2026-03-042025/26:FiU36 · p.2FiUEconomy & finance

Evaluation of the measures

Evaluation of eased mortgage and macroprudential rules

What's at stake: The outcome affects how closely it will be checked whether looser lending rules actually help more people access the housing market, or simply push up prices and debt. It concerns home buyers, household debt levels and financial stability.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is whether the government should be required to carry out a dedicated evaluation of the eased mortgage and macroprudential rules, or whether the ordinary follow-up of legislation is sufficient.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The Committee rejects the demand for a dedicated evaluation and instead expects the government to follow up and evaluate the legislation through its ordinary processes when there is reason to.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 1 (S, MP)

The government should return with an evaluation of the eased mortgage rules focused on whether more people actually gain access to the housing market — rather than just higher prices and debt — and should also evaluate the other changes in light of the need for a sound amortization culture and financial stability.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by S, MP.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
VNoNo 0/19/0/3follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
Sown reservationNoNo 0/93/0/13follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
MPown reservationNoNo 0/15/0/3follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
CYesYes 21/0/0/3follows the planconfidence: lownot addressed
LNoYes 14/0/0/2departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
KDNoYes 16/0/0/3departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived
MNoYes 60/0/0/8departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
SDNoYes 61/0/0/10departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed

Committee proposal

The Riksdag rejects motion 2025/26:3911 by Mikael Damberg and others (S) claims 1 and 2.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motion 2025/26:3911 av Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S) yrkandena 1 och 2.

Riksdag decision: The Riksdag agreed with the government's proposals concerning changes to amortization requirements and mortgage ceiling. The proposals include, among other things, that the mortgage ceiling is raised from 85 to 90 percent of the residential property's market value when purchasing a new residence, while the possibility to increase one's mortgage with a so-called supplementary loan is limited to 80 percent of the residential property's market value. Supplementary loans can, for example, be used to renovate the residence. According to the proposals, the so-called heightened amortization requirement shall also be removed, that is the requirement for additional amortization of at least 1 percent if the borrower's total residential loans exceed 4.5 times gross annual income. The original amortization requirement governed by the loan-to-value ratio remains. The proposals also mean that a new law on the limitation of residential credit replaces the Financial Supervisory Authority's regulations and general advice on amortization requirements and mortgage ceiling. The purpose of the proposals is, among other things, to reduce thresholds on the housing market and for more people to be able to own their residence. The new law and legislative amendments enter into force on April 1, 2026.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoNofollows the plannot addressed

The plan states that indebtedness weakens people's independence and that regulation of loan terms should be based on common needs rather than financial capital's.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan states that indebtedness weakens people's independence and that regulation of loan terms should be based on common needs rather than financial capital's. An evaluation that tests whether the reliefs actually give more access to the housing market, instead of just higher prices and indebtedness, is exactly the testing the plan demands. The election manifesto also describes how the housing market has been left to the market with rising prices and housing costs as a result.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att skuldsättning försvagar människors självständighet och att regleringen av lånevillkor ska utgå från gemensamma behov snarare än finanskapitalets. En utvärdering som prövar om lättnaderna verkligen ger fler tillgång till bostadsmarknaden, i stället för bara högre priser och skuldsättning, är precis den prövning planen efterfrågar. Valplattformen beskriver också hur bostadsmarknaden lämnats åt marknaden med stigande priser och boendekostnader som följd.

  • indebtedness weakens peopledecisive»Skuldsättning försvagar många människors självständighet och« (party programme ↗)“Indebtedness weakens many people's independence and”
  • loan terms based on common needs»Regleringen av lånevillkor behöver utgå från« (party programme ↗)“Regulation of loan terms needs to be based on”
  • market-driven housing market»Byggtakten har hållits nere för att bostadspriserna ska fortsätta att stiga, hyresgäster krävs på allt högre hyror medan den som köper bostadsrätt lägger allt större del av sin inkomst på bostaden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The building rate has been kept low so that housing prices continue to rise, tenants are charged increasingly higher rents while those who buy housing cooperatives put an increasingly large part of their income on housing.”
  • market-controlled housing increases inequality»efter att också bostäderna lämnats åt marknaden ökar bostadsbristen, boendekostnader och segregation« (2022 manifesto ↗)“after housing has also been left to the market, housing shortages, housing costs and segregation increase”
SSocialdemokraternaNoNofollows the plannot addressed

The plan sees housing as a social right and particularly identifies young people without capital as losers on the housing market, while warning that loan-driven policy leads to higher interest rates and prices.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan sees housing as a social right and particularly identifies young people without capital as losers on the housing market, while warning that loan-driven policy leads to higher interest rates and prices. An evaluation of whether the reliefs actually provide more access to the housing market rather than just higher prices and indebtedness addresses both these commitments. However, the plan does not mention amortization rules.

Original (Swedish)

Planen ser bostaden som en social rättighet och pekar särskilt ut unga utan kapital som förlorare på bostadsmarknaden, samtidigt som den varnar för att lånedriven politik ger högre räntor och priser. En utvärdering av om lättnaderna faktiskt ger fler tillgång till bostadsmarknaden i stället för bara högre priser och skuldsättning svarar mot båda dessa åtaganden. Planen nämner dock inte amorteringsreglerna.

  • housing a social rightdecisive»Bostaden är en social rättighet.« (party programme ↗)“Housing is a social right.”
  • young people's access to the housing market»Särskilt unga som saknar tillgång till kapital har svårt« (party programme ↗)“Especially young people without access to capital have difficulty”
  • warning against increased indebtedness»Om partier skulle bjuda över varandra med lånade pengar slutar det med högre bolåneräntor och ännu högre priser.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“If parties bid against each other with borrowed money it ends with higher mortgage rates and even higher prices.”
  • state support against housing shortage»Statligt stöd för att häva bostadsbristen, särskilt för unga.« (party programme ↗)“State support to address the housing shortage, especially for young people.”
MPMiljöpartietNoNofollows the plannot addressed

The plan wants to reinstate housing as a social right and notes that many cannot find a home they can afford, while the financial system shall be a driver of social development and not a source of instability.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants to reinstate housing as a social right and notes that many cannot find a home they can afford, while the financial system shall be a driver of social development and not a source of instability. An evaluation of whether the easements actually give more access to the housing market, rather than just higher prices and debt, tests precisely what the plan cares about. The election manifesto also stipulates that it should not require rich parents or inheritance to get a home.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill återupprätta bostaden som en social rättighet och konstaterar att många inte hittar en bostad de har råd med, samtidigt som det finansiella systemet ska vara en drivkraft för samhällsutveckling och inte en källa till instabilitet. En utvärdering av om lättnaderna faktiskt ger fler tillgång till bostadsmarknaden, snarare än bara högre priser och skuldsättning, prövar precis det planen bryr sig om. Valmanifestet slår också fast att det inte ska krävas rika föräldrar eller arv för att få en bostad.

  • financial stabilitydecisive»Det finansiella systemet ska vara en drivkraft för samhällsutveckling – inte en källa till instabilitet.« (party programme ↗)“The financial system shall be a driver of social development – not a source of instability.”
  • homes people can afford»Bostadsbristen är utbredd i stora delar av landet, och många har svårt att hitta en bostad som de har råd med.« (party programme ↗)“Housing shortage is widespread in large parts of the country, and many have difficulty finding a home they can afford.”
  • housing as social right»Miljöpartiet vill återupprätta bostaden som en social rättighet.« (party programme ↗)“The Greens want to reinstate housing as a social right.”
  • equal access to housing»Det ska inte krävas rika föräldrar eller ett stort arv för att kunna få en bostad.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It should not require rich parents or a large inheritance to be able to get a home.”
CCenterpartietYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The plan wants to abolish the strengthened amortisation requirement, which is described as forced saving for those with the lowest incomes, and make it easier for young people saving for their first home.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants to abolish the strengthened amortisation requirement, which is described as forced saving for those with the lowest incomes, and make it easier for young people saving for their first home. An evaluation that starts from the need for a sound amortisation culture and suspects that the reliefs only give higher prices and indebtedness points in the opposite direction from the plan's requirement. The plan's commitment to financial stability however partially supports the counter-proposal, which is why certainty is low.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill avskaffa det förstärkta amorteringskravet, som beskrivs som ett påtvingat sparande för dem med lägst inkomster, och underlätta för unga som sparar till sin första bostad. En utvärdering som utgår från behovet av en sund amorteringskultur och misstänker att lättnaderna bara ger högre priser och skuldsättning pekar i motsatt riktning mot planens krav. Planens åtagande om finansiell stabilitet talar dock delvis för motförslaget, varför säkerheten är låg.

  • abolish the amortisation requirementdecisive»Det förstärkta amorteringskravet — ett påtvingat sparande för dem med lägst inkomster — bör avskaffas när ränteläget nu normaliseras.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The strengthened amortisation requirement — forced saving for those with the lowest incomes — should be abolished as interest rates now normalise.”
  • eased mortgage conditions»Därför vill vi se över amorteringskravet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Therefore we want to look at the amortisation requirement.”
  • young people into the housing market»Det handlar bland annat om ensamstående föräldrar, småbarnsfamiljer och unga som försöker spara ihop till sin första bostad.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“This includes among others single parents, young families with small children and young people trying to save for their first home.”
  • financial stability»Det finanspolitiska ramverket ska värnas och förstärkas, och Sveriges långsiktiga ekonomiska stabilitet ska försvaras.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The fiscal policy framework shall be protected and strengthened, and Sweden's long-term economic stability shall be defended.”
LLiberalernaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan wants to abolish the increased amortisation requirement with the explicit aim that more people can afford homes and enter the housing market.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants to abolish the increased amortisation requirement with the explicit aim that more people can afford homes and enter the housing market. An evaluation that tests precisely whether the easings give more access to the housing market rather than only higher prices and debt thus measures the plan's own goal. The plan says nothing about the need for a special evaluation, however, so support is weak.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill slopa det förhöjda amorteringskravet med det uttryckliga syftet att fler ska få råd med bostad och komma in på bostadsmarknaden. En utvärdering som prövar just om lättnaderna ger fler tillträde till bostadsmarknaden snarare än enbart högre priser och skuldsättning mäter därmed planens eget mål. Planen säger däremot inget om behovet av en särskild utvärdering, varför stödet är svagt.

  • abolished increased amortisation requirementdecisive»Vi vill införa en stimulans för att spara ihop till den första insatsen, slopa det förhöjda amorteringskravet, korta överklagandeprocesserna och fortsätta förenkla byggreglerna.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to introduce an incentive to save for the first down payment, abolish the increased amortisation requirement, shorten appeals processes and continue to simplify building regulations.”
  • more should be able to afford homes»Så får vi fler nya bostäder och fler som har råd med bostäder.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“So we get more new homes and more who can afford homes.”
  • entry into housing market»Bostadsmarknaden på expansiva orter präglas av inlåsningseffekter och stelhet. Detta drabbar särskilt dem som vill få fotfäste och komma in på bostadsmarknaden: ungdomar, invandrare och nyinflyttade.« (party programme ↗)“The housing market in expansive areas is characterised by lock-in effects and rigidity. This hits especially those who want to get a foothold and enter the housing market: young people, immigrants and new arrivals.”
  • saving shall pay»Det ska löna sig bättre för den enskilde att spara.« (party programme ↗)“It shall pay better for the individual to save.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

KDKristdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan makes evaluation, cost monitoring and quality control important political tasks, and requires high household savings while rejecting an economy marked by speculation and irresponsibility.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan makes evaluation, cost monitoring and quality control important political tasks, and requires high household savings while rejecting an economy marked by speculation and irresponsibility. Testing whether the reliefs actually provide more access to the housing market, rather than just higher prices and debt, directly answers these commitments and the plan's will for more people to be able to own their home.

Original (Swedish)

Planen gör utvärdering, kostnadsuppföljning och kvalitetskontroll till viktiga politiska uppgifter, och kräver ett högt hushållssparande samtidigt som den vänder sig mot en ekonomi präglad av spekulation och ansvarslöshet. Att pröva om lättnaderna faktiskt ger fler tillgång till bostadsmarknaden, snarare än bara högre priser och skuldsättning, svarar direkt mot dessa åtaganden och mot planens vilja att fler ska kunna äga sin bostad.

  • evaluation is a political taskdecisive»kostnadsuppföljning och kvalitetskontroll är därför viktiga politiska uppgifter.« (party programme ↗)“cost monitoring and quality control are therefore important political tasks.”
  • high household savings»Sparandet i den svenska ekonomin måste hållas högt genom hushållssparande och genom« (party programme ↗)“Savings in the Swedish economy must be kept high through household savings and through”
  • against speculation and irresponsibility»En ekonomi präglad av inflation och spekulation, ansvarslöshet« (party programme ↗)“An economy marked by inflation and speculation, irresponsibility”
  • more people shall be able to own their home»är det angeläget att ge dem som så önskar möjlighet att äga sin bostad.« (party programme ↗)“it is important to give those who wish it the opportunity to own their home.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MModeraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The counter-proposal requires an evaluation of whether the easements actually give more access to the housing market and not just higher prices and indebtedness.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The counter-proposal requires an evaluation of whether the easements actually give more access to the housing market and not just higher prices and indebtedness. The party programme makes exactly this a moderate method: a reform-oriented party should be constantly ready to evaluate and reconsider what has been implemented. The plan moreover requires order and stability in the economy, while the goal that more should be able to own their home remains firm.

Original (Swedish)

Motförslaget kräver en utvärdering av om lättnaderna faktiskt ger fler tillträde till bostadsmarknaden och inte bara högre priser och skuldsättning. Idéprogrammet gör just detta till en moderat metod: ett reforminriktat parti ska ha ständig beredskap att utvärdera och ompröva det som genomförts. Planen kräver dessutom ordning och reda i ekonomin, samtidigt som målet att fler ska kunna äga sin bostad ligger fast.

  • evaluate and reconsider reformsdecisive»Ett reforminriktat liberalkonservativt parti har ständig« (party programme ↗)“A reform-oriented liberal-conservative party has constant”
  • financial stability»I tuffa ekonomiska tider krävs ordning och reda i ekonomin.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“In tough economic times, order and stability in the economy is required.”
  • more should be able to own their home»I Moderaternas Sverige ska alla våga drömma om att äga sin egen bostad.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“In the Moderate Party's Sweden everyone should dare to dream of owning their own home.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

SDSverigedemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan requires clear results for every public investment, which directly supports an evaluation of whether the reliefs actually give more access to the housing market.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan requires clear results for every public investment, which directly supports an evaluation of whether the reliefs actually give more access to the housing market. The plan also wants to improve opportunities for young people and first-time buyers to acquire housing through more financing options, which is exactly what the evaluation should test. A follow-up that distinguishes actual access from merely higher prices and debt thus aligns with the plan.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver tydliga resultat för varje offentlig satsning, vilket direkt stödjer en utvärdering av om lättnaderna faktiskt ger fler tillträde till bostadsmarknaden. Planen vill dessutom förbättra ungas och förstagångsköpares möjligheter att skaffa bostad genom fler finansieringsformer, vilket är precis det utfall utvärderingen ska pröva. En uppföljning som skiljer verklig tillgång från enbart högre priser och skuldsättning ligger därför i linje med planen.

  • results requirements for reformsdecisive»Begära tydliga resultat för varje offentlig satsning« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Demand clear results for every public investment”
  • young people onto the housing market»Förbättra möjligheterna för unga att skaffa sin första bostad« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Improve opportunities for young people to acquire their first home”
  • more financing options»Sverigedemokraterna vill stoppa planerna på återinförd fastighetsskatt, sänka elpriserna och möjliggöra fler finansieringsformer för unga och förstagångsköpare av bostäder.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden Democrats want to stop plans for a reinstated property tax, lower electricity prices, and enable more financing options for young people and first-time homebuyers.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament