2024-01-312023/24:SfU8 · p.1SfUMigration & social insurance

Revocation of residence permit

Revocation of residence permits on security grounds

What's at stake: The issue concerns people holding residence permits who could be affected by revocation, and the balance between authorities' ability to act early against security threats and an individual's right to a clear, verifiable basis for such a decision.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is whether to adopt the legislative change broadening the grounds for revoking a residence permit on security grounds - including suspected links to terrorism or state-directed corporate espionage - or whether the evidentiary threshold in the proposal is set too low to meet legal-certainty requirements.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee agrees with the government's assessment that the framework for security cases needs to become more fit for purpose and that a residence permit should be revocable in cases of suspected state-directed corporate espionage or links to terrorism, since authorities need to be able to act at an early stage against activity that threatens Sweden's security.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 1 (V, MP)

The reservation (V, MP) considers the proposal to fall short on legal certainty and to risk increasing the number of permits revoked on grounds that are hard to verify, which constitutes a serious intrusion into personal privacy; what counts as a link to terrorism must be defined more clearly, and it therefore wants the relevant provision of the Aliens Act rejected.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: adopting the government's legislative proposal and rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by V, MP.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
Vown reservationNoNo 0/20/0/4follows the planconfidence: highderived
SYesYes 94/0/0/13follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
MPown reservationNoNo 0/15/0/3follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
CNoYes 21/0/0/3departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
LNoYes 13/0/0/3departs from the planconfidence: lowderived
KDYesYes 16/0/0/3follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
MYesYes 60/0/0/8follows the planconfidence: highexplicit
SDYesYes 63/0/0/9follows the planconfidence: highexplicit

Committee proposal

Parliament adopts the government's proposal for an act amending the Aliens Act (2005:716) in the parts relating to chapter 7, section 3. Thus Parliament approves proposition 2023/24:36 in this part and rejects motions 2023/24:2777 by Tony Haddou et al. (V) and 2023/24:2782 by Annika Hirvonen et al. (MP).

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen antar regeringens förslag till lag om ändring i utlänningslagen (2005:716) i de delar det avser 7 kap. 3 §. Därmed bifaller riksdagen proposition 2023/24:36 i denna del och avslår motionerna 2023/24:2777 av Tony Haddou m.fl. (V) och 2023/24:2782 av Annika Hirvonen m.fl. (MP).

Riksdag decision: An alien's travel document – which in certain cases can be issued to someone who does not have a passport and also has no possibility of obtaining one – shall be able to be revoked for security reasons. Parliament approved the government's proposal. Furthermore, a residence permit shall be able to be revoked if it can be assumed that the person will conduct state-controlled corporate espionage or activity related to terrorism. The purpose is to prevent threats to Sweden's security. The legislative changes enter into force on 1 March 2024.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoNofollows the planderived

The plan rejects special legislation against terrorism, demands that crimes be prosecuted within ordinary legal frameworks and stands guard over a broad private sphere protected on principled grounds.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan rejects special legislation against terrorism, demands that crimes be prosecuted within ordinary legal frameworks and stands guard over a broad private sphere protected on principled grounds. Being able to withdraw residence permits on grounds that are difficult to verify is such an incursion the plan opposes, and the plan furthermore demands secure permanent residence permits. The counter-proposal's demands for legal certainty and clearer definitions therefore follow the plan.

Original (Swedish)

Planen avvisar särlagstiftning mot terrorism, kräver att brott lagförs inom ordinarie rättsramar och slår vakt om en bred privat sfär som skyddas på principiell grund. Att kunna återkalla uppehållstillstånd på grunder som är svåra att verifiera är ett sådant ingrepp planen motsätter sig, och planen kräver dessutom trygga permanenta uppehållstillstånd. Motförslagets krav på rättssäkerhet och tydligare definitioner följer därför planen.

  • ordinary legal frameworksdecisive»avvisar en särskild terroristlagstiftning och menar att våldsbrott ska« (party programme ↗)“rejects special terrorist legislation and means that violent crimes should”
  • protection for personal integrity»som skyddas på praktisk och principiell grund. Växande övervakning« (party programme ↗)“which is protected on practical and principled grounds. Growing surveillance”
  • against conditional residence permits»Vänsterpartiet anser att den inhumana flyktingpolitik som råder, med tillfälliga och villkorade uppehållstillstånd, är en form av psykologiskt våld mot en redan utsatt grupp.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Left Party considers the inhuman refugee policy that exists, with temporary and conditional residence permits, to be a form of psychological violence against an already vulnerable group.”
  • permanent residence permits»Rätten att söka asyl kan aldrig tummas på, vi kräver att endast permanenta uppehållstillstånd ska utfärdas vid beviljad asyl.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The right to seek asylum can never be compromised, we demand that only permanent residence permits shall be issued for granted asylum.”
SSocialdemokraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan explicitly identifies espionage and hybrid attacks as threats that Sweden must be able to defend against, and it maintains a tightened immigration policy.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan explicitly identifies espionage and hybrid attacks as threats that Sweden must be able to defend against, and it maintains a tightened immigration policy. The counter-proposal wants to prevent the proposed revocation possibility until the concepts are defined more clearly, which opposes the plan's requirement for capacity to act against state-sponsored espionage. The plan's protection of personal integrity points to strict criteria rather than abstention.

Original (Swedish)

Planen pekar uttryckligen ut spionage och hybridattacker som hot som Sverige måste kunna försvara sig mot, och den håller fast vid en åtstramad migrationspolitik. Motförslaget vill hindra den föreslagna återkallelsemöjligheten till dess begreppen definierats tydligare, vilket motverkar planens krav på förmåga att agera mot statsstyrt spioneri. Planens skydd för den personliga integriteten pekar mot noggranna kriterier snarare än mot att avstå.

  • defence against espionagedecisive»Vi måste kunna försvara oss militärt, men också mot hybridattacker, spionage och cyberangrepp.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We must be able to defend ourselves militarily, but also against hybrid attacks, espionage and cyber attacks.”
  • fixed strict immigration line»Vi har stramat åt migrationspolitiken, och denna linje ligger fast.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We have tightened immigration policy, and this line is fixed.”
  • strengthened intelligence capacity»Vi vill fortsätta internationella samarbeten och utveckla cyberförsvaret och underrättelseförmågan.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to continue international cooperation and develop cyber defence and intelligence capacity.”
  • protection of integrity»Det är samhällets absoluta skyldighet att skydda friheten och den personliga integriteten« (party programme ↗)“It is society's absolute duty to protect freedom and personal integrity”
MPMiljöpartietNoNofollows the planderived

The plan values people's right to privacy and private life and opposes laws that entail disproportionate intrusions on privacy.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan values people's right to privacy and private life and opposes laws that entail disproportionate intrusions on privacy. It also requires that anyone seeking protection be guaranteed a legally secure examination and that legal security in the migration process be strengthened. A ground for revocation resting on difficult-to-verify circumstances and undefined terror connections runs counter to these commitments, which is why the requirement for clearer definition and better legal security is supported.

Original (Swedish)

Planen värnar människors rätt till integritet och privatliv och motsätter sig lagar som innebär oproportionerliga ingrepp i integriteten. Den kräver också att den som söker skydd garanteras en rättssäker prövning och att rättssäkerheten i migrationsprocessen stärks. En återkallelsegrund som vilar på svårverifierade omständigheter och odefinierad terrorkoppling går emot dessa åtaganden, varför kravet på tydligare definition och bättre rättssäkerhet stöds.

  • safeguarded personal privacydecisive»Vi vill värna människors rätt till integritet och« (party programme ↗)“We wish to safeguard people's right to privacy and”
  • against disproportionate intrusions»alla lagar som innebär oproportionerliga ingrepp i« (party programme ↗)“all laws that entail disproportionate intrusions into”
  • legal security in migration process»stärka rättssäkerheten i asylprocessen och stödet för hbtqi-flyktingar och andra sårbara grupper.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“strengthen legal security in the asylum process and support for LGBTQ refugees and other vulnerable groups.”
  • legally secure examination»flyktingar ska garanteras en rättssäker asylprocess i« (party programme ↗)“refugees shall be guaranteed a legally secure asylum process in”

flags: citat_migrerat

CCenterpartietNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The party programme makes respect for personal integrity a cornerstone and requires that all legislation be tested against integrity and that any restriction is proportionate to its purpose.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The party programme makes respect for personal integrity a cornerstone and requires that all legislation be tested against integrity and that any restriction is proportionate to its purpose. The election manifesto wants to defend the rule of law and the individual's rights against the state. A revocation ground resting on difficult-to-verify suspicions and an undefined terrorism link hits precisely that assessment. The plan therefore supports the demand for clearer definition and strengthened legal certainty.

Original (Swedish)

Partiprogrammet gör respekten för den personliga integriteten till en grundsten och kräver att all lagstiftning prövas mot integriteten samt att inskränkningen står i proportion till syftet. Valmanifestet vill försvara rättsstaten och individens rättigheter gentemot staten. Ett återkallelsegrund som vilar på svårverifierade misstankar och en odefinierad terrorismkoppling träffar precis den prövningen. Planen stöder därför kravet på tydligare definition och stärkt rättssäkerhet.

  • integrity review of legislationweak support»All lagstiftning bör prövas mot dess påverkan på människors personliga integritet.« (party programme ↗)“All legislation should be tested against its impact on people's personal integrity.”
  • personal integrity as cornerstonedecisive»Respekten för den enskildes personliga integritet är en grundsten i varje demokrati.« (party programme ↗)“Respect for the individual's personal integrity is a cornerstone in every democracy.”
  • proportionality in restrictions»Det måste finnas en proportionalitet mellan lagstiftningens inskränkning av medborgarnas integritet och lagarnas syfte.« (party programme ↗)“There must be proportionality between legislation's restriction of citizens' integrity and the purpose of the laws.”
  • rule of law defended»Rättsstaten och individens rättigheter gentemot staten måste försvaras.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The rule of law and the individual's rights against the state must be defended.”

flags: citat_svagt

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

LLiberalernaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan requires that integrity-infringing measures are carefully tested, that all new bills are analysed from an integrity perspective, and that legal certainty is strengthened.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan requires that integrity-infringing measures are carefully tested, that all new bills are analysed from an integrity perspective, and that legal certainty is strengthened. The counter-proposal does not require that security matters are left untouched but that the concept of connection to terrorism is defined more clearly and that legal certainty is maintained, which follows from these commitments. At the same time, the plan wants Sweden to act without naivety regarding foreign powers' influence, which is why security in the conclusion is low.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver att integritetsingripande åtgärder prövas noga, att alla nya lagförslag analyseras ur integritetssynpunkt och att rättssäkerheten förstärks. Motförslaget kräver inte att säkerhetsärenden lämnas orörda utan att begreppet koppling till terrorism definieras tydligare och att rättssäkerheten hålls, vilket följer av dessa åtaganden. Samtidigt vill planen att Sverige agerar utan naivitet mot främmande makts påverkan, varför säkerheten i slutsatsen är låg.

  • integrity testing of billsdecisive»Alla nya lagförslag ska analyseras ur integritetssynpunkt.« (party programme ↗)“All new bills shall be analysed from an integrity perspective.”
  • protection for integrity»Skyddet för den enskildes integritet ska stärkas.« (party programme ↗)“Protection for the individual's integrity shall be strengthened.”
  • strengthened legal certainty»Rättssäkerheten och skyddet för de medborgerliga fri- och rättigheterna behöver förstärkas.« (party programme ↗)“Legal certainty and protection for citizens' civil freedoms and rights need to be strengthened.”
  • no naivety towards foreign powers»dra nytta av frihandelns fördelar utan den naivitet som alltför länge uppvisats för kinesisk och rysk maktpolitik« (2022 manifesto ↗)“take advantage of free trade's benefits without the naivety that has been displayed for too long towards Chinese and Russian power politics”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

KDKristdemokraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan requires that Sweden can meet attacks from international crime and terrorism and that security policy is characterized by foresight, which presupposes that authorities can act early against activities that threaten national security.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan requires that Sweden can meet attacks from international crime and terrorism and that security policy is characterized by foresight, which presupposes that authorities can act early against activities that threaten national security. The election manifesto also requires a strict migration policy. The counter-proposal wants to slow down the legislative change; the plan's integrity protection justifies clear criteria but not that the possibility should be abandoned.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver att Sverige kan möta angrepp från internationell kriminalitet och terrorism och att säkerhetspolitiken präglas av förutseende, vilket förutsätter att myndigheter kan agera tidigt mot verksamhet som hotar landets säkerhet. Valmanifestet kräver dessutom en stram migrationspolitik. Motförslaget vill bromsa lagändringen; planens integritetsskydd motiverar tydliga kriterier men inte att möjligheten uteblir.

  • meet terrorism and foreign threatsdecisive»möta angrepp från internationell kriminalitet, terrorism, cyberkrigföring« (party programme ↗)“meet attacks from international crime, terrorism, cyber warfare”
  • strict migration policy»Stram migrationspolitik krävs för att ta itu med integrationsproblem och utanförskap.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strict migration policy is required to address integration problems and exclusion.”
  • foresight security policy»Sveriges säkerhetspolitik ska präglas av samarbete, förutseende och helhetslösningar« (party programme ↗)“Sweden's security policy shall be characterized by cooperation, foresight and comprehensive solutions”
  • protection of personal integrity»Den personliga integriteten ska ha ett starkt« (party programme ↗)“Personal integrity shall have a strong”
MModeraternaYesYesfollows the planexplicit

The plan commits to deporting foreign citizens who commit crimes at the prison level and gang members even without conviction, and to strengthening protection against espionage and theft attempts by foreign powers.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan commits to deporting foreign citizens who commit crimes at the prison level and gang members even without conviction, and to strengthening protection against espionage and theft attempts by foreign powers. That agencies should be able to act early against security threats is thus the plan's line. The counter-proposal's requirement to narrow and delay the legal change in the name of legal certainty is rejected by the plan.

Original (Swedish)

Planen åtar sig att utvisa utländska medborgare som begår brott på fängelsenivå och gängmedlemmar även utan fällande dom, samt att stärka skyddet mot spionage och stöldförsök från främmande makt. Att myndigheter ska kunna agera tidigt mot säkerhetshot är därmed planens linje. Motförslagets krav på att snäva in och skjuta upp lagändringen i rättssäkerhetens namn avvisas av planen.

  • deportation for crimedecisive»Utvisa den som har medborgarskap i annat land och begår brott på fängelsenivå« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Deport those who hold citizenship in another country and commit crimes at the prison level”
  • deportation without conviction»Utvisa gängmedlemmar, som inte är svenska medborgare, oavsett om de dömts för brott« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Deport gang members, who are not Swedish citizens, regardless of whether they have been convicted of crime”
  • protection against state espionage»Ge företag som är engagerade i säkerhetskänslig verksamhet bättre stöd från staten att kunna möta cyberattacker, spionage och stöldförsök från främmande makt« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Give companies engaged in security-sensitive activities better support from the state to be able to meet cyberattacks, espionage and theft attempts by foreign powers”
  • strengthened security service»Stärka Säkerhetspolisen för att öka deras förmåga att skydda den liberala demokratin och landets alla medborgare« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen the Security Police to increase their ability to protect liberal democracy and the country's people”
SDSverigedemokraternaYesYesfollows the planexplicit

The plan requires that the thresholds for taking into custody and expelling persons be lowered and that the aliens act be tightened to the strictest possible level.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan requires that the thresholds for taking into custody and expelling persons be lowered and that the aliens act be tightened to the strictest possible level. Security threats shall be monitored and expelled, with strict restrictions and detention. The counter-proposal's demand for narrower and clearer grounds would limit the possibility of withdrawing permission early and thus goes against the plan.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver att trösklarna för att ta i förvar och utvisa personer sänks och att utlänningslagen skärps till striktast möjliga nivå. Säkerhetshot ska kontrolleras och utvisas, med hårda restriktioner och förvar. Motförslagets krav på snävare och tydligare grunder skulle begränsa möjligheten att återkalla tillstånd tidigt och går därmed emot planen.

  • lowered thresholds for expulsiondecisive»Trösklarna för att ta i förvar och utvisa personer samt verkställa utvisningar behöver också sänkas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The thresholds for taking into custody and expelling persons as well as implementing expulsions also need to be lowered.”
  • strictest aliens act»Skärpa reglerna i utlänningslagen till striktas möjliga nivå enligt EU-rätten« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Tighten the rules in the aliens act to the strictest possible level according to EU law”
  • expulsion of security threats»De säkerhetshot som verkar inom dessa miljöer ska kontrolleras, och utvisas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The security threats that operate in these environments shall be monitored and expelled.”
  • detention for security threats»Införa hårda restriktioner och förvar för säkerhetshot som befinner sig i Sverige.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Introduce strict restrictions and detention for security threats that are in Sweden.”

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament