2023-04-122022/23:CU12 · p.14CUCivil law & housing

Building permit-exempt measures

Building-permit exemptions and the 'Attefall' rules

What's at stake: The outcome affects how much municipalities can control densification in residential areas and how quickly gaps in the rules can be closed, affecting both developers and neighbours in already built-up areas.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is whether the rules on building-permit exemptions, such as 'Attefall' houses, should be changed to prevent unintended uses, or whether ongoing inquiry work should be awaited before any changes are made.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee points out that a government inquiry has already proposed extensive changes to the rules on permits and notifications, and that the proposals are being processed within the Government Offices, and therefore rejects the motions calling for further rule simplification and measures against abuse of the 'Attefall' rules before that work is complete.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 30 (S)

The reservation wants the government to review how the 'Attefall' rules can be abused, for example when buyers of plots intended for single-family homes apply for permits for houses that can easily be converted into semi-detached homes and then combined with an 'Attefall' house to form a housing cooperative with three times more dwellings than the detailed plan intended, since this can overload roads, water and sewage systems, and school and preschool planning.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 30 by S.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
VNoYes 21/0/0/3departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
Sown reservationNoNo 0/92/0/15follows the planconfidence: lownot addressed
MPNoYes 15/0/0/3departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
CNoAbstain 0/0/21/3departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
LNoYes 14/0/0/2departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
KDNoYes 16/0/0/3departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
MYesYes 59/0/0/9follows the planconfidence: lownot addressed
SDNoYes 64/0/0/9departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed

Committee proposal

Parliament rejects the motions 2022/23:334 by Rickard Nordin (C), 2022/23:439 by Erik Ottoson (M), 2022/23:909 by Alireza Akhondi et al. (C) demands 20 and 30 and 2022/23:2190 by Annie Lööf et al. (C) demand 147.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2022/23:334 av Rickard Nordin (C), 2022/23:439 av Erik Ottoson (M), 2022/23:909 av Alireza Akhondi m.fl. (C) yrkandena 20 och 30 samt 2022/23:2190 av Annie Lööf m.fl. (C) yrkande 147.

Riksdag decision: Parliament said no to 130 proposals in motions from the regular motion period 2022. Among other things with reference to the fact that work is ongoing on several issues. The proposals deal for example with review of the planning and building law, the planning system, permit matters, appeals rules and matters of compensation and supervision.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan requires greater control and planning from society's side over construction, and that societal planning is based on diverse use and people's needs.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan requires greater control and planning from society's side over construction, and that societal planning is based on diverse use and people's needs. That exception rules are used to circumvent detailed plans and overload roads, water/sewage and school planning contradicts that order. A review of how the rules are abused therefore follows from the plan's requirement for societal governance of buildings.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver större kontroll och planering från samhällets sida över byggandet, och att samhällsplaneringen utgår från mångsidig användning och människors behov. Att undantagsregler används för att kringgå detaljplanen och överbelasta vägar, VA och skolplanering strider mot den ordningen. En översyn av hur reglerna missbrukas följer därför av planens krav på samhällelig styrning av bebyggelsen.

  • societal governance of constructiondecisive»Med större kontroll och planering från samhällets sida, kan byggandet både öka i takt och bli miljösmart och lagra kol istället för att släppa ut koldioxid.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“With greater control and planning from society's side, construction can both increase at the same pace and become environmentally smart and store carbon instead of releasing carbon dioxide.”
  • needs-driven societal planning»Samhällsplanering, byggande och upprustning ska inriktas på mångsidig användning och behoven hos olika människor.« (party programme ↗)“Societal planning, construction and renovation should be aimed at diverse use and the needs of different people.”
  • complete districts with services»Områden och stadsdelar ska byggas mer kompletta med service och arbetsplatser så att stadens alltmer hierarkiska uppbyggnad motverkas.« (party programme ↗)“Districts and city areas should be built more complete with services and workplaces so that the city's increasingly hierarchical structure is counteracted.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

SSocialdemokraternaNoNofollows the plannot addressed

The party programme requires future-focused urban planning and makes housing provision a social responsibility, which presupposes that planning for schools, roads and water/sewerage holds together.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The party programme requires future-focused urban planning and makes housing provision a social responsibility, which presupposes that planning for schools, roads and water/sewerage holds together. To review how the exemptions for smaller buildings circumvent the detailed plan is therefore in the plan's direction. However, the question is not addressed in the documents and the conclusion is derived.

Original (Swedish)

Partiprogrammet kräver ett framtidsinriktat stadsbyggande och gör bostadsförsörjningen till ett samhälleligt ansvar, vilket förutsätter att planeringen av skola, vägar och VA håller ihop. Att se över hur undantagsreglerna för mindre byggnader kringgår detaljplanen ligger därför i planens riktning. Frågan är dock inte behandlad i dokumenten och slutsatsen är härledd.

  • planned urban developmentdecisive»framtidsinriktat stadsbyggande som skapar integrerade, variationsrika och transportsnåla« (party programme ↗)“future-focused urban planning that creates integrated, diverse and transport-efficient”
  • social housing responsibility»Därför anser vi att det är ett samhälleligt ansvar att trygga« (party programme ↗)“Therefore, we believe it is a social responsibility to secure”
  • combat overcrowding»Boende- och upplåtelseformer ska vara blandade. Trångboddheten ska bekämpas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Housing and tenure forms should be mixed. Overcrowding should be combated.”
MPMiljöpartietNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan says nothing about building permits that are exempt from application procedures, but requires that urban planning be permeated by a holistic view and that housing be built coordinated with services, childcare and schools.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan says nothing about building permits that are exempt from application procedures, but requires that urban planning be permeated by a holistic view and that housing be built coordinated with services, childcare and schools. A circumvention of the detailed plan that overburdens roads, water/sanitation and school planning contradicts that holistic view, so a review of exemption rules receives support. The conclusion is derived and uncertain.

Original (Swedish)

Planen säger inget om bygglovsbefriade åtgärder, men kräver att stadsplaneringen genomsyras av en helhetssyn och att bostäder byggs samordnat med service, förskolor och skolor. Ett kringgående av detaljplanen som överbelastar vägar, VA och skolplanering strider mot den helhetssynen, varför en översyn av undantagsreglerna får stöd. Slutsatsen är härledd och osäker.

  • holistic view in planningdecisive»Stadsplaneringen ska genomsyras av en helhetssyn som sätter människans och miljöns långsiktiga välmående i centrum.« (party programme ↗)“Urban planning should be permeated by a holistic view that puts the wellbeing of people and the environment in the long term at the center.”
  • coordinated development planning»Bostäder ska byggas där kollektivtrafiken är väl utbyggd och blandas med arbetsplatser, rekreationsområden, idrott, service, kultur, förskolor och skolor.« (party programme ↗)“Housing should be built where public transport is well expanded and mixed with workplaces, recreation areas, sports, services, culture, childcare and schools.”
  • long-term society planning»Långsiktighet är inte bara ett synsätt inom miljöpolitiken utan även avgörande när det gäller samhällsplanering och ekonomisk politik.« (party programme ↗)“Long-term thinking is not just an approach within environmental policy but also crucial when it comes to society planning and economic policy.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

CCenterpartietNoAbstaindeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan promises that basic public services, roads, water and school shall function throughout the country, which suggests that exceptions that in practice bypass the detailed plan and overload local infrastructure should be reviewed.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan promises that basic public services, roads, water and school shall function throughout the country, which suggests that exceptions that in practice bypass the detailed plan and overload local infrastructure should be reviewed. At the same time, regulatory simplification for construction is a core commitment, which limits how far a tightening should go. The plan does not address exemptions from building permit requirements at all, so the position is uncertain.

Original (Swedish)

Planen lovar att grundläggande samhällsservice, vägar, vatten och skola ska fungera i hela landet, vilket talar för att undantagsregler som i praktiken kringgår detaljplanen och överbelastar den lokala infrastrukturen bör ses över. Samtidigt är regelförenkling för byggande ett bärande åtagande, vilket begränsar hur långt en skärpning bör gå. Planen behandlar inte de bygglovsbefriade åtgärderna alls, så ställningstagandet är osäkert.

  • functioning public servicesdecisive»Det offentliga ska garantera att en sådan grundläggande samhällsservice finns, i hela landet,« (party programme ↗)“The public must guarantee that such basic public services exist, throughout the country,”
  • housing construction throughout the country»En förutsättning för utveckling är att det finns tillräckligt med bostäder i hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“A prerequisite for development is that there are enough housing throughout the country.”
  • regulatory simplification as counterweight»Vi ska rensa upp bland överflödiga regler och byråkrati.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We shall clean up unnecessary rules and bureaucracy.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

LLiberalernaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan wants rules that make it easy to do the right thing and that municipal planning actually controls how areas are built, with functioning roads and public services.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants rules that make it easy to do the right thing and that municipal planning actually controls how areas are built, with functioning roads and public services. That exemption rules are used to bypass the detailed plan and overload infrastructure conflicts with that, which argues for a review. The plan's strong simplification agenda concerns the rules themselves, not the right to bypass them.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill ha spelregler som gör det lätt att göra rätt och att den kommunala planeringen faktiskt styr hur områden byggs, med fungerande vägar och samhällsservice. Att undantagsregler används för att kringgå detaljplanen och överbelasta infrastrukturen strider mot det, vilket talar för en översyn. Planens starka förenklingsagenda gäller reglerna som sådana, inte rätten att kringgå dem.

  • clear rulesdecisive»Vi vill ha spelregler som gör det lätt att göra rätt« (party programme ↗)“We want rules that make it easy to do the right thing”
  • municipal planning controls»I samhällsplaneringen ska det kommunala planmonopolet användas i högre grad« (party programme ↗)“In societal planning, the municipal planning monopoly should be used to a greater degree”
  • simplified building regulations»korta överklagandeprocesserna och fortsätta förenkla byggreglerna« (2022 manifesto ↗)“shorten appeal processes and continue to simplify building regulations”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

KDKristdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan requires that impact assessments be made before planning decisions and describes how different parts of society are affected, because housing and community planning affect the living environment for a long time.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan requires that impact assessments be made before planning decisions and describes how different parts of society are affected, because housing and community planning affect the living environment for a long time. The municipalities have social responsibility for housing supply and therefore need to be able to plan schools, roads and utilities. A review of how exemption rules for smaller buildings are misused follows from that, while the plan warns against unnecessary rules.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver att konsekvensbeskrivningar görs inför planbeslut och beskriver hur olika delar av samhället påverkas, eftersom bostäder och samhällsplanering påverkar livsmiljön under lång tid. Kommunerna har det sociala ansvaret för bostadsförsörjningen och behöver därför kunna planera skola, vägar och VA. En översyn av hur undantagsreglerna för mindre byggnader missbrukas följer av det, samtidigt som planen varnar för onödiga regler.

  • impact assessment before planning decisionsdecisive»Inför planbeslut ska konsekvensbeskrivningar göras, som beskriver hur olika delar av samhället påverkas.« (party programme ↗)“Before planning decisions, impact assessments shall be made, describing how different parts of society are affected.”
  • planning's long-term effects»Bostäder och samhällsplanering påverkar i hög« (party programme ↗)“Housing and community planning affect the”
  • municipal planning responsibility»Kommunerna ska ha det sociala ansvaret för att« (party programme ↗)“Municipalities shall have social responsibility for”
  • no unnecessary rules»och onödiga regler får inte stå i vägen för en kommun« (party programme ↗)“and unnecessary rules shall not stand in the way of a municipality”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MModeraternaYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The plan does not address misuse of exemption rules for minor buildings.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan does not address misuse of exemption rules for minor buildings. Its closest commitments go in the opposite direction: simpler building plans, significantly reduced regulatory red tape and more housing in a country with housing shortage in 207 municipalities. A review pointing towards tightened limits on building permit-exempt measures therefore lies outside the plan's line.

Original (Swedish)

Planen behandlar inte missbruk av undantagsreglerna för mindre byggnader. Dess närmast liggande åtaganden går i motsatt riktning: enklare byggplaner, kraftigt minskat regelkrångel och fler bostäder i ett land med bostadsbrist i 207 kommuner. En översyn som pekar mot skärpta begränsningar av bygglovsbefriade åtgärder ligger därför utanför planens linje.

  • simpler planning systemdecisive»Ersätta avancerade detaljplaner med enklare byggplaner« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Replace complex detailed plans with simpler building plans”
  • reduced red tape»Ta bort en tredjedel av företagens administrationskostnader och en tredjedel av regelkrånglet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Remove a third of businesses' administrative costs and a third of regulatory red tape”
  • housing shortage to be built away»Det är bostadsbrist i 207 av landets 290 kommuner.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“There is housing shortage in 207 of the country's 290 municipalities.”
SDSverigedemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan emphasises that mistakes from the Million Programme must not be repeated when new residential areas are established and points to overcrowding as a serious problem, which speaks for reviewing how exemption rules can be abused so that areas become overloaded.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan emphasises that mistakes from the Million Programme must not be repeated when new residential areas are established and points to overcrowding as a serious problem, which speaks for reviewing how exemption rules can be abused so that areas become overloaded. At the same time, the plan wants to simplify building regulations, which points in the opposite direction; the requirement, however, concerns abuse, not stricter requirements for legitimate construction. Certainty is therefore low.

Original (Swedish)

Planen betonar att misstagen från miljonprogrammet inte får upprepas när nya bostadsområden etableras och pekar på trångboddhet som ett allvarligt problem, vilket talar för att se över hur undantagsregler kan missbrukas så att områden överbelastas. Samtidigt vill planen förenkla byggreglerna, vilket drar i motsatt riktning; kravet handlar dock om missbruk, inte om skärpta krav på seriöst byggande. Säkerheten är därför låg.

  • avoid new planning mistakesdecisive»Men när nya bostadsområden etableras är det viktigt att misstag som gjordes under miljonprogrammet inte upprepas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“But when new residential areas are established it is important that mistakes made during the Million Programme are not repeated.”
  • prevent overcrowding»Resultatet av de samlade faktorerna har under 2000-talet blivit kraftigt ökade bostadspriser, undanträngningseffekter på hyresmarknaden, utbredd trångboddhet och ökad hemlöshet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The result of the combined factors has been sharply increased housing prices, crowding-out effects in the rental market, widespread overcrowding and increased homelessness over the 2000s.”
  • pleasant residential areas»Sverigedemokraterna vill verka för trivsamma och trygga områden med klassisk arkitektur.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden Democrats want to work for pleasant and safe areas with classical architecture.”
  • simplify the planning process»Anpassa och förenkla regler och processer för planering och byggnation« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Adapt and simplify rules and processes for planning and construction”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament