2026-01-212025/26:JuU18 · p.5JuUJustice

Suitability of firearms for hunting

Ban on military-style semi-automatic weapons for hunting

What's at stake: A statutory ban would permanently close the door for hunters to use this type of weapon, while the current arrangement rests on a regulation that already blocks new permits in practice but lacks the weight of law and can be changed more easily.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is whether a statutory ban on military-style semi-automatic weapons such as AR-15-type rifles should be introduced for hunting, or whether the administrative restriction already in place since 2025 is sufficient pending a new weapons law.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee rejects the motion calling for a ban on military-style semi-automatic weapons for hunting. It points to the fact that the police authority has, since August 2025, stopped granting permits for this type of weapon, and to the ongoing work on a new weapons law, and therefore sees no reason for the Riksdag to take further action.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 2 (S, V, MP)

The reservation (S, V, MP) calls for a ban on military-style semi-automatic weapons such as AR-15-type rifles for hunting, backing the Weapons Inquiry's proposal to that effect. The reservation holds that military-style weapons have no place in hunting and that the government should submit legislation implementing the ban as soon as possible, since no such bill has yet been presented to the Riksdag despite earlier commitments to do so.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 2 by S, V, MP.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
Vown reservationNoNo 0/19/0/3follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
Sown reservationNoNo 0/92/0/14follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
MPown reservationNoNo 0/16/0/2follows the planconfidence: lownot addressed
CYesYes 20/0/0/4follows the planconfidence: lownot addressed
LNoYes 14/0/0/2departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
KDNoYes 17/0/0/2departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
MYesYes 59/0/0/9follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
SDYesYes 61/0/0/10follows the planconfidence: highexplicit

Committee proposal

The Riksdag rejects motion 2025/26:3586 by Teresa Carvalho et al. (S) request 105.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motion 2025/26:3586 av Teresa Carvalho m.fl. (S) yrkande 105.

Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected approximately 30 proposals on firearms issues in motions from the general motion period 2025. The proposals concern, among other things, suitability for possessing firearms, handling of firearms license matters and firearms amnesty. The Riksdag refers, among other things, to the work being carried out following the 2022 weapons investigation.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoNofollows the plannot addressed

The election manifesto makes the fight against access to firearms a part of crime prevention and raises parents' concern about gun violence.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto makes the fight against access to firearms a part of crime prevention and raises parents' concern about gun violence. A statutory ban on military-like semi-automatic weapons in hunting reduces the quantity of such weapons in circulation and aligns with the plan's stance that the world needs fewer weapons in circulation. The plan does not specifically address hunting weapons, so the conclusion is derived.

Original (Swedish)

Valplattformen gör kampen mot tillgången till skjutvapen till en del av brottsbekämpningen och lyfter föräldrars oro för skjutvapenvåld. Ett lagstadgat förbud mot militärliknande halvautomatiska vapen i jakten minskar mängden sådana vapen i omlopp och ligger i linje med planens hållning att världen behöver färre vapen i cirkulation. Planen behandlar inte jaktvapen särskilt, så slutsatsen härleds.

  • limit access to firearmsdecisive»kamp mot tillgången till illegala skjutvapen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“fight against access to illegal firearms”
  • stop gun violence»Föräldrar ska inte behöva oroa sig över skjutvapenvåld och drömma mardrömmar om att deras barn ska drabbas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Parents should not have to worry about gun violence and have nightmares about their children being affected.”
  • fewer weapons in circulation»Världen behöver gå mot fred, nedrustning« (party programme ↗)“The world needs to move towards peace, disarmament”
SSocialdemokraternaNoNofollows the plannot addressed

The plan wants to take decisive action against weapons in society, double the penalty for serious weapons offences and forcefully combat the organized crime that has built its capital of violence on access to weapons.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants to take decisive action against weapons in society, double the penalty for serious weapons offences and forcefully combat the organized crime that has built its capital of violence on access to weapons. A statutory ban on military-like semi-automatic weapons for hunting aligns with the restrictive weapons line and with the state maintaining the monopoly on violence. The plan does not, however, mention hunting weapons specifically.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill ta krafttag mot vapen i samhället, fördubbla straffet för grova vapenbrott och kraftfullt bekämpa den organiserade brottslighet som byggt sitt våldskapital på tillgång till vapen. Ett lagstadgat förbud mot militärliknande halvautomatiska vapen för jakt ligger i linje med den restriktiva vapenlinjen och med att staten upprätthåller våldsmonopolet. Planen nämner dock inte jaktvapen särskilt.

  • restrictive weapons policydecisive»Vi vill ta krafttag mot införsel av vapen och narkotika, bland annat genom stärkt gränskontroll.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to take decisive action against the import of weapons and narcotics, among other things through strengthened border control.”
  • toughened weapons crime penalties»Vi vill fördubbla straffet för grova vapenbrott.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to double the penalty for serious weapons offences.”
  • the state's monopoly on violence»Statens våldsmonopol upprätthålls.« (party programme ↗)“The state's monopoly on violence is upheld.”
  • combated organized crime»Kraftfullt bekämpande av organiserad kriminell verksamhet.« (party programme ↗)“Forceful combat of organized criminal activity.”
MPMiljöpartietNoNofollows the plannot addressed

The plan does not address weapon types, but establishes that all hunting shall be conducted with good hunting ethics and distances itself from forms of hunting where animals risk being exposed to suffering.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan does not address weapon types, but establishes that all hunting shall be conducted with good hunting ethics and distances itself from forms of hunting where animals risk being exposed to suffering. Military-like semi-automatic weapons have no place in such careful hunting with respect for animals and ecosystems. The plan therefore supports a legal prohibition, but the conclusion is inferred.

Original (Swedish)

Planen tar inte upp vapentyper, men slår fast att all jakt ska bedrivas med god jaktetik och tar avstånd från jaktformer där djuren riskerar att utsättas för lidande. Militärliknande halvautomatiska vapen hör inte hemma i en sådan varsam jakt med respekt för djur och ekosystem. Planen stöder därför ett lagstadgat förbud, men slutsatsen är härledd.

  • good hunting ethics requireddecisive»All jakt ska bedrivas med god jaktetik. Miljöpartiet tar avstånd från jaktformer där djuren löper stor risk att utsättas för lidande.« (party programme ↗)“All hunting shall be conducted with good hunting ethics. The Green Party distances itself from forms of hunting where animals run a great risk of being exposed to suffering.”
  • only careful hunting»Varsam jakt som bedrivs med respekt för djur och ekosystem är ett bra sätt att ta vara på delar av det som naturen kan ge oss.« (party programme ↗)“Careful hunting conducted with respect for animals and ecosystems is a good way to take advantage of parts of what nature can offer us.”
  • animals' intrinsic value»Alla djur är kännande varelser med ett egenvärde oavsett deras nytta för människan.« (party programme ↗)“All animals are sentient beings with an intrinsic value regardless of their use for humans.”
CCenterpartietYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The plan does not address weapons legislation for hunting.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan does not address weapons legislation for hunting. The nearest-lying principles are instead strong ownership, active game management and that unnecessary rules that lie like a wet blanket over rural areas should be cleared away. On the basis of these principles, the documents give no support for a new statutory ban aimed at legal hunters' weapons, especially when permits are already not being granted.

Original (Swedish)

Planen behandlar inte vapenlagstiftningen för jakt. De närmast liggande principerna är i stället en stark äganderätt, aktiv viltförvaltning och att överflödiga regler som lägger sig som en våt filt över landsbygden ska rensas bort. Utifrån dessa principer ger dokumenten inte stöd för ett nytt lagstadgat förbud riktat mot legala jägares vapen, särskilt när tillstånd redan inte beviljas.

  • fewer rules in the countrysidedecisive»Dyra, krångliga och innovationshämmande regelverk ligger som en våt filt över delar av landsbygden. Vi ska rensa upp bland överflödiga regler och byråkrati.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Expensive, complicated and innovation-hindering regulation lies like a wet blanket over parts of the countryside. We shall clear away unnecessary rules and bureaucracy.”
  • ownership and game management»Det man äger har man också ett ansvar för att vårda.« (party programme ↗)“What one owns one also has responsibility for tending.”
  • strengthened ownership»Vi vill stärka bland annat äganderätten, diskrimineringsförbudet, minoritetsskyddet och minoritetsspråkens ställning« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to strengthen among other things ownership, the ban on discrimination, minority protection and minority language position”
  • measures against gang crime»Samhället ska inte vika sig för gängen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Society shall not give way to gangs.”
LLiberalernaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan says nothing about which types of weapons may be used for hunting.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan says nothing about which types of weapons may be used for hunting. The closest principle is its consistently restrictive stance towards firearms in society, with strengthened sentences for firearms offences and the requirement that Sweden shall be a safe country where legal security applies to all. Based on that principle, a statutory ban on military-style semi-automatic weapons for hunting is in line with the plan, but the basis is weak.

Original (Swedish)

Planen säger ingenting om vilka vapentyper som får användas för jakt. Närmast liggande princip är dess konsekvent restriktiva hållning till skjutvapen i samhället, med skärpta straff för vapenbrott och kravet att Sverige ska vara ett tryggt land där rättstryggheten gäller alla. Utifrån den principen ligger ett lagfäst förbud mot militärliknande halvautomatiska vapen för jakt i linje med planen, men underlaget är svagt.

  • strengthened sentences for firearms offencesdecisive»skärpa straffen för bland annat vapenbrott, våldtäkt och utpressning« (2022 manifesto ↗)“strengthen sentences for, among other things, firearms offences, rape and extortion”
  • safe country and strong rule of law»Rättsstaten ska stärkas. Sverige ska vara ett tryggt land att leva i.« (party programme ↗)“The rule of law shall be strengthened. Sweden shall be a safe country to live in.”
  • legal security for all»Alla har rätt att leva i ett samhälle präglat av rättstrygghet.« (party programme ↗)“Everyone has the right to live in a society characterized by legal security.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

KDKristdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan does not address what types of weapons may be used for hunting.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan does not address what types of weapons may be used for hunting. The closest principles are, on one hand, the strict line against weapons crimes in the election manifesto, and on the other hand, that hunting and wildlife management are motivated as applied stewardship of natural resources — a purpose that does not require military-like semi-automatic weapons. The counter-proposal's requirement for a statutory prohibition for hunting therefore lies closest to the plan, but the conclusion is uncertain.

Original (Swedish)

Planen behandlar inte vilka vapentyper som får användas för jakt. Närmast liggande principer är dels den hårda linjen mot vapenbrott i valmanifestet, dels att jakt och viltvård motiveras som tillämpat förvaltarskap av naturresurser — ett syfte som inte kräver militärliknande halvautomatiska vapen. Motförslagets krav på ett lagstadgat förbud för jakt ligger därför närmast planen, men slutsatsen är osäker.

  • strict line against weapons crimesdecisive»Skärp straffet för vapenbrott till lägst fem års fängelse.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Increase the penalty for weapons crimes to at least five years in prison.”
  • hunting as wildlife management»Jakt, fiske och viltvård är en del i bevarandet av den biologiska mångfalden.« (party programme ↗)“Hunting, fishing and wildlife management are part of preserving biological diversity.”
  • hunting as stewardship»exempel på tillämpat förvaltarskap av naturliga resurser.« (party programme ↗)“examples of applied stewardship of natural resources.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MModeraternaYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The plan explicitly states that weapons legislation must not be shaped so that hunters, sport shooters and weapons collectors are negatively affected, and instead wants to shorten handling times for weapons licences.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan explicitly states that weapons legislation must not be shaped so that hunters, sport shooters and weapons collectors are negatively affected, and instead wants to shorten handling times for weapons licences. A statutory prohibition on a weapons type for hunting is precisely such a restriction on legal weapons owners. The plan's tightening measures are instead directed at serious weapons crimes and illegal weapons in criminal environments.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår uttryckligen fast att vapenlagstiftningen inte får utformas så att jägare, sportskyttar och vapensamlare drabbas negativt, och vill i stället korta handläggningstiderna för vapenlicenser. Ett lagstadgat förbud mot en vapentyp för jakt är just en sådan inskränkning av legala vapenägare. Planens skärpningar riktas i stället mot grova vapenbrott och illegala vapen i kriminella miljöer.

  • no restrictions for huntersdecisive»Det är viktigt att EU:s vapendirektiv inte genomförs i svensk lagstiftning så att du som är jägare, sportskytt eller vapensamlare drabbas negativt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is important that the EU's weapons directive is not implemented in Swedish legislation in a way that you as a hunter, sport shooter or weapons collector are negatively affected.”
  • simpler weapons licences»Arbeta för kortade handläggningstider för vapenlicenser« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Work to shorten handling times for weapons licences”
  • hunting as cultural heritage»Den svenska jakten är också en viktig del av vår kultur.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Swedish hunting is also an important part of our culture.”
  • harder stance on illegal weapons»Skärpa minimistraffen för grova vapenbrott från dagens 2 års fängelse till 6 års fängelse« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Tighten minimum sentences for serious weapons crimes from today's 2 years in prison to 6 years in prison”
SDSverigedemokraternaYesYesfollows the planexplicit

The plan demands that the witch hunt against hunters and legal weapon owners is stopped and points out magazine regulation as an example of measures that unnecessarily complicate legal weapon ownership.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan demands that the witch hunt against hunters and legal weapon owners is stopped and points out magazine regulation as an example of measures that unnecessarily complicate legal weapon ownership. The counter-proposal's demand for a legislated ban on military-like semi-automatic weapons for hunting is precisely such a restriction directed at legal weapon owners instead of at illegal weapons. The plan also establishes that the possibility of owning hunting weapons should be protected.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver att hetsjakten på jägare och legala vapeninnehavare stoppas och pekar ut magasinsreglering som exempel på åtgärder som i onödan försvårar legalt vapenägande. Motförslagets krav på ett lagstadgat förbud mot militärliknande halvautomatiska vapen för jakt är just en sådan inskränkning riktad mot legala vapeninnehavare i stället för mot illegala vapen. Planen slår också fast att möjligheten att äga jaktvapen ska värnas.

  • protection for legal weapon ownershipdecisive»Stoppa hetsjakten på jägare och legala vapeninnehavare« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Stop the witch hunt against hunters and legal weapon owners”
  • criticism of weapon restrictions»Magasinsreglering och förbud mot bly i ammunition är exempel på åtgärder som görs för att försvåra legalt vapenägande.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Magazine regulation and bans on lead in ammunition are examples of measures taken to complicate legal weapon ownership.”
  • direct measures at illegal weapons»Samtidigt har politiska åtgärder som borde riktats mot illegala vapen och gängbrottslighet istället riktats mot legalt vapeninnehav, svenska jägare och sportskyttar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“At the same time, political measures that should have been directed at illegal weapons and gang crime have instead been directed at legal weapons, Swedish hunters and sport shooters.”
  • protected hunting rights»Möjligheten att äga jaktvapen och att ägna sig åt jakt ska värnas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The possibility of owning hunting weapons and engaging in hunting should be protected.”

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament