2026-05-272025/26:CU26 · p.2CUCivil law & housing

Interest Differential Compensation

Early-repayment (interest-differential) compensation when switching banks

What's at stake: The outcome affects how easy and cheap it is for consumers to switch banks or repay fixed-rate loans early, which matters for competition in the credit and mortgage market.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is whether the government should review banks' ability to charge interest-differential compensation when consumers switch banks or repay fixed-rate loans early, or whether the current rules should carry over unchanged into the new Consumer Credit Act.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee holds that the rules on interest-differential compensation should carry over unchanged into the new act and opposes the motion; the issue was recently examined and the committee sees no reason to reach a different conclusion now.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 1 (C)

The reservation (C) argues that banks' ability to charge interest-differential compensation when switching banks should be reviewed, so the law more clearly underpins stronger competition in the credit market.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by C.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
VNoYes 21/0/0/0departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
SNoYes 106/0/0/0departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
MPNoYes 17/1/0/0departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
Cown reservationNoNo 0/24/0/0follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
LNoYes 16/0/0/0departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
KDNoYes 19/0/0/0departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
MNoYes 66/0/0/0departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
SDNoYes 70/0/0/0departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed

Broke with the party line

MPAnnika Hirvonen (MP, Stockholms län)No — party line: Yes

MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.

Committee proposal

The Riksdag rejects the motion 2025/26:4088 by Alireza Akhondi et al. (C) demand 1.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motion 2025/26:4088 av Alireza Akhondi m.fl. (C) yrkande 1.

Riksdag decision: The Riksdag approved the government's proposal which addresses strengthening consumer protection on the credit market. The decision includes, among other things, a new consumer credit act. The new consumer credit act is to strengthen consumer protection and adapt it to developments on the consumer credit market in recent years. The law regulates many different aspects of credit provision to consumers. It concerns, among other things, information, right of withdrawal, marketing, and interest rate and cost ceilings. To combat over-indebtedness, the rules for credit assessment are strengthened. Furthermore, a new licensing requirement is introduced which means that more business operators who provide or broker credit, among other things, are to be subject to supervision and meet requirements for sufficient knowledge and competence. Through the proposals, an EU directive on consumer credit is implemented. The new consumer credit act and the legislative changes enter into force on 20 November 2026.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan establishes that indebtedness weakens people's independence and that loan terms should be regulated according to our collective needs rather than financial capital's, and that the state should sharpen competition in the financial sector.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan establishes that indebtedness weakens people's independence and that loan terms should be regulated according to our collective needs rather than financial capital's, and that the state should sharpen competition in the financial sector. Interest rate difference compensation that locks borrowers to their bank goes against both. The plan therefore supports the counter-proposal's demand for a review.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att skuldsättning försvagar människors självständighet och att lånevillkoren ska regleras utifrån våra gemensamma behov snarare än finanskapitalets, samt att staten ska skärpa konkurrensen i finanssektorn. Ränteskillnadsersättning som låser in låntagare hos sin bank går emot båda delarna. Planen stöder därför motförslagets krav på en översyn.

  • loan terms according to collective needsdecisive»våra gemensamma behov snarare än finanskapitalets.« (party programme ↗)“our collective needs rather than financial capital's.”
  • sharpened competition in the financial sector»investeringar, skärpa konkurrensen och förbättra villkoren för mindre« (party programme ↗)“investments, sharpen competition and improve conditions for smaller”
  • indebtedness weakens»Skuldsättning försvagar många människors självständighet och« (party programme ↗)“Indebtedness weakens many people's independence and”
  • stricter bank regulation»Tills dess behövs en hårdare reglering av bankernas« (party programme ↗)“Until then, stricter regulation of banks'”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

SSocialdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan points out that markets that do not function have hit ordinary households with increased costs for everything from food to banking services, and requires that unreasonable pricing is prevented.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan points out that markets that do not function have hit ordinary households with increased costs for everything from food to banking services, and requires that unreasonable pricing is prevented. A review of banks' interest spread compensation to strengthen competition on the credit market follows from that principle. The plan however does not address the question directly.

Original (Swedish)

Planen pekar ut att marknader som inte fungerar drabbat vanliga hushåll med ökade kostnader för allt från livsmedel till banktjänster, och kräver att oskälig prissättning förhindras. En översyn av bankernas ränteskillnadsersättning för att stärka konkurrensen på kreditmarknaden följer av den principen. Planen behandlar dock inte frågan direkt.

