2025-05-212024/25:CU19 · p.2CUCivil law & housing
Future form of legislation etc.
Scope of the eased building requirements: should new construction be included?
What's at stake: If the exemptions also cover new construction, more and cheaper student housing can be built faster, but critics warn that newly built units with lower requirements become harder to repurpose later, for example as housing for older people.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the exemptions from accessibility requirements should cover both new construction and conversion of student housing, as the government proposes, or whether the exemptions should be limited to conversions and paired with a broader inquiry into lower rents for students.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee stands by its earlier position that the exemptions should apply to both new construction and alteration of a building, sees no reason to limit the bill to conversions, and considers that the proposed easing already increases the scope for building more small, lower-rent student housing without a separate inquiry being needed; the motions are therefore rejected.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 3 (S)
The reservation (S) wants the government to come back with a new bill limiting the accessibility exemptions to conversions and excluding new construction, arguing that it is willing to test exemptions for conversions because of the constraints that exist in existing buildings, but that newly built housing should be usable for different purposes over many years and that special, restrictive standards for student housing make such future repurposing harder, for instance into housing for older people.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 3 by S.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Abstain 7/0/14/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: high | derived |
| S | No | No 0/93/0/13 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| MP | No | Abstain 0/0/15/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| C | No | Yes 21/0/0/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | derived |
| L | No | Yes 14/0/0/2 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| KD | No | Yes 16/0/0/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| M | Yes | Yes 60/0/0/8 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| SD | Yes | Yes 64/0/0/8 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
Broke with the party line
| VAndreas Lennkvist Manriquez (V, Stockholms kommun) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
| VIda Gabrielsson (V, Stockholms kommun) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
| VJessica Wetterling (V, Västra Götalands läns västra) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
| VKarin Rågsjö (V, Stockholms kommun) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
| VLorena Delgado Varas (V, Stockholms kommun) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
| VMaj Karlsson (V, Göteborgs kommun) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
| VNooshi Dadgostar (V, Stockholms län) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.
Committee proposal
Parliament rejects the motions 2024/25:3367 by Jennie Nilsson et al. (S) point 1 and 2024/25:3386 by Märta Stenevi et al. (MP) point 2.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2024/25:3367 av Jennie Nilsson m.fl. (S) yrkande 1 och 2024/25:3386 av Märta Stenevi m.fl. (MP) yrkande 2.
Riksdag decision: Exceptions will be allowed to the requirements for accessibility and usability in buildings containing student housing. Parliament approved the government's proposed amendments to the Planning and Building Act. Exceptions from the requirements apply to at most 80 percent of either the total number of student housing units in a building or the number of student housing units added to a building when an action is taken. The exception should create conditions for increasing the construction of student housing with lower rent. At least 20 percent of the student housing units must still meet the current requirements for accessibility and usability. A student housing unit covered by the exception must, however, be able to be visited by a person with impaired mobility or orientation ability. The legislative amendments enter into force on July 1, 2025.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants relaxations in building requirements for student housing to apply only to renovations, not new construction. (S) — Reservation 3
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan wants to make all parts of society accessible and sees housing as part of a larger societal development that shall last over a long time.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to make all parts of society accessible and sees housing as part of a larger societal development that shall last over a long time. Limiting exceptions to accessibility requirements to renovations and not applying them to new construction aligns with both commitments. The plan's demands for cheap rental apartments speak for lower housing costs, but not at the cost of locking newly built housing into narrow use.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill göra alla delar av samhället tillgängliga och ser bostäderna som en del av ett större samhällsbygge som ska hålla över lång tid. Att begränsa undantagen från tillgänglighetskraven till ombyggnad och inte låta dem gälla nybyggnad ligger i linje med båda åtagandena. Planens krav på billiga hyresrätter talar för lägre boendekostnader, men inte till priset av att nybyggda bostäder låses fast i en snäv användning.
- accessible societydecisive»och göra alla delar av samhället tillgängliga.« (party programme ↗)“and make all parts of society accessible.”
- housing in a larger societal development»Bostäderna behöver vara en del av ett större samhällsbygge, där vi« (party programme ↗)“Housing needs to be part of a larger societal development, where we”
- lack of accessibility excludes»och anpassning leder fortfarande till fattigdom och utestängning.« (party programme ↗)“and adaptation still leads to poverty and exclusion.”
- rental apartments with reasonable rents»Vi vill prioritera att bygga hyresrätter med rimliga« (party programme ↗)“We want to prioritise building rental apartments with reasonable”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto establishes that people with disabilities shall be able to live their life like others and that it shall be safe to grow old in Sweden.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto establishes that people with disabilities shall be able to live their life like others and that it shall be safe to grow old in Sweden. Newly built apartments exempt from accessibility requirements cannot readily be used for elderly later, which speaks for limiting exemptions to renovations. The party programme sees housing as a social right. The plan therefore supports the counter-proposal's requirement.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet slår fast att personer med funktionsnedsättning ska kunna leva sitt liv som andra och att det ska vara tryggt att åldras i Sverige. Nybyggda bostäder som undantas från tillgänglighetskraven kan inte utan vidare användas för äldre senare, vilket talar för att begränsa undantagen till ombyggnad. Partiprogrammet ser bostaden som en social rättighet. Planen stöder därför motförslagets krav.
- accessibility for people with disabilitiesdecisive»Personer med funktionsnedsättning ska kunna leva sitt liv som andra.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“People with disabilities shall be able to live their life like others.”
- safe aging»Det ska vara tryggt att åldras i Sverige.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It shall be safe to grow old in Sweden.”
- housing as a social right»socialdemokrater ser bostaden som en social rättighet och bostadspolitiken som en del av« (party programme ↗)“social democrats see housing as a social right and housing policy as part of”
- right to own housing»funktionsförmåga, har rätt till arbete, eget boende, full rörelsefrihet och ett aktivt liv.« (party programme ↗)“functional capacity, have the right to work, own housing, full mobility and an active life.”
The party programme establishes that lack of accessibility is a form of discrimination and that construction shall be done resource-efficiently and sustainably, with housing that is demanded by young people, elderly and other groups.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme establishes that lack of accessibility is a form of discrimination and that construction shall be done resource-efficiently and sustainably, with housing that is demanded by young people, elderly and other groups. Allowing exceptions to apply also to new construction locks new buildings into a single use. The plan therefore supports that exceptions are limited to renovation.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår fast att bristande tillgänglighet är en form av diskriminering och att byggnation ska ske resurseffektivt och långsiktigt, med bostäder som efterfrågas av unga, äldre och andra grupper. Att låta undantagen gälla även nybyggnad låser nya hus i en enda användning. Planen stöder därför att undantagen begränsas till ombyggnad.
- inaccessibility is discriminationdecisive»Bristande tillgänglighet är i sig en typ av diskriminering och måste därför bli en ny diskrimineringsgrund.« (party programme ↗)“Lack of accessibility is in itself a type of discrimination and must therefore become a new ground for discrimination.”
- long-term sustainable construction»Byggnation ska ske på ett yteffektivt, resurseffektivt och klimatsmart sätt.« (party programme ↗)“Construction shall be done in an area-efficient, resource-efficient and climate-smart manner.”
- housing for all groups»Vi behöver se till att det byggs bostäder som efterfrågas av unga, studenter, äldre, stora familjer och låginkomsttagare.« (party programme ↗)“We need to ensure that housing is built that is demanded by young people, students, elderly, large families and low-income earners.”
- equal rights»Alla människor, oavsett funktionsnedsättning eller förmågor, ska ha lika rättigheter, möjligheter och skyldigheter.« (party programme ↗)“All people, regardless of disability or abilities, shall have equal rights, opportunities and responsibilities.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wants to create a society with full accessibility and emphasizes that different housing forms are needed so that everyone can be offered safety and good care, especially for a secure old age.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to create a society with full accessibility and emphasizes that different housing forms are needed so that everyone can be offered safety and good care, especially for a secure old age. Letting the exceptions apply also to new construction locks a narrow field of use in housing that shall stand for many decades. Limiting the concessions to renovation therefore lies closer to the plan, even though it simultaneously wants to see more housing built.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill skapa ett samhälle med full tillgänglighet och betonar att olika boendeformer behövs för att alla ska kunna erbjudas trygghet och god omvårdnad, inte minst för en trygg ålderdom. Att låta undantagen gälla även nybyggnad låser fast ett smalt användningsområde i bostäder som ska stå i många decennier. Att begränsa lättnaderna till ombyggnad ligger därför närmare planen, även om den samtidigt vill se fler bostäder byggas.
- full accessibilitydecisive»Tillgängligheten är avgörande för människor med olika funktionsnedsättningar.« (party programme ↗)“Accessibility is crucial for people with different disabilities.”
- secure old age»Alla ska kunna få en trygg ålderdom med hög livskvalitet och värdighet.« (party programme ↗)“Everyone shall be able to have a secure old age with high quality of life and dignity.”
- support for disability»Du som har en funktionsnedsättning ska få det stöd du behöver, och staten ska ta ett större ansvar för att LSS fungerar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“You who have a disability shall receive the support you need, and the state shall take greater responsibility for LSS to function.”
- more housing needed»En förutsättning för utveckling är att det finns tillräckligt med bostäder i hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“A prerequisite for development is that there is sufficient housing throughout the country.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan establishes that Sweden shall be an accessible country, that lack of accessibility shall be seen as discrimination and that a variety of homes adapted for the elderly are needed.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that Sweden shall be an accessible country, that lack of accessibility shall be seen as discrimination and that a variety of homes adapted for the elderly are needed. To let exemptions apply also to new construction locks in homes that cannot be used flexibly over time. To limit the relief to renovation thus comes closer to the plan, despite its desire to simplify building regulations.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att Sverige ska vara ett tillgängligt land, att bristande tillgänglighet ska ses som diskriminering och att det behövs en mångfald av bostäder anpassade för äldre. Att låta undantagen gälla även nybyggnation låser fast bostäder som inte kan användas flexibelt över tid. Att begränsa lättnaderna till ombyggnad ligger därför närmare planen, trots dess vilja att förenkla byggregler.
- lack of accessibility is discriminationdecisive»tillgänglighet ska ses som diskriminering.« (party programme ↗)“lack of accessibility shall be seen as discrimination.”
- homes adapted for the elderly»bostäder anpassade för äldre, både på den vanliga bostadsmarknaden och i form av äldreboenden.« (party programme ↗)“homes adapted for the elderly, both on the regular housing market and in the form of senior residences.”
- accessible society»Sverige ska vara ett tillgängligt land.« (party programme ↗)“Sweden shall be an accessible country.”
- simplified building regulations»Vi vill införa en stimulans för att spara ihop till den första insatsen, slopa det förhöjda amorteringskravet, korta överklagandeprocesserna och fortsätta förenkla byggreglerna.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to introduce an incentive to save for your first deposit, remove the elevated amortization requirement, shorten appeals processes and continue to simplify building regulations.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan states that housing and urban planning affect living environment for a long time and therefore must create lasting values, and that special consideration shall be given to the elderly and people with disabilities.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that housing and urban planning affect living environment for a long time and therefore must create lasting values, and that special consideration shall be given to the elderly and people with disabilities. Permanently building in lower accessibility requirements in new construction locks in the existing stock and makes future conversion to for example elderly housing difficult. Limiting exemptions to renovation thus follows from the plan's stewardship thinking.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att bostäder och samhällsplanering påverkar livsmiljön under lång tid och därför måste skapa bestående värden, och att särskild hänsyn ska tas till äldre och personer med funktionsnedsättning. Att permanent bygga in lägre tillgänglighetskrav i nyproduktion låser fast beståndet och försvårar framtida omställning till exempelvis äldreboende. Att begränsa undantagen till ombyggnad följer därför av planens förvaltarskapstanke.
- lasting values in constructiondecisive»Bostäder och samhällsplanering påverkar i hög grad och under lång tid vår livsmiljö. Därför är det av stor vikt med en arkitektur och stadsplanering som skapar bestående värden och är hållbar i begreppets fulla bemärkelse.« (party programme ↗)“Housing and urban planning significantly affect and for a long time our living environment. Therefore it is of great importance with architecture and urban planning that creates lasting values and is sustainable in the full sense of the term.”
- stewardship in decisions»Alla politiska beslut bör fattas i enlighet med förvaltarskapsprincipen, vilket innebär att konsekvenserna av besluten« (party programme ↗)“All political decisions should be made in accordance with the stewardship principle, which means that the consequences of the decisions”
- consideration in housing planning»Särskild hänsyn måste också tas till äldre och till personer med funktionsnedsättning.« (party programme ↗)“Special consideration must also be given to the elderly and to people with disabilities.”
- mixed housing»i alla stadsdelar och bostadsområden ska finnas varierande upplåtelseformer, för att därigenom få till stånd en naturlig blandning av åldrar och människor med« (party programme ↗)“in all districts and housing areas shall exist varying lease forms, to thereby achieve a natural mix of ages and people with”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wants to increase construction through simpler regulations, including by replacing advanced detailed plans with simpler building plans and removing one-third of regulatory red tape.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to increase construction through simpler regulations, including by replacing advanced detailed plans with simpler building plans and removing one-third of regulatory red tape. Limiting the simplifications to renovation and exempting new construction would greatly reduce their effect on new production. With housing shortages in 207 of 290 municipalities, the plan therefore argues against the counter-proposal's limitation.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill öka byggandet genom enklare regler, bland annat genom att ersätta avancerade detaljplaner med enklare byggplaner och ta bort en tredjedel av regelkrånglet. Att begränsa lättnaderna till ombyggnad och undanta nybyggnad skulle kraftigt minska deras effekt på nyproduktionen. Med bostadsbrist i 207 av 290 kommuner talar planen därför emot motförslagets begränsning.
- simpler building regulationsdecisive»Ersätta avancerade detaljplaner med enklare byggplaner« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Replace advanced detailed plans with simpler building plans”
- more housing shall be built»Vi vill genomföra reformer som ökar byggandet av såväl hyressom bostadsrätter.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to implement reforms that increase the construction of both rental and owner-occupied housing.”
- acute housing shortage»Det är bostadsbrist i 207 av landets 290 kommuner.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“There is a housing shortage in 207 of the country's 290 municipalities.”
- reduced regulatory red tape»Ta bort en tredjedel av företagens administrationskostnader och en tredjedel av regelkrånglet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Remove one-third of companies' administrative costs and one-third of regulatory red tape”
flags: citat_migrerat
The election manifesto wants to increase housing construction and states that new construction can be facilitated by reviewing building standards and simplifying processes.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto wants to increase housing construction and states that new construction can be facilitated by reviewing building standards and simplifying processes. The counter-proposal wants to limit exceptions to renovations and maintain full requirements for new construction. It removes precisely the relief the plan seeks for production of smaller and cheaper housing.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet vill öka bostadsbyggandet och slår fast att nybyggnation kan underlättas genom att se över byggnormerna och förenkla processerna. Motförslaget vill begränsa undantagen till ombyggnad och behålla fulla krav vid nybyggnad. Det tar bort just den lättnad planen efterfrågar för nyproduktion av mindre och billigare bostäder.
- relief for new constructiondecisive»Nybyggnation kan underlättas genom att se över byggnormer och öka konkurrensen på byggmarknaden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“New construction can be facilitated by reviewing building standards and increasing competition on the construction market.”
- more housing»Öka bostadsbyggandet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Increase housing construction”
- simplified building regulations»Anpassa och förenkla regler och processer för planering och byggnation« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Adapt and simplify rules and processes for planning and construction”
- housing for young people»Förbättra möjligheterna för unga att skaffa sin första bostad« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Improve opportunities for young people to acquire their first home”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2024/25:CU19)
- Committee report full text (HC01CU19)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2024/25:3361 — med anledning av prop. 2024/25:132 Lättnader i byggkraven för studentbostäder av Malcolm Momodou Jallow m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2024/25:3367 — med anledning av prop. 2024/25:132 Lättnader i byggkraven för studentbostäder av Jennie Nilsson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2024/25:3386 — med anledning av prop. 2024/25:132 Lättnader i byggkraven för studentbostäder av Märta Stenevi m.fl. (MP)
- Proposition 2024/25:132 — Lättnader i byggkraven för studentbostäder
Source: The Swedish Parliament