2025-05-142024/25:JuU17 · p.2JuUJustice
Requirements for shooting ranges
Protecting shooting ranges from restrictions
What's at stake: If shooting ranges are closed down or expensively rebuilt due to environmental or noise requirements, this affects the ability to pursue hunting and sport shooting and, according to the proposers, national-defence training activity, while reviewing the requirements could affect local protection against noise and environmental impact.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the government should review the rules for shooting ranges - including environmental requirements - to protect them from restrictions that affect hunting and sport shooting, or whether developments can be monitored without such a parliamentary statement.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee views positively that shooting ranges are functioning and can continue to develop, follows developments closely but finds no reason to back a review of the rules, and therefore rejects the motions.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 2 (C)
The reservation (C) points out that over 600,000 gun owners hunt or practise sport shooting, and that shooting ranges are increasingly being closed down or restricted for unreasonable reasons, such as costly rebuilding or complaining neighbours, even as national defence is being rebuilt. It wants the government to review how shooting ranges can be protected from restrictions that harm hunting and sport shooting and hamper their development.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 2 by C.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | Yes | Yes 21/0/0/3 | follows the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| S | No | Yes 92/1/0/13 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| MP | Yes | Yes 15/0/0/3 | follows the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| C | No | No 0/21/0/3 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 14/0/0/2 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| KD | No | Yes 16/0/0/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| M | No | Yes 60/0/0/8 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| SD | No | Yes 63/0/0/9 | departs from the plan | confidence: high | derived |
Broke with the party line
| SMikael Dahlqvist (S, Värmlands län) | No — party line: Yes |
MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2024/25:1532 by Marléne Lund Kopparklint (M) amendment 3 and 2024/25:3133 by Sten Bergheden (M).
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2024/25:1532 av Marléne Lund Kopparklint (M) yrkande 3 och 2024/25:3133 av Sten Bergheden (M).
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected approximately 20 proposals concerning weapons issues in motions from the general motion period 2024. The proposals deal with, among other things, the suitability of firearms for hunting, requirements for shooting ranges, and hunters' right to carry a knife in a vehicle. The Riksdag refers, among other things, to the fact that work is already underway within the Government Offices as a result of proposals submitted by the 2022 Weapons Investigation.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to protect shooting ranges from restrictions. (C) — Reservation 2
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan says nothing about shooting ranges, hunting or sport shooting.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan says nothing about shooting ranges, hunting or sport shooting. The closest principle is that the world needs to move towards peace, disarmament and fewer weapons in circulation, and the plan highlights the fight against access to firearms as part of crime prevention. A protection for shooting ranges motivated by built-up defence capacity has no support in the plan, which builds total defence on compulsory military service rather than on individual weapon ownership.
Original (Swedish)
Planen säger ingenting om skjutbanor, jakt eller sportskytte. Närmast liggande princip är att världen behöver gå mot fred, nedrustning och färre vapen i cirkulation, och planen lyfter kampen mot tillgången till skjutvapen som en del av brottsbekämpningen. Ett skydd för skjutbanor motiverat med uppbyggd försvarsförmåga har inget stöd i planen, som bygger totalförsvaret på allmän värnplikt snarare än på enskilt vapeninnehav.
- disarmament and fewer weaponsdecisive»Världen behöver gå mot fred, nedrustning« (party programme ↗)“The world needs to move towards peace, disarmament”
- limited weapons access»kamp mot tillgången till illegala skjutvapen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“fight against access to illegal firearms”
- total defence on conscription»Vi vill se ett modernt totalförsvar byggt på allmän värnplikt, med en« (party programme ↗)“We want to see a modern total defence built on compulsory military service, with a”
The plan says nothing about shooting ranges, hunting or sport shooting.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan says nothing about shooting ranges, hunting or sport shooting. The closest commitments are the party programme's requirements for suitable and accessible facilities for voluntary organisations and sport, and the election manifesto's line to build a strong popular defence with increased pace of rearmament, which speaks for the conditions of shooting ranges being reviewed rather than restricted. Therefore, the conclusion is uncertain.
Original (Swedish)
Planen säger ingenting om skjutbanor, jakt eller sportskytte. Närmast liggande åtaganden är partiprogrammets krav på ändamålsenliga och tillgängliga lokaler för föreningsliv och idrott samt valmanifestets linje att bygga ett starkt folkförsvar med ökad takt i upprustningen, vilket talar för att skyttebanornas villkor ses över snarare än inskränks. Slutsatsen är därför osäker.
- accessible facilities for voluntary organisationsdecisive»Ändamålsenliga lokaler för föreningsliv, folkbildning, idrott och« (party programme ↗)“Suitable facilities for voluntary organisations, popular education, sport and”
- strong popular defence»Sverige behöver bygga ett starkt folkförsvar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden needs to build a strong popular defence.”
- increased pace of rearmament»Takten i upprustningen ska öka ytterligare.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The pace of rearmament should increase further.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan says nothing about shooting ranges or conditions for sport shooting.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan says nothing about shooting ranges or conditions for sport shooting. The closest principle is that the ecological perspective should be put in focus for hunting and that animal welfare aspects should be considered, that is, that nature conservation and environmental considerations should take precedence over hunting interests. Therefore, specifically protecting shooting ranges from environmental and environmental requirements has no support in the plan, but the conclusion rests on weak ground.
Original (Swedish)
Planen säger ingenting om skjutbanor eller villkoren för sportskytte. Den närmaste principen är att det ekologiska perspektivet ska sättas i fokus vid jakt och att djurskyddsaspekter ska beaktas, alltså att naturvårds- och miljöhänsyn ges företräde framför jaktintressets villkor. Att särskilt skydda skjutbanor mot miljö- och omgivningskrav har därför inget stöd i planen, men slutsatsen vilar på svagt underlag.
- ecological perspective in huntingdecisive»Det är viktigt att det ekologiska perspektivet sätts i« (party programme ↗)“It is important that the ecological perspective is put in”
- animal welfare in hunting»Även djurskyddsaspekter ska beaktas.« (party programme ↗)“Animal welfare aspects should also be considered.”
The plan wants to clean up unnecessary regulations and bureaucracy that lie like a wet blanket over the countryside, and shooting ranges closed for unreasonable reasons are exactly such a regulatory burden for hunting and sport shooting.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to clean up unnecessary regulations and bureaucracy that lie like a wet blanket over the countryside, and shooting ranges closed for unreasonable reasons are exactly such a regulatory burden for hunting and sport shooting. The plan also requires that the military be rapidly and powerfully armed and that civil defense be strengthened, which presupposes functioning shooting ranges. A review of how the ranges can be protected is therefore in line with the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill rensa upp bland överflödiga regler och byråkrati som ligger som en våt filt över landsbygden, och skjutbanor som stängs av oskäliga skäl är just en sådan regelbörda för jakt och sportskytte. Planen kräver dessutom att försvaret rustas snabbt och kraftfullt och att civilförsvaret stärks, vilket förutsätter fungerande skjutbanor. En översyn av hur banorna kan skyddas ligger därför i linje med planen.
- clean up complicated rulesdecisive»Dyra, krångliga och innovationshämmande regelverk ligger som en våt filt över delar av landsbygden. Vi ska rensa upp bland överflödiga regler och byråkrati.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Expensive, complicated and innovation-inhibiting regulations lie like a wet blanket over parts of the countryside. We shall clean up unnecessary regulations and bureaucracy.”
- arm the military»Sverige ska försvaras. Vi vill rusta det militära försvaret snabbt, kraftfullt och långsiktigt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden shall be defended. We want to arm the military rapidly, powerfully and sustainably.”
- strengthened civil defense»Även det civila försvaret är livsviktigt. Vi måste rusta civilförsvaret och samhällets beredskap inför krig och kris.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Civil defense too is vital. We must arm civil defense and strengthen society's preparedness for war and crisis.”
- the countryside's conditions»Kampen för landsbygdens villkor har varit en grundbult i Centerpartiets politik sedan vi grundades, ett arv vi vårdar och vidareutvecklar än idag.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The fight for the countryside's conditions has been a cornerstone of the Centre Party's politics since we were founded, a legacy we tend and develop today.”
The plan says nothing about shooting ranges, hunting or sport shooting.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan says nothing about shooting ranges, hunting or sport shooting. The closest principle is that more armed than today shall undergo basic military training as part of strengthening overall defence capacity, which presupposes that functioning shooting ranges exist. The plan furthermore wants the state to cooperate with landowners and local population in wildlife management, which speaks for a review of how the ranges can be protected rather than against it. The conclusion is uncertain since the basis is only neighbouring principles.
Original (Swedish)
Planen säger ingenting om skjutbanor, jakt eller sportskytte. Den närmast liggande principen är att fler vapenföra än i dag ska genomgå grundläggande militär utbildning som en del av en stärkt samlad försvarsförmåga, vilket förutsätter att det finns fungerande skjutbanor. Planen vill dessutom att staten samverkar med markägare och lokalbefolkning i viltförvaltningen, vilket talar för en översyn av hur banorna kan skyddas snarare än mot den. Slutsatsen är osäker eftersom underlaget bara är närliggande principer.
- more shall receive military trainingdecisive»För att stärka Sveriges samlade försvarsförmåga ska fler vapenföra än i dag genomgå en grundläggande militär utbildning.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“To strengthen Sweden's overall defence capacity more armed than today shall undergo basic military training.”
- cooperation in wildlife management»markägare och lokalbefolkning i naturvård och viltförvaltning.« (party programme ↗)“landowners and local population in nature conservation and wildlife management.”
- protected freedom to roam»Allemansrätten ska värnas.« (party programme ↗)“Freedom to roam shall be protected.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The party programme counts hunting, fishing and wildlife management as part of preserving biological diversity and as applied stewardship, and links hunting rights to land ownership.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme counts hunting, fishing and wildlife management as part of preserving biological diversity and as applied stewardship, and links hunting rights to land ownership. If shooting ranges are closed for unjustified reasons, the opportunity to exercise hunting and sports shooting is undermined, and a review of how the ranges can be protected therefore follows from the plan's position. Wildlife management according to the plan moreover has a practical utility that presupposes functioning hunting.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet räknar jakt, fiske och viltvård som en del av bevarandet av den biologiska mångfalden och som tillämpat förvaltarskap, och kopplar jakträtten till markägandet. Om skjutbanor läggs ned av oskäliga skäl undergrävs möjligheten att utöva jakt och sportskytte, och en översyn av hur banorna kan skyddas följer därför av planens hållning. Viltvården har enligt planen dessutom en praktisk nytta som förutsätter fungerande jakt.
- hunting as stewardshipdecisive»Jakt, fiske och viltvård är en del i bevarandet av den biologiska mångfalden.« (party programme ↗)“Hunting, fishing and wildlife management are part of preserving biological diversity.”
- land ownership linked to hunting rights»bör kopplingen mellan markägande och jakt- och fiskerätt finnas.« (party programme ↗)“should the connection between land ownership and hunting and fishing rights exist.”
- wildlife management's utility»Viltvård är viktig för att undvika sjukdomar, trafikolyckor samt skador på jordbruksgrödor och skog.« (party programme ↗)“Wildlife management is important to prevent diseases, traffic accidents and damage to agricultural crops and forest.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan commits to safeguarding hunters and sport shooters against rules that harm them negatively and to shortening processing times for weapon licenses.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan commits to safeguarding hunters and sport shooters against rules that harm them negatively and to shortening processing times for weapon licenses. The counter-proposal's requirement for a review of how shooting ranges are protected against restrictions that harm hunting and sport shooting aligns directly with that commitment. The plan therefore supports the demand in substance.
Original (Swedish)
Planen åtar sig att värna jägare och sportskyttar mot regler som drabbar dem negativt och att korta handläggningstiderna för vapenlicenser. Motförslagets krav på en översyn av hur skjutbanor skyddas mot inskränkningar som drabbar jakt och sportskytte ligger direkt i linje med det åtagandet. Planen stöder därför kravet i sak.
- protection for hunters and sport shootersdecisive»Det är viktigt att EU:s vapendirektiv inte genomförs i svensk lagstiftning så att du som är jägare, sportskytt eller vapensamlare drabbas negativt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is important that the EU's firearms directive is not implemented in Swedish legislation so that you as a hunter, sport shooter or weapons collector are not harmed negatively.”
- simpler rules for weapon owners»Arbeta för kortade handläggningstider för vapenlicenser« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Work for shortened processing times for weapons licenses”
- hunting as cultural heritage»Den svenska jakten är också en viktig del av vår kultur.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Swedish hunting is also an important part of our culture.”
- hunters' role in wildlife management»Jägarnas insatser är en starkt bidragande orsak till att vi har livskraftiga viltstammar i landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Hunters' efforts are a strong contributing reason for us to have viable wildlife populations in the country.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan's decisive commitment is to stop the persecution of hunters and legal weapon owners and to protect the possibility of owning hunting weapons and engaging in hunting.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's decisive commitment is to stop the persecution of hunters and legal weapon owners and to protect the possibility of owning hunting weapons and engaging in hunting. It states that measures that should have been directed at illegal weapons have instead been directed at Swedish hunters and sport shooters. A review of how shooting ranges are protected against restrictions that affect hunting and sport shooting follows directly from this.
Original (Swedish)
Planens avgörande åtagande är att stoppa hetsjakten på jägare och legala vapeninnehavare och att värna möjligheten att äga jaktvapen och ägna sig åt jakt. Den slår fast att åtgärder som borde riktats mot illegala vapen i stället riktats mot svenska jägare och sportskyttar. En översyn av hur skjutbanor skyddas mot inskränkningar som drabbar jakt och sportskytte följer direkt av detta.
- protect legal weapon ownersdecisive»Stoppa hetsjakten på jägare och legala vapeninnehavare« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Stop the persecution of hunters and legal weapon owners”
- wrong measures against legal shooters»Samtidigt har politiska åtgärder som borde riktats mot illegala vapen och gängbrottslighet istället riktats mot legalt vapeninnehav, svenska jägare och sportskyttar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“At the same time, political measures that should have been directed at illegal weapons and gang crime have instead been directed at legal weapon ownership, Swedish hunters and sport shooters.”
- protect hunting»Möjligheten att äga jaktvapen och att ägna sig åt jakt ska värnas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The possibility of owning hunting weapons and engaging in hunting should be protected.”
- protection against disturbances to hunting»Straffen bör höjas för de personer och grupper som trakasserar jägare och stör jakten.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Penalties should be increased for those individuals and groups who harass hunters and disturb hunting.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2024/25:JuU17)
- Committee report full text (HC01JuU17)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2024/25:1532 — Sportskytte och jakt av Marléne Lund Kopparklint (M)
- Motion 2024/25:1535 — Förvaring av vapen i annans vapenskåp av Helena Storckenfeldt (M)
- Motion 2024/25:1539 — Vapenlagen för jakt- och sportskyttar av Marléne Lund Kopparklint (M)
- Motion 2024/25:1820 — En uppdaterad vapenlag för jägare och sportskyttar av Emma Ahlström Köster (M)
- Motion 2024/25:1825 — Förvaring av äldre vapen utan vapentillstånd av Emma Ahlström Köster m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2024/25:1929 — Rättsväsendet av Gudrun Nordborg m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2024/25:1995 — Etablerandet av en ny myndighet för jakt- och viltförvaltningsfrågor av Erik Ottoson (M)
- Motion 2024/25:2114 — Jakt på egen hand från det år man fyller 16 år av Lars Beckman (M)
- Motion 2024/25:2306 — Vapenlicens och digital teknik av Johan Löfstrand m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2024/25:2584 — Tydliggörande av bestämmelser för återkallande av vapenlicens av Crister Carlsson och Malin Höglund (båda M)
- Motion 2024/25:271 — Digitala vapenlicenser som ett komplement till papperslicenser av Kjell-Arne Ottosson (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:2953 — Jord, skog och jakt av Helena Lindahl m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2024/25:3045 — Jaktetik och ekosystembaserad jakt av Emma Nohrén m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2024/25:3111 — Utgiftsområde 4 Rättsväsendet av Teresa Carvalho m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2024/25:3120 — Förvaring av vapen på annan adress än folkbokföringsadressen av Eric Westroth (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:3133 — Kraven runt skjutbanor av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2024/25:376 — Fler vapen i vapengarderoben av Mathias Bengtsson (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:382 — Licens på enhandsvapen för eftersök och jakt av Magnus Persson (SD)
Source: The Swedish Parliament