2026-06-032025/26:UbU22 · p.1UbUEducation
Government's legislative proposal
Adoption of the bill on school safety and classroom order
What's at stake: The bill brings together several changes to strengthen safety and classroom order in schools, including clearer responsibility for school providers and head teachers, and removing the statutory requirement to document classroom removal and detention in writing. The question is whether that specific requirement should be carved out and kept, to protect pupils — for example those with neuropsychiatric disabilities — from being denied support they need.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The reservation called for the bill to be adopted with an addition keeping the requirement to document classroom removal in writing, while the committee wanted to adopt the government's proposal in full without that addition.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee shares the government's assessment that the school law's documentation requirements need to be proportionate to the measures involved and supports removing the requirement to document classroom removal and detention in writing, with the child's best interests and the pupil's age and maturity as the starting point, and wants to adopt the government's bill in full.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 1 (V)
The reserving party (V) supports several of the government's legislative proposals but considers removal from the classroom to be such a far-reaching measure that it should be documented, since otherwise there is a risk that pupils with neuropsychiatric disabilities are discriminated against or do not get the support they are entitled to, and wants to adopt the bill with the amendment that the documentation requirement for that specific measure is kept.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: adopting the government's legislative proposal and rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by V.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | No 0/21/0/0 | follows the plan | confidence: high | derived |
| S | Yes | Yes 106/0/0/0 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| MP | No | Yes 18/0/0/0 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| C | No | Yes 23/0/0/1 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| L | Yes | Yes 16/0/0/0 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| KD | Yes | Yes 19/0/0/0 | follows the plan | confidence: low | derived |
| M | Yes | Yes 66/0/0/0 | follows the plan | confidence: high | explicit |
| SD | Yes | Yes 69/0/0/1 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag adopts the Government's proposal for a bill on amending the Education Act (2010:800). Thereby the Riksdag grants proposition 2025/26:193 and rejects motion 2025/26:4002 by Isabell Mixter et al. (V) request 3.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen antar regeringens förslag till lag om ändring i skollagen (2010:800). Därmed bifaller riksdagen proposition 2025/26:193 och avslår motion 2025/26:4002 av Isabell Mixter m.fl. (V) yrkande 3.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag voted yes to the Government's proposal aimed at creating better conditions for safety and study peace in schools through several coordinated measures. The proposal includes, among other things, that the principal's and rector's responsibility for safety and study peace at the school unit shall be clarified. In addition to preventive work, the principal and rector shall work to maintain safety and study peace. According to the proposal, schools shall be made mobile-free by collecting students' mobile phones at the beginning of the school day and returning them at the end of the school day. The proposal also means that today's rules of conduct shall change their name to school rules, become school-wide and contain a plan for consequences for violations of the rules. The possibilities shall also be strengthened to use the disciplinary measures removal from the classroom, temporary relocation within the same school unit and temporary placement outside the same school unit as well as suspension. The Government also proposes that in certain cases it should become possible to deny a student access to the school unit if the student threatens the safety of other students and staff. The school's expectations of students and their guardians shall be clarified through an expectations document. In addition, it should be possible to conduct emergency school on contract, that is, an activity where students temporarily receive teaching outside their own school unit. The legislative changes come into force on 1 August 2026.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to require documentation when a student is removed from the classroom. (V) — Reservation 1
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan requires that someone living with a disability shall be able to rely on getting the support they need without their right being constantly questioned, which supports the counter-proposal's demand that classroom expulsion continues to be documented so that students with neurodevelopmental disabilities are not discriminated against.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that someone living with a disability shall be able to rely on getting the support they need without their right being constantly questioned, which supports the counter-proposal's demand that classroom expulsion continues to be documented so that students with neurodevelopmental disabilities are not discriminated against. The plan also wants to expand school health services and make early interventions, which requires documented signals. The committee's reasons are based on the child's best interests, a principle the plan explicitly endorses but draws the opposite conclusion from here.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att den som lever med funktionsnedsättning ska kunna lita på att få det stöd som behövs utan att rätten ständigt ifrågasätts, vilket bär motförslagets krav på att utvisning ur klassrummet fortsatt ska dokumenteras för att elever med neuropsykiatriska funktionsnedsättningar inte ska diskrimineras. Planen vill dessutom bygga ut elevhälsan och göra tidiga insatser, vilket förutsätter dokumenterade signaler. Utskottets skäl utgår från barnets bästa, en princip planen uttryckligen bekänner sig till men drar motsatt slutsats av här.
- the right to support must not be undermineddecisive»På samma sätt ska du som lever med funktionsnedsättning kunna lita på att du får det stöd du behöver, och på att din rätt att delta i samhället på det sätt du vill inte ständigt ifrågasätts och försvåras.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Likewise you who live with a disability shall be able to rely on getting the support you need, and on your right to participate in society the way you want not being constantly questioned and complicated.”
- school health services and special support»Det krävs satsningar inte bara på undervisning utan också på elevhälsa, specialpedagoger, fritidsverksamhet och socialt stöd.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Investments are required not only in teaching but also in school health services, special education teachers, recreational activities and social support.”
- strengthened children's rights»Utvecklingen mot starkare rättigheter för barn är en av de progressiva« (party programme ↗)“The development toward stronger rights for children is one of the progressive”
- early interventions»Vänsterpartiet vill se fler lärare, tidigare insatser för barn som har det kämpigt och förbättrad tillgång till lärande genom hela livet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Left Party wants to see more teachers, earlier interventions for children who are struggling and improved access to learning throughout life.”
The plan's core commitment to classroom order is that teachers and other staff can intervene immediately at disruption and unrest, and it opposes more bureaucracy in welfare.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's core commitment to classroom order is that teachers and other staff can intervene immediately at disruption and unrest, and it opposes more bureaucracy in welfare. That speaks for adopting the bill in its entirety rather than retaining the documentation requirement for expulsion. The commitment that students with disabilities shall reach their goals is a counterweight but does not outweigh it.
Original (Swedish)
Planens bärande åtagande om ordningen i klassrummet är att lärare och annan personal omedelbart ska kunna ingripa vid stök och oro, och den vänder sig mot mer byråkrati i välfärden. Det talar för att anta lagförslaget i dess helhet snarare än att behålla dokumentationskravet för utvisning. Åtagandet att elever med funktionsnedsättning ska nå målen är en motvikt men väger inte över.
- immediate intervention at disruptiondecisive»Lärare och annan personal i skolan ska omedelbart kunna ingripa vid stök och oro.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Teachers and other staff in schools shall be able to intervene immediately at disruption and unrest.”
- study peace in schools»Studiero och trygghet i skolorna.« (party programme ↗)“Study peace and safety in schools.”
- less bureaucracy»Villkor ska ställas så att pengarna till välfärden verkligen går till dess medarbetare – inte mer byråkrati.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Conditions shall be set so that money to welfare truly goes to its employees – not more bureaucracy.”
- students with disabilities»Möjlighet för alla barn oavsett funktionsnedsättning att nå målen för sin utbildning.« (party programme ↗)“Opportunity for all children regardless of disability to reach the goals of their education.”
The plan commits that students with neuropsychiatric disabilities shall receive support based on their preconditions and that school shall be accessible for all regardless of functional ability.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan commits that students with neuropsychiatric disabilities shall receive support based on their preconditions and that school shall be accessible for all regardless of functional ability. The counter-proposal wants to retain the documentation requirement for exclusion from the classroom precisely because these students risk otherwise being discriminated against or not receiving the support they are entitled to. This follows from the plan's commitment and from the fact that the child's best interest must be decisive.
Original (Swedish)
Planen åtar sig att elever med neuropsykiatriska funktionsnedsättningar ska få stöd utifrån sina förutsättningar och att skolan ska vara tillgänglig för alla oavsett funktionsförmåga. Motförslaget vill behålla dokumentationskravet vid utvisning ur klassrummet just för att dessa elever annars riskerar att diskrimineras eller inte få det stöd de har rätt till. Det följer av planens åtagande och av att barnets bästa ska vara avgörande.
- support for students with neuropsychiatric disabilitiesdecisive»Elever ska ges inflytande över sitt eget lärande, och de med särbegåvning eller neuropsykiatriska funktionsnedsättningar ska utmanas och få stöd utifrån sina förutsättningar.« (party programme ↗)“Students shall be given influence over their own learning, and those with special gifts or neuropsychiatric disabilities shall be challenged and receive support based on their preconditions.”
- accessible school»Skolan ska vara tillgänglig för alla, oavsett funktionsförmåga« (party programme ↗)“School shall be accessible for all, regardless of functional ability”
- counteract lack of accessibility»Funkofobi och bristande tillgänglighet ska motverkas.« (party programme ↗)“Functionism and lack of accessibility shall be counteracted.”
- the best interest of the child is decisive»Barnkonventionen är svensk lag och barnets bästa ska alltid vara avgörande när beslut fattas kring barn.« (party programme ↗)“The Convention on the Rights of the Child is Swedish law and the best interest of the child shall always be decisive when decisions are made concerning children.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto wants to do more against discrimination and explicitly highlights disability as a protected ground, and promises appropriate support to all students.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto wants to do more against discrimination and explicitly highlights disability as a protected ground, and promises appropriate support to all students. Documentation of exclusion from the classroom is, according to the counter-proposal, precisely what ensures that students with neuropsychiatric disabilities are not missed. The party programme also requires that the school sees every student's opportunities and challenges.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet vill göra mer mot diskriminering och lyfter uttryckligen funktionsnedsättning som skyddsgrund, och lovar rätt stöd till alla elever. Dokumentationen av utvisning ur klassrummet är enligt motförslaget just det som gör att elever med neuropsykiatriska funktionsnedsättningar inte missas. Partiprogrammet kräver dessutom att skolan ser varje elevs möjligheter och utmaningar.
- protection against discriminationdecisive»Mer måste göras mot diskriminering. Vi vill stärka myndigheternas arbete mot diskriminering och höja ersättningen till dem som utsatts, samt lägga till kön och funktionsnedsättning som hatbrottsgrunder.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“More must be done against discrimination. We want to strengthen the authorities' work against discrimination and increase compensation to those who have been subjected to it, and add gender and disability as hate crime grounds.”
- appropriate support to all students»Det vill vi åstadkomma med bättre stöd och fortbildning för lärare och rektorer, och rätt stöd till alla elever.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to achieve this with better support and continuing education for teachers and principals, and appropriate support to all students.”
- see each student's needs»Skolan måste se varje elevs möjligheter och utmaningar att nå sina mål.« (party programme ↗)“The school must see every student's opportunities and challenges to reach their goals.”
- the child's best interests at the centre»Av största betydelse är då barnens rättigheter och perspektiv.« (party programme ↗)“Of paramount importance are the children's rights and perspective.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan establishes that it is the teacher who shall decide in the classroom and that teachers shall be relieved so they can be teachers.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that it is the teacher who shall decide in the classroom and that teachers shall be relieved so they can be teachers. A remaining requirement for written documentation on removal from teaching premises puts administration back on the teacher and risks that the measure will not be used. The plan's commitment to support for all students is instead provided through more special educators and early interventions.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att det är läraren som ska bestämma i klassrummet och att lärare ska avlastas för att kunna vara just lärare. Ett kvarstående krav på skriftlig dokumentation vid utvisning ur undervisningslokalen lägger tillbaka administration på läraren och riskerar att åtgärden inte används. Planens åtagande om stöd till alla elever tillgodoses i stället genom fler speciallärare och tidiga insatser.
- teacher leadershipdecisive»Det är läraren som ska bestämma i klassrummet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is the teacher who shall decide in the classroom.”
- relieved teachers»Lärare ska avlastas för att kunna vara just lärare, kunna göra karriär, få betald fortbildning och få ordentligt bra betalt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Teachers shall be relieved so they can be teachers, can build careers, receive paid professional development and receive decent good pay.”
- easier action against disruptions»Rektorer ska enklare kunna omplacera elever som allvarligt stör verksamhet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Headmasters shall more easily be able to relocate students who seriously disrupt operations.”
- right to support regardless of circumstances»Alla elever har rätt till stöd och utmaningar oavsett individuella förutsättningar.« (party programme ↗)“All students have the right to support and challenges regardless of individual circumstances.”
The plan prioritizes that the school's working environment be pervaded by security, peace and good order and wishes to counter bureaucracy and complicated rules, which argues for adopting the legislative proposal in its entirety without retained documentation requirements.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan prioritizes that the school's working environment be pervaded by security, peace and good order and wishes to counter bureaucracy and complicated rules, which argues for adopting the legislative proposal in its entirety without retained documentation requirements. The plan's strong statements that non-visible disabilities shall give the same right to support qualify the position, but are directed at support measures rather than at the formal requirement.
Original (Swedish)
Planen prioriterar att skolans arbetsmiljö genomsyras av trygghet, arbetsro och god ordning och vill motverka byråkrati och krångliga regler, vilket talar för att anta lagförslaget i dess helhet utan bibehållet dokumentationskrav. Planens starka skrivningar om att icke synliga funktionsnedsättningar ska ge samma rätt till stöd kvalificerar ställningstagandet, men riktar sig mot stödinsatserna snarare än mot formkravet.
- peace and good orderdecisive»Det är viktigt att skolans arbetsmiljö genomsyras av trygghet, arbetsro och god ordning.« (party programme ↗)“It is important that the school's working environment be pervaded by security, peace and good order.”
- against unnecessary administration»Byråkrati och krångliga regler ska motverkas.« (party programme ↗)“Bureaucracy and complicated rules shall be counteracted.”
- support for non-visible disabilities»Även personer med icke synliga funktionsnedsättningar har samma rätt till samhällets stöd som de med mer fysiskt betingade funktionsnedsättningar.« (party programme ↗)“Even people with non-visible disabilities have the same right to society's support as those with more physically determined disabilities.”
- against negative singling out»Personer med funktionsnedsättning riskerar att i olika sammanhang bli negativt särbehandlade.« (party programme ↗)“People with disabilities risk being negatively singled out in various contexts.”
The plan explicitly promises to reduce teachers' documentation requirements and to strengthen teachers' and principals' authority to intervene in disruptive situations.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly promises to reduce teachers' documentation requirements and to strengthen teachers' and principals' authority to intervene in disruptive situations. The counter-proposal wants to keep the documentation requirement precisely when removing a student from the classroom. Since lack of a quiet study environment according to the plan affects the weakest students most, the plan argues against keeping the administration around intervention.
Original (Swedish)
Planen lovar uttryckligen att minska lärarnas dokumentationskrav och att stärka lärares och rektorers auktoritet att ingripa i stökiga situationer. Motförslaget vill behålla dokumentationskravet just vid utvisning ur klassrummet. Eftersom bristande studiero enligt planen drabbar de svagaste eleverna hårdast talar planen emot att behålla administrationen kring ingripandet.
- minskade dokumentationskravdecisive»Minska lärarnas dokumentationskrav« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Reduce teachers' documentation requirements”
- lärarens auktoritet»Stärka lärares och rektorers auktoritet att kunna ingripa i stökiga situationer« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen teachers' and principals' authority to be able to intervene in disruptive situations”
- studiero brister idag»Var tredje niondeklassare upplever att han eller hon saknar studiero i skolan.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“One in three ninth graders experiences that they or she lacks a quiet study environment at school.”
- stöd till elever med störst behov»Vi ska ge bättre stöd till de barn som har det svårast« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We shall provide better support to the children who have the hardest time”
The plan requires that teachers are given increased powers and that the possibility of intervening with sharp measures against students who destroy the working environment for others is expanded, while the teaching profession should be relieved.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that teachers are given increased powers and that the possibility of intervening with sharp measures against students who destroy the working environment for others is expanded, while the teaching profession should be relieved. The counter-proposal wants to retain the documentation requirement for expulsion from the classroom, which preserves an administrative threshold for using the measure. The plan also puts well-behaved students' study peace before disruptive students' needs.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att lärare ges ökade befogenheter och att möjligheten att ingripa med skarpa åtgärder mot elever som förstör arbetsmiljön för andra utvidgas, samtidigt som läraryrket ska avlastas. Motförslaget vill behålla dokumentationskravet för utvisning ur klassrummet, vilket bevarar en administrativ tröskel för att använda åtgärden. Planen sätter dessutom skötsamma elevers studiero före bråkiga elevers behov.
- increased teacher powersdecisive»Ge lärare ökade befogenheter och bättre ställning i sin yrkesroll« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Give teachers increased powers and better standing in their professional role”
- sharp disciplinary measures»Nolltolerans ska råda mot hot och våld i skolan och möjligheten att ingripa med skarpa åtgärder mot elever som skapar en dålig arbetsmiljö för andra ska ses över.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Zero tolerance must apply to threats and violence in school and the possibility of intervening with sharp measures against students who create a poor working environment for others should be reviewed.”
- relief for teachers»Läraryrket ska stärkas med ändamålsenliga pedagogiska verktyg, avlastning och bättre villkor.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The teaching profession shall be strengthened with appropriate pedagogical tools, relief and better conditions.”
- study peace comes first»måste alltid vara överordnad bråkiga elevers behov.« (party programme ↗)“must always take priority over disruptive students' needs.”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:UbU22)
- Committee report full text (HD01UbU22)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:4002 — med anledning av prop. 2025/26:193 Bättre förutsättningar för trygghet och studiero i skolan av Isabell Mixter m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:4018 — med anledning av prop. 2025/26:193 Bättre förutsättningar för trygghet och studiero i skolan av Anders Ygeman m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:4041 — med anledning av prop. 2025/26:193 Bättre förutsättningar för trygghet och studiero i skolan av Niels Paarup-Petersen m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2025/26:4050 — med anledning av prop. 2025/26:193 Bättre förutsättningar för trygghet och studiero i skolan av Camilla Hansén m.fl. (MP)
- Proposition 2025/26:193 — Bättre förutsättningar för trygghet och studiero i skolan
Source: The Swedish Parliament