2026-06-152025/26:JuU42 · p.3JuUJustice
Increased penalties etc.
Further sentence increases beyond the government's proposal, including for economic crime
What's at stake: The decision affects whether penalties for, among other things, tax offenses, bookkeeping offenses, fraud, embezzlement and money laundering can be tightened further beyond what the government already proposes, which matters for how organized and economic crime is combated and how high a maximum sentence can be imposed in such cases.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the government's package of tightened penalty scales is sufficient, or whether the Riksdag should instead call on the government to go further - including by introducing a new tier for extremely serious economic crime with a higher maximum sentence.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee assesses that the overall package - nearly fifty tightened penalty scales, the new rule on joint sentencing, the sentence increase for offenses linked to criminal networks, and the expanded presumption for pre-trial detention - together meets the need for penalties to better reflect the seriousness of crime, in light of the developments in society since the last general review in 1989 and the rise in serious and organized crime. The committee therefore sees no need for the further increases called for in the motions and rejects them.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 4 (S)
The reservation (S) wants to intensify work against economic crime as part of tackling the increasingly complex operations of organized crime, and proposes a new tier, extremely serious offense, for a number of economic crimes - tax crime, bookkeeping crime, fraud, fraudulent inducement to invest, embezzlement, subsidy fraud and money-laundering crime. For these extremely serious offenses the reservers want to raise the maximum prison sentence from six to ten years, and a connection to organized crime should be able to serve as grounds for classifying an offense as extremely serious.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 4 by S.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Abstain 0/0/21/0 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| S | No | No 0/105/0/1 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| MP | No | Yes 18/0/0/0 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| C | No | Abstain 0/0/23/1 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| L | No | Yes 16/0/0/0 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| KD | No | Yes 19/0/0/0 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| M | No | Yes 66/0/0/0 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| SD | No | Yes 70/0/0/0 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
Committee proposal
Parliament rejects the motions 2025/26:1277 by Josefin Malmqvist (M) demand 1, 2025/26:1410 by Johanna Rantsi (M), 2025/26:1412 by Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage and Ann-Sofie Alm (both M), 2025/26:1672 by Katarina Tolgfors et al. (M) partial demand 2, 2025/26:2604 by Helena Vilhelmsson et al. (C) partial demand 1, 2025/26:2845 by Markus Wiechel and Alexander Christiansson (both SD) demand 3, 2025/26:3022 by Markus Wiechel et al. (SD), 2025/26:3027 by Noria Manouchi (M) demands 1, 2 and 4, 2025/26:3121 by Kjell-Arne Ottosson (KD), 2025/26:3559 by Mikael Damberg et al. (S) demand 9, 2025/26:3571 by Christian Carlsson (KD) demand 1, 2025/26:3581 by Ulrika Liljeberg et al. (C) demands 3 and 26, 2025/26:3586 by Teresa Carvalho et al. (S) demand 39, 2025/26:4111 by Ulrika Liljeberg et al. (C) demand 2 and 2025/26:4119 by Nooshi Dadgostar et al. (V) demand 1.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2025/26:1277 av Josefin Malmqvist (M) yrkande 1, 2025/26:1410 av Johanna Rantsi (M), 2025/26:1412 av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage och Ann-Sofie Alm (båda M), 2025/26:1672 av Katarina Tolgfors m.fl. (M) delyrkande 2, 2025/26:2604 av Helena Vilhelmsson m.fl. (C) delyrkande 1, 2025/26:2845 av Markus Wiechel och Alexander Christiansson (båda SD) yrkande 3, 2025/26:3022 av Markus Wiechel m.fl. (SD), 2025/26:3027 av Noria Manouchi (M) yrkandena 1, 2 och 4, 2025/26:3121 av Kjell-Arne Ottosson (KD), 2025/26:3559 av Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S) yrkande 9, 2025/26:3571 av Christian Carlsson (KD) yrkande 1, 2025/26:3581 av Ulrika Liljeberg m.fl. (C) yrkandena 3 och 26, 2025/26:3586 av Teresa Carvalho m.fl. (S) yrkande 39, 2025/26:4111 av Ulrika Liljeberg m.fl. (C) yrkande 2 och 2025/26:4119 av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V) yrkande 1.
Riksdag decision: The government wants penalties to better reflect the seriousness of the crimes, the victim perspective to be given increased influence and public protection to be improved. Parliament voted yes on the government's proposal. The proposal means that the ten-year limit for fixed-term penalties is removed approximately 50 penalty scales are increased a new regulation of the joint penalty scale in cases of multiple crimes is introduced, which means that the highest penalty that can be imposed is the highest maximum penalty doubled life imprisonment can be imposed as a joint penalty for certain serious cases of repeated violent and sexual crimes a new penalty increase provision is introduced which targets all crimes that are connected to criminal networks conditions for remand are expanded to include the crimes of serious violation of women's integrity, serious violation of integrity and honor-based oppression. The legislative amendments enter into force on 1 August 2026.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to introduce a new sentencing level for serious economic crimes with a maximum prison sentence of ten years. (S) — Reservation 4
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan establishes that economic crime in companies leads to serious consequences and that effective monitoring of organised economic crime is needed.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that economic crime in companies leads to serious consequences and that effective monitoring of organised economic crime is needed. The counter-proposal's demand for a new category for particularly serious economic crimes, linked to organised crime as grounds, directs criminal law towards exactly what the plan points out. At the same time, the plan emphasises that penalties should be carefully designed to actually reduce crime.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att ekonomisk brottslighet i företag leder till allvarliga konsekvenser och att det behövs en effektiv uppföljning av den organiserade ekonomiska brottsligheten. Motförslagets krav på en ny nivå för synnerligen grova ekonomiska brott, med koppling till organiserad brottslighet som skäl, riktar in straffrätten mot just det planen pekar ut. Planen betonar samtidigt att påföljder ska vara noggrant utformade för att faktiskt sänka brottsligheten.
- economic crime is seriousdecisive»Ekonomisk brottslighet i företag leder till allvarliga konsekvenser,« (party programme ↗)“Economic crime in companies leads to serious consequences,”
- against organised economic crime»Det behövs en effektiv uppföljning av den organiserade« (party programme ↗)“There is a need for effective monitoring of organised”
- reach the proceeds of crime»Tullens och polisens resurser måste öka för att komma åt de pengar som driver narkotikahandeln.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The resources of the Customs and police must increase to reach the money that drives drug trafficking.”
- carefully designed penalties»Straff och andra påföljder för brott behöver vara noggrant« (party programme ↗)“Punishments and other penalties for crime need to be carefully”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wants to crack down hard on the financing of organised crime and stop tax fraud, welfare crime and money laundering.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to crack down hard on the financing of organised crime and stop tax fraud, welfare crime and money laundering. A new tier of particularly serious economic offences, where connection to organised crime can raise the classification, is precisely such a measure against the economic base of crime. The plan also requires penalties in parity with crimes' seriousness and measures against the top tier.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill slå hårt mot den organiserade brottslighetens finansiering och stoppa skattefusk, välfärdsbrottslighet och penningtvätt. En ny nivå av synnerligen grova ekonomiska brott, där koppling till organiserad brottslighet kan höja rubriceringen, är just en sådan åtgärd mot brottslighetens ekonomiska bas. Planen kräver också straff i paritet med brottens allvar och insatser mot toppskiktet.
- crack down on crime's financingdecisive»Slå hårt mot den organiserade brottslighetens finansiering och organisation.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Crack down hard on the financing and organisation of organised crime.”
- stopped economic crime»Skattefusk, välfärdsbrottslighet och penningtvätt ska stoppas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Tax fraud, welfare crime and money laundering shall be stopped.”
- combated fraud»Bekämpande av bedrägerier och all annan ekonomisk brottslighet.« (party programme ↗)“Combating fraud and all other economic crime.”
- prosecution of the top tier»Åtgärder för att gripa och lagföra kriminella grupperingars toppskikt.« (party programme ↗)“Measures to apprehend and prosecute criminal groupings' top tier.”
The counter-proposal wants to introduce a new category for particularly serious economic crimes to address organized crime's economy.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal wants to introduce a new category for particularly serious economic crimes to address organized crime's economy. The plan explicitly wants to strengthen work against criminal economy, prioritize welfare fraud highly and strengthen inter-agency cooperation against money laundering and organized economic crime. The election manifesto also wants to cut off gangs' financing and make it expensive and difficult to be criminal.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslaget vill införa en ny nivå för synnerligen grova ekonomiska brott för att komma åt den organiserade brottslighetens ekonomi. Planen vill uttryckligen stärka arbetet mot den kriminella ekonomin, prioritera välfärdsbrott högt och förstärka myndighetssamverkan mot penningtvätt och organiserad ekonomisk brottslighet. Valmanifestet vill dessutom strypa gängens finansiering och göra det dyrt och svårt att vara kriminell.
- combat criminal economydecisive»Vi vill också stärka arbetet mot den kriminella ekonomin. Brottsvinster ska beslagtas och« (party programme ↗)“We also want to strengthen work against criminal economy. Criminal profits shall be seized and”
- welfare fraud prioritized highly»förtroendet för våra trygghetssystem undergrävs – måste prioriteras högt. Samarbetet och« (party programme ↗)“trust in our security systems is undermined – must be prioritized highly. Cooperation and”
- cut off gangs' financing»stoppa finansieringen av de kriminella gängen genom att stärka myndighetssamverkan så att myndigheterna kan slå till mot den organiserade brottslighetens företag från flera håll« (2022 manifesto ↗)“stop the financing of criminal gangs by strengthening inter-agency cooperation so that authorities can strike against organized crime's enterprises from multiple directions”
- inter-agency cooperation against money laundering»informationsdelningen mellan myndigheter för att stoppa penningtvätt, välfärdsbrott och« (party programme ↗)“information sharing between authorities to stop money laundering, welfare fraud and”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto wants to defeat gangs among other things with stricter sentences and explicitly requires an investigation into gangs' incomes and how these can be cut off.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto wants to defeat gangs among other things with stricter sentences and explicitly requires an investigation into gangs' incomes and how these can be cut off. A new crime category for tax crime, fraud, money laundering and similar with raised maximum sentence attacks precisely the economic side of organized crime. The plan additionally requires tough measures against crimes against companies and tightened rules against corruption.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet vill besegra gängen bland annat med strängare straff och kräver uttryckligen en utredning om gängens inkomster och hur dessa kan strypas. En ny brottsnivå för skattebrott, bedrägeri, penningtvätt och liknande med höjt maximistraff angriper just den ekonomiska sidan av den organiserade brottsligheten. Planen kräver dessutom krafttag mot brott mot företag och skärpta regler mot korruption.
- cut off gangs' incomesdecisive»Dessutom bör en utredning om gängens inkomster och hur dessa kan strypas genomföras.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Moreover an investigation of gangs' incomes and how these can be cut off should be conducted.”
- stricter sentences against organized crime»Samhället ska inte vika sig för gängen. För att besegra dem krävs bättre insatser som förebygger nyrekrytering, mer resurser till polis, åklagare, domstolar och kriminalvården och strängare straff.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Society should not cave in to gangs. To defeat them requires better initiatives that prevent recruitment, more resources to police, prosecutors, courts and prisons and stricter sentences.”
- tough measures against crimes against companies»krafttag mot brott emot företag« (2022 manifesto ↗)“tough measures against crimes against companies”
- tightened rules against economic crime»Vi vill inrätta en antikorruptionsmyndighet, skärpa regler mot korruption och införa ett lobbyregister.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to establish an anti-corruption authority, tighten rules against corruption and introduce a lobby register.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan requires stricter penalties for participation in organized crime and explicitly opens for increasing sentences in particular crime types to mark the seriousness of the crime.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires stricter penalties for participation in organized crime and explicitly opens for increasing sentences in particular crime types to mark the seriousness of the crime. A new level for particularly serious economic crimes, where connection to organized crime can aggravate the offence, is an application of precisely that. The plan does not, however, mention individual economic crimes.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver strängare straff vid medverkan i organiserad brottslighet och öppnar uttryckligen för att skärpa straffsatser i särskilda brottstyper för att markera brottets allvar. En ny nivå för synnerligen grova ekonomiska brott, där koppling till organiserad brottslighet kan kvalificera brottet, är en tillämpning av just det. Planen nämner däremot inte de enskilda ekobrotten.
- stricter penalties for organized crimedecisive»Återfall och upprepad brottslighet ska ge strängare straff, liksom medverkan i organiserad brottslighet.« (party programme ↗)“Repeat and repeated crime shall result in stricter sentences, as shall participation in organized crime.”
- increased sentences»Det kan även finnas särskilda brottstyper där det kan vara befogat att skärpa straffsatserna för att underlätta rehabilitering eller markera allvaret i den kränkning som brottet utgör.« (party programme ↗)“There may also be particular crime types where it may be justified to increase sentences to facilitate rehabilitation or mark the seriousness of the violation the crime constitutes.”
- increased penalties»Vi vill avskaffa dagens mängdrabatt på brott, slopa den närmast automatiska frigivningen från fängelsestraff och skärpa straffen för bland annat vapenbrott, våldtäkt och utpressning.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We wish to abolish today's volume discount on crimes, end the nearly automatic release from imprisonment and increase sentences for, among other things, weapons crimes, rape and extortion.”
- capacity in justice system»Samtidigt behöver vi fler domare och fler åklagare, och fler häkten och fängelser med fler kriminalvårdare.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“At the same time, we need more judges and more prosecutors, and more remand cells and prisons with more correctional officers.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wishes to address the drivers of organized crime, inter alia by confiscating criminals' status symbols, and demands that all crimes be vigorously prosecuted and that the entire justice system be expanded.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wishes to address the drivers of organized crime, inter alia by confiscating criminals' status symbols, and demands that all crimes be vigorously prosecuted and that the entire justice system be expanded. A new tier for particularly serious economic crimes with a higher sentence maximum is in line with this and with the plan's emphasis on integrity in economic life.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill komma åt den organiserade brottslighetens drivkrafter, bland annat genom att beslagta kriminellas statussymboler, och kräver att alla brott effektivt beivras och att hela rättsväsendet byggs ut. En ny nivå för synnerligen grova ekonomiska brott med högre straffmaximum ligger i linje med det och med planens betoning av hederlighet i det ekonomiska livet.
- address criminals' financesdecisive»Beslagta kriminellas statussymboler och bekämpa på så sätt negativa förebilder som rekryterar unga in i gängkriminalitet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Confiscate criminals' status symbols and in that way combat negative role models that recruit young people into gang crime.”
- all crimes shall be prosecuted»upprätthålla de rättsregler som beslutats. Alla brott ska effektivt och utan undantag beivras,« (party programme ↗)“uphold the legal rules that have been decided. All crimes shall be vigorously and without exception prosecuted,”
- expanded justice system»Hela rättsväsendet behöver byggas ut. Fler poliser kräver fler åklagare, domstolar på fler platser i landet och en kraftigt utbyggd kriminalvård.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The entire justice system needs to be expanded. More police officers require more prosecutors, courts in more places in the country and greatly expanded criminal care.”
- integrity in the economy»självständiga aktörer. Hederlighet och personligt ansvarstagande är viktiga fundament. De« (party programme ↗)“independent actors. Integrity and personal responsibility are important foundations. They”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wants to toughen penalties for benefit fraud, seize gang money with reversed burden of proof, and meet organized crime with double sentences.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to toughen penalties for benefit fraud, seize gang money with reversed burden of proof, and meet organized crime with double sentences. A new level for particularly serious economic crimes, where connection to organized crime could be grounds for that classification, aligns with that. The party programme establishes that serious crimes should lead to severe sentences. The demand is supported.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill skärpa straffen för bidragsbrott, ta gängens pengar med omvänd bevisbörda och möta organiserad brottslighet med dubbla straff. En ny nivå för synnerligen grova ekonomiska brott, där koppling till organiserad brottslighet kan vara skäl för den rubriceringen, ligger i linje med det. Partiprogrammet slår fast att grova brott ska leda till stränga straff. Kravet stöds.
- toughened penalties for benefit frauddecisive»Skärpa straffen för bidragsbrott« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Toughen penalties for benefit fraud”
- access crime proceeds»Ta gängens pengar och införa en omvänd bevisbörda för att kunna beslagta gängmedlemmarnas lyxprylar« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Seize gang money and introduce a reversed burden of proof to be able to confiscate gang members' luxury items”
- harsher sentences for organized crime»Införa dubbla straff för gängkriminella« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Introduce double sentences for gang criminals”
- serious crimes lead to severe sentences»stränga straff och kännbara skadestånd« (party programme ↗)“severe sentences and tangible compensation”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wants substantially increased sentences, stricter penalties for social welfare fraud and give the justice system tools to reach the organized crime's finances.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants substantially increased sentences, stricter penalties for social welfare fraud and give the justice system tools to reach the organized crime's finances. The counter-proposal's requirement for a new level for particularly serious economic crimes, with organized crime connection as an aggravating factor, follows from these commitments. The plan thinks few measures are excessive against the gangs.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill kraftigt skärpa straffen, skärpa straffen för fusk inom välfärdssystemen och ge rättsväsendet verktyg att komma åt den organiserade brottslighetens ekonomi. Motförslagets krav på en ny nivå för synnerligen grova ekonomiska brott, med koppling till organiserad brottslighet som skärpande skäl, följer av dessa åtaganden. Planen anser att få åtgärder är för långtgående mot gängen.
- stricter penalties for economic crimedecisive»Skärpa straffen för fusk inom välfärdssystemen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Increase penalties for fraud within the welfare systems”
- substantially increased sentences»Sverigedemokraterna vill kraftigt skärpa straffen och genomföra kraftiga satsningar på polis, åklagare och anstalter.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“the Sweden Democrats want to substantially increase sentences and implement forceful investments in police, prosecutors and prisons.”
- tools against organized crime»Ge rättsväsendet resurser och verktyg för att bekämpa gängen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Give the justice system resources and tools to combat the gangs”
- against criminal finances»Polis, socialtjänst och kronofogde ska ges verktyg att statuera exempel och göra den kriminella livsstilen oattraktiv« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Police, social services and bailiff should be given tools to make an example and make the criminal lifestyle unattractive”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:JuU42)
- Committee report full text (HD01JuU42)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:1277 — Sexualbrott av Josefin Malmqvist (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1410 — Skärpta straff för sexualbrott av Johanna Rantsi (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1412 — Höjt straff för barnpornografibrott av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage och Ann-Sofie Alm (båda M)
- Motion 2025/26:1672 — Skärpt lagstiftning mot gromning och införande av bestämmelse om lockbete av Katarina Tolgfors m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2604 — Utredning om straffskärpning för barnpornografibrott av Helena Vilhelmsson m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2025/26:2845 — Hot mot och ansvar som förtroendevalda av Markus Wiechel och Alexander Christiansson (båda SD)
- Motion 2025/26:3022 — Straffhöjning för övergrepp i rättssak av Markus Wiechel m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:3027 — Skärpta åtgärder mot sexualbrott mot barn av Noria Manouchi (M)
- Motion 2025/26:3121 — Straff för störande av riksdagens arbete av Kjell-Arne Ottosson (KD)
- Motion 2025/26:3229 — Höjd straffskala för kontakt med barn i sexuellt syfte av Marléne Lund Kopparklint (M)
- Motion 2025/26:3559 — Finansiell stabilitet, finansmarknadsfrågor och betalningssystemet av Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:3571 — Skärpta straff för våldtäktsmän och andra av Christian Carlsson (KD)
- Motion 2025/26:3581 — Rättspolitik av Ulrika Liljeberg m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2025/26:3586 — Utgiftsområde 4 Rättsväsendet av Teresa Carvalho m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:4111 — med anledning av prop. 2025/26:218 Dubbla straff för brott i kriminella nätverk och skärpta straffskalor av Ulrika Liljeberg m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2025/26:4114 — med anledning av prop. 2025/26:218 Dubbla straff för brott i kriminella nätverk och skärpta straffskalor av Ulrika Westerlund m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2025/26:4119 — med anledning av prop. 2025/26:218 Dubbla straff för brott i kriminella nätverk och skärpta straffskalor av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:4121 — med anledning av prop. 2025/26:218 Dubbla straff för brott i kriminella nätverk och skärpta straffskalor av Lorena Delgado Varas m.fl. (-)
- Proposition 2025/26:218 — Dubbla straff för brott i kriminella nätverk och skärpta straffskalor
Source: The Swedish Parliament