2026-02-172025/26:SoU13 · p.1SoUHealth & social services
Goals for ANDTS policy
Setting new goals for alcohol, drug, doping, tobacco and gambling (ANDTS) policy
What's at stake: The question concerns how Sweden's overall policy against alcohol, drugs, doping, tobacco and problem gambling should be steered going forward, and whether the Riksdag should press the government for new goal language now or wait for a broader review. The outcome affects, among other things, how quickly efforts against addiction and drug-related harm can be developed.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The motions called for the Riksdag to state new positions on the goals for various parts of ANDTS policy (including drug and alcohol policy), while the committee held that the Riksdag should wait for the ongoing work within the Government Offices on a revised ANDTS strategy before formulating new goals.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee rejects the motions, pointing out that a revision of the goals for drug, tobacco and gambling policy is already being prepared within the Government Offices — partly based on the report of the Drug Policy Inquiry — and that the Riksdag should not preempt this work with new pronouncements on the goal formulation for the various parts of ANDTS policy.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 1 (S)
The reserving party (S) wants the government to ensure that the long-term goal of a drug-free society remains firm, and opposes the idea of legalizing or decriminalizing drug substances as a way to reduce criminal gangs' revenues and the societal harms of drugs.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by S.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have held
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: KDKristdemokraterna, LLiberalerna
Ja 174–93Ja 143–124
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Abstain 0/0/19/3 | differs | confidence: low | not addressed |
| S | No | No 0/92/0/14 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| MP | Yes | Abstain 0/0/16/2 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| C | Yes | Yes 21/0/0/3 | match | confidence: low | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 14/0/0/2 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| KD | No | Yes 17/0/0/2 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| M | No | Yes 59/0/0/9 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| SD | No | Yes 62/0/0/9 | differs | confidence: high | not addressed |
Committee proposal
Parliament rejects the motions 2025/26:505 by Ulrika Westerlund et al. (MP) items 1 and 3, 2025/26:2799 by Karin Rågsjö et al. (V) item 6, 2025/26:3505 by Nils Seye Larsen et al. (MP) item 6 and 2025/26:3645 by Fredrik Lundh Sammeli et al. (S) item 161.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2025/26:505 av Ulrika Westerlund m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 1 och 3, 2025/26:2799 av Karin Rågsjö m.fl. (V) yrkande 6, 2025/26:3505 av Nils Seye Larsen m.fl. (MP) yrkande 6 och 2025/26:3645 av Fredrik Lundh Sammeli m.fl. (S) yrkande 161.
Riksdag decision: Parliament rejected 120 proposals on alcohol, narcotics, doping, tobacco and gambling in motions from the general motion period of 2025. The proposals deal with ANDTS policy, which includes, among other things, alcohol issues, narcotics issues and tobacco and nicotine issues. Parliament refers mainly to ongoing work.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants the long-term goal of drug policy to remain as the foundation for society's opposition to drug use. (S) — Reservation 1
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan holds to a restrictive line and demands effective work against narcotics at all levels, from prevention to police work, and that customs and police resources increase to stem the money driving narcotics trade.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan holds to a restrictive line and demands effective work against narcotics at all levels, from prevention to police work, and that customs and police resources increase to stem the money driving narcotics trade. This speaks for the counter-proposal's demand for a continued goal of a drug-free society without legalization. At the same time, the plan emphasizes care and respectful treatment of people in substance abuse, which pulls in the opposite direction and lowers security.
Original (Swedish)
Planen håller fast vid en restriktiv linje och kräver ett effektivt arbete mot narkotika i alla led, från det förebyggande till polisarbetet, samt att tullens och polisens resurser ökar för att komma åt handelns pengar. Det talar för motförslagets krav på ett fortsatt mål om ett narkotikafritt samhälle utan legalisering. Samtidigt betonar planen vård och respektfullt bemötande av personer i missbruk, vilket drar åt motsatt håll och sänker säkerheten.
- effective work against narcoticsdecisive»mot narkotika i alla led, från det förebyggande till polisarbetet.« (party programme ↗)“against narcotics at all levels, from prevention to police work.”
- choke off narcotics trade money»Tullens och polisens resurser måste öka för att komma åt de pengar som driver narkotikahandeln.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Customs and police resources must increase to address the money driving the narcotics trade.”
- restrictive ATOD regulation»Vi vill se en restriktiv reglering av alkohol och tobak.« (party programme ↗)“We want to see restrictive regulation of alcohol and tobacco.”
- care for people in substance abuse»Människor som fastnat i missbruk ska ha tillgång till den vård« (party programme ↗)“People who have fallen into substance abuse should have access to the care”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto establishes strong action against drug trafficking and the party programme strongly combats organized criminal activity, which is fed by drug use.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto establishes strong action against drug trafficking and the party programme strongly combats organized criminal activity, which is fed by drug use. A firmly held goal of a society free from drugs and a no to legalization is in line with the restrictive line. The plan's requirement for offensive measures against recruitment of young people points in the same direction, although the plan also emphasizes evidence in criminal policy.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet slår fast krafttag mot införsel av narkotika och partiprogrammet kraftfullt bekämpande av organiserad kriminell verksamhet, som göds av narkotikaanvändningen. Ett fasthållet mål om ett samhälle fritt från narkotika och ett nej till legalisering ligger i linje med den restriktiva linjen. Planens krav på offensiva insatser mot nyrekrytering av unga pekar åt samma håll, även om planen också betonar evidens i kriminalpolitiken.
- strong action against drugsdecisive»Vi vill ta krafttag mot införsel av vapen och narkotika, bland annat genom stärkt gränskontroll.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to take strong action against trafficking in weapons and drugs, including through strengthened border control.”
- combat organized crime»Kraftfullt bekämpande av organiserad kriminell verksamhet.« (party programme ↗)“Strong combating of organized criminal activity.”
- halt recruitment of young people»Offensiva insatser mot nyrekrytering och utnyttjande av barn och unga.« (party programme ↗)“Offensive measures against recruitment and exploitation of children and young people.”
- evidence-based criminal policy»Kriminalpolitik byggd på evidens, effektivitet och rättssäkerhet.« (party programme ↗)“Criminal policy built on evidence, efficiency and due process.”
The plan's drug policy is built on harm reduction, science and accessible care with a focus on reducing harm and saving lives.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's drug policy is built on harm reduction, science and accessible care with a focus on reducing harm and saving lives. The counter-proposal instead requires that the goal of a drug-free society be locked in and that decriminalisation be rejected, which goes against the plan's direction of not meeting addiction with repression. The plan therefore does not support what the counter-proposal requires.
Original (Swedish)
Planens narkotikapolitik bygger på skademinimering, vetenskap och tillgänglig vård med fokus på att minska skador och rädda liv. Motförslaget kräver i stället att målet om ett narkotikafritt samhälle låses fast och att avkriminalisering avvisas, vilket går emot planens inriktning på att inte möta beroende med repression. Planen ger därför inte stöd åt det motförslaget kräver.
- harm reduction as foundationdecisive»En effektiv narkotikapolitik måste kombinera förebyggande arbete med skademinimering« (party programme ↗)“An effective drug policy must combine preventative work with harm reduction”
- save lives before repression»fokus ligger på att minska skador, rädda liv och stärka vägen till återhämtning.« (party programme ↗)“the focus is on reducing harm, saving lives and strengthening the path to recovery.”
- evidence-based care»beroendevård som bygger på vetenskap och beprövad erfarenhet« (party programme ↗)“addiction care that is based on science and proven experience”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The documents say nothing about the goals of drug policy or about decriminalization.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The documents say nothing about the goals of drug policy or about decriminalization. The nearest-lying principle is the liberal harm model — freedom is limited only by consideration for others' equal rights — together with the party programme's view of addiction as a matter of influence, support and rehabilitation rather than locking in a zero-tolerance goal. Based on this, the plan does not support the counter-proposal's demand to lock in the goal and exclude decriminalization.
Original (Swedish)
Dokumenten säger ingenting om målen för narkotikapolitiken eller om avkriminalisering. Närmast liggande princip är den frihetliga skademodellen — friheten begränsas bara av hänsyn till andras lika rätt — tillsammans med partiprogrammets syn på missbruk som en fråga om inflytande, stöd och rehabilitering snarare än om att låsa fast ett nolltoleransmål. Utifrån detta ger planen inte stöd åt motförslagets krav på att låsa målet och utesluta avkriminalisering.
- freedom's harm modeldecisive»En människas frihet kan i grunden endast begränsas av hänsyn till andra människors lika rätt till frihet.« (party programme ↗)“A person's freedom can fundamentally only be limited by consideration for other people's equal right to freedom.”
- support and influence in addiction»psykisk ohälsa eller missbruksproblem måste ha inflytande över sitt liv och få det stöd som behövs« (party programme ↗)“mental ill-health or addiction problems must have influence over their life and get the support needed”
- rehabilitative criminal policy»Kriminalpolitiken ska därför både förebygga och avskräcka från brott, stödja brottsdrabbade och stimulera dem som har begått olagliga handlingar till en ny livssituation utan brottslighet.« (party programme ↗)“Criminal policy should therefore both prevent and deter crime, support crime victims and stimulate those who have committed illegal acts to a new life situation without criminality.”
The party programme establishes that zero tolerance shall apply to drugs in all levels of handling and that use shall be criminalised to deter drug debut.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme establishes that zero tolerance shall apply to drugs in all levels of handling and that use shall be criminalised to deter drug debut. That is precisely what the counter-proposal requires when it opposes legalisation and decriminalisation and wants to maintain the goal of a drug-free society. The plan simultaneously wants drug policy examined in its entirety, which does not change the substantive position.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår fast att nolltolerans ska råda mot narkotika i alla led av hanteringen och att användning ska vara kriminaliserad för att avhålla från narkotikadebut. Det är precis vad motförslaget kräver när det motsätter sig legalisering och avkriminalisering och vill hålla fast vid målet om ett narkotikafritt samhälle. Planen vill samtidigt att narkotikapolitiken utreds i sin helhet, vilket inte ändrar hållningen i sak.
- criminalised own usedecisive»Nolltolerans ska råda mot narkotika i alla led av hanteringen. För att avhålla från narkotikadebut ska användning vara kriminaliserad.« (party programme ↗)“Zero tolerance shall apply to drugs in all levels of handling. For deterring drug debut, use shall be criminalised.”
- zero tolerance toward drugs»En effektiv brottsbekämpning hänger därför ihop med en restriktiv alkoholpolitik och nolltolerans mot narkotika.« (party programme ↗)“Effective crime fighting is thus linked to a restrictive alcohol policy and zero tolerance against drugs.”
- zero vision against drug harm»Det övergripande målet ska vara en nollvision mot drogrelaterat lidande och drogrelaterade dödsfall.« (party programme ↗)“The overarching goal shall be a zero vision against drug-related suffering and drug-related deaths.”
- examine drug policy»Mot bakgrund av Sveriges höga narkotikadödlighet och problem med gängbrottslighet vill Liberalerna dock att den svenska narkotikapolitiken utreds i sin helhet.« (party programme ↗)“Given Sweden's high drug fatality rate and problems with gang crime, the Liberals however want the Swedish drug policy examined in its entirety.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The party programme states that the goal of drug policy shall be a drug-free society and that all non-medical possession and use of drugs shall be prohibited.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme states that the goal of drug policy shall be a drug-free society and that all non-medical possession and use of drugs shall be prohibited. The counter-proposal's demand that the goal stands firm and that legalization or decriminalization is rejected is the exact same commitment. The plan furthermore emphasizes that drug-free environments shall be promoted and that abuse care shall aim for a drug-free lifestyle.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår fast att målet med narkotikapolitiken ska vara ett narkotikafritt samhälle och att allt ickemedicinskt innehav och bruk av narkotika ska vara förbjudet. Motförslagets krav på att målet ligger fast och att legalisering eller avkriminalisering avvisas är ordagrant samma åtagande. Planen understryker dessutom att drogfria miljöer ska främjas och att missbruksvården ska syfta till en drogfri livsstil.
- drug-free societydecisive»Målet med narkotikapolitiken ska vara ett narkotikafritt samhälle.« (party programme ↗)“The goal of drug policy shall be a drug-free society.”
- prohibition on all non-medical use»Allt ickemedicinskt innehav och bruk av narkotika ska vara förbjudet.« (party programme ↗)“All non-medical possession and use of drugs shall be prohibited.”
- drug-free environments promoted»Insatser ska göras för att motverka ungas alkoholkonsumtion och drogfria miljöer ska främjas.« (party programme ↗)“Efforts shall be made to counteract young people's alcohol consumption and drug-free environments shall be promoted.”
- care towards drug-free life»Missbruks och beroendevård ska inriktas på att bryta beroendet och ge förutsättningar för en ny drogfri livsstil.« (party programme ↗)“Abuse and addiction care shall be directed at breaking the addiction and providing conditions for a new drug-free lifestyle.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan's drugs policy commitments are consistently restrictive: specialised narcotics police should be re-established, the customs service strengthened with powerful powers and drug treatment expanded within a large crime prevention package.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's drugs policy commitments are consistently restrictive: specialised narcotics police should be re-established, the customs service strengthened with powerful powers and drug treatment expanded within a large crime prevention package. A maintained goal of a society free from drugs and a rejection of legalisation or decriminalisation follows from that line. The plan does not mention the goal formulation as such, but its substance points unequivocally in the same direction.
Original (Swedish)
Planens narkotikapolitiska åtaganden är genomgående restriktiva: de specialiserade narkotikapoliserna ska återinföras, tullen stärkas med kraftfulla befogenheter och missbruksvården byggas ut inom ett stort brottsförebyggande paket. Ett fasthållet mål om ett samhälle fritt från narkotika och ett avvisande av legalisering eller avkriminalisering följer av den linjen. Planen nämner inte målformuleringen som sådan, men dess sakinnehåll pekar entydigt åt samma håll.
- restrictive drugs policydecisive»Återinföra de specialiserade narkotikapoliserna« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Re-establish the specialist narcotics police”
- stop smuggling»Stärka tullen med mer resurser och kraftfulla befogenheter för att stoppa stöldligor och vapensmugglare« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen the customs service with more resources and powerful powers to stop theft rings and weapons smugglers”
- strengthened drug treatment»Det handlar om över 50 reformer för att stärka socialtjänst, skola och missbruksvård.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It concerns over 50 reforms to strengthen social services, schools and drug treatment.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan's overarching criminal policy commitment is to shift policy to zero tolerance and incapacitation, so that even less serious crimes are investigated and prosecuted.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's overarching criminal policy commitment is to shift policy to zero tolerance and incapacitation, so that even less serious crimes are investigated and prosecuted. It particularly points out drug sales on school grounds as a result of leniency and demands action against crime affecting young people. A firm commitment to a drug-free society and a no to legalization or decriminalization follows directly from this line.
Original (Swedish)
Planens bärande kriminalpolitiska åtagande är att lägga om politiken till nolltolerans och inkapacitering, så att även mindre allvarliga brott utreds och lagförs. Den pekar särskilt ut drogförsäljning på skolgårdar som ett resultat av eftergivenhet och kräver krafttag mot brottslighet som drabbar unga. Ett fasthållet mål om ett narkotikafritt samhälle och ett nej till legalisering eller avkriminalisering följer direkt av denna linje.
- zero tolerance as criminal policy foundationdecisive»Sveriges kriminalpolitik behöver helt läggas om för att bygga på nolltolerans och inkapacitering.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden's criminal policy needs to be completely reorganized to build on zero tolerance and incapacitation.”
- zero tolerance against crime»Införa nolltolerans mot brott så att även mindre allvarliga brott utreds och lagförs« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Introduce zero tolerance against crime so that even less serious crimes are investigated and prosecuted”
- drugs affect young people»Knivattacker och drogförsäljning sker på skolgårdarna.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Knife attacks and drug sales happen on school grounds.”
- action against youth crime»Krafttag mot den brottslighet som drabbar unga« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Take action against crime affecting young people”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:SoU13)
- Committee report full text (HD01SoU13)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:1129 — Minskat regelkrångel vid gårdsförsäljning av Anders Karlsson (C)
- Motion 2025/26:1250 — Åtgärder för att motverka ungas droganvändning - fokus på glädje, stöd och uthålliga insatser av Denis Begic (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1544 — Gårdsförsäljning av Niels Paarup-Petersen m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2025/26:1566 — Reform av matkravet i alkohollagstiftningen av Heléne Björklund och Anna-Caren Sätherberg (båda S)
- Motion 2025/26:165 — Sänkning av åldersgränsen för inköp av alkoholhaltiga drycker till 18 år av Eric Palmqvist och Ann-Christine Frohm (båda SD)
- Motion 2025/26:1676 — Ett alkoholtillstånd för cateringverksamhet i hela landet av Charlotte Nordström (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1758 — Avskaffande av Systembolagets opinionsbildande uppdrag av Marie Nicholson (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1955 — Bildregeln i alkohollagen av Marie Nicholson m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2057 — Slopat krav på matservering i samband med alkoholservering av Anne-Li Sjölund (C)
- Motion 2025/26:2123 — Utskänkningstillstånd i fler kommuner än en av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2212 — Utbildningstillstånd giltigt i hela landet av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2025/26:224 — Förbud mot tillverkning och försäljning av röktobak i Sverige av Björn Tidland (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:2383 — Liberaliserad lagstiftning kring gårdsförsäljning av Markus Wiechel (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:2473 — Gårdsförsäljning av alkoholdrycker av Ann-Charlotte Hammar Johnsson m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2570 — Rimliga regler för alkoholservering av Oliver Rosengren m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2588 — Ägardirektiv till Systembolaget AB för att fortsatt erbjuda plastpåsar vid försäljning i fysisk butik av Mattias Eriksson Falk och Roger Hedlund (båda SD)
- Motion 2025/26:2633 — Gränsöverskridande alkoholtillstånd av Martina Johansson och Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist (båda C)
- Motion 2025/26:2636 — Levande städer av Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist och Niels Paarup-Petersen (båda C)
- Motion 2025/26:2741 — Barns rätt till frihet från reklam på sociala medier av Jytte Guteland (S)
- Motion 2025/26:2742 — Utredning om hälsovarningar på alkoholprodukter av Jytte Guteland och Kadir Kasirga (båda S)
Source: The Swedish Parliament