2025-04-092024/25:KU23 · p.3KUConstitution
Corruption
Efforts against corruption and infiltration in public administration
What's at stake: How corruption and infiltration are handled affects trust in government agencies, municipalities and regions, and determines whether local actors get extra support and resources for this work.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the Riksdag should take a specific initiative against corruption and infiltration in public administration, with extra support for municipalities and regions, or whether the work already under way within the state is sufficient.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee stresses that work against corruption and infiltration is already under way in state administration, including a new action plan against corruption and a special inquiry into the criminal legislation, and therefore rejects the motions.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 5 (C)
The dissenter (C) believes the state should also ensure municipalities and regions get support and guidance in the work against corruption and infiltration, since both have increased in recent years despite Sweden's internationally favourable standing, and wants the government to ensure coordinated support with adequate resources.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 5 by C.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Yes 20/0/0/4 | departs from the plan | confidence: high | not addressed |
| S | No | Abstain 0/0/93/13 | departs from the plan | confidence: high | not addressed |
| MP | No | Yes 13/1/0/4 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| C | No | No 0/19/0/5 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 13/0/0/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| KD | No | Yes 15/0/0/4 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| M | No | Yes 60/0/0/8 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| SD | No | Yes 62/0/0/10 | departs from the plan | confidence: high | not addressed |
Broke with the party line
| MPCamilla Hansén (MP, Örebro län) | No — party line: Yes |
MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.
Committee proposal
Parliament rejects the motions 2024/25:64 by Johnny Svedin (SD), 2024/25:445 by Serkan Köse (S), 2024/25:3111 by Teresa Carvalho et al. (S) amendment 19 and 2024/25:3164 by Ulrika Liljeberg et al. (C) amendment 47.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2024/25:64 av Johnny Svedin (SD), 2024/25:445 av Serkan Köse (S), 2024/25:3111 av Teresa Carvalho m.fl. (S) yrkande 19 och 2024/25:3164 av Ulrika Liljeberg m.fl. (C) yrkande 47.
Riksdag decision: Parliament rejected approximately 60 proposals on public administration in motions from the general motion period 2024. The reason is, among other things, that work is already underway and measures have been taken in the areas covered by the proposals. The proposals address, among other things, the promotion of democracy, state employment, corruption and the protection of decision-makers.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to strengthen the work of authorities for increased democratic participation for people with disabilities and ensure accessibility in all public services. (C) — Reservation 5
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan demands effective monitoring of organised economic crime precisely to prevent it from manifesting as corruption, and points out that criminals have infiltrated the ownership structures of welfare.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan demands effective monitoring of organised economic crime precisely to prevent it from manifesting as corruption, and points out that criminals have infiltrated the ownership structures of welfare. Coordinated support and sufficient resources to municipalities and regions in that work follow directly from it. The plan also wants to increase insight into companies to prevent fraud.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver en effektiv uppföljning av den organiserade ekonomiska brottsligheten just för att förhindra att den tar sig uttryck i korruption, och pekar på att kriminella sökt sig in i välfärdens ägarstrukturer. Samordnat stöd och tillräckliga resurser till kommuner och regioner i det arbetet följer direkt av det. Planen vill också öka insynen i företag för att stävja fusk.
- monitoring against corruptiondecisive»Det behövs en effektiv uppföljning av den organiserade ekonomiska brottsligheten för att förhindra att den också börjar ta sig uttryck i till exempel korruption eller våld.« (party programme ↗)“There is a need for effective monitoring of organised economic crime to prevent it from also beginning to manifest as for example corruption or violence.”
- criminals in welfare»Privatiseringarna av välfärden öppnar upp för kriminella att sko sig på skattemedel.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Privatisations of welfare open up for criminals to profit from tax revenue.”
- transparency to prevent fraud»Vi vill gå mot en större samhällelig insyn i företag där det behövs för att stävja fusk med till exempel skatter och anställningar.« (party programme ↗)“We want to move towards greater societal insight into companies where needed to prevent fraud with for example taxes and employment.”
- resources to municipalities»Omfördelningen från stat till region och kommun måste öka och särskild hänsyn ska tas till de många kommuner och regioner som idag inte får ihop sin ekonomi samtidigt som de redan har bland landets högsta skatter totalt sett.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Redistribution from state to region and municipality must increase and particular attention shall be paid to the many municipalities and regions that today cannot make ends meet while they already have among the country's highest taxes in total.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The party programme establishes that bribes and improper influence are devastating for confidence in democracy and that public bodies and law enforcement authorities have a shared responsibility to prevent such with all their force.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme establishes that bribes and improper influence are devastating for confidence in democracy and that public bodies and law enforcement authorities have a shared responsibility to prevent such with all their force. Coordinated support with sufficient resources to municipalities and regions against corruption and infiltration is a direct expression of that responsibility, in line with the requirement that welfare crime shall be stopped. The municipal level is not specifically mentioned in the documents.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår fast att mutor och otillbörlig påverkan är förödande för tilltron till demokratin och att offentliga organ och rättsvårdande myndigheter har ett gemensamt ansvar att med all kraft förhindra sådant. Ett samordnat stöd med tillräckliga resurser till kommuner och regioner mot korruption och infiltration är ett direkt uttryck för det ansvaret, i linje med kravet att välfärdsbrottslighet ska stoppas. Den kommunala nivån nämns inte särskilt i dokumenten.
- shared responsibility against corruptiondecisive»ett gemensamt ansvar att med all kraft förhindra all form av otillbörlig påverkan.« (party programme ↗)“a shared responsibility to prevent all forms of improper influence with all their force.”
- bribes undermine democracy»bestickningar och mutor i syfte att påverka besluten eller genomförandet av dem.« (party programme ↗)“bribes and corrupt payments in order to influence decisions or their implementation.”
- stop welfare crime»Skattefusk, välfärdsbrottslighet och penningtvätt ska stoppas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Tax fraud, welfare crime and money laundering shall be stopped.”
- inter-agency cooperation»Sekretesshinder mellan myndigheter ska rivas så att polisen och andra yrkesgrupper kan göra sitt jobb.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Secrecy barriers between authorities shall be removed so that police and other professions can do their job.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan establishes that all forms of corruption must be combated and wants to strengthen authority cooperation so that authorities can strike against organized crime's activities.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that all forms of corruption must be combated and wants to strengthen authority cooperation so that authorities can strike against organized crime's activities. Coordinated support and guidance to municipalities and regions against corruption and infiltration is a means for this, and the plan also emphasizes transparency as protection against abuse of power. Municipal support specifically is not mentioned, so the support is derived.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att alla former av korruption måste motarbetas och vill stärka myndighetssamverkan så att myndigheterna kan slå till mot den organiserade brottslighetens verksamhet. Ett samordnat stöd och vägledning till kommuner och regioner mot korruption och infiltration är ett medel för detta, och planen betonar också insyn som skydd mot maktmissbruk. Just kommunalt stöd nämns inte, därför härledning.
- combat all corruptiondecisive»Alla former av korruption« (party programme ↗)“All forms of corruption”
- authority cooperation against infiltration»stoppa finansieringen av de kriminella gängen genom att stärka myndighetssamverkan så att myndigheterna kan slå till mot den organiserade brottslighetens företag från flera håll« (2022 manifesto ↗)“stop financing of criminal gangs by strengthening authority cooperation so that authorities can strike against organized crime's enterprises from multiple directions”
- transparency against abuse of power»Offentlighetsprincipen och meddelarfriheten måste« (party programme ↗)“The public access principle and freedom of information must”
- scrutiny of power»kunna granska makten.« (party programme ↗)“be able to scrutinize power.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wants to make Sweden even more transparent, establish an anti-corruption authority and sharpen rules against corruption, and states that democratic institutions need protection against external influence and infiltration.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to make Sweden even more transparent, establish an anti-corruption authority and sharpen rules against corruption, and states that democratic institutions need protection against external influence and infiltration. The counter-proposal wants to give municipalities and regions coordinated support and guidance in precisely this work. The plan also emphasizes that openness and transparency are basic prerequisites to prevent corruption. The plan therefore supports the requirement.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill göra Sverige ännu mer transparent, inrätta en antikorruptionsmyndighet och skärpa reglerna mot korruption, och slår fast att demokratiska institutioner behöver skydd mot yttre påverkan och infiltration. Motförslaget vill ge kommuner och regioner samordnat stöd och vägledning i just detta arbete. Planen betonar också att öppenhet och transparens är grundförutsättningar för att förhindra korruption. Planen stöder därför kravet.
- stronger anti-corruption workdecisive»Sverige ska bli ännu mer transparent. Vi vill inrätta en antikorruptionsmyndighet, skärpa regler mot korruption och införa ett lobbyregister.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden shall become even more transparent. We want to establish an anti-corruption authority, sharpen rules against corruption and introduce a lobbying register.”
- transparency prevents corruption»Öppenhet och transparens är grundförutsättningar för frihet, demokrati och för att förhindra korruption och övergrepp.« (party programme ↗)“Openness and transparency are basic prerequisites for freedom, democracy and for preventing corruption and abuse.”
