2026-02-042025/26:MJU8 · p.2MJUEnvironment & agriculture

Agriculture's competitiveness

The competitiveness of Swedish agriculture

What's at stake: The decision affects farmers producing lamb and beef on semi-natural grazing land, which contributes to biodiversity and open landscapes but whose profitability is uncertain. It concerns whether that sector gets dedicated national support or continues to rely on existing, broader support schemes.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is whether the state should set up a dedicated national programme to strengthen lamb and beef production on semi-natural grazing land, or whether existing support under the strategic plan and food strategy is enough to strengthen competitiveness across the food chain.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee points out that the strategic plan already includes support for semi-natural grazing land and the lamb industry, that authorities are working on a project to promote such grazing land, and that national support is available for restoring pastureland. With reference to this, and to the updated food strategy's three focus areas, the committee rejects the motions calling for a dedicated national programme.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 4 (S)

The reservation (S) highlights the value of semi-natural grazing land for biodiversity, open landscapes and carbon storage, along with the quality, food-security role and rural employment linked to grazing-based meat, and calls for a national programme to strengthen the profitability and competitiveness of sustainable lamb and beef production on such land.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 4 by S.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
VNoYes 19/0/0/3departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
Sown reservationNoNo 0/91/0/15follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
MPNoYes 12/0/0/6departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived
CNoAbstain 0/0/21/3departs from the planconfidence: highderived
LNoYes 14/0/0/2departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
KDYesYes 14/0/0/5follows the planconfidence: lownot addressed
MYesYes 58/0/0/10follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
SDNoYes 62/0/0/9departs from the planconfidence: highderived

Committee proposal

The Parliament rejects the motions 2025/26:983 by Helena Lindahl (C) demand 2, 2025/26:2833 by Helena Lindahl et al. (C) demands 15 and 17 and 2025/26:3733 by Åsa Westlund et al. (S) demands 11 and 23.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2025/26:983 av Helena Lindahl (C) yrkande 2, 2025/26:2833 av Helena Lindahl m.fl. (C) yrkandena 15 och 17 samt 2025/26:3733 av Åsa Westlund m.fl. (S) yrkandena 11 och 23.

Riksdag decision: The Parliament voted no on approximately 120 proposals in motions on agricultural policy. The motions were submitted during the general motioning period 2025 and concern, among other things, the common agricultural policy, sustainable and competitive agriculture and agriculture's climate and environmental impact. The Parliament primarily refers to the fact that work is already underway in the areas covered by the proposals.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan wants to see investments in sustainable food production and comprehensive work for rich ecosystems, of which the biological diversity of pasture land is a part, while the state has particular responsibility for food self-sufficiency.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants to see investments in sustainable food production and comprehensive work for rich ecosystems, of which the biological diversity of pasture land is a part, while the state has particular responsibility for food self-sufficiency. A programme that strengthens profitability in pasture-based production in rural areas also aligns closely with the plan's requirement that natural resource values stay in the countryside. At the same time, the plan wants to see a shift toward more sustainable eating habits, which makes the support conditional.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill se satsningar på hållbar livsmedelsproduktion och ett heltäckande arbete för rika ekosystem, vilket naturbetesmarkernas biologiska mångfald är en del av, samtidigt som staten har ett särskilt ansvar för självförsörjningen med livsmedel. Ett program som stärker lönsamheten i betesbaserad produktion i glesbygd ligger också nära planens krav på att naturresursernas värden ska stanna på landsbygden. Samtidigt vill planen se ett skifte mot mer hållbara matvanor, vilket gör stödet villkorat.

  • sustainable food productiondecisive»En annan viktig del i den gröna omställningen är satsningar på hållbar livsmedelsproduktion.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Another important part of the green transition is investments in sustainable food production.”
  • food self-sufficiency»Staten har ett särskilt ansvar att se till« (party programme ↗)“The state has particular responsibility to ensure”
  • rich ecosystems»Sverige behöver också ett medvetet och heltäckande arbete med att« (party programme ↗)“Sweden also needs deliberate and comprehensive work to”
  • value stays in the countryside»Mer av naturresursernas värden måste stanna kvar där de utvinns och produceras.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“More of the value of natural resources must stay where they are extracted and produced.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

SSocialdemokraternaNoNofollows the plannot addressed

The plan requires a thriving Swedish food production that strengthens self-sufficiency and a rural policy for prosperity throughout the country, at the same time that biological diversity should be protected.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan requires a thriving Swedish food production that strengthens self-sufficiency and a rural policy for prosperity throughout the country, at the same time that biological diversity should be protected. A programme that strengthens profitability in pasture-based lamb and beef production on natural pastures combines precisely these goals. However, the plan does not particularly mention natural pastures.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver en livskraftig svensk livsmedelsproduktion som stärker självförsörjningen och en landsbygdspolitik för välstånd i hela landet, samtidigt som den biologiska mångfalden ska värnas. Ett program som stärker lönsamheten i betesbaserad lamm- och nötköttsproduktion på naturbetesmarker förenar just dessa mål. Planen nämner dock inte naturbetesmarker särskilt.

  • strengthened self-sufficiencydecisive»Livskraftig svensk livsmedelsproduktion som stärker landets självförsörjningsförmåga.« (party programme ↗)“Thriving Swedish food production that strengthens the country's self-sufficiency.”
  • protected biological diversity»Värn av biologisk mångfald och Sveriges värdefulla natur och vattenmiljöer.« (party programme ↗)“Protection of biological diversity and Sweden's valuable nature and water environments.”
  • vibrant rural areas»Landsbygdspolitik för utveckling och välstånd i hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“Rural policy for development and prosperity throughout the country.”
  • sustainable resource use»Hållbar utvinning och användning av naturresurser, med ekonomisk kompensation till« (party programme ↗)“Sustainable extraction and use of natural resources, with economic compensation to”
MPMiljöpartietNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan wants to provide more support to agriculture for restoring natural grazing meadows and other environmental measures, and is built on a landscape with grazing animals that keep the natural grazing meadows open and create habitats for a large diversity.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants to provide more support to agriculture for restoring natural grazing meadows and other environmental measures, and is built on a landscape with grazing animals that keep the natural grazing meadows open and create habitats for a large diversity. A specific programme for profitability in grazing-based lamb and beef production serves precisely that purpose. The plan simultaneously wants consumption of animal food products to decrease, which limits but does not eliminate the support.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill ge mer stöd till lantbruket för återskapande av naturbetesmarker och andra miljöinsatser, och bygger på ett landskap med betesdjur som håller naturbetesmarkerna öppna och skapar livsmiljöer för en stor mångfald. Ett särskilt program för lönsamhet i betesbaserad lamm- och nötköttsproduktion tjänar just det syftet. Planen vill samtidigt att konsumtionen av animaliska livsmedel minskar, vilket begränsar men inte upphäver stödet.

  • support for natural grazing meadowsdecisive»ge mer stöd till lantbruket för omställning till ekologisk odling, återskapande av naturbetesmarker och andra miljöinsatser.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“provide more support to agriculture for switching to organic cultivation, restoring natural grazing meadows and other environmental measures.”
  • grazing animals for biological diversity»Med ett landskap rikt på småbiotoper och betesdjur som ger gödsel, håller naturbetesmarkerna öppna och skapar livsmiljöer för en stor mångfald av växter, djur och svampar.« (party programme ↗)“With a landscape rich in small biotopes and grazing animals that provide manure, keep the natural grazing meadows open and create habitats for a large diversity of plants, animals and fungi.”
  • promote small-scale sustainable farming»Små och medelstora lantbruk som bygger på lokala kretslopp, hållbara och ekologiska brukningsmetoder och en god djurhållning ska främjas.« (party programme ↗)“Small and medium-sized farms based on local cycles, sustainable and organic farming methods and good animal husbandry shall be promoted.”
  • reduced meat consumption»Konsumtionen av animaliska livsmedel behöver minska, medan konsumtionen av vegetabilier bör öka.« (party programme ↗)“Consumption of animal food products needs to decrease, while consumption of vegetables should increase.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

CCenterpartietNoAbstaindeparts from the planderived

The election manifesto wants to strengthen the competitiveness of the green industries and requires an even more competitive agriculture with increased food production, while nature conservation and biological diversity shall be developed.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto wants to strengthen the competitiveness of the green industries and requires an even more competitive agriculture with increased food production, while nature conservation and biological diversity shall be developed. The party programme emphasizes that Swedish animal husbandry contributes to an open landscape. A special programme for profitability in sheep and beef production on semi-natural pastures unites precisely these commitments.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet vill stärka de gröna näringarnas konkurrenskraft och kräver ett ännu mer konkurrenskraftigt jordbruk med ökad matproduktion, samtidigt som naturvården och den biologiska mångfalden ska utvecklas. Partiprogrammet framhåller att svensk djuruppfödning bidrar till ett öppet landskap. Ett särskilt program för lönsamhet i lamm- och nötköttsproduktion på naturbetesmarker förenar just dessa åtaganden.

  • strengthened competitiveness of green industriesdecisive»Vi ska arbeta för mer närodlad och klimatsmart mat och ett levande, hållbart jordbruk som bidrar till den biologiska mångfalden. Vi vill stärka de gröna näringarnas konkurrenskraft.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We shall work for more locally grown and climate-smart food and a living, sustainable agriculture that contributes to biological diversity. We want to strengthen the competitiveness of the green industries.”
  • competitive agriculture»Sverige behöver ett ännu mer konkurrenskraftigt jordbruk.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden needs an even more competitive agriculture.”
  • animal husbandry for open landscapes»Svensk djuruppfödning bidrar också till ett öppet landskap och möjliggör produktion av biogas.« (party programme ↗)“Swedish animal husbandry also contributes to an open landscape and enables biogas production.”
  • increased food production and preparedness»Matproduktionen måste öka, på kort och lång sikt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Food production must increase, in the short and long term.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

LLiberalernaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan wants agriculture to be compensated for collective benefits such as nature management and preserved biological diversity, and for direct support to be phased out in favour of investments in landscape management and environmental protection.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants agriculture to be compensated for collective benefits such as nature management and preserved biological diversity, and for direct support to be phased out in favour of investments in landscape management and environmental protection. Natural pastures are precisely such a collective benefit, and a programme that strengthens profitability in grazing on these pastures therefore lies in line with the plan. The plan says nothing about precisely a special lamb and beef programme.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill att jordbruket ersätts för kollektiva nyttigheter som naturvård och bevarad biologisk mångfald, och att direktstöden fasas ut till förmån för satsningar på landskapsvård och miljöskydd. Naturbetesmarkerna är just en sådan kollektiv nyttighet, och ett program som stärker lönsamheten i bete på dessa marker ligger därför i linje med planen. Planen säger dock inget om just ett särskilt lamm- och nötköttsprogram.

  • compensation for collective benefitsdecisive»Jordbruket ska i likhet med andra sektorer bära sina egna miljö- och klimatkostnader, men också ersättas för kollektiva nyttigheter som naturvård samt bevarande av den biologiska mångfalden.« (party programme ↗)“Agriculture shall, like other sectors, bear its own environmental and climate costs, but shall also be compensated for collective benefits such as nature management and preservation of biological diversity.”
  • investments in landscape management»Samtliga direktstöd och marknadsstörande regleringar ska fasas ut så snart som möjligt, och i stället behövs ökade satsningar på landskapsvård, miljöskydd och bevarad biologisk mångfald.« (party programme ↗)“All direct support and market-distorting regulations shall be phased out as soon as possible, and instead there is a need for increased investments in landscape management, environmental protection and preserved biological diversity.”
  • restoration of natural types»För att bevara och utveckla den biologiska mångfalden i form av olika naturtyper och arter behövs ökade restaureringsinsatser och fler skyddade sammanhängande områden både på land och i vatten.« (party programme ↗)“To preserve and develop biological diversity in the form of different natural types and species, there is a need for increased restoration efforts and more protected contiguous areas both on land and in water.”
  • protect biological diversity»Då behöver vi fortsätta arbetet med att skydda både värdefull natur och den biologiska mångfalden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Then we need to continue the work of protecting both valuable nature and biological diversity.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

KDKristdemokraternaYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The party programme rejects direct company subsidies and wants business policy to be conducted with general means, with targeted actions only as a complement to general stimulus measures.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The party programme rejects direct company subsidies and wants business policy to be conducted with general means, with targeted actions only as a complement to general stimulus measures. A special new programme for profitability in lamb and beef production on natural pasture land is exactly such a targeted sectoral investment. The election manifesto's recipe for agriculture is regulatory changes and cost reductions, not new support programmes. The demand is rejected, even though the plan values biological diversity in the agricultural landscape.

Original (Swedish)

Partiprogrammet avvisar direkta företagssubventioner och vill att näringspolitiken bedrivs med generella medel, med riktade insatser först som komplement till generella stimulansåtgärder. Ett särskilt nytt program för lönsamheten i lamm- och nötköttsproduktion på naturbetesmarker är just en sådan riktad sektorsatsning. Valmanifestets recept för lantbruket är regeländringar och kostnadslättnader, inte nya stödprogram. Kravet avvisas, även om planen värnar biologisk mångfald i jordbrukslandskapet.

  • no to direct company subsidiesdecisive»Direkta företagssubventioner avvisas.« (party programme ↗)“Direct company subsidies are rejected.”
  • general business policy means»Näringspolitiken ska bedrivas med generella medel, det vill säga syfta till att skapa goda förutsättningar för företagande över hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“Business policy shall be conducted with general means, i.e. aimed at creating favourable conditions for business across the whole country.”
  • regulatory reductions instead of new programmes»Regeländringar och kostnadslättnader för svenskt lantbruk för att öka Sveriges självförsörjning och stärka lantbrukets konkurrenskraft.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Regulatory changes and cost reductions for Swedish agriculture to increase Sweden's self-sufficiency and strengthen agriculture's competitiveness.”
  • general stimulus measures first»Regionalpolitiken ska medverka till att en god grund för näringslivet i sysselsättningssvaga områden skapas i första hand genom generella stimulansåtgärder.« (party programme ↗)“Regional policy shall contribute to creating a good foundation for business in employment-weak areas primarily through general stimulus measures.”
MModeraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan's stated line for agriculture is to support, not steer: better profitability should be achieved through lower taxes and reduced regulatory red tape, not through new targeted programmes.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan's stated line for agriculture is to support, not steer: better profitability should be achieved through lower taxes and reduced regulatory red tape, not through new targeted programmes. A special programme for lamb and beef production on nature meadows is precisely such selective steering that the plan rejects. That the plan also wants to strengthen the food strategy and increase domestic production does not change the method choice.

Original (Swedish)

Planens uttalade linje för jordbruket är att stötta, inte styra: bättre lönsamhet ska nås genom sänkta skatter och minskat regelkrångel, inte genom nya riktade program. Ett särskilt program för lamm- och nötköttsproduktion på naturbetesmarker är just en sådan selektiv styrning som planen väljer bort. Att planen samtidigt vill förstärka livsmedelsstrategin och öka den inhemska produktionen ändrar inte metodvalet.

  • support not steer agriculturedecisive»Vi ska stötta, inte styra, jord- och skogsbruket« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We must support, not steer, agriculture and forestry”
  • lower taxes for agriculture»Moderaterna vill förbättra förutsättningarna att driva lantbruk genom att sänka skatterna« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Moderates want to improve the conditions for running agriculture by lowering taxes”
  • fewer rules for agriculture»Minska antalet regler för jordbruket och korta handläggningstider för miljötillstånd« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Reduce the number of rules for agriculture and shorten processing times for environmental permits”
  • strengthened food strategy»Förstärka livsmedelsstrategin« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen the food strategy”
SDSverigedemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan seeks to increase national funding in agriculture for environmental benefit and increased productivity and replace appropriately managed sensitive nature care instead of reserve designation.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan seeks to increase national funding in agriculture for environmental benefit and increased productivity and replace appropriately managed sensitive nature care instead of reserve designation. It also states that active agriculture is the prerequisite for biological diversity in the agricultural landscape and that encroachment must be prevented. A special programme for profitability in sheep and beef production on natural grasslands is precisely such a measure. Therefore, the plan supports the counter-proposal's demands.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill öka den nationella finansieringen i jordbruket för miljönytta och produktivitetsökning och ersätta anpassad skötsel av känslig natur i stället för reservatsavsättning. Den slår också fast att ett aktivt jordbruk är förutsättningen för jordbrukslandskapets biologiska mångfald och att igenväxning ska motverkas. Ett särskilt program för lönsamhet i lamm- och nötköttsproduktion på naturbetesmarker är just en sådan åtgärd. Därför stöder planen motförslagets krav.

  • increased national agricultural fundingdecisive»Öka den nationella finansieringen i jordbruket, för miljönytta och produktivitetsökning« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Increase national funding in agriculture, for environmental benefit and increased productivity”
  • compensation for nature-conserving management»ge ersättning för anpassad skötsel av känslig natur snarare än för reservatsbildning« (2022 manifesto ↗)“provide compensation for adapted management of sensitive nature rather than for reserve formation”
  • prevent encroachment»Att jordbruksmarken brukas och att igenväxning motverkas« (2022 manifesto ↗)“That agricultural land is cultivated and that encroachment is prevented”
  • increased food self-sufficiency»Öka det svenska jordbrukets konkurrenskraft och Sveriges självförsörjning av livsmedel« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Increase Swedish agriculture's competitiveness and Sweden's self-sufficiency in food”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament