2026-03-182025/26:FöU10 · p.7FöUDefence
Supply security and supply reserves
Supply security and emergency stockpiles in total defence
What's at stake: The decision affects how well Sweden can secure access to food, medicine and fuel if a crisis or war disrupts imports, which concerns the whole population and especially the ability of healthcare and the food chain to keep functioning under heightened alert.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether today's minimum three-month planning horizon for total defence supply security should be extended and the degree of self-sufficiency raised, or whether the current direction and the ongoing build-up of stockpiles should stand.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee agrees that today's minimum three-month planning horizon should stand and rejects extending it, noting that peacetime preparedness always means a lower level of ambition than normal conditions; instead it welcomes the investment in stockpiles of grain, food, medicine and fuel and the resources already allocated for pandemic preparedness, and sees no reason to direct further requests to the government at this time.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 15 (C)
The dissenter wants to extend today's minimum three-month planning horizon for total defence supply security and raise the degree of self-sufficiency for essential goods and services nationwide, arguing that Sweden is strategically dependent on imported inputs such as feed, seed, pesticides and spare parts; the dissenter also proposes stronger military protection of shipping lanes and harbours to secure the supply of essential goods.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 15 by C.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have gone the other way
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: KDKristdemokraterna, MModeraterna, SDSverigedemokraterna
Ja 166–21Nej 27–160
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Yes 15/0/0/7 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| S | No | Abstain 0/0/93/13 | differs | confidence: high | derived |
| MP | No | Abstain 0/0/16/2 | differs | confidence: high | explicit |
| C | No | No 0/21/0/3 | match | confidence: high | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 10/0/0/6 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| KD | No | Yes 17/0/0/2 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| M | No | Yes 60/0/0/8 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| SD | No | Yes 62/0/0/9 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2025/26:1069 by Fredrik Lundh Sammeli et al. (S) amendment 3, 2025/26:2031 by Sten Bergheden (M), 2025/26:2805 by Markus Wiechel and Eric Palmqvist (both SD), 2025/26:2822 by Mikael Larsson et al. (C) amendments 8, 49 and 50, 2025/26:3185 by Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist et al. (C) amendment 38, 2025/26:3232 by Marléne Lund Kopparklint (M), 2025/26:3405 by Emma Berginger et al. (MP) amendments 29, 32 and 33, 2025/26:3556 by Peter Hultqvist et al. (S) amendment 70 and 2025/26:3733 by Åsa Westlund et al. (S) amendment 29.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2025/26:1069 av Fredrik Lundh Sammeli m.fl. (S) yrkande 3, 2025/26:2031 av Sten Bergheden (M), 2025/26:2805 av Markus Wiechel och Eric Palmqvist (båda SD), 2025/26:2822 av Mikael Larsson m.fl. (C) yrkandena 8, 49 och 50, 2025/26:3185 av Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist m.fl. (C) yrkande 38, 2025/26:3232 av Marléne Lund Kopparklint (M), 2025/26:3405 av Emma Berginger m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 29, 32 och 33, 2025/26:3556 av Peter Hultqvist m.fl. (S) yrkande 70 och 2025/26:3733 av Åsa Westlund m.fl. (S) yrkande 29.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected 160 proposals on total defence. The proposals were submitted during the general motion period 2025 and address, among other things, the operational capabilities and war organization of the Armed Forces, exercise activities, and Sweden's support for Ukraine. The Riksdag refers primarily to the fact that the considerations made in the decision on total defence for the period 2025–2030 remain in place and to the ongoing work within many of the different areas raised by the proposers.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to ensure that the whole country can be defended through improved operational capacity. (C) — Reservation 15
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan establishes that Sweden has good opportunities to become more self-sufficient in energy and food and that the state has a particular responsibility for food provision.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that Sweden has good opportunities to become more self-sufficient in energy and food and that the state has a particular responsibility for food provision. It wants to see total defence with broad capacity to meet various kinds of crises. A longer planning horizon and higher self-sufficiency for socially important goods follow from that, while military protection of shipping lanes is a minor part of the demand.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att Sverige har goda möjligheter att bli mer självförsörjande på energi och livsmedel och att staten har ett särskilt ansvar för livsmedelsförsörjningen. Den vill se ett totalförsvar med bred förmåga att möta olika slags kriser. En längre planeringshorisont och högre självförsörjningsgrad för samhällsviktiga varor följer av det, medan det militära skyddet av farleder är en mindre del av kravet.
- increased self-sufficiencydecisive»bli mer självförsörjande på energi och livsmedel.« (party programme ↗)“become more self-sufficient in energy and food.”
- state responsibility for food»se till att landet är tillräckligt självförsörjande med livsmedel.« (party programme ↗)“ensure that the country is sufficiently self-sufficient in food.”
- broad crisis preparedness»bred förmåga att möta olika former av kriser Sverige kan ställas inför.« (party programme ↗)“broad capacity to meet various forms of crises Sweden may face.”
- sustainable food production»En annan viktig del i den gröna omställningen är satsningar på hållbar livsmedelsproduktion.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Another important part of the green transition is investments in sustainable food production.”
Worldstate weighed in: War outbreak between USA/Israel and Iran with the Foreign Ministry's warning against several Gulf states — Disrupts global commodity flows and sharpens the plan's demands for domestic supply preparedness
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan requires that work on civil defense and crisis preparedness continues with increased resources to build emergency stockpiles, and that viable food production strengthens the country's self-sufficiency capacity.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that work on civil defense and crisis preparedness continues with increased resources to build emergency stockpiles, and that viable food production strengthens the country's self-sufficiency capacity. It supports the counter-proposal's requirement for a longer planning horizon and higher self-sufficiency rate for societally crucial goods. The requirement for military protection of shipping lanes and ports follows from the commitment to strong infrastructure for preparedness.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att arbetet med det civila försvaret och krisberedskapen fortsätter med ökade resurser för att bygga beredskapslager, och att en livskraftig livsmedelsproduktion stärker landets självförsörjningsförmåga. Det bär motförslagets krav på längre planeringshorisont och högre självförsörjningsgrad för samhällsviktiga varor. Kravet på militärt skydd av farleder och hamnar följer av åtagandet om stark infrastruktur för beredskap.
- expanded emergency stockpilesdecisive»Arbetet att förstärka det civila försvaret och krisberedskapen måste fortsätta, bland annat genom ökade resurser för att rusta och bygga beredskapslager för sjukvården« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The work to strengthen civil defense and crisis preparedness must continue, partly through increased resources to equip and build emergency stockpiles for healthcare”
- raised self-sufficiency rate»Livskraftig svensk livsmedelsproduktion som stärker landets självförsörjningsförmåga.« (party programme ↗)“Viable Swedish food production that strengthens the country's self-sufficiency capacity.”
- protected supply infrastructure»Stark infrastruktur för stärkt beredskap.« (party programme ↗)“Strong infrastructure for enhanced preparedness.”
- equipped civil defense»Rusta upp det civila försvaret.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Equip and strengthen civil defense.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan explicitly demands that self-sufficiency of important and necessary products increases to cope with future crises, and that agriculture is strengthened for increased self-sufficiency in basic foodstuffs.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly demands that self-sufficiency of important and necessary products increases to cope with future crises, and that agriculture is strengthened for increased self-sufficiency in basic foodstuffs. A longer planning horizon and higher self-sufficiency is exactly what the counter-proposal demands. The plan also wants a larger share of defence funds to go to civil defence and emergency preparedness.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver uttryckligen att självförsörjningsgraden av viktiga och nödvändiga produkter ökar för att klara framtida kriser, och att jordbruket stärks för ökad självförsörjning med baslivsmedel. En längre planeringshorisont och högre självförsörjningsgrad är precis det motförslaget kräver. Planen vill också att en större andel av försvarets pengar går till det civila försvaret och krisberedskapen.
- increased self-sufficiencydecisive»självförsörjningsgrad av viktiga och nödvändiga produkter« (party programme ↗)“self-sufficiency of important and necessary products”
- self-sufficiency in basic foodstuffs»stärka det svenska jordbruket för ökad självförsörjning med baslivsmedel« (2022 manifesto ↗)“strengthen Swedish agriculture for increased self-sufficiency in basic foodstuffs”
- strengthened civil defence»satsa en större andel av försvarets pengar på det civila försvaret, och öka anslagen till krisberedskap.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“allocate a larger share of defence funds to civil defence and increase appropriations for emergency preparedness.”
- preparedness for crises»Alla samhällen drabbas förr eller senare av allvarliga händelser.« (party programme ↗)“All societies are affected sooner or later by serious events.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan states that food supply is vital in the event of war or crisis and that food production must increase in the short and long term, and that civil defence and societal preparedness shall be strengthened.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that food supply is vital in the event of war or crisis and that food production must increase in the short and long term, and that civil defence and societal preparedness shall be strengthened. Rural conditions are explicitly linked to Sweden's preparedness. A longer planning horizon and higher self-sufficiency for societally important goods follow from these commitments.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att livsmedelsförsörjningen är livsviktig i händelse av krig eller kris och att matproduktionen måste öka på kort och lång sikt, samt att civilförsvaret och samhällets beredskap ska rustas. Landsbygdens villkor kopplas uttryckligen till Sveriges beredskap. En längre planeringshorisont och högre självförsörjningsgrad för samhällsviktiga varor följer av dessa åtaganden.
- increased food supplydecisive»Efter de senaste årens handelsstörningar, varubrist och höga priser har fler fått upp ögonen för värdet av en konkurrenskraftig och välmående livsmedelsförsörjning. Den är viktig i goda tider och livsviktig i händelse av krig eller kris. Matproduktionen måste öka, på kort och lång sikt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Following recent years of trade disruption, shortages and high prices, more people have come to appreciate the value of a competitive and prosperous food supply. It is important in good times and vital in the event of war or crisis. Food production must increase, in the short and long term.”
- strengthen civil preparedness»Även det civila försvaret är livsviktigt. Vi måste rusta civilförsvaret och samhällets beredskap inför krig och kris.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Civil defence too is vital. We must strengthen civil defence and societal preparedness for war and crisis.”
- increased supply security»En långsiktigt hållbar livsmedelsförsörjning med ökad försörjningstrygghet och ökad matproduktion kräver regelförenklingar och skattesänkningar, inklusive ett kraftfullt jordbruksavdrag och en biodrivmedelspremie som gör det hållbara lantbruket mer lönsamt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“A long-term sustainable food supply with increased supply security and increased food production requires regulatory simplification and tax cuts, including a powerful agricultural deduction and a biofuel premium that make sustainable farming more profitable.”
- rural areas as preparedness resource»Om vi lyckas förbättra landsbygdernas villkor gör vi en insats för hela landets bästa — för Sveriges beredskap och för framtida generationer.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“If we succeed in improving rural conditions, we make a contribution to the whole country's benefit — for Sweden's preparedness and for future generations.”
The plan requires that civil defence is strengthened at the same pace as the military and that total defence is strengthened significantly in the most difficult security situation since World War II.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that civil defence is strengthened at the same pace as the military and that total defence is strengthened significantly in the most difficult security situation since World War II. It also sees undemocratic states' control over ports and power grids as a security risk and highlights the importance of maritime transport. A longer planning horizon, higher self-sufficiency and protection of fairways follow from this.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att det civila försvaret stärks i samma takt som det militära och att totalförsvaret stärks kraftigt i det svåraste säkerhetsläget sedan andra världskriget. Den ser också odemokratiska staters kontroll över hamnar och elnät som en säkerhetsrisk och lyfter sjötransporternas betydelse. En längre planeringshorisont, högre självförsörjning och skydd av farleder följer av detta.
- civil defence at pace with militarydecisive»Antalet anställda och värnpliktiga i krigsorganisationen ska öka, ny materiel tillföras och det civila försvaret stärkas i samma takt som det militära.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The number of employees and conscripts in the war organization shall increase, new equipment be supplied and civil defence shall be strengthened at the same pace as the military.”
- significantly strengthened total defence»behöver Sveriges totalförsvar stärkas kraftigt.« (party programme ↗)“Sweden's total defence needs to be strengthened significantly.”
- protect strategic infrastructure»Den utveckling där odemokratiska eller rentav totalitära stater förvärvar strategiska« (party programme ↗)“The development where undemocratic or indeed totalitarian states acquire strategic”
- maritime transport's importance»Goda möjligheter till sjötransporter är ett viktigt inslag i infrastrukturen.« (party programme ↗)“Good opportunities for maritime transport are an important part of infrastructure.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan establishes that Sweden in principle shall be able to provide the population's food and energy supply and maintain good preparedness for cutoff of foreign trade, which is exactly the higher self-sufficiency degree and longer planning horizon the counter-proposal requires.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that Sweden in principle shall be able to provide the population's food and energy supply and maintain good preparedness for cutoff of foreign trade, which is exactly the higher self-sufficiency degree and longer planning horizon the counter-proposal requires. The election manifesto also wants to increase Sweden's self-sufficiency through rule changes and cost relief for agriculture, which addresses dependence on imported feed, seed and pesticides. The demand for adequate resources to the overall defense contributes to the proposal to militarily protect shipping lanes and harbors.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att Sverige i princip ska kunna svara för befolkningens livsmedels- och energiförsörjning och hålla god beredskap inför avspärrning av utrikeshandeln, vilket är precis den högre självförsörjningsgrad och längre planeringshorisont motförslaget kräver. Valmanifestet vill dessutom öka Sveriges självförsörjning genom regeländringar och kostnadslättnader för lantbruket, vilket träffar beroendet av importerat foder, utsäde och bekämpningsmedel. Kravet på tillräckliga resurser till det samlade totalförsvaret bär även förslaget om militärt skydd av farleder och hamnar.
- national supply capacitydecisive»kunna svara för befolkningens livsmedels och energiförsörjning samt hålla en god beredskap« (party programme ↗)“be able to provide the population's food and energy supply and maintain good preparedness”
- preparedness for cutoff»inför avspärrning av utrikeshandeln.« (party programme ↗)“in the event of cutoff of foreign trade.”
- increased self-sufficiency»Regeländringar och kostnadslättnader för svenskt lantbruk för att öka Sveriges självförsörjning och stärka lantbrukets konkurrenskraft.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Rule changes and cost relief for Swedish agriculture to increase Sweden's self-sufficiency and strengthen agriculture's competitiveness.”
- adequate resources to total defense»Det samlade totalförsvaret måste ha tillräckliga resurser för att kunna garantera« (party programme ↗)“The overall defense must have adequate resources to be able to guarantee”
Worldstate weighed in: USA and Israel attacks against Iran in February 2026 — makes the plan's requirement for preparedness for cutoff of foreign trade more acute; UD's advisory against travel to several Gulf states — shows how quickly import of input materials and fuel can be disrupted
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan connects the new security situation to the requirement to reduce vulnerability and raise self-sufficiency, and promises better emergency stocks and long-term planning for civil defence.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan connects the new security situation to the requirement to reduce vulnerability and raise self-sufficiency, and promises better emergency stocks and long-term planning for civil defence. The counter-proposal's requirement for longer planning horizon and higher self-sufficiency of society-critical goods is the same thing in substance. The plan also wants to strengthen agriculture for increased domestic food production.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kopplar det nya säkerhetsläget till kravet att minska sårbarheten och höja självförsörjningsgraden, och lovar bättre beredskapslager och en långsiktig planering för det civila försvaret. Motförslagets krav på längre planeringshorisont och högre självförsörjning av samhällsviktiga varor är samma sak i sak. Planen vill också stärka jordbruket för ökad inhemsk livsmedelsproduktion.
- increased self-sufficiencydecisive»Det nya säkerhetsläget i Europa gör att vi som land måste minska vår sårbarhet och öka vår självförsörjningsgrad.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The new security situation in Europe means that as a country we must reduce our vulnerability and increase our self-sufficiency.”
- better emergency stocks»Bygga bättre beredskapslager« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Build better emergency stocks”
- long-term planning of civil defence»Säkra en långsiktig planering för det civila försvaret« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Ensure long-term planning for civil defence”
- domestic food production»Stärka jordbruket för att öka den inhemska produktionen av livsmedel« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen agriculture to increase domestic food production”
Worldstate weighed in: Israel's and USA's attacks against Iran and worsened security situation in the region — Sharpens the plan's requirements for emergency stocks and supply security for import-dependent inputs.
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The counter-proposal wants to extend the planning horizon for supply preparedness and raise the self-sufficiency rate for socially vital goods, and strengthen military protection of sea lanes and ports.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal wants to extend the planning horizon for supply preparedness and raise the self-sufficiency rate for socially vital goods, and strengthen military protection of sea lanes and ports. The election manifesto explicitly demands increased self-sufficiency for critical goods and that emergency stockpiles are dimensioned for the entire population's needs over the time period that is plausible in a severe crisis. Shipping is also pointed out as part of total defence.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslaget vill förlänga planeringshorisonten för försörjningsberedskapen och höja självförsörjningsgraden av samhällsviktiga varor, samt stärka det militära skyddet av farleder och hamnar. Valmanifestet kräver uttryckligen ökad självförsörjningsgrad av kritiska varor och att beredskapslagren dimensioneras för hela befolkningens behov över den tidsutdräkt som är plausibel i en svår kris. Sjöfarten pekas dessutom ut som en del av totalförsvaret.
- stockpiles for the entire crisis durationdecisive»De bör vara dimensionerade för att täcka hela den svenska befolkningens potentiella behov över sådan tidsutdräkt som är plausibel i en svår kris.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“They should be dimensioned to cover the entire Swedish population's potential needs over such time period as is plausible in a severe crisis.”
- increased self-sufficiency»Öka den svenska självförsörjningsgraden av kritiska produkter och varor« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Increase Sweden's self-sufficiency rate for critical products and goods”
- scalable supply»Sveriges självförsörjning av energi, livsmedel och medicinskt material behöver öka och snabbt kunna skalas upp vid långvariga störningar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden's self-sufficiency in energy, food and medical material needs to increase and quickly be scalable during prolonged disruptions.”
- shipping part of total defence»Vi behöver även stärka den svenska sjöfarten för att säkra arbets- och utbildningstillfällen men inte minst för att sjöfarten är en del av totalförsvaret.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We also need to strengthen Swedish shipping to secure employment and training opportunities but not least because shipping is part of total defence.”
Worldstate weighed in: War in the Persian Gulf following the US-Israeli attack on Iran and the Ministry for Foreign Affairs' advising against travel to several Gulf states — the strategic dependence on imported materials and fuel becomes acute, which sharpens the plan's requirement for longer durability and higher self-sufficiency
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:FöU10)
- Committee report full text (HD01FöU10)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:1002 — Svenskar som har försvarat Ukraina av Magnus Jacobsson (KD)
- Motion 2025/26:102 — Uppsägning av DCA-avtalet med USA av Hanna Gunnarsson m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:1054 — Mänsklighetens utveckling och de existentiella hoten av Jamal El-Haj (-)
- Motion 2025/26:1069 — Norrbottens strategiska roll i en ny tid av Fredrik Lundh Sammeli m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1238 — Värnande av Vätterns vatten av Niklas Sigvardsson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1443 — Prioritering av den nationella säkerheten framför andra intressen vid offentlig upphandling eller utländska investeringar i Sverige av Patrik Lundqvist m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1616 — Ett robust försvar i Halland av Jennie Nilsson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1659 — Stärkt försvar av Göteborg och västkusten av David Josefsson och Marie-Louise Hänel Sandström (båda M)
- Motion 2025/26:1662 — En självständig och säker livsmedelsförsörjning för Sverige och Norden av Emma Ahlström Köster (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1891 — Snabbare uppbyggnad av krigssjukvård till stöd för Ukraina av Magnus Resare (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1892 — Säkerställd tillgång till ortopedisk specialistkompetens i krigssjukvård av Magnus Resare (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1971 — Nationell preppingkampanj av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2031 — Plan för att säkra tillverkningen av skyddsutrustning i Sverige av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2025/26:225 — Återupprättande av Kalixlinjen av Björn Tidland (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:226 — Införande av drönargrupper i det svenska försvaret av Björn Tidland (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:23 — Krigsmateriel och miljöregler av Josef Fransson (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:2402 — Ukraina i Joint Expeditionary Force av Markus Wiechel (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:2475 — Försvaret av Gotland av Jesper Skalberg Karlsson (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2491 — Totalförsvarets behov av skjutbanor av Jesper Skalberg Karlsson (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2503 — Stärkt roll för Sörmland i totalförsvaret av Anna af Sillén och Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (båda M)
Source: The Swedish Parliament