2025-04-232024/25:KrU6 · p.1KrUCulture
Culture across the country
Resources for the regional culture-cooperation model and nationwide access to culture
What's at stake: The model governs how state cultural funds are distributed to the regions and thus affects how much culture is available locally, including for art forms such as visual and design art, that the motions argue are currently disadvantaged.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the regional culture-cooperation model needs more resources and further development to give people across the country better access to culture, or whether the development work already under way is enough.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee shares the view that people across the country should be able to take part in culture and welcomes the ongoing work to develop the regional culture-cooperation model through administrative simplification and reduced central control, and therefore rejects the motions with reference to this ongoing work.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 1 (MP)
The reservation wants to make the pandemic-era culture recovery support permanent, allocate more funds to the regional culture-cooperation model since its funding has been eroded over time, and task the Arts Council with strengthening the infrastructure for visual and design art, which an inquiry found to be neglected and disadvantaged under the current model.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by MP.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have held
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: SSocialdemokraterna, VVänsterpartiet
Ja 285–15Ja 171–129
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Yes 21/0/0/3 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| S | No | Yes 93/0/0/13 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| MP | No | No 0/15/0/3 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
| C | No | Yes 19/0/1/4 | differs | confidence: low | derived |
| L | No | Yes 13/0/0/3 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| KD | No | Yes 16/0/0/3 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| M | Yes | Yes 60/0/0/8 | match | confidence: low | not addressed |
| SD | Yes | Yes 62/0/0/10 | match | confidence: low | derived |
Broke with the party line
| CHelena Lindahl (C, Västerbottens län) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.
Committee proposal
Parliament rejects the motions 2024/25:1774 by Mats Berglund et al. (MP) provisions 1 and 16, 2024/25:1902 by Anders Ådahl (C) provisions 1 and 2, 2024/25:2617 by Elin Söderberg et al. (MP) provisions 16 and 17, and 2024/25:3057 by Elin Söderberg et al. (MP) provisions 22 and 23.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2024/25:1774 av Mats Berglund m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 1 och 16, 2024/25:1902 av Anders Ådahl (C) yrkandena 1 och 2, 2024/25:2617 av Elin Söderberg m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 16 och 17 samt 2024/25:3057 av Elin Söderberg m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 22 och 23.
Riksdag decision: Parliament rejected approximately 80 proposals from the general motion period 2024 regarding access to culture and cultural creators' conditions. The proposals concern, for example, access to culture, culture for young people, and cultural creators' conditions. Parliament refers, among other things, to the fact that work is already underway in the areas covered by the proposals.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to make permanent support for culture and increase public funding for regional cultural activities throughout the country. (MP) — Reservation 1
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The election manifesto establishes that culture is part of welfare and should exist throughout the country, and that cultural life has been impoverished when institutions disappear from more places.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto establishes that culture is part of welfare and should exist throughout the country, and that cultural life has been impoverished when institutions disappear from more places. The counter-proposal's requirement for permanent support, more funding for the cooperation model and a strengthened infrastructure for visual and applied art are concrete expressions of that commitment. The party programme also requires good economic conditions for both institutions and free culture.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet slår fast att kulturen är en del av välfärden och ska finnas i hela landet, och att kulturlivet utarmats när institutioner försvinner från fler orter. Motförslagets krav på permanentade stöd, mer medel till samverkansmodellen och en stärkt infrastruktur för bild- och formkonst är konkreta uttryck för det åtagandet. Partiprogrammet kräver dessutom goda ekonomiska villkor för både institutioner och den fria kulturen.
- culture throughout the countrydecisive»Det är viktigt att kulturen står fri från såväl kommersiell som politisk styrning och finns i hela landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is important that culture stands free from both commercial and political control and exists throughout the country.”
- good economic conditions»Kulturpolitiken behöver skapa goda ekonomiska villkor för såväl« (party programme ↗)“Cultural policy needs to create good economic conditions for both”
- stop depletion of culture»Även kulturen och idrotten har utarmats när skolbibliotek läggs ned, simskolan blivit dyrare och biografer finns på färre orter.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Even culture and sports have been impoverished when school libraries close, swimming lessons become more expensive, and cinemas exist in fewer places.”
