2026-03-042025/26:SkU17 · p.3SkUTaxation
Exemptions for services within independent groups and rental of real estate
VAT exemption for cost-sharing groups and property rental
What's at stake: The outcome affects how quickly nonprofit associations and property owners get clarity on whether cost-sharing VAT and rental of premises should be treated differently, which shapes the cost of running association activities and the availability of premises.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The vote is about whether parliament should now urge the government to change VAT rules for services within cost-sharing groups and for renting out real estate, or wait for the ongoing court case and inquiry to conclude.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee is waiting for the EU Court of Justice and the Supreme Administrative Court to rule on the VAT exemption for cost-sharing groups, and for the ongoing inquiry into rental of real estate, and therefore rejects the motions.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 9 (C)
A broader review of the VAT system is needed, especially to fix the cost-sharing VAT problem that hits nonprofit associations hard, and to allow a low VAT rate on rent that would strengthen the rental market.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 9 by C.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Abstain 0/0/19/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| S | No | Abstain 1/0/92/13 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| MP | No | Abstain 0/0/15/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| C | No | No 0/21/0/3 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 14/0/0/2 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| KD | No | Yes 16/0/0/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| M | No | Yes 60/0/0/8 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| SD | No | Yes 61/0/0/10 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
Broke with the party line
| SMatilda Ernkrans (S, Örebro län) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2025/26:2820 by Vasiliki Tsouplaki and others (V) claim 3, 2025/26:2835 by Anders Ådahl and others (C) claim 14, 2025/26:3184 by Alireza Akhondi and others (C) claim 3 and 2025/26:3459 by Björn Wiechel and others (S) claim 84.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2025/26:2820 av Vasiliki Tsouplaki m.fl. (V) yrkande 3, 2025/26:2835 av Anders Ådahl m.fl. (C) yrkande 14, 2025/26:3184 av Alireza Akhondi m.fl. (C) yrkande 3 och 2025/26:3459 av Björn Wiechel m.fl. (S) yrkande 84.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected 49 proposals in motions on value-added tax. The motions concern, among other things, changes in value-added tax rates and exemptions from value-added tax. The Riksdag refers, among other things, to work in progress and to the fact that the Riksdag has previously taken a position on these issues.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to introduce a lower VAT rate on menstrual products. (C) — Reservation 9
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan pushes for conditions that secure independence for associational life and popular education, which speaks for that VAT rules should not force non-profit organizations to pay back large amounts.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan pushes for conditions that secure independence for associational life and popular education, which speaks for that VAT rules should not force non-profit organizations to pay back large amounts. Low VAT on residential rent is also in line with the plan's demands for reduced rent and prioritized rental apartments. The plan does not however address the technical design of the VAT system, so the assessment rests on derivation.
Original (Swedish)
Planen driver på för villkor som säkrar självständighet för föreningsliv och folkbildning, vilket talar för att momsregler inte ska tvinga ideella föreningar att betala tillbaka stora belopp. En låg moms på bostadshyra ligger också i linje med planens krav på sänkta hyror och prioriterade hyresrätter. Planen behandlar dock inte momssystemets tekniska utformning, varför bedömningen vilar på härledning.
- strong associational lifedecisive»Vi driver på för villkor som säkrar en stark« (party programme ↗)“We push for conditions that secure a strong”
- value study associations»Därför behöver vi också värna studieförbundens ställning.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Therefore we also need to value study associations' position.”
- reduced rent»Vänsterpartiets nästa steg handlar om en politik för massivt bostadsbyggande, klimatsmarta renoveringar och sänkta hyror som går hand i hand med den gröna omställningen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Left Party's next step is a policy for massive housing construction, climate-smart renovations and reduced rent that goes hand in hand with the green transition.”
- rental apartments with reasonable rent»Vi vill prioritera att bygga hyresrätter med rimliga« (party programme ↗)“We want to prioritize building rental apartments with reasonable”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wants vital popular movements and sees associational life as democratic education, which suggests that VAT rules that force non-profit associations to pay back large amounts should be reviewed.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants vital popular movements and sees associational life as democratic education, which suggests that VAT rules that force non-profit associations to pay back large amounts should be reviewed. An active and social housing policy also underlies the wish for better conditions on the rental market. At the same time the plan binds the party to broad tax bases, which makes support for new VAT exemptions uncertain.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill ha livskraftiga folkrörelser och ser föreningslivet som demokratisk skolning, vilket talar för att momsregler som tvingar ideella föreningar att betala tillbaka stora belopp ses över. En aktiv och social bostadspolitik ligger också bakom önskemålet om bättre villkor på hyresmarknaden. Samtidigt binder planen partiet vid breda skattebaser, vilket gör stödet för nya momsundantag osäkert.
- vital popular movementsdecisive»Livskraftiga folkrörelser för att hålla ihop samhället.« (party programme ↗)“Vital popular movements to hold society together.”
- the associational life's role in democracy»Ett rikt föreningsliv bidrar till demokratisk skolning.« (party programme ↗)“A rich associational life contributes to democratic education.”
- active housing policy»Aktiv och social bostadspolitik.« (party programme ↗)“Active and social housing policy.”
- broad tax bases»Robust, hållbart och rättvist skattesystem med breda skattebaser som ger ökat utrymme« (party programme ↗)“A robust, sustainable and fair tax system with broad tax bases that provide increased scope”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan states that civil society should receive support from the public and that support and conditions must be long-term and clear, which speaks against nonprofits being hit by unforeseen VAT reclaim demands.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that civil society should receive support from the public and that support and conditions must be long-term and clear, which speaks against nonprofits being hit by unforeseen VAT reclaim demands. It also wants state rules to facilitate housing with reasonable rents. A broader review of VAT rules in these two respects therefore aligns with the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att civilsamhället ska få stöd från det offentliga och att stöd och villkor måste vara långsiktiga och tydliga, vilket talar mot att ideella föreningar drabbas av oförutsedda momsåterkrav. Den vill också att statliga regler underlättar bostäder med rimliga hyror. En bredare översyn av momsreglerna i dessa två avseenden ligger därmed i linje med planen.
- predictable conditions for associationsdecisive»Stöd och villkor för civilsamhället måste vara långsiktiga och tydliga.« (party programme ↗)“Support and conditions for civil society must be long-term and clear.”
- public support for civil society»Civilsamhället stöds ekonomiskt genom medlemskap och gåvor, men ska också få stöd från det offentliga.« (party programme ↗)“Civil society is supported economically through membership and donations, but should also receive support from the public.”
- facilitate civil associations»Vi vill att fler människor ska ha möjlighet att lägga tid och engagemang på att organisera sig.« (party programme ↗)“We want more people to have the opportunity to spend time and commitment on organizing themselves.”
- reasonable rents»Statliga stöd ska underlätta byggandet av bostäder med rimliga hyror,« (party programme ↗)“State support should facilitate the construction of housing with reasonable rents,”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan establishes that civil society is a fundamental part of democracy and that policy should tax it as little as possible, while no tax increases that make housing more expensive shall be implemented.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that civil society is a fundamental part of democracy and that policy should tax it as little as possible, while no tax increases that make housing more expensive shall be implemented. To review the internal VAT that forces non-profit associations to refund large amounts, and to test a low VAT rate on rental housing, aligns with both these commitments. The plan does not take a position on the individual VAT exemptions, so the conclusion is derived.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att civilsamhället är en fundamental del av demokratin och att politiken bör beskatta det så lite som möjligt, samtidigt som inga skattehöjningar som gör det dyrare att bo ska genomföras. Att se över internmomsen som tvingar ideella föreningar att betala tillbaka stora belopp, och att pröva en låg momssats på bostadshyra, ligger i linje med båda dessa åtaganden. Planen tar inte ställning till de enskilda momsundantagen, varför slutsatsen härleds.
- low taxation of civil societydecisive»beskatta det så lite som möjligt.« (party programme ↗)“tax it as little as possible.”
- civil society's value»Det civila samhället, människornas frivilliga organisering, är en fundamental del av varje väl fungerande demokrati och välfärdsstat.« (party programme ↗)“Civil society, people's voluntary organization, is a fundamental part of every well-functioning democracy and welfare state.”
- no housing-increasing taxes»Vi kommer inte att medverka till några skattehöjningar som skadar jobben, det egna sparandet eller gör det dyrare att bo.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We shall not participate in any tax increases that harm jobs, personal savings or make housing more expensive.”
- functioning housing market»En förutsättning för utveckling är att det finns tillräckligt med bostäder i hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“A prerequisite for development is that there are sufficient housing in the entire country.”
The plan wants to continue improving civil society's financing and give civil society good conditions, which argues for reviewing VAT rules that force voluntary associations to repay large amounts.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to continue improving civil society's financing and give civil society good conditions, which argues for reviewing VAT rules that force voluntary associations to repay large amounts. It also requires reduced administrative burden. At the same time, the plan wants to shift from lowered taxes to raised consumption taxes, which makes a low VAT rate on housing rental harder to reconcile with the line, and support thus becomes weak.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill fortsätta förbättra civilsamhällets finansiering och ge det civila samhället goda förutsättningar, vilket talar för att se över momsregler som tvingar ideella föreningar att betala tillbaka stora belopp. Den kräver också minskad administrativ börda. Samtidigt vill planen växla sänkta skatter mot höjda konsumtionsskatter, vilket gör en låg momssats på bostadshyra svårare att förena med linjen, och stödet blir därför svagt.
- better conditions for civil societydecisive»Vi vill fortsätta förbättra civilsamhällets finansiering genom både bredare skatteavdrag för gåvor och långsiktiga statsbidrag.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to continue improving civil society's financing through both broader tax deductions for donations and long-term state grants.”
- good conditions for associations»Politiken ska bidra till att det civila samhället ges goda förutsättningar.« (party programme ↗)“Policy shall contribute to giving civil society good conditions.”
- reduced administrative burden»Regelbördan för små företag ska minska, genom ansträngningar på både kommunal, statlig och europeisk nivå, och offentliga beslut analyseras ur småföretagarperspektiv.« (party programme ↗)“Regulatory burden for small enterprises shall decrease, through efforts at both municipal, state and European level, and public decisions are analysed from a small business perspective.”
- raised consumption taxes»Sänkta skatter ska växlas mot höjda konsumtionsskatter och miljöskatter.« (party programme ↗)“Lowered taxes shall be exchanged for raised consumption taxes and environmental taxes.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wants voluntary organisations to be prioritised over commercial interests and that donations to voluntary organisations are tax exempt; that internal VAT forces organisations to return large amounts goes against that line.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants voluntary organisations to be prioritised over commercial interests and that donations to voluntary organisations are tax exempt; that internal VAT forces organisations to return large amounts goes against that line. The plan itself also opens for exceptions from the general VAT level and wants to achieve a functioning housing market. A broader review of VAT on these points is therefore supported by the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill att ideell verksamhet prioriteras framför kommersiella intressen och att gåvor till ideella organisationer är skattebefriade; att internmomsen tvingar föreningar att betala tillbaka stora belopp går emot den linjen. Planen öppnar också själv för undantag från den generella momsnivån och vill få till stånd en fungerande bostadsmarknad. En bredare översyn av momsen på dessa punkter stöds därför av planen.
- voluntary organisations prioritiseddecisive»Ideell verksamhet ska prioriteras framför kommersiella intressen vid utformningen av« (party programme ↗)“Voluntary organisations shall be prioritised over commercial interests in the design of”
- tax relief for non-profit sector»Gåvor till ideella organisationer bör vara« (party programme ↗)“Donations to voluntary organisations should be”
- exceptions possible at high VAT level»Nivån på mervärdesskatten bör i princip vara generell. En hög generell nivå på momssatsen« (party programme ↗)“The level of value-added tax should in principle be general. A high general level of VAT rate”
- functioning housing market»Sverige får till stånd en fungerande bostadsmarknad. I det arbetet ingår att hyresreglering« (party programme ↗)“Sweden achieves a functioning housing market. In that work, housing regulation is”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The counter-proposal wants to look over VAT rules so that non-profit organizations are not hit by internal VAT and so that the rental market gets better conditions.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal wants to look over VAT rules so that non-profit organizations are not hit by internal VAT and so that the rental market gets better conditions. The plan commits to sharply reducing red tape and administration costs and states that more tax is no solution in a country with the world's highest tax burden. It also wants to improve conditions on the rental market, which is close to the counter-proposal's purpose, although the VAT question is not directly addressed.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslaget vill se över momsreglerna så att ideella föreningar inte drabbas av internmomsen och så att hyresmarknaden får bättre villkor. Planen åtar sig att kraftigt minska regelkrånglet och de administrativa kostnaderna och slår fast att mer skatt inte är någon lösning i ett land med världens högsta skattetryck. Den vill dessutom förbättra villkoren på hyresmarknaden, vilket ligger nära motförslagets syfte, även om momsfrågan inte behandlas direkt.
- reduced administrative burdendecisive»Ta bort en tredjedel av företagens administrationskostnader och en tredjedel av regelkrånglet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Remove one third of companies' administration costs and one third of bureaucratic red tape”
- no raised tax collection(2022 manifesto)
- better conditions on rental market»Möjliggöra mer rättvisa hyror genom att potentiella hyresgästers värdering av boendet ges större vikt« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Enable fairer rents by giving potential tenants' valuation of the housing greater weight”
flags: citat_ej_verifierat
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan does not address VAT rules, but wishes to promote civic organizations and slow rising housing costs.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan does not address VAT rules, but wishes to promote civic organizations and slow rising housing costs. A review that frees voluntary organizations from burdensome internal VAT and gives lower VAT on housing rent serves both these commitments. The plan's general requirement for regulatory simplification also supports a broader review of the VAT system.
Original (Swedish)
Planen behandlar inte momsreglerna, men vill främja föreningslivet och bromsa de skenande boendekostnaderna. En översyn som befriar ideella föreningar från betungande internmoms och ger lägre moms på bostadshyra tjänar båda dessa åtaganden. Planens allmänna krav på regelförenkling stödjer också en bredare översyn av momssystemet.
- promote civic organizationsdecisive»Samhället bör i större utsträckning tillgodose behovet av idrottsanläggningar, främja föreningslivet och underlätta elitklubbar att bedriva verksamhet på en nivå som mäter sig i internationell konkurrens.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Society should to a greater extent meet the need for sports facilities, promote civic organizations and facilitate elite clubs to conduct operations at a level that compares in international competition.”
- lower housing costs»Åtgärder behöver också vidtas för att bromsa de skenande boendekostnaderna så att fler har råd till ett hem.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Measures also need to be taken to slow rising housing costs so more people can afford a home.”
- reduced administrative burden»Verka för regelförenkling och avlasta småföretagens administrativa börda« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Work for regulatory simplification and reduce small businesses' administrative burden”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:SkU17)
- Committee report full text (HD01SkU17)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:1087 — Åtgärder för rättvis dold mervärdesskatt av Anna Wallentheim (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1128 — Dansbandsmomsen av Anna Lasses m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2025/26:1517 — Rättvis moms för stiftelser och aktiebolag av Peter Ollén (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1687 — Dubbelbeskattning av Margareta Cederfelt (M)
- Motion 2025/26:184 — Sänkt moms på privat musikundervisning av Victoria Tiblom (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:1977 — Översyn av leasingregler för lätta lastbilar av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1978 — Sänkt moms på secondhand av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2013 — Sänkt matmoms för alla som säljer mat av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2016 — Lägre moms för secondhandvaror av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2036 — Sänkt eller avskaffad moms på körkort av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2040 — Sänkt moms på körkort av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2140 — Sänkt moms för ökad turism av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2344 — Sänkt moms för fritidsbåtar i gästhamn av Johanna Rantsi (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2426 — Sänkt moms på preventivmedel och digitala preventivmedelstjänster av Saila Quicklund och Merit Frost Lindberg (båda M)
- Motion 2025/26:2461 — Sänkt dansbandsmoms av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2531 — Sänkt moms för bio och nöjesfält av Mattias Eriksson Falk m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:2551 — Halverad moms på skolmaterial inför skolstart av Mattias Eriksson Falk och Roger Hedlund (båda SD)
- Motion 2025/26:2820 — Idrott, friluftsliv och folkhälsa av Vasiliki Tsouplaki m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:2823 — Cirkulär ekonomi och kemikalier av Stina Larsson m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2025/26:2834 — Ett jämställt samhälle av Helena Vilhelmsson m.fl. (C)
Source: The Swedish Parliament