2026-03-112025/26:KU28 · p.16KUConstitution
Foreign financing of religious activities
Foreign funding of religious activities
What's at stake: Foreign funding of religious communities linked to islamism and extremism is a sensitive issue touching both religious freedom and national security, and the decision affects how quickly any new rules could be put in place.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether parliament should already now call on the government to prioritize rules against foreign funding of religious communities, or whether the outcome of the ongoing inquiry should be awaited.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee notes that the government has already commissioned an inquiry into foreign funding of religious communities and other activities linked to islamism and extremism, considers that the outcome of the inquiry should be awaited, and therefore rejects the motions on foreign funding, halting religious activities, and a strategy against political islamism.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 12 (S)
The reservation looks forward to the inquiry's proposals but wants parliament to already now call on the government to prioritize work on rules that ban or counter foreign funding of religious communities, as part of a broader line ensuring that organizations operating in Sweden do not work against democratic principles.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 12 by S.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have gone the other way
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: LLiberalerna, SDSverigedemokraterna
Ja 205–90Nej 130–165
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | Yes | Yes 18/0/0/4 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| S | No | No 0/89/0/17 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| MP | Yes | Yes 15/0/0/3 | match | confidence: low | not addressed |
| C | Yes | Yes 21/0/0/3 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 13/0/0/3 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| KD | No | Yes 16/0/0/3 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| M | No | Yes 56/0/0/12 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| SD | No | Yes 62/0/0/9 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2025/26:566 by Richard Jomshof (SD) claims 1 and 2, 2025/26:3057 by Noria Manouchi (M) claim 1, 2025/26:3062 by Noria Manouchi (M) claim 5, 2025/26:3459 by Björn Wiechel et al. (S) claim 58 and 2025/26:3576 by Christian Carlsson (KD) claim 2.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2025/26:566 av Richard Jomshof (SD) yrkandena 1 och 2, 2025/26:3057 av Noria Manouchi (M) yrkande 1, 2025/26:3062 av Noria Manouchi (M) yrkande 5, 2025/26:3459 av Björn Wiechel m.fl. (S) yrkande 58 och 2025/26:3576 av Christian Carlsson (KD) yrkande 2.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected some 60 proposals in motions from the general motion period 2025 concerning freedoms and rights. The proposals deal with, among other things, threats due to religious belief and threats against elected officials, faith communities' security and safety work, protection of property rights, ban on racist organizations and protection of academic freedom. The Riksdag refers to, among other things, previous positions and ongoing work.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants an investigation to examine freedom of association in relation to racist and Nazi organizations. (S) — Reservation 12
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan guarantees religious freedom and commits the party to defending the rights of vulnerable groups, with Muslims explicitly mentioned, and warns against strategic racism being used as a political tool.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan guarantees religious freedom and commits the party to defending the rights of vulnerable groups, with Muslims explicitly mentioned, and warns against strategic racism being used as a political tool. To prioritize specific rules against foreign financing of faith communities with reference to Islamism points in the opposite direction to these commitments. The plan's tools against undemocratic activities are general transparency, not religion-targeted rules.
Original (Swedish)
Planen garanterar religionsfriheten och förbinder partiet att försvara utsatta gruppers rättigheter, med muslimer uttryckligen nämnda, samt varnar för att strategisk rasism används som politiskt verktyg. Att prioritera särskilda regler mot utländsk finansiering av trossamfund med hänvisning till islamism pekar i motsatt riktning mot dessa åtaganden. Planens verktyg mot odemokratiska verksamheter är generell insyn, inte religionsriktade regler.
- guaranteed religious freedomdecisive»garanteras och staten ska vara sekulär« (party programme ↗)“guaranteed and the state shall be secular”
- defend vulnerable groups»just den här gången handlar om sjukskrivna, muslimer eller transpersoner.« (party programme ↗)“just this time it is about the sick-listed, Muslims or transgender people.”
- warning against strategic racism»Strategisk rasism har länge varit en del av högerns retoriska och politi« (party programme ↗)“Strategic racism has long been part of the right's rhetorical and political”
- general transparency instead»Vi vill gå mot en större samhällelig insyn« (party programme ↗)“We want to move towards greater social transparency”
The plan requires that corruption and improper influence be prevented, that democratic institutions be protected and that violent extremism be combated.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that corruption and improper influence be prevented, that democratic institutions be protected and that violent extremism be combated. Rules against foreign financing of religious congregations are a measure against precisely such improper influence on activities in Sweden. That the election manifesto wants to ban new religious independent schools shows that the party is prepared to legislate to limit religious influence when democratic principles are at stake.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att korruption och otillbörlig påverkan förhindras, att de demokratiska institutionerna skyddas och att våldsbejakande extremism bekämpas. Regler mot utländsk finansiering av trossamfund är en åtgärd mot just sådan otillbörlig påverkan på verksamheter i Sverige. Att valmanifestet vill förbjuda nya religiösa friskolor visar att partiet är berett att lagstifta för att begränsa religiös påverkan när demokratiska principer står på spel.
- stop improper influencedecisive»Förhindrande av korruption och otillbörlig påverkan.« (party programme ↗)“Prevention of corruption and improper influence.”
- combated extremism»Bekämpande av våldsbejakande extremism och förhindrande av terrordåd.« (party programme ↗)“Combating violent extremism and preventing acts of terrorism.”
- protection of democracy»De demokratiska institutionerna måste skyddas.« (party programme ↗)“Democratic institutions must be protected.”
- limited religious influence»Därför vill vi förbjuda nya religiösa friskolor.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Therefore we want to ban new religious independent schools.”
The plan defends freedom of religion and every person's right to exercise their faith and explicitly warns against civil society being cast under suspicion and silenced.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan defends freedom of religion and every person's right to exercise their faith and explicitly warns against civil society being cast under suspicion and silenced. Hurrying to implement rules targeting faith communities' financing goes against that stance and against the requirement that support and conditions for civil society be long-term and clear. The question of foreign financing is not directly addressed, therefore low certainty.
Original (Swedish)
Planen försvarar religionsfriheten och varje människas rätt att utöva sin trosuppfattning och varnar uttryckligen för att civilsamhället misstänkliggörs och tystas. Att nu skynda på regler riktade mot trossamfundens finansiering går emot den hållningen och mot kravet att stöd och villkor för civilsamhället ska vara långsiktiga och tydliga. Frågan om utländsk finansiering behandlas inte direkt, därför låg säkerhet.
- civil society shall not be cast under suspiciondecisive»i Sverige ser vi prov på hur civilsamhället misstänkliggörs och tystas av krafter som vill« (party programme ↗)“in Sweden we see evidence of civil society being cast under suspicion and silenced by forces that want”
- freedom of religion»behöver ständigt försvaras. Vi står upp för varje människas rätt att utöva sin« (party programme ↗)“must constantly be defended. We stand up for every person's right to exercise their”
- counteract Islamophobia»Arbetet mot all typ av rasism måste stärkas. Antisemitism, islamofobi och afrofobi är« (party programme ↗)“Work against all kinds of racism must be strengthened. Antisemitism, Islamophobia and Afrophobia are”
- clear conditions for civil society»Stöd och villkor för civilsamhället måste vara långsiktiga och tydliga« (party programme ↗)“Support and conditions for civil society must be long-term and clear”
The election manifesto explicitly says no to restrictions on freedom of religion, and the party programme makes freedom of religion and association inviolable principles where policy should support civil society rather than control it.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto explicitly says no to restrictions on freedom of religion, and the party programme makes freedom of religion and association inviolable principles where policy should support civil society rather than control it. Rules against foreign financing of faith communities directly interfere with the communities' activities. The party certainly wants to strengthen resilience against external influence, but that commitment applies to political parties. The plan therefore rejects the counter-proposal.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet säger uttryckligen nej till inskränkningar av religionsfriheten, och partiprogrammet gör religions- och föreningsfriheten till orubbliga principer där politiken ska stödja civilsamhället snarare än styra det. Regler mot utländsk finansiering av trossamfund griper direkt in i samfundens verksamhet. Partiet vill visserligen rusta motståndskraften mot yttre påverkan, men det åtagandet gäller de politiska partierna. Planen avvisar därför motförslaget.
- no to restricted freedom of religiondecisive»Vi säger därför nej till visitationszoner, kollektiv bestraffning, omvänd bevisbörda, anonyma vittnen, preventiv avlyssning och inskränkningar av religionsfriheten.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We therefore say no to search zones, collective punishment, reversed burden of proof, anonymous witnesses, preventive eavesdropping and restrictions on freedom of religion.”
- inviolable freedom of religion»Yttrandefrihet, religionsfrihet och föreningsfrihet är därför orubbliga« (party programme ↗)“Freedom of expression, freedom of religion and freedom of association are therefore inviolable”
- support rather than control»Politiken kan stödja civilsamhället genom att involvera det i fler processer« (party programme ↗)“Policy can support civil society by involving it in more processes”
- protection against external influence»Reglerna för finansiering av politiska partier bör skärpas och deras motståndskraft mot yttre påverkan och infiltration rustas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The rules for financing of political parties should be strengthened and their resilience against external influence and infiltration enhanced.”
The plan explicitly requires that hidden financing of faith communities is stopped so they do not become tools for extremist forces, and that follow-up of grant-giving is strengthened.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly requires that hidden financing of faith communities is stopped so they do not become tools for extremist forces, and that follow-up of grant-giving is strengthened. It also wants to prevent foreign non-democratic actors from having influence in Sweden. The counter-proposal's demand that work on rules against foreign financing is prioritized now therefore aligns directly with the plan's direction.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver uttryckligen att dold finansiering av trossamfund stoppas så att de inte blir verktyg för extremistiska krafter, och att uppföljningen av bidragsgivning stärks. Den vill också hindra utländska icke-demokratiska aktörer från inflytande i Sverige. Motförslagets krav på att arbetet med regler mot utländsk finansiering prioriteras redan nu ligger därmed direkt i planens linje.
- stop hidden financingdecisive»Vi vill både stärka uppföljningen av bidragsgivning och stoppa dold finansiering av trossamfund så att de inte blir verktyg för extremistiska krafter.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to both strengthen follow-up of grant-giving and stop hidden financing of faith communities so they do not become tools for extremist forces.”
- stop undemocratic foreign actors»Vi vill sätta stopp för religiösa friskolor och hindra utländska icke-demokratiska aktörer från att äga skolor i Sverige.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to put an end to religious free schools and prevent foreign non-democratic actors from owning schools in Sweden.”
- no funds for anti-democrats»Inga skattemedel ska gå till verksamheter som vill förändra det demokratiska samhället med« (party programme ↗)“No tax money shall go to activities that want to change the democratic society with”
- counter Islamism»Islamister och kriminella klaner spär på segregationen och hotar sammanhållningen i Sverige.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Islamists and criminal gangs reinforce segregation and threaten cohesion in Sweden.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The election manifesto points out that there are areas where Islamist extremists have decisive influence on community life, and the party programme conditions public support to religious communities on the activity being in accordance with human dignity.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto points out that there are areas where Islamist extremists have decisive influence on community life, and the party programme conditions public support to religious communities on the activity being in accordance with human dignity. Religious freedom must never mean that other people are violated in faith's name. That rules against foreign financing of religious communities are prioritized follows from these commitments, with the plan's requirement for freedom from state control as a limit.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet pekar ut att det finns områden där islamistiska extremister har avgörande påverkan på samhällslivet, och partiprogrammet villkorar offentligt stöd till trossamfund vid att verksamheten står i överensstämmelse med människovärdet. Religionsfriheten får aldrig medföra att andra människor kränks i trons namn. Att prioritera regler mot utländsk finansiering av trossamfund följer av dessa åtaganden, med planens krav på frihet från statlig styrning som gräns.
- extremism affects community lifedecisive»Det finns också områden där islamistiska extremister har en avgörande påverkan på samhällslivet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“There are also areas where Islamist extremists have decisive influence on community life.”
- support conditioned on values»till de trossamfund som bedriver verksamhet vars karaktär och ändamål står i« (party programme ↗)“to religious communities whose activity is in accordance with”
- religious freedom with limits»Friheten att utöva sin religiösa tro får dock aldrig medföra att« (party programme ↗)“Freedom to practice one's religious faith must never mean that”
- communities free from state control»utvecklas i frihet utan statlig styrning« (party programme ↗)“developed in freedom without state control”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan commits to stopping payments to extremists and organizations that do not share society's fundamental democratic values, and to strengthening democracy's protection against violence-affirming extremism.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan commits to stopping payments to extremists and organizations that do not share society's fundamental democratic values, and to strengthening democracy's protection against violence-affirming extremism. Prioritizing rules against foreign financing of religious communities with links to Islamism and extremism serves the same purpose. Foreign financing is not mentioned in the documents, which is why the conclusion is derived from these commitments.
Original (Swedish)
Planen åtar sig att stoppa utbetalningar till extremister och till organisationer som inte delar samhällets grundläggande demokratiska värderingar, och att stärka demokratins skydd mot våldsbejakande extremism. Att prioritera regler mot utländsk finansiering av trossamfund med koppling till islamism och extremism tjänar samma syfte. Just utländsk finansiering nämns inte i dokumenten, varför slutsatsen härleds ur dessa åtaganden.
- no funds to democracy-hostiledecisive»• Stoppa utbetalningar av skattepengar till organisationer som inte delar det svenska samhällets grundläggande demokratiska värderingar utan som hotar människors frihet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Stop payments of tax money to organizations that do not share Swedish society's fundamental democratic values but threaten people's freedom”
- stop support to extremists»• Stoppa utbetalningar av skattemedel till extremister« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Stop payments of tax funds to extremists”
- protection against extremism»Vi måste också stärka demokratins skydd mot våldsbejakande extremism och andra kriminella hot.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We must also strengthen democracy's protection against violence-affirming extremism and other criminal threats.”
- strengthened security police»• Stärka Säkerhetspolisen för att öka deras förmåga att skydda den liberala demokratin och landets alla medborgare« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen the Security Police to increase their ability to protect liberal democracy and the country's all citizens”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan explicitly requires that foreign financing of extremist religious communities and organizations should be prevented and states that Islamist extremism is financed through public funds and foreign donations.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly requires that foreign financing of extremist religious communities and organizations should be prevented and states that Islamist extremism is financed through public funds and foreign donations. The counter-proposal's requirement that work on rules against foreign financing of religious communities be prioritized now is precisely this commitment. The plan moreover wants to combat Islamism and stop public grants to communities that promote extremism.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver uttryckligen att utländsk finansiering av extremistiska trossamfund och organisationer ska hindras och konstaterar att den islamistiska extremismen finansieras genom statliga medel och utländska donationer. Motförslagets krav på att arbetet med regler mot utländsk finansiering av trossamfund prioriteras nu är exakt detta åtagande. Planen vill dessutom bekämpa islamism och stoppa offentliga bidrag till samfund som verkar för extremism.
- stop foreign financingdecisive»Hindra utländsk finansiering av extremistiska trossamfund och organisationer« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Prevent foreign financing of extremist religious communities and organizations”
- extremism financed from abroad»Samtidigt vet vi att den islamistiska extremismen finansieras både genom statliga medel, och utländska donationer.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“At the same time we know that Islamist extremism is financed through both public funds and foreign donations.”
- no grants to extremist communities»Moskéer och andra trossamfund eller organisationer som verkar för extremism ska vare sig få bidrag från det offentliga eller utländska regimer.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Mosques and other religious communities or organizations that promote extremism should receive neither grants from the public nor from foreign regimes.”
- combat Islamism»Bekämpa islamism« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Combat Islamism”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:KU28)
- Committee report full text (HD01KU28)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:1097 — Grundlagsskydd av hbtqi-personers rättigheter av Anna Lasses (C)
- Motion 2025/26:1392 — Stärkt äganderätt av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2025/26:14 — Fackförbund utan partikoppling av Josef Fransson (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:1468 — Översyn av gränsen för yttrandefriheten, hets mot folkgrupp och författningsskydd av Magnus Jacobsson (KD)
- Motion 2025/26:1520 — Utvärdering och förtydligande av religionsfrihetens gränser för att motverka normkollisioner och värna det öppna samhället av Emma Ahlström Köster (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1524 — Stärkt demokrati - mot hot och förföljelse av förtroendevalda, tjänstemän och minoriteter av Emma Ahlström Köster (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1693 — Risk för försvagad yttrandefrihet i en föränderlig tid av Staffan Eklöf (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:1718 — Utökade möjligheter för kommuner att stoppa moskébyggen av Jonas Andersson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:1739 — Nationellt förbud mot offentlig religiös förkunnelse av Jan Ericson (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1745 — Strategi mot politisk islamism i Sverige av Jan Ericson m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1782 — Grundlagsskydd av äganderätten av Jan Ericson m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1866 — Verktyg för kontroll av finansiering av religiös verksamhet av Magnus Resare (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2488 — Stärkt äganderätt av Jesper Skalberg Karlsson (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2567 — Förbud mot framträdande religiösa tecken och klädsel i skola och offentlig sektor av Merit Frost Lindberg och Fredrik Kärrholm (båda M)
- Motion 2025/26:2785 — Akademisk frihet av Nadja Awad m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:2790 — Konstitutionella frågor av Jessica Wetterling m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:2808 — Rättvist förfarande vid arbetstvister av Markus Wiechel och Alexander Christiansson (båda SD)
- Motion 2025/26:2911 — Stärkt äganderätt i Sverige av Adam Reuterskiöld m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2025/26:3057 — Finansiering av religiösa organisationer av Noria Manouchi (M)
- Motion 2025/26:3062 — Förbud och begränsningar i fråga om våldsbejakande extremism av Noria Manouchi (M)
Source: The Swedish Parliament