2024-04-242023/24:UbU14 · p.1UbUEducation
Protect Academic Freedom
Safeguarding academic freedom at higher education institutions
What's at stake: How academic freedom is protected affects the independence and long-term stability of researchers and universities; a shorter term of office for boards and increased state control over competence requirements can, critics argue, increase political influence over higher education.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the government should actively take further measures to safeguard academic freedom, including in light of a shortened term of office for university boards, or whether the ongoing follow-up and evidence already under way are sufficient.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee does not want to preempt the ongoing work and notes that UKÄ's national survey and international outlook can provide a basis for assessing the need for further measures; the committee also agrees with the government's assessment that security expertise should be considered in nominations to university boards, and therefore rejects the motions.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 1 (S, V, MP)
The reservation holds that the government must take a clear stance in defence of academic freedom, be transparent, and give universities and researchers long-term stability; it argues that the government's sudden, unilateral decision to shorten the term of office for university boards constitutes a threat to academic freedom, and that seeking to control which expertise - and thereby indirectly which individuals - are considered for board positions is a departure from academic freedom.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by S, V, MP.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have gone the other way
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: CCenterpartiet, KDKristdemokraterna, LLiberalerna, MModeraterna, SDSverigedemokraterna
Ja 176–130Nej 1–305
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | No 0/21/0/3 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| S | No | No 0/92/0/14 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| MP | No | No 0/16/0/2 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
| C | No | Yes 22/0/0/2 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| L | No | Yes 14/0/0/2 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| KD | No | Yes 17/0/0/2 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| M | No | Yes 59/0/0/9 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| SD | No | Yes 63/0/0/9 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
Committee proposal
Parliament rejects the motions 2023/24:813 by Anna Vikström (S) item 2 and 2023/24:2687 by Åsa Westlund et al. (S) item 94.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2023/24:813 av Anna Vikström (S) yrkande 2 och 2023/24:2687 av Åsa Westlund m.fl. (S) yrkande 94.
Riksdag decision: Parliament voted against 130 proposals in motions about higher education from the general motion period of 2023. The motions deal with, for example, academic freedom, accessibility, and the sizing of educational programs. Parliament refers, among other things, to existing regulations and ongoing work.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants the government to clearly protect academic freedom and provide institutions with long-term conditions for their activities. (S, V, MP) — Reservation 1
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan wants to protect university independence and defends free fundamental research against attempts to control higher education.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to protect university independence and defends free fundamental research against attempts to control higher education. A clearer stance for academic freedom, with long-term conditions and criticism of political control of board composition and mandate periods, aligns with that commitment. The plan does not express itself on board forms, which is why the support is derived.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill värna universitetens oberoende och försvarar den fria grundforskningen mot försök att styra högskolan. Ett tydligare ställningstagande för akademisk frihet, med långsiktiga förutsättningar och kritik mot politisk styrning av styrelsernas sammansättning och mandatperioder, ligger i linje med det åtagandet. Planen uttalar sig inte om styrelseformerna, varför stödet är härlett.
- protect educational institutions' independencedecisive»Vänsterpartiet vill värna universitetens oberoende och finansiering och höja studiestödet så att fler kan välja att vidareutbilda sig.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Left Party wants to protect university independence and financing and raise study support so that more people can choose to further their education.”
- free fundamental research»Vänsterpartiet försvarar den fria grundforskningen.« (party programme ↗)“The Left Party defends free fundamental research.”
- opposition to control of higher education»Vänsterpartiet motsätter sig också alla försök att privatisera universitet och högskolor.« (party programme ↗)“The Left Party also opposes all attempts to privatize universities and higher education institutions.”
- resist political control of content»Vi lever i en tid då högerpopulistiska krafter försöker styra information och innehåll allt hårdare.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We live in a time when right-wing populist forces are trying to control information and content increasingly harder.”
The programme gives the state special responsibility to guarantee freedom of research, and sees the liberation of knowledge as a counterbalance against elites' striving to take power over thought.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The programme gives the state special responsibility to guarantee freedom of research, and sees the liberation of knowledge as a counterbalance against elites' striving to take power over thought. A clear position for academic freedom, with long-term and transparent conditions for institutions and without political steering of who can sit on boards, follows from this. The plan, however, does not address boards' mandates.
Original (Swedish)
Programmet ger staten ett särskilt ansvar att garantera forskningens frihet, och ser kunskapens frigörande kraft som en motvikt mot eliters strävan att ta makten över tanken. Ett tydligt ställningstagande för akademisk frihet, med långsiktiga och transparenta villkor för lärosätena och utan politisk styrning av vilka som kan sitta i styrelserna, följer av detta. Planen behandlar dock inte styrelsernas mandatperioder.
- guaranteed freedom of researchdecisive»ansvar att garantera forskningens frihet och att trygga grundforskningen.« (party programme ↗)“responsibility to guarantee freedom of research and to secure basic research.”
- knowledge as independent countervailing force»motvikt mot ekonomiska och sociala eliters strävan att ta makten över tanken.« (party programme ↗)“counterbalance against economic and social elites' striving to take power over thought.”
- knowledge as a tool for freedom»Kunskap och kultur är verktyg för människors personliga frihet och utveckling.« (party programme ↗)“Knowledge and culture are tools for people's personal freedom and development.”
The party programme states that academic freedom shall be protected and that educational institutions' independence and autonomy shall be developed in interaction with public transparency.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme states that academic freedom shall be protected and that educational institutions' independence and autonomy shall be developed in interaction with public transparency. Universities' and higher education institutions' freedom to shape their own activities must not be restricted by political priorities. Measures that shorten boards' terms or control competency requirements conflict with this, and therefore the counter-proposal's demands are supported.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår fast att den akademiska friheten ska värnas och att lärosätenas självständighet och oberoende ska utvecklas i samspel med offentlig insyn. Universitetens och högskolornas frihet att själva utforma sin verksamhet får inte inskränkas av politiska prioriteringar. Åtgärder som kortar styrelsernas mandatperioder eller styr kompetenskraven strider mot detta, och motförslagets krav stöds därför.
- academic freedom shall be protecteddecisive»Den akademiska friheten ska värnas och« (party programme ↗)“Academic freedom shall be protected and”
- educational institutions' independence»Lärosätenas självständighet och oberoende ska« (party programme ↗)“Educational institutions' independence and autonomy shall”
- freedom to shape activities»Detta får dock inte gå ut över grundforskningen eller universitetens och högskolornas« (party programme ↗)“This must not, however, come at the expense of basic research or universities' and higher education institutions'”
- free research»Forskningen ska vara fri, men det är rimligt att en« (party programme ↗)“Research shall be free, but it is reasonable that a”
The plan states that academic freedom is a cornerstone and that policy should contribute to good conditions but keep an arm's length distance, and that free institutions of higher education must independently conduct research and education.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that academic freedom is a cornerstone and that policy should contribute to good conditions but keep an arm's length distance, and that free institutions of higher education must independently conduct research and education. The counter-proposal's criticism of shortened board terms and steered competence requirements is exactly an application of that principle. The plan explicitly wants to see a Sweden where academia is free.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att den akademiska friheten är en grundbult och att politiken ska bidra till goda förutsättningar men hålla armlängds avstånd, samt att fria lärosäten självständigt ska bedriva forskning och utbildning. Motförslagets kritik mot förkortade styrelsemandat och styrda kompetenskrav är just en tillämpning av den principen. Planen vill uttryckligen se ett Sverige där akademin är fri.
- academic freedom as cornerstonedecisive»Den akademiska och konstnärliga friheten liksom den fria kulturen är grundbultar i ett vitalt civilsamhälle.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Academic and artistic freedom as well as free culture are cornerstones of vital civil society.”
- arm's length distance»Politiken ska bidra till goda förutsättningar men hålla armlängds avstånd.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Policy must contribute to good conditions but keep an arm's length distance.”
- institutions' independence»Högre utbildning och fria lärosäten ska självständigt kunna bedriva högkvalitativ forskning och utbildning.« (party programme ↗)“Higher education and free institutions of higher education must be able to independently conduct high-quality research and education.”
- free academia»ett Sverige där kulturen, medierna och akademin är fri« (2022 manifesto ↗)“a Sweden where culture, media and academia are free”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The election manifesto requires that academic freedom is given constitutional protection, and the party programme makes individual academic freedom a guiding principle and wants state-funded institutions to be given greater autonomy from executive power.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto requires that academic freedom is given constitutional protection, and the party programme makes individual academic freedom a guiding principle and wants state-funded institutions to be given greater autonomy from executive power. The counter-proposal's demands for a clearer stance on academic freedom and criticism of political control of board composition and mandates follow directly from this.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet kräver att den akademiska friheten ges skydd i grundlagen, och partiprogrammet gör individuell akademisk frihet till en bärande princip och vill ge statliga lärosäten större autonomi från regeringsmakten. Motförslagets krav på ett tydligare ställningstagande för akademisk frihet och kritik mot politisk styrning av styrelsernas sammansättning och mandatperioder följer direkt av detta.
- constitutional protection for academic freedomdecisive»Den akademiska friheten ska ges skydd i grundlagen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Academic freedom shall be given constitutional protection.”
- academic freedom as guiding principle»Individuell akademisk frihet ska vara en bärande princip för all offentlig verksamhet inom« (party programme ↗)“Individual academic freedom shall be a guiding principle for all public activity within”
- autonomy from executive power»lärosäten ska ges en ny myndighetsform, som ger större autonomi från regeringsmakten.« (party programme ↗)“institutions shall be given a new agency form, which gives greater autonomy from executive power.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The party programme establishes that freedom of thought is a prerequisite for successful knowledge-seeking and that universities and colleges shall enjoy a large degree of self-determination in relation to the state, including the ability to shape their own admission criteria.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme establishes that freedom of thought is a prerequisite for successful knowledge-seeking and that universities and colleges shall enjoy a large degree of self-determination in relation to the state, including the ability to shape their own admission criteria. State control over who can come into question for board positions and shortened mandate periods restricts that self-determination. The counter-proposal's demand to safeguard academic freedom follows directly from the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår fast att tankens frihet är en förutsättning för framgångsrikt kunskapssökande och att universitet och högskolor ska åtnjuta ett stort mått av självbestämmande i förhållande till staten, inklusive att själva utforma sina antagningskriterier. Statlig styrning av vilka som kan komma i fråga för styrelseuppdrag och kortade mandatperioder inskränker det självbestämmandet. Motförslagets krav på att värna den akademiska friheten följer direkt av planen.
- institutions of higher education's self-determinationdecisive»högskolor ska åtnjuta stort mått av självbestämmande i förhållande till staten« (party programme ↗)“colleges shall enjoy a large degree of self-determination in relation to the state”
- freedom of thought»Tankens frihet är en förutsättning« (party programme ↗)“Freedom of thought is a prerequisite”
- institutions of higher education's own decision-making authority»Vidare ska det finnas stora möjligheter för enskilda universitet och högskolor att själva utforma antagningskriterierna till utbildningarna« (party programme ↗)“Furthermore, there shall be ample opportunities for individual universities and colleges to themselves shape admission criteria for programmes”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The election manifesto establishes that academic freedom must be better protected and that research shall be free from political interference, and explicitly promises to protect free research.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto establishes that academic freedom must be better protected and that research shall be free from political interference, and explicitly promises to protect free research. The counter-proposal's demand for a clearer stance on academic freedom and the criticism of politically directed competence requirements and shortened terms for university boards lies directly in line with this. The plan therefore supports the demand.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet slår fast att den akademiska friheten måste värnas bättre och att forskningen ska stå fri från politiska pekpinnar, och lovar uttryckligen att värna den fria forskningen. Motförslagets krav på ett tydligare ställningstagande för akademisk frihet och kritiken mot politiskt styrda kompetenskrav och kortade mandatperioder för lärosätenas styrelser ligger direkt i linje med detta. Planen stöder därför kravet.
- protect academic freedomdecisive»Vi måste bättre värna den akademiska friheten i Sverige och se till att forskningen står fri från politiska pekpinnar och möjliggöra banbrytande forskningsresultat.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We must better protect academic freedom in Sweden and ensure that research is free from political interference and enable groundbreaking research results.”
- no political interference»Värna den fria forskningen från politiska pekpinnar« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Protect free research from political interference”
- quality and high standards»Högre utbildning ska präglas av kvalitet samt höga krav och förväntningar på studenter och forskare.« (party programme ↗)“Higher education shall be characterised by quality and high standards and expectations on students and researchers.”
- independent institutions»Starka självständiga samhällsinstitutioner bidrar till att balansera makten i samhället.« (party programme ↗)“Strong independent societal institutions contribute to balancing power in society.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The election manifesto explicitly requires that political governance of higher education be reduced and that academic independence increase, and directs criticism at political governance and ideologically influenced value bases characterizing research and academia.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto explicitly requires that political governance of higher education be reduced and that academic independence increase, and directs criticism at political governance and ideologically influenced value bases characterizing research and academia. The counter-proposal's demand for a clearer protection of academic freedom, with criticism of governance of board composition and terms of office, directly aligns with this.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet kräver uttryckligen att den politiska styrningen av högre utbildning minskar och att akademins självständighet ökar, och riktar kritik mot att politisk styrning och ideologiska värdegrunder präglar forskning och akademi. Motförslagets krav på ett tydligare värnande av den akademiska friheten, med kritik mot styrning av styrelsernas sammansättning och mandatperioder, ligger direkt i linje med detta.
- decreased political governancedecisive»Den politiska styrningen av högre utbildning ska minska och akademins självständighet öka.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Political governance of higher education shall decrease and academic independence shall increase.”
- academic independence»Slå vakt om den högre akademins självständighet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Guard the independence of higher academia”
- criticism of governed academia»Allvarlig kritik har riktats mot att politisk styrning och ideologiskt präglade värdegrunder i hög grad präglar forskning och akademi.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Serious criticism has been directed at political governance and ideologically influenced value bases to a high degree characterizing research and academia.”
- protection for free opinion formation»Varje journalists, konstutövares och medborgares rätt att uttrycka sig fritt utan att utsättas för hot eller repressalier ska värnas och stärkas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Every journalist's, artist's and citizen's right to express themselves freely without being subjected to threats or retaliation shall be protected and strengthened.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2023/24:UbU14)
- Committee report full text (HB01UbU14)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2023/24:1077 — En ny tandläkarutbildning av Carina Ödebrink m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:1112 — Avskilja brottslingar från utbildning av Boriana Åberg (M)
- Motion 2023/24:1144 — Avtal med Storbritannien om svenska studenters studieavgifter av Boriana Åberg (M)
- Motion 2023/24:1190 — Värdighet för äldre och professionalisering av äldreomsorgen av Markus Wiechel (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:1216 — Utveckla studenthälsan av Stina Larsson (C)
- Motion 2023/24:1339 — Campusförlagda utbildningsplatser på Mittuniversitetet i Sundsvall av Peder Björk och Malin Larsson (båda S)
- Motion 2023/24:1342 — Tillträde till universitet och högskolor av Niklas Karlsson och Adrian Magnusson (båda S)
- Motion 2023/24:1359 — Högre utbildning för hela landet av Lars Isacsson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:1442 — Lämplighetstest för lärarutbildningen av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2023/24:1461 — Bättre matchning inför framtida yrkesval av Markus Wiechel och Alexander Christiansson (båda SD)
- Motion 2023/24:1563 — Inrättande av utbildningstjänst för studenter i lärarprogram av Adnan Dibrani m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:1644 — Ombildning av Högskolan i Borås till universitet av Stina Larsson och Mikael Larsson (båda C)
- Motion 2023/24:1693 — Förbättrade förutsättningar för validering av utländska läkarutbildningar av Johan Büser och Dzenan Cisija (båda S)
- Motion 2023/24:1715 — Fler utbildningsplatser till avancerad specialistsjuksköterska av Margareta Cederfelt (M)
- Motion 2023/24:1725 — Högskolan i Skövde av Ida Ekeroth Clausson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:178 — Kost-, nutritions- och näringslära för sjukvårdspersonal av Markus Wiechel (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:179 — Meritpoäng för genomförd värnplikt av Markus Wiechel (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:1839 — Teckenspråk av Carita Boulwén (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:1845 — Jönköping University som universitet av Carina Ödebrink m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:1908 — Jämlik fördelning av högre utbildning i hela landet av Linnéa Wickman m.fl. (S)
Source: The Swedish Parliament