättnader i tillgänglighetskraven ligger i den riktningen, medan motförslaget vill avslå dem. Planen talar därför emot motförslagets krav, även om den inte uttalar sig om tillgänglighetsregler i sig.
- simplified building regulationsdecisive»Ersätta avancerade detaljplaner med enklare byggplaner« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Replace complex detailed plans with simpler building plans”
- regulatory relief for building»Avskaffa dagens strandskydd för att möjliggöra ökat byggande« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Abolish today's bathing ban to enable increased building”
- acute housing shortage»Det är bostadsbrist i 207 av landets 290 kommuner.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“There is a housing shortage in 207 of the country's 290 municipalities.”
- reforms for more housing»Vi vill genomföra reformer som ökar byggandet av såväl hyressom bostadsrätter.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to implement reforms that increase the construction of both rental and owner-occupied housing.”
flags: citat_migrerat
The election manifesto's housing section explicitly demands that the extensive regulations and requirements governing housing construction be reviewed so that more housing can be built.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto's housing section explicitly demands that the extensive regulations and requirements governing housing construction be reviewed so that more housing can be built. The counter-proposal wants conversely to retain the full accessibility requirements and reject easements, which goes in the opposite direction from the plan's demand for simplified building standards. The plan's commitment on disabled people's living standards softens the assessment but carries less weight than the explicit simplification demand.
Original (Swedish)
Valplattformens bostadsavsnitt kräver uttryckligen att de omfattande regelverk och krav som styr bostadsbyggande ses över för att fler bostäder ska kunna byggas. Motförslaget vill i stället behålla de fulla tillgänglighetskraven och avslå lättnaderna, vilket går i motsatt riktning mot planens krav på förenklade byggnormer. Planens åtagande om funktionsnedsattas levnadsstandard mildrar bedömningen men väger lättare än det uttalade förenklingskravet.
- simplify building rulesdecisive»Sverigedemokraterna vill underlätta bostadsbyggande genom att förenkla och snabba på beslutsprocesser och se över de omfattande regelverk och krav som styr bostadsbyggande.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden Democrats want to facilitate housing construction by simplifying and speeding up decision processes and reviewing the extensive regulations and requirements governing housing construction.”
- review of building standards»Nybyggnation kan underlättas genom att se över byggnormer och öka konkurrensen på byggmarknaden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“New construction can be facilitated by reviewing building standards and increasing competition on the construction market.”
- simplified planning processes»Anpassa och förenkla regler och processer för planering och byggnation« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Adapt and simplify rules and processes for planning and construction”
- disabled people's living standard»Alla medborgare ska ha rätt till ett gott liv och en fullgod levnadsstandard, även om man är född med eller råkar ut för något som gjort att man har fysiska eller kognitiva begränsningar eller variationer.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“All citizens shall have the right to a good life and an adequate standard of living, even if one is born with or encounters something that has meant that one has physical or cognitive limitations or variations.”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:CU39)
- Committee report full text (HD01CU39)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:4010 — med anledning av prop. 2025/26:180 Förenklade regler vid ändring av en byggnad av Joakim Järrebring m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:4059 — med anledning av prop. 2025/26:180 Förenklade regler vid ändring av en byggnad av Amanda Palmstierna m.fl. (MP)
- Proposition 2025/26:180 — Förenklade regler vid ändring av en byggnad
Source: The Swedish Parliament