2026-03-112025/26:KU26 · p.1KUConstitution
Information exchange between public authorities and municipalities
Review of secrecy legislation for information-sharing between authorities
What's at stake: Secrecy rules can prevent authorities from sharing information to detect fraud and crime against the welfare systems. The issue concerns the balance between protecting individuals' data and enabling authorities to cooperate against crime.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The motions called for a review of secrecy legislation to facilitate information-sharing between authorities in the effort against welfare fraud, while the committee held that ongoing inquiry and preparatory work already addresses the issue.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee rejects the motions, pointing to measures already taken against incorrect payments, including secrecy-breaking legislative amendments and the establishment of the Payments Authority, as well as several ongoing inquiries and preparatory work on information-sharing between authorities.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 1 (S)
The reserving party (S) wants a thorough review of secrecy legislation to strengthen authorities' ability to cooperate and share information in the effort against welfare fraud and labour-market crime.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by S.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have gone the other way
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: KDKristdemokraterna, LLiberalerna, MModeraterna, MPMiljöpartiet
Ja 204–90Nej 105–190
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | Yes | Yes 18/0/0/4 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| S | No | No 0/89/0/17 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
| MP | No | Yes 14/0/1/3 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| C | Yes | Yes 21/0/0/3 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 13/0/0/3 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| KD | No | Yes 16/0/0/3 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| M | No | Yes 56/0/0/12 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| SD | No | Yes 62/0/0/9 | differs | confidence: high | not addressed |
Broke with the party line
| MPAnnika Hirvonen (MP, Stockholms län) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2025/26:3560 by Mikael Damberg et al. (S) motion 9 and 2025/26:3652 by Aylin Nouri et al. (S) motion 17.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2025/26:3560 av Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S) yrkande 9 och 2025/26:3652 av Aylin Nouri m.fl. (S) yrkande 17.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected 15 proposals on transparency, confidentiality and privacy. The motions were submitted during the general motion period in 2025 and concern, among other things, information exchange between public authorities and municipalities, protection of sensitive personal data and document transparency in activities financed by public funds. The Riksdag refers, among other things, to the fact that work is ongoing in the areas that the motion proposers raise.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to conduct a comprehensive review of secrecy legislation to strengthen cooperation between authorities and municipalities. (S) — Reservation 1
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan's crucial position is that welfare fraud is not best fought through additional control, but by removing the profit motive from welfare, and it criticises that an ever-larger part of tax revenue goes to administration and control.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's crucial position is that welfare fraud is not best fought through additional control, but by removing the profit motive from welfare, and it criticises that an ever-larger part of tax revenue goes to administration and control. At the same time the plan establishes that all have the right to protection of their personal integrity. A comprehensive loosening of confidentiality between public authorities therefore goes against the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planens avgörande hållning är att välfärdsbrott inte bekämpas bäst genom ytterligare kontroll, utan genom att ta bort vinstintresset ur välfärden, och den kritiserar att en allt större del av skattemedlen går till administration och kontroll. Samtidigt slår planen fast att alla har rätt till skydd av sin personliga integritet. En genomgripande uppluckring av sekretessen mellan myndigheter går därför emot planen.
- profit ban before controldecisive»Välfärdsbrott bekämpas inte bäst genom ytterligare tandlös kontroll.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Welfare fraud is not best fought through additional toothless control.”
- protection of personal integrity»har rätt till skydd av sin personliga integritet.« (party programme ↗)“have the right to protection of their personal integrity.”
- reduce control bureaucracy»en allt större del av våra skattemedel går till administration och kontroll« (2022 manifesto ↗)“an ever-larger part of our tax revenue goes to administration and control”
- total ban on profit in welfare»Vänsterpartiet vill införa ett totalförbud mot alla vinstdrivande verksamhetsformer inom välfärden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Left Party wants to introduce a total ban on all profit-driven forms of operation within welfare.”
The election manifesto explicitly establishes that secrecy barriers between authorities shall be removed so that police and other professions can do their job, which is exactly what the counter-proposal asks for in the form of a review of secrecy legislation.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto explicitly establishes that secrecy barriers between authorities shall be removed so that police and other professions can do their job, which is exactly what the counter-proposal asks for in the form of a review of secrecy legislation. The plan also requires that welfare crime and money laundering be stopped and strong measures against workplace crime. The counter-proposal's requirement thus directly aligns with the plan's commitments.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet slår uttryckligen fast att sekretesshinder mellan myndigheter ska rivas så att polisen och andra yrkesgrupper kan göra sitt jobb, vilket är precis vad motförslaget begär i form av en översyn av sekretesslagstiftningen. Planen kräver dessutom att välfärdsbrottslighet och penningtvätt stoppas och krafttag mot arbetslivskriminaliteten. Motförslagets krav ligger därmed direkt i linje med planens åtaganden.
- removed secrecy barriersdecisive»Sekretesshinder mellan myndigheter ska rivas så att polisen och andra yrkesgrupper kan göra sitt jobb.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Secrecy barriers between authorities shall be removed so that police and other professions can do their job.”
- stopped welfare crime»Skattefusk, välfärdsbrottslighet och penningtvätt ska stoppas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Tax fraud, welfare crime and money laundering shall be stopped.”
- strong measures against workplace crime»Krafttag mot arbetslivskriminaliteten.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strong measures against workplace crime.”
- combated economic crime»Bekämpande av bedrägerier och all annan ekonomisk brottslighet.« (party programme ↗)“Combat of fraud and all other economic crime.”
The party programme explicitly requires that cooperation and information sharing between public agencies to stop welfare fraud and organized economic crime shall be strengthened, and the election manifesto wants to ease secrecy between agencies.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme explicitly requires that cooperation and information sharing between public agencies to stop welfare fraud and organized economic crime shall be strengthened, and the election manifesto wants to ease secrecy between agencies. That is precisely what the counter-proposal's review of secrecy legislation aims at. The plan at the same time protects privacy, but that does not speak against a review.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet kräver uttryckligen att samarbetet och informationsdelningen mellan myndigheter för att stoppa välfärdsbrott och organiserad ekonomisk brottslighet ska förstärkas, och valmanifestet vill lätta på sekretessen mellan myndigheter. Det är precis vad motförslagets översyn av sekretesslagstiftningen syftar till. Planen förutsätter samtidigt att integriteten värnas, men det talar inte emot en översyn.
- strengthened information sharingdecisive»informationsdelningen mellan myndigheter för att stoppa penningtvätt, välfärdsbrott och« (party programme ↗)“information sharing between public agencies to stop money laundering, welfare fraud and”
- ease secrecy»lätta på sekretessen mellan områdespoliser, skola, socialtjänst och stärka samarbetet med civilsamhälle« (2022 manifesto ↗)“ease secrecy between area police, schools, social services and strengthen cooperation with civil society”
- prioritize welfare fraud»återföras till samhället. Välfärdsbrott – där gemensamma resurser utnyttjas och« (party programme ↗)“be returned to society. Welfare fraud – where joint resources are exploited and”
- privacy should be weighed in»Staten har ansvar både för att skydda människor från brott och för att respektera« (party programme ↗)“The state has a responsibility both to protect people from crime and to respect”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The party programme requires that all legislation be tested against its impact on personal privacy and that there be proportionality between the restriction and the purpose.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme requires that all legislation be tested against its impact on personal privacy and that there be proportionality between the restriction and the purpose. A comprehensive review that generally broadens information sharing between agencies goes in the opposite direction. That tax funds should be used correctly is indeed a commitment, but it does not outweigh privacy protection. The plan therefore rejects the counter-proposal's demand.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet kräver att all lagstiftning prövas mot sin påverkan på den personliga integriteten och att det finns proportionalitet mellan inskränkningen och syftet. En genomgripande översyn som generellt vidgar informationsdelningen mellan myndigheter går i motsatt riktning. Att skattemedel ska användas rätt är visserligen ett åtagande, men det väger inte över integritetsskyddet. Planen avvisar därför motförslagets krav.
- privacy review of legislationweak support»All lagstiftning bör prövas mot dess påverkan på människors personliga integritet.« (party programme ↗)“All legislation should be tested against its impact on people's personal privacy.”
- proportionality requirementdecisive»Det måste finnas en proportionalitet mellan lagstiftningens inskränkning av medborgarnas integritet och lagarnas syfte.« (party programme ↗)“There must be proportionality between the legislation's restriction of citizens' privacy and the purpose of the laws.”
- strong privacy protection»Ett starkt integritetsskydd är därför en omistlig del av ett öppet och demokratiskt samhälle.« (party programme ↗)“Strong privacy protection is therefore an indispensable part of an open and democratic society.”
- steward tax funds»Mer pengar ska läggas på välfärdens kärna, mindre på bidrag.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“More money should be spent on the core of welfare, less on benefits.”
flags: citat_svagt
The plan establishes that police and social services, as a general rule, should always be able to exchange information, and that effective crime prevention work requires that authorities can effectively share information with each other.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that police and social services, as a general rule, should always be able to exchange information, and that effective crime prevention work requires that authorities can effectively share information with each other. A comprehensive review of confidentiality legislation is the tool required for this. The plan simultaneously requires that new legislative proposals be analyzed from an integrity perspective.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att polis och socialtjänst som huvudregel alltid ska kunna utbyta information och att ett effektivt brottsförebyggande arbete förutsätter att myndigheter effektivt kan dela information med varandra. En genomgripande översyn av sekretesslagstiftningen är det redskap som krävs för detta. Planen kräver samtidigt att nya lagförslag analyseras ur integritetssynpunkt.
- information sharing between authoritiesdecisive»Polis och socialtjänst ska som huvudregel alltid kunna utbyta information sinsemellan och ska oftare dela lokaler.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Police and social services should, as a general rule, always be able to exchange information among themselves and should more often share facilities.”
- effective information sharing»förutsätter att myndigheter effektivt kan dela information med varandra.« (party programme ↗)“requires that authorities can effectively share information with each other.”
- reporting obligation in schools»För att polis och socialtjänst alltid ska få kännedom om barn som är på fel väg i livet ska huvudregeln bli att skolan alltid gör polisanmälan och orosanmälan vid misstänkt brottslighet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“For police and social services to always be informed about children who are on the wrong path in life, the general rule should become that schools always file police reports and reports of concern in case of suspected criminal activity.”
- integrity review»Alla nya lagförslag ska analyseras ur integritetssynpunkt.« (party programme ↗)“All new legislative proposals shall be analyzed from an integrity perspective.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The election manifesto contains an explicit commitment to a complete review of secrecy rules so that authorities can share information between them to prevent and solve crimes.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto contains an explicit commitment to a complete review of secrecy rules so that authorities can share information between them to prevent and solve crimes. The party programme also states that the secrecy option shall be used restrictively and that all crimes shall be prosecuted. The counter-proposal's demand for a comprehensive review of secrecy legislation for cooperation against welfare crimes is the same thing in substance.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet innehåller ett uttryckligt åtagande om en total översyn av sekretessreglerna så att myndigheter kan dela uppgifter mellan sig för att förebygga och klara upp brott. Partiprogrammet slår dessutom fast att sekretessmöjligheten ska nyttjas restriktivt och att alla brott ska beivras. Motförslagets krav på en genomgripande översyn av sekretesslagstiftningen för samverkan mot välfärdsbrott är samma sak i sak.
- review of secrecy rulesdecisive»Total översyn av sekretessreglerna, så att myndigheter kan dela uppgifter mellan sig för att förebygga och klara upp brott.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Complete review of secrecy rules, so that authorities can share information between them to prevent and solve crimes.”
- restrictive secrecy»Sekretessmöjligheten ska nyttjas restriktivt.« (party programme ↗)“The secrecy option shall be used restrictively.”
- all crime shall be prosecuted»Alla brott ska effektivt och utan undantag beivras« (party programme ↗)“All crimes shall be effectively and without exception prosecuted”
- careful handling of personal data»offentliga måste tillämpa stor försiktighet och respekt för den personliga integriteten vid« (party programme ↗)“public must apply great caution and respect for personal integrity when”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan commits to removing all secrecy barriers between social services and police and to halving benefit fraud, citing the billions that disappear each year into the pockets of cheaters and criminals.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan commits to removing all secrecy barriers between social services and police and to halving benefit fraud, citing the billions that disappear each year into the pockets of cheaters and criminals. A comprehensive review of secrecy legislation to enable information sharing against welfare fraud is the same measure in broader form. The plan also expands the authorities' control capacity through a national census and a benefit fraud unit.
Original (Swedish)
Planen åtar sig att undanröja alla sekretesshinder mellan socialtjänst och polis och att halvera bidragsbrotten, med hänvisning till de miljarder som varje år försvinner till fuskare och kriminella. En genomgripande översyn av sekretesslagstiftningen för att möjliggöra informationsdelning mot välfärdsbrott är samma åtgärd i bredare form. Planen bygger dessutom ut myndigheternas kontrollförmåga genom folkräkning och en bidragsbrottsenhet.
- removed secrecy barriersdecisive»• Undanröja alla sekretesshinder mellan socialtjänst och polis« (2022 manifesto ↗)“• Remove all secrecy barriers between social services and police”
- stop welfare fraud(2022 manifesto)
- control over population register»• Genomföra en nationell folkräkning för att stoppa bidragsbrotten« (2022 manifesto ↗)“• Conduct a national census to stop benefit fraud”
- enhanced control capacity»• Inrätta en bidragsbrottsenhet på Försäkringskassan« (2022 manifesto ↗)“• Establish a benefit fraud unit at the Social Insurance Agency”
flags: citat_ej_verifierat
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan's core commitment is that the justice system's cooperation between agencies and tools for detecting and prosecuting criminals shall be improved, and that procedural obstacles to increased prosecution shall be removed.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's core commitment is that the justice system's cooperation between agencies and tools for detecting and prosecuting criminals shall be improved, and that procedural obstacles to increased prosecution shall be removed. A comprehensive review of confidentiality legislation to enable information sharing against welfare fraud is precisely such a measure. The plan also wants to stop welfare crime and stiffen penalties for fraud in welfare systems.
Original (Swedish)
Planens bärande åtagande är att rättsväsendets samverkan mellan myndigheter och verktygen för att upptäcka och lagföra kriminella ska förbättras och att processuella hinder för ökad lagföring ska undanröjas. En genomgripande översyn av sekretesslagstiftningen för att möjliggöra informationsdelning mot välfärdsbrott är precis en sådan åtgärd. Planen vill dessutom stoppa välfärdsbrottsligheten och skärpa straffen för fusk i välfärdssystemen.
- improved agency cooperationdecisive»Rättsväsendets samverkan mellan myndigheter och verktyg för att upptäcka och lagföra kriminella ska förbättras.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The justice system's cooperation between agencies and tools for detecting and prosecuting criminals shall be improved.”
- remove procedural obstacles»Processuella hinder för att möjliggöra en ökad lagföring måste också undanröjas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Procedural obstacles to enable increased prosecution must also be removed.”
- stop welfare crime»Stoppa välfärdsbrottsligheten inom socialförsäkringen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Stop welfare crime within social security”
- tougher stance on benefit fraud»Skärpa straffen för fusk inom välfärdssystemen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Stiffen penalties for fraud in welfare systems”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:KU26)
- Committee report full text (HD01KU26)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:1701 — Kartläggning och löpande uppföljning av offentlighetsprincipen och dess tillämpning av Staffan Eklöf (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:1989 — Offentlighetsprincipen bör gälla SKR av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2790 — Konstitutionella frågor av Jessica Wetterling m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:3078 — Stasiarkiv av Markus Wiechel (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:3401 — Reformerad offentlighetsprincip - skydd för integriteten i ett modernt samhälle av Lars Püss (M)
- Motion 2025/26:3560 — Utgiftsområde 25 Allmänna bidrag till kommuner av Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:3583 — Demokrati och konstitutionella frågor av Muharrem Demirok m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2025/26:3652 — En digital politik som bygger jämlikhet och tillväxt av Aylin Nouri m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:3715 — Ökat skydd för känsliga personuppgifter av Jessica Stegrud (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:3786 — Översyn avseende nya lagars effekter för den enskildes integritet av Magnus Jacobsson (KD)
Source: The Swedish Parliament