2026-06-152025/26:NU24 · p.2NUBusiness & energy
Areas for nuclear power and offshore wind power
A call for the government to designate areas for both nuclear power and offshore wind power
What's at stake: The decision concerns the state's role in designating where new nuclear power and offshore wind power can be built, which affects the pace and direction of the expansion of both forms of power, and thus future electricity supply.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether parliament should call on the government to bring forward legislation designating suitable areas for both new nuclear power and offshore wind power, or whether no such combined instruction is needed.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee recommends rejecting the motion calling for the government to bring forward legislation designating suitable areas for both nuclear power and offshore wind power. Regardless of one's view of the government's nuclear power proposal more broadly, the committee does not consider that parliament should direct such an instruction to the government.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 3 (V)
V does not think the state should designate new areas for nuclear power, arguing instead that any new nuclear development should be assessed within the framework of the existing energy-policy agreement and on already existing sites. The party sees considerable potential in offshore wind power, however, and holds that the state needs to take overall responsibility for designating new areas so that the expansion of renewable energy can be accelerated. V therefore wants the government to bring forward legislation enabling a coordinated designation of suitable areas for offshore wind power.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 3 by V.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have held
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: MPMiljöpartiet
Ja 216–24Ja 198–42
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | No 0/21/0/0 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
| S | No | Abstain 0/0/105/1 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| MP | No | Yes 18/0/0/0 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| C | No | Yes 24/0/0/0 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| L | Yes | Yes 16/0/0/0 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
| KD | Yes | Yes 19/0/0/0 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| M | Yes | Yes 66/0/0/0 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
| SD | Yes | Yes 70/0/0/0 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
Committee proposal
Parliament rejects the motion 2025/26:3971 by Fredrik Olovsson et al. (S) demand 2.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motion 2025/26:3971 av Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S) yrkande 2.
Riksdag decision: The government wants to create better conditions for new establishments of nuclear facilities and presents proposals for amendments to the Environmental Code. Parliament voted yes on the government's proposal. The legislative amendments aim to make it possible to expand nuclear power at more locations on the coast, while maintaining the protection of nature and cultural values. The proposal means that the prohibition against nuclear facilities within coastal areas and archipelagos in Bohuslän, from the border with Norway to Brofjorden, in Småland and Östergötland, from Simpevarp to Arkö Sound, as well as in Ångermanland, from Storfjärden at the mouth of the Ångerman River to Skagsudde, and on Öland is removed. the prohibition against nuclear facilities within coastal areas and archipelagos from Brofjorden to Simpevarp and from Arkösund to Forsmark, along the coast of Gotland, at Östergarn and Storsudret on Gotland as well as on Fårö, at other places than where certain industrial and similar facilities already exist, is removed. The legislative amendments enter into force on 15 July 2026.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants the state not to designate new areas for nuclear power but to designate new areas for offshore wind power. (V) — Reservation 3
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan explicitly rejects nuclear power expansion and establishes that radical expansion of renewable electricity production is decisive.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly rejects nuclear power expansion and establishes that radical expansion of renewable electricity production is decisive. The counter-proposal wants the state to refrain from designating new nuclear power areas but takes a joint responsibility for designating areas for offshore wind power. The plan also wants the state to increase its control over the infrastructure that the climate transition requires and invest in renewable energy.
Original (Swedish)
Planen avvisar uttryckligen kärnkraftsutbyggnaden och slår fast att en radikal utbyggnad av den förnybara elproduktionen är avgörande. Motförslaget vill just att staten avstår från att peka ut nya kärnkraftsområden men tar ett samlat ansvar för att peka ut områden för havsbaserad vindkraft. Planen vill dessutom att staten ökar sin kontroll över den infrastruktur som klimatomställningen kräver och går in med satsningar på förnybar energi.
- rejects nuclear power expansiondecisive»planerna på att bygga ut kärnkraften som en väg ut ur fossilberoendet.« (party programme ↗)“plans to expand nuclear power as a way out of fossil fuel dependence.”
- radical renewable expansion»En radikal utbyggnad av den förnybara elproduktionen är avgörande« (party programme ↗)“A radical expansion of renewable electricity production is decisive”
- public investment in renewable energy»därför behöver staten gå in med satsningar på förnybar energi« (2022 manifesto ↗)“therefore the state needs to invest in renewable energy”
- state control over energy infrastructure»Staten måste öka sin kontroll över infrastruktur och resurser som behövs för att genomföra klimatomställningen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The state must increase its control over infrastructure and resources needed to implement the climate transition.”
