2026-03-252025/26:TU13 · p.4TUTransport & infrastructure
Infrastructure for Cycling
Investment in cycling infrastructure
What's at stake: The outcome affects how quickly and where new cycling paths get built, especially in rural areas and for commuting between towns, and how much of the existing road and rail infrastructure is reused for cycling.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the state should invest more specifically in building out cycling infrastructure, including national cycling routes and cycling highways, or whether the investments already decided in the national plan and regional plans are sufficient.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee rejects the motions for increased investment in cycling infrastructure, pointing out that measures for cycling are already included in both the current national transport infrastructure plan and the regional plans, as well as in the new national plan now being drawn up, and judges that cycling is therefore already well accounted for in planning at both national and regional level.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 10 (C)
The reservation (C) wants a clearer state push on cycling infrastructure: that the Swedish Transport Administration plan more for national cycling routes, that more local and regional cycling paths ('cycling highways') be built to connect regions and ease commuting, that barrier effects from crossing tracks and roads be reduced, and that existing service roads along state roads and railways be converted into safe cycling routes.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 10 by C.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have held
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: LLiberalerna
Ja 149–17Ja 135–31
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Abstain 0/0/19/3 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| S | No | Abstain 0/0/92/14 | differs | confidence: low | not addressed |
| MP | No | Abstain 0/0/15/3 | differs | confidence: high | explicit |
| C | No | No 0/17/0/7 | match | confidence: medium | explicit |
| L | No | Yes 14/0/0/2 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: medium | explicit |
| KD | No | Yes 17/0/0/2 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| M | Yes | Yes 59/0/0/9 | match | confidence: low | not addressed |
| SD | Yes | Yes 57/0/0/13 | match | confidence: low | not addressed |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2025/26:328 by Malin Östh et al. (V) motions 4, 5, 7 and 9, 2025/26:1050 by Jamal El-Haj (-) motion 2, 2025/26:1621 by Mats Berglund (MP) motions 1 and 2, 2025/26:1888 by Magnus Manhammar (S), 2025/26:3276 by Linus Lakso et al. (MP) motions 3, 6, 8 and 9, 2025/26:3278 by Linus Lakso et al. (MP) motion 11, 2025/26:3422 by Katarina Luhr et al. (MP) motion 102, 2025/26:3728 by Ulrika Heie et al. (C) motions 45, 47 and 48, 2025/26:3850 by Aylin Nouri et al. (S) motion 11, 2025/26:3855 by Ulrika Heie et al. (C) motion 7 and 2025/26:3857 by Linus Lakso et al. (MP) motion 7.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2025/26:328 av Malin Östh m.fl. (V) yrkandena 4, 5, 7 och 9, 2025/26:1050 av Jamal El-Haj (-) yrkande 2, 2025/26:1621 av Mats Berglund (MP) yrkandena 1 och 2, 2025/26:1888 av Magnus Manhammar (S), 2025/26:3276 av Linus Lakso m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 3, 6, 8 och 9, 2025/26:3278 av Linus Lakso m.fl. (MP) yrkande 11, 2025/26:3422 av Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP) yrkande 102, 2025/26:3728 av Ulrika Heie m.fl. (C) yrkandena 45, 47 och 48, 2025/26:3850 av Aylin Nouri m.fl. (S) yrkande 11, 2025/26:3855 av Ulrika Heie m.fl. (C) yrkande 7 och 2025/26:3857 av Linus Lakso m.fl. (MP) yrkande 7.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag says no to 104 proposals in motions that deal with cycling issues. The motions were submitted during the ordinary motion period in 2025 and in connection with the government's statement on the Swedish National Audit Office's report on conditions for cycling traffic. The motions deal among other things with goals for cycling policy, regulations for safe cycling, and efforts to encourage more children and young people to cycle. The Riksdag refers primarily to planned and already implemented measures. Furthermore, the Riksdag considers that current infrastructure planning and regulations promote increased and safe cycling. The Riksdag also placed the government's statement on file, which means the matter is concluded.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to establish a national cycling council for coordination and classify cycling as its own traffic mode. (C) — Reservation 10
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan requires a comprehensive and long-term investment plan for transport and societal planning that does not lock people into car dependency.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires a comprehensive and long-term investment plan for transport and societal planning that does not lock people into car dependency. The election manifesto states that the expansion of transport infrastructure is far too slow and that the state must take greater responsibility. Targeted initiatives for coherent cycle paths and reduced barrier effects are a concrete part of that expansion.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver en omfattande och långsiktig investeringsplan för transporterna och en samhällsplanering som inte låser människor i bilberoende. Valplattformen slår fast att utbyggnaden av transportinfrastrukturen går alldeles för sakta och att staten måste ta ett större ansvar. Riktade satsningar på sammanhängande cykelvägar och minskade barriäreffekter är en konkret del av den utbyggnaden.
- long-term investment plandecisive»Det behövs en omfattande och långsiktig investeringsplan för det,« (party programme ↗)“There is a need for a comprehensive and long-term investment plan for that,”
- the state should take greater responsibility»Utbyggnaden av transportinfrastruktur och fiber går alldeles för sakta, staten behöver gå in och ta ett större ansvar för utbyggnaden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Expansion of transport infrastructure and fibre is far too slow, the state needs to step in and take greater responsibility for expansion.”
- break car dependency»att låsa människor i bilberoende. Det behöver bli enklare att röra sig i« (party programme ↗)“lock people into car dependency. There needs to be easier movement in”
- sustainable everyday journeys»Renare storstadsluft, billig och fungerande tåg- och kollektivtrafik.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Cleaner big city air, cheap and functioning train and public transport.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wants climate-smart travel to be the cheaper alternative and for infrastructure to give people throughout the country the opportunity to travel, with major public investment in sustainable transport.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants climate-smart travel to be the cheaper alternative and for infrastructure to give people throughout the country the opportunity to travel, with major public investment in sustainable transport. Targeted investments in continuous cycle paths and reduced barrier effects are in line with this. The plan does not, however, explicitly address cycling infrastructure, so the support is derived.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill att klimatsmart resande ska vara det billigare alternativet och att infrastrukturen ska ge människor i hela landet möjlighet att resa, med stora offentliga investeringar i hållbara transporter. Riktade satsningar på sammanhängande cykelvägar och minskade barriäreffekter ligger i linje med detta. Planen behandlar dock inte cykelinfrastruktur uttryckligen, så stödet är härlett.
- climate-smart traveldecisive»Klimatsmart resande som det billigare alternativet.« (party programme ↗)“Climate-smart travel as the cheaper alternative.”
- better travel opportunities throughout the country»Ökade möjligheter för människor att resa kollektivt i hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“Increased opportunities for people to travel collectively throughout the country.”
- investment in sustainable transport»Genom massiva investeringar i både ny och befintlig järnväg kommer fler att kunna resa klimatsmart med tåg.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Through massive investment in both new and existing railways, more will be able to travel climate-smart by train.”
- access to active leisure»Jämlik och jämställd tillgång till idrotts- och friluftsliv i hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“Equal and equitable access to sports and outdoor life throughout the country.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan explicitly requires more and better cycling paths in both city and countryside and that car use decreases in favour of walking, cycling and public transport.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly requires more and better cycling paths in both city and countryside and that car use decreases in favour of walking, cycling and public transport. The counter-proposal's requirement for national cycle routes, more regional cycle paths, reduced barrier effects and converted service roads are concrete expressions of the same commitment. The plan therefore contradicts the assessment that cycling is already sufficiently considered in planning.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver uttryckligen fler och bättre cykelvägar i både stad och landsbygd och att bilåkandet minskar till förmån för gång, cykel och kollektivtrafik. Motförslagets krav på nationella cykelleder, fler regionala cykelbanor, minskade barriäreffekter och omvandlade servicevägar är konkreta uttryck för samma åtagande. Planen motsäger därmed bedömningen att cyklingen redan är tillräckligt beaktad i planeringen.
- expanded cycling infrastructuredecisive»Vi vill bygga ut kollektivtrafiken kraftigt, göra den billigare och mer tillgänglig, och skapa fler gång- och cykelvägar i både stad och landsbygd.« (party programme ↗)“We want to expand public transport significantly, make it cheaper and more accessible, and create more walking and cycling paths in both city and countryside.”
- cycling before cars»minska bilåkandet i storstäderna och främja gång-, cykel- och kollektivtrafik.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“reduce car use in major cities and promote walking, cycling and public transport.”
- more cycling paths»fler och bättre cykelvägar« (2022 manifesto ↗)“more and better cycling paths”
- reduced car dominance»Staden ska inte domineras av bilar.« (party programme ↗)“Cities should not be dominated by cars.”
flags: citat_migrerat
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The election manifesto explicitly promises better access to cycle paths and upgraded, more traffic-safe roads for all road users, and that it should be easy to choose not to drive a car in favour of cycling.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto explicitly promises better access to cycle paths and upgraded, more traffic-safe roads for all road users, and that it should be easy to choose not to drive a car in favour of cycling. Targeted investments in national cycle routes, regional cycle paths and reduced barrier effects are precisely the infrastructure the plan seeks. The whole country shall have access to reliable infrastructure.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet lovar uttryckligen bättre tillgång till cykelvägar och upprustade, mer trafiksäkra vägar för alla trafikanter, samt att det ska vara smidigt att välja bort bilen till förmån för cykeln. Riktade satsningar på nationella cykelleder, regionala cykelbanor och minskade barriäreffekter är precis den infrastruktur planen efterfrågar. Hela landet ska ha tillgång till en pålitlig infrastruktur.
- traffic-safe cycle infrastructuredecisive»Landsbygden behöver bättre vägar och bättre tillgång till cykelvägar. Vi vill rusta upp vägarna, göra dem mer trafiksäkra för alla trafikanter« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Rural areas need better roads and better access to cycle paths. We want to upgrade the roads, make them more traffic-safe for all road users”
- easy to choose bicycling»Det ska dessutom vara smidigt att välja bort bilen till förmån för tåg, buss, båt och cykel.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It should also be easy to choose not to drive a car in favour of trains, buses, boats and bicycles.”
- more attractive cycling»Utsläppsfria transporter, cyklar, elbilar och kollektivtrafik ska bli smidigare och attraktivare.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Emission-free transports, bicycles, electric cars and public transport shall become easier and more attractive.”
- reliable infrastructure across the country»Hela landet ska ha tillgång till en pålitlig infrastruktur« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The whole country shall have access to reliable infrastructure”
The party programme requires coherent routes for pedestrian and cycling traffic both within and between communities and that the expansion of cycle paths is facilitated, as part of continued large investments in infrastructure.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme requires coherent routes for pedestrian and cycling traffic both within and between communities and that the expansion of cycle paths is facilitated, as part of continued large investments in infrastructure. The counter-proposal's demands for national cycling routes, more regional cycle paths and reduced barrier effects are precisely that expansion. The plan however prioritizes concrete, nearby actions ahead of large-scale prestige projects.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet kräver sammanhängande stråk för gång- och cykeltrafik både inom och mellan samhällen och att utbyggnaden av cykelvägar underlättas, inom ramen för fortsatt stora investeringar i infrastruktur. Motförslagets krav på nationella cykelleder, fler regionala cykelbanor och minskade barriäreffekter är just den utbyggnaden. Planen prioriterar dock konkreta, näraliggande åtgärder framför storskaliga prestigeprojekt.
- coherent cycling routesdecisive»Det behövs sammanhängande stråk för att underlätta gång- och cykeltrafik både inom och mellan samhällen.« (party programme ↗)“There is a need for coherent routes to facilitate pedestrian and cycling traffic both within and between communities.”
- expanded cycling infrastructure»Utbyggnad av cykelvägar ska underlättas.« (party programme ↗)“Expansion of cycle paths shall be facilitated.”
- large infrastructure investments»Sverige behöver fortsatt stora investeringar i infrastruktur.« (party programme ↗)“Sweden needs continued large investments in infrastructure.”
- prioritize concrete action»Vi vill bygga bort järnvägsnätets flaskhalsar och så att tågen går i tid här och nu i stället för att lägga hundratals miljarder på en höghastighetsjärnväg som inte är klar ens om 20 år.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to eliminate railway network bottlenecks and make trains run on time here and now instead of investing hundreds of billions in a high-speed railway that is not complete even in 20 years.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan emphasizes the environmental and health benefits of cycling infrastructure and requires the state to maintain investment levels in communications infrastructure at a high level long term.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan emphasizes the environmental and health benefits of cycling infrastructure and requires the state to maintain investment levels in communications infrastructure at a high level long term. National cycling routes, more regional cycle paths, and reduced barrier effects are such investments that also expand the labor market regions. Cycling infrastructure is not specified in the documents, so the position is derived.
Original (Swedish)
Planen framhåller cykelfrämjande infrastrukturens miljö- och hälsovinster och ålägger staten att hålla investeringsnivån i kommunikationernas infrastruktur långsiktigt hög. Nationella cykelleder, fler regionala cykelbanor och minskade barriäreffekter är sådana investeringar som dessutom vidgar arbetsmarknadsregionerna. Cykelinfrastruktur specificeras inte i dokumenten, så ställningstagandet härleds.
- cycling-promoting infrastructuredecisive»cykelfrämjande infrastruktur är flera, till exempel miljömässiga och hälsofrämjande« (party programme ↗)“cycling-promoting infrastructure provides several benefits, for example environmental and health-promoting”
- high investment level in infrastructure»kommunikationskanaler hålls på en långsiktigt hög nivå« (party programme ↗)“communications channels are maintained at a high level long term”
- commuting and labor market regions»En väl utvecklad kollektivtrafik är av största betydelse för ökat bostadsbyggande« (party programme ↗)“Well-developed public transport is of great importance for increased housing construction”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan's transport commitments cover repairing roads, upgrading existing railways, building out charging infrastructure and Arlanda – cycling infrastructure is not mentioned.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's transport commitments cover repairing roads, upgrading existing railways, building out charging infrastructure and Arlanda – cycling infrastructure is not mentioned. The plan emphasizes that the major needs within the justice system, defence and welfare require hard prioritizations. Targeted new investments in national cycling routes and rebuilt service roads therefore do not fit within the plan, but the conclusion is derived from the prioritization principle.
Original (Swedish)
Planens transportåtaganden gäller att laga vägarna, rusta upp befintlig järnväg, bygga ut laddinfrastruktur och Arlanda – cykelinfrastruktur nämns inte. Planen understryker att de stora behoven inom rättsväsendet, försvaret och välfärden kräver hårda prioriteringar. Riktade nya satsningar på nationella cykelvägar och ombyggda servicevägar ryms därför inte i planen, men slutsatsen är härledd ur prioriteringsprincipen.
- road maintenance is prioritizeddecisive»Laga Sveriges vägar så att du kan komma fram säkert och i tid« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Repair Sweden's roads so that you can get around safely and on time”
- hard prioritizations required»De stora behoven inom rättsväsendet, försvaret och välfärden ställer stora krav på prioriteringar under åren som kommer.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The major needs within the justice system, defence and welfare place great demands on prioritizations in the years to come.”
- existing infrastructure before new construction»Rusta upp dagens järnväg i stället för att satsa på höghastighetståg som riskerar att vara omoderna redan innan de är klara« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Upgrade today's railways instead of investing in high-speed trains that risk being outdated before they are finished”
The plan prioritises upgrading and maintaining existing roads and railways throughout the country ahead of new targeted initiatives, and wants infrastructure policy to be based on ordinary people's everyday life.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan prioritises upgrading and maintaining existing roads and railways throughout the country ahead of new targeted initiatives, and wants infrastructure policy to be based on ordinary people's everyday life. The counter-proposal's demands for national cycling routes, more cycling paths and rebuilding of access roads compete for the same resources without meeting the needs the plan points out. However, cycling infrastructure is not mentioned at all, so the conclusion is derived.
Original (Swedish)
Planen prioriterar att befintliga vägar och järnvägar rustas upp och underhålls i hela landet framför nya riktade satsningar, och vill att infrastrukturpolitiken utgår från vanliga människors vardag. Motförslagets krav på nationella cykelleder, fler cykelbanor och ombyggnad av arbetsvägar tar anspråk på samma medel utan att svara mot de behov planen pekar ut. Cykelinfrastruktur nämns dock inte alls, så slutsatsen är härledd.
- maintenance before new initiativesdecisive»Sverigedemokraterna vill rikta om prestigesatsningar på höghastighetståg till snabbare och mer trängande behov av att rusta upp transportinfrastrukturen inom alla trafikslag.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden Democrats want to redirect high-speed train prestige projects to faster and more urgent needs to upgrade transport infrastructure within all transport modes.”
- prioritised road maintenance»Förbättra underhållet av vägar och järnväg« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Improve maintenance of roads and railways”
- needs-driven infrastructure»anser att infrastrukturpolitiken i högre grad bör utgå från vanliga människors behov och vardag« (2022 manifesto ↗)“believes that infrastructure policy should to a greater extent be based on ordinary people's needs and everyday life”
- upgrading throughout the country»Rusta upp väg- och järnvägsnätet i hela landet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Upgrade the road and rail network throughout the country”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:TU13)
- Committee report full text (HD01TU13)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:1050 — Ett hållbart och tillgängligt transportsystem för framtiden av Jamal El-Haj (-)
- Motion 2025/26:1404 — Mobilförbud på cykel av Johanna Rantsi (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1621 — Nationell satsning på cykelinfrastruktur i Roslagen och liknande landsbygdsområden av Mats Berglund (MP)
- Motion 2025/26:1727 — 1,5 meters avstånd vid omkörning av cyklist av Hans Eklind (KD)
- Motion 2025/26:1888 — Satsning på cykelbanor av Magnus Manhammar (S)
- Motion 2025/26:2056 — Reglerad användning av elsparkcyklar av Anne-Li Sjölund (C)
- Motion 2025/26:3185 — Livskraft och framtidstro på Sveriges landsbygder av Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2025/26:3276 — Cykling på rätt villkor av Linus Lakso m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2025/26:3278 — Ett utsläppsfritt och transporteffektivt samhälle av Linus Lakso m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2025/26:328 — Cykeln - ett centralt transportslag för omställningen av Malin Östh m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:3288 — Ökad trafiksäkerhet för unga mopedister på landsbygden av Camilla Brunsberg och Marléne Lund Kopparklint (båda M)
- Motion 2025/26:3422 — En grön klimathandlingsplan 2026 av Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2025/26:3596 — En folkrörelse för klimatet av Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2025/26:3610 — Skärpta regler för elsparkcyklar, för ökad säkerhet av Lina Nordquist och Cecilia Rönn (båda L)
- Motion 2025/26:3653 — Transportpolitik för Sveriges trygghet, konkurrenskraft och jämlikhet av Aylin Nouri m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:3678 — Förenklade planeringsprocesser för gång- och cykelvägar av Lili André (KD)
- Motion 2025/26:3684 — Fler cykelvägar på landsbygden av Mathias Bengtsson (KD)
- Motion 2025/26:3686 — Införande av hjälmtvång för alla som färdas med elsparkcykel av Dan Hovskär (KD)
- Motion 2025/26:3728 — En infrastruktur som fungerar i hela landet av Ulrika Heie m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2025/26:3850 — med anledning av skr. 2025/26:56 Riksrevisionens rapport om statens arbete med att förbättra förutsättningarna för cykeltrafiken av Aylin Nouri m.fl. (S)
Source: The Swedish Parliament