2023-03-082022/23:UbU4 · p.1UbUEducation

General prerequisites

Requirements on staff competence and the Swedish language in preschool

What's at stake: The outcome affects how preschool staff's competence and language skills are secured, which matters for children's language development and for employees who lack adequate training or Swedish-language skills.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is whether parliament should impose new Swedish-language requirements on preschool staff and set up a dedicated competence initiative, or whether current regulation in the Education Act and ongoing efforts are considered sufficient.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee rejects the motions. The Education Act already regulates which staff may provide instruction and places requirements on the principal organiser's and head's responsibility for competence development. The committee shares the view that skilled preschool teachers are the most important factor for quality, but points to measures already implemented for the Swedish language and sees no need for new legal requirements.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 1 (S)

The Social Democrats consider that every child should be met with high expectations of learning proper Swedish, and therefore want to introduce a Swedish-language requirement for pedagogical staff in preschool. Staff needing competence development in Swedish should receive it, and a preschool boost similar to the eldercare boost should be introduced so employees lacking adequate training or language skills can take childcare-assistant training or Swedish-for-immigrants classes during working hours.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by S.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
VYesYes 19/1/0/4follows the planconfidence: lowderived
Sown reservationNoNo 0/90/0/17follows the planconfidence: highexplicit
MPYesYes 15/0/0/3follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
CNoYes 20/1/0/3departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
LNoYes 14/0/0/2departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived
KDNoYes 16/0/0/3departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived
MNoYes 57/0/0/11departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived
SDNoAbstain 0/0/64/9departs from the planconfidence: highexplicit

Broke with the party line

VMalcolm Momodou Jallow (V, Malmö kommun)No — party line: Yes
CAnders Karlsson (C, Jönköpings län)No — party line: Yes

MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.

Committee proposal

Parliament rejects the motions 2022/23:1023 by Patrick Reslow et al. (SD) demands 1, 2, 14 and 18, 2022/23:1719 by Johan Andersson et al. (S) and 2022/23:2128 by Åsa Westlund et al. (S) demand 38.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2022/23:1023 av Patrick Reslow m.fl. (SD) yrkandena 1, 2, 14 och 18, 2022/23:1719 av Johan Andersson m.fl. (S) och 2022/23:2128 av Åsa Westlund m.fl. (S) yrkande 38.

Riksdag decision: Parliament rejected about thirty proposals in motions from the general motion period 2022 on preschool. This with reference to existing regulations, measures taken and ongoing work. The motions deal, among other things, with quality and conditions in preschool, about participation in preschool and other educational activities.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan's answer to quality shortcomings in preschool and school is resources, more teachers and confidence in the employed, not new demands directed at staff.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan's answer to quality shortcomings in preschool and school is resources, more teachers and confidence in the employed, not new demands directed at staff. It also establishes that no one should have to experience racism in the workplace and that discrimination in the labour market must be stopped, which speaks against a special language requirement that risks sorting out employees with foreign backgrounds. Skills development during working time has support in the plan, but the requirement itself lacks it.

Original (Swedish)

Planens svar på kvalitetsbrister i förskola och skola är resurser, fler lärare och tillit till de anställda, inte nya krav riktade mot personalen. Den slår också fast att ingen ska behöva utstå rasism på arbetsplatsen och att diskrimineringen på arbetsmarknaden måste stoppas, vilket talar mot ett särskilt språkkrav som riskerar att sortera bort anställda med utländsk bakgrund. Kompetensutveckling på arbetstid har stöd i planen, men själva kravet saknar det.

  • no screening-out demands on staffdecisive»Ingen av oss ska behöva utstå rasism på arbetsplatsen eller vara beroende av arbetsgivaren för att få stanna i Sverige« (2022 manifesto ↗)“None of us should have to experience racism in the workplace or be dependent on the employer to stay in Sweden.”
  • stop workplace discrimination»Diskrimineringen och rasismen på arbetsmarknaden måste stoppas« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Discrimination and racism in the labour market must be stopped.”
  • resources before control»Det är resurser som främst behövs, inte formulär för kvalitetssäkring, nya bokningssystem för sjukhussängar eller ännu en managementkonsult som inte kan något om verksamheten« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is resources that are needed above all, not forms for quality assurance, new booking systems for hospital beds or yet another management consultant who knows nothing about the operation.”
  • more teachers and early intervention»Vänsterpartiet vill se fler lärare, tidigare insatser för barn som har det kämpigt och förbättrad tillgång till lärande genom hela livet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Left Party wants to see more teachers, earlier interventions for children who are struggling and improved access to learning throughout life.”

flags: svagt planstöd

SSocialdemokraternaNoNofollows the planexplicit

The plan explicitly wants to introduce language requirements for pre-school staff, with the opportunity for language training for those who do not have sufficient skills, and a language boost for childcare.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan explicitly wants to introduce language requirements for pre-school staff, with the opportunity for language training for those who do not have sufficient skills, and a language boost for childcare. It also wants staff to be able to receive training during working hours. The counter-proposal's demand for language requirements plus targeted skills development is thus the plan's own formulation.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill uttryckligen införa språkkrav för anställda inom förskolan, med möjlighet till språkutbildning för den som inte har tillräckliga kunskaper, och ett språklyft för barnomsorgen. Den vill också att anställda ska kunna utbilda sig på arbetstid. Motförslagets krav på språkkrav plus riktad kompetenssatsning är därmed planens egen formulering.

  • language requirements in pre-schooldecisive»Vi vill införa språkkrav för anställda inom förskola och äldreomsorg, med möjlighet till språkutbildning för den som inte har tillräckliga kunskaper.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to introduce language requirements for pre-school and elderly care staff, with the opportunity for language training for those who do not have sufficient skills.”
  • language boost for childcare»Vi vill se ett språklyft för barnomsorgen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to see a language boost for childcare”
  • good Swedish in welfare»Genom språkkrav och utbildningsinsatser vill vi säkerställa att alla som jobbar i välfärden talar god svenska.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Through language requirements and educational initiatives we want to ensure that everyone working in welfare speaks good Swedish.”
  • training during working hours»Vi vill fortsätta satsningen på att anställda inom äldreomsorgen ska kunna utbildas på arbetstid.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to continue the effort to ensure that elderly care staff can receive training during working hours.”
MPMiljöpartietYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan sees other native languages than Swedish as an asset and wants to counteract people being discriminated against for their name or their accent; a specific language requirement for preschool staff goes in the opposite direction.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan sees other native languages than Swedish as an asset and wants to counteract people being discriminated against for their name or their accent; a specific language requirement for preschool staff goes in the opposite direction. The plan's path to quality is instead good access to well-trained educators and high-quality Swedish instruction for everyone who needs it. The demand part in the counter-proposal is therefore rejected, even though competence development in itself aligns with the plan.

Original (Swedish)

Planen ser andra modersmål än svenska som en tillgång och vill motverka att människor diskrimineras för sitt namn eller sin brytning; ett särskilt språkkrav för förskolans personal går i motsatt riktning. Planens väg till kvalitet är i stället god tillgång till väl utbildade pedagoger och högkvalitativ svenskundervisning för alla som behöver den. Kravdelen i motförslaget avvisas därför, även om kompetensutveckling i sig ligger i planens linje.

  • native language as resourcedecisive»Andra modersmål än svenska ska ses som fördelar« (party programme ↗)“Other native languages than Swedish should be seen as advantages”
  • counteract accent discrimination»sitt namn eller sin brytning. Det vill vi motverka« (party programme ↗)“their name or their accent. That is what we want to counteract”
  • trained preschool educators»god tillgång till väl utbildade pedagoger i förskolan« (party programme ↗)“good access to well-trained educators in preschool”
  • Swedish instruction for all»Alla som behöver ska erbjudas en högkvalitativ« (party programme ↗)“Everyone who needs it should be offered high-quality”

flags: planen stöder kompetensutveckling men inte språkkrav

CCenterpartietNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan places early language learning and strict quality requirements in preschool at the centre and requires equivalent preschool throughout the country, which supports the requirement that staff master Swedish.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan places early language learning and strict quality requirements in preschool at the centre and requires equivalent preschool throughout the country, which supports the requirement that staff master Swedish. The counter-proposal's skills initiative, where employees can study further during working hours, corresponds to the plan's line that Swedish can be learned on the job. The plan mentions no explicit language requirement, so the position is derived from these commitments.

Original (Swedish)

Planen sätter tidig språkinlärning och strikta kvalitetskrav i förskolan i centrum och kräver en likvärdig förskola i hela landet, vilket bär kravet att personalen behärskar svenska. Motförslagets kompetenssatsning, där anställda får läsa vidare på arbetstid, motsvarar planens linje att svenska ska kunna läras på jobbet. Planen nämner inget uttalat språkkrav, så ställningstagandet härleds ur dessa åtaganden.

  • early language learningdecisive»Det är viktigt att utgå från varje barns behov, inte minst för den tidiga språkinlärningen.« (party programme ↗)“It is important to start from each child's needs, not least for early language learning.”
  • strict quality requirements»Styrningen av skolan ska kännetecknas av strikta kvalitetskrav och likvärdighet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Governance of the school shall be characterized by strict quality requirements and equivalence.”
  • Swedish on the job»Det kräver intensiva språkstudier, praktik, en effektiv matchning och jobb — inklusive möjligheten att lära sig svenska på jobbet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It requires intensive language studies, practice, efficient matching and work — including the opportunity to learn Swedish on the job.”
  • equivalent preschool»Därför ska vi ha en likvärdig förskola och skola i hela landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Therefore we shall have equivalent preschool and school throughout the country.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

LLiberalernaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan wants to expand preschool and invest in the Swedish language, and it explicitly requires that staff in publicly financed care have sufficient Swedish language skills.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants to expand preschool and invest in the Swedish language, and it explicitly requires that staff in publicly financed care have sufficient Swedish language skills. Swedish shall be the society-bearing language and preschool shall stimulate language development in children of foreign-born parents. A language requirement with targeted competence development for preschool staff thus follows from the plan.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill bygga ut förskolan och satsa på det svenska språket, och den ställer uttryckligen krav på att personal i offentligt finansierad omsorg ska ha tillräckliga kunskaper i svenska. Svenska ska vara det samhällsbärande språket och förskolan ska stimulera språkutvecklingen hos barn till utrikesfödda. Ett språkkrav med riktad kompetensutveckling för förskolans personal följer därför av planen.

  • language requirement for staffdecisive»All personal ska ha tillräckliga kunskaper i det svenska språket.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“All staff shall have sufficient knowledge of the Swedish language.”
  • Swedish in preschool»Vi vill bygga ut förskolan och satsa på det svenska språket.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to expand preschool and invest in the Swedish language.”
  • preschool as language environment»Barn till utrikesfödda stimuleras i sin språkutveckling« (party programme ↗)“Children of foreign-born parents are stimulated in their language development”
  • Swedish as society-bearing language»Svenska är och ska vara det samhällsbärande språket.« (party programme ↗)“Swedish is and shall be the society-bearing language.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

KDKristdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The party programme requires that preschools have staff with both pedagogical and care competence and highlights stewardship of the Swedish language, while at the same time knowledge of Swedish is pointed out as a key to integration.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The party programme requires that preschools have staff with both pedagogical and care competence and highlights stewardship of the Swedish language, while at the same time knowledge of Swedish is pointed out as a key to integration. The election manifesto wants to ensure continuous professional development for care staff. A language requirement with targeted professional development for preschool staff thus follows from the plan.

Original (Swedish)

Partiprogrammet kräver att förskolan har personal med både pedagogisk och omvårdande kompetens och lyfter förvaltarskapet om det svenska språket, samtidigt som kunskap i svenska pekas ut som en nyckel till integration. Valmanifestet vill säkerställa kontinuerlig kompetensutveckling för omsorgspersonal. Ett språkkrav med riktad kompetensutveckling för förskolans personal följer därför av planen.

  • staff with right competencedecisive»Förskoleverksamheten, som har en viktig pedagogisk uppgift, ska präglas av valfrihet, jämn och hög kvalitet i form av små barngrupper och personal med både pedagogisk och omvårdande kompetens.« (party programme ↗)“Preschool activities, which have an important pedagogical task, shall be characterised by choice, fair and high quality in the form of small child groups and staff with both pedagogical and care competence.”
  • Swedish language status»det svenska språket, vars ställning som majoritetsspråk bör vara grundlagsskyddat.« (party programme ↗)“the Swedish language, whose position as majority language should be constitutionally protected.”
  • Swedish as a key to integration»Jobb, kunskap i svenska språket och det civila samhället är viktiga nycklar till integration.« (party programme ↗)“Employment, knowledge of the Swedish language and civil society are important keys to integration.”
  • continuous professional development»Säkerställ att personal inom hemtjänst och äldreboenden har möjlighet till kontinuerlig kompetensutveckling.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Ensure that staff within home care and residential care have the opportunity for continuous professional development.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MModeraternaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan makes Swedish language at an early age a main issue and states that many children start school without being able to speak Swedish.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan makes Swedish language at an early age a main issue and states that many children start school without being able to speak Swedish. It introduces language requirements for care and elderly care personnel and mandatory language preschool, which shows that the plan accepts language requirements for staff as a tool. A specific language requirement for preschool staff, with competence development for those who need it, therefore aligns with the plan's direction.

Original (Swedish)

Planen gör svenska språket i tidig ålder till en huvudfråga och konstaterar att många barn börjar skolan utan att kunna svenska. Den inför språkkrav för personal inom vård och äldreomsorg och obligatorisk språkförskola, vilket visar att planen accepterar språkkrav på personal som verktyg. Ett särskilt språkkrav för förskolans personal, med kompetensutveckling för dem som behöver, ligger därmed i planens linje.

  • language requirements for staffdecisive»Införa språkkrav för personal inom vård och äldreomsorg« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Introduce language requirements for care and elderly care personnel”
  • early language shortcomings»I dag börjar många barn som är födda i Sverige skolan utan att kunna tala eller förstå svenska, och får därför mycket sämre förutsättningar att klara sin skolgång.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Today many children born in Sweden start school without being able to speak or understand Swedish, and therefore have much worse conditions to cope with their schooling.”
  • language preschool»Införa obligatorisk språkförskola för barn som visar en bristande språkutveckling« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Introduce mandatory language preschool for children showing inadequate language development”
  • Swedish early»Där alla barn får lära sig bra svenska tidigt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Where all children get to learn good Swedish early.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

SDSverigedemokraternaNoAbstaindeparts from the planexplicit

The plan prioritizes the Swedish language in childcare, states that activities shall be conducted in Swedish and points out shortcomings in Swedish language as one of childcare's problems.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan prioritizes the Swedish language in childcare, states that activities shall be conducted in Swedish and points out shortcomings in Swedish language as one of childcare's problems. The plan also introduces language requirements for staff in elderly care, which shows that language requirements for staff are an accepted tool. The counter-proposal's language requirements and targeted competence investment therefore align with the plan's line, and the plan speaks directly against the committee's reasoning that already implemented language measures are sufficient.

Original (Swedish)

Planen prioriterar det svenska språket inom barnomsorgen, slår fast att verksamheten ska bedrivas på svenska och pekar ut brister i svenska språket som ett av barnomsorgens problem. Planen inför också språkkrav för personal i äldreomsorgen, vilket visar att språkkrav på personal är ett accepterat verktyg. Motförslagets språkkrav och riktade kompetenssatsning motsvarar därmed planens linje, och planen talar direkt mot utskottets skäl att redan genomförda språkinsatser räcker.

  • Swedish language in childcaredecisive»Prioritera svenska språket inom barnomsorgen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Prioritize the Swedish language in childcare”
  • activities in Swedish»Alla barn ska också ges möjlighet att bli en del av det svenska samhället och verksamheten ska därför bedrivas på svenska språket.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“All children should also be given the opportunity to become part of Swedish society and activities should therefore be conducted in the Swedish language.”
  • shortcomings in Swedish with staff»Svensk barnomsorg dras med kraftiga problem såsom för stora barngrupper, utbränd personal, brister i svenska språket och allt mer åtstramade ekonomiska möjligheter.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Swedish childcare faces serious problems such as overly large child groups, burned-out staff, shortcomings in Swedish language and increasingly strained financial opportunities.”
  • language requirements for staff»Införa språkkrav för personal inom hemtjänsten och äldreomsorgen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Introduce language requirements for staff in home help services and elderly care.”

The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament