2023-06-072022/23:MJU16 · p.21MJUEnvironment & agriculture
Klimatklivet and Industriklivet
The Climate Leap and Industry Leap investment support
What's at stake: The decision affects how support for local climate measures and the transformation of heavy process industry is designed, and thereby how easy or costly it becomes for municipalities, companies and ordinary households to take part in the climate transition.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the Climate Leap and Industry Leap investment support schemes should continue in their current form, focused on the largest emission reduction per invested krona, or whether they should instead be developed with a clearer focus on making the climate transition more accessible to households and further strengthening support for heavy industry.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee welcomes the fact that the Climate Leap has been strengthened and extended and that support primarily goes to measures that give the greatest lasting emission reduction per invested krona, and that the Industry Leap supports the transformation of industry. The committee sees no reason to take further action beyond the investments and work already under way, such as the Swedish Energy Agency's task of investigating policy instruments for CCU, and therefore rejects the motions.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 35 (S)
The reservation (S) wants the Climate Leap, introduced in 2015, to keep developing with a clearer focus on making the climate transition easier for ordinary people, since it has been costly and difficult for many to take part. The Industry Leap, introduced in 2018 to transform heavy process industry, should continue and develop, and the government should keep strengthening the ongoing work in sectors such as chemicals, electricity and district heating, and transport-sector biofuel production.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 35 by S.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have gone the other way
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: MModeraterna, VVänsterpartiet
Ja 175–94Nej 94–175
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Yes 21/0/0/3 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| S | No | No 0/94/0/13 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
| MP | No | Abstain 0/0/15/3 | differs | confidence: high | explicit |
| C | No | Abstain 0/0/21/3 | differs | confidence: high | explicit |
| L | Yes | Yes 14/0/0/2 | match | confidence: medium | derived |
| KD | No | Yes 16/0/0/3 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| M | No | Yes 60/0/0/8 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: medium | explicit |
| SD | Yes | Yes 63/0/0/9 | match | confidence: medium | derived |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2022/23:834 by Ulrika Heie et al. (C) request 38, 2022/23:853 by Ulrika Heie et al. (C) request 29, 2022/23:2062 by Fredrik Olovsson et al. (S) request 6, 2022/23:2073 by Anna-Caren Sätherberg et al. (S) requests 9, 10 and 18, 2022/23:2175 by Per Bolund et al. (MP) requests 25 and 62, and 2022/23:2190 by Annie Lööf et al. (C) request 64.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2022/23:834 av Ulrika Heie m.fl. (C) yrkande 38, 2022/23:853 av Ulrika Heie m.fl. (C) yrkande 29, 2022/23:2062 av Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S) yrkande 6, 2022/23:2073 av Anna-Caren Sätherberg m.fl. (S) yrkandena 9, 10 och 18, 2022/23:2175 av Per Bolund m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 25 och 62 samt 2022/23:2190 av Annie Lööf m.fl. (C) yrkande 64.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected approximately 120 motions concerning climate issues received during the general motion period 2022. The proposals dealt, among other things, with international climate work, climate work within the EU, overarching Swedish climate policy, negative emissions and complementary measures, national climate investments, the transport sector's climate transition, and climate adaptation. The Riksdag refers, among other things, to ongoing work in the areas covered by the motions.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to modernize Sweden to become a fossil-free welfare state. (S) — Reservation 35
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The election manifesto establishes that it is policy's, not the individual's, responsibility to create opportunities for people to choose simple and cheap climate-smart alternatives, which is exactly the counter-proposal's direction of making the transition accessible for ordinary people.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto establishes that it is policy's, not the individual's, responsibility to create opportunities for people to choose simple and cheap climate-smart alternatives, which is exactly the counter-proposal's direction of making the transition accessible for ordinary people. The plan also proposes a massive investment programme where industry transitions from fossil to renewable with major state investments. Continued and developed support to process industry and to biofuels follows from that.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet slår fast att det är politikens, inte individens, ansvar att skapa möjligheter för människor att välja enkla och billiga klimatsmarta alternativ, vilket är exakt motförslagets inriktning på att göra omställningen tillgänglig för vanligt folk. Planen föreslår dessutom ett massivt investeringsprogram där industrin ställer om från fossilt till förnybart med stora statliga investeringar. Fortsatt och utvecklat stöd till processindustrin och till biodrivmedel följer av det.
- transition accessible for alldecisive»Det är politikens, och inte individens, ansvar att skapa möjligheter för människor att välja enkla och billiga klimatsmarta alternativ.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is policy's, and not the individual's, responsibility to create opportunities for people to choose simple and cheap climate-smart alternatives.”
- massive investment programme»Vänsterpartiet föreslår ett massivt investeringsprogram för den gröna industrin.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Left Party proposes a massive investment programme for the green industry.”
- state support for industrial transition»Industrier ska ställa om från fossilt till förnybart med hjälp av stora statliga investeringar« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Industries should transition from fossil to renewable with the help of major state investments”
- demands on industry»Politiken kan och måste ställa krav på att industrin ställer om« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Policy can and must set demands on industry to transition”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan commits to increasing green government investments and to, through government investments, accelerating the pace of industry's transformation and facilitating a climate-smart life.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan commits to increasing green government investments and to, through government investments, accelerating the pace of industry's transformation and facilitating a climate-smart life. The counter-proposal's requirement for continued developed investment support for local climate measures and for heavy processing industry is the same commitment, and the requirement that the transformation shall become accessible to ordinary people is the plan's own formulation. Support for biofuels for the transport sector also lies in the plan. The plan supports the requirement.
Original (Swedish)
Planen åtar sig att öka de gröna statliga investeringarna och att genom statliga investeringar öka takten i industrins omställning och underlätta ett klimatsmart liv. Motförslagets krav på fortsatt utvecklat investeringsstöd till lokala klimatåtgärder och till den tunga processindustrin är samma åtagande, och kravet på att omställningen ska bli tillgänglig för vanligt folk är planens egen formulering. Även stödet till biodrivmedel för transportsektorn ligger i planen. Planen stöder kravet.
- government investments in the transformationdecisive»Genom statliga investeringar kan vi öka takten i industrins omställning och underlätta ett klimatsmart liv.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Through government investments we can accelerate the pace of industry's transformation and facilitate a climate-smart life.”
- increase green investments»Öka de gröna statliga investeringarna.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Increase green government investments.”
- climate policy for ordinary people»Sverige och världen måste ställa om – och Sverige ska ha en klimatpolitik som fungerar för vanligt folk.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden and the world must transform – and Sweden shall have a climate policy that works for ordinary people.”
- more renewable fuels»Vi vill öka den svenska produktionen av förnybara drivmedel, så att det blir lättare att tanka fossilfritt i Sverige.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to increase Swedish production of renewable fuels, so that it becomes easier to fuel fossil-free in Sweden.”
The election manifesto wants to invest at least 100 billion per year in the transition and establishes that those with the fewest resources shall receive more support in the transition, which is the counter-proposal's requirement to make the climate transition accessible to ordinary people.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto wants to invest at least 100 billion per year in the transition and establishes that those with the fewest resources shall receive more support in the transition, which is the counter-proposal's requirement to make the climate transition accessible to ordinary people. The plan also wants strong support for energy efficiency improvements to both households and industries, which corresponds to continued support for process industry's transition.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet vill investera minst 100 miljarder per år i omställningen och slår fast att de med minst resurser ska få mer stöd i omställningen, vilket är motförslagets krav på att göra klimatomställningen tillgänglig för vanligt folk. Planen vill också ha ett kraftfullt stöd för energieffektivisering till både hushåll och industrier, vilket motsvarar fortsatt stöd till processindustrins omställning.
- transition accessible to alldecisive»De med minst resurser ska få mer samhällsservice, lägre skatt och mer stöd i omställningen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Those with the fewest resources shall receive more public services, lower taxes and more support in the transition.”
- large transition investments»investera minst 100 miljarder per år i att ställa om så att Sverige blir ett fossilfritt välfärdsland senast år 2030.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“invest at least 100 billion per year to transition so that Sweden becomes a fossil-free welfare state by 2030 at the latest.”
- support for industry's transition»införa ett kraftfullt stöd för energieffektivisering till både hushåll och industrier.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“introduce strong support for energy efficiency improvements to both households and industries.”
- strong economic instruments»Kraftfulla ekonomiska styrmedel är nödvändiga.« (party programme ↗)“Strong economic instruments are necessary.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The election manifesto requires that it be easy to do the right thing in everyday life and wants to broaden and scale up the green tax credit so that ordinary households can participate in the transition, which is the core of the counter-proposal.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto requires that it be easy to do the right thing in everyday life and wants to broaden and scale up the green tax credit so that ordinary households can participate in the transition, which is the core of the counter-proposal. The plan also highlights the green industrial boom and wants to multiply the production of biofuels, which corresponds to the demand for continued support to the process industry and to biofuels for the transport sector.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet kräver att det ska vara lätt att göra rätt i vardagen och vill bredda och skala upp det gröna avdraget så att vanliga hushåll kan delta i omställningen, vilket är motförslagets kärna. Planen lyfter också fram den gröna industriboomen och vill mångdubbla produktionen av biobränslen, vilket motsvarar kravet på fortsatt stöd till processindustrin och till biodrivmedel för transportsektorn.
- broad green tax creditdecisive»Det kan vi lösa genom att bredda och skala upp det gröna avdraget« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We can solve this by broadening and scaling up the green tax credit”
- easy to do the right thing»Det ska vara lätt att göra rätt i vardagen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It should be easy to do the right thing in everyday life.”
- support for green industry»En grön industriboom har redan påbörjats i Sverige, från batteriproduktion, bioraffinaderier och världens första fossilfria stål i norr till eldrivna bilar, flygplan och lastbilar längre söderut.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“A green industrial boom has already begun in Sweden, from battery production, biorefineries, and the world's first fossil-free steel in the north to electric cars, aircraft, and lorries further south.”
- more biofuel and biogas»Sveriges energioberoende måste stärkas, bland annat genom att mångdubbla produktionen av biobränslen och biogas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden's energy independence must be strengthened, among other things by multiplying biofuel and biogas production.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan wants to replace a climate policy that distributes subsidies with new technology, international cooperation and effective policy instruments, and distances itself from making climate policy a competition for the highest subsidies.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to replace a climate policy that distributes subsidies with new technology, international cooperation and effective policy instruments, and distances itself from making climate policy a competition for the highest subsidies. Further developing investment support for local climate measures to make the transition more accessible to ordinary people goes against that line. Support for the process industry's transition, however, has support in the plan's demand that carbon capture shall be promoted.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill ersätta en klimatpolitik som delar ut bidrag med ny teknik, internationellt samarbete och effektiva styrmedel, och tar avstånd från att göra klimatpolitiken till en tävling i högst bidrag. Att vidareutveckla investeringsstödet till lokala klimatåtgärder för att göra omställningen mer tillgänglig för vanligt folk går emot den linjen. Stödet till processindustrins omställning har däremot stöd i planens krav på att koldioxidinfångning ska främjas.
- technology and policy instruments before subsidiesdecisive»En klimatpolitik som ersätter den symbolpolitik där bidrag betalas ut till klimatångest i stället för det vi vet är allra viktigast: mer ny teknik, mer internationellt samarbete och fler effektiva styrmedel.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“A climate policy that replaces the symbolic politics where subsidies are paid out to climate anxiety instead of what we know is most important: more new technology, more international cooperation and more effective policy instruments.”
- climate taxes before subsidies»Därför är vi för riktiga klimatskatter i stället för att göra klimatpolitiken till en tävling i högst bidrag och flest symbolskatter.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Therefore, we are for real climate taxes instead of making climate policy a competition for the highest subsidies and most symbolic taxes.”
- promoted industry transition»Koldioxidinfångning vid utsläppstunga industrier ska främjas.« (party programme ↗)“Carbon capture at emission-intensive industries shall be promoted.”
- scaled-up CCS»Därför ska vi skala upp arbetet med infångning, avskiljning och lagring av koldioxid.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Therefore, we shall scale up work on carbon capture, separation and storage.”
The plan requires that economic instruments and support be used to create economic incentives to act environmentally friendly for both consumers and producers, and that domestic production of renewable fuels be stimulated.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that economic instruments and support be used to create economic incentives to act environmentally friendly for both consumers and producers, and that domestic production of renewable fuels be stimulated. Emission reductions are a prioritised area. Developing investment support so that the transition becomes accessible also for ordinary people and continuing support to process industry's transition aligns with the plan's direction, even though the plan principally rejects direct company subsidies.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att ekonomiska styrmedel och stöd används för att skapa ekonomiska motiv att agera miljövänligt hos både konsumenter och producenter, och att inhemsk produktion av förnybara bränslen stimuleras. Utsläppsminskningar är ett prioriterat område. Att utveckla investeringsstödet så att omställningen blir tillgänglig även för vanligt folk och att fortsätta stödet till processindustrins omställning ligger i planens riktning, även om planen principiellt avvisar direkta företagssubventioner.
- economic incentives for environmental benefitdecisive»Ekonomiska styrmedel och stöd ska användas för« (party programme ↗)“Economic instruments and support shall be used for”
- reduced emissions»MINSKADE KLIMATUTSLÄPP« (2022 manifesto ↗)“REDUCED CLIMATE EMISSIONS”
- stimulated domestic production»Inhemsk produktion ska stimuleras.« (party programme ↗)“Domestic production shall be stimulated.”
- no direct subsidies»Direkta företagssubventioner avvisas.« (party programme ↗)“Direct company subsidies are rejected.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan promises to continue investing in Industriklivet, which helps industry transition, to establish large-scale carbon dioxide capture and to invest in the production of biofuels, which covers the counter-proposal's requirement for continued and developed support for process industry transition.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan promises to continue investing in Industriklivet, which helps industry transition, to establish large-scale carbon dioxide capture and to invest in the production of biofuels, which covers the counter-proposal's requirement for continued and developed support for process industry transition. Making the transition cheaper and more accessible to ordinary people is matched by strengthening and expanding the green tax deduction. The plan therefore supports the demand.
Original (Swedish)
Planen lovar att fortsätta satsa på Industriklivet som hjälper industrin att ställa om, att få på plats storskalig koldioxidinfångning och att satsa på tillverkning av biodrivmedel, vilket täcker motförslagets krav på fortsatt och utvecklat stöd till processindustrins omställning. Att göra omställningen billigare och mer tillgänglig för vanligt folk motsvaras av att det gröna skatteavdraget ska förstärkas och utvidgas. Planen stöder därför kravet.
- continued Industriklivetdecisive»Fortsätta satsa på Industriklivet som hjälper industrin att ställa om« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Continue to invest in Industriklivet, which helps industry transition”
- transition accessible for households»Göra det billigare för privatpersoner att minska sin elkonsumtion genom att förstärka och utvidga det gröna skatteavdraget« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Make it cheaper for private individuals to reduce their electricity consumption by strengthening and expanding the green tax deduction”
- carbon dioxide capture»Få på plats storskalig infångning av koldioxid« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Establish large-scale carbon dioxide capture”
- biofuels for transport»Satsa på tillverkning av biodrivmedel« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Invest in the production of biofuels”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The counter-proposal wishes to develop and broaden investment support for local climate measures so that more private individuals can benefit from it.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal wishes to develop and broaden investment support for local climate measures so that more private individuals can benefit from it. The election manifesto instead wishes to reduce the costs of climate measures that can be done more efficiently and explicitly criticizes subsidies for e-bikes and similar lacking evidence-based results; funds shall go to measures that reduce emissions most per spending. That the plan supports industry transformation and Swedish biofuel production is not enough to carry a broadened grant support for household-level measures.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslaget vill utveckla och bredda investeringsstödet för lokala klimatåtgärder så att fler privatpersoner kan ta del av det. Valmanifestet vill tvärtom minska kostnaderna för klimatåtgärder som kan göras mer effektivt och kritiserar uttryckligen subventioner av elcyklar och liknande som saknar evidensbaserade resultat; medel ska gå till åtgärder som minskar utsläppen mest per satsad krona. Att planen stödjer industrins omställning och svensk biobränsleproduktion räcker inte för att bära ett breddat bidragsstöd till hushållsnära åtgärder.
- criticism of grant subsidiesdecisive»Subventioner av anställningar, elcyklar och lyxbilar sker precis som mångmiljardsatsningar i integrationsprojekt helt utan evidensbaserade resultat.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Subsidies for employment, e-bikes and luxury cars occur, just as multi-billion initiatives in integration projects, entirely without evidence-based results.”
- cheaper climate measures»Minska kostnaderna för migrationspolitik, bistånd, EU-bidrag och klimatåtgärder som kan göras mer effektiva« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Reduce the costs of migration policy, aid, EU grants and climate measures that can be done more efficiently”
- most emissions per krona»Satsa på åtgärder som minskar utsläppen mest per satsad krona som t ex internationella klimatinvesteringar« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Invest in measures that reduce emissions most per spent krona, such as international climate investments”
- industry transformation prioritized»Prioritera svensk industri och konkurrenskraft« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Prioritize Swedish industry and competitiveness”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2022/23:MJU16)
- Committee report full text (HA01MJU16)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2022/23:1246 — Hållbart skogsbruk för biologisk mångfald och klimatet av Kajsa Fredholm m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2022/23:1318 — Sveriges klimatpolitik av Aylin Fazelian (S)
- Motion 2022/23:148 — Acceleration av klimatomställningen av Lawen Redar (S)
- Motion 2022/23:151 — Hållbart grönt guld av Hanna Westerén (S)
- Motion 2022/23:155 — Jämlik klimatpolitik av Hanna Westerén (S)
- Motion 2022/23:1673 — Jämställdhet för hållbar utveckling av Annie Lööf m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2022/23:1879 — En fokuserad utvecklingsagenda bortom 2030 av Kerstin Lundgren m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2022/23:2029 — Klimatomställning av Anna Vikström m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2022/23:2062 — En politik för ekonomisk resiliens och stärkt konkurrenskraft av Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2022/23:2073 — Utgiftsområde 20 Allmän miljö- och naturvård av Anna-Caren Sätherberg m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2022/23:2110 — En kraftfull naturpolitik för starka ekosystem, biologisk mångfald och ökad klimatnytta av Per Bolund m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2022/23:2140 — Utgiftsområde 22 Kommunikationer av Gunilla Svantorp m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2022/23:2170 — För en stark grön näringslivsutveckling av Elin Söderberg m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2022/23:2175 — En klimatpolitik som står upp för Parisavtalet av Per Bolund m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2022/23:2190 — Ledarskap för klimat och grön omställning av Annie Lööf m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2022/23:2262 — Stärk det civila försvaret och krisberedskapen av Emma Berginger m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2022/23:36 — Åtgärder för att ge Sverige EU:s billigaste och miljövänligaste energi av Per Bolund m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2022/23:834 — Hållbara transporter med hög tillgänglighet i hela landet av Ulrika Heie m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2022/23:849 — Internationellt samarbete i en ny tid av Kerstin Lundgren m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2022/23:853 — Grön omställning av transportsektorn av Ulrika Heie m.fl. (C)
Source: The Swedish Parliament