Risk of unserious actors

The election manifesto states that privatization of welfare opens the door for criminals to profit from public funds, and the party programme wants effective oversight of organized economic crime and measures against disreputable companies. Placing activities with private providers without special safeguards is precisely the risk the plan points out. Therefore, the plan supports the counter-proposal's demand for measures against disreputable actors.

• privatization opens the door for crimedecisive»Privatiseringarna av välfärden öppnar upp för kriminella att sko sig på skattemedel.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Privatizations of welfare open the door for criminals to profit from public funds.”
• against organized economic crime»Det behövs en effektiv uppföljning av den organiserade« (party programme ↗)“Effective oversight of organized”
• address disreputable companies»Vi vill också stärka arbetsrätten och ta itu med oseriösa« (party programme ↗)“We also want to strengthen labour law and address disreputable”
• economic crime has serious consequences»Ekonomisk brottslighet i företag leder till allvarliga konsekvenser,« (party programme ↗)“Economic crime in business leads to serious consequences,”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

The plan establishes that welfare crime shall be halted and requires strong action against workplace criminality, where public procurers shall be the model for fair competition. Ensuring that workplace-based activities cannot be exploited by unserious actors or organized crime is precisely that commitment. The plan also wants to abolish systems that lead to leakage of public funds.

• halted welfare crimedecisive»Skattefusk, välfärdsbrottslighet och penningtvätt ska stoppas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Tax fraud, welfare crime and money laundering shall be halted.”
• strong action against workplace criminality»Krafttag mot arbetslivskriminaliteten. Arbetslivs kriminalitet ska inte finnas på svensk arbetsmarknad och offentliga arbetsgivare och upphandlare ska vara föredömen i att verka för en sund konkurrens.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strong action against workplace criminality. Workplace criminality shall not exist on the Swedish labour market and public employers and procurers shall be the model in working for fair competition.”
• combated labour market criminality»Bekämpande av kriminalitet på arbetsmarknaden.« (party programme ↗)“Combating criminality on the labour market.”
• halt to leakage of public funds»Avskaffande av system som leder till bristande kontroll, läckage av skattemedel,« (party programme ↗)“Abolition of systems that lead to lack of control, leakage of public funds,”

flags: citat_migrerat

The plan wants to strengthen efforts against the criminal economy and for the authorities to be able to strike at organised crime's businesses from multiple directions, so that it becomes expensive and difficult to be criminal. That publicly funded activities can be exploited by disreputable actors is precisely such a financing channel. The counter-proposal's requirement for measures that exclude organised crime is thus in line with the plan.

• cut off criminal economydecisive»Vi vill också stärka arbetet mot den kriminella ekonomin.« (party programme ↗)“We also want to strengthen efforts against the criminal economy.”
• authority cooperation against gangs»stärka myndighetssamverkan så att myndigheterna kan slå till mot den organiserade brottslighetens företag från flera håll« (2022 manifesto ↗)“strengthen cooperation between authorities so that the authorities can strike at organised crime's businesses from multiple directions”
• unprofitable crime»Det ska vara dyrt, jobbigt och svårt att vara kriminell.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It shall be expensive, difficult and hard to be criminal.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

The plan demands crackdowns on gangs and wants to investigate how their income can be choked off, as well as crackdowns on crimes against businesses. Excluding organized crime from publicly financed activities follows directly from that commitment and furthermore protects fair competition. The plan does not mention the activity requirement specifically, so the conclusion is derived.

• choke off gang incomedecisive»Samhället ska inte vika sig för gängen. För att besegra dem krävs bättre insatser som förebygger nyrekrytering, mer resurser till polis, åklagare, domstolar och kriminalvården och strängare straff. Dessutom bör en utredning om gängens inkomster och hur dessa kan strypas genomföras.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Society shall not cave in to gangs. To defeat them requires better measures that prevent re-recruitment, more resources for police, prosecutors, courts and the penal system and stricter sentences. Furthermore, an investigation should be conducted into gang income and how it can be choked off.”
• crackdown on crimes against businesses»krafttag mot brott emot företag« (2022 manifesto ↗)“crackdown on crimes against businesses”
• fair competition»Konkurrens är en viktig drivkraft för utvecklingen av marknadsekonomin.« (party programme ↗)“Competition is an important driving force for the development of the market economy.”
• public funds shall be used correctly»Politiken ska hushålla med skattebetalarnas pengar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Policy shall be a good steward of taxpayers' money.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

The plan establishes that no tax funds shall go to operations that work against fundamental democratic values and wants to strengthen the follow-up of grant-giving. It also requires that providers with serious shortcomings shall not be allowed to run operations. The counter-proposal's requirement to lock out organised crime from workplace-based activities follows from these commitments.

• no tax funds to criminalsdecisive»Inga skattemedel ska gå till verksamheter som vill förändra det demokratiska samhället med våld eller på annat sätt motarbetar grundläggande demokratiska värderingar.« (party programme ↗)“No tax funds shall go to operations that want to change the democratic society by violence or otherwise work against fundamental democratic values.”
• strengthened follow-up of grants»Vi vill både stärka uppföljningen av bidragsgivning och stoppa dold finansiering av trossamfund så att de inte blir verktyg för extremistiska krafter.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want both to strengthen the follow-up of grant-giving and stop covert financing of religious communities so they do not become tools for extremist forces.”
• disreputable providers shut out»Den utförare som håller otillräcklig kvalitet eller gör sig skyldig till allvarliga brister ska inte ha tillstånd att bedriva verksamhet.« (party programme ↗)“The provider that maintains insufficient quality or is guilty of serious shortcomings shall not be permitted to run operations.”
• sound procurement»Offentlig upphandling ska ske på sätt som ger skattebetalarna låga kostnader, hög kvalitet, säkrar likabehandling och stimulerar konkurrens.« (party programme ↗)“Public procurement shall be done in ways that give taxpayers low costs, high quality, secures equal treatment and stimulates competition.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

The party programme gives the state the role of overseeing that legislation and good ethics are maintained on the market and requires that all crimes be effectively prosecuted. That organized crime would be able to earn money on workplace-based activities is against this. The counter-proposal's demand to exclude such actors thereby lies in line with the plan, which also wants authorities to be able to share information to prevent crime.

• the state oversees good ethicsdecisive»Statens roll i näringspolitiken är att övervaka att lagstiftningen och en god etik upprätthålls på marknaden.« (party programme ↗)“The state's role in business policy is to oversee that legislation and good ethics are maintained on the market.”
• all crime shall be prosecuted»Alla brott ska effektivt och utan undantag beivras, också sådana som kan avfärdas som smärre brott och förseelser.« (party programme ↗)“All crime shall be effectively and without exception prosecuted, also such as may be dismissed as minor crime and offences.”
• oppose unfair competition»En effektiv konkurrenspolitik motverkar oligopol, monopol och illojal konkurrens.« (party programme ↗)“An effective competition policy opposes oligopolies, monopolies and unfair competition.”
• authority cooperation against crime»Total översyn av sekretessreglerna, så att myndigheter kan dela uppgifter mellan sig för att förebygga och klara upp brott.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“A complete review of secrecy regulations, so that authorities can share information with each other to prevent and clear up crime.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

The plan establishes that tax money should go to welfare and not end up in the pockets of criminals, and wants to both stop payments of tax money to extremists and introduce a benefits stop for gang criminals. The counter-proposal's demand that organised crime be shut out from workplace-based activities follows directly from that line. The plan also points out that around 20 billion kronor each year disappears to fraudsters and criminals.

• tax money not to criminalsdecisive»Där dina skattepengar används till fler lärare och poliser i stället för att hamna i fickorna på kriminella.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Where your tax money is used for more teachers and police instead of ending up in criminals' pockets.”
• stop tax money to disreputable»Stoppa utbetalningar av skattemedel till extremister« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Stop payments of tax money to extremists”
• extensive welfare crime(2022 manifesto)
• exclude criminals from benefits»Införa ett bidragsstopp för gängkriminella och göra det enklare att vräka dem« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Introduce a benefits stop for gang criminals and make it easier to evict them”

flags: citat_ej_verifierat

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

The plan requires that welfare crime be stopped, that fraud and systems that invite fraud and corruption be counteracted, and that the power of clans and organized crime within the public sector be combated. The counter-proposal's demands to exclude actors connected to organized crime from workplace-based activities follow directly from these commitments. The plan does not address this specific reform, so the position is derived.

• stop welfare crimedecisive»Stoppa välfärdsbrottsligheten inom socialförsäkringen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Stop welfare crime within social insurance”
• counteract fraud and corruption»Både fusk och sådana system som tenderar att locka till fusk och korruption ska motverkas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Both fraud and systems that tend to invite fraud and corruption should be counteracted.”
• against organized crime»Motverka klanernas makt, både inom det offentliga och inom civilsamhället« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Counteract clans' power, both within the public sector and within civil society”
• toughened penalties for fraud»Skärpa straffen för fusk inom välfärdssystemen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Tighten penalties for fraud within welfare systems”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.