- both institutions and free culture»institutioner som den fria kulturen, för såväl traditionella som nya« (party programme ↗)“institutions as free culture, for both traditional and new”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The party programme requires that institutions for professional cultural life exist across the country and that the various forms of art are made accessible to everyone across the country.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme requires that institutions for professional cultural life exist across the country and that the various forms of art are made accessible to everyone across the country. More funding for the collaboration model, permanent support and a mandate to strengthen visual and applied arts infrastructure is precisely that policy. The election manifesto also promises special cultural initiatives in resource-scarce areas.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet kräver att institutioner för det professionella kulturlivet finns över hela landet och att konstens uttrycksformer görs tillgängliga för alla i hela landet. Mer medel till samverkansmodellen, permanentade stöd och ett uppdrag att stärka bild- och formkonstens infrastruktur är precis den politiken. Valmanifestet lovar dessutom särskilda kultursatsningar i resurssvaga områden.
- cultural institutions across the countrydecisive»Institutioner för det professionella kulturlivet ska därför finnas över hela landet« (party programme ↗)“Institutions for professional cultural life shall therefore exist across the country”
- culture accessible to everyone»konstens olika uttrycksformer tillgängliga för alla, barn och vuxna, i hela landet« (party programme ↗)“various forms of art accessible to everyone, children and adults, across the country”
- targeted cultural initiatives»Vi vill stärka kulturskolan för att säkra alla barns möjligheter till kulturella aktiviteter, och genomföra särskilda satsningar i resurssvaga områden« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to strengthen cultural education to ensure all children's opportunities for cultural activities, and carry out special initiatives in resource-scarce areas”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The election manifesto wants to invest in a broad recovery plan for cultural life across the country that includes both public, free, professional and voluntary actors, and build a stronger cultural life that more have access to.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto wants to invest in a broad recovery plan for cultural life across the country that includes both public, free, professional and voluntary actors, and build a stronger cultural life that more have access to. The party programme invests in regional cultural activities and equitable access to culture. Making the recovery support permanent and allocating more funds to the collaboration model follows directly from this.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet vill satsa på en bred återhämtningsplan för kulturlivet i hela landet som omfattar både offentliga, fria, professionella och ideella aktörer, och bygga ett starkare kulturliv som fler har tillgång till. Partiprogrammet satsar på regional kulturverksamhet och jämlik tillgång till kultur. Att permanenta återhämtningsstöden och tillföra mer medel till samverkansmodellen följer direkt av detta.
- recovery plan for culturedecisive»satsa på en bred återhämtningsplan för kulturlivet i hela landet, som omfattar både offentliga, fria, professionella och ideella aktörer.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“invest in a broad recovery plan for cultural life across the country, which includes both public, free, professional and voluntary actors.”
- culture across the country»Vi vill bygga ett starkare kulturliv som fler har tillgång till — i hela landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to build a stronger cultural life that more have access to — across the country.”
- regional cultural activities»Därför satsar vi på regional kulturverksamhet som till exempel museer och folkbibliotek.« (party programme ↗)“Therefore we invest in regional cultural activities such as museums and public libraries.”
- equitable access to culture»utöva och ta del av kultur på jämlika villkor.« (party programme ↗)“engage in and access culture on equal terms.”
The plan makes culture across the country an important starting point and wants state cultural institutions to spread their activities across the country.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan makes culture across the country an important starting point and wants state cultural institutions to spread their activities across the country. More funding for the collaboration model and a mandate to strengthen infrastructure for visual art and design point in that direction. At the same time, the plan promises to be prudent with taxpayers' money and to keep arm's length distance, so support for increased and permanent appropriations is weakly underpinned.
Original (Swedish)
Planen gör kultur i hela landet till en viktig utgångspunkt och vill att statliga kulturinstitutioner sprider sin verksamhet över landet. Mer medel till samverkansmodellen och ett uppdrag att stärka infrastrukturen för bild och form ligger i den riktningen. Samtidigt lovar planen att hushålla med skattebetalarnas pengar och att hålla armlängds avstånd, så stödet för just ökade och permanentade anslag är svagt underbyggt.
- culture across the countrydecisive»Att tillhandahålla kultur i hela landet är en viktig utgångspunkt för Centerpartiet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Providing culture across the country is an important starting point for the Centre Party.”
- dispersed cultural activities»Statliga kulturinstitutioner ska sprida sin verksamhet i hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“State cultural institutions shall spread their activities across the country.”
- arm's length distance»Politiken ska bidra till goda förutsättningar men hålla armlängds avstånd.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Policy shall contribute to good conditions but keep arm's length distance.”
- prudence with tax funds»Politiken ska hushålla med skattebetalarnas pengar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Policy shall be prudent with taxpayers' money.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The party programme requires the public to at all levels promote the diversity of cultural expression and increase culture's accessibility to the entire population, and wants public funding to take forms that guarantee independence from political detailed control.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme requires the public to at all levels promote the diversity of cultural expression and increase culture's accessibility to the entire population, and wants public funding to take forms that guarantee independence from political detailed control. Permanent support and a strengthened infrastructure for visual and applied arts are in line with this. The plan simultaneously wants the state to exercise less control, which speaks against new detailed agency mandates.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet ålägger det offentliga att på alla nivåer gynna mångfalden av kulturuttryck och öka kulturens tillgänglighet för hela befolkningen, och vill att offentlig finansiering sker i former som garanterar oberoende från politisk detaljstyrning. Permanentade stöd och en stärkt infrastruktur för bild- och formkonst ligger i linje med detta. Planen vill samtidigt att staten styr mindre, vilket talar emot nya detaljerade myndighetsuppdrag.
- culture accessible throughout the countrydecisive»Det offentliga ska på alla nivåer gynna mångfalden av kulturuttryck, öka kulturens tillgänglighet« (party programme ↗)“The public shall at all levels promote the diversity of cultural expression, increase culture's accessibility”
- funding without detailed control»garanterar kulturlivets oberoende gentemot politisk detaljstyrning« (party programme ↗)“guarantees cultural life's independence from political detailed control”
- free cultural policy»Kulturpolitiken ska utgå från frihet, mångfald och kvalitet men ska inte lägga sig i innehållet i kulturen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Cultural policy shall be based on freedom, diversity and quality but shall not involve itself in the content of culture.”
- state-independent cultural institutions»Mångfalden i kulturlivet ska öka genom att fler kulturinstitutioner görs självständiga från staten.« (party programme ↗)“The diversity in cultural life shall increase by making more cultural institutions independent from the state.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan places on the state the responsibility to provide a cultural infrastructure across the country and establishes that the public not only shall guarantee cultural freedom but also actively contribute to culture reaching the citizens.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan places on the state the responsibility to provide a cultural infrastructure across the country and establishes that the public not only shall guarantee cultural freedom but also actively contribute to culture reaching the citizens. More resources to the cooperation model and a mandate to strengthen visual and form art infrastructure follows from this. The plan's goal that all Sweden shall live points in the same direction.
Original (Swedish)
Planen ålägger staten att ansvara för en kulturell infrastruktur i hela landet och slår fast att det offentliga inte bara ska garantera kulturell frihet utan också aktivt bidra till att kulturen kommer medborgarna till del. Mer medel till samverkansmodellen och ett uppdrag att stärka bild- och formkonstens infrastruktur följer av det. Planens mål att hela Sverige ska leva pekar åt samma håll.
- cultural infrastructure across the countrydecisive»svara för det som brukar benämnas en kulturell infrastruktur, i hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“be responsible for what is usually called a cultural infrastructure, across the country.”
- culture shall reach the citizens»ska inte bara garantera kulturell frihet, utan också aktivt bidra till att kulturen kommer medborgarna till« (party programme ↗)“shall not only guarantee cultural freedom, but also actively contribute to culture reaching the citizens”
- good conditions for the arts»Det offentliga har ansvar för att konstarterna får« (party programme ↗)“The public has responsibility for the arts receiving”
- all Sweden shall live»Målet är att hela Sverige ska leva och att varje kommun och region ska vara ett fungerande samhälle, där« (party programme ↗)“The goal is that all Sweden shall live and that every municipality and region shall be a functioning society, where”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan contains no commitments to the culture cooperation model or to permanent recovery support for culture.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan contains no commitments to the culture cooperation model or to permanent recovery support for culture. The decisive closest principle is that all new promises must be financed or fit within the surplus target and that the major needs within the legal system, defense, and welfare require hard prioritization. Increased and permanent culture appropriations therefore do not follow from the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen innehåller inga åtaganden om kultursamverkansmodellen eller om permanentade återhämtningsstöd till kulturen. Den avgörande närliggande principen är att alla nya löften ska finansieras eller rymmas inom överskottsmålet och att de stora behoven inom rättsväsende, försvar och välfärd kräver hårda prioriteringar. Ökade och permanentade kulturanslag följer därför inte av planen.
- financed reformsdecisive»Alla nya löften och reformer – som till exempel våra inkomstskattesänkningar – behöver finansieras eller rymmas inom överskottsmålet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“All new promises and reforms – such as our income tax cuts – need to be financed or fit within the surplus target.”
- core tasks first»De stora behoven inom rättsväsendet, försvaret och välfärden ställer stora krav på prioriteringar under åren som kommer.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The major needs within the legal system, defense, and welfare place major demands on prioritization in the years to come.”
- prioritization of the state's tasks»Politiken har en viktig uppgift att prioritera och välja bort« (party programme ↗)“Politics has an important task to prioritize and rule out”
The plan wants to reduce public economic control over contemporary culture and instead give citizens greater influence over how cultural funds are distributed, and redirect public spending to welfare and justice.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to reduce public economic control over contemporary culture and instead give citizens greater influence over how cultural funds are distributed, and redirect public spending to welfare and justice. Permanent support and increased appropriations within the cooperation model go in the opposite direction. That culture should reach all of Sweden however speaks partly in favour of the counter-proposal.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill minska det offentligas ekonomiska kontroll över samtidskulturen och i stället ge medborgarna större inflytande över hur kulturmedlen fördelas, samt rikta om offentliga utgifter till välfärden och rättsväsendet. Permanentade stöd och utökade anslag inom samverkansmodellen går i motsatt riktning. Att kulturen ska nå hela Sverige talar dock delvis för motförslaget.
- less public culture controldecisive»Minska det offentligas ekonomiska kontroll över samtidskulturen och mediesfären« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Reduce public economic control over contemporary culture and the media sphere”
- citizen influence over cultural funds»Fördela offentliga kulturmedel och utforma offentliga miljöer med ett större medborgarinflytande« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Distribute public cultural funds and design public environments with greater citizen influence”
- reprioritize to welfare»Se över offentliga utgifter och rikta om medel till välfärden och rättsväsendet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Review public expenditure and redirect funds to welfare and justice”
- culture throughout the country»Politiken bör utformas för att den svenska kulturen ska nå hela Sverige.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Policy should be designed so that Swedish culture reaches all of Sweden.”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2024/25:KrU6)
- Committee report full text (HC01KrU6)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2024/25:1321 — Politik för tornedalingar, kväner och lantalaiset av Jan Riise m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2024/25:1339 — Kultur och natur på recept av Anna-Lena Hedberg m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1347 — Arkitekturfrågor av Anna-Lena Hedberg m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1348 — Scenkonst av Anna-Lena Hedberg m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1415 — Åtgärder mot extremism i civilsamhället av Jonas Andersson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1418 — Åtgärder för att stärka kulturella och kreativa näringar av Alexander Christiansson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1509 — En barndom utan mobbning av Louise Thunström m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2024/25:152 — Offentliga satsningar på musik av Mirja Räihä och Per-Arne Håkansson (båda S)
- Motion 2024/25:1704 — Kulturskolans verksamhet under skoldagen av Azra Muranovic m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2024/25:1774 — Stärkt kulturpolitik - stärkt demokrati av Mats Berglund m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2024/25:1794 — En jämlik tillgång till kulturskola för alla barn av Linnéa Wickman m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2024/25:1902 — Utveckling av kultursamverkansmodellen för ökat kulturellt genomslag i hela landet av Anders Ådahl (C)
- Motion 2024/25:1922 — En funktionsrättspolitik för trygghet och delaktighet av Nadja Awad m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2024/25:2206 — Statens engagemang för alla barns tillgång till en likvärdig kulturskola av Linus Sköld och Ida Karkiainen (båda S)
- Motion 2024/25:2211 — Öka medvetenhet och utbildning kring barns rättigheter av Fredrik Lundh Sammeli (S)
- Motion 2024/25:2381 — Ensambegravningar av Jesper Skalberg Karlsson (M)
- Motion 2024/25:2510 — Kulturfastigheter behöver långsiktiga lösningar av Mattias Vepsä m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2024/25:2595 — Ökad undervisning i privatekonomi i grundskola och gymnasium av Ida Drougge (M)
- Motion 2024/25:2617 — Främjande av kulturella och kreativa branscher av Elin Söderberg m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2024/25:2635 — Näringspolitik för grön omställning och stärkt konkurrenskraft av Elin Söderberg m.fl. (MP)
Source: The Swedish Parliament