2024-12-182024/25:FiU5 · p.2FiUEconomy & finance
Questions on European Union budget
Priorities for the electricity grid and energy cooperation in the EU's budget negotiations
What's at stake: A larger share of the EU budget for energy cooperation could speed up grid expansion and support the climate transition both in Sweden and other member states, but the issue is also about how far in advance the Riksdag should steer the government's negotiating line ahead of upcoming budget talks.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether Sweden should actively push, in upcoming negotiations on the EU budget, to double the share of the budget devoted to EU energy cooperation and grid expansion, or whether the government's current way of coordinating priorities with the Riksdag and taking part in ongoing EU work is sufficient.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee notes that the government has already coordinated its priorities in the negotiations on the EU's multiannual budget framework, most recently ahead of the framework's mid-term review, through consultations with the Finance Committee and the EU Affairs Committee, that the government is expected to return to the committee ahead of the next framework negotiation, and that the government has welcomed discussion of sustainable electricity infrastructure at EU meetings; the committee therefore sees no reason to direct a statement to the government and rejects the motion.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 1 (C)
The reserving party (C) wants to double the share of funds in the EU budget devoted to strengthening EU energy cooperation and enabling expansion of the European electricity grid, arguing that the climate transition is one of the greatest challenges of our time and that energy supply in both Sweden and the EU needs to be secured.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by C.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Yes 19/0/0/5 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| S | No | Yes 93/0/0/13 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| MP | No | Yes 14/0/0/4 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| C | No | No 0/21/0/3 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 12/0/0/4 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| KD | No | Yes 16/0/0/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| M | Yes | Yes 60/0/0/8 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| SD | Yes | Yes 63/0/0/9 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects motion 2024/25:2954 by Muharrem Demirok et al. (C) item 38.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motion 2024/25:2954 av Muharrem Demirok m.fl. (C) yrkande 38.
Riksdag decision: Approximately 47.8 billion kronor from the state budget is to go to the EU fee for 2025, the government proposes. The Riksdag said yes to the government's proposal. The Riksdag also said yes to the government being able to enter into the economic commitments that follow from the EU budget 2025. The Riksdag said no to a proposal concerning the EU budget. The proposal was submitted during the general motion period 2024. The Riksdag decides on the state budget in two steps. First, a decision is made on the framework for the 27 expenditure areas in the budget. The Riksdag decided this on 27 November 2024. Subsequently, the Riksdag determines in a second step how the money is to be distributed within each expenditure area. This decision concerns step two in the decision-making process.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to double EU budget resources for energy cooperation and European electricity network expansion. (C) — Reservation 1
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The party programme wants good cooperation between European countries, especially on areas such as climate, environment, energy and transport, and requires a radical expansion of renewable electricity production.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme wants good cooperation between European countries, especially on areas such as climate, environment, energy and transport, and requires a radical expansion of renewable electricity production. Doubling the EU budget's share for energy cooperation and electricity grid expansion is in line with that. At the same time, the plan is critical of more decisions being moved to the EU, which makes the conclusion uncertain.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet vill ett gott samarbete mellan de europeiska länderna, särskilt på områden som klimat, miljö, energi och transporter, och kräver en radikal utbyggnad av den förnybara elproduktionen. Att fördubbla EU-budgetens andel för energisamarbete och elnätsutbyggnad ligger i linje med det. Samtidigt är planen kritisk mot att fler beslut flyttas till EU, vilket gör slutsatsen osäker.
- European energy cooperationdecisive»områden som klimat, miljö, energi, transporter och krishantering.« (party programme ↗)“areas such as climate, environment, energy, transport and crisis management.”
- expanded renewable electricity»En radikal utbyggnad av den förnybara elproduktionen är avgörande« (party programme ↗)“A radical expansion of renewable electricity production is crucial”
- inter-state cooperation»Vi vill se ett tätt samarbete mellan de nordiska länderna och ett gott« (party programme ↗)“We want to see close cooperation between the Nordic countries and a good”
- EU criticism»Vi är däremot kritiska till EU:s odemokratiska struktur« (party programme ↗)“We are, however, critical of the EU's undemocratic structure”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto wishes to at least double the pace of grid expansion and expand electricity production of all kinds, and sees EU cooperation as the foundation for solving the climate question.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto wishes to at least double the pace of grid expansion and expand electricity production of all kinds, and sees EU cooperation as the foundation for solving the climate question. The counter-proposal's demand to double the share of the EU budget going to energy cooperation and European grid expansion is in line with these explicit commitments, as is the party programme's demand for joint financing of environmental investments. However, the plan does not state a position on the shares of the EU budget.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet vill minst fördubbla takten i utbyggnaden av elnätet och bygga ut elproduktionen av alla slag, och ser EU-samarbetet som grunden för att lösa klimatfrågan. Motförslagets krav att fördubbla den andel av EU-budgeten som går till energisamarbete och europeisk elnätsutbyggnad ligger i linje med dessa åtaganden, liksom med partiprogrammets krav på gemensam finansiering av miljöinvesteringar. Planen uttalar sig dock inte om EU-budgetens andelar.
- doubled grid expansiondecisive»Vi vill minst fördubbla takten i utbyggnaden av elnätet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We wish to at least double the pace of grid expansion.”
- EU solves common problems»Vi är övertygade om att EU-samarbetet är grunden för att lösa många av vår tids svåraste problem.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We are convinced that EU cooperation is the foundation for solving many of our time's most difficult problems.”
- joint financing of environmental investments»koldioxidbeskattningen och gemensam finansiering av miljöinvesteringar hör dit.« (party programme ↗)“carbon taxation and joint financing of environmental investments belong there.”
- expanded electricity production»Bygg ut elproduktionen av alla slag.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Expand electricity production of all kinds.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wants to redirect the EU budget from nuclear power, motorways and fossil-dependent agriculture toward sustainable infrastructure and renewable energy, and demands expanded electricity grids, energy storage and a smart energy system at home.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to redirect the EU budget from nuclear power, motorways and fossil-dependent agriculture toward sustainable infrastructure and renewable energy, and demands expanded electricity grids, energy storage and a smart energy system at home. Doubling the budget share for energy cooperation and European grid expansion thus lies in the plan's direction. The election manifesto furthermore links reduced energy import dependency directly to the invasion of Ukraine.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill styra om EU-budgeten från kärnkraft, motorvägar och fossilberoende jordbruk till hållbar infrastruktur och förnybar energi, och kräver på hemmaplan utbyggda elnät, energilager och ett smart energisystem. Att fördubbla budgetandelen för energisamarbete och europeisk elnätsutbyggnad ligger därmed i planens riktning. Valmanifestet knyter dessutom minskat importberoende av energi direkt till invasionen av Ukraina.
- redirected EU budgetdecisive»Det är inte rimligt att EU lägger stora resurser på fossil- och kemikalieberoende jordbruk, kärnkraft och motorvägsbyggen i ekonomiskt starka delar av EU, medan ekologiskt jordbruk, hållbar infrastruktur och förnybar energi får stryka på foten.« (party programme ↗)“It is not reasonable that the EU allocates large resources to fossil- and chemical-dependent agriculture, nuclear power and motorway construction in economically strong parts of the EU, while organic agriculture, sustainable infrastructure and renewable energy are left behind.”
- expanded electricity grids»bygga ut elnäten, investera i energilager och satsa på ett smart energisystem.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“expand the electricity grids, invest in energy storage and pursue a smart energy system.”
- reduced energy dependency»Putins invasion av Ukraina visar tydligt hur viktigt det är att Sverige och EU blir mindre beroende av att importera energi.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Putin's invasion of Ukraine clearly shows how important it is for Sweden and the EU to become less dependent on importing energy.”
- climate-conditional budget»Budgeten måste utformas så att den inte går till åtgärder som skadar klimatet.« (party programme ↗)“The budget must be designed so that it does not go toward measures that harm the climate.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The party programme wants EU's common policy to become more powerful precisely in the area of climate transition, and the election manifesto commits that Sweden shall become Europe's green battery and that the electricity grid shall be strengthened and expanded.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme wants EU's common policy to become more powerful precisely in the area of climate transition, and the election manifesto commits that Sweden shall become Europe's green battery and that the electricity grid shall be strengthened and expanded. The counter-proposal's demand for a doubled share of the EU budget for energy cooperation and European electricity grid expansion is in line with these commitments. However, the plan does not specify budget shares.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet vill att EU:s gemensamma politik blir kraftfullare just på klimatomställningens område, och valmanifestet åtar sig att Sverige ska bli Europas gröna batteri och att elnätet ska rustas och byggas ut. Motförslagets krav på en fördubblad andel av EU-budgeten för energisamarbete och europeisk elnätsutbyggnad ligger i linje med dessa åtaganden. Planen anger dock inga budgetandelar.
- more powerful EU climate policydecisive»På områden som klimatomställningen, frihandeln och den gränsöverskridande brottsligheten bör den gemensamma politiken bli kraftfullare« (party programme ↗)“On areas such as climate transition, free trade and cross-border crime, the common policy should become more powerful”
- green electricity export and expanded electricity grid»Sverige ska bli Europas gröna batteri och exportera el till grannländer som fasar ut sitt fossilberoende. Vi vill fördubbla produktionen av utsläppsfri el, och rusta och bygga ut elnätet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden shall become Europe's green battery and export electricity to neighbouring countries that phase out their fossil dependency. We want to double the production of emission-free electricity, and strengthen and expand the electricity grid.”
- strengthened energy independence»Sveriges energioberoende måste stärkas, bland annat genom att mångdubbla produktionen av biobränslen och biogas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden's energy independence must be strengthened, including by many-fold increasing the production of biofuels and biogas.”
- more ambitious EU climate tools»EU:s system för handel med utsläppsrätter är bland de mest effektiva verktyg vi har, och vi vill göra det ännu mer ambitiöst och öppna upp det för fler länder som vill ansluta sig.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The EU's emissions trading system is among the most effective tools we have, and we want to make it even more ambitious and open it up to more countries that want to join.”
The party programme establishes that the EU's common energy policy should be developed, among other things for security policy reasons, and the election manifesto wants to invest in the power system and see the EU as the world's most important environmental organization.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme establishes that the EU's common energy policy should be developed, among other things for security policy reasons, and the election manifesto wants to invest in the power system and see the EU as the world's most important environmental organization. Increasing the share of the EU budget that goes to energy cooperation and expanded European power grid therefore aligns with the plan, which is also prepared to reprioritize in the EU budget by phasing out agricultural direct support. However, the plan does not specify a budget share, which is why the support is derived.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår fast att EU:s gemensamma energipolitik ska utvecklas, bland annat av säkerhetspolitiska skäl, och valmanifestet vill investera i kraftsystemet och se EU som världens viktigaste miljöorganisation. Att öka den andel av EU-budgeten som går till energisamarbete och utbyggt europeiskt elnät ligger därför i linje med planen, som också är beredd att omprioritera i EU-budgeten genom att avveckla jordbrukets direktstöd. Planen anger dock ingen budgetandel, varför stödet är härlett.
- developed EU energy policydecisive»EU:s gemensamma energipolitik ska utvecklas.« (party programme ↗)“The EU's common energy policy shall be developed.”
- investments in the power system»Ska vi få ner elpriserna krävs att vi bygger inte bara kärnkraft utan också mer sol- och vindkraft i hela landet, investerar i kraftsystemet och satsar på energilagring.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“To get electricity prices down, we need to build not just nuclear power but also more solar and wind power throughout the country, invest in the power system, and invest in energy storage.”
- EU as climate actor»EU är världens viktigaste miljöorganisation – det är bara genom samarbete i Europa och globalt som klimatutmaningen kan mötas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The EU is the world's most important environmental organization – it is only through cooperation in Europe and globally that the climate challenge can be met.”
- reprioritization in EU budget»Direktstöden till jordbruket ska avvecklas« (party programme ↗)“Direct support for agriculture shall be phased out”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan requires increased coordination of energy policy at the EU level and states that supply security is a cross-border challenge that requires joint measures.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires increased coordination of energy policy at the EU level and states that supply security is a cross-border challenge that requires joint measures. It also wishes to secure energy supply in the long term and sees an open international energy market as a benefit for customers, which presupposes expanded transmission capacity. Increasing the EU budget's share for energy cooperation and electricity networks thus lies in line with the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver en ökad samordning av energipolitiken på EU-nivå och konstaterar att försörjningstryggheten är en gränsöverskridande utmaning som kräver gemensamma åtgärder. Den vill också trygga energiförsörjningen långsiktigt och ser en öppen internationell energimarknad som en fördel för kunderna, vilket förutsätter utbyggd överföringskapacitet. Att öka EU-budgetens andel för energisamarbete och elnät ligger därmed i planens linje.
- increased energy coordination in EUdecisive»Det krävs en ökad samordning av energipolitiken på« (party programme ↗)“There is a need for increased coordination of energy policy at”
- cross-border supply security»Även försörjningstryggheten utgör en gränsöverskridande utmaning. Gemensamma åtgärder för bättre energihushållning krävs.« (party programme ↗)“Supply security also constitutes a cross-border challenge. Joint measures for better energy management are required.”
- open international energy market»En öppen och internationell energimarknad med ökad konkurrens är till nytta för kunderna.« (party programme ↗)“An open and international energy market with increased competition is beneficial for customers.”
- secure long-term energy supply»Sveriges energiförsörjning ska tryggas genom en långsiktig energipolitik med fasta spelregler« (party programme ↗)“Sweden's energy supply shall be secured through a long-term energy policy with fixed rules”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan's answer to the energy question is new nuclear power and investments in the Swedish electricity network with shorter permit processes, not a larger joint EU budget for grid expansion.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's answer to the energy question is new nuclear power and investments in the Swedish electricity network with shorter permit processes, not a larger joint EU budget for grid expansion. The plan also establishes that the EU should neither do nor decide everything and that decisions should be made at the lowest possible level, which speaks against doubling the EU budget's energy share. The documents do not comment on the distribution of the budget framework, which is why the conclusion is derived.
Original (Swedish)
Planens svar på energifrågan är ny kärnkraft och investeringar i det svenska elnätet med kortare tillståndsprocesser, inte en större gemensam EU-budget för elnätsutbyggnad. Planen slår dessutom fast att EU varken ska göra eller besluta om allt och att beslut ska fattas på lägsta möjliga nivå, vilket talar mot att fördubbla EU-budgetens energiandel. Dokumenten uttalar sig inte om budgetramens fördelning, varför slutsatsen är härledd.
- nuclear power is the energy solutiondecisive»Ny kärnkraft är lösningen för att reparera Sveriges energisystem på lång sikt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“New nuclear power is the solution to repair Sweden's energy system in the long term.”
- limited EU competence»Moderaternas syn på EU speglar vår syn på statens uppgifter: EU ska varken göra eller fatta beslut om allt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Moderates' view of the EU reflects our view of the state's tasks: the EU should neither do nor decide everything.”
- national grid expansion»Investera i det svenska elnätet och korta tillståndsprocesserna för elnätsutbyggnad« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Invest in the Swedish electricity network and shorten permit processes for grid expansion”
- subsidiarity»Beslut ska fattas på lägsta möjliga nivå, så nära medborgarna som möjligt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Decisions must be made at the lowest possible level, as close to citizens as possible.”
The plan's EU line is to significantly reduce Sweden's EU contribution and to stop transfers of power and EU taxes, and it particularly points out EU funds as prestige projects that are prioritized over citizen benefit.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's EU line is to significantly reduce Sweden's EU contribution and to stop transfers of power and EU taxes, and it particularly points out EU funds as prestige projects that are prioritized over citizen benefit. To double the proportion of the EU budget that goes to energy cooperation and European grid expansion therefore goes against the plan. The plan certainly wants to expand the grid, but through more efficient Swedish permission processes rather than through the EU budget.
Original (Swedish)
Planens EU-linje är att kraftigt minska Sveriges EU-avgift och att stoppa maktöverföringar och EU-skatter, och den pekar särskilt ut EU-fonder som prestigeprojekt som prioriteras före medborgarnyttan. Att fördubbla den andel av EU-budgeten som går till energisamarbete och europeisk elnätsutbyggnad går därför emot planen. Planen vill förvisso bygga ut elnätet, men genom effektivare svenska tillståndsprocesser snarare än via EU-budgeten.
- reduced EU contributiondecisive»Kraftigt minska Sveriges EU-avgift« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Significantly reduce Sweden's EU contribution”
- no more EU funds»Stoppa maktöverföringar och EU-skatter« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Stop transfers of power and EU taxes”
- criticism of EU funds»Antalet myndigheter blir ständigt fler och politiska prestigeprojekt, som höghastighetståg och EU-fonder, prioriteras före medborgarnyttan.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The number of agencies keeps growing and political prestige projects, such as high-speed railways and EU funds, are prioritized before citizen benefit.”
- national grid expansion»Effektivisera och öka förutsägbarheten i tillståndsprocesserna för gruvnäring, elnätsutbyggnad och industri« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Make more efficient and increase predictability in permission processes for mining, grid expansion, and industry”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2024/25:FiU5)
- Committee report full text (HC01FiU5)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2024/25:2954 — En folkrörelse för klimatet av Muharrem Demirok m.fl. (C)
- Proposition 2024/25:1 — Budgetpropositionen för 2025
Source: The Swedish Parliament