2025-05-212024/25:TU13 · p.3TUTransport & infrastructure
Financing and support for regional airports
Funding and support for regional airports
What's at stake: The finances of regional airports affect access to air travel for residents and businesses across the country, especially in sparsely populated parts of Sweden that lack other fast transport links.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the state should strengthen national coordination of aviation infrastructure and take further steps to fund regional airports, or whether the current support and grant system together with ongoing review work should be considered sufficient.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee points to the state support that already exists for non-state airports, the increased funding in the latest budget decisions, and the new regulation on state grants, and therefore rejects the motions calling for further funding and coordination.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 3 (S)
The reservation stresses that Sweden is sparsely populated with great distances and strongly dependent on well-functioning air traffic, and calls for strengthened national coordination of aviation infrastructure.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 3 by S.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have gone the other way
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: KDKristdemokraterna, SDSverigedemokraterna
Ja 175–94Nej 96–173
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | Yes | Yes 21/0/0/3 | match | confidence: low | not addressed |
| S | No | No 0/93/0/13 | match | confidence: low | not addressed |
| MP | Yes | Abstain 0/0/15/3 | differs | confidence: high | explicit |
| C | No | Abstain 0/0/21/3 | differs | confidence: high | explicit |
| L | No | Yes 14/0/0/2 | differs | confidence: low | not addressed |
| KD | No | Yes 16/0/0/3 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| M | No | Yes 60/0/0/8 | differs | confidence: low | not addressed |
| SD | No | Yes 63/0/0/9 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
Committee proposal
Parliament rejects the motions 2024/25:1232 by Lars Johnsson et al. (M) point 8, 2024/25:1560 by Helena Lindahl and Daniel Bäckström (both C), 2024/25:1639 by Per-Arne Håkansson and Niklas Karlsson (both S), 2024/25:1771 by Linus Lakso et al. (MP) point 6, 2024/25:1987 by Ann-Sofie Alm (M), 2024/25:2274 by Mattias Eriksson Falk and Roger Hedlund (both SD), 2024/25:2279 by Mattias Eriksson Falk and Roger Hedlund (both SD), 2024/25:2362 by Jesper Skalberg Karlsson (M), 2024/25:2947 by Ulrika Heie et al. (C) points 48, 51 and 67, 2024/25:3126 by Gunilla Svantorp et al. (S) point 58 and 2024/25:3183 by Bo Broman (SD).
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2024/25:1232 av Lars Johnsson m.fl. (M) yrkande 8, 2024/25:1560 av Helena Lindahl och Daniel Bäckström (båda C), 2024/25:1639 av Per-Arne Håkansson och Niklas Karlsson (båda S), 2024/25:1771 av Linus Lakso m.fl. (MP) yrkande 6, 2024/25:1987 av Ann-Sofie Alm (M), 2024/25:2274 av Mattias Eriksson Falk och Roger Hedlund (båda SD), 2024/25:2279 av Mattias Eriksson Falk och Roger Hedlund (båda SD), 2024/25:2362 av Jesper Skalberg Karlsson (M), 2024/25:2947 av Ulrika Heie m.fl. (C) yrkandena 48, 51 och 67, 2024/25:3126 av Gunilla Svantorp m.fl. (S) yrkande 58 och 2024/25:3183 av Bo Broman (SD).
Riksdag decision: The use of and access to sustainable fuels should increase in aviation. Parliament approved the government's proposal which is based on the EU regulation on ensuring equal conditions for sustainable air transport. The proposal means that Sweden introduces the rules required to follow the EU regulation and meet its goal of reducing emissions from aviation. The proposed law contains, among other things, provisions on penalty fees for violations of the EU regulation as well as various regulations on supervision and appeals. The law enters into force on July 1, 2025. Parliament also rejected approximately 80 proposals in motions from the general motion period 2024, among other things with reference to measures taken and ongoing investigation and preparation work. The proposals concern, among other things, state and regional airports, standby airports, security-related issues in aviation, aviation's climate impact and electric aircraft.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to emphasize the need for effective aviation policy for regional airports. (S) — Reservation 3
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan's clearest commitment on aviation is that it is one of the major challenges in the transition and that aviation shall begin to bear its socio-economic costs.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's clearest commitment on aviation is that it is one of the major challenges in the transition and that aviation shall begin to bear its socio-economic costs. A requirement for strengthened national coordination and financing of regional airports goes in the opposite direction. The plan certainly wants the state to take greater responsibility for transport infrastructure across the country, but then points to rail and public transport.
Original (Swedish)
Planens tydligaste åtagande om flyget är att det är en av de stora utmaningarna i omställningen och att flyget ska börja stå för sina samhällsekonomiska kostnader. Ett krav på förstärkt nationell samordning och finansiering av regionala flygplatser går i motsatt riktning. Planen vill visserligen att staten tar större ansvar för transportinfrastruktur i hela landet, men pekar då på järnväg och kollektivtrafik.
- aviation shall bear its costsdecisive»stå för sina samhällsekonomiska kostnader. Det skulle sänka utsläppen« (party programme ↗)“bear its socio-economic costs. That would reduce emissions”
- aviation a major transition issue»Flygtrafiken är en av de stora utmaningarna i omställningen.« (party programme ↗)“Air traffic is one of the major challenges in the transition.”
- public transport and electrification first»en sammanhållen strategi för elektrifiering av transporterna, där stadsplanering, kollektivtrafik och elfordon alla har viktiga roller att spela.« (party programme ↗)“a coherent strategy for electrification of transport, where urban planning, public transport and electric vehicles all have important roles to play.”
- state responsibility for infrastructure»Utbyggnaden av transportinfrastruktur och fiber går alldeles för sakta, staten behöver gå in och ta ett större ansvar för utbyggnaden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The expansion of transport infrastructure and fiber is proceeding far too slowly, the state needs to step in and take greater responsibility for the expansion.”
The party programme establishes that the whole country shall be able to live and that well-functioning transport and communication systems throughout the country are a prerequisite for regionally balanced growth.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme establishes that the whole country shall be able to live and that well-functioning transport and communication systems throughout the country are a prerequisite for regionally balanced growth. The election manifesto promises that the state shall be present throughout the country. Strengthened national coordination of aviation infrastructure in sparsely populated areas follows from this, even though the plan simultaneously prioritises railways. The plan therefore supports the counter-proposal's requirement.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår fast att hela landet ska kunna leva och att väl fungerande transport- och kommunikationssystem i hela landet är en förutsättning för regionalt balanserad tillväxt. Valmanifestet lovar att staten ska finnas närvarande i hela landet. Förstärkt nationell samordning av luftfartens infrastruktur i glesa områden följer av detta, även om planen samtidigt prioriterar järnväg. Planen stöder därför motförslagets krav.
- the whole country shall livedecisive»Alla har ett gemensamt intresse av att hela landet kan leva och utvecklas.« (party programme ↗)“Everyone has a shared interest in the whole country being able to live and develop.”
- state presence throughout the country»Staten ska finnas närvarande i hela landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The state shall be present throughout the country.”
- transport systems throughout the country»Väl fungerande transport- och kommunikationssystem i hela landet är« (party programme ↗)“Well-functioning transport and communication systems throughout the country are”
- railways are prioritised»Genom massiva investeringar i både ny och befintlig järnväg kommer fler att kunna resa klimatsmart med tåg.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Through massive investment in both new and existing railways, more will be able to travel climate-smart by train.”
The party programme explicitly establishes that airports should not be subsidised with public funds, and the election manifesto wants to reduce air travel and instead expand fast rail connections.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme explicitly establishes that airports should not be subsidised with public funds, and the election manifesto wants to reduce air travel and instead expand fast rail connections. The counter-proposal requires strengthened national coordination and support for regional airports, which goes in the opposite direction. The plan therefore speaks against the requirement.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår uttryckligen fast att flygplatser inte ska subventioneras med offentliga medel, och valmanifestet vill minska flygresandet och i stället bygga ut snabba tågförbindelser. Motförslaget kräver förstärkt nationell samordning och stöd till regionala flygplatser, vilket går i motsatt riktning. Planen talar därför emot kravet.
- no airport subsidiesdecisive»Flygplatser ska inte subventioneras med offentliga medel.« (party programme ↗)“Airports should not be subsidised with public funds.”
- reduced air travel»minska flygets utsläpp — höja flygskatten, minska flygresandet och skynda på omställningen till förnybara bränslen, elektrobränslen och elflyg för de flygresor som inte kan ersättas på annat sätt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“reduce emissions from aviation — raise the flight tax, reduce air travel and accelerate the transition to renewable fuels, electrofuels and electric aviation for flights that cannot be replaced in another way.”
- rail instead of aviation»Inom landet och Europa vill vi bygga ut snabba tågförbindelser som ska erbjuda billigare och bekvämare resor än flyget.« (party programme ↗)“Within the country and Europe we want to expand fast rail connections that should offer cheaper and more convenient journeys than flying.”
- rail for rural areas»Kollektivtrafik i allmänhet och tågtrafik i synnerhet krävs för att vi ska kunna arbeta och bo även på landsbygden.« (party programme ↗)“Public transport in general and rail transport in particular are needed if we are to be able to work and live in the countryside as well.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The election manifesto explicitly states that regional aviation holds Sweden together, that aviation infrastructure shall function across the country and that regional airports shall be ready with the right infrastructure.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto explicitly states that regional aviation holds Sweden together, that aviation infrastructure shall function across the country and that regional airports shall be ready with the right infrastructure. The plan also emphasizes that sparsely populated areas' long distances place special demands on communications that political decisions must take into account. The counter-proposal's demand for strengthened national coordination of aviation infrastructure aligns directly with this.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet slår uttryckligen fast att det regionala flyget håller ihop Sverige, att flyginfrastrukturen ska fungera i hela landet och att de regionala flygplatserna ska stå redo med rätt infrastruktur. Planen betonar också att glesbygdens långa avstånd ställer särskilda krav på kommunikationer som politiska beslut måste ta hänsyn till. Motförslagets krav på förstärkt nationell samordning av luftfartens infrastruktur ligger direkt i linje med detta.
- regional airports across the countrydecisive»Det regionala flyget håller ihop Sverige. Flyginfrastrukturen ska fungera i hela landet. Vi vill säkerställa att de regionala flygplatserna står redo med rätt infrastruktur när elflyget utvecklas i snabb takt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Regional aviation holds Sweden together. Aviation infrastructure shall function across the country. We want to ensure that regional airports are ready with the right infrastructure as electric aviation develops rapidly.”
- consideration for rural areas' distances»Sverige är EU:s näst mest glesbefolkade land och det innebär särskilda utmaningar för gles- och landsbygden som politiska beslut måste ta hänsyn till« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden is the EU's second most sparsely populated country and this means special challenges for sparsely populated and rural areas that political decisions must take into account”
- equal services across the country»Offentlig service ska vara nära och pålitlig i hela landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Public services shall be close and reliable across the country.”
- accessibility across the country»Alla delar av Sverige ska se ökad frihet, trygghet och tillgänglighet nästa mandatperiod.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“All parts of Sweden shall see increased freedom, security and accessibility during the next term.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan establishes that Sweden needs continued large investments in infrastructure, that good communications promote freedom and prosperity and that state service shall be secured in the entire country.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that Sweden needs continued large investments in infrastructure, that good communications promote freedom and prosperity and that state service shall be secured in the entire country. Rural areas' dependence on functioning air traffic falls under that principle. Strengthened national coordination of aviation infrastructure therefore aligns with the plan, which however does not mention airports.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att Sverige behöver fortsatt stora investeringar i infrastruktur, att goda kommunikationer gynnar frihet och välstånd och att statlig service ska säkras i hela landet. Glesbygdens beroende av fungerande flygtrafik faller in under den principen. En förstärkt nationell samordning av luftfartens infrastruktur ligger därför i linje med planen, som dock inte nämner flygplatser.
- infrastructure investmentsdecisive»Sverige behöver fortsatt stora investeringar i infrastruktur.« (party programme ↗)“Sweden needs continued large investments in infrastructure.”
- good communications»Människors frihet och välstånd gynnas av goda kommunikationer.« (party programme ↗)“People's freedom and prosperity are promoted by good communications.”
- presence throughout the country»Vägnätet ska fungera och statliga myndigheter ska finnas närvarande i alla delar av Sverige.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The road network shall function and state authorities shall be present in all parts of Sweden.”
- state services throughout the country»Tillgången till statlig service ska säkras i hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“Access to state services shall be secured throughout the country.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The party programme explicitly places state responsibility for maintaining a system of national and regional airports and regionally significant air traffic that does not arise on commercial grounds.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme explicitly places state responsibility for maintaining a system of national and regional airports and regionally significant air traffic that does not arise on commercial grounds. That is exactly the kind of national coordination the counter-proposal seeks for sparsely populated areas with large distances. The plan also requires active regional policy regardless of place of residence.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet ålägger uttryckligen staten ansvar för att upprätthålla ett system av nationella och regionala flygplatser samt regionalt betydelsefull flygtrafik som inte uppstår på kommersiella grunder. Det är just en sådan nationell samordning motförslaget efterlyser för glesbefolkade områden med stora avstånd. Planen kräver dessutom en aktiv regionalpolitik oavsett bostadsort.
- state responsibility for airport systemdecisive»Staten har ett ansvar att upprätthålla ett system av nationella och regionala flygplatser liksom regionalt betydelsefull flygtrafik som inte kommer till stånd på kommersiella grunder.« (party programme ↗)“The state has a responsibility to maintain a system of national and regional airports as well as regionally significant air traffic that does not come about on commercial grounds.”
- necessary domestic air service»Ett välfungerande inrikesflyg är nödvändigt i Sverige med dess långa avstånd.« (party programme ↗)“Well-functioning domestic air service is necessary in Sweden with its long distances.”
- active regional policy»Alla människor ska oavsett bostadsort kunna få del av samhällets grundläggande sociala rättigheter och ges rimliga förutsättningar att försörja sig och utveckla sin bygd. Därför krävs en aktiv regionalpolitik.« (party programme ↗)“All people regardless of place of residence shall be able to access society's basic social rights and be given reasonable conditions to support themselves and develop their region. Therefore active regional policy is required.”
- the entire country shall function»Hela Sverige ska fungera och det ska gå att bo och verka även utanför de stora städerna.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Whole Sweden shall function and it shall be possible to live and work even outside major cities.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan establishes that high-quality infrastructure is important for jobs and growth in all parts of the country and that all of Sweden must function so that one can live and work there.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that high-quality infrastructure is important for jobs and growth in all parts of the country and that all of Sweden must function so that one can live and work there. It treats aviation as prioritized infrastructure and is prepared to classify and prioritize national infrastructure centrally. Strengthened national coordination of aviation infrastructure for sparsely populated areas is in line with this, even if regional airports are not mentioned.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att infrastruktur av hög kvalitet är viktig för jobb och tillväxt i alla delar av landet och att hela Sverige måste fungera för att man ska kunna bo och verka där. Den behandlar flyget som prioriterad infrastruktur och är beredd att klassa och prioritera nationell infrastruktur centralt. En förstärkt nationell samordning av luftfartens infrastruktur för glest befolkade områden ligger i linje med detta, även om regionala flygplatser inte nämns.
- infrastructure throughout the countrydecisive»En infrastruktur av hög kvalitet är viktig för jobb och tillväxt i alla delar av landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“High-quality infrastructure is important for jobs and growth in all parts of the country.”
- all of Sweden should function»Moderaterna vill ta vara på hela Sveriges möjligheter.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Moderate Party wants to take advantage of all of Sweden's opportunities.”
- aviation as prioritized infrastructure»Bygga ut Arlanda med målet att Arlanda ska bli den ledande flygplatsen i Norden« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Expand Arlanda with the goal of making Arlanda the leading airport in the Nordic region”
- national prioritization of infrastructure»Klassa bredband som nationell infrastruktur och prioritera därefter« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Classify broadband as national infrastructure and prioritize accordingly”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto wants to preserve regional airports and give them status as standby airports, and emphasises domestic aviation as central so that people throughout the country can run businesses and stay in touch.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto wants to preserve regional airports and give them status as standby airports, and emphasises domestic aviation as central so that people throughout the country can run businesses and stay in touch. Policy should be conducted for all of Sweden. The counter-proposal's demand for strengthened national coordination of aviation infrastructure in sparsely populated areas thus aligns with the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet vill bevara de regionala flygplatserna och ge dem status som beredskapsflygplatser, och framhåller inrikesflyget som centralt för att människor i hela landet ska kunna driva företag och hålla kontakt. Politiken ska bedrivas för hela Sverige. Motförslagets krav på förstärkt nationell samordning av luftfartens infrastruktur i glesbefolkade områden ligger därför i linje med planen.
- preserved regional airportsdecisive»Bevara de regionala flygplatserna och att göra dem till beredskapsflygplatser« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Preserve regional airports and make them standby airports”
- importance of domestic aviation»Inrikesflyget är även centralt för att människor i hela landet ska kunna driva företag och ha nära kontakt med sina vänner och släktingar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Domestic aviation is also central so people throughout the country can run businesses and stay in close contact with their friends and relatives.”
- threatened airports»Många av landets regionala flygplatser har drabbats av minskat flygande och flera är nedläggningshotade.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Many of the country's regional airports have suffered from reduced aviation and several are threatened with closure.”
- policy for the whole country»Bedriva en politik för hela Sverige« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Conduct a policy for all of Sweden”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2024/25:TU13)
- Committee report full text (HC01TU13)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2024/25:1032 — Minskad ljusförorening genom behovsstyrd hinderbelysning på vindkraftverk av Magnus Berntsson (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:1090 — Namnge Landvetter flygplats efter Evert Taube av Gustaf Göthberg (M)
- Motion 2024/25:123 — Säkerställande av samhällsviktig verksamhet och militär infrastruktur vid Säve flygplats av Rashid Farivar (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1232 — Bättre infrastruktur i Skåne av Lars Johnsson m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2024/25:1234 — Infrastruktur i Västmanland av Mikael Damsgaard och Caroline Högström (båda M)
- Motion 2024/25:1407 — Civilt försvar av Björn Söder m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1427 — En konkurrenskraftig svensk flygindustri av Thomas Morell m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1560 — Ökat driftsbidrag till kommunala flygplatser med statligt upphandlad flygtrafik av Helena Lindahl och Daniel Bäckström (båda C)
- Motion 2024/25:1639 — Statligt övertagande av Ängelholm-Helsingborgs flygplats av Per-Arne Håkansson och Niklas Karlsson (båda S)
- Motion 2024/25:1693 — Skavsta flygplats av Sofia Amloh m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2024/25:1771 — Flyget i en ohållbar tid av Linus Lakso m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2024/25:1772 — Ett utsläppsfritt och transporteffektivt samhälle av Linus Lakso m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2024/25:1840 — Namnbyte från Arlanda till Alfred Nobel Airport av Kristina Axén Olin (M)
- Motion 2024/25:1987 — Regionala flygplatser av Ann-Sofie Alm (M)
- Motion 2024/25:2104 — Skydd mot drönare på svenska flygplatser av Lars Beckman (M)
- Motion 2024/25:2179 — Ökad efterfrågan på biodrivmedel i flyget för att skynda på klimatomställningen av Anders Ygeman och Mattias Vepsä (båda S)
- Motion 2024/25:2262 — Veto mot att ändra verksamhetsinriktning för flygplatser av Mattias Eriksson Falk och Roger Hedlund (båda SD)
- Motion 2024/25:2274 — Statlig drift av fler flygplatser av Mattias Eriksson Falk och Roger Hedlund (båda SD)
- Motion 2024/25:2279 — Samhällsviktiga flyglinjer i Sverige av Mattias Eriksson Falk och Roger Hedlund (båda SD)
- Motion 2024/25:2315 — Blinkande sken från vindkraftverken av Åsa Eriksson m.fl. (S)
Source: The Swedish Parliament