2025-06-172024/25:MJU23 · p.4MJUEnvironment & agriculture
Food Supply and Employment
Aquaculture's contribution to food security and employment
What's at stake: The decision concerns aquaculture businesses' growth potential and the rural jobs they can create, as well as Sweden's food security, and turns on whether the regulatory reform alone is enough or whether the government should pursue the issue more actively.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the Riksdag should call on the government to further strengthen aquaculture's contribution to food security and employment, or whether no action beyond the regulatory reform already proposed is needed at this time.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee assesses that the proposed regulatory reform is enough to improve the conditions for increased aquaculture production, employment and food security, intends to follow the issue with interest but currently sees no grounds for further action, and therefore rejects the motions.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 6 (S)
The reservation (S) argues that there is enormous growth potential for aquaculture, where Sweden could be a role model within a circular blue economy, and calls on the government to pursue the issue further so that sustainable fish farming with high environmental standards can protect wild fish stocks while creating jobs in rural areas.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 6 by S.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have gone the other way
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: CCenterpartiet
Ja 125–94Nej 104–115
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Abstain 0/0/20/4 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| S | No | No 0/93/0/13 | match | confidence: medium | derived |
| MP | No | Yes 15/0/0/3 | differs | confidence: low | derived |
| C | No | Yes 21/0/0/3 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| L | No | Yes 14/0/0/2 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| KD | No | Yes 16/0/0/3 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| M | No | Yes 59/0/0/9 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| SD | No | Abstain 0/0/63/9 | differs | confidence: high | explicit |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2024/25:1369 by Martin Kinnunen et al. (SD) amendment 34 and 2024/25:3108 by Anna-Caren Sätherberg et al. (S) amendment 52.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2024/25:1369 av Martin Kinnunen m.fl. (SD) yrkande 34 och 2024/25:3108 av Anna-Caren Sätherberg m.fl. (S) yrkande 52.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag approved the government's proposal on new rules for aquaculture. The term aquaculture is used for activities that cultivate aquatic animals and plants such as fish, mussels, crustaceans and algae. To engage in aquaculture today, several permits are required according to different legislation and by different authorities, among other things from an environmental perspective. The potential environmental impact of aquaculture shall, according to the proposal, be assessed solely based on the Environmental Code's rules on environmentally hazardous activities. This means that the person conducting aquaculture shall not need to apply for cultivation permits for the activity the potential impact the activity has on surrounding environments shall be considered according to environmental legislation instead of according to the Fisheries Act the government, or the authority the government determines, shall have the right to determine rules for, for example, which organisms may be cultured in different water areas the rule that aquaculture must seek permission for water activities according to the Environmental Code, that is, for example, get its water facility approved, is abolished. The legislative amendments come into force 1 July 2026. The Riksdag rejected a number of proposals in motions on aquaculture, of which 13 were submitted during the general motion period 2024.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to develop sustainable fish farming with high environmental requirements to protect wild fish stocks. (S) — Reservation 6
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan sees investment in sustainable food production as part of the green transition and gives the state a particular responsibility for the country becoming more self-sufficient in food.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan sees investment in sustainable food production as part of the green transition and gives the state a particular responsibility for the country becoming more self-sufficient in food. The counter-proposal's requirements for continued measures for sustainable fish farming with high environmental standards, which protect wild stocks and create jobs in rural areas, lie within that framework. The plan also wants to ensure that rural areas are not depleted.
Original (Swedish)
Planen ser satsningar på hållbar livsmedelsproduktion som en del av den gröna omställningen och ger staten ett särskilt ansvar för att landet blir mer självförsörjande på livsmedel. Motförslagets krav på fortsatta åtgärder för hållbar fiskuppfödning med höga miljökrav, som skyddar vilda bestånd och ger jobb på landsbygden, ligger inom den ramen. Planen vill också att landsbygden inte utarmas.
- sustainable food productiondecisive»En annan viktig del i den gröna omställningen är satsningar på hållbar livsmedelsproduktion.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Another important part of the green transition is investment in sustainable food production.”
- increased food self-sufficiency»bli mer självförsörjande på energi och livsmedel.« (party programme ↗)“become more self-sufficient in energy and food.”
- jobs and life in rural areas»Oavsett var i landet vi bor så har vi ett gemensamt intresse av att landsbygden inte utarmas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Regardless of where in the country we live, we have a common interest in rural areas not being depleted.”
- sustainability for ecosystems»Jordbrukets långsiktiga hållbarhet är viktig för både ekosystemen och« (party programme ↗)“Agriculture's long-term sustainability is important for both ecosystems and”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The party programme wants to see a viable Swedish food production that strengthens the country's self-sufficiency and a rural policy for development and wellbeing throughout the country.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme wants to see a viable Swedish food production that strengthens the country's self-sufficiency and a rural policy for development and wellbeing throughout the country. A sustainable aquaculture with high environmental requirements combines this with the goal of shifting to circular economy and protection of water environments. The counter-proposal's demands for continued measures are thereby in the plan's direction.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet vill se en livskraftig svensk livsmedelsproduktion som stärker självförsörjningsförmågan och en landsbygdspolitik för utveckling och välstånd i hela landet. Ett hållbart vattenbruk med höga miljökrav förenar detta med målet om omställning till cirkulär ekonomi och värn av vattenmiljöerna. Motförslagets krav på fortsatta åtgärder ligger därmed i planens riktning.
- strengthened food productiondecisive»Livskraftig svensk livsmedelsproduktion som stärker landets självförsörjningsförmåga.« (party programme ↗)“Viable Swedish food production that strengthens the country's self-sufficiency.”
- employment in rural areas»Landsbygdspolitik för utveckling och välstånd i hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“Rural policy for development and wellbeing throughout the country.”
- circular economy»Omställning till cirkulär ekonomi, för bättre användning av befintliga resurser.« (party programme ↗)“Shifting to circular economy, for better use of existing resources.”
- protection of water environments»Värn av biologisk mångfald och Sveriges värdefulla natur och vattenmiljöer.« (party programme ↗)“Protection of biodiversity and Sweden's valuable nature and water environments.”
The counter-proposal conditions continued aquaculture development with high environmental requirements and protection of wild fish stocks, which is close to the plan's demands for responsible fishing that rebuilds depleted stocks and for ecosystem-based sea management.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal conditions continued aquaculture development with high environmental requirements and protection of wild fish stocks, which is close to the plan's demands for responsible fishing that rebuilds depleted stocks and for ecosystem-based sea management. The plan also wants to strengthen food supply and sees green jobs in the countryside as desirable. However, the support applies only as long as the environmental requirements are genuinely high.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslaget villkorar fortsatt vattenbruksutveckling med höga miljökrav och skydd av vilda fiskbestånd, vilket ligger nära planens krav på ett ansvarsfullt fiske som återuppbygger utfiskade bestånd och på ekosystembaserad havsförvaltning. Planen vill också stärka livsmedelsförsörjningen och ser gröna jobb på landsbygden som eftersträvansvärda. Stödet gäller dock bara så länge miljökraven verkligen är höga.
- ecosystems set the limitsdecisive»låt ekosystemen i haven sätta gränserna för hur mycket fisk som får fångas, inför en ekosystembaserad havsförvaltning och gå över till skonsamma fiskemetoder.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“let ecosystems in the sea set the limits on how much fish can be caught, introduce ecosystem-based sea management and transition to gentler fishing methods.”
- responsible fishing»Sverige ska vara pådrivande inom EU och globala organisationer för ett ansvarsfullt fiske som återuppbygger utfiskade bestånd och inte tar ut mer än återväxten.« (party programme ↗)“Sweden shall be a driving force within the EU and global organizations for responsible fishing that rebuilds depleted stocks and does not take more than the regrowth.”
- strengthened food supply»stärka det svenska jordbruket för ökad självförsörjning med baslivsmedel, och stödja övergången till ett ekologiskt och hållbart jordbruk med fossiloberoende arbetsmaskiner.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“strengthen Swedish agriculture for increased self-sufficiency in staple foods, and support the transition to ecological and sustainable agriculture with fossil-free farming machinery.”
- green jobs in the countryside»Investeringar i natur- och kulturmiljövård samt utveckling av modern ekoturism kan ge många gröna jobb.« (party programme ↗)“Investments in nature and cultural heritage conservation as well as development of modern ecotourism can create many green jobs.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The party programme explicitly points out aquaculture as a green sector with great potential that must be realized and that can create employment in the countryside.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme explicitly points out aquaculture as a green sector with great potential that must be realized and that can create employment in the countryside. The counter-proposal's requirement for continued measures for sustainable fish farming with high environmental standards and jobs in the countryside is the same commitment. The election manifesto's promise to strengthen the competitiveness of green sectors and to protect the marine environment and small-scale fishing reinforces the conclusion.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet pekar uttryckligen ut vattenbruket som en grön näring med stor potential som måste tas till vara och som kan skapa sysselsättning på landsbygden. Motförslagets krav på fortsatta åtgärder för hållbar fiskuppfödning med höga miljökrav och jobb på landsbygden är samma åtagande. Valmanifestets löfte att stärka de gröna näringarnas konkurrenskraft och att skydda havsmiljön och den småskaliga fiskenäringen stärker slutsatsen.
- aquaculture's potentialdecisive»Även vattenbruket är en grön näring med stor potential som måste tas till vara. Det kan såväl producera mat och biomassa av hög kvalitet som skapa sysselsättning på landsbygden.« (party programme ↗)“Aquaculture is also a green sector with great potential that must be realized. It can both produce food and biomass of high quality and create employment in the countryside.”
- strengthened green sectors»Vi vill stärka de gröna näringarnas konkurrenskraft.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to strengthen the competitiveness of green sectors.”
- protected marine environment and fishing»Skadlig bottentrålning ska inte få förstöra för varken havsmiljön, den småskaliga fiskenäringen eller sportfisket.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Destructive bottom trawling should not be allowed to destroy the marine environment, small-scale fishing or sport fishing.”
- circular economy»Sverige ska bli världens mest resurseffektiva land och ekonomin mer cirkulär.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden shall become the world's most resource-efficient country and the economy more circular.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan requires that fisheries are conducted on a long-term sustainable basis within what the stocks can tolerate and that regulations favour small-scale and coastal fishing, which is close to the counter-proposal's requirement for sustainable fish farming with high environmental requirements that protect wild stocks.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that fisheries are conducted on a long-term sustainable basis within what the stocks can tolerate and that regulations favour small-scale and coastal fishing, which is close to the counter-proposal's requirement for sustainable fish farming with high environmental requirements that protect wild stocks. It also wants to strengthen the conditions for enterprise and growth throughout the country and create jobs and future hope outside the major cities. Further measures for sustainable aquaculture therefore follow from the plan's line.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att fisket bedrivs långsiktigt hållbart inom vad bestånden tål och att regelverket gynnar småskaligt och kustnära fiske, vilket ligger nära motförslagets krav på hållbar fiskuppfödning med höga miljökrav som skyddar vilda bestånd. Den vill dessutom stärka förutsättningarna för företagande och tillväxt i hela landet och skapa jobb och framtidstro utanför storstäderna. Fortsatta åtgärder för ett hållbart vattenbruk följer därför av planens linje.
- sustainable fishing within stocksdecisive»Fisket måste bedrivas på ett långsiktigt hållbart sätt och hålla sig inom ramen för vetenskapliga« (party programme ↗)“Fishing must be conducted in a long-term sustainable way and stay within the framework of scientific”
- favoured small-scale fishing»Regelverket ska gynna småskaligt och kustnära fiske« (party programme ↗)“Regulations shall favour small-scale and coastal fishing”
- enterprise throughout the country»företagande, innovationer och tillväxt ska stärkas i hela landet« (party programme ↗)“enterprise, innovation and growth shall be strengthened throughout the country”
- jobs in the countryside»Jobb och framtidstro i hela landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Jobs and future hope throughout the country.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan requires that the Swedish fishing industry be given conditions to remain viable and that all use of natural resources be done with regard to the stewardship principle, while excessive fishing harvest damages both industry and stocks.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that the Swedish fishing industry be given conditions to remain viable and that all use of natural resources be done with regard to the stewardship principle, while excessive fishing harvest damages both industry and stocks. Sustainable fish farming with high environmental requirements responds to both these commitments and to the plan's requirements for secure food supply. That differentiated rural enterprise shall be facilitated carries the demand for jobs in rural areas.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att den svenska fiskerinäringen ges förutsättningar att förbli livskraftig och att allt nyttjande av naturresurser sker med hänsyn till förvaltarskapsprincipen, samtidigt som ett alltför omfattande fiskeuttag skadar både näring och bestånd. Hållbar fiskuppfödning med höga miljökrav svarar mot båda dessa åtaganden och mot planens krav på en säker livsmedelsförsörjning. Att differentierat landsbygdsföretagande ska underlättas bär kravet på jobb på landsbygden.
- viable fishing industrydecisive»Den svenska fiskerinäringen måste ges förutsättningar att även i framtiden vara livskraftig.« (party programme ↗)“The Swedish fishing industry must be given conditions to also in future be viable.”
- protect wild stocks»Ett alltför omfattande fiskeuttag gynnar ingen utan resulterar endast i att tillgången sinar« (party programme ↗)“An excessive fishing harvest benefits no one but merely results in the supply diminishing”
- secure food supply»Förvaltarskapsprincipen ska vara vägledande vid utformandet av en säker livsmedelsförsörjning.« (party programme ↗)“The stewardship principle shall guide the shaping of a secure food supply.”
- rural enterprise»Även differentierat landsbygdsföretagande ska underlättas.« (party programme ↗)“Differentiated rural enterprise shall also be facilitated.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The counter-proposal wishes to see continued measures so that sustainable aquaculture can grow and create jobs in the countryside.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal wishes to see continued measures so that sustainable aquaculture can grow and create jobs in the countryside. The plan states that Sweden must reduce its vulnerability and increase its self-sufficiency in food and that the food strategy should be strengthened. The plan also establishes that the fishing industry's decline must be stopped, which argues for farming with high environmental requirements that relieves wild stocks.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslaget vill se fortsatta åtgärder så att hållbart vattenbruk kan växa och skapa jobb på landsbygden. Planen anger att Sverige måste minska sin sårbarhet och öka självförsörjningsgraden av livsmedel och att livsmedelsstrategin ska förstärkas. Planen slår också fast att fiskerinäringens tillbakagång måste brytas, vilket talar för odling med höga miljökrav som avlastar vilda bestånd.
- increased self-sufficiencydecisive»Det nya säkerhetsläget i Europa gör att vi som land måste minska vår sårbarhet och öka vår självförsörjningsgrad.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The new security situation in Europe means that we as a nation must reduce our vulnerability and increase our self-sufficiency.”
- strengthened food strategy»Förstärka livsmedelsstrategin« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen the food strategy”
- save the fishing industry»Fiskerinäringen har drabbats hårt av minskade bestånd på senare år inte minst på grund av det kustnära trålfisket – den utvecklingen måste brytas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The fishing industry has been hard hit by declining stocks in recent years not least due to coastal trawling – that development must be stopped.”
- increased domestic production»Stärka jordbruket för att öka den inhemska produktionen av livsmedel« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen agriculture to increase domestic food production”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan explicitly points out that fish farms move to neighbouring countries as a result of policy that shuts down industries.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly points out that fish farms move to neighbouring countries as a result of policy that shuts down industries. It requires increased food self-sufficiency and policy that harnesses rural values and creates more activities and jobs with well-balanced environmental consideration. The counter-proposal's requirement for continued measures for sustainable aquaculture follows directly from this.
Original (Swedish)
Planen pekar uttryckligen ut att fiskodlingar flyttar till grannländerna som ett resultat av en politik som stänger ner näringar. Den kräver ökad självförsörjning av livsmedel och en politik som tar tillvara landsbygdens värden och skapar fler verksamheter och jobb med väl avvägd miljöhänsyn. Motförslagets krav på fortsatta åtgärder för hållbart vattenbruk följer direkt av detta.
- fish farming should not be shut downdecisive»Regeringens strategi under två mandatperioder har strävat efter att stänga ner. Gruvor får inte startas, fiskodlingar flyttas till våra grannländer och skog tas ut ur produktion mot markägarnas vilja.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Government's strategy over two terms has aimed to shut down. Mines are not allowed to start, fish farms move to our neighbouring countries and forest is taken out of production against landowners' will.”
- increased self-sufficiency»Öka det svenska jordbrukets konkurrenskraft och Sveriges självförsörjning av livsmedel« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Increase Swedish agriculture's competitiveness and Sweden's food self-sufficiency”
- jobs in rural areas»Sverige behöver en politik som tar till vara värdet ute i landsbygden och som gör det enklare att i kombination med en väl avvägd miljöhänsyn att skapa fler verksamheter, jobb och ökad tillväxt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden needs policy that harnesses the value in the countryside and that makes it easier, combined with well-balanced environmental consideration, to create more activities, jobs and increased growth.”
- business throughout the country»Underlätta för industri och näringsliv i hela landet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Facilitate industry and business throughout the country”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2024/25:MJU23)
- Committee report full text (HC01MJU23)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2024/25:1369 — Svenskt fiske och vattenbruk av Martin Kinnunen m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1832 — Vattenbruksnäringen av Jennie Wernäng och Marléne Lund Kopparklint (båda M)
- Motion 2024/25:2485 — Natur och biologisk mångfald av Stina Larsson m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2024/25:2486 — Vatten, hav och fiske av Stina Larsson m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2024/25:2980 — En levande och välmående skärgård av Markus Wiechel m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:3108 — Utgiftsområde 23 Areella näringar, landsbygd och livsmedel av Anna-Caren Sätherberg m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2024/25:3362 — med anledning av prop. 2024/25:136 Förbättrade förutsättningar för ett hållbart vattenbruk av Andrea Andersson Tay m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2024/25:3371 — med anledning av prop. 2024/25:136 Förbättrade förutsättningar för ett hållbart vattenbruk av Anders Karlsson m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2024/25:3387 — med anledning av prop. 2024/25:136 Förbättrade förutsättningar för ett hållbart vattenbruk av Emma Nohrén m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2024/25:996 — Stärk det svenska vattenbruket av Rickard Nordin (C)
- Proposition 2024/25:136 — Förbättrade förutsättningar för ett hållbart vattenbruk
Source: The Swedish Parliament