2025-04-292024/25:KrU8 · p.1KrUCulture
Support for civil society
State grants to civil society and safeguards against extremist recipients
What's at stake: The decision affects how confident the public can be that state and municipal money for civil society does not end up with organisations working against democracy, and how much freedom regions and municipalities retain to decide themselves on grants to, for example, ethnic organisations.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the current democracy criteria and the granting agencies' practices are sufficient to prevent state and municipal grants from reaching organisations linked to extremism, or whether more far-reaching rules and controls than today are needed.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee welcomes the funding of projects against racism and intolerance and stresses, in line with the motions, that state grants should not go to organisations that act against society's fundamental values and human rights. It trusts that new, more uniform democracy criteria will increase predictability and legal certainty, and that strengthened support and expertise at the granting agencies will help ensure grants are used as intended. On municipal and regional funding to ethnic organisations, the committee points to local self-government, which gives regions the right to decide for themselves. The motions are therefore rejected.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 2 (C)
The reservation (C) points out that radicalisation, terrorism and violent extremism threaten liberal democracy, and that such crime is, according to the security service, dominated by violence-promoting Islamist extremism, the white-supremacist milieu, the radical-nationalist milieu and the autonomous left-wing milieu, alongside other violence-prone groups. The reservation therefore calls for more effective rules and controls to prevent public funds from reaching organisations that work against liberal democracy.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 2 by C.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have held
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: LLiberalerna, MModeraterna
Ja 187–20Ja 121–86
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | Yes | Yes 18/0/0/6 | match | confidence: medium | derived |
| S | No | Yes 87/0/0/19 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| MP | Yes | Abstain 0/0/15/3 | differs | confidence: low | derived |
| C | No | No 0/20/0/4 | match | confidence: medium | derived |
| L | No | Yes 11/0/0/5 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| KD | No | Yes 15/0/0/4 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| M | No | Yes 55/0/0/13 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| SD | No | Abstain 0/0/62/10 | differs | confidence: high | explicit |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2024/25:207 by Josef Fransson (SD) motion item 2, 2024/25:377 by Roland Utbult and Torsten Elofsson (both KD), 2024/25:421 by Markus Wiechel (SD) motion item 6, 2024/25:962 by Nima Gholam Ali Pour (SD), 2024/25:1415 by Jonas Andersson et al. (SD) motion item 9, 2024/25:1946 by Margareta Cederfelt (M), 2024/25:2643 by Leila Ali Elmi et al. (MP) motion item 32 and 2024/25:3164 by Ulrika Liljeberg et al. (C) motion item 48.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2024/25:207 av Josef Fransson (SD) yrkande 2, 2024/25:377 av Roland Utbult och Torsten Elofsson (båda KD), 2024/25:421 av Markus Wiechel (SD) yrkande 6, 2024/25:962 av Nima Gholam Ali Pour (SD), 2024/25:1415 av Jonas Andersson m.fl. (SD) yrkande 9, 2024/25:1946 av Margareta Cederfelt (M), 2024/25:2643 av Leila Ali Elmi m.fl. (MP) yrkande 32 och 2024/25:3164 av Ulrika Liljeberg m.fl. (C) yrkande 48.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected approximately 70 proposals concerning civil society, religious communities and public folk high schools in motions from the general motion period 2024. The proposals deal with, among other things, state funding, evaluation of democratic conditions, a central database for state grants to civil society, a national representative register for associations and consolidation of government agencies. The Riksdag refers, among other things, to the fact that work is already underway in many of the areas that the proposals deal with.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to introduce more effective rules and controls to prevent public funds from going to organizations that undermine liberal democracy. (C) — Reservation 2
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan is built on strong and independent social movements and wants to secure conditions that give civil society and public education great independence from the state.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan is built on strong and independent social movements and wants to secure conditions that give civil society and public education great independence from the state. The counter-proposal's demand for tightened controls against organizations deemed to obstruct liberal democracy, with left-wing movements singled out, pulls in the opposite direction and risks precisely that independence. The plan also sees civil disobedience as a legitimate last resort democratic option.
Original (Swedish)
Planen bygger på starka och självständiga folkrörelser och vill säkra villkor som ger föreningsliv och folkbildning stor självständighet gentemot staten. Motförslagets krav på skärpta kontroller mot organisationer som anses motarbeta den liberala demokratin, med vänstermiljöer utpekade, drar åt motsatt håll och riskerar just den självständigheten. Planen ser dessutom civil olydnad som en legitim yttersta demokratisk möjlighet.
- civil society's independencedecisive»Vi driver på för villkor som säkrar en stark« (party programme ↗)“We push for conditions that secure a strong”
- strong social movements»självständiga och demokratiska folkrörelser är därför en grundpelare i« (party programme ↗)“independent and democratic social movements are therefore a cornerstone in”
- civil disobedience as a democratic right»Civil olydnad är en yttersta möjlighet för människor att försvara« (party programme ↗)“Civil disobedience is an ultimate opportunity for people to defend”
- support for anti-racist movement»Vi vill vara med och bygga en bred antirasistisk rörelse som« (party programme ↗)“We want to be part of building a broad anti-racist movement that”
The party programme rejects any form of terrorist act and organized violence and states that democracy is undermined when non-democratic groups spread hatred and frighten people into silence.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme rejects any form of terrorist act and organized violence and states that democracy is undermined when non-democratic groups spread hatred and frighten people into silence. The election manifesto wants to stop fraud and misuse of public funds. More effective rules and controls that prevent state subsidies from going to organizations that work against democracy thereby align with the plan, which at the same time values civil society's conditions.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet avvisar varje form av terrorhandling och organiserat våld och slår fast att demokratin undergrävs när ickedemokratiska grupper sprider hat och skrämmer människor till tystnad. Valmanifestet vill stoppa fusk och missbruk av offentliga medel. Effektivare regler och kontroller som hindrar statsbidrag från att gå till organisationer som motarbetar demokratin ligger därmed i linje med planen, som samtidigt värnar civilsamhällets villkor.
- reject political violencedecisive»Varje form av terrorhandling, liksom organiserat våld riktat« (party programme ↗)“Any form of terrorist act, as well as organized violence directed”
- protect democracy against extremism»Demokratin undergrävs när rasistiska och andra ickedemokratiska grupper sprider sitt hat« (party programme ↗)“Democracy is undermined when racist and other non-democratic groups spread their hatred”
- stop misuse of public funds»Skattefusk, välfärdsbrottslighet och penningtvätt ska stoppas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Tax fraud, welfare crime and money laundering shall be stopped.”
- protect civil society»Ett starkt och levande civilsamhälle är demokratins underbyggnad.« (party programme ↗)“A strong and vibrant civil society is the foundation of democracy.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan establishes that democracy shall be defended with democratic means and that crime and terrorism prevention shall not happen at the expense of human rights, while at the same time civil disobedience is given a value in democracy.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that democracy shall be defended with democratic means and that crime and terrorism prevention shall not happen at the expense of human rights, while at the same time civil disobedience is given a value in democracy. The counter-proposal's broad control regime, where even the autonomous environment and animal rights activism are counted among the threats, therefore does not receive support in the plan. That the plan at the same time works forcefully against racism and fascism makes the conclusion uncertain.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att demokratin ska försvaras med demokratiska medel och att brotts- och terrorbekämpning inte får ske på bekostnad av mänskliga rättigheter, samtidigt som civil olydnad tillmäts ett värde i demokratin. Motförslagets breda kontrollregim, där även den autonoma miljön och djurrättsaktivism räknas in bland hoten, får därför inte stöd i planen. Att planen samtidigt arbetar kraftfullt mot rasism och fascism gör slutsatsen osäker.
- democratic meansdecisive»Demokratin måste försvaras med demokratiska« (party programme ↗)“Democracy must be defended with democratic”
- human rights before counter-terrorism»viktigt men ska inte ske på bekostnad av mänskliga« (party programme ↗)“important but shall not happen at the expense of human”
- the value of civil disobedience»kan civil olydnad vara betydelsefullt i demokratin.« (party programme ↗)“civil disobedience can be significant in democracy.”
- fight against racism and fascism»Vi arbetar kraftfullt mot rasism och fascism.« (party programme ↗)“We work forcefully against racism and fascism.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan makes defence of liberal democracy a main priority and wants to specifically protect democratic institutions, which supports the requirement for more effective rules against public funds going to organisations that work against democracy.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan makes defence of liberal democracy a main priority and wants to specifically protect democratic institutions, which supports the requirement for more effective rules against public funds going to organisations that work against democracy. The promise to be economical with taxpayers' money points in the same direction. The party also wants to sharpen rules against corruption and increase transparency in how public funds are used.
Original (Swedish)
Planen gör försvaret av den liberala demokratin till en huvudprioritering och vill särskilt skydda de demokratiska institutionerna, vilket bär kravet på effektivare regler mot att offentliga medel går till organisationer som motarbetar demokratin. Löftet att hushålla med skattebetalarnas pengar pekar åt samma håll. Partiet vill dessutom skärpa reglerna mot korruption och öka transparensen i hur offentliga medel används.
- protect liberal democracydecisive»Den liberala demokratin får aldrig tas för given. Den ska vårdas, värnas och vidareutvecklas — idag och för kommande generationer.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Liberal democracy must never be taken for granted. It shall be cared for, protected and developed — today and for future generations.”
- protect democratic institutions»Våra demokratiska institutioner behöver skydd.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Our democratic institutions need protection.”
- economy with public funds»Politiken ska hushålla med skattebetalarnas pengar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Politics shall be economical with taxpayers' money.”
- sharpened rules and control»Sverige ska bli ännu mer transparent. Vi vill inrätta en antikorruptionsmyndighet, skärpa regler mot korruption och införa ett lobbyregister.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden shall become even more transparent. We want to establish an anti-corruption agency, sharpen rules against corruption and introduce a lobby register.”
The party programme explicitly establishes that no tax funds shall go to activities that oppose fundamental democratic values, which is exactly what the counter-proposal demands more effective rules and controls for.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme explicitly establishes that no tax funds shall go to activities that oppose fundamental democratic values, which is exactly what the counter-proposal demands more effective rules and controls for. The election manifesto states that much more must be done when organizations from extremist circles are financed by tax funds and wants to strengthen monitoring of grant-giving. The plan furthermore identifies the same extremist circles as a threat to democracy.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår uttryckligen fast att inga skattemedel ska gå till verksamheter som motarbetar grundläggande demokratiska värderingar, vilket är exakt vad motförslaget kräver mer effektiva regler och kontroller för. Valmanifestet konstaterar att mycket mer måste göras när organisationer från extremistmiljöer finansieras av skattepengar och vill stärka uppföljningen av bidragsgivningen. Planen pekar dessutom ut samma extremistmiljöer som hot mot demokratin.
- no grants to anti-democratsdecisive»Inga skattemedel ska gå till verksamheter som vill förändra det demokratiska samhället med våld eller på annat sätt motarbetar grundläggande demokratiska värderingar.« (party programme ↗)“No tax funds shall go to activities that want to change the democratic society by violence or in other ways oppose fundamental democratic values.”
- stop extremist funding»När Säpo säger att flera organisationer från extremistmiljöer finansieras av skattepengar måste mycket mer göras.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“When the security police say that several organizations from extremist circles are financed by tax funds, much more must be done.”
- strengthened monitoring of grants»Vi vill både stärka uppföljningen av bidragsgivning och stoppa dold finansiering av trossamfund så att de inte blir verktyg för extremistiska krafter.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want both to strengthen monitoring of grant-giving and stop hidden financing of faith communities so that they do not become tools for extremist forces.”
- extremism threatens democracy»Den våldsbejakande autonoma vänstern, högerextremismen och den islamistiska extremismen utgör ett hot mot demokratin.« (party programme ↗)“The violent autonomous left, right-wing extremism and Islamist extremism constitute a threat to democracy.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan conditions public support: subsidies shall go to activities whose character and purpose are consistent with basic principles about every human's absolute and inviolable value, and evaluation and quality control are important political tasks.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan conditions public support: subsidies shall go to activities whose character and purpose are consistent with basic principles about every human's absolute and inviolable value, and evaluation and quality control are important political tasks. The counter-proposal's demand for more effective rules and controls against public funds going to organisations that want to overthrow democracy with violence follows from this. The election manifesto also identifies extremists' influence on social life as a problem that must be met.
Original (Swedish)
Planen villkorar offentligt stöd: bidrag ska gå till verksamhet vars karaktär och ändamål stämmer med grundläggande principer om varje människas absoluta och okränkbara värde, och utvärdering och kvalitetskontroll är viktiga politiska uppgifter. Motförslagets krav på effektivare regler och kontroller mot att offentliga medel går till organisationer som vill störta demokratin med våld följer av detta. Valmanifestet pekar dessutom ut extremisters påverkan på samhällslivet som ett problem som måste mötas.
- conditional public supportdecisive»Stöd ska därför utgå till de trossamfund som bedriver« (party programme ↗)“Support shall therefore go to the religious communities that conduct”
- counter extremism»Det finns också områden där islamistiska extremister har en avgörande påverkan på samhällslivet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“There are also areas where Islamist extremists have decisive influence on social life.”
- control of public funds»Utvärdering, kostnadsuppföljning och kvalitetskontroll är därför viktiga politiska« (party programme ↗)“Evaluation, cost monitoring and quality control are therefore important political”
- vital civil society»Ett vitalt civilt samhälle är av största vikt för en levande demokrati« (party programme ↗)“A vital civil society is of greatest importance for a living democracy”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan explicitly promises to stop payments of tax money to extremists and to organizations that do not share society's fundamental democratic values.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly promises to stop payments of tax money to extremists and to organizations that do not share society's fundamental democratic values. The counter-proposal's demand for more effective rules and controls against public funds going to actors who undermine liberal democracy is the same commitment. The plan also wants to strengthen the Security Police and ban participation in violence-embracing organizations.
Original (Swedish)
Planen lovar uttryckligen att stoppa utbetalningar av skattemedel till extremister och till organisationer som inte delar samhällets grundläggande demokratiska värderingar. Motförslagets krav på effektivare regler och kontroller mot att offentliga medel går till aktörer som motarbetar den liberala demokratin är samma åtagande. Planen vill dessutom stärka Säkerhetspolisen och förbjuda deltagande i våldsbejakande organisationer.
- democracy requirements for grantsdecisive»Stoppa utbetalningar av skattepengar till organisationer som inte delar det svenska samhällets grundläggande demokratiska värderingar utan som hotar människors frihet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Stop payments of tax money to organizations that do not share the Swedish society's fundamental democratic values but threaten people's freedom”
- no tax money to extremists»Stoppa utbetalningar av skattemedel till extremister« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Stop payments of tax money to extremists”
- ban violence-embracing organizations»Förbjuda deltagande i organisationer med våldsbejakande verksamhet samt förbjuda deltagande i kriminella gäng« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Ban participation in organizations with violence-embracing activities and ban participation in criminal gangs”
- protect liberal democracy»Stärka Säkerhetspolisen för att öka deras förmåga att skydda den liberala demokratin och landets alla medborgare« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen the Security Police to increase their ability to protect liberal democracy and all the country's citizens”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan explicitly demands that government support to extremist organizations is stopped and that grants to extremist think tanks within civil society cease.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly demands that government support to extremist organizations is stopped and that grants to extremist think tanks within civil society cease. The party programme conditions all public support on the activity being compatible with democratic values. The counter-proposal's demand for more effective rules and controls to prevent public funds to anti-democratic organizations is therefore the plan's own line.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver uttryckligen att statligt stöd till extremistiska organisationer stoppas och att bidrag till extremistiska idéorganisationer inom civilsamhället upphör. Partiprogrammet villkorar allt offentligt stöd med att verksamheten är förenlig med demokratiska värderingar. Motförslagets krav på effektivare regler och kontroller för att hindra offentliga medel till demokratifientliga organisationer är därmed planens egen linje.
- no grants to extremistsdecisive»Stoppa statligt stöd till extremistiska organisationer och andra grupper som verkar segregerande« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Stop government support to extremist organizations and other groups that act segregating”
- stopped grants in civil society»Stoppa bidrag till extremistiska idéorganisationer inom civilsamhället« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Stop grants to extremist think tanks within civil society”
- democracy conditions for grants»En förutsättning för att kunna erhålla stöd från det offentliga skall dock givetvis vara att den verksamhet som bedrivs är förenlig med demokratiska värderingar och en konstruktiv samhällsutveckling.« (party programme ↗)“A condition for receiving support from the public should, however, of course be that the activity conducted is compatible with democratic values and constructive social development.”
- stopped extremist financing»Hindra utländsk finansiering av extremistiska trossamfund och organisationer« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Prevent foreign financing of extremist religious communities and organizations”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2024/25:KrU8)
- Committee report full text (HC01KrU8)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2024/25:1210 — Folkbildningens roll i samhällsbygget av Mikael Larsson och Anders Karlsson (båda C)
- Motion 2024/25:127 — Stärkande av folkbildningen av Tomas Eneroth (S)
- Motion 2024/25:1337 — Kulturmiljöer av Runar Filper m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1343 — Folkbildningsfrågor av Jonas Andersson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1415 — Åtgärder mot extremism i civilsamhället av Jonas Andersson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1416 — Trossamfundsfrågor av Alexander Christiansson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1420 — Politik för ett starkt och oberoende civilsamhälle av Jonas Andersson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1430 — Vissa frågor i Mellanöstern och Afrika av Markus Wiechel m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:152 — Offentliga satsningar på musik av Mirja Räihä och Per-Arne Håkansson (båda S)
- Motion 2024/25:1585 — Minskade anslag till studieförbunden släcker lamporna på landsbygden av Karin Sundin m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2024/25:1656 — Plats på folkhögskolor för personer med funktionsnedsättning av Karin Sundin (S)
- Motion 2024/25:1709 — Stärkt folkbildning av Johanna Haraldsson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2024/25:1774 — Stärkt kulturpolitik - stärkt demokrati av Mats Berglund m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2024/25:1901 — Stärkande av civilsamhället genom folkbildning av Anders Ådahl (C)
- Motion 2024/25:1946 — Åtgärder för att minska hat mot hbtq-personer av Margareta Cederfelt (M)
- Motion 2024/25:207 — Ett civilsamhälle skilt från staten av Josef Fransson (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:2213 — Införande av ett nationellt föreningsregister av Fredrik Lundh Sammeli (S)
- Motion 2024/25:2343 — Kompetensförsörjningsinsatser i norra Sverige av Isak From m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2024/25:2443 — Förbättrade villkor för kompetensutveckling, folkbildning och högskolor av Lars Isacsson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2024/25:2450 — Föreningsfriheten och ideella föreningars oberoende av Lena Hallengren (S)
Source: The Swedish Parliament