2024-05-152023/24:MJU14 · p.9MJUEnvironment & agriculture

Lead ammunition

A general ban on lead in hunting ammunition

What's at stake: The outcome affects how quickly lead poisoning of birds of prey such as golden eagles and other scavengers can be reduced, but also what consequences hunters and sport shooters must live with while awaiting fully adequate lead-free ammunition.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is whether Sweden should work for a general ban on lead in hunting ammunition, both nationally and within the EU, or whether further restrictions should be introduced more restrictively and gradually.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee believes that further restrictions on lead ammunition must be introduced restrictively, taking into account the development of fully adequate lead-free shot, and welcomes the government's work on minimizing negative consequences for hunters and sport shooters, but does not back a total ban on lead ammunition either nationally or within the EU, and therefore rejects the motion.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 7 (V)

The dissenter points out that golden eagles and other scavengers are poisoned by lead from hunting ammunition in entrails and wounded animals, that the problem applies to all hunting and not just moose hunting, and wants the government to come back with proposals for a general ban on lead in hunting ammunition and to work for a corresponding ban within the EU.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 7 by V.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
Vown reservationNoNo 0/21/0/3follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
SNoYes 93/0/0/13departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
MPNoYes 16/0/0/2departs from the planconfidence: highderived
CYesYes 18/0/1/5follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
LNoYes 14/0/0/2departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
KDNoYes 17/0/0/2departs from the planconfidence: lowderived
MYesYes 60/0/0/8follows the planconfidence: highderived
SDYesYes 60/0/0/12follows the planconfidence: highexplicit

Broke with the party line

CHelena Lindahl (C, Västerbottens län)Abstain — party line: Yes

MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.

Committee proposal

The Riksdag rejects motion 2023/24:991 by Andrea Andersson Tay et al. (V) demands 28 and 29.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motion 2023/24:991 av Andrea Andersson Tay m.fl. (V) yrkandena 28 och 29.

Riksdag decision: The Riksdag calls on the Government, through a tillkännagivande (formal notice), to create a unified administration for hoofed game – for example moose and red deer – that takes into account the ecosystem. The purpose of a unified hoofed game administration should, among other things, be to manage wildlife populations, reduce damage to forests and crops, and minimize the number of traffic accidents with hoofed game. The Riksdag also decided to say no to 110 proposals in motions from the general motions period 2023 on hunting and wildlife management. The motions deal, among other things, with management of wolves and moose, review of the hunting law, measures against illegal hunting, lead ammunition and compensation for predator-repelling fences. The Riksdag believes that work is already underway in the areas that the motions address.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoNofollows the plannot addressed

The plan wants to see ambitious environmental goals that are monitored with strict legislation and comprehensive work for rich ecosystems.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants to see ambitious environmental goals that are monitored with strict legislation and comprehensive work for rich ecosystems. Protection of biological diversity is highlighted as urgent and is not subordinated to individual business interests. A general ban on lead in hunting ammunition, which poisons birds of prey and scavengers, is precisely such a strict measure and is therefore supported by the plan.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill se ambitiösa miljömål som följs upp med skarp lagstiftning och ett heltäckande arbete för rika ekosystem. Skyddet av den biologiska mångfalden lyfts som akut och underordnas inte enskilda näringsintressen. Ett generellt förbud mot bly i jaktammunition, som förgiftar rovfåglar och asätare, är en sådan skarp åtgärd och stöds därför av planen.

  • strict legislation for environmental goalsdecisive»miljömål som följs upp med skarp lagstiftning och praktiskt arbete.« (party programme ↗)“environmental goals that are monitored with strict legislation and practical work.”
  • protect biological diversity»Vi måste lösa klimatkrisen och skydda den biologiska mångfalden – omställningen går alldeles för sakta.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We must solve the climate crisis and protect biological diversity – the transition is going far too slowly.”
  • rich ecosystems»skapa goda villkor för rika ekosystem« (party programme ↗)“create good conditions for rich ecosystems”
  • holistic view before individual interests»reglering av skogsbruket, som utgår från en helhetssyn och inte« (party programme ↗)“regulation of forestry, which starts from a holistic view and not”
SSocialdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The election manifesto states that species extinction is accelerating and biological diversity is threatened, and the party programme requires that diversity be protected and that all environmental impacts in the form of emissions and waste products be minimised.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto states that species extinction is accelerating and biological diversity is threatened, and the party programme requires that diversity be protected and that all environmental impacts in the form of emissions and waste products be minimised. Lead residues that poison birds of prey are precisely such environmental impact. However, the plan does not address hunting ammunition, so confidence is low.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet konstaterar att artdöden accelererar och att den biologiska mångfalden hotas, och partiprogrammet kräver att mångfalden skyddas och att all miljöpåverkan i form av utsläpp och avfallsprodukter minimeras. Blyrester som förgiftar rovfåglar är just sådan miljöpåverkan. Planen tar dock inte upp jaktammunition, varför säkerheten är låg.

  • minimise environmental toxinsdecisive»miljöpåverkan i form av utsläpp och avfallsprodukter ska minimeras.« (party programme ↗)“environmental impacts in the form of emissions and waste products shall be minimised.”
  • protect biological diversity»biologiska mångfalden måste skyddas.« (party programme ↗)“biological diversity must be protected.”
  • halt species extinction»Samtidigt accelererar artdöden och den biologiska mångfalden hotas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“At the same time species extinction is accelerating and biological diversity is threatened.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MPMiljöpartietNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan wants to phase out toxic substances immediately and impose strict requirements to phase out environmentally damaging substances, and establishes that environmental toxins are a serious threat to both people and nature.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants to phase out toxic substances immediately and impose strict requirements to phase out environmentally damaging substances, and establishes that environmental toxins are a serious threat to both people and nature. Birds of prey and scavengers being poisoned by lead ammunition is precisely such a threat, and the precautionary principle should be applied when harm is threatened. The plan additionally establishes that nature conservation interests should take precedence in hunting, which supports the counter-proposal's requirement for a general lead ban.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill fasa ut giftiga ämnen omgående och ställa skarpa krav på att miljöskadliga ämnen fasas ut, och slår fast att miljögifter är ett allvarligt hot mot både människor och natur. Att rovfåglar och asätare förgiftas av blyammunition är precis ett sådant hot, och försiktighetsprincipen ska tillämpas när skada hotar. Planen slår dessutom fast att naturvårdsintressen ska ha företräde vid jakt, vilket bär motförslagets krav på ett generellt blyförbud.

  • nature conservation before hunting interestsdecisive»Det är viktigt att det ekologiska perspektivet sätts i fokus vid jakt och att naturvårdsintressen får företräde.« (party programme ↗)“It is important that the ecological perspective is put in focus in hunting and that nature conservation interests take precedence.”
  • phase out toxins»fasa ut giftiga ämnen omgående, speciellt från produkter för barn.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“phase out toxic substances immediately, especially from children's products.”
  • phase out environmentally damaging substances»Vi vill se skarpa krav på producenterna att kretsloppsanpassa nya produkter och fasa ut miljöskadliga ämnen.« (party programme ↗)“We want to see strict requirements on producers to adapt new products to the circular economy and phase out environmentally damaging substances.”
  • environmental toxins as a threat»Miljögifter är i dag ett allvarligt hot mot såväl människor som natur.« (party programme ↗)“Environmental toxins are today a serious threat to both people and nature.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

CCenterpartietYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The plan's nature conservation line is explicitly built on voluntary participation and ownership rights being the foundation for better nature conservation and on active management of wildlife together with landowners and hunters, not on general prohibitions.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan's nature conservation line is explicitly built on voluntary participation and ownership rights being the foundation for better nature conservation and on active management of wildlife together with landowners and hunters, not on general prohibitions. A total prohibition on lead in all hunting ammunition is exactly such a general intervention, and the plan moreover wants to clean up unnecessary regulations. The plan's requirement for a poison-free environment speaks the other way, but does not support a general prohibition.

Original (Swedish)

Planens naturvårdslinje bygger uttryckligen på att frivillighet och äganderätt är grunden för en bättre naturvård och på aktiv förvaltning av vilt tillsammans med markägare och jägare, inte på generella förbud. Ett totalförbud mot bly i all jaktammunition är just ett sådant generellt ingrepp, och planen vill dessutom rensa bland överflödiga regler. Planens krav på en giftfri miljö talar åt andra hållet, men bär inte ett generellt förbud.

  • voluntary before prohibitiondecisive»då frivillighet och äganderätt är grunden för en bättre naturvård.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“as voluntary participation and ownership rights are the foundation for better nature conservation.”
  • active wildlife management»en aktiv förvaltning av rovdjur och klövvilt« (party programme ↗)“active management of predators and hoofed game”
  • fewer rules»Vi ska rensa upp bland överflödiga regler och byråkrati.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We shall clean up unnecessary regulations and bureaucracy.”
  • poison-free environment»Tillgång till rent vatten, ren luft och giftfri miljö är en fundamental rätt för alla människor« (party programme ↗)“Access to clean water, clean air and a poison-free environment is a fundamental right for all people”
LLiberalernaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan requires that waste policy prevents and stops heavy metals and other dangerous substances from spreading in nature, which is exactly what lead ammunition in abandoned slaughter remains causes.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan requires that waste policy prevents and stops heavy metals and other dangerous substances from spreading in nature, which is exactly what lead ammunition in abandoned slaughter remains causes. Chemical policy shall furthermore be based on the precautionary principle and threatened species shall be protected, which supports a general ban both nationally and internationally. However, hunting ammunition is not explicitly mentioned.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver att avfallspolitiken förebygger och förhindrar att tungmetaller och andra farliga ämnen sprids i naturen, vilket är precis vad blyammunition i kvarlämnade slaktrester orsakar. Kemikaliepolitiken ska dessutom utgå från försiktighetsprincipen och hotade arter skyddas, vilket stöder ett generellt förbud både nationellt och internationellt. Jaktammunition nämns dock inte uttryckligen.

  • stop spread of heavy metalsdecisive»Avfallspolitiken måste förebygga och förhindra att tungmetaller, läkemedelsrester och andra farliga ämnen sprids i naturen.« (party programme ↗)“Waste policy must prevent and stop heavy metals, medication residues and other dangerous substances from spreading in nature.”
  • the precautionary principle»Kemikalielagstiftningen ska utgå från försiktighetsprincipen.« (party programme ↗)“Chemical legislation shall be based on the precautionary principle.”
  • protect threatened species»Hotade växter och djur ska skyddas genom fridlysning, information och biotopskydd.« (party programme ↗)“Threatened plants and animals shall be protected through protection orders, information and habitat protection.”
  • global phase-out cooperation»Det behövs ett globalt samarbete inom FN för att få bort användningen av de farligaste kemikalierna.« (party programme ↗)“There is a need for global cooperation within the UN to eliminate the use of the most dangerous chemicals.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

KDKristdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The substitution principle is an explicit tool in the plan: less dangerous substances shall as far as possible replace dangerous ones.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The substitution principle is an explicit tool in the plan: less dangerous substances shall as far as possible replace dangerous ones. Together with the precautionary principle in case of risk for irreversible environmental damage and responsibility for wild animals, it argues for lead in hunting ammunition to be removed. The qualification "as far as possible" and the plan's view of hunting and wildlife management as part of stewardship however make support for a general ban uncertain.

Original (Swedish)

Substitutionsprincipen är i planen ett uttalat verktyg: mindre farliga ämnen ska så långt möjligt ersätta farliga. Tillsammans med försiktighetsprincipen vid risk för oåterkallelig miljöskada och ansvaret för de vilda djuren talar det för att bly i jaktammunition ska bort. Kvalifikationen så långt möjligt och planens syn på jakt och viltvård som en del av förvaltarskapet gör dock stödet för ett generellt förbud osäkert.

  • the substitution principle replaces dangerous substancesdecisive»Substitutionsprincipen, som innebär att mindre farliga ämnen så långt möjligt ska ersätta farliga, är också ett viktigt verktyg.« (party programme ↗)“The substitution principle, which means that less dangerous substances as far as possible shall replace dangerous ones, is also an important tool.”
  • the precautionary principle in case of environmental threat»också att agerandet grundas på försiktighetsprincipen. Med detta menas att om misstanke finns om hot eller oåterkallelig skada på miljön, måste extra försiktighet tillämpas.« (party programme ↗)“also that action is grounded in the precautionary principle. With this is meant that if suspicion exists of threat or irreversible damage to the environment, extra caution must be applied.”
  • responsibility for wild animals»Människans ansvar omfattar också de vilda djuren. De ska alltid behandlas med hänsyn till sitt behov av ett naturligt liv.« (party programme ↗)“Humanity's responsibility also encompasses wild animals. They shall always be treated with consideration for their need for a natural life.”
  • hunting as stewardship»Jakt, fiske och viltvård är en del i bevarandet av den biologiska mångfalden.« (party programme ↗)“Hunting, fishing and wildlife management are part of preserving biological diversity.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MModeraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan's explicit commitment is that hunters, sport shooters and weapons collectors shall not be harmed negatively by regulations, and that hunting is an important part of culture and of viable wildlife populations.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan's explicit commitment is that hunters, sport shooters and weapons collectors shall not be harmed negatively by regulations, and that hunting is an important part of culture and of viable wildlife populations. A general ban on lead in hunting ammunition affects all hunting and thus stands in direct conflict with that commitment. The plan also wants EU rules implemented at minimum level, not over-implemented.

Original (Swedish)

Planens uttryckliga åtagande är att jägare, sportskyttar och vapensamlare inte ska drabbas negativt av regleringar, och att jakten är en viktig del av kulturen och av livskraftiga viltstammar. Ett generellt förbud mot bly i jaktammunition träffar all jakt och står därmed i direkt strid med det åtagandet. Planen vill dessutom att EU-regler genomförs på miniminivå, inte överimplementeras.

  • protect hunters from regulationsdecisive»Det är viktigt att EU:s vapendirektiv inte genomförs i svensk lagstiftning så att du som är jägare, sportskytt eller vapensamlare drabbas negativt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is important that the EU's firearms directive is not implemented in Swedish legislation so that you as a hunter, sport shooter or weapons collector are not harmed negatively.”
  • hunting as cultural heritage»Den svenska jakten är också en viktig del av vår kultur.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Swedish hunting is also an important part of our culture.”
  • hunters' role in wildlife management»Jägarnas insatser är en starkt bidragande orsak till att vi har livskraftiga viltstammar i landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Hunters' efforts are a strong contributing reason for us to have viable wildlife populations in the country.”
  • EU rules at minimum level»Minska regelkrånglet och onödig byråkrati, bland annat genom att motverka överimplementering i Sverige av EU-beslut – som huvudregel ska EU-direktiv genomföras på miniminivå« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Reduce red tape and unnecessary bureaucracy, among other things by countering over-implementation in Sweden of EU decisions - as a main rule, EU directives shall be implemented at minimum level”

flags: citat_migrerat

SDSverigedemokraternaYesYesfollows the planexplicit

The plan explicitly points out bans on lead in ammunition as an example of measures taken to make legal weapon ownership difficult, and wants to stop the persecution of hunters and legal weapon owners.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan explicitly points out bans on lead in ammunition as an example of measures taken to make legal weapon ownership difficult, and wants to stop the persecution of hunters and legal weapon owners. A general ban on lead in hunting ammunition is precisely the measure the plan rejects; the plan instead wants to facilitate hunting.

Original (Swedish)

Planen pekar uttryckligen ut förbud mot bly i ammunition som ett exempel på åtgärder som görs för att försvåra legalt vapenägande, och vill stoppa hetsjakten på jägare och legala vapeninnehavare. Ett generellt förbud mot bly i jaktammunition är precis den åtgärd planen avvisar; planen vill i stället underlätta jakten.

  • no to lead bans in ammunitiondecisive»Magasinsreglering och förbud mot bly i ammunition är exempel på åtgärder som görs för att försvåra legalt vapenägande.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Magazine regulations and bans on lead in ammunition are examples of measures taken to make legal weapon ownership difficult.”
  • protected legal weapon ownership»Stoppa hetsjakten på jägare och legala vapeninnehavare« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Stop the persecution of hunters and legal weapon owners”
  • criticism of weapons regulations»Sverigedemokraterna är mycket kritiska till implementeringen av EU:s vapendirektiv.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Sweden Democrats are very critical of the implementation of the EU's weapons directive.”
  • facilitated hunting»Underlätta jakt i områden med mycket vilt« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Facilitate hunting in areas with abundant wildlife”

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament