2022-12-132022/23:FiU1 · p.1FiUEconomy & finance
Guidelines for economic and fiscal policy
What's at stake: The decision sets the framework for the entire state budget and therefore affects how much is available for welfare, labour-market measures and household support during a period of high inflation and rising interest rates. The choice between a tightening approach and more expansive spending has consequences for everyone who depends on public services, social insurance or labour-market support.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is what direction economic and fiscal policy should take during 2023: the government's restrained, tightening approach aimed at pushing back inflation without working against monetary policy while safeguarding the fiscal framework, or an alternative approach with more targeted investment in welfare, crime prevention, the climate transition, and support for households and the labour market.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee stands behind the government's guidelines and approves the fiscal policy proposal. It shares the assessment that fiscal policy should be well balanced to both push back high inflation and manage the economic downturn without working against monetary policy, and considers that more expansive alternatives risk harming the Swedish economy, households and companies. The committee notes that the fiscal framework is being safeguarded and that the budget surplus target is expected to be met in 2023.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 1 (S)
The reservation (S) calls for a policy that, without working against monetary policy, puts welfare and the fight against societal problems first. Proposals include stopping violence and breaking recruitment into serious organised crime, securing welfare funding so that children, patients and the elderly do not pay the price of the downturn, increasing the pace of the climate transition and creating green jobs, reinstating temporary employment schemes to counter long-term unemployment, making the strengthened unemployment insurance permanent, replacing the government's fuel-tax cut with a new means-tested support for high fuel prices with a rural profile, temporarily raising the child allowance during the winter months of 2023, and investing more in adult and higher education, service offices, investment support for rental housing, and restart support for the cultural sector. The reasoning is that the government's budget does not meet the difficult economic situation and, according to the reservation, involves a series of broken promises.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: approving what the committee proposes and rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by S.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Abstain 0/0/19/5 | departs from the plan | confidence: high | explicit |
| S | No | No 0/93/0/14 | follows the plan | confidence: high | explicit |
| MP | No | Abstain 0/0/16/2 | departs from the plan | confidence: high | explicit |
| C | Yes | Abstain 0/0/20/4 | departs from the plan | confidence: high | explicit |
| L | Yes | Yes 12/0/0/4 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| KD | Yes | Yes 17/0/0/2 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| M | Yes | Yes 60/0/0/8 | follows the plan | confidence: high | explicit |
| SD | Yes | Yes 61/0/0/12 | follows the plan | confidence: high | derived |
Committee proposal
Parliament approves the guidelines for economic and fiscal policy proposed by the government. Thus Parliament approves proposition 2022/23:1 financial plan point 1 and rejects the motions 2022/23:1299 by Nooshi Dadgostar et al. (V) claim 1, 2022/23:2074 by Magdalena Andersson et al. (S) claim 1, 2022/23:2180 by Annie Lööf et al. (C) claim 1 and 2022/23:2275 by Märta Stenevi et al. (MP) claim 1.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen godkänner de riktlinjer för den ekonomiska politiken och budgetpolitiken som regeringen föreslår. Därmed bifaller riksdagen proposition 2022/23:1 finansplanen punkt 1 och avslår motionerna 2022/23:1299 av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V) yrkande 1, 2022/23:2074 av Magdalena Andersson m.fl. (S) yrkande 1, 2022/23:2180 av Annie Lööf m.fl. (C) yrkande 1 och 2022/23:2275 av Märta Stenevi m.fl. (MP) yrkande 1.
Riksdag decision: The government has proposed expenditure ceilings and revenue estimates for the state budget in the budget proposal for 2023. Expenditures are estimated at 1,195 billion kronor and revenues are estimated at 1,279 billion kronor. This means a surplus in the state budget of 84 billion kronor for 2023. The expenditure ceiling for the state is 1,665 billion kronor for 2023, 1,745 billion for 2024 and 1,825 billion for 2025. The budget proposal also contains proposals on tax and fee rules that include enhanced earned income tax credit for persons over 65 years increased tax on alcohol and tobacco enhanced tax reduction for installation of solar cells temporary reduction in tax on fuel reduced tax on fuels in certain heat production maintained travel deduction with certain enhancements for work trips, business trips and return trips. Some of these proposals have been presented in separate propositions, but are announced in the budget proposal and are included in the calculations of revenues in the budget. Parliament approved the government's proposal on the frameworks for the state budget for 2023. Parliament's decision on the frameworks for the state budget is then governing when Parliament in the next step decides on appropriations for the 27 expenditure areas in the budget. All legislative changes enter into force on 1 January 2023 except the decisions concerning abolished tax reduction for server halls and a clearer chemical tax, which enter into force on 1 July 2023. As regards increased tax on alcohol and tobacco, the legislative changes enter into force on 1 January 2023 and 1 January 2024 respectively. Parliament also approved the government's direction for economic and fiscal policy. GDP developed relatively strongly during the first half of 2022, but development is expected to weaken in the future. Growth is expected to be negative next year and the Swedish economy is expected to be in a low-growth period in 2023. Fiscal policy should be mildly contractionary in order not to counteract monetary policy in a situation where high inflation could take hold. Policy should in the near term be focused on measures that support companies and households that are pressured by rising prices. This includes, among other things, a temporary high-cost protection for electricity costs and an extension of the temporary additional allowance for families with children receiving housing assistance. Temporary tax reductions on fuel are to alleviate the consequences for those dependent on cars in rural areas and for companies in agriculture and forestry. General government grants to municipalities and regions are strengthened. Parliament made a decision in the matter despite the fact that it was available for less than two working days before the day it was dealt with, which is the usual procedure.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to prioritize welfare investments with spending on labor market policy, healthcare, elderly care, and schools, and accelerate climate transformation. (S) — Reservation 1
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan is built on the conviction that far more resources should be spent on welfare, climate investments, care and employment policy than other parties want, with a massive green investment programme and a good unemployment insurance as key demands.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan is built on the conviction that far more resources should be spent on welfare, climate investments, care and employment policy than other parties want, with a massive green investment programme and a good unemployment insurance as key demands. The counter-proposal's guidelines—welfare's financing, increased pace of climate transition, strengthened unemployment insurance and investments in education and housing—are in substance the same priorities. The plan also makes full employment an overarching goal, against the committee's stricter line.
Original (Swedish)
Planen bygger på att mycket mer resurser ska satsas på välfärd, klimatinvesteringar, vård och jobbpolitik än andra partier vill, med ett massivt grönt investeringsprogram och en bra a-kassa som bärande krav. Motförslagets riktlinjer – välfärdens finansiering, ökad takt i klimatomställningen, förstärkt arbetslöshetsförsäkring och satsningar på utbildning och bostäder – är i sak samma prioriteringar. Planen gör dessutom full sysselsättning till överordnat mål, mot utskottets stramare linje.
- more resources for welfare and climatedecisive»Att vi i Vänsterpartiet anser att mycket mer resurser ska och kan satsas på välfärd, klimatinvesteringar, vård och jobbpolitik än vad de andra partierna gör« (2022 manifesto ↗)“That we in the Left Party believe that far more resources should and can be spent on welfare, climate investments, care and employment policy than what the other parties want”
- strengthened unemployment insurance»Du som blir arbetslös ska veta att du får en bra a-kassa« (2022 manifesto ↗)“You who become unemployed should know that you get a good unemployment insurance”
- massive green investment programme»Vänsterpartiet föreslår ett massivt investeringsprogram för den gröna industrin.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Left Party proposes a massive investment programme for the green industry.”
- full employment as a goal»Ändå är det bara ett parti i riksdagen som har en politik för full sysselsättning« (2022 manifesto ↗)“And yet it is only one party in parliament that has a policy for full employment”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The counter-proposal's priorities are those of the election manifesto: increased state grants to municipalities and regions instead of major tax cuts, a permanent increase in unemployment insurance, measures against gang crime with at least as much to preventive work and a faster climate transition with green jobs.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal's priorities are those of the election manifesto: increased state grants to municipalities and regions instead of major tax cuts, a permanent increase in unemployment insurance, measures against gang crime with at least as much to preventive work and a faster climate transition with green jobs. The manifesto also favours targeted and smart support that does not drive inflation, which corresponds to a means-tested fuel support with rural profile rather than a broad fuel tax reduction. The plan thus supports the counter-proposal's substantive position.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslagets prioriteringar är valmanifestets: ökade statsbidrag till kommuner och regioner istället för stora skattesänkningar, en permanentad höjd arbetslöshetsersättning, insatser mot gängkriminalitet med minst lika mycket till förebyggande arbete och en snabbare klimatomställning med gröna jobb. Manifestet förordar dessutom riktade och smarta stöd som inte driver på inflationen, vilket motsvarar ett inkomstprövat drivmedelsstöd med glesbygdsprofil framför en bred bränsleskattesänkning. Planen stöder därmed motförslagets linje i sak.
- welfare before tax cutsdecisive»Vi vill fortsätta öka statens bidrag till kommuner och regioner. Stora skattesänkningar omöjliggör det.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to continue increasing the state's contributions to municipalities and regions. Major tax cuts make that impossible.”
- targeted support without inflation driving»Med riktade och smarta stöd kan vi stötta människor utan att driva på inflationen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“With targeted and smart support we can help people without driving inflation.”
- permanent strengthened unemployment insurance»Därför vill vi permanenta den höjda ersättningen i arbetslöshetsersättningen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Therefore we want to make permanent the increased unemployment insurance.”
- crime and causes of crime»För varje krona som läggs på fler poliser, ska minst en krona läggas på det förebyggande arbetet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“For every krona spent on more police, at least one krona must be spent on preventive work.”
The election manifesto wants to invest at least 100 billion per year in the transition, build strong safety nets and phase out fossil subsidies.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto wants to invest at least 100 billion per year in the transition, build strong safety nets and phase out fossil subsidies. The counter-proposal's requirements for higher climate pace and green jobs, secured welfare financing, strengthened unemployment insurance and that the fuel tax reduction is replaced by targeted support lie in line with this. The plan at the same time requires that fiscal policy dampens cyclical fluctuations and works for stable prices, which the counter-proposal explicitly respects. The plan therefore supports the counter-proposal's guidelines.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet vill investera minst 100 miljarder per år i omställningen, bygga starka skyddsnät och fasa ut fossila subventioner. Motförslagets krav på högre klimattakt och gröna jobb, säkrad välfärdsfinansiering, förstärkt arbetslöshetsförsäkring och att bränsleskattesänkningen ersätts av ett riktat stöd ligger i linje med detta. Planen kräver samtidigt att finanspolitiken dämpar konjunktursvängningar och verkar för stabila priser, vilket motförslaget uttryckligen respekterar. Planen stöder därför motförslagets riktlinjer.
- substantial climate transitiondecisive»investera minst 100 miljarder per år i att ställa om så att Sverige blir ett fossilfritt välfärdsland senast år 2030« (2022 manifesto ↗)“invest at least 100 billion per year in the transition so that Sweden becomes a fossil-free welfare state by at the latest 2030”
- strong safety nets»Vi vill bygga skyddsnäten starka så att alla kan vara trygga och ingen lämnas utanför« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to build strong safety nets so that everyone can be secure and no one is left out”
- no fossil subsidies»fasa ut fossila subventioner« (2022 manifesto ↗)“phase out fossil subsidies”
- stabilization policy and stable prices»dämpa effekter av konjunkturvariationer och verka för stabila priser« (party programme ↗)“dampen effects of cyclical fluctuations and work for stable prices”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The election manifesto requires that the total tax burden is lowered, that no job-damaging tax increases are carried out and that more is placed on the core of welfare and less on benefits.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto requires that the total tax burden is lowered, that no job-damaging tax increases are carried out and that more is placed on the core of welfare and less on benefits. The counter-proposal's more expansive line with permanent enhanced unemployment insurance, reinstated extra jobs and raised child benefit goes against this, as does that the fuel tax reduction is replaced by a new income-tested support. The plan sees unemployment insurance as a transition insurance and puts the fiscal policy framework first.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet kräver att det totala skattetrycket sänks, att inga jobbskadliga skattehöjningar genomförs och att mer läggs på välfärdens kärna och mindre på bidrag. Motförslagets mer expansiva linje med permanent förstärkt arbetslöshetsförsäkring, återinförda extratjänster och höjt barnbidrag går emot detta, liksom att bränsleskattesänkningen ersätts med ett nytt inkomstprövat stöd. Planen ser a-kassan som en omställningsförsäkring och sätter det finanspolitiska ramverket främst.
- lowered total tax burdendecisive»Det totala skattetrycket måste ner nästa mandatperiod. Vi kommer inte att medverka till några skattehöjningar som skadar jobben, det egna sparandet eller gör det dyrare att bo.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The total tax burden must come down next parliamentary term. We will not participate in any tax increases that damage jobs, personal saving or make housing more expensive.”
- less to benefits»Politiken ska hushålla med skattebetalarnas pengar. Mer pengar ska läggas på välfärdens kärna, mindre på bidrag.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Politics shall be economical with taxpayers' money. More money shall be placed on the core of welfare, less on benefits.”
- lower fuel tax»Sänk skatten maximalt på biodrivmedel som blandas in i bensin och diesel.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Lower the tax maximally on biofuels blended into petrol and diesel.”
- unemployment insurance as transition insurance»Arbetslöshetsförsäkringen ska vara en allmän och tydlig omställningsförsäkring.« (party programme ↗)“Unemployment insurance shall be a general and clear transition insurance.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The counter-proposal is a more expansive line with permanently strengthened unemployment insurance, increased child allowance and new benefits.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal is a more expansive line with permanently strengthened unemployment insurance, increased child allowance and new benefits. The plan's core commitments go in the opposite direction: inflation pressure shall be countered, more shall contribute and fewer shall receive benefits, and a benefits cap shall be introduced. The plan furthermore wants unemployment compensation to be phased down over time rather than permanently maintained at a higher level, even though individual elements such as the fight against gang violence and climate transition lie close to the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslaget är en mer expansiv linje med permanent förstärkt arbetslöshetsförsäkring, höjt barnbidrag och nya stöd. Planens bärande åtaganden går i motsatt riktning: inflationstrycket ska motas, fler ska bidra och färre gå på bidrag, och ett bidragstak ska införas. Planen vill dessutom att arbetslöshetsersättningen trappas ner över tid snarare än permanentas på en högre nivå, även om enskilda delar som kampen mot gängvåldet och klimatomställningen ligger nära planen.
- the work line before benefitsdecisive»Fler måste bidra – färre måste gå på bidrag.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“More must contribute – fewer shall receive benefits.”
- cap on total benefits»Därför vill vi modernisera bidragssystemet genom ett bidragstak – de samlade bidragen ska inte kunna vara högre än de lägsta kollektivavtalade lönerna.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“That is why we want to modernize the benefit system through a benefits cap – the total benefits shall not be able to exceed the lowest collectively agreed wages.”
- counter inflation»Vi vill mota inflationstrycket.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to counter inflation pressure.”
- phased-down unemployment compensation»ersättningsnivån ska vara generösare i början, för att successivt trappas ner« (party programme ↗)“the compensation level shall be more generous at first, to be gradually phased down”
Worldstate weighed in: Inflation 10.9 per cent annually — Sharpens the plan's demand for tight fiscal policy and makes an expansive line harder to reconcile with the plan.
The counter-proposal wants a more expansive direction and replace the fuel tax reduction with an income-tested support, while permanently strengthening unemployment insurance and reinstating make-work programmes.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal wants a more expansive direction and replace the fuel tax reduction with an income-tested support, while permanently strengthening unemployment insurance and reinstating make-work programmes. The election manifesto's stated commitment is to significantly lower petrol and diesel prices for everyone, and the party programme requires restraint in public spending, low inflation and that benefit dependency is countered. The plan therefore speaks against the counter-proposal's direction, although parts on security and welfare coincide.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslaget vill en mer expansiv inriktning och ersätta bränsleskattesänkningen med ett inkomstprövat stöd, samtidigt som arbetslöshetsersättningen permanent förstärks och extratjänster återinförs. Valmanifestets uttalade åtagande är att sänka bensin- och dieselpriserna rejält för alla, och principprogrammet kräver återhållsamhet i de offentliga utgifterna, låg inflationstakt och att bidragsberoende motverkas. Planen talar därför mot motförslagets inriktning, även om delar om trygghet och välfärd sammanfaller.
- reduced fuel prices for everyonedecisive»Sänk bensin- och dieselpriserna rejält för alla, främst genom minskad inblandningen av dyrt biobränsle.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Lower petrol and diesel prices significantly for everyone, primarily by reducing the costly blending of biofuel.”
- restrained public spending»återhållsamhet i de offentliga utgifterna.« (party programme ↗)“restraint in public spending.”
- low inflation»Därför ska låg inflationstakt eftersträvas.« (party programme ↗)“Therefore, low inflation rate should be pursued.”
- counter benefit dependency»uppmuntras, och att bidragsberoende motverkas.« (party programme ↗)“encouraged, and that benefit dependency is countered.”
Worldstate weighed in: Inflation 10.9 per cent year-on-year — Gives the plan's requirements for restraint and low inflation decisive weight against an expansive budget; Electricity price in SE3 around 2.66 SEK/kWh — Speaks for broad cost relief rather than new income-tested support
The counter-proposal wants a more expansionary policy with permanently reinforced unemployment insurance, reintroduced extra jobs, raised child benefit and a removed fuel tax reduction.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal wants a more expansionary policy with permanently reinforced unemployment insurance, reintroduced extra jobs, raised child benefit and a removed fuel tax reduction. The election manifesto values the surplus target, requires that new reforms are financed, identifies the unemployment insurance increase as a weakening of the work line and explicitly promises lower petrol and diesel prices. The counter-proposal's demands therefore conflict with the plan on several decisive points.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslaget vill föra en mer expansiv politik med permanent förstärkt a-kassa, återinförda extratjänster, höjt barnbidrag och en slopad bränsleskattesänkning. Valmanifestet värnar överskottsmålet, kräver att nya reformer finansieras, pekar ut a-kassehöjningen som en försvagning av arbetslinjen och lovar uttryckligen sänkta bensin- och dieselpriser. Motförslagets krav strider därför mot planen på flera avgörande punkter.
- valued surplus targetdecisive»Överskottsmålet ska värnas och det är inte aktuellt att övergå till ett balansmål.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The surplus target shall be valued and it is not appropriate to move to a balanced target.”
- work line before unemployment insurance»Arbetslinjen försvagas ytterligare av att regeringens höjning av a-kassan gjort att även de som nyss blivit arbetslösa tackar nej till jobb.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The work line is further weakened by the government's increase in unemployment insurance causing even those who have just become unemployed to turn down jobs.”
- lower fuel prices»Sänka priset på bensin och diesel så att du klarar din vardagsekonomi« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Lower the price of petrol and diesel so that you can manage your everyday economy”
- financed reforms»Alla nya löften och reformer – som till exempel våra inkomstskattesänkningar – behöver finansieras eller rymmas inom överskottsmålet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“All new promises and reforms – such as our income tax cuts – need to be financed or fit within the surplus target.”
Worldstate weighed in: Inflation around 10 per cent and rising key rate — Reinforces the plan's demand for strict and financed fiscal policy that does not counteract monetary policy
The counter-proposal wants to replace the fuel tax reduction with means-tested support, increase the pace of climate transition and reintroduce make-work programs.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal wants to replace the fuel tax reduction with means-tested support, increase the pace of climate transition and reintroduce make-work programs. The plan demands the exact opposite, that gasoline and diesel prices are reduced through lower fuel tax and that inefficient labor market programs that hide unemployment are abolished. The plan also wants to reduce costs for climate measures that can be made more effective, not increase them.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslaget vill ersätta bränsleskattesänkningen med ett inkomstprövat stöd, öka takten i klimatomställningen och återinföra extratjänster. Planen kräver rakt motsatt att bensin- och dieselpriset sänks genom sänkt bränsleskatt och att ineffektiva arbetsmarknadsprogram som döljer arbetslöshet avskaffas. Planen vill dessutom minska kostnaderna för klimatåtgärder som kan göras effektivare, inte öka dem.
- lower fuel taxdecisive»Sänka bensin- och dieselpriset genom sänkt bränsleskatt och minskad reduktionsplikt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Reduce gasoline and diesel prices through lower fuel tax and reduced mandatory blending obligation.”
- no make-work jobs»Avskaffa ineffektiva arbetsmarknads- och integrationsprogram som är skapade för att dölja arbetslöshet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Abolish ineffective labor market and integration programs that are created to hide unemployment”
- lower costs for climate measures»Minska kostnaderna för migrationspolitik, bistånd, EU-bidrag och klimatåtgärder som kan göras mer effektiva« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Reduce costs for migration policy, aid, EU grants and climate measures that can be made more effective”
- sound public finances»Sunda statsfinanser och respekt för målet om överskott« (party programme ↗)“Sound public finances and respect for the surplus target”
Worldstate weighed in: Inflation of 10.9 percent and policy rate of 2.5 percent — Strengthens the plan's demand for restraint and argues against a more expansive budget; Electricity price in SE3 at 2.66 kr/kWh — Sharpens the plan's demand for lower energy and fuel costs for households
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2022/23:FiU1)
- Committee report full text (HA01FiU1)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2021/22:4772 — med anledning av prop. 2021/22:245 Höjd skatt på alkohol och tobak av Niklas Wykman m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2021/22:4773 — med anledning av prop. 2021/22:245 Höjd skatt på alkohol och tobak av Eric Westroth m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2021/22:4774 — med anledning av prop. 2021/22:245 Höjd skatt på alkohol och tobak av Helena Vilhelmsson och Per Åsling (båda C)
- Motion 2022/23:1299 — En rättvis väg genom krisen - Vänsterpartiets budgetmotion för 2023 av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2022/23:2074 — Vårt Sverige kan bättre av Magdalena Andersson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2022/23:2180 — Jobben, klimatet och hela landet - Centerpartiets budgetmotion för 2023 av Annie Lööf m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2022/23:2275 — Vi bygger det nya gröna folkhemmet - Miljöpartiets budgetmotion för 2023 av Märta Stenevi m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2022/23:2283 — med anledning av prop. 2022/23:15 Förstärkt skattereduktion för installation av solceller av Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2022/23:2284 — med anledning av prop. 2022/23:15 Förstärkt skattereduktion för installation av solceller av Martin Ådahl och Rickard Nordin (båda C)
- Motion 2022/23:2285 — med anledning av prop. 2022/23:17 Tillfälligt sänkt skatt på drivmedel och sänkt skatt på bränslen i viss värmeproduktion av Ali Esbati m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2022/23:2286 — med anledning av prop. 2022/23:18 Bibehållet reseavdrag med vissa förstärkningar för arbetsresor, tjänsteresor och hemresor av Ali Esbati m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2022/23:2288 — med anledning av prop. 2022/23:18 Bibehållet reseavdrag med vissa förstärkningar för arbetsresor, tjänsteresor och hemresor av Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2022/23:2289 — med anledning av prop. 2022/23:17 Tillfälligt sänkt skatt på drivmedel och sänkt skatt på bränslen i viss värmeproduktion av Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2022/23:2290 — med anledning av prop. 2022/23:18 Bibehållet reseavdrag med vissa förstärkningar för arbetsresor, tjänsteresor och hemresor av Martin Ådahl (C)
- Motion 2022/23:2291 — med anledning av prop. 2022/23:17 Tillfälligt sänkt skatt på drivmedel och sänkt skatt på bränslen i viss värmeproduktion av Martin Ådahl (C)
- Motion 2022/23:2294 — med anledning av prop. 2022/23:18 Bibehållet reseavdrag med vissa förstärkningar för arbetsresor, tjänsteresor och hemresor av Daniel Helldén m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2022/23:2295 — med anledning av prop. 2022/23:17 Tillfälligt sänkt skatt på drivmedel och sänkt skatt på bränslen i viss värmeproduktion av Janine Alm Ericson m.fl. (MP)
- Proposition 2021/22:245 — Höjd skatt på alkohol och tobak
- Proposition 2022/23:1 — Budgetpropositionen för 2023
- Proposition 2022/23:15 — Förstärkt skattereduktion för installation av solceller
Source: The Swedish Parliament