2023-05-242022/23:TU10 · p.1TUTransport & infrastructure

A fossil-free vehicle fleet

Targets and pace for a fossil-free vehicle fleet

What's at stake: The decision affects the pace of the transition of road traffic away from fossil fuels, including how quickly charging infrastructure is built out in rural areas and for heavy traffic, which in turn affects both climate emissions and public health through reduced exhaust emissions.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is whether parliament should set a firm target year and stronger policy instruments - such as an expanded bonus-malus system and more charging infrastructure in rural areas - for the vehicle fleet to become fossil-free, or whether the ongoing build-out of charging infrastructure and access to renewable fuels within existing programmes and regulations should be considered sufficient.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee rejects the motions. The committee points, among other things, to the fact that there is already a statutory obligation to provide renewable fuels, that the EU regulatory framework (the AFID directive) is being tightened, that the relevant agencies have been tasked with drawing up a national action programme for charging and hydrogen infrastructure, and that a national hydrogen strategy has been presented. Against that background, the committee considers that no further parliamentary initiative is needed at this time.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 1 (S)

The reservation (S) wants to see a fossil-free vehicle fleet by 2030 at the latest and points to the bonus-malus system, which rewards vehicles with low carbon dioxide emissions and taxes vehicles with high emissions more heavily, as a tool that has increased sales of chargeable vehicles. The reservation wants to extend and expand investment in charging infrastructure in rural areas and support for regional electrification pilots for heavier traffic, also citing the health effects of nitrogen oxides from traffic.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by S.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
VNoAbstain 0/0/18/6departs from the planconfidence: highexplicit
Sown reservationNoNo 0/93/0/14follows the planconfidence: highexplicit
MPNoAbstain 0/0/13/5departs from the planconfidence: highexplicit
CNoAbstain 0/0/21/3departs from the planconfidence: highexplicit
LNoYes 11/0/0/5departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
KDYesYes 14/0/0/5follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
MNoYes 58/0/1/9departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
SDYesYes 63/0/0/9follows the planconfidence: highexplicit

Broke with the party line

MLars Engsund (M, Kalmar län)Abstain — party line: Yes

MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.

Committee proposal

The Riksdag rejects the motions 2022/23:853 by Ulrika Heie et al. (C) proposals 7.2, 33 in this part and 35, 2022/23:1233 by Nooshi Dadgostar et al. (V) proposals 5 and 17, 2022/23:2073 by Anna-Caren Sätherberg et al. (S) proposal 16, 2022/23:2140 by Gunilla Svantorp et al. (S) proposal 17, 2022/23:2175 by Per Bolund et al. (MP) proposal 37 and 2022/23:2190 by Annie Lööf et al. (C) proposal 76.2.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2022/23:853 av Ulrika Heie m.fl. (C) yrkandena 7.2, 33 i denna del och 35, 2022/23:1233 av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V) yrkandena 5 och 17, 2022/23:2073 av Anna-Caren Sätherberg m.fl. (S) yrkande 16, 2022/23:2140 av Gunilla Svantorp m.fl. (S) yrkande 17, 2022/23:2175 av Per Bolund m.fl. (MP) yrkande 37 och 2022/23:2190 av Annie Lööf m.fl. (C) yrkande 76.2.

Riksdag decision: The Riksdag said no to 104 proposals in motions from the general motion period 2022. The proposals concern, among other things, a fossil-free vehicle fleet, charging and fossil-free refueling, autonomous vehicles, heavier and longer trucks, parking issues, the vehicle register and vehicle ombudspersons.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoAbstaindeparts from the planexplicit

The election manifesto requires that the road network be electrified and complemented with infrastructure for other sustainable fuels to make passenger and freight transport sustainable, and that the transition happen immediately because it is proceeding far too slowly.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto requires that the road network be electrified and complemented with infrastructure for other sustainable fuels to make passenger and freight transport sustainable, and that the transition happen immediately because it is proceeding far too slowly. The counter-proposal's demands for a firmer timetable, bonus malus, and expanded charging infrastructure even in rural areas follow directly from that. The plan also points to the state as responsible for making infrastructure expansion faster.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet kräver att vägnätet elektrifieras och kompletteras med infrastruktur för andra hållbara drivmedel för att göra person- och godstransporter hållbara, och att omställningen sker omgående eftersom den går alldeles för sakta. Motförslagets krav på fastare tidsram, bonus malus och utbyggd laddinfrastruktur även i glesbygd följer direkt av det. Planen pekar också ut staten som ansvarig för att infrastrukturutbyggnaden går snabbare.

  • electrified road networkdecisive»För att göra såväl person- som godstransporter hållbara behöver vägnätet både elektrifieras och kompletteras med infrastruktur för andra hållbara drivmedel.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“To make both passenger and freight transport sustainable, the road network needs to be both electrified and complemented with infrastructure for other sustainable fuels.”
  • transition on a firm timetable»Omställningen behöver ske omgående och alla politiska beslut behöver ta hänsyn till den akuta kris som vi befinner oss i.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The transition needs to happen immediately and all political decisions need to take into account the acute crisis we are facing.”
  • state responsibility in rural areas»Utbyggnaden av transportinfrastruktur och fiber går alldeles för sakta, staten behöver gå in och ta ett större ansvar för utbyggnaden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Expansion of transport infrastructure and broadband is proceeding far too slowly; the state needs to take greater responsibility for this expansion.”
  • sharpened climate policy instruments»Investeringar i grön teknik, industri och infrastruktur, utbyggd energikapacitet och stärkt styrning utifrån nya, skärpta klimatmål behövs.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Investments in green technology, industry and infrastructure, expanded energy capacity and strengthened governance based on new, sharpened climate targets are needed.”

The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.

SSocialdemokraternaNoNofollows the planexplicit

The plan commits to doubling the number of charging points by 2030 and increasing the production of renewable fuels, within a fixed climate policy framework and the goal of net zero emissions by 2045.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan commits to doubling the number of charging points by 2030 and increasing the production of renewable fuels, within a fixed climate policy framework and the goal of net zero emissions by 2045. The counter-proposal's demand for a firmer timeline for a fossil-free vehicle fleet, expanded charging infrastructure in rural areas, and support for electrification of heavy traffic is the same commitment. The plan therefore supports the demand.

Original (Swedish)

Planen åtar sig att dubbla antalet laddstolpar till 2030 och att öka produktionen av förnybara drivmedel, inom ett klimatpolitiskt ramverk som ligger fast och målet om inga nettoutsläpp 2045. Motförslagets krav på fastare tidsram för en fossilfri fordonsflotta, utbyggd laddinfrastruktur i glesbygd och stöd till elektrifiering av tyngre trafik är samma åtagande. Planen stöder därför kravet.

  • double charging infrastructuredecisive»Vi vill dubbla antalet laddstolpar till 2030 för att underlätta för den som har elbil.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to double the number of charging points by 2030 to make it easier for those with electric cars.”
  • net zero emissions 2045»År 2045 ska Sverige inte ha några nettoutsläpp av växthusgaser till atmosfären, för att därefter uppnå negativa utsläpp.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“By 2045, Sweden should have no net greenhouse gas emissions to the atmosphere, then to achieve negative emissions.”
  • more renewable fuels»Vi vill öka den svenska produktionen av förnybara drivmedel, så att det blir lättare att tanka fossilfritt i Sverige.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to increase Swedish production of renewable fuels, so that it becomes easier to refuel with fossil-free fuel in Sweden.”
  • the climate framework remains fixed»Det klimatpolitiska ramverket ska ligga fast.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The climate policy framework should remain fixed.”
MPMiljöpartietNoAbstaindeparts from the planexplicit

The election manifesto sets a fixed deadline for the vehicle fleet by stating that only fossil-free cars shall be sold from 2025 and wants the state to invest in charging throughout the country where the market does not reach, even for trucks.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto sets a fixed deadline for the vehicle fleet by stating that only fossil-free cars shall be sold from 2025 and wants the state to invest in charging throughout the country where the market does not reach, even for trucks. The party programme wants to use laws and economic instruments that make clean vehicles cheaper and dirty ones more expensive, which is the bonus malus logic. The plan thus supports the counter-proposal's requirement.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet sätter en fast tidsram för fordonsflottan genom att bara fossilfria bilar ska säljas från 2025 och vill att staten investerar i laddning i hela landet där marknaden inte räcker till, även för lastbilar. Partiprogrammet vill använda lagar och ekonomiska styrmedel som gör rena fordon billigare och smutsiga dyrare, vilket är bonus malus-logiken. Planen stöder därför motförslagets krav.

  • fossil-free vehicle fleet on timedecisive»att den som behöver bil ska ha råd med ett klimatsmart alternativ, och att bara fossilfria bilar ska säljas från 2025.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“that those who need a car shall have the means for a climate-smart alternative, and that only fossil-free cars shall be sold from 2025.”
  • charging infrastructure throughout the country»investera i laddning i hela landet — staten ska ta ansvar där marknaden inte räcker till, så att bilar och lastbilar kan köra på el oavsett vart i landet de ska.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“invest in charging throughout the country — the state shall take responsibility where the market does not reach, so that cars and trucks can run on electricity regardless of where in the country they are going.”
  • instruments for clean vehicles»Lagar och ekonomiska styrmedel ska användas för« (party programme ↗)“Laws and economic instruments shall be used for”

The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.

CCenterpartietNoAbstaindeparts from the planexplicit

The election manifesto requires that transport emissions be reduced and that there be more charging stations and rapid chargers across the country, which directly corresponds to the counter-proposal's investments in charging infrastructure in sparsely populated areas and electrification of heavier traffic.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto requires that transport emissions be reduced and that there be more charging stations and rapid chargers across the country, which directly corresponds to the counter-proposal's investments in charging infrastructure in sparsely populated areas and electrification of heavier traffic. The principle that polluting shall cost more lies behind a bonus malus system that rewards low emissions. The party programme's goal of a vehicle fleet driven only by renewable energy also gives support for a firmer time frame.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet kräver att transporternas utsläpp bort och att det ska finnas fler laddstolpar och snabbladdare i hela landet, vilket direkt motsvarar motförslagets satsningar på laddinfrastruktur i glesbygd och elektrifiering av tyngre trafik. Principen att det ska kosta mer att smutsa ner ligger bakom ett bonus malus-system som premierar låga utsläpp. Partiprogrammets mål om en fordonsflotta som endast drivs med förnybar energi ger också stöd för en fastare tidsram.

  • laddinfrastruktur i hela landetdecisive»bygga fler laddstolpar och snabbladdare i hela landet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“build more charging stations and rapid chargers across the country”
  • bort med transportutsläpp»Transporternas utsläpp ska bort och ny utsläppsfri infrastruktur ska komma på plats.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Transport emissions must be eliminated and new emission-free infrastructure must be put in place.”
  • förorenaren betalar»Det ska kosta mer att smutsa ner.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It shall cost more to pollute.”
  • fossilfri fordonsflotta»Att bryta oljeberoendet i transportsektorn och nå svenska klimatmål förutsätter att Sveriges fordonsflotta på sikt endast drivs med förnybar energi.« (party programme ↗)“Breaking oil dependency in the transport sector and reaching Swedish climate goals requires that Sweden's vehicle fleet in time be driven only by renewable energy.”

The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.

LLiberalernaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan wants fossil emissions from the transport sector gone, for more to choose electric vehicles and for charging stations to be built where we live, work and travel, and for electrification to be accelerated.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants fossil emissions from the transport sector gone, for more to choose electric vehicles and for charging stations to be built where we live, work and travel, and for electrification to be accelerated. This supports the counter-proposal's demands for a faster fossil-free vehicle fleet and expanded charging infrastructure, even in sparsely populated areas and for heavier traffic. The plan's objection to subsidy-driven policy instruments however makes support for precisely bonus malus weaker.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill att fossilutsläppen från transportsektorn bort, att fler väljer elbil och att laddstolpar byggs där vi bor, arbetar och reser, samt att elektrifieringen påskyndas. Det bär motförslagets krav på en snabbare fossilfri fordonsflotta och utbyggd laddinfrastruktur, även i glesbygd och för tyngre trafik. Planens invändning mot bidragsdrivna styrmedel gör dock stödet för just bonus malus svagare.

  • electrified transport and charging infrastructuredecisive»Fossilutsläppen från transportsektorn ska bort. Fler ska välja elbilen och en inblandning av fossilfria bränslen ska fortsätta. Det behövs laddstolpar där vi bor, arbetar och reser.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Fossil emissions from the transport sector must go. More shall choose the electric car and a blend of fossil-free fuels shall continue. Charging stations are needed where we live, work and travel.”
  • accelerated electrification»Elektrifieringen av transportsektorn ska påskyndas.« (party programme ↗)“Electrification of the transport sector shall be accelerated.”
  • transport bears its climate costs»Beroendet av fossila bränslen måste brytas och alla transportslag måste stå för sina klimatkostnader.« (party programme ↗)“Dependence on fossil fuels must be broken and all transport modes must account for their climate costs.”
  • policy instruments before subsidies»Därför är vi för riktiga klimatskatter i stället för att göra klimatpolitiken till en tävling i högst bidrag och flest symbolskatter.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Therefore we are for real climate taxes instead of making climate policy a competition in highest subsidies and most symbolic taxes.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

KDKristdemokraternaYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The plan's freshest and most binding requirement is sharply reduced petrol and diesel prices through reduced blending of expensive biofuel, and that climate transition shall occur in a way that both works and is efficient.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan's freshest and most binding requirement is sharply reduced petrol and diesel prices through reduced blending of expensive biofuel, and that climate transition shall occur in a way that both works and is efficient. A bonus-malus system that taxes vehicles harder and a firmer timeframe for a fossil-free vehicle fleet goes against that prioritization and against the plan's view of the car as a prerequisite for living and working throughout the country. The plan supports on the other hand in itself support for non-fossil fuels.

Original (Swedish)

Planens färskaste och mest bindande krav är kraftigt sänkta bensin- och dieselpriser genom minskad inblandning av dyrt biobränsle, och att klimatomställningen ska ske på ett sätt som både fungerar och är effektivt. Ett bonus malus-system som beskattar fordon hårdare och en fastare tidsram för en fossilfri fordonsflotta går emot den prioriteringen och emot planens syn på bilen som en förutsättning för att leva och verka i hela landet. Planen stöder däremot i sig stöd till icke-fossila drivmedel.

  • lower fuel costsdecisive»Sänk bensin- och dieselpriserna rejält för alla, främst genom minskad inblandningen av dyrt biobränsle.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Cut petrol and diesel prices sharply for everyone, chiefly by reducing the blending of expensive biofuel.”
  • efficient climate transition»Sverige är världsledande i klimatomställningen och det ska vi fortsätta vara på ett sätt som både fungerar och är effektivt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden is a world leader in climate transition and we shall continue to be so in a way that both works and is efficient.”
  • the car's necessity»Tillgång till bil är för många en förutsättning för att« (party programme ↗)“Access to a car is for many a prerequisite for”
  • measures for non-fossil fuels»För att minska vägtrafikens utsläpp bör politiken nationellt och på EU-nivå« (party programme ↗)“In order to reduce road transport emissions, policy nationally and at EU level”

flags: spanning_valmanifest_partiprogram

MModeraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan's climate policy for transport is based on electrification and expanding charging stations across the country, with explicit ambition that charging be available even in rural areas.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan's climate policy for transport is based on electrification and expanding charging stations across the country, with explicit ambition that charging be available even in rural areas. That is the core of what the counter-proposal requires, including support for electrification of heavy traffic. However, reference to bonus malus points towards higher vehicle taxes, which the plan's tax freeze speaks against, so the support is not unambiguous.

Original (Swedish)

Planens klimatpolitik för transporter vilar på elektrifiering och på att laddstolpar byggs ut i hela landet, med uttrycklig ambition att laddning ska finnas även i glesbygd. Det är kärnan i vad motförslaget kräver, inklusive stöd till elektrifiering av tyngre trafik. Hänvisningen till bonus malus drar däremot mot högre fordonsskatter, vilket planens skattehöjarstopp talar emot, varför stödet inte är entydigt.

  • expanded charging infrastructuredecisive»Bygga ut laddstolpar och laddstationer i hela landet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Expand charging stations and charging hubs across the country”
  • electrified transport»Vår politik syftar därför till att ställa om transportsektorn genom elektrifiering.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Our policy therefore aims to transform the transport sector through electrification.”
  • charging in rural areas»Tillgången på laddstationer ska vara hög så att även den som bor i glesbygd har användning av en elbil.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The availability of charging stations should be high so that even those living in rural areas can use an electric car.”
  • tax freeze»Införa ett skattehöjarstopp under den kommande mandatperioden som innebär att de samlade skatterna inte höjs« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Introduce a tax freeze during the coming term of office which means that total taxes are not increased”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

SDSverigedemokraternaYesYesfollows the planexplicit

The election manifesto establishes that the transition of the vehicle fleet should take time and occur according to market conditions, and criticizes subsidies for expensive electric cars paid by those without alternatives.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto establishes that the transition of the vehicle fleet should take time and occur according to market conditions, and criticizes subsidies for expensive electric cars paid by those without alternatives. The counter-proposal's requirement for a firmer timeframe for fossil-free and a bonus malus system therefore goes against the plan, which instead wants to reduce the reduction mandate and lower the price at the pump. That the plan itself wants to expand charging infrastructure is not enough to bear the counter-proposal's policy tools.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet slår fast att omställningen av fordonsflottan ska få ta tid och ske utifrån marknadens villkor, och kritiserar subventioner av dyra elbilar som betalas av dem som saknar alternativ. Motförslagets krav på en fastare tidsram för fossilfrihet och ett bonus malus-system går därmed emot planen, som i stället vill minska reduktionsplikten och sänka priset vid pump. Att planen i sig vill bygga ut laddinfrastrukturen räcker inte för att bära motförslagets styrmedel.

  • transition in market pacedecisive»En omställning av fordonsflottan behöver både av ekonomiska och ekologiska skäl få ta tid, och ske utifrån marknadens villkor.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“A transition of the vehicle fleet needs for both economic and ecological reasons to take time, and occur according to market conditions.”
  • criticism of EV subsidies»Subventioner av dyra elbilar som främst används av människor i större städer som dessutom har goda inkomster får i praktiken betalas av de som saknar förutsättningar att själva ta del av förmånerna.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Subsidies for expensive electric cars mainly used by people in larger cities who also have good incomes are in practice paid by those lacking the preconditions to themselves take part in the benefits.”
  • reduced reduction mandate»Sänka bensin- och dieselpriset genom sänkt bränsleskatt och minskad reduktionsplikt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Lower petrol and diesel prices through lower fuel tax and reduced reduction mandate.”
  • charging infrastructure nationwide»Bygga ut laddinfrastrukturen för elbilar« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Expand charging infrastructure for electric cars”

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament