2024-02-282023/24:UbU12 · p.8UbUEducation
Drug testing in the school system
Drug testing in schools
What's at stake: Drug testing in schools raises questions about pupils' privacy and legal safeguards on one hand, and the school's ability to detect and intervene early against young people's drug use on the other. The outcome therefore affects pupils, guardians and school staff nationwide.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the government should be urged to consider introducing drug testing in schools when there is suspicion that a pupil is under the influence of drugs, or whether the current rules on drug testing of pupils should remain unchanged without any such call for action.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee refers to its account of the current legal framework on the possibilities for drug testing pupils and, against that background, rejects the motions calling for drug testing to be introduced in schools.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 8 (SD)
The reservation (SD) calls for the government to consider introducing drug testing in schools when there is suspicion that pupils are under the influence of drugs. The reasoning is that surveys show a significant share of ninth-graders have at some point used drugs or been offered them, and that young people's drug use must be countered wherever it occurs - schools should not be a safe haven for it.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 8 by SD.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | Yes | Yes 19/0/0/5 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| S | No | Yes 92/0/0/14 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| MP | Yes | Yes 15/0/0/3 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| C | Yes | Yes 19/0/0/5 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 12/0/0/4 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| KD | No | Yes 16/0/0/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| M | No | Yes 59/0/0/9 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| SD | No | No 0/61/0/11 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
Committee proposal
Parliament rejects the motions 2023/24:367 by Patrick Reslow et al. (SD) claim 21, 2023/24:368 by Patrick Reslow et al. (SD) claim 10 and 2023/24:2095 by Roger Hedlund and Mattias Eriksson Falk (both SD).
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2023/24:367 av Patrick Reslow m.fl. (SD) yrkande 21, 2023/24:368 av Patrick Reslow m.fl. (SD) yrkande 10 och 2023/24:2095 av Roger Hedlund och Mattias Eriksson Falk (båda SD).
Riksdag decision: Parliament rejected 57 proposals in motions about secondary school from the general motion period 2023. The motions deal, among other things, with education in secondary school as well as educational and career guidance and drug testing in the school system. Parliament refers, among other things, to ongoing investigations.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to introduce apprenticeships and technology colleges to meet companies' needs for skilled workers. (SD) — Reservation 8
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan rejects repression and harder measures as a response to drugs and instead demands resources for school, leisure activities and social services, while also valuing a broad private sphere and the principle that people should be presumed innocent until proven guilty.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan rejects repression and harder measures as a response to drugs and instead demands resources for school, leisure activities and social services, while also valuing a broad private sphere and the principle that people should be presumed innocent until proven guilty. Drug tests of students under suspicion are a control measure directed at individual children. The plan therefore speaks against the counter-proposal's demands.
Original (Swedish)
Planen avvisar repression och hårdare tag som svar på droger och kräver i stället resurser till skola, fritidsverksamhet och socialtjänst, samtidigt som den värnar en bred privat sfär och principen om att människor ska anses oskyldiga tills motsatsen är bevisad. Drogtester av elever vid misstanke är en kontrollåtgärd riktad mot enskilda barn. Planen talar därför mot motförslagets krav.
- prevention ahead of repressiondecisive»Alltför ofta lyfts repression och hårdare tag upp som lösningar istället för att ta itu med problemen på allvar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Far too often repression and harder measures are raised as solutions instead of tackling the problems seriously.”
- protection of privacyweak support»Alla människor har rätt till en bred privat sfär« (party programme ↗)“All people have the right to a broad private sphere”
- innocent until proven guilty»anses oskyldiga tills motsatsen är bevisad måste lyftas fram som« (party programme ↗)“presumed innocent until proven guilty must be emphasized as”
- resources for school and social services»Skola och fritidsverksamheter behöver ges bättre resurser, likaså socialtjänsten.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Schools and leisure activities need better resources, as does social services.”
flags: citat_svagt
The plan makes the fight against drugs uncompromising and states that children and young people have the right to an upbringing free from drugs, and that recruitment to crime must be stopped through close cooperation between school, school health services and social services.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan makes the fight against drugs uncompromising and states that children and young people have the right to an upbringing free from drugs, and that recruitment to crime must be stopped through close cooperation between school, school health services and social services. Drug testing on suspicion in school is a means in the same direction, and the plan means that society should respond clearly to rule violations. However, the plan does not address drug testing as a measure, so the support is derived.
Original (Swedish)
Planen gör kampen mot narkotikan kompromisslös och slår fast att barn och unga har rätt till en uppväxt fri från droger, samt att nyrekryteringen till kriminalitet måste stoppas genom nära samverkan mellan skola, elevhälsa och socialtjänst. Drogtester vid misstanke i skolan är ett medel i samma riktning, och planen menar att samhället tydligt ska reagera mot regelöverträdelser. Planen behandlar dock inte drogtester som åtgärd, så stödet är härlett.
- upbringing free from drugsdecisive»trygg uppväxt fri från droger och våld.« (party programme ↗)“safe upbringing free from drugs and violence.”
- stop recruitment to crime»Ingen ung ska bli kriminell. Nyrekryteringen måste stoppas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“No young person shall become criminal. Recruitment must be stopped.”
- cooperation around young people»Det behövs mer samarbete mellan polis, elevhälsa, socialtjänst och skola.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“There is a need for more cooperation between police, school health services, social services and school.”
- clear response to rule violations»Samhället måste reagera tydligt mot brott och regelöverträdelser.« (party programme ↗)“Society must respond clearly to crime and rule violations.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan opposes disproportionate intrusions into personal integrity and wants to shift focus in drug policy from punishment and control to care, with police operations directed at selling and trafficking.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan opposes disproportionate intrusions into personal integrity and wants to shift focus in drug policy from punishment and control to care, with police operations directed at selling and trafficking. Drug testing of students in schools is a control measure against individual young people that does not have support in that commitment. The plan instead bases the school's role on trusting relationships and preventive work.
Original (Swedish)
Planen motsätter sig oproportionerliga ingrepp i den personliga integriteten och vill flytta fokus i narkotikapolitiken från straff och kontroll till vård, med polisens insatser riktade mot försäljning och langning. Drogtester av elever i skolan är en kontrollåtgärd mot enskilda unga som inte har stöd i det åtagandet. Planen bygger i stället skolans roll på förtroendefulla relationer och förebyggande arbete.
- care instead of punishmentdecisive»Den enskildas missbruk är en sjukdom och vi vill se ett ändrat fokus från straff till vård.« (party programme ↗)“The individual's abuse is an illness and we want to see a changed focus from punishment to care.”
- no to integrity violations»Vi motsätter oss alla lagar som innebär oproportionerliga ingrepp i integriteten.« (party programme ↗)“We oppose all laws that involve disproportionate intrusions on integrity.”
- measures against trafficking»Polisens arbete ska därför fokusera på att motverka försäljning och langning av narkotika.« (party programme ↗)“Police work shall therefore focus on countering the selling and trafficking of drugs.”
- trust in schools»Skolan ska präglas av förtroendefulla relationer och varje elev ska ges inflytande över sin studieväg och skolmiljö.« (party programme ↗)“Schools shall be characterized by trusting relationships and each student shall be given influence over their study path and school environment.”
The plan defends the rule of law and the individual's rights vis-à-vis the state and lists a range of coercive measures that are rejected on integrity grounds.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan defends the rule of law and the individual's rights vis-à-vis the state and lists a range of coercive measures that are rejected on integrity grounds. The party programme makes personal integrity a cornerstone and requires proportionality between integrity restriction and purpose. Drug tests of students on suspicion is a bodily integrity intervention against minors that the plan does not support; its line against youth ill-health is instead a safe school with better student health.
Original (Swedish)
Planen försvarar rättsstaten och individens rättigheter gentemot staten och räknar upp en rad tvångsmedel som avvisas av integritetsskäl. Idéprogrammet gör den personliga integriteten till en grundsten och kräver proportionalitet mellan integritetsinskränkning och syfte. Drogtester av elever på misstanke är ett kroppsligt integritetsingrepp mot minderåriga som planen inte ger stöd för; dess linje mot ungas ohälsa är i stället en trygg skola med bättre elevhälsa.
- no to integrity-infringing coercive measuresdecisive»Rättsstaten och individens rättigheter gentemot staten måste försvaras. Vi säger därför nej till visitationszoner, kollektiv bestraffning, omvänd bevisbörda, anonyma vittnen, preventiv avlyssning och inskränkningar av religionsfriheten.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The rule of law and the individual's rights vis-à-vis the state must be defended. We therefore say no to patrol zones, collective punishment, reversed burden of proof, anonymous witnesses, preventive wiretapping and restrictions on freedom of religion.”
- proportionality requirement»Det måste finnas en proportionalitet mellan lagstiftningens inskränkning av medborgarnas integritet och lagarnas syfte.« (party programme ↗)“There must be proportionality between legislation's restriction of citizens' integrity and the law's purpose.”
- personal integrity»Respekten för den enskildes personliga integritet är en grundsten i varje demokrati.« (party programme ↗)“Respect for the individual's personal integrity is a cornerstone in every democracy.”
- prevention via student health»En bättre elevhälsa är en förutsättning för det.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Better student health is a prerequisite for that.”
The plan's decisive commitment is zero tolerance for narcotics in all handling and that school as a rule should always make police reports and welfare alerts in case of suspected criminality, and earlier and tougher action against young people on the wrong track.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's decisive commitment is zero tolerance for narcotics in all handling and that school as a rule should always make police reports and welfare alerts in case of suspected criminality, and earlier and tougher action against young people on the wrong track. Considering drug testing when there is suspicion of drug influence is in line with that line. The plan's principle that the individual's integrity shall not be violated is a qualifying objection, but the counter-proposal limits itself to cases of suspicion.
Original (Swedish)
Planens avgörande åtagande är nolltolerans mot narkotika i alla led och att skolan som huvudregel alltid ska göra polisanmälan och orosanmälan vid misstänkt brottslighet, samt tidigare och tuffare insatser mot unga på glid. Att överväga drogtester vid misstanke om drogpåverkan ligger i linje med den linjen. Planens princip att den enskildes integritet inte får kränkas är en kvalificerande invändning, men motförslaget begränsar sig till misstankefall.
- zero tolerance for narcoticsdecisive»Nolltolerans ska råda mot narkotika i alla led av hanteringen.« (party programme ↗)“Zero tolerance shall apply to narcotics at all levels of handling.”
- school's duty to report»För att polis och socialtjänst alltid ska få kännedom om barn som är på fel väg i livet ska huvudregeln bli att skolan alltid gör polisanmälan och orosanmälan vid misstänkt brottslighet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“So that police and social services always learn about children on the wrong track in life, the main rule should be that schools always make police reports and welfare alerts in case of suspected criminality.”
- early action against youth on wrong track»Tidigare, tydligare och tuffare insatser för att förebygga och förhindra att unga glider in i brottslighet måste till.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Earlier, clearer and tougher action to prevent and stop young people from sliding into criminality is needed.”
- protection of personal integrity»Den enskildes värdighet och integritet får inte kränkas.« (party programme ↗)“The individual's dignity and integrity shall not be violated.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan has a drug-free society as its goal and wants to counteract youth drug use and increase the detection risk.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan has a drug-free society as its goal and wants to counteract youth drug use and increase the detection risk. The election manifesto goes further and wants to strengthen the social service's possibilities for coercive measures against children and young people. Drug testing on suspicion aligns with the detection- and early intervention line that the plan is built on.
Original (Swedish)
Planen har ett narkotikafritt samhälle som mål och vill motverka ungas droganvändning samt öka upptäcktsrisken. Valmanifestet går längre och vill stärka socialtjänstens möjligheter till tvingande åtgärder mot barn och unga. Drogtester vid misstanke ligger i linje med den upptäckt- och tidiga insatslinjen som planen bygger på.
- coercive measures for youthdecisive»Stärk sociala insatser och socialtjänstens möjligheter till tvingande åtgärder gentemot barn och unga som begår brott.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen social efforts and the social service's possibilities for coercive measures against children and young people who commit crimes.”
- drug-free society»narkotika ska vara förbjudet.« (party programme ↗)“narcotics shall be prohibited.”
- counteract youth drug use»ska göras för att motverka ungas alkoholkonsumtion« (party programme ↗)“shall be done to counteract young people's alcohol consumption”
- increased detection risk»en ökad upptäcktsrisk för förövarna är viktigt« (party programme ↗)“an increased detection risk for perpetrators is important”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wants to carry out the largest crime prevention reform package in modern times, focusing on social services, schools and addiction care, reinstate specialised narcotics police and strengthen teachers' and headmasters' ability to intervene.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to carry out the largest crime prevention reform package in modern times, focusing on social services, schools and addiction care, reinstate specialised narcotics police and strengthen teachers' and headmasters' ability to intervene. Considering drug tests when there is suspicion of affected students is in line with the strategy of breaking young people's drug use early. The plan does not, however, mention drug tests, so the stance is derived.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill genomföra det största brottsförebyggande reformpaketet i modern tid med fokus på socialtjänst, skola och missbruksvård, återinföra specialiserade narkotikapoliser och stärka lärares och rektorers möjlighet att ingripa. Att överväga drogtester vid misstanke om påverkade elever ligger i linje med den linjen att tidigt bryta ungas droganvändning. Planen nämner dock inte drogtester, varför ställningstagandet är härlett.
- crime prevention in schoolsdecisive»Det handlar om över 50 reformer för att stärka socialtjänst, skola och missbruksvård.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It involves over 50 reforms to strengthen social services, schools and addiction care.”
- intensified narcotics control»Återinföra de specialiserade narkotikapoliserna« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Reinstate the specialised narcotics police”
- the school's authority to intervene»Stärka lärares och rektorers auktoritet att kunna ingripa i stökiga situationer« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen teachers' and headmasters' authority to be able to intervene in disruptive situations”
- early interventions for young people»Se till att fler unga lagöverträdare omhändertas enligt lagen om vård av unga« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Ensure that more young offenders are taken into care under the Act on the Care of Young People”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan does not mention drug testing, but it describes drug sales on school playgrounds as an acute problem and wants to give schools, social services and the justice system the opportunity to intervene more forcefully at an early stage.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan does not mention drug testing, but it describes drug sales on school playgrounds as an acute problem and wants to give schools, social services and the justice system the opportunity to intervene more forcefully at an early stage. Zero tolerance in schools and a review of the possibility of forceful measures against students belong to the same line. Derived from this, the plan supports that drug testing be considered when there is suspicion.
Original (Swedish)
Planen nämner inte drogtester, men den beskriver drogförsäljning på skolgårdarna som ett akut problem och vill ge skola, socialtjänst och rättsväsende möjlighet att ingripa med tuffare tag i ett tidigt skede. Nolltolerans i skolan och en översyn av möjligheten till skarpa åtgärder mot elever hör till samma linje. Härlett ur detta stöder planen att drogtester övervägs vid misstanke.
- early and forceful interventionsdecisive»Ge socialtjänst, skola och rättsväsende möjlighet att ingripa med tuffare tag i ett tidigt skede« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Give social services, schools and the justice system the opportunity to intervene more forcefully at an early stage”
- zero tolerance in schools»Nolltolerans ska råda mot hot och våld i skolan och möjligheten att ingripa med skarpa åtgärder mot elever som skapar en dålig arbetsmiljö för andra ska ses över.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Zero tolerance shall apply to threats and violence in schools and the possibility to intervene with forceful measures against students who create a poor working environment for others shall be reviewed.”
- drugs on school playgrounds»Knivattacker och drogförsäljning sker på skolgårdarna.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Knife attacks and drug sales occur on school playgrounds.”
- crackdown on youth crime»Krafttag mot den brottslighet som drabbar unga« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Crackdown on crime affecting young people”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2023/24:UbU12)
- Committee report full text (HB01UbU12)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2023/24:1034 — Återinförande av estetiska ämnen på gymnasiet av Anna Wallentheim (S)
- Motion 2023/24:1040 — Bättre arbetsmiljö av Carina Ödebrink och Azra Muranovic (båda S)
- Motion 2023/24:119 — Totalförsvarskunskap i skolan av Eric Palmqvist (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:1223 — Utbildning för arbete av Martina Johansson (C)
- Motion 2023/24:1461 — Bättre matchning inför framtida yrkesval av Markus Wiechel och Alexander Christiansson (båda SD)
- Motion 2023/24:1462 — En samhällsförberedande skola av Markus Wiechel och Alexander Christiansson (båda SD)
- Motion 2023/24:1570 — Om stärkt trygghet för företagare av Mathias Tegnér och Jennie Nilsson (båda S)
- Motion 2023/24:1800 — Kortare tillståndsprocesser för nya gymnasiekurser av Lili André (KD)
- Motion 2023/24:1804 — Ung Företagsamhet i alla gymnasieutbildningar av Lili André (KD)
- Motion 2023/24:2095 — Drogtester i skolan för att motverka missbruk av Roger Hedlund och Mattias Eriksson Falk (båda SD)
- Motion 2023/24:2117 — Främjat entreprenörskap i grundskolan av Saila Quicklund (M)
- Motion 2023/24:2194 — Underlätta för ungdomar att få jobb och bostad av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2023/24:2302 — Hantverkare för att bidra i en cirkulär ekonomi av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2023/24:2305 — Företagsamhet och entreprenörskap för alla elever av Johanna Rantsi (M)
- Motion 2023/24:2447 — Barns och ungas tillgång till kultur av Amanda Lind m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2023/24:2451 — Utbildning och forskning för ett hållbart samhälle av Camilla Hansén m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2023/24:2454 — Utbildning och forskning - för en stark kunskapsnation av Anders Ådahl m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2023/24:2482 — En skola för livsresor av Muharrem Demirok m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2023/24:2489 — Utbildning för livslångt lärande av Niels Paarup-Petersen m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2023/24:254 — En konkurrenskraftig och säker taxibransch i Sverige av Serkan Köse (S)
Source: The Swedish Parliament