The plan highlights that offshore wind power can contribute considerable energy and wants to break bureaucratic barriers for more electricity.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan highlights that offshore wind power can contribute considerable energy and wants to break bureaucratic barriers for more electricity. That the state takes overall responsibility for pointing out new areas for offshore-based wind power follows directly from that commitment. That any new nuclear power is kept within the existing energy agreement aligns with the plan's requirement for a broad energy agreement.
Original (Swedish)
Planen lyfter särskilt att vindkraft långt ute till havs kan bidra med mycket energi och vill riva de byråkratiska hindren för mer el. Att staten tar ett samlat ansvar för att peka ut nya områden för havsbaserad vindkraft följer direkt av det åtagandet. Att eventuell ny kärnkraft hålls inom den befintliga energiöverenskommelsen ligger i linje med planens krav på en bred energiuppgörelse.
- offshore wind powerdecisive»Bygg ut elproduktionen av alla slag. Vindkraft långt ute till havs kan bidra med mycket energi.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Expand electricity production of all kinds. Offshore wind power can contribute considerable energy.”
- cross-party energy agreement»Efter valet vill vi se en ny energiöverenskommelse för Sveriges bästa, och vill därför föra energipolitiska samtal med andra partier om allt från vindkraft till kärnkraft.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“After the election we want to see a new energy agreement for Sweden's benefit, and therefore want to conduct energy policy discussions with other parties about everything from wind power to nuclear power.”
- renewable electricity production»Stabil, tillförlitlig och fossilfri elproduktion som på lång sikt är förnybar.« (party programme ↗)“Stable, reliable and fossil-free electricity production that in the long term is renewable.”
- faster authorization processes»Riv de byråkratiska hindren för mer el. Långsamma tillståndsprocesser ska snabbas på.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Break the bureaucratic barriers for more electricity. Slow authorization processes shall be speeded up.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The counter-proposal wants the state to designate new areas for offshore wind power but not for nuclear power.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal wants the state to designate new areas for offshore wind power but not for nuclear power. The plan promises to expand offshore wind power rapidly throughout the country and opposes new nuclear power in Swedish energy supply, arguing that solar and wind are cheapest and fastest. The counter-proposal's demands thus coincide point for point with the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslaget vill att staten pekar ut nya områden för havsbaserad vindkraft men inte för kärnkraft. Planen lovar att bygga ut havsvindkraften snabbt i hela landet och motsätter sig ny kärnkraft i svensk energiförsörjning, med argumentet att sol och vind är billigast och snabbast. Motförslagets krav sammanfaller därmed punkt för punkt med planen.
- rapid expansion of offshore wind powerdecisive»bygga ut vindkraften till havs snabbt i hela landet, med hänsyn till livet i havet. Ge rejäl ekonomisk återbäring till de kommuner där det byggs och finns vindkraft.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“expand offshore wind power rapidly throughout the country, with regard to marine life. Provide fair economic return to the municipalities where wind power is built and located.”
- no to new nuclear power»Miljöpartiet motsätter sig ny kärnkraft i svensk« (party programme ↗)“The Green Party opposes new nuclear power in Swedish”
- renewable cheapest and fastest»Solenergi och vindkraft är idag de överlägset billigaste, snabbaste och säkraste sätten att bygga ut vår energiproduktion.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Solar energy and wind power are today by far the cheapest, fastest and safest ways to expand our energy production.”
- rapid expansion of renewable energy»Därutöver vill vi i Miljöpartiet se en snabb utbyggnad av förnybar energi som vindkraft« (party programme ↗)“Moreover, we in the Green Party want to see rapid expansion of renewable energy such as wind power”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The party programme's vision is a society with one hundred percent renewable energy without nuclear power, and the election manifesto's energy promise is to double the production of emissions-free electricity and make Sweden Europe's green battery.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme's vision is a society with one hundred percent renewable energy without nuclear power, and the election manifesto's energy promise is to double the production of emissions-free electricity and make Sweden Europe's green battery. That the state points out new areas for offshore wind power but not for nuclear power follows from that. The plan also prioritises broad, long-term agreements, which supports that new construction is kept within an existing energy agreement.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammets vision är ett samhälle med hundra procent förnybar energi utan kärnkraft, och valmanifestets energilöfte är att fördubbla produktionen av utsläppsfri el och göra Sverige till Europas gröna batteri. Att staten pekar ut nya områden för havsbaserad vindkraft men inte för kärnkraft följer av det. Planen prioriterar dessutom breda, långsiktiga överenskommelser, vilket stöder att nybyggnation hålls inom en befintlig energiöverenskommelse.
- society without nuclear powerdecisive»där Centerpartiets vision är ett samhälle utan kärnkraft« (party programme ↗)“where the Centre Party's vision is a society without nuclear power”
- doubled emissions-free electricity»Vi vill fördubbla produktionen av utsläppsfri el, och rusta och bygga ut elnätet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to double the production of emissions-free electricity, and upgrade and expand the electricity grid.”
- expanded renewable electricity production»Sverige ska bli Europas gröna batteri och exportera el till grannländer som fasar ut sitt fossilberoende.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden shall become Europe's green battery and export electricity to neighbouring countries phasing out their fossil dependence.”
- broad energy agreements»Vi prioriterar långsiktiga, gemensamma lösningar med partier från både vänster och höger.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We prioritise long-term, joint solutions with parties from both left and right.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The counter-proposal wants to prevent the state from designating new nuclear power areas and keep new construction to already established sites.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal wants to prevent the state from designating new nuclear power areas and keep new construction to already established sites. The plan requires the exact opposite: the state shall designate sites so that nuclear power actors can quickly begin construction, and more new reactors shall be enabled at more sites. The fact that the plan simultaneously sees offshore wind power as important only means that it wants both, not one instead of the other.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslaget vill hindra staten från att peka ut nya kärnkraftsområden och hålla nybyggnation till redan etablerade platser. Planen kräver raka motsatsen: staten ska peka ut platser så att kärnkraftsaktörer snabbt kan påbörja byggnation, och fler nya reaktorer ska möjliggöras på fler ställen. Att planen samtidigt ser havsbaserad vindkraft som viktig gör bara att den vill se båda delarna, inte den ena i stället för den andra.
- state designates nuclear power sitesdecisive»Staten ska underlätta en utbyggnad av svensk kärnkraft, bland annat genom att peka ut platser så att kärnkraftsaktörer snabbt kan påbörja byggnation.« (party programme ↗)“The state shall facilitate an expansion of Swedish nuclear power, among other things by designating sites so that nuclear power actors can quickly begin construction.”
- more reactors at more sites»I stället vill vi möjliggöra fler nya reaktorer på fler ställen, möjliggöra återstart av Ringhals 1 och 2, se till att statliga lånegarantier omfattar kärnkraften, modernisera regelverken och ge kärnkraften betalt för att den alltid finns tillgänglig.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Instead, we want to enable more new reactors at more sites, enable restart of Ringhals 1 and 2, ensure that state loan guarantees cover nuclear power, modernize the regulations and pay nuclear power for always being available.”
- offshore wind power»Havsbaserad vindkraft är en viktig del av en robust elförsörjning.« (party programme ↗)“Offshore wind power is an important part of a robust electricity supply.”
- both nuclear power and wind power»Ska vi få ner elpriserna krävs att vi bygger inte bara kärnkraft utan också mer sol- och vindkraft i hela landet, investerar i kraftsystemet och satsar på energilagring.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“To bring down electricity prices, we need to build not only nuclear power but also more solar and wind power throughout the country, invest in the power system and invest in energy storage.”
The counter-proposal wants to prevent the state from designating new areas for nuclear power and instead prioritize offshore wind power.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal wants to prevent the state from designating new areas for nuclear power and instead prioritize offshore wind power. The election manifesto, on the other hand, requires expansion with new reactors and lays down that wind power can only be a complement. The programme wants to preserve baseload power and that intermittent power is connected in balanced proportion to it, which speaks against one-sided investment in offshore wind.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslaget vill hindra att staten pekar ut nya områden för kärnkraft och i stället prioritera havsbaserad vindkraft. Valmanifestet kräver tvärtom utbyggnad med nya reaktorer och slår fast att vindkraft bara kan vara ett komplement. Programmet vill värna baskraften och att intermittent kraft ansluts i balanserad proportion till den, vilket talar mot en ensidig satsning på havsvind.
- expanded nuclear powerdecisive»Satsa på kärnkraften med långsiktiga villkor att utvecklas. Förläng befintliga reaktorers drift och bygg ut med nya reaktorer.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Invest in nuclear power with long-term conditions to develop. Extend the operation of existing reactors and expand with new reactors.”
- wind power only as complement»Bygg ut vindkraften men med respekt för den lokala demokratin och anpassa storleken efter lokala villkor. Vindkraft kan dock bara vara ett komplement.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Expand wind power but with respect for local democracy and adjust the size according to local conditions. Wind power can, however, only be a complement.”
- baseload power must be preserved»baskraften som framförallt utgörs av kärnkraft, vattenkraft och kraftvärme. Denna baskraft« (party programme ↗)“baseload power which is above all made up of nuclear power, hydropower and combined heat and power. This baseload power”
- balanced share of intermittent power»intermittenta, förnybara kraftslag göras i balanserad proportion till den existerande« (party programme ↗)“intermittent, renewable energy sources are made in balanced proportion to the existing”
The plan explicitly promises to abolish the ban on building reactors in places other than at existing nuclear plants and that many new, smaller reactors are needed.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly promises to abolish the ban on building reactors in places other than at existing nuclear plants and that many new, smaller reactors are needed. The counter-proposal in contrast wants to keep new construction within the existing energy agreement and already established locations, and instead point out areas for offshore wind. This conflicts with the plan's commitments and is rejected.
Original (Swedish)
Planen lovar uttryckligen att avskaffa förbudet mot att bygga reaktorer på andra platser än vid de befintliga kärnkraftverken och att många nya, mindre reaktorer behövs. Motförslaget vill tvärtom hålla nybyggnation inom den befintliga energiöverenskommelsen och redan etablerade platser, och i stället peka ut områden för havsvind. Det står i strid med planens åtaganden och avvisas.
- more permitted locations for nuclear powerdecisive»Avskaffa förbudet mot att bygga reaktorer på andra platser än vid de befintliga kärnkraftverken« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Abolish the ban on building reactors in places other than at existing nuclear plants”
- many small reactors»Inte minst finns ett behov av att bygga många nya, mindre reaktorer snarare än ett fåtal stora« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Not least is there a need to build many new, smaller reactors rather than a few large ones”
- fossil-free energy goal»Ändra det energipolitiska målet från 100 procent förnybart till 100 procent fossilfritt« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Change the energy policy goal from 100 per cent renewable to 100 per cent fossil-free”
- nuclear power is central»I det läge Sverige har hamnat i på grund av dåliga politiska beslut kommer en utbyggnad av kärnkraften att vara helt central.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“In the situation Sweden has found itself in due to poor political decisions, an expansion of nuclear power will be entirely central.”
The plan actively seeks to create conditions for new nuclear power, including new sites and SMR reactors, and states that obstructive regulations should be changed.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan actively seeks to create conditions for new nuclear power, including new sites and SMR reactors, and states that obstructive regulations should be changed. The counter-proposal wishes to limit new nuclear power to already established sites within existing energy agreement and instead let the state designate areas for offshore wind power. This conflicts with the plan, which prioritizes the marine environment over extensive wind power expansion.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill aktivt skapa förutsättningar för ny kärnkraft, inklusive nya platser och SMR-reaktorer, och slår fast att hindrande regelverk ska ändras. Motförslaget vill begränsa ny kärnkraft till redan etablerade platser inom befintlig energiöverenskommelse och i stället låta staten peka ut områden för havsbaserad vindkraft. Det strider mot planen, som prioriterar havsmiljön framför omfattande vindkraftsutbyggnad.
- new nuclear power on more sitesdecisive»Skapa förutsättningar för ny kärnkraft i Sverige och en färdplan för byggandet av SMR-reaktorer« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Create conditions for new nuclear power in Sweden and a roadmap for building SMR reactors”
- obstructive regulations away»Det finns idag regelverk i behov av förändring som förhindrar nybyggnation och omöjliggör moderna mindre reaktorer i Sverige.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“There are currently regulations in need of change that prevent new construction and make modern smaller reactors impossible in Sweden.”
- marine environment before offshore wind»Vår havs- och vattenmiljö måste prioriteras tydligare framför ett allt för intensivt fiske och omfattande vindkraftsutbyggnad.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Our marine and water environment must be prioritized more clearly ahead of overly intensive fishing and extensive wind power expansion.”
- long-term nuclear power investment»Sverigedemokraterna vill göra en långsiktig satsning på den nya generationens kärnkraft.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden Democrats wish to make a long-term investment in the next generation of nuclear power.”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:NU24)
- Committee report full text (HD01NU24)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:3961 — med anledning av prop. 2025/26:160 Ny kärnkraft i Sverige - fler möjliga platser vid kusten av Birger Lahti m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:3971 — med anledning av prop. 2025/26:160 Ny kärnkraft i Sverige - fler möjliga platser vid kusten av Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:3979 — med anledning av prop. 2025/26:160 Ny kärnkraft i Sverige - fler möjliga platser vid kusten av Rickard Nordin m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2025/26:3984 — med anledning av prop. 2025/26:160 Ny kärnkraft i Sverige - fler möjliga platser vid kusten av Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP)
- Proposition 2025/26:160 — Ny kärnkraft i Sverige - fler möjliga platser vid kusten
Source: The Swedish Parliament