- resilience against infiltration»Reglerna för finansiering av politiska partier bör skärpas och deras motståndskraft mot yttre påverkan och infiltration rustas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Rules for financing of political parties should be sharpened and their resilience against external influence and infiltration strengthened.”
- protect democratic institutions»Våra demokratiska institutioner behöver skydd.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Our democratic institutions need protection.”
The plan establishes that much more must be done against extremist environments and separatists gaining a foothold in publicly funded activities, and that public employees shall be protected against pressure and persecution.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that much more must be done against extremist environments and separatists gaining a foothold in publicly funded activities, and that public employees shall be protected against pressure and persecution. Coordinated support to municipalities and regions against corruption and infiltration serves that commitment directly. The plan's requirement for a strengthened rule of law points in the same direction.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att mycket mer måste göras mot att extremistmiljöer och separatister får fäste i offentligt finansierad verksamhet, och att offentliganställda ska skyddas mot påtryckningar och förföljelse. Ett samordnat stöd till kommuner och regioner mot korruption och infiltration tjänar det åtagandet direkt. Planens krav på en stärkt rättsstat pekar åt samma håll.
- stop infiltration of the publicdecisive»När Säpo säger att flera organisationer från extremistmiljöer finansieras av skattepengar måste mycket mer göras.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“When the Security Police say that several organizations from extremist environments are financed by tax money much more must be done.”
- protection of public employees»Socialsekreterare och andra offentliganställda ska skyddas mot förföljelse och utsatthet genom att ett nytt brott – tjänstemannaförföljelse – införs.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Social workers and other public employees shall be protected against persecution and vulnerability by introducing a new crime – official persecution.”
- strengthened rule of law»Rättsstaten ska stärkas.« (party programme ↗)“The rule of law shall be strengthened.”
- strengthened monitoring of grants»Vi vill både stärka uppföljningen av bidragsgivning« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want both to strengthen the monitoring of grant-giving”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan requires a complete review of secrecy rules so that authorities can share information to prevent and solve crimes, which is the core of work against infiltration.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires a complete review of secrecy rules so that authorities can share information to prevent and solve crimes, which is the core of work against infiltration. It also requires that all crimes are prosecuted effectively and highlights honesty as a core social value. Coordinated state support to municipalities and regions aligns with this.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver en total översyn av sekretessreglerna så att myndigheter kan dela uppgifter för att förebygga och klara upp brott, vilket är kärnan i arbetet mot infiltration. Den kräver också att alla brott beivras effektivt och lyfter hederlighet som ett bärande samhällsvärde. Ett samordnat statligt stöd till kommuner och regioner ligger i linje med detta.
- authority cooperation against crimedecisive»Total översyn av sekretessreglerna, så att myndigheter kan dela uppgifter mellan sig för att förebygga och klara upp brott.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Complete review of secrecy rules, so that authorities can share information between them to prevent and solve crimes.”
- all crimes shall be prosecuted»Alla brott ska effektivt och utan undantag beivras, också sådana som kan avfärdas som smärre brott« (party programme ↗)“All crimes shall be effectively and without exception prosecuted, also such that may be dismissed as minor crimes”
- honesty as a social value»Vi når dit genom att i vår demokrati främja goda värden som medmänsklighet ansvarstagande, förvaltarskap, hederlighet, måttfullhet och jämställdhet och.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We reach there by in our democracy promoting good values such as compassion responsibility, stewardship, honesty, moderation and equality and.”
- means against abuse of power»Det måste finnas effektiva medel mot maktmiss« (party programme ↗)“There must be effective means against abuse of power”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The counter-proposal requires coordinated support and guidance to municipalities and regions in the work against corruption and criminal infiltration.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal requires coordinated support and guidance to municipalities and regions in the work against corruption and criminal infiltration. The plan sees criminal structures with ambitions to compete with the state for control as a threat to be fought, wants to strengthen civil service accountability so that responsibility accompanies all public administration, and states that public waste in all forms shall be combated. The plan therefore supports the demand.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslaget kräver samordnat stöd och vägledning till kommuner och regioner i arbetet mot korruption och kriminell infiltration. Planen ser kriminella strukturer med ambitioner att konkurrera med staten om kontrollen som ett hot som ska bekämpas, vill skärpa tjänstemannaansvaret så att ansvar följer med all offentlig maktutövning och slår fast att offentligt slöseri i alla former ska bekämpas. Planen stöder därför kravet.
- strengthened civil service accountabilitydecisive»Skärpa tjänstemannaansvaret så att du som skattebetalare vet att med all offentlig maktutövning följer ett ansvar för de beslut som fattas« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen civil service accountability so that you as a taxpayer know that with all public administration comes responsibility for the decisions taken”
- counteract criminal infiltration»som har ett omfattande våldskapital och uttalade ambitioner att konkurrera med den svenska staten om kontrollen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“who have extensive violent capital and stated ambitions to compete with the Swedish state for control”
- respect for public funds»Offentligt slöseri i alla former ska bekämpas.« (party programme ↗)“Public waste in all forms shall be combated.”
- rule-based administration»All offentlig maktutövning ska vara lagstyrd och vägledas av« (party programme ↗)“All public administration shall be rule-based and guided by”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan states that clans, organized crime and Islamists are infiltrating state organs and that this is a growing threat to the democratic model, and wants to counteract the power of clans both within the public sector and within civil society.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that clans, organized crime and Islamists are infiltrating state organs and that this is a growing threat to the democratic model, and wants to counteract the power of clans both within the public sector and within civil society. Municipalities and regions are exactly the levels where infiltration occurs, so coordinated support and guidance there aligns with the plan. The plan also demands that fraud and corruption-promoting systems be counteracted and that official responsibility be reintroduced.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att klaner, organiserad brottslighet och islamister infiltrerar samhällsorgan och att detta är ett växande hot mot den demokratiska modellen, och vill motverka klanernas makt både inom det offentliga och inom civilsamhället. Kommuner och regioner är just de nivåer där infiltrationen sker, så samordnat stöd och vägledning dit ligger i linje med planen. Planen kräver också att fusk och korruptionsdrivande system motverkas och att tjänstemannaansvaret återinförs.
- counteract clan power in the public sectordecisive»Motverka klanernas makt, både inom det offentliga och inom civilsamhället« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Counteract the power of clans, both within the public sector and within civil society”
- infiltration as a democratic threat»Att klaner, organiserad brottslighet och islamister infiltrerar samhällsorgan är ett växande hot mot den demokratiska modellen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“That clans, organized crime and Islamists are infiltrating state organs is a growing threat to the democratic model.”
- counteract corruption»Både fusk och sådana system som tenderar att locka till fusk och korruption ska motverkas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Both fraud and systems that tend to encourage fraud and corruption should be counteracted.”
- official responsibility»Återinför tjänstemannaansvaret« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Reintroduce official responsibility”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2024/25:KU23)
- Committee report full text (HC01KU23)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2024/25:1098 — Opinionsbildande myndigheter och statliga bolag av Helena Storckenfeldt och Lars Püss (båda M)
- Motion 2024/25:1101 — En säkrare myndighetsutövning av Helena Storckenfeldt (M)
- Motion 2024/25:1109 — Användarvänliga myndigheter av Marléne Lund Kopparklint och Jennie Wernäng (båda M)
- Motion 2024/25:1172 — Införandet av tjänstemannaansvaret av Larry Söder (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:1220 — Myndighetsservice i icke-digitala kanaler av Torsten Elofsson (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:1252 — Nationellt kunskapscenter för dövfrågor av Jessica Rodén och Louise Thunström (båda S)
- Motion 2024/25:1284 — Plan för implementering av AI-stöd inom svenska myndigheter av Susanne Nordström m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2024/25:1345 — Det svenska språkets bevarande av Runar Filper m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1380 — En behövlig myndighetsöversyn av Matheus Enholm m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1393 — Post och it i hela landet av Thomas Morell m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1454 — Regional utveckling - för ett levande Sverige av Tobias Andersson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1581 — Inrättande av ett pris för att uppmärksamma och motarbeta byråkrati hos myndigheter av Magnus Berntsson (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:1774 — Stärkt kulturpolitik - stärkt demokrati av Mats Berglund m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2024/25:1890 — Offentlig information på lättläst svenska av Anne-Li Sjölund och Ulrika Heie (båda C)
- Motion 2024/25:1932 — Språk och litteratur av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2024/25:1952 — Kortare handläggningstider hos statliga myndigheter av Margareta Cederfelt (M)
- Motion 2024/25:2031 — Införande av s.k. declaration of interest för offentligt anställda av Mats Green (M)
- Motion 2024/25:2032 — Skarpare direktiv vad gäller myndigheterna och äganderätten av Mats Green (M)
- Motion 2024/25:2056 — För ett tryggare Malmö och Sverige av Niels Paarup-Petersen (C)
- Motion 2024/25:207 — Ett civilsamhälle skilt från staten av Josef Fransson (SD)
Source: The Swedish Parliament