2026-04-292025/26:FöU12 · p.4FöUDefence
Other questions regarding the future design of legislation
Future siting of shelters and early handling in the planning process
What's at stake: The issue is whether people across the whole country, in cities as well as rural areas, can rely on there being shelters near them and on shelter needs being factored in early when new housing areas are planned, while handling it earlier risks lengthening building-permit processes.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the government should report back to the Riksdag on how more shelters will be ensured in parts of the country where they are currently few or lacking, and whether shelter issues should be handled earlier in the planning and building-permit process, or whether the current approach is judged sufficient.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee endorses the government's bill on these remaining points and considers the questions of shelters' future siting and handling in the planning and building-permit process to be addressed through ongoing work, and therefore rejects the motion calling for a formal statement on these points.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 5 (C)
The reservation judges that more shelters will be needed in more parts of the country, since it is difficult to identify in advance which areas have less need, and wants the government to report back on how this will be addressed; it also wants shelter needs to be planned for early in the planning process, before the building-permit stage, with close contact between municipalities and authorities, clear guidelines, advice and support, and clear government steering of the relevant authorities.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 5 by C.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Yes 12/0/0/9 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| S | No | Yes 92/0/0/14 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| MP | No | Yes 15/0/0/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| C | No | No 0/20/0/4 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 9/0/0/7 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| KD | No | Yes 16/0/0/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| M | No | Yes 57/0/0/9 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| SD | No | Yes 60/0/0/10 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
Committee proposal
Parliament rejects the motion 2025/26:3938 by Mikael Larsson and Kerstin Lundgren (both C) demands 1 and 3.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motion 2025/26:3938 av Mikael Larsson och Kerstin Lundgren (båda C) yrkandena 1 och 3.
Riksdag decision: The Government wishes to strengthen protection for the civilian population during heightened alert. Parliament approved the Government's proposal for a new law on shelters and protected spaces. Today there are approximately 64,000 shelters with capacity for 7 million individuals in Sweden. However, this is not sufficient to provide the population with adequate protection. Now the Government wishes to ensure that Sweden has modern protection for the civilian population during heightened alert or armed attack. The Government has therefore proposed a new law on shelters and protected spaces. The new law provides, among other things, regulations for a new protection option beyond shelters, the so-called protected spaces. A protected space is a space for protecting the population that provides limited protection compared to shelters. The law amendments enter into force on 1 June 2026.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to ensure new emergency shelters are accessible to people with disabilities and that information is provided in easy Swedish and multiple languages. (C) — Reservation 5
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan does not address shelters, but requires a robust total defence with broad capability to meet various crises and public services to function throughout the country, not just where the need happens to be assessed as greatest.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan does not address shelters, but requires a robust total defence with broad capability to meet various crises and public services to function throughout the country, not just where the need happens to be assessed as greatest. Planning shelter needs early in the planning process with clear state direction also follows from the plan's requirement for genuine democratic anchorage in urban planning.
Original (Swedish)
Planen tar inte upp skyddsrum, men kräver ett robust totalförsvar med bred förmåga att möta olika kriser och att samhällsservicen ska fungera i hela landet, inte bara där behovet råkar bedömas störst. Att planera skyddsrumsbehovet tidigt i planprocessen med tydlig statlig styrning följer också av planens krav på genuin demokratisk förankring i samhällsplaneringen.
- broad crisis capabilitydecisive»Vi vill se ett modernt totalförsvar byggt på allmän värnplikt, med en bred förmåga att möta olika former av kriser Sverige kan ställas inför.« (party programme ↗)“We want to see a modern total defence built on universal conscription, with a broad capability to meet various forms of crises Sweden may face.”
- democratic urban planning»Planeringen behöver en genuin demokratisk förankring och utgå från människors kärlek till platsen man bor på.« (party programme ↗)“Planning needs genuine democratic anchorage and must be rooted in people's love for the place they live.”
- protection throughout the country»Välfärden måste vara till för alla och finnas överallt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Welfare must be for everyone and exist everywhere.”
- investments in preparedness»Investeringar i samhällets kärnverksamheter, gemensamt ägande i nyckelsektorer och medvetna strategier för landets ekonomiska utveckling är viktiga delar av det.« (party programme ↗)“Investments in society's core services, collective ownership in key sectors, and deliberate strategies for the country's economic development are important parts of this.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto asserts that work to strengthen civil defence and emergency preparedness must continue, and the party programme demands strong infrastructure for strengthened preparedness.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto asserts that work to strengthen civil defence and emergency preparedness must continue, and the party programme demands strong infrastructure for strengthened preparedness. The counter-proposal's demands for more shelters in more parts of the country, early planning in the planning process and clear state governance follow from these commitments, together with the plan's line on greater state responsibility for equivalent conditions throughout Sweden.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet slår fast att arbetet med att förstärka det civila försvaret och krisberedskapen måste fortsätta, och partiprogrammet kräver stark infrastruktur för stärkt beredskap. Motförslagets krav på fler skyddsrum i fler delar av landet, tidig planering i planprocessen och tydlig statlig styrning följer av dessa åtaganden, tillsammans med planens linje om större statligt ansvar för likvärdiga förutsättningar i hela Sverige.
- strengthened civil defencedecisive»Arbetet att förstärka det civila försvaret och krisberedskapen måste fortsätta« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Work to strengthen civil defence and emergency preparedness must continue”
- preparedness infrastructure»Stark infrastruktur för stärkt beredskap.« (party programme ↗)“Strong infrastructure for strengthened preparedness.”
- state governance for equivalence»Större statligt ansvar för likvärdiga förutsättningar i hela Sverige.« (party programme ↗)“Greater state responsibility for equivalent conditions throughout Sweden.”
- steering national planning»Styrande nationell bostadspolitik och stärkt kommunalt bostadsförsörjningsansvar.« (party programme ↗)“Steering national housing policy and strengthened municipal housing supply responsibility.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan requires a strengthened civil defence and increased appropriations for crisis preparedness so that society can handle various types of threats.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires a strengthened civil defence and increased appropriations for crisis preparedness so that society can handle various types of threats. It also establishes that risk considerations should be a self-evident and integrated part of societal planning and that the division of responsibility between state, municipalities and other actors should be clarified. The counter-proposal's requirement for more shelters in more parts of the country, early planning before the building permit phase and clear state direction thus aligns with the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver ett stärkt civilt försvar och ökade anslag till krisberedskap så att samhället klarar olika typer av hot. Den slår också fast att riskhänsyn ska vara en självklar och integrerad del av samhällsplaneringen och att ansvarsfördelningen mellan stat, kommuner och andra aktörer ska tydliggöras. Motförslagets krav på fler skyddsrum i fler delar av landet, tidig planering före bygglovsskedet och tydlig statlig styrning ligger därför i linje med planen.
- strengthened civil defencedecisive»Därför måste det civila försvaret stärkas, så att både Sveriges och EU:s krisberedskap är rustade för att kunna möta olika typer av hot.« (party programme ↗)“Therefore, civil defence must be strengthened, so that both Sweden's and the EU's crisis preparedness are equipped to meet various types of threats.”
- increased crisis preparedness appropriations»satsa en större andel av försvarets pengar på det civila försvaret, och öka anslagen till krisberedskap.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“allocate a larger share of defence spending to civil defence, and increase appropriations for crisis preparedness.”
- risk considerations early in planning»Miljöpartiet vill att klimatanpassning ska vara en självklar och integrerad del av samhällsplaneringen.« (party programme ↗)“The Greens want climate adaptation to be a self-evident and integrated part of societal planning.”
- clear state division of responsibility»Vi vill tydliggöra ansvarsfördelningen mellan stat, kommuner och andra aktörer, och se till att viktiga klimatanpassningsåtgärder får stabil finansiering.« (party programme ↗)“We want to clarify the division of responsibility between state, municipalities and other actors, and ensure that important climate adaptation measures receive stable financing.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan is explicit that civil defence and society's preparedness for war and crisis shall be armed, and that public service shall be close and reliable throughout the country.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan is explicit that civil defence and society's preparedness for war and crisis shall be armed, and that public service shall be close and reliable throughout the country. The counter-proposal's requirements for more shelters in more parts of the country and for early planning of shelter needs follow from these commitments. The plan moreover requires that government agencies cooperate when land is taken into use, which speaks for clear guidelines and frequent contact between municipalities and agencies.
Original (Swedish)
Planen är uttalad om att civilförsvaret och samhällets beredskap inför krig och kris ska rustas, och om att offentlig service ska vara nära och pålitlig i hela landet. Motförslagets krav på fler skyddsrum i fler delar av landet och på tidig planering av skyddsrumsbehov följer av dessa åtaganden. Planen kräver dessutom att statliga myndigheter samverkar när mark tas i anspråk, vilket talar för tydliga riktlinjer och täta kontakter mellan kommuner och myndigheter.
- arm civil defencedecisive»Även det civila försvaret är livsviktigt. Vi måste rusta civilförsvaret och samhällets beredskap inför krig och kris.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Civil defence too is vital. We must arm civil defence and strengthen society's preparedness for war and crisis.”
- strengthened civil preparedness»Centerpartiet vill rusta försvaret, stärka Sveriges civila beredskap och fullfölja inträdet i Nato.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Centre Party wants to arm defence, strengthen Sweden's civil preparedness and complete entry into NATO.”
- equal service throughout the country»Offentlig service ska vara nära och pålitlig i hela landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Public service shall be close and reliable throughout the country.”
- agencies shall cooperate»Statliga myndigheter måste samverka och arbeta marksnålt när man tar ny mark i anspråk för väg, tåg, el, etc.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Government agencies must cooperate and work in a land-economical way when taking new land into use for road, rail, electricity, etc.”
The plan requires that civil defence is strengthened in pace with military defence and that total defence is greatly strengthened, which speaks for more shelter rooms in more parts of the country.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that civil defence is strengthened in pace with military defence and that total defence is greatly strengthened, which speaks for more shelter rooms in more parts of the country. The plan also states that spatial planning is needed to manage future risks and that state service shall be secured across the entire country, which supports that shelter room needs are considered early in the planning process with clear state direction.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att det civila försvaret stärks i samma takt som det militära och att totalförsvaret stärks kraftigt, vilket talar för fler skyddsrum i fler delar av landet. Planen slår också fast att samhällsplanering behövs för att klara framtida risker och att statlig service ska säkras i hela landet, vilket stöder att skyddsrumsbehov beaktas tidigt i planprocessen med tydlig statlig styrning.
- strengthened civil defencedecisive»Antalet anställda och värnpliktiga i krigsorganisationen ska öka, ny materiel tillföras och det civila försvaret stärkas i samma takt som det militära.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The number of employees and conscripts in the wartime organization shall increase, new material shall be supplied and civil defence strengthened in pace with the military.”
- greatly strengthened total defence»behöver Sveriges totalförsvar stärkas kraftigt.« (party programme ↗)“Sweden's total defence needs to be greatly strengthened.”
- planning for societal risks»Det behövs samhällsplanering för att klara klimatförändringarnas« (party programme ↗)“Spatial planning is needed to manage the climate changes”
- state presence across the entire country»Tillgången till statlig service ska säkras i hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“Access to state services shall be secured across the entire country.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan requires that the entire total defence has sufficient resources to guarantee the population good protection, and that societal planning be directed at promoting security.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that the entire total defence has sufficient resources to guarantee the population good protection, and that societal planning be directed at promoting security. It also establishes that affected residents shall be involved early in the planning process. The counter-proposal's requirement for more shelters in more parts of the country and for shelter needs to be planned early, with clear state governance, follows from these commitments.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att det samlade totalförsvaret har tillräckliga resurser för att garantera befolkningen ett gott skydd, och att samhällsplaneringen inriktas på att främja trygghet. Den slår också fast att berörda invånare ska komma in tidigt i planprocessen. Motförslagets krav på fler skyddsrum i fler delar av landet och på att skyddsrumsbehovet planeras tidigt, med tydlig statlig styrning, följer av dessa åtaganden.
- protection for the populationdecisive»Det samlade totalförsvaret måste ha tillräckliga resurser för att kunna garantera« (party programme ↗)“The entire total defence must have sufficient resources to be able to guarantee”
- security in societal planning»Planeringen bör också inriktas på att bygga och utforma samhällena så att« (party programme ↗)“Planning should also be directed at building and designing communities so that”
- early participation in planning process»Det är viktigt att de invånare som är berörda av en plan får komma in med sina synpunkter så« (party programme ↗)“It is important that residents affected by a plan get to come in with their views so”
- all of the country shall function»Målet är att hela Sverige ska leva och att varje kommun och region ska vara ett fungerande« (party programme ↗)“The goal is that all of Sweden shall live and that every municipality and region shall be a functioning”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan establishes that functioning civil defence is a prerequisite for the military defence to be able to solve its tasks and requires long-term state planning for civil defence.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that functioning civil defence is a prerequisite for the military defence to be able to solve its tasks and requires long-term state planning for civil defence. The counter-proposal's requirement for more shelters in more parts of the country and early planning with clear state direction follows from that commitment. The plan also promises that all Sweden shall function, not just the most densely populated parts.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att ett fungerande civilt försvar är en förutsättning för att det militära försvaret ska kunna lösa sina uppgifter och kräver en långsiktig statlig planering för det civila försvaret. Motförslagets krav på fler skyddsrum i fler delar av landet och tidig planering med tydlig statlig styrning följer av det åtagandet. Planen lovar också att hela Sverige ska fungera, inte bara de mest tätbefolkade delarna.
- civil defence carries total defencedecisive»Fungerar inte det civila försvaret så kan inte heller det militära försvaret lösa sina uppgifter.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“If civil defence does not function, neither can military defence solve its tasks.”
- long-term planning civil defence»Säkra en långsiktig planering för det civila försvaret« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Secure long-term planning for civil defence”
- civil readiness in crisis»Det civila försvaret är även en avgörande resurs i händelse av kris.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Civil defence is also a decisive resource in the event of crisis.”
- the whole country must function»Moderaterna vill ta vara på hela Sveriges möjligheter. Men ska det gå att bo och verka i hela Sverige måste också hela Sverige fungera.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Moderate Party wants to harness the whole of Sweden's possibilities. But for it to be possible to live and work in all of Sweden, the whole of Sweden must function.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wants to strengthen society's preparedness for all types of crises and increase funding for authorities responsible for civil defense and preparedness, with an explicit ambition that preparedness should cover the needs of the entire population.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to strengthen society's preparedness for all types of crises and increase funding for authorities responsible for civil defense and preparedness, with an explicit ambition that preparedness should cover the needs of the entire population. The counter-proposal requires more shelters in more parts of the country, early planning and clear state direction of affected authorities, which aligns with this. The plan also emphasizes that civil defense is the prerequisite for military defense.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill stärka samhällets beredskap för alla typer av kriser och öka anslagen till de myndigheter som ansvarar för civilförsvar och beredskap, med en uttalad ambition att beredskapen ska täcka hela befolkningens behov. Motförslaget kräver fler skyddsrum i fler delar av landet, tidig planering och tydlig statlig styrning av berörda myndigheter, vilket ligger i linje med detta. Planen betonar också att civilförsvaret är förutsättningen för det militära försvaret.
- strengthened crisis preparednessdecisive»Sverigedemokraterna vill stärka samhällets beredskap för alla typer av kriser som kan uppstå.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Sweden Democrats want to strengthen society's preparedness for all types of crises that may arise.”
- increased funding for civil defense»Anslagen till de myndigheter som har övergripande ansvar för civilförsvar, krisledning och beredskap bör öka och stödet till civilorganisationer med samhällsuppdrag ska stärkas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Funding for authorities with overall responsibility for civil defense, crisis management and preparedness should increase and support for civil organizations with public missions should be strengthened.”
- strengthened state crisis management»Den operativa krisledningsförmågan behöver stärkas på Regeringskansliet och vid landets myndigheter, regioner och kommuner.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The operational crisis management capacity needs to be strengthened at the Government Offices and at the country's authorities, regions and municipalities.”
- the importance of civil defense»Ett välfungerande civilförsvar skapar förutsättningarna för det militära försvaret« (party programme ↗)“A well-functioning civil defense creates the conditions for military defense”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:FöU12)
- Committee report full text (HD01FöU12)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:182 — Tillträde till skyddsrum för sällskapsdjur av Victoria Tiblom (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:1965 — Plan för skyddsrum av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1969 — Tillgång till skyddsrum av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2025/26:227 — Operativa skyddsrum i Sverige av Björn Tidland (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:3336 — Skyddsrum och husdjur i beredskapsplaneringen av Marléne Lund Kopparklint (M)
- Motion 2025/26:3556 — Totalförsvarets beredskap av Peter Hultqvist m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:3931 — med anledning av prop. 2025/26:142 Ett starkare skydd för civilbefolkningen vid höjd beredskap av Hanna Gunnarsson m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:3935 — med anledning av prop. 2025/26:142 Ett starkare skydd för civilbefolkningen vid höjd beredskap av Peter Hultqvist m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:3938 — med anledning av prop. 2025/26:142 Ett starkare skydd för civilbefolkningen vid höjd beredskap av Mikael Larsson och Kerstin Lundgren (båda C)
- Motion 2025/26:3944 — med anledning av prop. 2025/26:142 Ett starkare skydd för civilbefolkningen vid höjd beredskap av Ulf Holm m.fl. (MP)
- Proposition 2025/26:142 — Ett starkare skydd för civilbefolkningen vid höjd beredskap
Source: The Swedish Parliament