2026-03-112025/26:SkU15 · p.4SkUTaxation
Other capital taxation matters
Other capital-taxation questions: exit tax, cryptocurrency and dividend withholding tax
What's at stake: Affects anyone with capital income, cryptocurrency holdings, or capital gains earned in Sweden who later moves abroad, as well as savers with investment savings accounts. The question is whether the tax rules should be reformed now or wait for ongoing inquiries to conclude.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether parliament should change capital taxation now - for example the exit tax, cryptocurrency taxation and the dividend withholding tax - or wait for ongoing inquiries and keep today's rules.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee holds that changes to capital taxation affect many people and should be made cautiously and over time. Reform of the ten-year rule for exit tax, simplified tax rules for cryptocurrency, and implementation of the dividend withholding-tax directive are already being prepared within the Government Offices, and the committee does not want to pre-empt these ongoing reviews. Nor should the taxation of investment savings accounts be changed. All the motions are rejected.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 9 (V)
The dissenter (V) wants to fundamentally reform capital-income taxation so that equal incomes are taxed equally, in line with the 1990 uniformity principle that has been eroded by a series of exemptions. Also wants an inquiry into property taxes (property, wealth, and inheritance/gift tax), since Sweden's property taxes are clearly below the OECD and EU average.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 9 by V.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | No 0/18/0/4 | follows the plan | confidence: high | explicit |
| S | No | Abstain 0/0/89/17 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| MP | No | Abstain 0/0/15/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: high | explicit |
| C | Yes | Yes 20/0/0/4 | follows the plan | confidence: high | explicit |
| L | Yes | Yes 13/0/0/3 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| KD | Yes | Yes 16/0/0/3 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| M | Yes | Yes 56/0/0/12 | follows the plan | confidence: high | explicit |
| SD | Yes | Yes 62/0/0/9 | follows the plan | confidence: high | not addressed |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2025/26:1286 by Nima Gholam Ali Pour (SD), 2025/26:2612 by Rickard Nordin (C) motion 2, 2025/26:2783 by Ilona Szatmári Waldau et al. (V) motions 2 and 3, 2025/26:3193 by Lili André (KD), 2025/26:3553 by Niklas Karlsson et al. (S) motions 9 and 11 as well as 2025/26:3554 by Niklas Karlsson et al. (S) motion 3.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2025/26:1286 av Nima Gholam Ali Pour (SD), 2025/26:2612 av Rickard Nordin (C) yrkande 2, 2025/26:2783 av Ilona Szatmári Waldau m.fl. (V) yrkandena 2 och 3, 2025/26:3193 av Lili André (KD), 2025/26:3553 av Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S) yrkandena 9 och 11 samt 2025/26:3554 av Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S) yrkande 3.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected 75 proposals on taxation of business, capital and property in motions from the general motion period in 2025. The proposals concern matters of business, capital and property taxation. The Riksdag refers, among other things, to the fact that the Riksdag has already taken a position on these matters as well as that investigations and preparations are ongoing.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to ensure long-term financing of defense expansion. (V) — Reservation 9
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan explicitly demands higher taxes on multi-million krona inheritances, luxury villas and large capital gains, and that tax levels shall increase especially on large fortunes, properties, inheritances and high incomes so that the richest again pay their share.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly demands higher taxes on multi-million krona inheritances, luxury villas and large capital gains, and that tax levels shall increase especially on large fortunes, properties, inheritances and high incomes so that the richest again pay their share. The counter-proposal's demands for uniform taxation of capital income and an investigation of property taxes is precisely that. The plan gives no support for waiting.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver uttryckligen högre skatt på mångmiljonarv, lyxvillor och stora aktievinster, och att skattenivåerna ska öka framför allt på stora förmögenheter, fastigheter, arv och höga inkomster så att de rikaste åter betalar sin del. Motförslagets krav på likformig kapitalinkomstbeskattning och en utredning av egendomsskatter är precis det. Planen ger inget stöd för att avvakta.
- raised property taxesdecisive»att behöva öka igen, framför allt på stora förmögenheter, fastigheter,« (party programme ↗)“must increase again, especially on large fortunes, properties,”
- tax on inheritance and capital»Vi vill inte höja skatten för vanliga löntagare utan på mångmiljonarv, lyxvillor och stora aktievinster som man inte ens behöver jobba för.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We do not want to raise taxes on ordinary wage earners but on multi-million krona inheritances, luxury villas and large capital gains that you don't even have to work for.”
- the richest must pay»skattesystem där de rikaste åter börjar betala sin del.« (party programme ↗)“tax system where the richest again start paying their share.”
- needs-based tax policy»Vänsterpartiet har en skattepolitik som ser till vilka behov som finns och där de med stora kapitaltillgångar eller höga löner får bidra mer till välfärden än de gör idag.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Left Party has a tax policy that looks at what needs exist and where those with large capital assets or high incomes must contribute more to welfare than they do today.”
The party programme demands increased capital taxation and progressive, equitable taxation according to ability to pay, with broad tax bases, and identifies the unfair difference in taxation between work and capital as a driver of growing inequalities.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme demands increased capital taxation and progressive, equitable taxation according to ability to pay, with broad tax bases, and identifies the unfair difference in taxation between work and capital as a driver of growing inequalities. The counter-proposal's requirement for uniform capital income taxation and an investigation of property taxes follows from this. The fact that the election manifesto opposes a reintroduced property tax pulls in another direction on part of the proposal.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet kräver ökad kapitalbeskattning och en progressiv, utjämnande beskattning efter bärkraft, med breda skattebaser, och pekar ut den orättfärdiga skillnaden i beskattning mellan arbete och kapital som en drivkraft bakom växande klyftor. Motförslagets krav på likformig kapitalinkomstbeskattning och en utredning av egendomsskatterna följer av det. Att valmanifestet motsätter sig en återinförd fastighetsskatt drar åt andra hållet i en del av förslaget.
- increased capital taxationdecisive»Ökad kapitalbeskattning.« (party programme ↗)“Increased capital taxation.”
- progressive taxation»Progressiv och utjämnande beskattning efter bärkraft.« (party programme ↗)“Progressive and equitable taxation according to ability to pay.”
- unfair difference work and capital»Detta är en följd av avreglerade finansiella system, en tilltagande och orättfärdig skillnad i« (party programme ↗)“This is a result of deregulated financial systems, a growing and unfair difference in”
- no to property tax»Vi är emot införandet av en fastighetsskatt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We are against the introduction of a property tax.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The party programme explicitly requires progressive capital and income taxation and states that the principle that all should contribute according to ability must apply to capital.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme explicitly requires progressive capital and income taxation and states that the principle that all should contribute according to ability must apply to capital. The counter-proposal's requirement for uniform capital income taxation and an investigation of property taxes is a direct implementation of that commitment. The election manifesto also binds the party to progressive taxation of capital so that those with the most money contribute more.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet kräver uttryckligen en progressiv kapital- och inkomstbeskattning och konstaterar att principen att alla ska bidra efter förmåga måste gälla kapital. Motförslagets krav på likformig kapitalinkomstbeskattning och en utredning av egendomsskatter är en direkt tillämpning av det åtagandet. Valmanifestet binder dessutom partiet vid progressiv beskattning av kapital så att de med mest pengar bidrar mer.
- progressive capital taxationdecisive»inkomstbeskattning som låter de rikaste bidra mer till det gemensamma, samtidigt som« (party programme ↗)“income taxation that lets the richest contribute more to the common good, while”
- tax according to ability even on capital»ska bidra efter förmåga är grundläggande och måste gälla kapital – både i Sverige och« (party programme ↗)“shall contribute according to ability is fundamental and must apply to capital – both in Sweden and”
- the richest contribute more»att de med mest pengar, som också orsakar större utsläpp, ska bidra mer till omställningen och välfärden genom en progressiv beskattning av kapital« (2022 manifesto ↗)“that those with the most money, who also cause greater emissions, shall contribute more to the transition and welfare through progressive taxation of capital”
- equalising tax system»Skattesystemet ska motverka ett klassamhälle genom att utjämna de ekonomiska« (party programme ↗)“The tax system shall counteract a class society by equalising economic”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The election manifesto promises that the total tax burden shall come down and that the party does not participate in tax increases that damage private saving or make housing more expensive.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto promises that the total tax burden shall come down and that the party does not participate in tax increases that damage private saving or make housing more expensive. An investigation that points to property, wealth and inheritance and gift taxes as too low aims in the opposite direction. The party programme moreover warns against confiscatory taxation and wants to keep the tax burden on entrepreneurship as low as possible. The plan therefore rejects the counter-proposal.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet lovar att det totala skattetrycket ska ner och att partiet inte medverkar till skattehöjningar som skadar det egna sparandet eller gör det dyrare att bo. En utredning som pekar ut fastighets-, förmögenhets- samt arvs- och gåvoskatt som för låga syftar till motsatsen. Partiprogrammet varnar dessutom för konfiskatoriska beskattningar och vill hålla skattebördan på företagande så låg som möjligt. Planen avvisar därför motförslaget.
- no tax increases on saving and housingdecisive»Vi kommer inte att medverka till några skattehöjningar som skadar jobben, det egna sparandet eller gör det dyrare att bo.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We will not participate in any tax increases that damage jobs, private saving or make housing more expensive.”
- reduced total tax burden»Det totala skattetrycket måste ner nästa mandatperiod.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The total tax burden must come down next term.”
- against confiscatory taxation»Brott mot äganderätten, med konfiskatoriska och godtyckliga beskattningar och ingrepp« (party programme ↗)“Infringement of property rights, with confiscatory and arbitrary taxation and interventions”
- low tax on ownership and entrepreneurship»Skattebördan på jobbskapande i företag ska göras så liten som möjligt.« (party programme ↗)“The tax burden on job-creating in business shall be kept as low as possible.”
The counter-proposal wants to investigate reintroduced property taxes and tax capital income more uniformly.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal wants to investigate reintroduced property taxes and tax capital income more uniformly. The plan's decisive commitment goes the opposite way: tax on savings shall be lowered, the first 300,000 kronor on an ISK be made completely tax-free and it shall pay better for the individual to save. The plan's distribution policy aims to fight poverty, not wealth.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslaget vill utreda återinförda egendomsskatter och beskatta kapitalinkomster mer likformigt. Planens avgörande åtagande går åt motsatt håll: skatten på sparande ska sänkas, de första 300 000 kronorna på ett ISK göras skattefria och det ska löna sig bättre för den enskilde att spara. Planens fördelningspolitik syftar till att bekämpa fattigdom, inte rikedom.
- lowered savings taxdecisive»Vi vill sänka skatten på investeringssparkonton genom att bland annat göra de första 300 000 kronorna på ett ISK helt skattefria.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to lower tax on investment savings accounts by, among other things, making the first 300,000 kronor on an ISK completely tax-free.”
- lower tax on savings»I stället för att som regeringen gång på gång höja skatten på sparande vill vi sänka den.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Instead of, like the government again and again, raising tax on savings we want to lower it.”
- saving shall pay»Det ska löna sig bättre för den enskilde att spara.« (party programme ↗)“It shall pay better for the individual to save.”
- fight poverty, not wealth»Den socialliberala ekonomiska politiken syftar till att bekämpa fattigdom, inte rikedom.« (party programme ↗)“Social-liberal economic policy aims to fight poverty, not wealth.”
The plan's decisive commitment is that capital taxes must be competitive and that taxation of wealth and real estate must not hollow out property rights, which are described as a human right with constitutional protection.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's decisive commitment is that capital taxes must be competitive and that taxation of wealth and real estate must not hollow out property rights, which are described as a human right with constitutional protection. An investigation into wealth tax as well as inheritance and gift tax goes in the opposite direction. The counter-proposal's appeal to uniformity is not sufficient, since the plan places the equal treatment principle side by side with protection of ownership.
Original (Swedish)
Planens avgörande åtagande är att kapitalskatterna måste vara konkurrenskraftiga och att beskattning av förmögenhet och fastigheter inte får urholka äganderätten, som beskrivs som en mänsklig rättighet med grundlagsskydd. En utredning av förmögenhets- samt arvs- och gåvoskatt går i motsatt riktning. Att motförslaget åberopar likformighet räcker inte, eftersom planen ställer likabehandlingsprincipen sida vid sida med skydd för ägandet.
- competitive capital taxesdecisive»Kapitalskatterna måste därför vara konkurrenskraftiga.« (party programme ↗)“Capital taxes must therefore be competitive.”
- tax must not hollow out property rights»tjänster, fastigheter, förmögenhet eller andra former av beskattning får inte urholka« (party programme ↗)“services, real estate, wealth or other forms of taxation must not hollow out”
- property rights as a human right»Rätten till egendom är en mänsklig rättighet och därför ska en regel finnas i grundlagen som« (party programme ↗)“The right to property is a human right and therefore a rule must exist in the constitution that”
- taxation according to ability to pay and equal treatment»bärkraft och likabehandling« (party programme ↗)“ability to pay and equal treatment”
The plan introduces a tax-increase cap, promises to stop a reinstatement of property tax and wants to lower the tax on investment savings accounts.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan introduces a tax-increase cap, promises to stop a reinstatement of property tax and wants to lower the tax on investment savings accounts. An inquiry into property taxes - real property, wealth, and inheritance and gift taxes - and a restructuring of capital income taxation directly contradicts these commitments. According to the plan, taxes shall be low, not move towards an international average upwards.
Original (Swedish)
Planen inför ett skattehöjarstopp, lovar att stoppa ett återinförande av fastighetsskatten och vill sänka skatten på investeringssparkonton. En utredning av egendomsskatter - fastighets-, förmögenhets- samt arvs- och gåvoskatt - och en omläggning av kapitalinkomstbeskattningen strider direkt mot dessa åtaganden. Skatterna ska enligt planen vara låga, inte närma sig ett internationellt snitt uppåt.
- nej till egendomsskatterdecisive»• Stoppa återinförandet av fastighetsskatten och sänkta ränteavdrag« (2022 manifesto ↗)“• Stop the reinstatement of property tax and lowered interest deductions”
- skattehöjarstopp»• Införa ett skattehöjarstopp under den kommande mandatperioden som innebär att de samlade skatterna inte höjs« (2022 manifesto ↗)“• Introduce a tax-increase cap during the coming mandate period that means overall taxes will not be raised”
- sänkt ISK-skatt»• Sänka skatten på investeringssparkonton (ISK) – så att du lättare kan spara till en bostad eller till pensionen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“• Lower the tax on investment savings accounts (ISK) – so you can more easily save for a home or for retirement”
- låga skatter»Skatterna ska vara låga« (party programme ↗)“Taxes shall be low”
The plan explicitly wants to stop plans for a reinstated property tax and holds tax levels at a level that does not deviate too much from the rest of the world.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly wants to stop plans for a reinstated property tax and holds tax levels at a level that does not deviate too much from the rest of the world. An investigation of property taxes—property, wealth, and inheritance and gift taxes—with the rationale that they fall below the international average aims at the opposite, namely higher tax collection. The plan is also based on the idea that property rights are a prerequisite for successful societal development.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill uttryckligen stoppa planerna på en återinförd fastighetsskatt och håller skattenivåerna på en nivå som inte avviker för mycket från omvärlden. En utredning av egendomsskatter - fastighets-, förmögenhets- samt arvs- och gåvoskatt - med motivet att de ligger under det internationella snittet syftar till motsatsen, nämligen ett högre skatteuttag. Planen bygger dessutom på att äganderätten är en förutsättning för en lyckosam samhällsutveckling.
- no reinstated property taxdecisive»Stoppa planerna på återinförande av fastighetsskatten« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Stop plans to reinstate property tax”
- competitive taxes»Skattepolitiken måste därför syfta till konkurrenskraftiga skatter som inte avviker för mycket från omvärlden, framförallt de skatter som läggs på företagen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Tax policy must therefore aim for competitive taxes that do not deviate too much from the rest of the world, especially taxes levied on companies.”
- no restrictive taxes»Ha skatter på en nivå som inte hämmar svenska företag i den internationella konkurrensen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Have taxes at a level that does not hinder Swedish companies in international competition”
- property rights as foundation»Sverigedemokraterna betraktar äganderätten« (party programme ↗)“Sweden Democrats regard property rights”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:SkU15)
- Committee report full text (HD01SkU15)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:1149 — Beskattning av ersättning för nekad avverkning av Isak From och Helén Pettersson (båda S)
- Motion 2025/26:1168 — Förändring av 3:12-reglerna av Adrian Magnusson och Niklas Sigvardsson (båda S)
- Motion 2025/26:1286 — Inflationsjustering av kapitalinkomstskatter av Nima Gholam Ali Pour (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:134 — Ökat ränteavdrag för unga föräldrar av Josef Fransson (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:1343 — Stärkt givande genom tillfälliga skatteavdrag vid katastrofer av Magnus Berntsson (KD)
- Motion 2025/26:1344 — Sänkt reavinstbeskattning av Hans Eklind och Larry Söder (båda KD)
- Motion 2025/26:135 — Slopad stämpelskatt för unga husköpare av Josef Fransson (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:136 — Inflationsjustering av skatt på kapitalvinst för bostäder av Josef Fransson (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:1681 — Förenklade beskattningsregler för kombinationsföretag inom lantbruket av Ludvig Ceimertz m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2025/26:177 — Skatteflykt av Ilona Szatmári Waldau m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:1999 — Investeringar som gynnar tillväxt av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2012 — Attraktivt att sponsra ungdomsföreningsliv av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2193 — Differentierad reavinstskatt vid försäljning av bostad av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2239 — Förenklade regler för familjeföretag av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2444 — Avdrag för sponsring av föreningsliv av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2608 — En mer jämställd och lokalt anpassad sponsring av idrott av Rickard Nordin (C)
- Motion 2025/26:2612 — Införande av bitcoin i valutareserven och skattebefrielse för små kryptobetalningar av Rickard Nordin (C)
- Motion 2025/26:2635 — Beskattning av naturvårdsavtal av Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist och Anders W Jonsson (båda C)
- Motion 2025/26:2780 — Transporteffektivt och hållbart samhälle av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:2783 — Ett rättvist skattesystem av Ilona Szatmári Waldau m.fl. (V)
Source: The Swedish Parliament