  • stop unreasonable pricingdecisive»Förhindrande av priskarteller och oskälig prissättning.« (party programme ↗)“Prevention of price cartels and unreasonable pricing.”
  • households' bank costs»drabbats av ökade kostnader för allt från livsmedel till banktjänster.« (party programme ↗)“affected by increased costs for everything from food to banking services.”
  • regulated market economy»sund och reglerad marknadsekonomi där privata företag kan fungera väl« (party programme ↗)“sound and regulated market economy where private enterprises can function well”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MPMiljöpartietNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan does not address interest rate difference compensation, but it establishes that lack of competition and private monopolies affect ordinary households and that the state has a responsibility to counteract such a development.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan does not address interest rate difference compensation, but it establishes that lack of competition and private monopolies affect ordinary households and that the state has a responsibility to counteract such a development. The financial sector shall also be a driver of societal development, not a source of lock-in. A review that strengthens competition in the credit market thus aligns with the plan's principles.

Original (Swedish)

Planen behandlar inte ränteskillnadsersättning, men den slår fast att bristande konkurrens och privata monopol går ut över vanliga hushåll och att staten har ett ansvar att motverka en sådan utveckling. Finanssektorn ska dessutom vara en drivkraft för samhällsutveckling, inte en källa till inlåsning. En översyn som stärker konkurrensen på kreditmarknaden ligger därför i linje med planens principer.

  • counteract lack of competitiondecisive»präglas av privata monopol och bristande konkurrens.« (party programme ↗)“characterized by private monopolies and lack of competition.”
  • state market responsibility»Staten har ett ansvar att motverka en sådan utveckling.« (party programme ↗)“The state has a responsibility to counteract such a development.”
  • financial sector shall serve society»Det finansiella systemet ska vara en drivkraft för samhällsutveckling« (party programme ↗)“The financial system shall be a driver of societal development”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

CCenterpartietNoNofollows the plannot addressed

The election manifesto stipulates that freer markets and better competition should reduce prices for households, and the party programme sees competition as an important driving force in the market economy.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto stipulates that freer markets and better competition should reduce prices for households, and the party programme sees competition as an important driving force in the market economy. Interest rate differential compensation when changing banks is precisely an obstacle to mobility in the credit market. Reviewing regulations to strengthen competition therefore aligns with the plan, which highlights housing as households' largest investment.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet slår fast att friare marknader och bättre konkurrens ska dämpa priserna för hushållen, och partiprogrammet ser konkurrens som en viktig drivkraft i marknadsekonomin. Ränteskillnadsersättning vid bankbyte är just ett hinder för rörligheten på kreditmarknaden. Att se över reglerna för att stärka konkurrensen ligger därför i linje med planen, som lyfter boendet som hushållens största investering.

  • freer markets reduce pricesdecisive»Genom att skapa friare marknader och förbättra konkurrensen kan vi dämpa priserna ytterligare.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“By creating freer markets and improving competition, we can further reduce prices.”
  • competition as a driving force»Konkurrens är en viktig drivkraft för utvecklingen av marknadsekonomin.« (party programme ↗)“Competition is an important driving force for the development of the market economy.”
  • protect household housing economics»Boendet är den största investeringen många människor gör.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Housing is the largest investment many people make.”
LLiberalernaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan requires that the individual's influence over everyday contracts is strengthened through improved consumer and contract legislation and that competition legislation is strong.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan requires that the individual's influence over everyday contracts is strengthened through improved consumer and contract legislation and that competition legislation is strong. Interest rate difference compensation when switching banks is precisely such a contract terms issue that locks in the consumer and hinders competition on the credit market. The counter-proposal's demand for a review therefore follows from the plan.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver att den enskildes inflytande över vardagens avtal stärks genom förbättrad konsument- och avtalslagstiftning och att konkurrenslagstiftningen är stark. Ränteskillnadsersättning vid bankbyte är just en sådan avtalsvillkorsfråga som låser in konsumenten och hämmar konkurrensen på kreditmarknaden. Motförslagets krav på en översyn följer därför av planen.

  • strengthened consumer power in contractsdecisive»Den enskildes inflytande över de avtal som ingås i vardagen behöver stärkas genom förbättrad konsument- och avtalslagstiftning.« (party programme ↗)“The individual's influence over the contracts entered into in everyday life needs to be strengthened through improved consumer and contract legislation.”
  • strong competition legislation»Därför behövs en stark konkurrenslagstiftning och konsumentlagar som ger rätt till korrekt produktinformation.« (party programme ↗)“Therefore strong competition legislation and consumer laws are needed that give the right to correct product information.”
  • sound competition requires rules»Även den privata makten kan missbrukas. Marknadsekonomin kräver spelregler för att upprätthålla en sund konkurrens.« (party programme ↗)“Private power too can be abused. The market economy requires rules in order to maintain sound competition.”
  • lock-in effects shall be countered»Bostadsmarknaden på expansiva orter präglas av inlåsningseffekter och stelhet.« (party programme ↗)“The housing market in expanding areas is characterized by lock-in effects and rigidity.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

KDKristdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan demands effective competition policy that counters closed markets and disloyal competition, and emphasizes active and well-informed consumers with effective legal rules.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan demands effective competition policy that counters closed markets and disloyal competition, and emphasizes active and well-informed consumers with effective legal rules. A review of banks' interest-rate compensation upon bank switching aims precisely at lowering the thresholds for the consumer and strengthening competition on the credit market. It lies in line with the plan's market view.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver en effektiv konkurrenspolitik som motverkar slutna marknader och illojal konkurrens, och betonar aktiva och välinformerade konsumenter med effektiva rättsliga spelregler. En översyn av bankernas ränteskillnadsersättning vid bankbyte syftar just till att sänka trösklarna för konsumenten och stärka konkurrensen på kreditmarknaden. Det ligger i linje med planens marknadssyn.

  • effective competition policydecisive»En effektiv konkurrenspolitik motverkar oligopol, monopol och illojal konkurrens.« (party programme ↗)“An effective competition policy prevents oligopolies, monopolies and disloyal competition.”
  • the consumer's position»En fungerande marknadsekonomi kräver aktiva och välinformerade konsumenter samt effektiva rättsliga spelregler.« (party programme ↗)“A functioning market economy requires active and well-informed consumers and effective legal rules.”
  • break up closed markets»Det måste ske genom att förenkla regler och förbättra konkurrensen, genom att bryta upp slutna marknader och monopol, och att förhindra otillbörligt statligt stöd.« (party programme ↗)“This must happen by simplifying rules and improving competition, by breaking up closed markets and monopolies, and by preventing improper state aid.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MModeraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan gives the state the task of promoting competition on the markets, and a review of banks' interest difference compensation when switching banks aims to strengthen competition in the credit market.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan gives the state the task of promoting competition on the markets, and a review of banks' interest difference compensation when switching banks aims to strengthen competition in the credit market. The plan also protects the economy of mortgage borrowers, including by maintaining the mortgage interest deduction. The matter is not, however, explicitly addressed, so the conclusion is derived.

Original (Swedish)

Planen ger staten uppgiften att främja konkurrensen på marknaderna, och en översyn av bankernas ränteskillnadsersättning vid bankbyte syftar just till att stärka konkurrensen på kreditmarknaden. Planen värnar också bolånetagarnas ekonomi, bland annat genom att behålla ränteavdraget. Sakfrågan behandlas dock inte uttryckligen, varför slutsatsen är härledd.

  • the state should promote competitiondecisive»institutioner, skydda penningvärdet, främja konkurrensen« (party programme ↗)“institutions, protect the value of money, promote competition”
  • protect mortgage borrowers' economy»Behålla ränteavdraget för bolån« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Keep the mortgage interest deduction”
  • strengthened household economy»Sänka skatten på investeringssparkonton (ISK) – så att du lättare kan spara till en bostad eller till pensionen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Lower the tax on investment savings accounts (ISK) – so you can more easily save for a home or for retirement”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

SDSverigedemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan does not address interest rate differences compensation.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan does not address interest rate differences compensation. The closest commitments are that housing costs shall be braked and that more financing forms for home buyers shall be enabled, within the framework of a regulated market economy. A review that strengthens competition in the credit market and facilitates bank switching aligns with these principles, which is why the plan weakly supports the counter-proposal's demands.

Original (Swedish)

Planen behandlar inte ränteskillnadsersättning. Närmast liggande åtaganden är att boendekostnaderna ska bromsas och att fler finansieringsformer för bostadsköpare ska möjliggöras, inom ramen för en reglerad marknadsekonomi. En översyn som stärker konkurrensen på kreditmarknaden och underlättar bankbyte ligger i linje med dessa principer, varför planen svagt stöder motförslagets krav.

  • lower housing costsdecisive»Åtgärder behöver också vidtas för att bromsa de skenande boendekostnaderna så att fler har råd till ett hem.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Measures also need to be taken to brake the soaring housing costs so that more people can afford a home.”
  • more financing options»Sverigedemokraterna vill stoppa planerna på återinförd fastighetsskatt, sänka elpriserna och möjliggöra fler finansieringsformer för unga och förstagångsköpare av bostäder.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden Democrats want to stop plans for reintroduced property tax, lower electricity prices and enable more financing forms for young and first-time home buyers.”
  • regulated market economy»reglerad marknadsekonomi, byggd på långsiktigt tänkande, är för oss självklar.« (party programme ↗)“a regulated market economy, built on long-term thinking, is self-evident for us.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament