2026-03-182025/26:FöU10 · p.16FöUDefence

Wind Power

Coordinating wind-power expansion with national-defence interests

What's at stake: Wind power can be built out relatively quickly and meet rising electricity demand in the short term, but the facilities affect national defence as well as the habitats of people and animals and the landscape, making the trade-off between rapid expansion and defence needs central to the energy transition.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is whether the Armed Forces should be directed to actively cooperate with the energy sector to find locations and technical solutions that allow wind power to be expanded without disturbing defence interests, or whether the government's general work to create good conditions for all fossil-free energy sources is enough without a targeted statement on wind power specifically.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee notes that the government is working to create good conditions for all fossil-free energy sources, not just wind power, with faster and legally sound permitting processes and measures for local acceptance, and therefore sees no reason to direct a statement specifically at coordinating wind power with national defence.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 38 (MP)

The reservation (MP) argues that the Armed Forces must cooperate with actors in the energy sector to find suitable locations and technical solutions so that wind-power expansion does not disturb defence interests, and calls for a statement directing the Armed Forces to actively work to enable or facilitate the expansion.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 38 by MP.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
VNoAbstain 1/0/14/7departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived
SNoYes 92/0/1/13departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived
MPown reservationNoNo 0/16/0/2follows the planconfidence: highderived
CNoAbstain 0/0/21/3departs from the planconfidence: highderived
LNoYes 10/0/0/6departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived
KDYesYes 17/0/0/2follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
MYesYes 60/0/0/8follows the planconfidence: lowderived
SDYesYes 62/0/0/9follows the planconfidence: mediumderived

Broke with the party line

VKarin Rågsjö (V, Stockholms kommun)Yes — party line: Abstain
SMarkus Selin (S, Stockholms län)Abstain — party line: Yes

MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.

Committee proposal

The Riksdag rejects the motions 2025/26:639 by Heléne Björklund (S), 2025/26:2797 by Nooshi Dadgostar et al. (V) demand 9, 2025/26:2822 by Mikael Larsson et al. (C) demand 10 and 2025/26:3405 by Emma Berginger et al. (MP) demand 39.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2025/26:639 av Heléne Björklund (S), 2025/26:2797 av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V) yrkande 9, 2025/26:2822 av Mikael Larsson m.fl. (C) yrkande 10 och 2025/26:3405 av Emma Berginger m.fl. (MP) yrkande 39.

Riksdag decision: The Riksdag said no to 160 proposals on total defence. The proposals were submitted during the general motion period of 2025 and concern, among other things, the Defence Force's operational capability and war organization, training activities and Sweden's support to Ukraine. The Riksdag refers primarily to the considerations made in the decision on total defence for the period 2025–2030 remaining in place and to the ongoing work in many of the various areas that the proposers raised.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoAbstaindeparts from the planderived

The plan requires radical expansion of renewable electricity production and for the state to invest in renewable energy.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan requires radical expansion of renewable electricity production and for the state to invest in renewable energy. That defence interests should not block wind power expansion but be handled through cooperation on location and technical solutions follows from that prioritization. The plan simultaneously assumes that the expansion benefits the municipality and residents of the surrounding area.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver en radikal utbyggnad av den förnybara elproduktionen och att staten går in med satsningar på förnybar energi. Att försvarets intressen inte ska blockera vindkraftsutbyggnaden utan hanteras genom samarbete om lokalisering och tekniska lösningar följer av den prioriteringen. Planen förutsätter samtidigt att utbyggnaden gynnar kommun och boende i närområdet.

  • radical expansion of renewable energydecisive»En radikal utbyggnad av den förnybara elproduktionen är avgörande« (party programme ↗)“Radical expansion of renewable electricity production is crucial”
  • state investments in renewable energy»därför behöver staten gå in med satsningar på förnybar energi« (2022 manifesto ↗)“therefore, the state needs to invest in renewable energy”
  • expanded energy capacity»Investeringar i grön teknik, industri och infrastruktur, utbyggd energikapacitet och stärkt styrning utifrån nya, skärpta klimatmål behövs.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Investments in green technology, industry and infrastructure, expanded energy capacity and stronger governance based on new, stricter climate targets are needed.”
  • local benefit from wind power»Vindkraften ska gynna både kommun och boende i närområdet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Wind power should benefit both the municipality and residents of the surrounding area.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

SSocialdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan wants to expand electricity production of all kinds and especially highlights offshore wind power as a major energy source, while bureaucratic barriers and slow permit processes shall be torn down.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants to expand electricity production of all kinds and especially highlights offshore wind power as a major energy source, while bureaucratic barriers and slow permit processes shall be torn down. It supports the counter-proposal's demand that the defence actively seeks locations and technical solutions that enable wind power expansion. The plan does not, however, directly address the relationship between wind power and the overall defence's interests.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill bygga ut elproduktionen av alla slag och lyfter särskilt havsbaserad vindkraft som en stor energikälla, samtidigt som byråkratiska hinder och långsamma tillståndsprocesser ska rivas. Det bär motförslagets krav på att försvaret aktivt söker lokaliseringar och tekniska lösningar som möjliggör vindkraftsutbyggnaden. Planen behandlar dock inte förhållandet mellan vindkraft och totalförsvarets intressen direkt.

  • expanded offshore wind powerdecisive»Vindkraft långt ute till havs kan bidra med mycket energi.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Wind power far out to sea can contribute much energy.”
  • faster permit processes»Långsamma tillståndsprocesser ska snabbas på.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Slow permit processes shall be expedited.”
  • local acceptance for wind power»Kommuner som medverkar till utbyggnad av vindkraftverk ska kunna få ekonomiskt stöd.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Municipalities that participate in wind power expansion shall be able to receive economic support.”
  • fossil-free electricity production»Stabil, tillförlitlig och fossilfri elproduktion som på lång sikt är förnybar.« (party programme ↗)“Stable, reliable and fossil-free electricity production that in the long term is renewable.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MPMiljöpartietNoNofollows the planderived

The plan's decisive commitment is rapid expansion of wind power throughout the country and that all energy shall primarily be fossil-free and renewable.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan's decisive commitment is rapid expansion of wind power throughout the country and that all energy shall primarily be fossil-free and renewable. That the defence shall actively seek locations and technical solutions that enable the expansion follows directly from that commitment. The plan also emphasizes local anchoring and returns to the places where wind power is built.

Original (Swedish)

Planens avgörande åtagande är en snabb utbyggnad av vindkraften i hela landet och att all energi i första hand ska vara fossilfri och förnybar. Att försvaret aktivt ska söka lokaliseringar och tekniska lösningar som möjliggör utbyggnaden följer direkt av det åtagandet. Planen betonar också lokal förankring och återbäring till de orter där vindkraft byggs.

  • rapid wind power expansiondecisive»bygga ut vindkraften till havs snabbt i hela landet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“rapidly expand wind power at sea throughout the country”
  • rapid expansion of renewables»se en snabb utbyggnad av förnybar energi som vindkraft« (party programme ↗)“see rapid expansion of renewable energy such as wind power”
  • fossil-free energy first»Vår främsta prioritering är att all energi ska vara fossilfri.« (party programme ↗)“Our primary priority is that all energy shall be fossil-free.”
  • local returns and acceptance»vindkraft eller gruvetableringar ska få ta del av vinsterna som uppstår« (party programme ↗)“wind power or mining establishments shall be able to share in the profits that arise”
CCenterpartietNoAbstaindeparts from the planderived

The plan wants to double renewable electricity production and establishes that licences for wind power should take a maximum of two years, with a crisis commission to speed up expansion.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants to double renewable electricity production and establishes that licences for wind power should take a maximum of two years, with a crisis commission to speed up expansion. Defence actively coordinating with the energy sector on locations and technical solutions removes precisely such an obstacle. The plan simultaneously wants to strengthen defence but does not see the goals as incompatible.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill fördubbla produktionen av utsläppsfri el och slår fast att tillstånd för vindkraft ska få ta högst två år, med en kriskommission för att snabba på utbyggnaden. Att försvaret aktivt ska samverka med energisektorn om lokaliseringar och tekniska lösningar undanröjer just ett sådant hinder. Planen vill samtidigt rusta försvaret, men ser inte målen som oförenliga.

  • faster wind power licensingdecisive»Det krävs en kriskommission för att snabbare öka Sveriges utsläppsfria elproduktion och tillstånd för vindkraft ska få ta max två år.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“A crisis commission is needed to more rapidly increase Sweden's renewable electricity production and licences for wind power should take a maximum of two years.”
  • doubled renewable electricity production»Sverige ska bli Europas gröna batteri och exportera el till grannländer som fasar ut sitt fossilberoende. Vi vill fördubbla produktionen av utsläppsfri el, och rusta och bygga ut elnätet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden shall become Europe's green battery and export electricity to neighbouring countries phasing out fossil fuel dependence. We want to double renewable electricity production and upgrade and expand the electricity network.”
  • electricity expansion target»Minst 50 TWh utsläppsfri el måste börja byggas nästa mandatperiod.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“At least 50 TWh of renewable electricity must start being built in the next term.”
  • strengthened military defence»Sverige ska försvaras. Vi vill rusta det militära försvaret snabbt, kraftfullt och långsiktigt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden shall be defended. We want to rapidly, powerfully, and sustainably strengthen military defence.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

LLiberalernaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan wants to build more solar and wind power throughout the country and calls offshore wind power an important part of a robust electricity supply, while it requires a significantly stronger military defence.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants to build more solar and wind power throughout the country and calls offshore wind power an important part of a robust electricity supply, while it requires a significantly stronger military defence. That the defence cooperates with the energy sector on localization and technical solutions is precisely the way to unite these two commitments. Therefore, the plan supports the counter-proposal's demands.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill bygga mer sol- och vindkraft i hela landet och kallar havsbaserad vindkraft en viktig del av en robust elförsörjning, samtidigt som den kräver ett betydligt starkare militärt försvar. Att försvaret samverkar med energisektorn om lokalisering och tekniska lösningar är just sättet att förena dessa två åtaganden. Därför stöder planen motförslagets krav.

  • expanded wind powerdecisive»Ska vi få ner elpriserna krävs att vi bygger inte bara kärnkraft utan också mer sol- och vindkraft i hela landet, investerar i kraftsystemet och satsar på energilagring.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“To bring down electricity prices requires that we build not only nuclear power but also more solar and wind power throughout the country, invest in the power system and bet on energy storage.”
  • offshore wind power»Havsbaserad vindkraft är en viktig del av en robust elförsörjning.« (party programme ↗)“Offshore wind power is an important part of a robust electricity supply.”
  • stronger military defence»Sverige behöver ett betydligt starkare militärt försvar än i dag.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden needs a significantly stronger military defence than today.”
  • considered localization»Utbyggnad av vindkraft ska koncentreras till redan exploaterade områden och platser med« (party programme ↗)“Expansion of wind power shall be concentrated to already exploited areas and places with”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

KDKristdemokraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The election manifesto establishes that wind power can only be a complement and should be expanded with respect for local conditions, which speaks against the defence being given the task of enabling or facilitating wind power expansion.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto establishes that wind power can only be a complement and should be expanded with respect for local conditions, which speaks against the defence being given the task of enabling or facilitating wind power expansion. The party programme makes the defence force's main task to protect people's lives, freedom and territorial integrity, not to promote a single energy source. Energy policy in the plan moreover rests on all fossil-free energy sources competing independently on an equal electricity market.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet slår fast att vindkraft bara kan vara ett komplement och ska byggas ut med respekt för lokala villkor, vilket talar emot att försvaret ges i uppdrag att verka för att möjliggöra eller underlätta vindkraftsutbyggnaden. Partiprogrammet gör försvarsmaktens huvuduppgift till att värna människors liv, frihet och territoriell integritet, inte att främja ett enskilt kraftslag. Energipolitiken i planen bygger dessutom på att alla fossilfria kraftslag ska konkurrera självständigt på en jämlik elmarknad.

  • wind power only complementdecisive»Vindkraft kan dock bara vara ett komplement.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Wind power can however only be a complement.”
  • defence's main task»Försvarsmaktens huvuduppgift är att värna människors liv och frihet.« (party programme ↗)“The defence force's main task is to protect people's lives and freedom.”
  • equal market without special treatment»konkurrera självständigt på en jämlik elmarknad.« (party programme ↗)“compete independently on an equal electricity market.”
  • territorial integrity»genom att värna territoriell integritet och utöva gränsskydd samt värna fredstida yttre« (party programme ↗)“by protecting territorial integrity and exercising border control and also protecting peacetime external”
MModeraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan's answer to electricity needs is primarily new nuclear power, not that defence should be tasked with promoting wind power expansion.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan's answer to electricity needs is primarily new nuclear power, not that defence should be tasked with promoting wind power expansion. Defence's task is described as strengthening the ability to defend the country and assert territorial integrity, which weighs more heavily than facilitating a single power source. The plan does however establish that all fossil-free energy sources should contribute.

Original (Swedish)

Planens svar på elbehovet är främst ny kärnkraft, inte att försvaret ska åläggas att verka för vindkraftsutbyggnad. Försvarets uppgift beskrivs som att stärka förmågan att försvara landet och hävda den territoriella integriteten, vilket väger tyngre än att underlätta ett enskilt kraftslag. Planen slår dock fast att alla fossilfria energikällor ska bidra.

  • nuclear power is the answer to electricity needsdecisive»I det läge Sverige har hamnat i på grund av dåliga politiska beslut kommer en utbyggnad av kärnkraften att vara helt central.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Given the situation Sweden has ended up in because of bad political decisions, expansion of nuclear power will be entirely central.”
  • defence capability comes first»Försvaret måste stärkas för att vi bättre ska kunna försvara vårt land, hävda vår territoriella integritet och värna svenska intressen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Defence must be strengthened so that we can better defend our country, assert our territorial integrity and protect Swedish interests.”
  • all fossil-free power sources contribute»Ska vi klara det behövs en elproduktion där alla fossilfria energikällor är med och bidrar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“To manage that, we need electricity production where all fossil-free energy sources are involved and contribute.”
SDSverigedemokraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The counter-proposal wishes the defence actively to work to enable and facilitate wind power expansion.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The counter-proposal wishes the defence actively to work to enable and facilitate wind power expansion. The election manifesto, on the contrary, states that marine and water environments must be prioritized more clearly before extensive wind power expansion, values the municipal veto against wind power and points out nuclear power as the plannable solution. Making the defence a facilitator of wind power is therefore not the plan's line.

Original (Swedish)

Motförslaget vill att försvaret aktivt verkar för att möjliggöra och underlätta vindkraftsutbyggnaden. Valmanifestet slår tvärtom fast att havs- och vattenmiljön måste prioriteras tydligare framför omfattande vindkraftsutbyggnad, värnar det kommunala vetot mot vindkraft och pekar ut kärnkraften som den planerbara lösningen. Att göra försvaret till en möjliggörare för vindkraft är därmed inte planens linje.

  • restrained wind power expansiondecisive»Vår havs- och vattenmiljö måste prioriteras tydligare framför ett allt för intensivt fiske och omfattande vindkraftsutbyggnad.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Our marine and water environments must be prioritized more clearly before excessive fishing and extensive wind power expansion.”
  • municipal veto against wind power»Värna det kommunala vetot vid etablering av vindkraft« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Value the municipal veto in establishing wind power”
  • nuclear power as plannable base»Skapa förutsättningar för ny kärnkraft i Sverige och en färdplan för byggandet av SMR-reaktorer« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Create conditions for new nuclear power in Sweden and a roadmap for building SMR reactors”
  • defence capability comes first»Återupprätta ett totalförsvar som är rustat för krig« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Restore a total defence that is equipped for war”

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament