2024-05-292023/24:NU14 · p.1NUBusiness & energy
The direction of energy policy
The overall direction of energy policy
What's at stake: How the direction of energy policy is framed affects the pace of the climate transition, Sweden's competitiveness and vulnerability to imported fossil energy, and how quickly new electricity production and transmission capacity are built out for households and businesses across the country.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question concerns the overall direction of energy policy - whether parliament should stick with the government's current focus on a fossil-free electricity system, or broaden and sharpen the ambition to cover the whole energy system and set an earlier interim target for new electricity production.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee rejects the motions and upholds the direction set out in the government bill. It agrees that Sweden's competitiveness and welfare rest on access to fossil-free energy at competitive prices, that extensive electrification is the way forward for the climate goals and the green transition, and that energy policy must at the same time deliver a security of supply that phases out fossil fuels and reduces import dependence. The committee welcomes the government's ambition to create good conditions for all fossil-free energy sources, including new nuclear power, strengthened power transmission and renewable generation such as solar and wind.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 2 (C)
The reservation (C) wants to sharpen and broaden the target from 100 percent fossil-free electricity production by 2040 to a 100 percent fossil-free energy system by the same year, so that fuels and industrial inputs are covered too, while still giving nuclear power a continued substantial role in the energy mix. It also wants parliament to adopt a planning target of at least 100 TWh of new electricity production by 2030, aiming eventually to double electricity production, and to launch new cross-party energy talks to secure stable, long-term rules of the game.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 2 by C.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have gone the other way
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: LLiberalerna, MModeraterna
Ja 152–19Nej 83–88
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | Yes | Abstain 5/0/13/6 | differs | confidence: medium | explicit |
| S | No | Abstain 0/0/91/15 | differs | confidence: high | explicit |
| MP | Yes | Abstain 0/0/14/4 | differs | confidence: high | explicit |
| C | No | No 0/19/0/5 | match | confidence: medium | derived |
| L | No | Yes 11/0/0/5 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| KD | No | Yes 16/0/0/3 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| M | No | Yes 58/0/0/10 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: medium | explicit |
| SD | No | Yes 61/0/0/11 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
Broke with the party line
| VCiczie Weidby (V, Jönköpings län) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
| VDaniel Riazat (V, Stockholms län) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
| VIda Gabrielsson (V, Stockholms kommun) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
| VKarin Rågsjö (V, Stockholms kommun) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
| VLorena Delgado Varas (V, Stockholms kommun) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2023/24:13 by Björn Tidland (SD), 2023/24:1281 by Hanna Westerén (S), 2023/24:1527 by Linus Lakso et al. (MP) demand 28, 2023/24:1572 by Adnan Dibrani and Jennie Nilsson (both S) demand 1, 2023/24:1935 by Sofia Amloh et al. (S), 2023/24:1991 by Jamal El-Haj et al. (S) demand 1, 2023/24:2358 by Rose-Marie Carlsson et al. (S), 2023/24:2453 by Rickard Nordin et al. (C) demands 60, 64, 65, 72 and 89, 2023/24:2458 by Muharrem Demirok et al. (C) demand 24, 2023/24:2693 by Fredrik Olovsson et al. (S) demands 1, 2, 5 and 6, 2023/24:2853 by Fredrik Olovsson et al. (S, C) demand 5, and 2023/24:2855 by Linus Lakso et al. (MP) demands 4 and 5.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2023/24:13 av Björn Tidland (SD), 2023/24:1281 av Hanna Westerén (S), 2023/24:1527 av Linus Lakso m.fl. (MP) yrkande 28, 2023/24:1572 av Adnan Dibrani och Jennie Nilsson (båda S) yrkande 1, 2023/24:1935 av Sofia Amloh m.fl. (S), 2023/24:1991 av Jamal El-Haj m.fl. (S) yrkande 1, 2023/24:2358 av Rose-Marie Carlsson m.fl. (S), 2023/24:2453 av Rickard Nordin m.fl. (C) yrkandena 60, 64, 65, 72 och 89, 2023/24:2458 av Muharrem Demirok m.fl. (C) yrkande 24, 2023/24:2693 av Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S) yrkandena 1, 2, 5 och 6, 2023/24:2853 av Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S, C) yrkande 5 och 2023/24:2855 av Linus Lakso m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 4 och 5.
Riksdag decision: The government proposes two new goals for Sweden's electricity system: a planning goal and a supply security goal. The Riksdag proposes that the Riksdag should approve the proposal. The planning goal means that the electricity system should provide conditions for delivering the electricity needed for increased electrification and to make the green transition possible. The goal should facilitate planning to meet an electricity need of at least 300 TWh in 2045. The supply security goal means that the Swedish electricity system shall have the ability to deliver electricity where demand exists, at the right time and in sufficient quantity, to the extent that it is cost-effective for society. The authority Swedish National Grid shall be responsible for regular monitoring of the goal. The Riksdag said no to proposals in motions in the energy policy area, including about 130 proposals in motions from the general motion period of 2023.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to expand the energy goal to encompass the entire energy system. (C) — Reservation 2
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The party programme explicitly rejects plans to expand nuclear power as a way out of fossil dependence and wants an energy policy strategy based on renewable electricity.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme explicitly rejects plans to expand nuclear power as a way out of fossil dependence and wants an energy policy strategy based on renewable electricity. The counter-proposal gives nuclear power a continued significant role in the energy mix and makes it a prerequisite for the broader goal, which is at odds with the plan. That the goal is broadened to the entire energy system is however compatible with the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet avvisar uttryckligen planerna på att bygga ut kärnkraften som väg ut ur fossilberoendet och vill se en energipolitisk strategi som bygger på förnybar el. Motförslaget ger kärnkraften en fortsatt betydande roll i energimixen och gör den till en förutsättning för det breddade målet, vilket står i strid med planen. Att målet breddas till hela energisystemet är däremot förenligt med planen.
- rejects expanded nuclear powerdecisive»planerna på att bygga ut kärnkraften som en väg ut ur fossilberoendet.« (party programme ↗)“plans to expand nuclear power as a way out of fossil dependence.”
- energy policy on renewable basis»strategi som bygger på förnybar el och låga klimatutsläpp.« (party programme ↗)“strategy based on renewable electricity and low greenhouse gas emissions.”
- radical renewable expansion»En radikal utbyggnad av den förnybara elproduktionen är avgörande« (party programme ↗)“A radical expansion of renewable electricity production is crucial”
- state investments in renewables»Produktionen av både el och exempelvis vätgas behöver öka kraftigt när vi ställer om från användning av fossila bränslen, därför behöver staten gå in med satsningar på förnybar energi.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The production of both electricity and for example hydrogen needs to increase sharply when we transition from the use of fossil fuels, therefore the state needs to make investments in renewable energy.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The election manifesto explicitly says no sacred cows apply to Sweden's energy needs, that nuclear power is an important part of electricity production for a long time and that the party after the election wants a new energy agreement through cross-bloc energy policy talks.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto explicitly says no sacred cows apply to Sweden's energy needs, that nuclear power is an important part of electricity production for a long time and that the party after the election wants a new energy agreement through cross-bloc energy policy talks. The counter-proposal's demands for a broader fossil-free target, an earlier planning target and new cross-bloc talks answer these commitments. The goal of the world's first fossil-free welfare nation furthermore encompasses more than electricity production.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet säger uttryckligen att inga heliga kor gäller för Sveriges energibehov, att kärnkraften är en viktig del av elproduktionen under lång tid och att partiet efter valet vill ha en ny energiöverenskommelse genom blocköverskridande energipolitiska samtal. Motförslagets krav på ett bredare fossilfrihetsmål, ett tidigare planeringsmål och nya blocköverskridande samtal svarar mot dessa åtaganden. Målet om världens första fossilfria välfärdsnation omfattar dessutom mer än elproduktionen.
- cross-bloc energy talksdecisive»Efter valet vill vi se en ny energiöverenskommelse för Sveriges bästa, och vill därför föra energipolitiska samtal med andra partier om allt från vindkraft till kärnkraft.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“After the election we want to see a new energy agreement for Sweden's benefit, and therefore want to conduct energy policy talks with other parties on everything from wind power to nuclear power.”
- nuclear power has an ongoing role»Kärnkraften är en viktig del av svensk elproduktion och kommer att så vara under lång tid framöver.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Nuclear power is an important part of Swedish electricity production and will continue to be so for a long time to come.”
- fossil-free welfare nation»Sverige ska bli världens första fossilfria välfärdsnation.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden shall become the world's first fossil-free welfare nation.”
- technology-neutral energy policy»När det gäller att lösa Sveriges energibehov finns inga heliga kor.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“When it comes to solving Sweden's energy needs there are no sacred cows.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan's energy policy goal is one hundred percent renewable energy, and the party programme explicitly opposes building new reactors or increasing capacity in existing ones.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's energy policy goal is one hundred percent renewable energy, and the party programme explicitly opposes building new reactors or increasing capacity in existing ones. The counter-proposal certainly wants to expand the goal to the entire energy system, but is based on nuclear power being given a continued significant role in the energy mix, which the plan rejects.
Original (Swedish)
Planens energipolitiska mål är hundra procent förnybar energi, och partiprogrammet motsätter sig uttryckligen byggandet av nya reaktorer eller effekthöjning i befintliga. Motförslaget vill visserligen bredda målet till hela energisystemet, men bygger på att kärnkraften ges en fortsatt betydande roll i energimixen, vilket planen avvisar.
- no to new reactorsdecisive»byggandet av nya reaktorer i Sverige, eller« (party programme ↗)“building new reactors in Sweden, or”
- one hundred per cent renewable»100 procent förnybar energi« (2022 manifesto ↗)“100 per cent renewable energy”
- all energy shall become renewable»energikrävande standard och dels måste produktionen av förnybar energi öka så att andelen blir« (party programme ↗)“energy-intensive standard and partly renewable energy production must increase so that the share becomes”
- nuclear power expensive and risky»Kärnkraften tar minst 15 år att bygga, kräver hundratals miljarder av staten i investeringar och har enorma säkerhetsrisker.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Nuclear power takes at least 15 years to build, requires hundreds of billions in state investments and has enormous safety risks.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan wants to double zero-emission electricity production starting already during this term of office and simultaneously phase out fossil fuels and multiply biofuels and biogas, thus broadening the goal from electricity to the entire energy system.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to double zero-emission electricity production starting already during this term of office and simultaneously phase out fossil fuels and multiply biofuels and biogas, thus broadening the goal from electricity to the entire energy system. This is the core of the counter-proposal's demand for a fully fossil-free energy system and an earlier planning target with a view to doubling output. That nuclear power is given a continued significant role lies however in tension with the party programme's vision of a society without nuclear power.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill fördubbla produktionen av utsläppsfri el med start redan under mandatperioden och samtidigt fasa ut fossila bränslen och mångdubbla biobränslen och biogas, alltså bredda målet från el till hela energisystemet. Det är kärnan i motförslagets krav på ett fullt fossilfritt energisystem och ett tidigarelagt planeringsmål med sikte på en fördubbling. Att kärnkraften ges en fortsatt betydande roll ligger däremot i spänning med partiprogrammets vision om ett samhälle utan kärnkraft.
- doubled zero-emission electricitydecisive»Vi vill fördubbla produktionen av utsläppsfri el, och rusta och bygga ut elnätet. Minst 50 TWh utsläppsfri el måste börja byggas nästa mandatperiod.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to double zero-emission electricity production, and strengthen and expand the electricity grid. At least 50 TWh of zero-emission electricity must begin to be built in the next term of office.”
- fossil-free fuels, not just electricity»Sveriges energioberoende måste stärkas, bland annat genom att mångdubbla produktionen av biobränslen och biogas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden's energy independence must be strengthened, among other things by multiplying production of biofuels and biogas.”
- phase out fossil fuels»Vi vill stoppa all energihandel med Ryssland och fasa ut fossila bränslen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to stop all energy trade with Russia and phase out fossil fuels.”
- vision without nuclear power»där Centerpartiets vision är ett samhälle utan kärnkraft« (party programme ↗)“where the Centre Party's vision is a society without nuclear power”
The plan requires net zero by 2045 at the latest, that dependence on fossil fuels is broken throughout the transport sector and that electricity demand is doubled, which requires several new reactors.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires net zero by 2045 at the latest, that dependence on fossil fuels is broken throughout the transport sector and that electricity demand is doubled, which requires several new reactors. To broaden the target from pure electricity production to a fully fossil-free energy system with continued significant nuclear power and doubled production is precisely the direction the plan indicates. The counter-proposal's substantive requirements are thus supported.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver nettonoll senast 2045, att beroendet av fossila bränslen bryts i hela transportsektorn och att elbehovet fördubblas, vilket förutsätter fler nya reaktorer. Att bredda målet från ren elproduktion till ett fullt fossilfritt energisystem med fortsatt betydande kärnkraft och en fördubblad produktion är precis den inriktning planen anger. Motförslagets sakkrav stöds därför.
- doubled electricity demand and nuclear powerdecisive»Klimatomställningen kräver dubbelt så mycket el som i dag. Då kan vi inte avveckla kärnkraften.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Climate transition requires twice as much electricity as today. Then we cannot phase out nuclear power.”
- net zero 2045»Vi ska nå klimatmålen – inga nettoutsläpp av växthusgaser senast 2045 och därefter negativa utsläpp – inom ramen för en växande ekonomi.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We shall reach the climate targets – no net greenhouse gas emissions by 2045 at the latest and thereafter negative emissions – within the framework of a growing economy.”
- break fossil dependence»Beroendet av fossila bränslen måste brytas och alla transportslag måste stå för sina« (party programme ↗)“Dependence on fossil fuels must be broken and all modes of transport must account for their”
- nuclear power for the climate»Kärnkraften behövs för klimatets skull och för att minska världens utsläpp.« (party programme ↗)“Nuclear power is needed for the climate and to reduce the world's emissions.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The party programme requires that fossil fuels be phased out from both the energy and transport sectors, which is precisely the expansion from electricity to the entire energy system that the counter-proposal wants.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme requires that fossil fuels be phased out from both the energy and transport sectors, which is precisely the expansion from electricity to the entire energy system that the counter-proposal wants. The plan simultaneously wants to give nuclear power long-term conditions and build energy policy on fixed rules, which supports both nuclear power's role and cross-party talks.
Original (Swedish)
Principprogrammet kräver att fossilbränslena fasas ut ur både energi- och transportsektorn, vilket är just den breddning från el till hela energisystemet som motförslaget vill ha. Planen vill samtidigt ge kärnkraften långsiktiga villkor och bygga energipolitiken på fasta spelregler, vilket stöder både kärnkraftens roll och blocköverskridande samtal.
- fossil-free energy and transport systemdecisive»Fossilbränslena måste fasas ut från såväl energi- som« (party programme ↗)“Fossil fuels must be phased out from both energy and”
- nuclear power is given long-term conditions»Satsa på kärnkraften med långsiktiga villkor att utvecklas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Invest in nuclear power with long-term conditions to develop.”
- fixed rules in energy policy»Sveriges energiförsörjning ska tryggas genom en långsiktig energipolitik med fasta spelregler« (party programme ↗)“Sweden's energy supply shall be secured through long-term energy policy with fixed rules”
- sustainability, security, competitiveness»De tre grundpelarna för den svenska energipolitiken ska« (party programme ↗)“The three pillars of Swedish energy policy shall”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto explicitly wants to change the energy policy goal from 100 percent renewable to 100 percent fossil-free and give nuclear power a decisive role, among other things by removing the reactor cap.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto explicitly wants to change the energy policy goal from 100 percent renewable to 100 percent fossil-free and give nuclear power a decisive role, among other things by removing the reactor cap. The counter-proposal's requirement for a broader fossil-free energy system with continued significant nuclear power is the same direction. That electricity demand more than doubles by 2045 also lies behind the requirement for significantly increased production.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet vill uttryckligen ändra det energipolitiska målet från 100 procent förnybart till 100 procent fossilfritt och ge kärnkraften en avgörande roll, bland annat genom att ta bort reaktortaket. Motförslagets krav på ett bredare fossilfritt energisystem med fortsatt betydande kärnkraft är samma inriktning. Att elbehovet mer än fördubblas till 2045 ligger också bakom kravet på kraftigt ökad produktion.
- fossil-free instead of renewabledecisive»Ändra det energipolitiska målet från 100 procent förnybart till 100 procent fossilfritt« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Change the energy policy goal from 100 percent renewable to 100 percent fossil-free”
- expanded nuclear power»Ta bort förbudet mot att ha fler än tio kärnkraftsreaktorer i drift« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Remove the ban on having more than ten nuclear power reactors in operation”
- doubled electricity demand»Fram till 2045 kommer Sveriges elbehov mer än fördubblas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“By 2045, Sweden's electricity demand will more than double.”
- all fossil-free energy sources contribute»Ska vi klara det behövs en elproduktion där alla fossilfria energikällor är med och bidrar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“If we are to manage it, we need electricity production where all fossil-free energy sources are included and contribute.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan wants to set targets for becoming fossil-free and states that the energy sector should become fossil-free, with nuclear power as central and a roadmap for SMR reactors.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to set targets for becoming fossil-free and states that the energy sector should become fossil-free, with nuclear power as central and a roadmap for SMR reactors. The counter-proposal's demand for a broader fossil-free target for the entire energy system with continued significant nuclear power thus aligns with the plan. The demand for long-term stable rules corresponds to the plan's commitment to predictable policy for investments.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill sätta upp mål för fossilfrihet och slår fast att energisektorn ska bli fossilfri, med kärnkraften som central och en färdplan för SMR-reaktorer. Motförslagets krav på ett bredare fossilfrihetsmål för hela energisystemet med fortsatt betydande kärnkraft ligger därmed i linje med planen. Kravet på långsiktigt stabila spelregler motsvarar planens åtagande om en förutsägbar politik för investeringar.
- targets for becoming fossil-freedecisive»Sätta upp mål för fossilfrihet och att ett mål för leveranssäkerhet införs« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Set targets for becoming fossil-free and that a target for supply security is introduced”
- nuclear power's role»Skapa förutsättningar för ny kärnkraft i Sverige och en färdplan för byggandet av SMR-reaktorer« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Create conditions for new nuclear power in Sweden and a roadmap for building SMR reactors”
- fossil-free energy sector»energisektorn skall vara fossilfri« (party programme ↗)“the energy sector should be fossil-free”
- long-term rules»En förutsättning för att lönsamma investeringar ska kunna göras är en långsiktig politik som tar hänsyn till industrins behov av en förutsägbar process.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“A condition for profitable investments to be possible is a long-term policy that takes into account industry's need for a predictable process.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2023/24:NU14)
- Committee report full text (HB01NU14)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2023/24:1250 — Förnybar energiomställning av Martina Johansson och Mikael Larsson (båda C)
- Motion 2023/24:1281 — Långsiktigt hållbar energiförsörjning av Hanna Westerén (S)
- Motion 2023/24:13 — Riktlinjer för svensk energiförsörjning av Björn Tidland (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:1312 — Ekonomisk utvärdering av olika former av energiproduktion av Hanna Westerén (S)
- Motion 2023/24:1351 — Korttidsreglering av vattenkraft av Lars Isacsson (S)
- Motion 2023/24:1519 — En grön klimathandlingsplan för Sverige av Elin Söderberg m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2023/24:1527 — Ett miljövänligt, robust och konkurrenskraftigt energisystem av Linus Lakso m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2023/24:1572 — Energi av Adnan Dibrani och Jennie Nilsson (båda S)
- Motion 2023/24:1824 — Lagerhållning av elnätsstolpar i trä av Monica Haider (S)
- Motion 2023/24:1935 — Säkrad energiförsörjning genom samordning av Sofia Amloh m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:1991 — Rättvisa elpriser i södra Sverige av Jamal El-Haj m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:1994 — Förnybar energi till havs av Magnus Manhammar (S)
- Motion 2023/24:2056 — Inhemsk biodrivmedelsproduktion av Isak From och Monica Haider (båda S)
- Motion 2023/24:2240 — Tydligare handlingsplan för vätgas av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2023/24:2358 — Energipolitik för hela landet av Rose-Marie Carlsson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:2405 — Vindkraft av Lars Beckman (M)
- Motion 2023/24:2450 — En förstärkning av det civila försvaret och krisberedskapen av Emma Berginger m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2023/24:2453 — Ledarskap för klimat och grön omställning av Rickard Nordin m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2023/24:2456 — Krisberedskap och utveckling av militärt och civilt försvar av Mikael Larsson m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2023/24:2458 — En folkrörelse för klimatet av Muharrem Demirok m.fl. (C)
Source: The Swedish Parliament