2025-06-042024/25:UbU11 · p.5UbUEducation
Safety and security
Safety and security in schools - support for staff who intervene
What's at stake: The decision affects how secure school staff can feel when intervening against pupils who break rules, and therefore how willing they are to actually step in - which in turn affects the safety of other pupils.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the Education Act needs to be changed to give school staff clearer legal backing when they intervene against disruptive behaviour, or whether the reform work and guidance already under way are enough, as favoured by the committee.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee points to the active work already under way to strengthen safety and security in schools, including through legislative changes, state grants, and guidance from the National Agency for Education on staff's powers, and does not want to pre-empt this reform work. The committee therefore rejects the motion.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 9 (SD)
The reserving party (SD) argues that school staff currently must judge in the moment whether an intervention against a disruption is proportionate, risking a complaint from the pupil, which makes too many reluctant to step in. The party wants the government to consider changes to the Education Act that give staff who intervene against rule violations clear legal backing.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 9 by SD.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have gone the other way
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: LLiberalerna, MModeraterna, SSocialdemokraterna
Ja 239–63Nej 72–230
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | Yes | Yes 20/0/0/4 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| S | No | Yes 93/0/0/13 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| MP | Yes | Yes 15/0/0/3 | match | confidence: low | not addressed |
| C | No | Yes 21/0/0/3 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 13/0/0/3 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| KD | No | Yes 16/0/0/3 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| M | No | Yes 61/0/0/7 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| SD | No | No 0/63/0/9 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2024/25:1444 by Patrick Reslow et al. (SD) demand 10, 2024/25:1677 by Ludvig Ceimertz and Ann-Charlotte Hammar Johnsson (both M) and 2024/25:2290 by Fredrik Kärrholm (M).
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2024/25:1444 av Patrick Reslow m.fl. (SD) yrkande 10, 2024/25:1677 av Ludvig Ceimertz och Ann-Charlotte Hammar Johnsson (båda M) och 2024/25:2290 av Fredrik Kärrholm (M).
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected approximately 130 proposals in motions on teachers and students. The proposals were submitted during the general motion period 2024 and address, among other things, school personnel, safety and security, student health and students with special needs. The Riksdag refers to existing regulations, ongoing work and measures taken in these areas.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to change school law to provide legal protection for school staff intervening against rule violations. (SD) — Reservation 9
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan's response to insecurity in school is resources and preventive work, not expanded intervention powers.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's response to insecurity in school is resources and preventive work, not expanded intervention powers. The election manifesto explicitly opposes lifting repression and tougher measures as solutions instead of tackling the problems seriously. The counter-proposal demands clearer legal basis for staff intervening against pupils, which is the repressive path the plan rejects in favour of better resources for schools and social services.
Original (Swedish)
Planens svar på otrygghet i skolan är resurser och förebyggande arbete, inte utvidgade ingripandebefogenheter. Valmanifestet vänder sig uttryckligen mot att repression och hårdare tag lyfts fram som lösning i stället för att problemen angrips på allvar. Motförslaget kräver tydligare lagstöd för personal som ingriper mot elever, vilket är den repressiva väg planen avvisar till förmån för bättre resurser till skola och socialtjänst.
- against repression as solutiondecisive»Alltför ofta lyfts repression och hårdare tag upp som lösningar istället för att ta itu med problemen på allvar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Too often repression and tougher measures are put forward as solutions instead of tackling the problems seriously.”
- resources for schools and social services»Skola och fritidsverksamheter behöver ges bättre resurser, likaså socialtjänsten.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Schools and leisure activities need better resources, as does social services.”
- thoughtful people-perspective against crime»Vägen till ett samhälle med låg brottslighet går genom en genomtänkt« (party programme ↗)“The path to a society with low crime goes through thoughtful”
- carefully designed sanctions»Straff och andra påföljder för brott behöver vara noggrant« (party programme ↗)“Punishment and other sanctions for crime need to be carefully”
The election manifesto explicitly states that teachers and other staff should be able to immediately intervene in disruptions and unrest, which is precisely what the counter-proposal wants to give clear legal support for.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto explicitly states that teachers and other staff should be able to immediately intervene in disruptions and unrest, which is precisely what the counter-proposal wants to give clear legal support for. The party programme elevates study peace and safety in schools as a policy goal. The plan thus directly supports clarifying staff authority in cases of order disturbances.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet slår uttryckligen fast att lärare och annan personal omedelbart ska kunna ingripa vid stök och oro, vilket är precis vad motförslaget vill ge tydligt lagstöd för. Partiprogrammet lyfter studiero och trygghet i skolorna som ett mål för politiken. Planen talar därmed direkt för att personalens befogenheter vid ordningsstörningar ska klargöras.
- staff should be able to intervenedecisive»Lärare och annan personal i skolan ska omedelbart kunna ingripa vid stök och oro.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Teachers and other school staff should be able to immediately intervene in disruptions and unrest.”
- stop to disruptions in classrooms»Stoppa stöket i klassrummen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Stop disruptions in classrooms.”
- study peace and safety»Studiero och trygghet i skolorna.« (party programme ↗)“Study peace and safety in schools.”
- safety-creating work is prioritised»Rätt till trygg närmiljö för alla, prioritering av trygghetsskapande arbete.« (party programme ↗)“Right to a safe local environment for all, prioritisation of safety-creating work.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan builds school safety on trustful relationships, strengthened student welfare and preventive work, not on expanded intervention authority for staff.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan builds school safety on trustful relationships, strengthened student welfare and preventive work, not on expanded intervention authority for staff. It also rejects that politics details and controls the teacher's work. The counter-proposal's demand for clearer legal basis for intervention against disruptions therefore lacks grounding in the plan's commitments.
Original (Swedish)
Planen bygger tryggheten i skolan på förtroendefulla relationer, förstärkt elevhälsa och förebyggande arbete, inte på utökade ingripandebefogenheter för personalen. Den avvisar dessutom att politiken detaljstyr och kontrollerar pedagogens arbete. Motförslagets krav på tydligare lagstöd vid ingripanden mot ordningsstörningar saknar därför förankring i planens åtaganden.
- safety through relationshipsdecisive»Skolan ska präglas av förtroendefulla relationer« (party programme ↗)“School shall be characterised by trustful relationships”
- safety through student welfare»förstärka elevhälsan och satsa på fler skolsköterskor, specialpedagoger, psykologer och kuratorer i skolan.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“strengthen student welfare and invest in more school nurses, special educators, psychologists and counsellors in schools.”
- prevention before intervention»Det brottsförebyggande arbetet är grunden för ett tryggt samhälle med låg kriminalitet.« (party programme ↗)“Crime prevention work is the foundation of a safe society with low criminality.”
- no detailed control of teachers»Politikens uppgift är inte att detaljstyra och kontrollera pedagogen i dennes arbete.« (party programme ↗)“Politics' task is not to detail and control the teacher in their work.”
The election manifesto explicitly sets order in the classroom and a safe school as goals and highlights teachers' and principals' role as decisive.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto explicitly sets order in the classroom and a safe school as goals and highlights teachers' and principals' role as decisive. The counter-proposal's requirement for clear legal support for staff intervening in disciplinary disturbances serves the same commitment and relieves the profession. The plan does not address authorization rules in detail, so the position is derived.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet ställer uttryckligen upp ordning i klassrummet och en trygg skola som mål och lyfter lärarnas och rektorernas roll som avgörande. Motförslagets krav på tydligt lagstöd för personal som ingriper vid ordningsstörningar tjänar samma åtagande och avlastar professionen. Planen behandlar inte befogenhetsreglerna i detalj, varför ställningstagandet är härlett.
- order in the classroomdecisive»Skolan ska förbättras i hela landet, med ordning i klassrummet och skolpolitiken« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Schools shall be improved throughout the country, with order in the classroom and school policy”
- safe school»Skolan ska vara en trygg plats — fri från rasism, homofobi och trakasserier grundade på kön — där barn kan växa och utvecklas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Schools shall be a safe place — free from racism, homophobia, and harassment based on gender — where children can grow and develop.”
- better support for teachers»Att förbättra skolresultaten måste vara en huvudprioritering. Det vill vi åstadkomma med bättre stöd och fortbildning för lärare och rektorer, och rätt stöd till alla elever.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Improving school results must be a main priority. We want to achieve this with better support and continuing education for teachers and principals, and appropriate support for all students.”
- teacher profession's authority»Professionella lärares kompetens och pedagogik är avgörande.« (party programme ↗)“Professional teachers' competence and pedagogy are decisive.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan explicitly requires increased authority for teachers and that the law establishes staff's right to maintain order.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly requires increased authority for teachers and that the law establishes staff's right to maintain order. It also wants rectors to more easily be able to relocate pupils who seriously disrupt and that school staff get more tools against chaos and disorder. The counter-proposal's requirement for clear legal support for those who intervene in disruptions is exactly what the plan demands.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver uttryckligen ökade befogenheter för lärare och att lagen slår fast personalens rätt att upprätthålla studiero. Den vill också att rektorer enklare ska kunna omplacera elever som allvarligt stör och att skolans personal får fler verktyg mot stök och oordning. Motförslagets krav på tydligt lagstöd för den som ingriper vid ordningsstörningar är exakt det planen efterfrågar.
- increased teacher authoritydecisive»Vi vill ge lärare ökad rätt att agera mot elever som förstör för klasskompisar och sig själv« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to give teachers increased authority to act against pupils who cause trouble for classmates and themselves”
- legal support for order»lagen ska slå fast lärarens befogenheter för att upprätthålla studiero i klassrummet« (party programme ↗)“the law shall establish the teacher's authority to maintain order in the classroom”
- easier relocation of disruptive pupils»Rektorer ska enklare kunna omplacera elever som allvarligt stör verksamhet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Rectors shall more easily be able to relocate pupils who seriously disrupt operations.”
- more tools against disorder»fler verktyg för lärare och rektor att hantera stök och oordning« (2022 manifesto ↗)“more tools for teachers and rectors to handle chaos and disorder”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The party programme requires that the school's working environment is characterized by security, peace and good order, which presupposes that staff intervening against disturbances have clear legal support.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme requires that the school's working environment is characterized by security, peace and good order, which presupposes that staff intervening against disturbances have clear legal support. The election manifesto goes further and wants to particularly criminalize profanity against officials, thus strengthening those who maintain order. The plan does not speak of the legal solution per se, but its line supports the counter-proposal's requirements.
Original (Swedish)
Principprogrammet kräver att skolans arbetsmiljö genomsyras av trygghet, arbetsro och god ordning, vilket förutsätter att personal som ingriper mot ordningsstörningar har ett tydligt rättsligt stöd. Valmanifestet går längre än så och vill särskilt straffbelägga okvädningsord mot tjänstemän, alltså stärka den som upprätthåller ordning. Planen talar inte om just den lagtekniska lösningen, men dess linje bär motförslagets krav.
- peace and order in schooldecisive»trygghet, arbetsro och god ordning.« (party programme ↗)“security, peace and good order.”
- protection for officials in service»Inför brottsrubriceringen missfirmelse mot tjänsteman, dvs att skrika okvädningsord till poliser, ska förbjudas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Introduce the offence of disrespect towards a civil servant, i.e. that shouting profanities at police officers, shall be prohibited.”
- consistent rule enforcement»Alla brott ska effektivt och utan undantag beivras« (party programme ↗)“All crimes shall be effectively and without exception prosecuted”
- restored security»Tryggheten på gator och torg måste återupprättas, brottsförebyggande arbetet måste stärkas, brottslingar dömas och brottsoffer få upprättelse.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Security on streets and squares must be restored, crime prevention work must be strengthened, criminals tried and crime victims given redress.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan explicitly promises to strengthen teachers' and headmasters' authority to intervene in disruptive situations, which is exactly what the counter-proposal requires: clear legal authority for staff intervening against order disruptions.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly promises to strengthen teachers' and headmasters' authority to intervene in disruptive situations, which is exactly what the counter-proposal requires: clear legal authority for staff intervening against order disruptions. The plan also wants to write order and study peace into the School Act's opening section and make violence against school staff its own criminal offense. Order and study peace are emphasized as a prerequisite for learning.
Original (Swedish)
Planen lovar uttryckligen att stärka lärares och rektorers auktoritet att ingripa i stökiga situationer, vilket är exakt det motförslaget kräver: tydligt lagstöd för personal som ingriper mot ordningsstörningar. Planen vill dessutom skriva in ordning och studiero i skollagens portalparagraf och göra våld mot skolpersonal till egen brottsrubricering. Ordning och studiero framhålls som en förutsättning för lärande.
- strengthened authority to intervenedecisive»Stärka lärares och rektorers auktoritet att kunna ingripa i stökiga situationer« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen teachers' and headmasters' authority to be able to intervene in disruptive situations”
- order and study peace in law»Skriva in ordning och studiero i skollagens portalparagraf och införa ordningsomdömen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Write order and study peace into the School Act's opening section and introduce order orders”
- protection for school staff»Införa våld mot skolpersonal som ny brottsrubricering« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Introduce violence against school staff as a new criminal offense”
- study peace as a fundamental condition»Studiero är en förutsättning för lärande.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Study peace is a prerequisite for learning.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan requires that teachers be given increased powers and that the possibility of intervening with sharp measures against students who disrupt the working environment be reviewed.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that teachers be given increased powers and that the possibility of intervening with sharp measures against students who disrupt the working environment be reviewed. The counter-proposal's requirement that staff intervening in discipline disturbances have clear legal support is exactly this. The party programme also establishes that the security and peace and quiet of well-behaved students shall always take precedence over disruptive students' needs.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att lärare ges ökade befogenheter och att möjligheten att ingripa med skarpa åtgärder mot elever som förstör arbetsmiljön ses över. Motförslagets krav på att personal som ingriper vid ordningsstörningar ska ha lagens tydliga stöd är precis detta. Partiprogrammet slår dessutom fast att skötsamma elevers trygghet och studiero alltid går före bråkiga elevers behov.
- sharp interventions in schooldecisive»Nolltolerans ska råda mot hot och våld i skolan och möjligheten att ingripa med skarpa åtgärder mot elever som skapar en dålig arbetsmiljö för andra ska ses över.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Zero tolerance shall prevail against threats and violence in school and the possibility of intervening with sharp measures against students who create a poor working environment for others shall be reviewed.”
- increased teacher powers»Ge lärare ökade befogenheter och bättre ställning i sin yrkesroll« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Give teachers increased powers and better position in their professional role”
- zero tolerance for violence in school»Förbättra arbetsmiljön genom att införa nolltolerans mot våld och otrygghet i skolan« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Improve the working environment by introducing zero tolerance against violence and insecurity in school”
- peace and quiet before disruption»Trygghet och studiero för skötsamma elever måste alltid vara överordnad bråkiga elevers behov.« (party programme ↗)“Security and peace and quiet for well-behaved students must always be superior to disruptive students' needs.”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2024/25:UbU11)
- Committee report full text (HC01UbU11)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2024/25:1059 — Införande av rätten till punktskrift i skollagen av Christofer Bergenblock (C)
- Motion 2024/25:1086 — Särskilt begåvade barns möjligheter i skolan av Helena Storckenfeldt (M)
- Motion 2024/25:1126 — Stärkta rättigheter för elever i behov av särskilt stöd av Joanna Lewerentz och Caroline Högström (båda M)
- Motion 2024/25:1131 — Minskad belastning för skolkuratorer av Joanna Lewerentz (M)
- Motion 2024/25:1133 — Registerkontroll inom skola och barnomsorg av Christian Carlsson (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:1289 — Rätten till assistans för barn med diabetes i skolan och förskolan av Anna-Lena Hedberg (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1341 — Friluftsliv för folkhälsan av Anna-Lena Hedberg m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1362 — En stärkt psykisk hälsa i hela landet av Carina Ståhl Herrstedt m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1366 — Socialtjänsten av Carina Ståhl Herrstedt m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1444 — Förutsättningar för en grundskola i världsklass av Patrick Reslow m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1446 — En gymnasieskola och vuxenutbildning i världsklass av Patrick Reslow m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1447 — En grundskola i världsklass av Patrick Reslow m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1448 — En förskola i världsklass av Patrick Reslow m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1514 — Skolfrukost av Malin Larsson och Peder Björk (båda S)
- Motion 2024/25:1524 — Utökad satsning på läsinlärning genom stärkt lärarkompetens av Lars Isacsson (S)
- Motion 2024/25:1677 — Betygsättning på elever med skyddad identitet av Ludvig Ceimertz och Ann-Charlotte Hammar Johnsson (båda M)
- Motion 2024/25:1726 — Utökat stöd i skolan till barn med neuropsykiatrisk funktionsnedsättning av Julia Kronlid (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1761 — Hjälpmedel vid nationella prov för elever med dyslexi av Eva Lindh (S)
- Motion 2024/25:179 — Menssäkra skolor - en självklarhet för allas trygghet och hälsa av Anna Wallentheim (S)
- Motion 2024/25:1822 — Stärkt friluftsliv i skolan och inom fritidshem av Emma Ahlström Köster m.fl. (M)
Source: The Swedish Parliament