2023-06-142022/23:TU12 · p.3TUTransport & infrastructure

Digitalization in public activities

Digitalization of public administration

What's at stake: The decision affects how quickly and in what way government agencies are expected to share and make use of data and apply artificial intelligence, which in turn affects the efficiency of and service provided by public administration to citizens.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

Whether the goal for digitalizing public administration should be reformulated and paired with clearer requirements on open data and AI use, or whether the current direction and ongoing initiatives are sufficient.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee views positively the ongoing initiatives for digital infrastructure, open data and AI use within the administration, and considers that the new law on data availability and ongoing inquiries already address what is being called for; it therefore recommends rejecting the motions.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 4 (S)

The reservation (S) calls for reformulating the goal of public-administration digitalization around a simpler everyday life for citizens and a more open, innovative administration, and wants Digg to keep working to free up data and increase the use of AI.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 4 by S.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
VNoYes 21/0/0/3departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
Sown reservationNoNo 0/94/0/13follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
MPNoYes 15/0/0/3departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
CNoAbstain 0/0/21/3departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
LNoYes 14/0/0/2departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
KDNoYes 16/0/0/3departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
MNoYes 60/0/0/8departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
SDNoAbstain 0/0/63/9departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed

Committee proposal

The Riksdag rejects the motions 2022/23:78 by Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M), 2022/23:848 by Niels Paarup-Petersen et al. (C) motion 16, 2022/23:881 by Martina Johansson et al. (C) motion 8, 2022/23:934 by Tobias Andersson et al. (SD) motion 8, 2022/23:1121 by Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist et al. (C) motion 37, 2022/23:1494 by Bo Broman (SD), 2022/23:1643 by Niels Paarup-Petersen et al. (C) motions 2, 12, 13, 22 and 42, and 2022/23:2140 by Gunilla Svantorp et al. (S) motions 47 and 52.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2022/23:78 av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M), 2022/23:848 av Niels Paarup-Petersen m.fl. (C) yrkande 16, 2022/23:881 av Martina Johansson m.fl. (C) yrkande 8, 2022/23:934 av Tobias Andersson m.fl. (SD) yrkande 8, 2022/23:1121 av Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist m.fl. (C) yrkande 37, 2022/23:1494 av Bo Broman (SD), 2022/23:1643 av Niels Paarup-Petersen m.fl. (C) yrkandena 2, 12, 13, 22 och 42 samt 2022/23:2140 av Gunilla Svantorp m.fl. (S) yrkandena 47 och 52.

Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected the 89 proposals in motions submitted during the general motion period of 2022. The proposals dealt with, among other things, digitalization, digital participation and authentication, access to electronic communication, expansion of the 5G network, and postal service throughout the country. The Riksdag refers to planned or already taken measures and ongoing preparation work.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan does not address digitization targets, open data or AI in administration.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan does not address digitization targets, open data or AI in administration. The nearest principle is that public activity shall be democratized and hierarchies and detailed control replaced by trust, and that the principle of public access is a building block of democracy, which speaks for simpler and more open administration. The plan also warns that new systems should not replace resources in the activity.

Original (Swedish)

Planen behandlar inte digitaliseringsmål, öppna data eller AI i förvaltningen. Närmast liggande princip är att den offentliga verksamheten ska demokratiseras och att hierarkier och detaljstyrning ska ersättas med tillit, samt att offentlighetsprincipen är en byggsten i demokratin, vilket talar för en enklare och öppnare förvaltning. Planen varnar samtidigt för att nya system inte ersätter resurser i verksamheten.

  • democratize administrationdecisive»En demokratisering av den offentliga verksamheten« (party programme ↗)“A democratization of public activity”
  • principle of public access»föreningsfriheten, yttrande- och tryckfriheten, offentlighetsprincipen« (party programme ↗)“freedom of association, freedom of expression and press freedom, principle of public access”
  • resources before systems»Det är resurser som främst behövs, inte formulär för kvalitetssäkring, nya bokningssystem för sjukhussängar eller ännu en managementkonsult som inte kan något om verksamheten.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is resources that are primarily needed, not forms for quality assurance, new booking systems for hospital beds, or yet another management consultant who knows nothing about the activity.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

SSocialdemokraternaNoNofollows the plannot addressed

The plan wants to invest in digitalization and establishes that money shall go to activities and employees rather than more bureaucracy, which aligns with the goal of an easier everyday life for citizens.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants to invest in digitalization and establishes that money shall go to activities and employees rather than more bureaucracy, which aligns with the goal of an easier everyday life for citizens. The party programme requires that administration is based on transparency and openness, which speaks for releasing data. The counter-proposal's requirement for reformulated goals and continued work with data and AI is therefore supported in substance.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill satsa på digitalisering och slår fast att pengar ska gå till verksamhet och medarbetare snarare än mer byråkrati, vilket ligger nära målet om en enklare vardag för medborgarna. Partiprogrammet kräver att förvaltningen bygger på offentlighet och insyn, vilket talar för att frigöra data. Motförslagets krav på omformulerat mål och fortsatt arbete med data och AI stöds därför i sak.

  • investment in digitalizationdecisive»Vi vill satsa på grön teknik, digitalisering och utbildning så att företagsklimatet stärks och kompetensförsörjningen förbättras.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to invest in green technology, digitalization and education so that the business climate is strengthened and skills supply is improved.”
  • transparency and openness»Den demokratiska processen och samhällsförvaltningen måste bygga på offentlighet och« (party programme ↗)“The democratic process and administration of society must be based on transparency and”
  • less bureaucracy»Villkor ska ställas så att pengarna till välfärden verkligen går till dess medarbetare – inte mer byråkrati.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Conditions shall be set so that money for welfare really goes to its employees - not more bureaucracy.”
MPMiljöpartietNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan views open source and open hardware positively and requires that the principle of public access be valued and information be readily accessible to citizens, which speaks for the counter-proposal's goal of a more open public administration and released data.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan views open source and open hardware positively and requires that the principle of public access be valued and information be readily accessible to citizens, which speaks for the counter-proposal's goal of a more open public administration and released data. Digital solutions are also welcomed as a tool in urban planning. The plan says nothing about increased use of AI in the public administration, and at the same time it requires that privacy be protected, so the support rests on derived principles.

Original (Swedish)

Planen ser positivt på öppen källkod och öppen hårdvara och kräver att offentlighetsprincipen värnas samt att information är lättillgänglig för medborgarna, vilket talar för motförslagets mål om en öppnare förvaltning och frigjord data. Digitala lösningar bejakas också som verktyg i samhällsplaneringen. Planen säger däremot ingenting om ökad AI-användning i förvaltningen, och den kräver samtidigt att integriteten värnas, varför stödet vilar på härledda principer.

  • open source and open datadecisive»källkod och öppen hårdvara som ett sätt att« (party programme ↗)“source code and open hardware as a way to”
  • public access and transparency»Offentlighetsprincipen och meddelarfriheten måste« (party programme ↗)“The principle of public access and freedom of information must”
  • readily accessible information»En deltagande demokrati kräver lättillgänglig« (party programme ↗)“A participatory democracy requires readily accessible”
  • transparency in recorded information»lätt att få reda på vilken information myndigheter« (party programme ↗)“easy to find out what information authorities”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

CCenterpartietNoAbstaindeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan sees digitalisation on equal terms as a prerequisite for democracy and decentralisation, wants to make Sweden more transparent, and wants to reduce administration with digital tools genuinely demanded by staff.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan sees digitalisation on equal terms as a prerequisite for democracy and decentralisation, wants to make Sweden more transparent, and wants to reduce administration with digital tools genuinely demanded by staff. A goal of a simpler everyday life for citizens and a more open government making data available aligns with this. The plan does not particularly address AI use.

Original (Swedish)

Planen ser digitalisering på lika villkor som en förutsättning för demokrati och decentralisering, vill göra Sverige mer transparent och vill minska administrationen med digitala verktyg som verkligen efterfrågas av medarbetarna. Ett mål om enklare vardag för medborgarna och en öppnare förvaltning som frigör data ligger i linje med detta. Planen behandlar inte AI-användning särskilt.

  • digitalisation on equal termsdecisive»Digitalisering på lika villkor, oavsett var man bor, är en förutsättning för demokrati och möjliggör decentralisering.« (party programme ↗)“Digitalisation on equal terms, regardless of where you live, is a prerequisite for democracy and enables decentralisation.”
  • more open government»Sverige ska bli ännu mer transparent. Vi vill inrätta en antikorruptionsmyndighet, skärpa regler mot korruption och införa ett lobbyregister.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden shall become even more transparent. We want to establish an anti-corruption agency, tighten rules against corruption, and introduce a lobbying register.”
  • digital tools reduce administration»Den administrativa bördan inom vården måste minska, bland annat med hjälp av digitala verktyg som är användbara och efterfrågade av medarbetarna.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The administrative burden in healthcare must be reduced, among other things with the help of digital tools that are usable and demanded by staff.”
  • transparency as basic principle»Öppenhet och transparens är grundförutsättningar för frihet, demokrati och för att förhindra korruption och övergrepp.« (party programme ↗)“Openness and transparency are basic prerequisites for freedom, democracy, and for preventing corruption and abuses.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

LLiberalernaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The party programme makes it a central principle that all public functions that can reasonably be made digitally accessible shall also be made so, and wants general records to be made accessible on the internet to the greater extent to facilitate insight.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The party programme makes it a central principle that all public functions that can reasonably be made digitally accessible shall also be made so, and wants general records to be made accessible on the internet to the greater extent to facilitate insight. A goal formulated as simpler everyday life for citizens and a more open administration that releases data lies directly in that line. The plan says nothing about AI or about the digitalization agency's assignment, so the conclusion is derived.

Original (Swedish)

Partiprogrammet gör det till en central princip att alla offentliga funktioner som till rimlig kostnad kan göras digitalt tillgängliga också ska göras det, och vill att allmänna handlingar i högre grad görs tillgängliga på nätet för att underlätta insyn. Ett mål formulerat som enklare vardag för medborgarna och en öppnare förvaltning som frigör data ligger direkt i den linjen. Planen säger inget om AI eller om digitaliseringsmyndighetens uppdrag, varför slutsatsen är härledd.

  • digital first in administrationdecisive»kan göras digitalt tillgängliga också ska göras digitalt tillgängliga.« (party programme ↗)“can be made digitally accessible shall also be made digitally accessible.”
  • open data and insight»Diarier och allmänna handlingar bör i större utsträckning göras« (party programme ↗)“Diaries and general records should to a greater extent be made”
  • embrace digitalization»Digitaliseringen innebär fantastiska möjligheter för den enskilda individen och för samhället i stort« (party programme ↗)“Digitalization means fantastic opportunities for the individual and for society as a whole”
  • open administration»Offentlighetsprincipen har en grundläggande betydelse för att förankra och fördjupa folkstyret« (party programme ↗)“The principle of public access has fundamental importance for anchoring and deepening popular government”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

KDKristdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan makes the principle of public access central to an open democracy and establishes that new technology that enables decentralization shall be utilized.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan makes the principle of public access central to an open democracy and establishes that new technology that enables decentralization shall be utilized. A goal of simpler everyday life, more open administration, freed-up data and increased AI use aligns with this. The plan simultaneously requires great caution and respect for personal privacy in the handling of personal data.

Original (Swedish)

Planen gör offentlighetsprincipen central för en öppen demokrati och slår fast att ny teknik som möjliggör decentralisering ska tas tillvara. Ett mål om enklare vardag, öppnare förvaltning, frigjorda data och ökad AI-användning ligger i linje med detta. Planen kräver samtidigt stor försiktighet och respekt för den personliga integriteten vid hantering av personuppgifter.

  • openness and the principle of public accessdecisive»Offentlighetsprincipen, det vill säga tillgången till« (party programme ↗)“The principle of public access, that is access to”
  • utilize new technology»Ny teknik som skapar stora möjligheter till decentralisering av produktion och beslutsfattande« (party programme ↗)“New technology that creates great opportunities for decentralization of production and decision-making”
  • protection for privacy»försiktighet och respekt för den personliga integriteten« (party programme ↗)“caution and respect for personal privacy”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MModeraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan wants to shorten the time government agencies take to process cases, remove regulatory red tape so it becomes easy to do the right thing, and deepen the internal market for digital services.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants to shorten the time government agencies take to process cases, remove regulatory red tape so it becomes easy to do the right thing, and deepen the internal market for digital services. A goal for public digitalization that puts easier everyday life for citizens and more innovative administration at the center, with more open data and increased AI use, is in line with this. However, the plan does not address the goal formulation as such, which is why the conclusion is derived.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill korta myndigheternas handläggningstider, ta bort regelkrångel så att det blir lätt att göra rätt och fördjupa den inre marknaden för digitala tjänster. Ett mål för den offentliga digitaliseringen som sätter en enklare vardag för medborgarna och en mer innovativ förvaltning i centrum, med mer öppna data och ökad AI-användning, ligger i linje med detta. Planen behandlar dock inte målformuleringen som sådan, varför slutsatsen är härledd.

  • shorter processing timesdecisive»Korta myndigheternas handläggningstider genom en bortre tidsgräns« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Shorten the time government agencies take to process cases by setting an outer deadline”
  • easier for citizens»Där det är lätt att göra rätt – för att en tredjedel av regelkrånglet tagits bort.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Where it is easy to do the right thing – because a third of the regulatory red tape has been removed.”
  • digital development»Fördjupa den inre marknaden, inte minst för tjänster och digitala produkter« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Deepen the internal market, not least for services and digital products”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

SDSverigedemokraternaNoAbstaindeparts from the plannot addressed

The party programme establishes that a minimum of bureaucracy shall permeate all public activity, and the election manifesto requires clear public benefit for all government initiatives and streamlined public agencies.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The party programme establishes that a minimum of bureaucracy shall permeate all public activity, and the election manifesto requires clear public benefit for all government initiatives and streamlined public agencies. The plan also embraces digital government services, such as digital government mail. Formulating the goal for the administration's digitalization as a simpler everyday life for citizens and continuing to release data thereby aligns with the plan's commitments.

Original (Swedish)

Principprogrammet slår fast att ett minimum av byråkrati ska genomsyra all offentlig verksamhet, och valmanifestet kräver tydlig medborgarnytta för alla offentliga satsningar samt renodlade myndigheter. Planen bejakar också digitala myndighetstjänster, som digital myndighetspost. Att formulera målet för förvaltningens digitalisering som en enklare vardag för medborgarna och fortsätta frigöra data ligger därmed i linje med planens åtaganden.

  • minimum bureaucracydecisive»Centralt för partiet är att respekt för skattebetalarnas pengar och strävan efter ett minimum av byråkrati« (party programme ↗)“Central to the party is respect for taxpayers' money and the pursuit of a minimum of bureaucracy”
  • public benefit in initiatives»Sverigedemokraterna vill koncentrera de offentliga utgifterna till välfärdens hjärta och begära tydlig medborgarnytta för alla satsningar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden Democrats want to concentrate government spending on the heart of welfare and demand clear public benefit for all initiatives.”
  • digital government mail»säkerställa att alla har tillgång till telefoni och fungerande posttjänster, inklusive möjligheten att få sin myndighetspost digitalt« (2022 manifesto ↗)“ensure that everyone has access to telephony and functioning postal services, including the possibility of receiving government mail digitally”
  • streamlined public agencies»Stoppa slöseriet inom myndigheterna och slå samman myndigheter« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Stop waste within government agencies and merge agencies”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament