2024-11-202024/25:NU9 · p.3NUBusiness & energy

Costs and fees

Who should bear the costs of electricity grid companies' new tasks

What's at stake: If the grid companies' new costs are nonetheless passed on to the whole customer base through the grid fee, all electricity users are affected, at a time when electricity and grid prices are already high and options for switching grid provider are limited.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is whether electricity users risk indirectly paying for the new tasks placed on grid companies in connection with shared electricity subscriptions and energy communities, or whether the government's proposal sufficiently ensures that no such extra costs are passed on to consumers.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee rejects the motions on costs and fees for the grid companies' new tasks. The full reasoning for this point is missing from the available material.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 2 (V)

The reservation (V) supports the proposal for shared electricity subscriptions with sub-metering and energy communities, but argues it is contradictory for the government to say that electricity users will not be charged extra costs while also saying that grid companies will levy special fees and that remaining costs will be passed on to the whole customer base through the grid fee. The reservation wants the government to ensure that electricity users are not hit by either direct or indirect extra costs when the proposal is implemented.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 2 by V.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
Vown reservationNoNo 0/19/0/5follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
SNoYes 92/0/0/14departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
MPNoAbstain 0/0/13/5departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
CNoYes 19/0/0/5departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
LNoYes 12/0/0/4departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived
KDNoYes 15/0/0/4departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived
MNoYes 59/0/0/9departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived
SDNoYes 61/0/0/11departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived

Committee proposal

The Riksdag rejects the motions 2024/25:3243 by Birger Lahti et al. (V) and 2024/25:3258 by Linus Lakso and Emma Nohrén (both MP) claim 2.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2024/25:3243 av Birger Lahti m.fl. (V) och 2024/25:3258 av Linus Lakso och Emma Nohrén (båda MP) yrkande 2.

Riksdag decision: Companies on the electricity market should become better at providing their customers with access to metering and consumption data. The Riksdag approved a government proposal based on new EU rules in the electricity market area. The purpose of the new regulatory framework, which involves amendments to the Electricity Act, is for customers to better be able to adapt and plan their energy use. The legislative changes come into force on January 5, 2025.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoNofollows the plannot addressed

The plan wants the public sector to explicitly take over responsibility for the electricity grid in order to reduce charges for households, and sees electricity as part of the infrastructure where prices should be based on socio-economic objectives.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants the public sector to explicitly take over responsibility for the electricity grid in order to reduce charges for households, and sees electricity as part of the infrastructure where prices should be based on socio-economic objectives. That electricity users should not be affected by direct or indirect additional costs when shared electricity subscriptions and energy communities are introduced is therefore in line with the plan. The plan also gives the state a role in keeping companies' pricing at a reasonable level.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill att det offentliga tar över ansvaret för elnätet uttryckligen för att avgifterna för hushållen ska minska, och ser el som en del av infrastrukturen där priser ska utgå från samhällsekonomiska mål. Att elanvändare inte ska drabbas av direkta eller indirekta merkostnader när gemensamma elabonnemang och energigemenskaper införs ligger därför i linje med planen. Planen ger också staten en roll i att hålla företagens prissättning på en rimlig nivå.

  • lower electricity grid charges for householdsdecisive»Det offentliga ska ta över ansvaret för elnätet, vilket kommer leda till minskade avgifter för hushållen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The public sector shall take over responsibility for the electricity grid, which will lead to reduced charges for households.”
  • electricity as shared infrastructure»Vi ser el och värme som en del av Sveriges infrastruktur, där« (party programme ↗)“We see electricity and heat as part of Sweden's infrastructure, where”
  • state price pressure»Staten kan också spela viktiga roller för att hålla företagens« (party programme ↗)“The state can also play important roles in keeping companies'”
  • privatizations have raised electricity prices»Privatiseringar har lett till dyrare elpris« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Privatizations have led to higher electricity prices”
SSocialdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The election manifesto explicitly states that the cost of the electricity grid should be reasonable for electricity customers regardless of where in the country they live, and wants to use capacity charges to lower costs.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto explicitly states that the cost of the electricity grid should be reasonable for electricity customers regardless of where in the country they live, and wants to use capacity charges to lower costs. The counter-proposal's requirement that electricity users should not be burdened by direct or indirect additional costs when shared subscriptions are introduced follows from this. The plan does not express itself on the chosen charging model.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet slår uttryckligen fast att kostnaderna för elnätet ska vara rimliga för elkunderna oavsett var i landet man bor, och vill använda kapacitetsavgifter för att sänka kostnaderna. Motförslagets krav att elanvändare inte ska drabbas av direkta eller indirekta merkostnader när gemensamma abonnemang införs följer av det. Planen uttalar sig inte om den valda avgiftsmodellen.

  • reasonable electricity grid costsdecisive»Samtidigt är det viktigt att kostnaderna för utbyggnaden av elnätet är rimliga för elkunderna, oavsett var i landet man bor.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“At the same time, it is important that the costs of expanding the electricity grid are reasonable for electricity customers, regardless of where in the country they live.”
  • reduced grid costs»Vi vill se till att intäkterna från kapacitetsavgifter som inte används för nätinvesteringar används både för att minska prisskillnaderna och sänka kostnaderna.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to ensure that revenues from capacity charges not used for grid investments are used both to reduce price differences and lower costs.”
  • electricity costs impact households»De höga elpriserna slår mot människors plånböcker och skapar svårigheter för industrin.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“High electricity prices hit people's pocketbooks and create difficulties for industry.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MPMiljöpartietNoAbstaindeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan wants to promote energy communities and own electricity production, among other things through abolishing energy tax for those producing electricity for own use, major investment in solar panels and support for smart grids.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants to promote energy communities and own electricity production, among other things through abolishing energy tax for those producing electricity for own use, major investment in solar panels and support for smart grids. It also wants strong consumer protection. That ensuring electricity users are not hit by direct or indirect extra costs when shared subscriptions and energy communities are introduced therefore supports the plan.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill främja energigemenskaper och egen elproduktion, bland annat genom slopad energiskatt för den som producerar el för eget bruk, storsatsning på solceller och stöd till smarta elnät. Den vill också ha ett starkt konsumentskydd. Att säkerställa att elanvändare inte drabbas av direkta eller indirekta merkostnader när gemensamma abonnemang och energigemenskaper införs stöder därför planen.

  • encourage own electricity productiondecisive»helt ta bort energiskatten för företag som producerar el för eget bruk.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“completely remove the energy tax for companies producing electricity for own use.”
  • support for renewable and own electricity»ekonomiskt stöd för att främja de förnybara energislagen, utveckla smarta elnät och stimulera fler« (party programme ↗)“economic support to promote renewable energy sources, develop smart grids and stimulate more”
  • major investment in solar electricity»storsatsa på solceller och solvärme.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“major investment in solar panels and solar heating.”
  • strong consumer protection»produkter och tjänster. Vi vill ha ett starkt skydd« (party programme ↗)“products and services. We want strong protection”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

CCenterpartietNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The counter-proposal supports joint electricity subscriptions and energy communities but wants to ensure that electricity users do not bear direct or indirect additional costs.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The counter-proposal supports joint electricity subscriptions and energy communities but wants to ensure that electricity users do not bear direct or indirect additional costs. The plan's commitment is that it shall be easy and cheap to produce one's own electricity and reduce energy consumption at home, and that household electricity costs shall be lowered. The requirement thus aligns with the plan, which however does not express itself on the distribution of network charges.

Original (Swedish)

Motförslaget stödjer gemensamma elabonnemang och energigemenskaper men vill säkra att elanvändarna inte får bära direkta eller indirekta merkostnader. Planens åtagande är att det ska vara enkelt och billigt att producera egen el och minska energianvändningen hemma, och att hushållens elkostnader ska sänkas. Kravet ligger därmed i linje med planen, som dock inte uttalar sig om nätavgifternas fördelning.

  • cheap to produce one's own electricitydecisive»Det ska vara enkelt och billigt att installera solpaneler, bygga laddning till elbilar och minska energianvändningen hemma — vare sig man bor i hus eller lägenhet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It shall be easy and cheap to install solar panels, build charging for electric cars, and reduce energy consumption at home — whether one lives in a house or apartment.”
  • lowered household electricity costs»Och med ett grönt avdrag för energieffektiviseringar i hemmet kan vi sänka hushållens elkostnader.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“And with a green deduction for energy efficiency improvements in the home, we can lower household electricity costs.”
  • easier own electricity production»Det ska bli enklare att producera mer av sin egen el, med bland annat solpaneler och bättre elförsörjning inne i tätorter.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It shall become easier to produce more of one's own electricity, with, among other things, solar panels and better electricity supply in urban areas.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

LLiberalernaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The election manifesto's energy line is cheap and reliable electricity throughout the country, and the party wants to actively lower taxes on electricity to ease costs for households.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto's energy line is cheap and reliable electricity throughout the country, and the party wants to actively lower taxes on electricity to ease costs for households. Ensuring that electricity users are not hit by direct or indirect additional costs when shared subscriptions and energy communities are introduced follows from that undertaking, as does the requirement for consumer protection and correct information. The plan does not address the construction of network charges, so the coverage is derived.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestets energilinje är billig och pålitlig el i hela landet, och partiet vill aktivt sänka skatter på el för att lindra kostnaderna för hushållen. Att säkerställa att elanvändare inte drabbas av direkta eller indirekta merkostnader när gemensamma abonnemang och energigemenskaper införs följer av det åtagandet, liksom av kravet på konsumentskydd och korrekt information. Planen behandlar inte nätavgifternas konstruktion, varför täckningen är härledd.

  • cheap electricity to householdsdecisive»Billig el och pålitlig el i hela landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Cheap electricity and reliable electricity throughout the country.”
  • lower electricity costs»Vi vill både sänka elmomsen och den särskilda extraskatten på el för att mildra elprischocken här och nu.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to both lower electricity VAT and the special extra tax on electricity to ease the electricity price shock here and now.”
  • strong consumer protection»Därför behövs en stark konkurrenslagstiftning och konsumentlagar som ger rätt till korrekt« (party programme ↗)“Therefore a strong competition law and consumer laws are needed that give the right to correct”
  • individual's position in agreements»Den enskildes inflytande över de avtal som ingås i« (party programme ↗)“The individual's influence over agreements entered into in”

Worldstate weighed in: The electricity price in SE3 has risen to 0.58 SEK/kWh in November from approximately 0.15 SEK/kWh in September — the plan's undertaking about cheap electricity weighs heavier against new network charges for the customer collective

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

KDKristdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The election manifesto puts household electricity costs in focus, with a shock absorber in the electricity tax when electricity prices rise and with explicit concern for those hit by fuel poverty.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto puts household electricity costs in focus, with a shock absorber in the electricity tax when electricity prices rise and with explicit concern for those hit by fuel poverty. The party programme wants an energy system that ensures access to cheap energy. Ensuring that electricity users are not hit by direct or indirect additional costs when the new rules are introduced aligns with the plan's line.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet sätter hushållens elkostnader i centrum, med en stötdämpare i elskatten när elpriserna stiger och med uttrycklig omsorg om dem som drabbats av elfattigdom. Partiprogrammet vill ha ett energisystem som säkerställer tillgång till billig energi. Att säkerställa att elanvändare inte drabbas av direkta eller indirekta merkostnader när de nya reglerna införs ligger därför i planens linje.

  • protect households against electricity pricesdecisive»i elskatten så att den sänks om elpriserna ökar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“in the electricity tax so that it is reduced if electricity prices rise.”
  • combat fuel poverty»Vi ser den som drabbats av elfattigdom och som tvingades ha ytterjackan på sig hemma i vintras för att uppvärmningen blivit för dyr.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We see those affected by fuel poverty and who were forced to keep the outer jacket on at home in the winter because heating became too expensive.”
  • access to cheap energy»Strävan ska vara att åstadkomma ett system som minimerar miljöbelastningen och säkerställer tillgången« (party programme ↗)“The goal should be to create a system that minimizes environmental impact and ensures access”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MModeraternaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan's overarching commitment in the electricity area is that households shall not be hit by high electricity costs: high-cost protection shall protect against electricity bills, revenues from the high prices shall return to households and no one shall feel anxiety opening the electricity bill.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan's overarching commitment in the electricity area is that households shall not be hit by high electricity costs: high-cost protection shall protect against electricity bills, revenues from the high prices shall return to households and no one shall feel anxiety opening the electricity bill. The counter-proposal's demand that electricity users shall not bear either direct or indirect additional costs when joint subscriptions and energy communities are introduced aligns with that line. Network companies' fee structure is not addressed in the plan, hence derived coverage.

Original (Swedish)

Planens genomgående åtagande på elområdet är att hushållen inte ska drabbas av höga elkostnader: högkostnadsskydd ska skydda mot elräkningarna, intäkterna från de höga priserna ska tillbaka till hushållen och ingen ska få ångest av att öppna elräkningen. Motförslagets krav att elanvändare inte ska bära vare sig direkta eller indirekta merkostnader när gemensamma abonnemang och energigemenskaper införs ligger i den linjen. Nätföretagens avgiftskonstruktion behandlas inte i planen, därav härledd täckning.

  • protect households against high electricity costsdecisive»Skydda hushållen mot vinterns elräkningar genom ett högkostnadsskydd« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Protect households against winter electricity bills through high-cost protection”
  • money back to households»Dessutom vill vi se till att de höga elpriserna som drivits fram av nedlagd kärnkraft går tillbaka till hushållen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Moreover, we want to see that the high electricity prices driven by decommissioned nuclear power return to households.”
  • affordable electricity bills»Det är ett Sverige där ingen får ångest av att öppna elräkningen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is a Sweden where no one gets anxiety from opening the electricity bill.”
  • cheaper to save electricity»Göra det billigare för privatpersoner att minska sin elkonsumtion genom att förstärka och utvidga det gröna skatteavdraget« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Make it cheaper for private persons to reduce their electricity consumption by strengthening and widening the green tax deduction”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

SDSverigedemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan requires cheap and reliable electricity at reasonable prices and wants to permanently lower the tax on electrical energy, with stated concern that households are forced to bear the consequences of energy policy.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan requires cheap and reliable electricity at reasonable prices and wants to permanently lower the tax on electrical energy, with stated concern that households are forced to bear the consequences of energy policy. Ensuring that electricity users are not affected by direct or indirect additional costs when the new rules are implemented aligns with that commitment. The plan thus supports the requirement, even though it does not address the structure of electricity network fees.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver billig och pålitlig el till rimliga priser och vill sänka skatten på elenergi permanent, med uttalad oro för att hushållen tvingas bära konsekvenserna av energipolitiken. Att säkerställa att elanvändare inte drabbas av direkta eller indirekta merkostnader när de nya reglerna genomförs ligger i linje med det åtagandet. Planen stöder därför kravet, även om den inte behandlar elnätsavgifternas konstruktion.

  • lower electricity taxdecisive»Sänka skatten på elenergi permanent för att underlätta elektrifieringen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Lower the tax on electrical energy permanently to facilitate electrification”
  • reasonable electricity prices»El behövs året runt till rimliga priser.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Electricity is needed year-round at reasonable prices.”
  • reliable and cheap electricity»Säkra tillgången till pålitlig och billig el genom satsningar på framtidens kärnkraft.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Secure access to reliable and cheap electricity through investments in future nuclear power.”
  • households bear electricity costs»Något som gör att människor runt om i landet nu tvingas leva med konsekvenserna av den förda energipolitiken och där elpriserna under det senaste året varit de högsta någonsin.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Something that means people around the country are now forced to live with the consequences of the energy policy pursued and where electricity prices during the past year have been the highest ever.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament