2026-03-042025/26:CU20 · p.10CUCivil law & housing

Water infrastructure and its financing

Financing and renewal of water and sewage infrastructure

What's at stake: Many municipalities have under-invested in their water and sewage facilities for a long time and charged low fees, while climate change increases the demands on treatment plants and pipe networks. The decision affects how soon municipalities get better financial conditions to renew drinking-water and sewage systems, which concerns every household connected to the municipal water supply.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is whether Parliament should already now instruct the government to review municipalities' ability to invest in and charge fees for water and sewage infrastructure, or whether the outcome of the ongoing inquiry into water-service preparedness should be awaited.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee rejects the motions and notes that the Water-Service Preparedness Inquiry's proposals for tighter requirements on water-utility finances, greater scope for fee increases, and an investment programme are already being processed within the Government Offices, and holds that the outcome of that ongoing work should not be pre-empted.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 16 (S)

The reservation (S) wants a review of the conditions for investment and reinvestment in the water-service network and the removal of significant obstacles to this, since many municipalities today lack the financial means to carry out necessary renovations of treatment plants and other water-service facilities.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 16 by S.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
VNoYes 19/0/0/3departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
Sown reservationNoNo 0/93/0/13follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
MPNoAbstain 0/0/15/3departs from the planconfidence: highnot addressed
CNoAbstain 0/0/21/3departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
LNoYes 14/0/0/2departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
KDNoYes 16/0/0/3departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
MNoYes 60/0/0/8departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
SDNoYes 61/0/0/10departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed

Committee proposal

The Riksdag rejects the motions 2025/26:600 by Marie Olsson (S), 2025/26:635 by Hanna Westerén and others (S), 2025/26:1473 by Eric Westroth (SD), 2025/26:1527 by Emma Ahlström Köster (M) claim 4, 2025/26:1726 by Hans Eklind (KD), 2025/26:2291 by Linnéa Wickman and others (S), 2025/26:2825 by Stina Larsson and others (C) claim 2, 2025/26:3114 by Sten Bergheden (M), 2025/26:3140 by Cecilia Rönn (L), 2025/26:3185 by Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist and others (C) claim 35, 2025/26:3368 by Amanda Palmstierna and others (MP) claims 6, 7 and 10, 2025/26:3582 by Rickard Nordin and others (C) claim 33 and 2025/26:3732 by Åsa Westlund and others (S) claim 13.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2025/26:600 av Marie Olsson (S), 2025/26:635 av Hanna Westerén m.fl. (S), 2025/26:1473 av Eric Westroth (SD), 2025/26:1527 av Emma Ahlström Köster (M) yrkande 4, 2025/26:1726 av Hans Eklind (KD), 2025/26:2291 av Linnéa Wickman m.fl. (S), 2025/26:2825 av Stina Larsson m.fl. (C) yrkande 2, 2025/26:3114 av Sten Bergheden (M), 2025/26:3140 av Cecilia Rönn (L), 2025/26:3185 av Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist m.fl. (C) yrkande 35, 2025/26:3368 av Amanda Palmstierna m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 6, 7 och 10, 2025/26:3582 av Rickard Nordin m.fl. (C) yrkande 33 och 2025/26:3732 av Åsa Westlund m.fl. (S) yrkande 13.

Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected 115 proposals in motions from the general motion period of 2025. The proposals concern, among other things, matters of national interest (areas designated because they contain nationally or regionally important values and qualities), protection of agricultural land and water areas, permits for water activities, and agency cooperation and national water coordination. The Riksdag refers, among other things, to work that is already underway in the areas that the proposals address.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan requires that the state step in and take greater responsibility for the expansion of infrastructure and that redistribution to municipalities that cannot make ends meet increases.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan requires that the state step in and take greater responsibility for the expansion of infrastructure and that redistribution to municipalities that cannot make ends meet increases. Examining the conditions for investments in the water system and removing obstacles hits exactly the situation the plan describes. The plan also establishes that incomes and costs shall be distributed solidaristically across the country, which speaks against the upgrading getting stuck in weak municipalities.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver att staten går in och tar ett större ansvar för utbyggnaden av infrastruktur och att omfördelningen till kommuner som inte får ihop sin ekonomi ökar. Att se över förutsättningarna för investeringar i va-nätet och undanröja hindren träffar exakt den situation planen beskriver. Planen slår också fast att inkomster och kostnader ska fördelas solidariskt över landet, vilket talar mot att upprustningen fastnar på svaga kommuner.

