2023-04-192022/23:JuU17 · p.3JuUJustice

Supervision of Shooting Ranges

Oversight responsibility and rules for shooting ranges

What's at stake: The issue concerns which authority should have oversight responsibility for shooting ranges and how strict the safety requirements for running shooting activities should be. It affects hunters' and sport shooters' ability to train, as well as how shooting ranges are run and inspected.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The motions called for supervisory responsibility for shooting ranges to be moved away from the Police Authority and for the rules on shooting ranges to be reviewed, while the committee held that announcements already made on the issue make further action unnecessary.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee rejects the motions, pointing out that in the past two years parliament has already made two announcements to the government about moving oversight responsibility for shooting ranges away from the Police Authority, and therefore sees no grounds for either a new announcement or a review of the rules for shooting ranges.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 1 (C)

The reserving party (C) wants the government to develop a national regulatory framework that lets Swedish shooting ranges keep operating without unreasonable safety requirements that hinder things like hunting-practice trails or target shooting on private land, and favours voluntary, competence-building measures and simpler rules over rigid regulation.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by C.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
VYesYes 21/0/0/3follows the planconfidence: lownot addressed
SYesYes 93/0/0/14follows the planconfidence: lownot addressed
MPYesYes 16/0/0/2follows the planconfidence: lownot addressed
Cown reservationNoNo 0/21/0/3follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
LNoYes 14/0/0/2departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
KDNoYes 17/0/0/2departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
MNoYes 59/0/0/9departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
SDNoYes 64/0/0/9departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed

Committee proposal

The Riksdag rejects the motions 2022/23:603 by Marléne Lund Kopparklint (M) demands 1 and 3 as well as 2022/23:855 by Daniel Bäckström et al. (C) demand 18.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2022/23:603 av Marléne Lund Kopparklint (M) yrkandena 1 och 3 samt 2022/23:855 av Daniel Bäckström m.fl. (C) yrkande 18.

Riksdag decision: The Riksdag has dealt with 15 proposals in motions submitted during the general motion period. The proposals address, among other things, processing of firearms licence cases and firearms crimes. The Riksdag rejected the motions, among other things by referring to the fact that investigative and preparatory work is already ongoing in the matters that the proposals address.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The plan does not address supervision of shooting ranges, but it binds the party to a struggle against access to firearms and to pushing back firearms violence.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan does not address supervision of shooting ranges, but it binds the party to a struggle against access to firearms and to pushing back firearms violence. Easing security requirements and replacing regulations with voluntary measures pulls in the opposite direction. The conclusion is therefore negative, but the basis is weak since the plan does not address the question directly.

Original (Swedish)

Planen tar inte upp tillsynen av skjutbanor, men den binder partiet till en kamp mot tillgången till skjutvapen och till att skjutvapenvåldet ska tryckas tillbaka. Att lätta på säkerhetskrav och ersätta föreskrifter med frivilliga insatser drar i motsatt riktning. Slutsatsen är därför avvisande, men underlaget är svagt eftersom planen inte behandlar frågan direkt.

  • limit firearm accessdecisive»kamp mot tillgången till illegala skjutvapen och ett effektivt avhopparprogram, men framför allt med en kamp mot kriminalitetens djupare orsaker« (2022 manifesto ↗)“struggle against access to illegal firearms and an effective exit programme, but above all a struggle against the deeper causes of crime”
  • safety from firearms violence»Föräldrar ska inte behöva oroa sig över skjutvapenvåld och drömma mardrömmar om att deras barn ska drabbas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Parents should not have to worry about firearms violence and have nightmares about their children being hit.”
SSocialdemokraternaYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The documents do not address shooting ranges.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The documents do not address shooting ranges. The closest lying principles are the election manifesto's measures against illegal weapons, the party programme's requirement that all environmental impact in the form of emissions is minimized and that activities are organized so that everyone can feel safe as to life and health. Derived from that a line that wants to ease security requirements and put voluntariness before regulations is rejected, but the foundation is weak.

Original (Swedish)

Dokumenten behandlar inte skjutbanor. Närmast liggande principer är valmanifestets krafttag mot illegala vapen, partiprogrammets krav att all miljöpåverkan i form av utsläpp minimeras och att verksamhet organiseras så att alla kan känna trygghet till liv och hälsa. Härlett därav avvisas en linje som vill lätta på säkerhetskrav och sätta frivillighet före föreskrifter, men underlaget är svagt.

  • minimized environmental impactdecisive»miljöpåverkan i form av utsläpp och avfallsprodukter ska minimeras.« (party programme ↗)“environmental impact in the form of emissions and waste products shall be minimized.”
  • strict weapon control»Vi vill ta krafttag mot införsel av vapen och narkotika, bland annat genom stärkt gränskontroll.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to take measures against the import of weapons and drugs, among other things through strengthened border control.”
  • safety as to life and health»Det måste organiseras så att alla kan känna trygghet till liv« (party programme ↗)“It must be organized so that everyone can feel safe as to life”
MPMiljöpartietYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The plan does not address shooting ranges.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan does not address shooting ranges. The closest principles are that law enforcement authorities shall have the tools needed for security and that the precautionary principle shall be applied, with heavy metals among the emissions that shall explicitly be reduced. A regulatory framework that eases security and environmental requirements for shooting ranges contradicts this, but the basis is weak.

Original (Swedish)

Planen behandlar inte skjutbanor. Närmast liggande principer är att de rättsvårdande myndigheterna ska ha de verktyg som krävs för trygghet och att försiktighetsprincipen ska tillämpas, med tungmetaller bland de utsläpp som uttryckligen ska minska. Ett regelverk som lättar på säkerhets- och miljökrav för skjutbanor står mot detta, men underlaget är svagt.

  • authorities' control toolsdecisive»Rättssäkerheten ska tryggas samtidigt som de rättsvårdande myndigheterna ska ges de verktyg som krävs för att bekämpa kriminaliteten och öka tryggheten i samhället.« (party programme ↗)“Legal certainty shall be secured while law enforcement authorities shall be given the tools needed to combat crime and increase security in society.”
  • apply the precautionary principle»För att skydda miljön ska försiktighetsprincipen tillämpas så långt det är möjligt.« (party programme ↗)“To protect the environment the precautionary principle shall be applied as far as is possible.”
  • reduce heavy metals»Utsläpp av miljöstörande ämnen såsom kväve, fosfor, läkemedelsrester, hormonstörande ämnen, tungmetaller och nanopartiklar ska reduceras« (party programme ↗)“Emissions of environmentally harmful substances such as nitrogen, phosphorus, pharmaceutical residues, endocrine-disrupting substances, heavy metals and nanoparticles shall be reduced”
CCenterpartietNoNofollows the plannot addressed

The plan wants to clear out redundant rules and bureaucracy and highlights regulatory simplification as a way to increase rural residents' freedom and self-determination over their own land.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants to clear out redundant rules and bureaucracy and highlights regulatory simplification as a way to increase rural residents' freedom and self-determination over their own land. A national framework allowing shooting ranges to operate without unreasonable safety requirements, with voluntary and competency-enhancing measures, aligns with this and with the plan's support for active hunting and wildlife management. However, shooting ranges are not explicitly mentioned.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill rensa bort överflödiga regler och byråkrati och lyfter regelförenklingar som ett sätt att öka landsbygdsbornas frihet och självbestämmande över sin egen mark. Ett nationellt regelverk som låter skjutbanor verka utan orimliga säkerhetskrav, med frivilliga och kompetenshöjande insatser, ligger i linje med det och med planens stöd för aktiv jakt och viltförvaltning. Skjutbanor nämns dock inte uttryckligen.

  • eliminate redundant regulationsdecisive»Vi ska rensa upp bland överflödiga regler och byråkrati.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We shall clear out redundant rules and bureaucracy.”
  • regulatory simplification for rural areas»Regelförenklingar, skattesänkningar, gårdsförsäljning av alkohol och ett mer tillväxtvänligt strandskydd är bara några av de reformer som måste komma på plats för att stärka landsbygdens konkurrenskraft och öka människors frihet och självbestämmande.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Regulatory simplification, tax cuts, farm sales of alcohol, and a more growth-friendly shoreline protection are just some of the reforms that must be put in place to strengthen rural competitiveness and increase people's freedom and self-determination.”
  • right to use own land»Äganderätten är central för ett samhälle där människor kan förverkliga sig själva och sina drömmar.« (party programme ↗)“Property rights are central to a society where people can realise themselves and their dreams.”
  • active hunting and wildlife management»ska kombineras med en aktiv förvaltning av rovdjur och klövvilt« (party programme ↗)“shall be combined with active management of predators and cloven-hoofed game”
LLiberalernaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan does not address oversight of or regulations for shooting ranges.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan does not address oversight of or regulations for shooting ranges. The closest lying principle is Liberal vigilance against expanded public power claims, the ambition to reduce regulatory burden and the requirement that the state shall cooperate with landowners. Based on these principles, the plan leans towards simpler and more uniform rules rather than rigid regulations, but the evidence is weak.

Original (Swedish)

Planen behandlar inte tillsyn av eller regelverk för skjutbanor. Närmast liggande princip är den liberala vaksamheten mot ökade offentliga maktanspråk, ambitionen att minska regelbördan och kravet att staten ska samverka med markägare. Utifrån dessa principer lutar planen mot enklare och mer enhetliga regler framför fyrkantiga föreskrifter, men underlaget är svagt.

  • scepticism against public powerdecisive»en sund skepsis mot ökade offentliga maktanspråk« (party programme ↗)“a healthy scepticism against expanded public power claims”
  • reduced regulatory burden»Regelbördan för små företag ska minska« (party programme ↗)“The regulatory burden on small enterprises shall decrease”
  • cooperation with landowners»Staten ska sträva efter god samverkan med markägare och lokalbefolkning i naturvård« (party programme ↗)“The state shall strive for good cooperation with landowners and local communities in nature conservation”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

KDKristdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan sees hunting, fishing and wildlife management as applied stewardship and wants the public to actively facilitate access to hunting.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan sees hunting, fishing and wildlife management as applied stewardship and wants the public to actively facilitate access to hunting. A regulatory framework that lets shooting ranges continue to operate without unreasonable safety requirements, with voluntary and competence-enhancing measures, aligns with this and with the link between land ownership and hunting rights. The election manifesto's demand for regulatory relief for rural industries points in the same direction.

Original (Swedish)

Planen ser jakt, fiske och viltvård som tillämpat förvaltarskap och vill att det offentliga aktivt underlättar tillgång till jakt. Ett regelverk som låter skjutbanor verka vidare utan orimliga säkerhetskrav, med frivilliga och kompetenshöjande insatser, ligger i linje med detta och med kopplingen mellan markägande och jakträtt. Valmanifestets krav på regellättnader för landsbygdens näringar pekar i samma riktning.

  • hunting as stewardshipdecisive»Jakt, fiske och viltvård är en del i bevarandet av den« (party programme ↗)“Hunting, fishing and wildlife management are a part in the preservation of the”
  • facilitate access to hunting»det offentliga vidtar olika åtgärder för att bereda marklösa jägare tillgång till jakt på offentligt ägd mark.« (party programme ↗)“the public carries out various measures to provide landless hunters access to hunting on publicly owned land.”
  • ownership rights and own use»för den enskilda äganderätten och generationers erfarenhet av enskilt ägande av skogs- och jordbruksmark« (party programme ↗)“for individual ownership rights and generations' experience of private ownership of forest and agricultural land”
  • regulatory relief in rural areas»Regeländringar och kostnadslättnader för svenskt lantbruk för att öka Sveriges självförsörjning och stärka lantbrukets konkurrenskraft.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Rule changes and cost reductions for Swedish agriculture to increase Sweden's self-sufficiency and strengthen agriculture's competitiveness.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MModeraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan establishes that weapons regulation should not adversely affect hunters, sport shooters and weapons collectors and wishes to shorten processing times for weapons licenses.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan establishes that weapons regulation should not adversely affect hunters, sport shooters and weapons collectors and wishes to shorten processing times for weapons licenses. A national framework that allows shooting ranges to continue without unreasonable safety requirements aligns with that, as does the plan's general requirement for reduced bureaucratic red tape. The plan does not however express itself on supervisory responsibility for shooting ranges.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att vapenregleringen inte ska drabba jägare, sportskyttar och vapensamlare negativt och vill korta handläggningstiderna för vapenlicenser. Ett nationellt regelverk som låter skjutbanor fortsätta utan orimliga säkerhetskrav ligger i linje med det, liksom med planens generella krav på minskat regelkrångel. Planen uttalar sig dock inte om tillsynsansvaret för skjutbanor.

  • the shooter should not be affected by regulationsdecisive»Det är viktigt att EU:s vapendirektiv inte genomförs i svensk lagstiftning så att du som är jägare, sportskytt eller vapensamlare drabbas negativt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is important that the EU's weapons directive is not implemented in Swedish legislation so that you as a hunter, sport shooter or weapons collector are not adversely affected.”
  • simpler weapons handling»Arbeta för kortade handläggningstider för vapenlicenser« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Work for shortened processing times for weapons licenses”
  • hunting should be valued»Den svenska jakten är också en viktig del av vår kultur.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Swedish hunting is also an important part of our culture.”
  • reduced bureaucratic red tape»Ta bort en tredjedel av företagens administrationskostnader och en tredjedel av regelkrånglet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Remove one-third of companies' administrative costs and one-third of bureaucratic red tape”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

SDSverigedemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan states that measures that should have been directed at illegal weapons instead hit legal weapons possession, hunters and sport shooters, and wishes to stop this harassment.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan states that measures that should have been directed at illegal weapons instead hit legal weapons possession, hunters and sport shooters, and wishes to stop this harassment. It also values the right to own weapons and engage in hunting and opposes rules that only make legal weapons ownership more difficult. A national regulation allowing shooting ranges to operate without unreasonable safety requirements follows from this. The plan says nothing about the committee's reasons that the demand has already been submitted to the government.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att åtgärder som borde riktats mot illegala vapen i stället drabbat legalt vapeninnehav, jägare och sportskyttar, och vill stoppa den hetsjakten. Den värnar också rätten att äga vapen och ägna sig åt jakt och vänder sig mot regler som enbart försvårar legalt vapenägande. Ett nationellt regelverk som låter skjutbanor verka utan orimliga säkerhetskrav följer av detta. Planen säger inget om utskottets skäl att kravet redan framförts till regeringen.

  • protection for legal weapons ownersdecisive»Samtidigt har politiska åtgärder som borde riktats mot illegala vapen och gängbrottslighet istället riktats mot legalt vapeninnehav, svenska jägare och sportskyttar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Meanwhile, political measures that should have been directed at illegal weapons and gang crime have instead been directed at legal weapons possession, Swedish hunters and sport shooters.”
  • stop harassment of hunters»Stoppa hetsjakten på jägare och legala vapeninnehavare« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Stop the harassment of hunters and legal weapons owners”
  • valued hunting and weapons ownership»Möjligheten att äga jaktvapen och att ägna sig åt jakt ska värnas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The possibility of owning hunting weapons and engaging in hunting shall be valued.”
  • criticism of burdensome weapons rules»Magasinsreglering och förbud mot bly i ammunition är exempel på åtgärder som görs för att försvåra legalt vapenägande.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Magazine regulation and bans on lead in ammunition are examples of measures taken to make legal weapons ownership more difficult.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament