Forest management methods

The election manifesto explicitly states that clear-cutting should be phased out to preserve the forest's carbon sink, that the forest's ability to store emissions should be strengthened and that only residual products should go to biofuel. The counter-proposal's requirements for selective cutting and shelterwood instead of clear-cutting, ceased clear-cutting and avoided forest fertilisation follow directly from this commitment.

• clear-cutting phased outdecisive»För att uppnå klimatmålen behöver skogens funktion som kolsänka bevaras de kommande decennierna, därför behöver kalhyggesbruket fasas ut.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“To achieve climate goals, the forest's function as a carbon sink needs to be preserved in the coming decades, therefore clear-cutting needs to be phased out.”
• strengthened carbon sink and wetlands»Skogens roll att naturligt minska och lagra utsläpp behöver stärkas och torrlagda våtmarker som läcker utsläpp ska återställas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The forest's role in naturally reducing and storing emissions needs to be strengthened and drained wetlands that leak emissions should be restored.”
• wise extraction from the forest»Den skog som avverkas måste användas klokt där endast restprodukter ska användas till biobränsle.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The forest that is harvested must be used wisely where only residual products should be used for biofuel.”
• environmental considerations paramount»de långsiktiga miljöhänsynen måste vara överordnade« (party programme ↗)“long-term environmental considerations must be paramount”

The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.

The counter-proposal wants to replace clear-felling with selective harvesting, leave screening and avoid forest fertilization to reduce nitrogen loading and favour biodiversity. The plan lacks a position on forestry methods, but establishes that environmental considerations are a paramount requirement in all production, that all environmental impact in the form of emissions shall be minimized and that biological diversity shall be protected. Derived from these principles the plan supports the demand, with weak basis.

• environmental considerations paramountdecisive»Den ser miljöhänsyn som« (party programme ↗)“It sees environmental considerations as”
• minimize environmental impact»miljöpåverkan i form av utsläpp och avfallsprodukter ska minimeras.« (party programme ↗)“environmental impact in the form of emissions and waste products shall be minimized.”
• protect biological diversity»biologiska mångfalden måste skyddas.« (party programme ↗)“biological diversity must be protected.”
• species extinction must be slowed»Samtidigt accelererar artdöden och den biologiska mångfalden hotas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“At the same time species extinction is accelerating and biological diversity is threatened.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

The plan explicitly requires that more forestry be conducted using continuous-cover methods and that forestry be modernized with fewer clear-cuts. The counter-proposal's demands for selective logging instead of clear-cuts and for clear-cutting to cease are the same substance. The plan's goal of restoring natural values and reducing nutrient leakage to lakes and seas strengthens the conclusion.

• continuous-cover forestrydecisive»att mer skogsbruk bedrivs med hyggesfria metoder.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“that more forestry be conducted using continuous-cover methods.”
• fewer clear-cuts»Därför måste skogsbruket moderniseras genom mer av hyggesfria avverkningsmetoder och genom mindre kalhyggen« (party programme ↗)“Therefore forestry must be modernized through more continuous-cover harvesting methods and through fewer clear-cuts.”
• management with biodiversity responsibility»Bruk av skog, vatten och mark måste kopplas till ett ansvar för att den biologiska mångfalden inte ska utarmas.« (party programme ↗)“Management of forest, water and land must be linked to responsibility so that biological diversity is not depleted.”
• protection of marine environment»rädda kustens ekosystem — återskapa förstörda miljöer .« (2022 manifesto ↗)“rescue the coast's ecosystem — restore destroyed environments.”

flags: citat_migrerat

The plan presupposes active use of forests and makes voluntariness and ownership the foundation for nature conservation, and the party programme rejects centrally planned directives. The counter-proposal's demand that clear-cutting ceases and that selective cutting and shelterwood are prescribed is precisely such detailed control of the individual forest owner's methodological choice. The plan's concern for lakes and seas does not change that the means is rejected.

• active use of forestsdecisive»Ett hållbart skogsbruk förutsätter ett aktivt brukande av skogen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sustainable forestry presupposes active use of forests.”
• voluntariness before compulsory rules»då frivillighet och äganderätt är grunden för en bättre naturvård« (2022 manifesto ↗)“since voluntariness and ownership are the foundation for better nature conservation”
• cleaner seas and watercourses»Rädda Sveriges sjöar, vattendrag och hav.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Save Sweden's lakes, watercourses and seas.”

flags: citat_blockerat

The plan's decisive commitment is that harvesting methods must be able to vary based on environmental considerations and that forest policy rests on two equal goals, the production goal and the environmental goal. The counter-proposal's demand that clear-cutting shall cease and fertilization be avoided means general method steering that goes beyond this and conflicts with the line to protect Swedish forestry. The plan meets over-fertilization with increased environmental consideration and targeted protection of old-growth forests instead of prohibited management methods.

• varied harvesting methodsdecisive»Miljöhänsynen inom skogsbruket måste öka. Avverkningsmetoder måste kunna variera« (party programme ↗)“Environmental considerations within forestry must increase. Harvesting methods must be able to vary”
• equal forest policy goals»Den svenska skogspolitiken ska vila på två jämställda mål, produktionsmålet och miljömålet.« (party programme ↗)“Swedish forest policy shall rest on two equal goals, the production goal and the environmental goal.”
• protected Swedish forestry»Allemansrätten och det svenska skogsbruket ska värnas« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Everyone's right and Swedish forestry shall be protected”
• targeted protection of old-growth forest»De återstående gammelskogarna ska ges starkare skydd.« (party programme ↗)“The remaining old-growth forests shall be given stronger protection.”

The counter-proposal wants to regulate forestry methods in detail and abolish clear-cutting, whereas the plan builds forest policy on individual ownership and sees private ownership as a guarantee for good stewardship. According to the plan, stewardship entails responsible management, not passive preservation, and environmental consideration should be achieved with the landowner as a resource. The election manifesto also explicitly warns that ownership of the forest is threatened.

• individual ownership in forestsdecisive»för den enskilda äganderätten och generationers erfarenhet av enskilt ägande av skogs- och jordbruksmark« (party programme ↗)“for individual ownership and generations' experience of individual ownership of forest and agricultural land”
• management before preservation»Förvaltarskapsprincipen innebär inget passivt bevarande, utan ett ansvarsfullt brukande och förädlande av tillgångarna« (party programme ↗)“The stewardship principle means not passive preservation, but responsible management and development of assets”
• landowner as conservation resource»både reservatsskydd i olika former och stor naturhänsyn i skogs- och jordbrukslandskapet. Markägarna är« (party programme ↗)“both reserve protection in various forms and great environmental consideration in forest and agricultural landscape. Landowners are”
• threatened ownership of forest»äganderätten över skogen hotas« (2022 manifesto ↗)“ownership of the forest is threatened”

The plan's forest line is that more forest should be managed, not less, that the area exempt from forestry should decrease, and that protection should be built on voluntariness and strengthened property rights. The counter-proposal's demand that clear-cutting ends and methods are directed toward selection cutting and no fertilization is the opposite of this. Eutrophication should according to the plan be met with technological development and Baltic Sea cooperation, not with methods requirements on forest owners.

• ökat skogsbrukdecisive»mer skog ska brukas, inte mindre« (2022 manifesto ↗)“more forest should be managed, not less”
• mindre skog undantas»Minska ytan av skog som är undantagen från skogsbruk« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Reduce the area of forest exempt from forestry”
• frivillighet framför tvång»Stärka skogsägarnas äganderätt genom att formellt skydd av skog ska ske genom frivillighet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen forest owners' property rights by ensuring that formal forest protection occurs through voluntariness”
• teknik mot övergödning»Minska jordbrukets miljöpåverkan genom stöd till teknikutveckling och innovationer« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Reduce agriculture's environmental impact through support for technological development and innovation”

The plan establishes that biological diversity goes hand in hand with active and productive forestry and that voluntary responsibility works best to create environmental values. The counter-proposal instead wants to control method choice in the forest by abolishing clear-cutting and avoiding fertilization. This conflicts with the plan's line on use rights and environmental efficiency over detailed control.

• active forestry provides diversitydecisive»Biologisk mångfald går hand i hand med ett aktivt och produktivt skogsbruk där man genom ny teknik och smarta metoder kan uppnå målen utan kostsam och omfattande utbyggnad av reservaten.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Biological diversity goes hand in hand with active and productive forestry where new technology and smart methods can achieve the goals without costly and extensive expansion of reserves.”
• voluntary responsibility»Erfarenheten visar att frivillighet under ansvar fungerar bäst för att skapa miljövärden, stöttat med kompetent och hjälpande rådgivning.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Experience shows that voluntary responsibility works best to create environmental values, supported by competent and helpful guidance.”
• use rights in the forest»Värna skogsägarnas rätt att bruka sina skogar« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Protect forest owners' right to manage their forests”
• most environmental benefit per krona»Sträva efter miljöeffektivitet och hitta de åtgärder som ger mest miljö per krona« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strive for environmental efficiency and find the measures that deliver the most environmental benefit per krona”

The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.