2026-02-042025/26:MJU8 · p.1MJUEnvironment & agriculture
The Common Agricultural Policy
The EU's Common Agricultural Policy
What's at stake: The decision concerns the conditions Swedish farmers operate under, including the regulatory burden and access to investment support for irrigation dams, as well as the direction the EU's agricultural policy should take ahead of a possible enlargement of the union. It concerns farmers' profitability and competitiveness relative to farmers in other EU countries.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether Sweden should push for a more far-reaching reform of the EU's Common Agricultural Policy and stronger national measures, including on irrigation dams and regulatory burden, or whether the ongoing work under the strategic plan and the EU's upcoming CAP vision is enough.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee notes that work on the Common Agricultural Policy after 2027 is already under way, that the Commission has presented a vision for 2040 covering greater profitability, competitiveness and simplification, and that the government raised investment support for irrigation dams and simplified its selection criteria during 2025. With reference to this ongoing work, the committee rejects the motions.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 2 (C)
The reservation (C) argues that agricultural policy in the EU and Sweden has not sufficiently increased farmers' profitability and competitiveness, and wants Sweden to actively push for a more sustainable reform of EU policy while safeguarding competitiveness, for the Commission and Swedish authorities to cut red tape and streamline controls, and for the government to take firmer action on the terms for irrigation dam grants, which the reservation says remain too unfavourable to be taken up.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 2 by C.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have gone the other way
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: KDKristdemokraterna, LLiberalerna, MModeraterna, SDSverigedemokraterna
Ja 168–21Nej 20–169
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Yes 19/0/0/3 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| S | No | Abstain 0/0/91/15 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| MP | No | Abstain 0/0/12/6 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| C | No | No 0/21/0/3 | match | confidence: high | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 14/0/0/2 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| KD | No | Yes 14/0/0/5 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| M | No | Yes 58/0/0/10 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: medium | explicit |
| SD | No | Yes 62/0/0/9 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
Committee proposal
Parliament rejects the motions 2025/26:1521 by Emma Ahlström Köster (M) demand 2, 2025/26:2833 by Helena Lindahl et al. (C) demands 30-33, 2025/26:3428 by Emma Nohrén et al. (MP) demand 6, 2025/26:3596 by Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist et al. (C) demands 63 and 64, 2025/26:3733 by Åsa Westlund et al. (S) demand 5, 2025/26:3774 by Emma Nohrén et al. (MP) demand 12 and 2025/26:3780 by Rebecka Le Moine et al. (MP) demand 7.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2025/26:1521 av Emma Ahlström Köster (M) yrkande 2, 2025/26:2833 av Helena Lindahl m.fl. (C) yrkandena 30-33, 2025/26:3428 av Emma Nohrén m.fl. (MP) yrkande 6, 2025/26:3596 av Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist m.fl. (C) yrkandena 63 och 64, 2025/26:3733 av Åsa Westlund m.fl. (S) yrkande 5, 2025/26:3774 av Emma Nohrén m.fl. (MP) yrkande 12 och 2025/26:3780 av Rebecka Le Moine m.fl. (MP) yrkande 7.
Riksdag decision: Parliament said no to approximately 120 proposals in motions on agricultural policy. The motions were submitted during the general motion period in 2025 and deal with, among other things, the Common Agricultural Policy, a sustainable and competitive agriculture, and agriculture's climate and environmental impact. Parliament refers mainly to work already underway in the areas addressed by the proposals.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants the government to reform agricultural policy in a more sustainable direction, reduce regulatory burden, and intensify support for irrigation investments. (C) — Reservation 2
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan sees agriculture's long-term sustainability as important for both ecosystems and Sweden's economic independence and gives the state a special responsibility for self-sufficiency in food, which speaks for a more sustainable reform of the EU's agricultural policy with preserved competitiveness.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan sees agriculture's long-term sustainability as important for both ecosystems and Sweden's economic independence and gives the state a special responsibility for self-sufficiency in food, which speaks for a more sustainable reform of the EU's agricultural policy with preserved competitiveness. The plan also wants to see good conditions for sound businesses, which aligns with the requirement for a review of rules and controls. Measures for irrigation are climate adaptation of the kind the plan seeks.
Original (Swedish)
Planen ser jordbrukets långsiktiga hållbarhet som viktig för både ekosystemen och Sveriges ekonomiska självständighet och ger staten ett särskilt ansvar för självförsörjningen med livsmedel, vilket talar för en mer hållbar reform av EU:s jordbrukspolitik med bevarad konkurrenskraft. Planen vill också se goda villkor för sunda företag, vilket rimmar med kravet på en genomgång av regler och kontroller. Insatser för bevattning är klimatanpassning av det slag planen efterfrågar.
- sustainable agriculturedecisive»Jordbrukets långsiktiga hållbarhet är viktig för både ekosystemen och« (party programme ↗)“Agriculture's long-term sustainability is important for both ecosystems and”
- food self-sufficiency»Staten har ett särskilt ansvar att se till« (party programme ↗)“The state has a special responsibility to ensure”
- good conditions for serious businesses»Vi vill se goda villkor för sunda företag« (party programme ↗)“We want to see good conditions for sound businesses”
- sustainable food production»En annan viktig del i den gröna omställningen är satsningar på hållbar livsmedelsproduktion.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Another important part of the green transition is investments in sustainable food production.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan demands sustainable Swedish food production that strengthens self-sufficiency and robust competitiveness, and wants Sweden to be a leading player in the EU.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan demands sustainable Swedish food production that strengthens self-sufficiency and robust competitiveness, and wants Sweden to be a leading player in the EU. Actively driving a sustainable reform of EU agricultural policy while preserving competitiveness follows from this. Furthermore, the plan wants to strengthen preparedness against extreme weather such as droughts, which supports functioning assistance for irrigation dams.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver en livskraftig svensk livsmedelsproduktion som stärker självförsörjningen samt stark konkurrenskraft, och vill att Sverige är en ledande aktör i EU. Att aktivt driva en hållbar reform av EU:s jordbrukspolitik med värnad konkurrenskraft följer av det. Planen vill dessutom stärka beredskapen mot extremväder som torka, vilket talar för fungerande stöd till bevattningsdammar.
- strengthened self-sufficiencydecisive»Livskraftig svensk livsmedelsproduktion som stärker landets självförsörjningsförmåga.« (party programme ↗)“Viable Swedish food production that strengthens the country's self-sufficiency.”
- strengthened competitiveness»Innovationskraft, gott företagsklimat och stark konkurrenskraft för ökad tillväxt.« (party programme ↗)“Innovation capacity, good business climate and strong competitiveness for increased growth.”
- preparedness against drought»• Stärk beredskapen mot extremväder. Annars riskerar skyfall att svämma över städer, torka slå ut hela skördar och skogsbränder att breda ut sig. Vi vill fortsätta de stora investeringarna så att kommunerna kan klimatanpassa lokalt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen preparedness against extreme weather. Otherwise heavy downpours risk flooding cities, droughts may destroy entire harvests and forest fires may spread. We want to continue major investments so that municipalities can adapt to climate change locally.”
- proactive Swedish EU role»Sveriges ställning som en ledande aktör i EU stärks.« (party programme ↗)“Sweden's position as a leading actor in the EU is strengthened.”
flags: citat_migrerat
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan requires that the EU's agricultural policy is fundamentally changed and that the development towards large-scale farming is broken, while conditions for more farmers are improved.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that the EU's agricultural policy is fundamentally changed and that the development towards large-scale farming is broken, while conditions for more farmers are improved. It also wants public resources to strengthen agriculture's climate resilience, of which irrigation dams are an example. The counter-proposal's requirement for a more sustainable EU reform and usable irrigation support therefore aligns with the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att EU:s jordbrukspolitik förändras i grunden och att utvecklingen mot storskalighet bryts, samtidigt som villkoren för fler bönder förbättras. Den vill också att offentliga resurser stärker jordbrukets klimatresiliens, vilket bevattningsdammar är ett exempel på. Motförslagets krav på en mer hållbar EU-reform och användbara bevattningsstöd ligger därför i linje med planen.
- reformed EU agricultural policydecisive»EU:s jordbrukspolitik behöver förändras i grunden. Den ensidiga utvecklingen mot storskalighet måste brytas.« (party programme ↗)“The EU's agricultural policy needs to be fundamentally changed. The one-sided development towards large-scale farming must be broken.”
- better conditions for farmers»Miljöpartiet vill stärka det svenska jordbruket och skapa bättre villkor för fler bönder.« (party programme ↗)“The Greens want to strengthen Swedish agriculture and create better conditions for more farmers.”
- support for climate resilience»Offentliga resurser ska stödja bönder i den gröna omställningen och stärka jordbrukets klimatresiliens.« (party programme ↗)“Public resources shall support farmers in the green transition and strengthen agriculture's climate resilience.”
- promote small and medium-sized farms»Små och medelstora lantbruk som bygger på lokala kretslopp, hållbara och ekologiska brukningsmetoder och en god djurhållning ska främjas.« (party programme ↗)“Small and medium-sized farms that are based on local cycles, sustainable and ecological farming methods and good animal husbandry shall be promoted.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto requires an even more competitive agriculture and establishes that regulatory simplifications and lower costs are needed for increased food production and supply security, while unnecessary regulations and bureaucracy should be eliminated.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto requires an even more competitive agriculture and establishes that regulatory simplifications and lower costs are needed for increased food production and supply security, while unnecessary regulations and bureaucracy should be eliminated. The party programme states that the competitiveness of Swedish agriculture should be strengthened both within the EU and vis-à-vis the rest of the world. The counter-proposal's requirement for reform, fewer inspections and workable support conditions follow directly from this.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet kräver ett ännu mer konkurrenskraftigt jordbruk och slår fast att regelförenklingar och lägre kostnader krävs för ökad matproduktion och försörjningstrygghet, samtidigt som överflödiga regler och byråkrati ska rensas bort. Partiprogrammet anger att det svenska lantbrukets konkurrenskraft ska förstärkas både inom EU och gentemot övriga världen. Motförslagets krav på reform, färre kontroller och användbara stödvillkor följer direkt av detta.
- regulatory simplification for agriculturedecisive»Sverige behöver ett ännu mer konkurrenskraftigt jordbruk. En långsiktigt hållbar livsmedelsförsörjning med ökad försörjningstrygghet och ökad matproduktion kräver regelförenklingar och skattesänkningar, inklusive ett kraftfullt jordbruksavdrag och en biodrivmedelspremie som gör det hållbara lantbruket mer lönsamt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden needs an even more competitive agriculture. A long-term sustainable food supply with increased supply security and increased food production requires regulatory simplifications and tax cuts, including a strong agricultural deduction and a biofuel premium that makes sustainable agriculture more profitable.”
- strengthened competitiveness in the EU»Det svenska lantbrukets konkurrenskraft, både inom EU och gentemot övriga världen, ska förstärkas.« (party programme ↗)“The competitiveness of Swedish agriculture, both within the EU and against the rest of the world, should be strengthened.”
- fewer rules and inspections»Dyra, krångliga och innovationshämmande regelverk ligger som en våt filt över delar av landsbygden. Vi ska rensa upp bland överflödiga regler och byråkrati.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Expensive, complicated and innovation-inhibiting regulations lie like a wet blanket over parts of the countryside. We should clean up unnecessary rules and bureaucracy.”
- increased food production»Matproduktionen måste öka, på kort och lång sikt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Food production must increase, in the short and long term.”
The party programme requires that EU agricultural policy is reformed fundamentally, that direct support is phased out and that investments in landscape management and environment are developed instead.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme requires that EU agricultural policy is reformed fundamentally, that direct support is phased out and that investments in landscape management and environment are developed instead. This bears the counter-proposal's demand for active work for a more sustainable EU reform. The requirement for a review of regulations and controls responds to the plan's commitment to reduced regulatory burden at municipal, state and European level.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet kräver att EU:s jordbrukspolitik reformeras i grunden, att direktstöden avvecklas och att satsningar på landskapsvård och miljö utvecklas i stället. Det bär motförslagets krav på ett aktivt arbete för en mer hållbar EU-reform. Kravet på en genomgång av regelflora och kontroller svarar mot planens åtagande om minskad regelbörda på kommunal, statlig och europeisk nivå.
- fundamental reform of EU agricultural policydecisive»EU:s jordbrukspolitik behöver reformeras i grunden. Samtliga direktstöd och marknadsstörande regleringar ska fasas ut så snart som möjligt, och i stället behövs ökade satsningar på landskapsvård, miljöskydd och bevarad biologisk mångfald.« (party programme ↗)“EU agricultural policy needs to be reformed fundamentally. All direct support and market-distorting regulations must be phased out as soon as possible, and instead increased investments in landscape management, environmental protection and preserved biodiversity are needed.”
- phase out direct support»Direktstöden till jordbruket ska avvecklas medan landsbygdsstödet behålls och satsningar på landskapsvård och miljö utvecklas.« (party programme ↗)“Direct support to agriculture must be phased out while rural support is retained and investments in landscape management and environment are developed.”
- reduced regulatory burden»Regelbördan för små företag ska minska, genom ansträngningar på både kommunal, statlig och europeisk nivå, och offentliga beslut analyseras ur småföretagarperspektiv.« (party programme ↗)“The regulatory burden on small businesses must decrease through efforts at municipal, state and European level, and public decisions must be analyzed from a small business perspective.”
- sustainable agriculture»Ett hållbart jord- och skogsbruk är en del av lösningen på dagens miljöutmaningar.« (party programme ↗)“Sustainable agriculture and forestry is part of the solution to today's environmental challenges.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The election manifesto explicitly promises rule changes and cost reductions for Swedish agriculture to increase self-sufficiency and strengthen competitiveness, and the party programme requires that EU's agricultural policy provides conditions for competitive and environmentally sustainable agriculture with equal competitive conditions.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto explicitly promises rule changes and cost reductions for Swedish agriculture to increase self-sufficiency and strengthen competitiveness, and the party programme requires that EU's agricultural policy provides conditions for competitive and environmentally sustainable agriculture with equal competitive conditions. The counter-proposal's requirements for sustainable EU reform with protected competitiveness, review of regulatory complexity and controls as well as usable conditions for irrigation dams are the same commitments in substance. The requirement is supported.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet lovar uttryckligen regeländringar och kostnadslättnader för svenskt lantbruk för att öka självförsörjningen och stärka konkurrenskraften, och partiprogrammet kräver att EU:s jordbrukspolitik ger förutsättningar för ett konkurrenskraftigt och miljömässigt hållbart jordbruk med likvärdiga konkurrensvillkor. Motförslagets krav på hållbar EU-reform med värnad konkurrenskraft, genomgång av regelflora och kontroller samt användbara villkor för bevattningsdammar är samma åtaganden i sak. Kravet stöds.
- regulatory relief for agriculturedecisive»Regeländringar och kostnadslättnader för svenskt lantbruk för att öka Sveriges självförsörjning och stärka lantbrukets konkurrenskraft.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Rule changes and cost reductions for Swedish agriculture to increase Sweden's self-sufficiency and strengthen agriculture's competitiveness.”
- competitive and sustainable EU agricultural policy»Jordbrukspolitiken inom EU måste tillhandahålla förutsättningar för ett konkurrenskraftigt europeiskt jordbruk förenligt med internationell solidaritet och en levande landsbygd, som dessutom tjänar som garant för biologisk mångfald, god djurhållning och livsmedel framställda på ett miljömässigt hållbart sätt.« (party programme ↗)“Agricultural policy within the EU must provide conditions for competitive European agriculture compatible with international solidarity and a vibrant countryside, which furthermore serves as a guarantee for biodiversity, good animal husbandry and food produced in an environmentally sustainable manner.”
- equal competitive conditions»Det är nödvändigt att dessa näringar ges likvärdiga konkurrensvillkor gentemot andra länder.« (party programme ↗)“It is necessary that these industries are given equal competitive conditions compared to other countries.”
- counter bureaucracy»Byråkrati och krångliga regler ska motverkas.« (party programme ↗)“Bureaucracy and complicated rules shall be countered.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan explicitly commits to reducing the number of regulations for agriculture and shortening processing times, and to countering overimplementation of EU decisions with minimum level as the general rule.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly commits to reducing the number of regulations for agriculture and shortening processing times, and to countering overimplementation of EU decisions with minimum level as the general rule. The counter-proposal's demands for a review of the regulatory landscape and inspections at all levels and better conditions in the Common Agricultural Policy directly address these commitments. The plan's goal of strengthened profitability and increased domestic food production points in the same direction.
Original (Swedish)
Planen åtar sig uttryckligen att minska antalet regler för jordbruket och korta handläggningstiderna, och att motverka överimplementering av EU-beslut med miniminivå som huvudregel. Motförslagets krav på en genomgång av regelflora och kontroller på alla nivåer samt bättre villkor i den gemensamma jordbrukspolitiken svarar direkt mot dessa åtaganden. Planens mål om stärkt lönsamhet och ökad inhemsk livsmedelsproduktion pekar åt samma håll.
- fewer regulations for agriculturedecisive»Minska antalet regler för jordbruket och korta handläggningstider för miljötillstånd« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Reduce the number of regulations for agriculture and shorten processing times for environmental permits”
- EU rules at minimum level»Minska regelkrånglet och onödig byråkrati, bland annat genom att motverka överimplementering i Sverige av EU-beslut – som huvudregel ska EU-direktiv genomföras på miniminivå« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Reduce red tape and unnecessary bureaucracy, among other things by countering overimplementation in Sweden of EU decisions – as a general rule EU directives shall be implemented at minimum level”
- better conditions for farming»Moderaterna vill förbättra förutsättningarna att driva lantbruk genom att sänka skatterna« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Moderates want to improve the conditions for running farms by lowering taxes”
- increased domestic food production»Stärka jordbruket för att öka den inhemska produktionen av livsmedel« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen agriculture to increase domestic food production”
flags: citat_migrerat
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan states that EU rules must become fewer and more flexible based on each member state's conditions and that regulation should be simplified whilst legal certainty is improved.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that EU rules must become fewer and more flexible based on each member state's conditions and that regulation should be simplified whilst legal certainty is improved. It specifically points to EU agricultural policy as an administrative burden that makes it difficult for farms to be profitable. The counter-proposal's demands for reform of EU policy, review of regulatory flora and controls and better conditions in support provision directly respond to these commitments.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att EU-reglerna måste bli färre och mer flexibla utifrån varje medlemsstats förutsättningar och att regelverken ska förenklas samtidigt som rättssäkerheten förbättras. Den pekar särskilt ut EU:s jordbrukspolitik som en administrativ börda som gör det svårt för lantbruk att vara lönsamma. Motförslagets krav på reform av EU-politiken, genomgång av regelflora och kontroller samt bättre villkor i stödgivningen svarar direkt mot dessa åtaganden.
- fewer and more flexible EU rulesdecisive»EU-reglerna måste bli färre och mer flexibla utifrån varje medlemsstats unika landskap, tradition och standarder.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“EU rules must become fewer and more flexible based on each member state's unique landscape, tradition and standards.”
- regulatory simplification in agriculture»Förenkla regelverken och förbättra rättssäkerheten« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Simplify regulation and improve legal certainty”
- EU bureaucracy burdens farming»EU:s jordbrukspolitik påverkar svenskt jordbruk mycket, begränsar ofta vad som är möjligt och orsakar en stor administrativ börda och omfattande regleringar som tynger lantbrukare och gör det svårt för småskaliga lantbruk att upprätthålla lönsamhet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“EU agricultural policy affects Swedish agriculture greatly, often limits what is possible and causes a large administrative burden and extensive regulations that weigh on farmers and make it difficult for small-scale farms to maintain profitability.”
- increased competitiveness»Öka det svenska jordbrukets konkurrenskraft och Sveriges självförsörjning av livsmedel« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Increase Swedish agriculture's competitiveness and Sweden's self-sufficiency in food”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:MJU8)
- Committee report full text (HD01MJU8)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:1021 — Översyn av lagen avseende rätten att äga ren av Magnus Jacobsson (KD)
- Motion 2025/26:1143 — Statlig lånegaranti till Sveriges lantbrukare av Anders Karlsson (C)
- Motion 2025/26:1144 — Klimatutmaningar i jordbruket av Anders Karlsson (C)
- Motion 2025/26:1312 — Främjande av ökad inhemsk livsmedelsproduktion och livsmedelsforskning av Per-Arne Håkansson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1391 — Myndigheter och livsmedelsstrategin av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1393 — Tydligare mål i livsmedelsstrategin av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1460 — Risk för dubbla ekonomiska sanktioner för Sveriges lantbrukare av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1521 — Förstärkt stöd för pollinatörer och kommunala åtgärder för biologisk mångfald av Emma Ahlström Köster (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1660 — Livskraftig skånsk landsbygd av Peter Ollén m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1662 — En självständig och säker livsmedelsförsörjning för Sverige och Norden av Emma Ahlström Köster (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2100 — Enklare för småskalig djurhållning på landsbygden av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2105 — En strategi för ökad produktion och export av svensk mat av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2106 — En årlig jämförelse av konkurrenskraften inom lantbruket av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2142 — Underlätta för svensk biodling av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2025/26:220 — Risker för jordbruksmark och växande grödor med besprutning med RNA av Elsa Widding (-)
- Motion 2025/26:2247 — Ekologisk mat av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2393 — Avbytare inom jordbruket av Magnus Oscarsson och Larry Söder (båda KD)
- Motion 2025/26:2420 — Ekologisk odling - dess påverkan på livsmedelsförsörjningen och Sveriges säkerhet av Mats Green (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2466 — Ett fritt och konkurrenskraftigt jordbruk av John E Weinerhall (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2619 — Fridtidsodlingens betydelse för livsmedelsförsörjning och livsmedelsberedskap av Rickard Nordin (C)
Source: The Swedish Parliament