  • state responsibility for infrastructuredecisive»Utbyggnaden av transportinfrastruktur och fiber går alldeles för sakta, staten behöver gå in och ta ett större ansvar för utbyggnaden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The expansion of transport infrastructure and fiber is going far too slowly, the state needs to step in and take greater responsibility for expansion.”
  • increased redistribution to municipalities»Omfördelningen från stat till region och kommun måste öka och särskild hänsyn ska tas till de många kommuner och regioner som idag inte får ihop sin ekonomi« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Redistribution from state to region and municipality must increase and special attention shall be paid to the many municipalities and regions that today cannot make ends meet”
  • solidaristic distribution of costs»Inkomster och kostnader behöver fördelas solidariskt över landet.« (party programme ↗)“Incomes and costs need to be distributed solidaristically across the country.”
  • service throughout the country»Skola, vård, omsorg och annan service behöver fungera överallt.« (party programme ↗)“Schools, healthcare, care and other services need to work everywhere.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

SSocialdemokraternaNoNofollows the plannot addressed

The plan promises continued increased state grants to municipalities and regions and demands clean water throughout Sweden and equivalent public services regardless of where one lives.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan promises continued increased state grants to municipalities and regions and demands clean water throughout Sweden and equivalent public services regardless of where one lives. The programme also sees infrastructure in all municipalities as an expression of practical solidarity. Removing obstacles to investment in water and sewerage networks when municipalities lack economic resources follows from these commitments.

Original (Swedish)

Planen lovar fortsatt ökade statsbidrag till kommuner och regioner och kräver rent vatten i hela Sverige samt likvärdig samhällsservice oavsett var man bor. Programmet ser också infrastruktur i samtliga kommuner som ett uttryck för praktisk solidaritet. Att undanröja hinder för investeringar i va-nätet när kommuner saknar ekonomiska förutsättningar följer av dessa åtaganden.

  • clean water throughout the countrydecisive»Giftfri miljö med ren luft och rent vatten i hela Sverige.« (party programme ↗)“Toxic-free environment with clean air and clean water throughout Sweden.”
  • increased state grants»Vi vill fortsätta öka statens bidrag till kommuner och regioner.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to continue increasing the state's contributions to municipalities and regions.”
  • infrastructure in all municipalities»Investeringar i goda kommunikationer och en stark modern infrastruktur i samtliga kommuner« (party programme ↗)“Investment in good communications and strong modern infrastructure in all municipalities”
  • equivalent service»God service och välfärd till medborgarna oavsett var i landet de bor.« (party programme ↗)“Good service and welfare for citizens regardless of where in the country they live.”
MPMiljöpartietNoAbstaindeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan wants to strengthen environmental adaptation of water and sewage systems to increase resilience against floods and droughts, and points to overloaded treatment plants as a growing risk.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants to strengthen environmental adaptation of water and sewage systems to increase resilience against floods and droughts, and points to overloaded treatment plants as a growing risk. It also establishes that municipalities cannot bear the entire financial responsibility for necessary conversion investments without the state contributing. Removing obstacles to investments in the water-sewage network follows from these commitments.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill stärka miljöanpassningen av vatten- och avloppssystem för att öka resiliensen mot översvämningar och torka, och pekar ut överbelastade reningsverk som en växande risk. Den slår också fast att kommunerna inte kan bära hela det ekonomiska ansvaret för nödvändiga omställningsinvesteringar utan att staten bidrar. Att undanröja hinder för investeringar i va-nätet följer av dessa åtaganden.

  • environmentally adapted water-sewage systemsdecisive»Vi i Miljöpartiet vill även stärka miljöanpassning av vatten- och avloppssystem för att öka resiliensen mot översvämningar och torka.« (party programme ↗)“We in the Green Party also want to strengthen environmental adaptation of water and sewage systems to increase resilience against floods and droughts.”
  • treatment plants' vulnerability»Med fler former av extremväder ökar risken för minskade grundvattennivåer, överbelastade reningsverk och föroreningar i våra vattentäkter.« (party programme ↗)“With more forms of extreme weather, the risk increases for decreased groundwater levels, overloaded treatment plants, and pollution in our water sources.”
  • the state shall contribute to investments»Kommuner kan inte bära hela det ekonomiska ansvaret för en sådan omställning – staten måste bidra.« (party programme ↗)“Municipalities cannot bear the entire financial responsibility for such a transition – the state must contribute.”
  • sharp regulations for water»Det behövs skarpa regleringar av sådant som påverkar våra vatten negativt.« (party programme ↗)“Sharp regulations are needed for things that negatively affect our water.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

CCenterpartietNoAbstaindeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan establishes that access to clean water is a fundamental right and that public services shall be close and reliable throughout the country, with equal conditions for all parts of the country.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan establishes that access to clean water is a fundamental right and that public services shall be close and reliable throughout the country, with equal conditions for all parts of the country. Reviewing investment conditions and removing obstacles when municipalities lack funds to upgrade sewage treatment plants follows from these commitments and from the goal of saving lakes and waterways. The plan does not address sewage rates or investment programmes, so the conclusion is derived.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att tillgång till rent vatten är en fundamental rätt och att offentlig service ska vara nära och pålitlig i hela landet, med likvärdiga förutsättningar för alla delar av landet. Att se över investeringsförutsättningarna och undanröja hinder när kommuner saknar ekonomi att rusta reningsverk följer av dessa åtaganden och av målet att rädda sjöar och vattendrag. Planen behandlar inte va-taxor eller investeringsprogram, varför slutsatsen härleds.

  • right to clean waterdecisive»Tillgång till rent vatten, ren luft och giftfri miljö är en fundamental rätt för alla människor« (party programme ↗)“Access to clean water, clean air and a poison-free environment is a fundamental right for all people”
  • reliable services throughout the country»Offentlig service ska vara nära och pålitlig i hela landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Public services should be close and reliable throughout the country.”
  • cleaner water»Rädda Sveriges sjöar, vattendrag och hav.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Save Sweden's lakes, waterways and seas.”
  • equal conditions»Alla delar av landet ska ges likvärdiga förutsättningar för utveckling och tillväxt.« (party programme ↗)“All parts of the country shall be given equal conditions for development and growth.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

LLiberalernaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan states that everyone has the right to clean water and that drinking water supply must be secured, and that Sweden needs continued large investments in infrastructure.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan states that everyone has the right to clean water and that drinking water supply must be secured, and that Sweden needs continued large investments in infrastructure. A neglected water and sewerage network threatens both commitments and also drives the nutrient leakage the plan wants to brake. Reviewing investment prerequisites and removing obstacles thereby follows from the plan.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att alla har rätt till rent vatten och att dricksvattenförsörjningen måste säkras, och att Sverige behöver fortsatt stora investeringar i infrastruktur. Ett eftersatt va-nät hotar båda åtagandena och driver dessutom det näringsläckage planen vill bromsa. Att se över investeringsförutsättningarna och undanröja hinder följer därför av planen.

  • secured drinking water supplydecisive»Alla har rätt till rent vatten. Dricksvattenförsörjningen måste säkras och fler yt- och grundvattentäkter ges skydd.« (party programme ↗)“Everyone has the right to clean water. Drinking water supply must be secured and more surface and groundwater sources be given protection.”
  • investments in infrastructure»Sverige behöver fortsatt stora investeringar i infrastruktur.« (party programme ↗)“Sweden needs continued large investments in infrastructure.”
  • reduced nutrient leakage»Läckaget av näringsämnen från odlingsmark och hushåll ut i sjöar, vattendrag och hav behöver bromsas och hållbar återvinning av biologiskt avfall introduceras i bred skala.« (party programme ↗)“Leakage of nutrients from farmland and households into lakes, watercourses and sea needs to be braked and sustainable recycling of biological waste introduced on a broad scale.”
  • clean water»Samtidigt behövs fortsatta insatser för att förhindra att skräp och föroreningar, som plast och läkemedel, sprids i våra vatten.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“At the same time, continued measures are needed to prevent rubbish and pollution, such as plastic and medicines, from spreading in our waters.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

KDKristdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan states that it is a state task to support municipalities lacking sufficient tax base for their statutory obligations, and the subsidiarity principle requires the higher level to support where the lower level cannot manage the task.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan states that it is a state task to support municipalities lacking sufficient tax base for their statutory obligations, and the subsidiarity principle requires the higher level to support where the lower level cannot manage the task. Water and sanitation supply is such a statutory obligation. Reviewing investment conditions and removing obstacles therefore lies in line with the plan's commitments.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att det är en statlig uppgift att stödja kommuner som saknar tillräckligt skatteunderlag för sina lagstadgade skyldigheter, och subsidiaritetsprincipen ålägger den högre nivån att stödja där den lägre inte klarar uppgiften. Va-försörjningen är en sådan lagstadgad skyldighet. Att se över investeringsförutsättningarna och undanröja hindren ligger därför i linje med planens åtaganden.

  • state support to weak municipalitiesdecisive»Det är en statlig uppgift att stödja kommuner som inte har ett tillräckligt skatteunderlag för« (party programme ↗)“It is a state task to support municipalities that do not have a sufficient tax base for”
  • the support principle in subsidiarity»inte på ett ändamålsenligt sätt klarar av ska de större gemenskaperna ta ansvar för.« (party programme ↗)“cannot appropriately manage shall the larger communities take responsibility for.”
  • municipal supply responsibility»Kommunerna ska ha det sociala ansvaret för att trygga bostadsförsörjningen för sina« (party programme ↗)“Municipalities shall have the social responsibility to secure housing provision for their”
  • state municipal equalisation»Systemet för kommunal utjämning ska vara statligt och så utformat att konsekvenserna av« (party programme ↗)“The system for municipal equalisation shall be state-run and designed so that the consequences of”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MModeraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The counter-proposal wants to review the preconditions for investment in water and sewerage networks and remove obstacles, since many municipalities cannot manage to upgrade treatment plants.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The counter-proposal wants to review the preconditions for investment in water and sewerage networks and remove obstacles, since many municipalities cannot manage to upgrade treatment plants. The plan commits to investing in water purification and expansion of advanced water purification and to strengthen joint Baltic work against eutrophication, which presupposes functioning water and sewerage facilities. That the whole country shall function is also a stated starting point in the plan.

Original (Swedish)

Motförslaget vill se över förutsättningarna för investeringar i va-nätet och undanröja hinder, eftersom många kommuner inte klarar att rusta upp reningsverken. Planen åtar sig att satsa på vattenrening och utbyggnad av avancerad vattenrening och att förstärka Östersjöarbetet mot övergödning, vilket förutsätter fungerande va-anläggningar. Att hela landet ska fungera är dessutom en uttalad utgångspunkt i planen.

  • expanded water purificationdecisive»Satsa på forskning om vattenrening samt utbyggnad av avancerad vattenrening« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Invest in research on water purification and expansion of advanced water purification”
  • reduced eutrophication»Förstärka det gemensamma Östersjöarbetet för åtgärder mot övergödning och nedskräpning« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen the joint Baltic work for measures against eutrophication and littering”
  • functioning infrastructure throughout the country»Moderaterna vill ta vara på hela Sveriges möjligheter. Men ska det gå att bo och verka i hela Sverige måste också hela Sverige fungera.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Moderate Party wants to make use of Sweden's opportunities. But for it to be possible to live and work in the whole of Sweden, the whole of Sweden must also function.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

SDSverigedemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan establishes that municipalities must be given increased support and help in environmental work and identifies eutrophication and the situation in the Baltic Sea as serious, with demands for increased pace in restoring the marine environment.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan establishes that municipalities must be given increased support and help in environmental work and identifies eutrophication and the situation in the Baltic Sea as serious, with demands for increased pace in restoring the marine environment. Reviewing the conditions for investments in water and sewerage infrastructure and removing obstacles for municipalities lacking resources to upgrade treatment plants serves both these commitments. The plan also calls for simpler processes in this area.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att kommunerna måste ges ökat stöd och hjälp i miljöarbetet och pekar ut övergödningen och situationen i Östersjön som allvarlig, med krav på ökad takt i återställandet av havsmiljön. Att se över förutsättningarna för investeringar i va-nätet och undanröja hinder för kommuner som saknar ekonomi att rusta reningsverk tjänar båda dessa åtaganden. Planen efterfrågar också enklare processer på området.

  • support for municipalities' environmental workdecisive»Kommunerna måste ges ökat stöd och hjälp i miljöarbetet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Municipalities must be given increased support and help in environmental work.”
  • reduced eutrophication»Situationen vad gäller övergödning och gifter i Östersjön är allvarligt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The situation regarding eutrophication and toxins in the Baltic Sea is serious.”
  • restored marine environment»Öka takten i arbetet med att återställa havsmiljön i Östersjön« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Increase the pace of work to restore the marine environment in the Baltic Sea”
  • simpler processes»Anpassa och förenkla regler och processer för planering och byggnation« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Adapt and simplify rules and processes for planning and construction”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament