2023-04-272022/23:FiU22 · p.2FiUEconomy & finance
Macroprudential oversight, mortgage market and household debt
The amortization requirement and evaluation of macroprudential measures in the mortgage market
What's at stake: The amortization requirements and the mortgage cap are central tools for dampening risks linked to household debt, but abolishing the second requirement would primarily affect young adults and single people who otherwise risk being forced onto an insecure second-hand rental market or having to turn down jobs in metropolitan areas.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the second amortization requirement should be abolished pending a broader evaluation of macroprudential measures in the mortgage market, or whether the current rules should stay in place while the Financial Supervisory Authority's ongoing evaluations are completed.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee notes that the Financial Supervisory Authority is already evaluating the temporary exemptions from the amortization requirements and is due to report in June 2023, and that an earlier comprehensive evaluation showed that the mortgage cap and amortization requirements have generally had their intended effects. The committee shares the view that measures taken should be evaluated, but considers that this is already happening as part of the ongoing work, and therefore rejects the motions.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 1 (SD)
The reservation (SD) wants to abolish the second amortization requirement, which applies to mortgage borrowers taking new loans exceeding 4.5 times gross annual income, until it has been shown to be fit for purpose, and also wants to explore a faster amortization rate without an early-repayment fee as well as a symmetry requirement for that fee. The reasoning is that the requirement disproportionately affects young adults and single people, who otherwise risk an insecure second-hand rental market or having to turn down jobs in major cities.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by SD.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have held
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: LLiberalerna
Ja 183–63Ja 170–76
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | Yes | Abstain 0/0/20/4 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| S | Yes | Yes 94/0/0/13 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| MP | Yes | Abstain 0/0/16/2 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| C | No | Abstain 0/0/20/4 | differs | confidence: high | explicit |
| L | No | Yes 13/0/0/3 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| KD | No | Yes 16/0/0/3 | differs | confidence: low | derived |
| M | No | Yes 60/0/0/8 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| SD | No | No 0/63/0/10 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2022/23:246 by Ali Esbati et al. (V) demands 1 and 2, 2022/23:322 by Markus Wiechel (SD) demands 1-3, 2022/23:346 by Rickard Nordin (C), 2022/23:762 by Katarina Luhr et al. (MP) demand 7, 2022/23:865 by Alireza Akhondi et al. (C) demand 5, 2022/23:910 by Alireza Akhondi et al. (C) demands 10 and 12, 2022/23:956 by Oscar Sjöstedt et al. (SD) demands 4 and 6-9 and 2022/23:2070 by Robert Hannah (L) demand 5.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2022/23:246 av Ali Esbati m.fl. (V) yrkandena 1 och 2, 2022/23:322 av Markus Wiechel (SD) yrkandena 1-3, 2022/23:346 av Rickard Nordin (C), 2022/23:762 av Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP) yrkande 7, 2022/23:865 av Alireza Akhondi m.fl. (C) yrkande 5, 2022/23:910 av Alireza Akhondi m.fl. (C) yrkandena 10 och 12, 2022/23:956 av Oscar Sjöstedt m.fl. (SD) yrkandena 4 och 6-9 samt 2022/23:2070 av Robert Hannah (L) yrkande 5.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag has considered a government statement on the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the World Bank Group and regional development and investment banks during 2021 and 2022. The statement concerns, among other things, how the institutions work on financial and monetary stability. The Riksdag notes that the IMF and the other economic institutions have an important role to play, among other things to identify and highlight risks to financial stability. The work of the institutions has been greatly affected by both the COVID-19 pandemic and Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine. The Riksdag welcomes that the institutions have helped member countries manage the economic consequences, and have also supported Ukraine through financing, technical support and coordination. The Riksdag places the statement on file, that is, closes the matter. The Riksdag has also considered approximately 80 proposals in motions submitted during the general motion period of 2022. The motions concern, among other things, macroprudential oversight, the mortgage market and household debt, as well as money laundering. The Riksdag rejects the proposals, among other things by referring to the fact that the government is already working on the issues.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to abolish the second mortgage amortization requirement and investigate opportunities for increased amortization rates without interest rate compensation. (SD) — Reservation 1
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan responds to young people and single people's housing problems with massive building, state-owned housing company and lower rents — not with easier credit and higher debt.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan responds to young people and single people's housing problems with massive building, state-owned housing company and lower rents — not with easier credit and higher debt. It instead requires that the power of financial capital is broken through regulations because financial expansion creates crises. To abolish the second amortisation requirement loosens exactly such regulation and is therefore rejected.
Original (Swedish)
Planen svarar på unga och ensamståendes bostadsproblem med massivt byggande, statligt byggbolag och sänkta hyror — inte med lättare kreditgivning och högre skuldsättning. Den kräver tvärtom att finanskapitalets makt bryts genom regleringar eftersom finansiell expansion skapar kriser. Att avskaffa det andra amorteringskravet luckrar upp just sådan reglering och avvisas därför.
- regulation of the financial sectordecisive»Finanskapitalets makt måste brytas genom regleringar och ökad« (party programme ↗)“The power of financial capital must be broken through regulations and increased”
- housing crisis's cause is the market»Byggtakten har hållits nere för att bostadspriserna ska fortsätta att stiga, hyresgäster krävs på allt högre hyror medan den som köper bostadsrätt lägger allt större del av sin inkomst på bostaden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The building pace has been held down so that housing prices continue to rise, tenants are charged ever higher rents while the person who buys a housing cooperative puts an ever larger part of their income on the home.”
- state-owned housing construction»Vänsterpartiet vill se ett statligt byggbolag, investeringsstöd för ökat bostadsbyggande och en aktiv markpolitik.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Left Party wants to see a state-owned housing company, investment support for increased housing construction and active land policy.”
- stricter bank regulation»Vänsterpartiet vill se en lag om bankdelning.« (party programme ↗)“The Left Party wants to see a law on bank division.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan's answer to high housing costs is building rental apartments that ordinary people can afford and a public responsibility for housing provision, not easier debt creation.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's answer to high housing costs is building rental apartments that ordinary people can afford and a public responsibility for housing provision, not easier debt creation. The party programme describes growing household debt as the root of financial instability, and the election manifesto requires great care with households' finances. To abolish the second amortisation requirement therefore goes against the plan's line. Amortisation requirements are not discussed explicitly.
Original (Swedish)
Planens svar på höga boendekostnader är byggande av hyresrätter som vanligt folk har råd med och ett samhälleligt ansvar för bostadsförsörjningen, inte lättare skuldsättning. Partiprogrammet beskriver växande hushållsskulder som roten till finansiell instabilitet, och valmanifestet kräver stor varsamhet med hushållens ekonomi. Att avskaffa det andra amorteringskravet går därför emot planens linje. Amorteringskrav behandlas inte uttryckligen.
- debt-driven economy is unstabledecisive»Svåra fördelningskonflikter har tillfälligt kunnat undvikas genom att skuldsättningen i den« (party programme ↗)“Serious distribution conflicts have temporarily been avoided through debt growth in the”
- build affordable rental apartments»Vi ska fortsätta att bygga hyresrätter som vanligt folk har råd att bo i.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We shall continue to build rental apartments that ordinary people can afford to live in.”
- housing as a social right»socialdemokrater ser bostaden som en social rättighet och bostadspolitiken som en del av« (party programme ↗)“social democrats see housing as a social right and housing policy as part of”
- careful economic policy»Den ekonomiska politiken behöver bedrivas med stor varsamhet och respekt för vanliga hushålls ekonomi.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Economic policy needs to be conducted with great care and respect for ordinary households' finances.”
Worldstate weighed in: Policy rate 3.0 per cent and CPI inflation 10.6 per cent — Rising interest costs strengthen the plan's warning on household debt; Business confidence barometer 90.8 and weak GDP development — Increases risk for households with high loans, which speaks against eased requirements
The plan views high private debt as a risk for both the individual and the national economy and wants to counter over-indebtedness and excessive risk-taking in the financial market.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan views high private debt as a risk for both the individual and the national economy and wants to counter over-indebtedness and excessive risk-taking in the financial market. Abolishing the second amortization requirement would increase household debt ratios, which goes against this commitment. The plan wants to solve young people's difficulties in the housing market with more rental apartments at reasonable rents, not with larger loans.
Original (Swedish)
Planen betraktar hög privat skuldsättning som en risk för både individen och samhällsekonomin och vill motverka överskuldsättning och överdrivet risktagande på finansmarknaden. Att avskaffa det andra amorteringskravet skulle öka hushållens skuldkvot, vilket går emot detta åtagande. Ungas svårigheter på bostadsmarknaden vill planen lösa med fler hyresrätter till rimliga hyror, inte med större lån.
- debt as a societal riskdecisive»hög privat skuldsättning är en risk för individen« (party programme ↗)“high private debt is a risk for the individual”
- counter over-indebtedness»Girighet, överskuldsättning och spekulation ska motverkas.« (party programme ↗)“Greed, over-indebtedness and speculation shall be countered.”
- housing shortage solved by building»bygga fler klimatsmarta hyresrätter med rimliga hyror, utveckla och utöka investeringsstödet som gjorde det billigare att bygga och se till att fler kan äga sin bostad.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“build more climate-smart rental apartments with reasonable rents, develop and expand investment support that made it cheaper to build and ensure that more can own their home.”
- dampen risk-taking in the credit market»motverka det överdrivna risktagande som dominerat« (party programme ↗)“counter the excessive risk-taking that has dominated”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan explicitly says that the strengthened amortization requirement is forced saving for those with lowest incomes and should be abolished when interest rates normalize, and that the amortization requirement should be reviewed.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly says that the strengthened amortization requirement is forced saving for those with lowest incomes and should be abolished when interest rates normalize, and that the amortization requirement should be reviewed. The counter-proposal's requirement that the second amortization requirement be abolished is thereby the plan's own line. The plan particularly points out young people and single people with small margins.
Original (Swedish)
Planen säger uttryckligen att det förstärkta amorteringskravet är ett påtvingat sparande för dem med lägst inkomster och bör avskaffas när ränteläget normaliseras, och att amorteringskravet ska ses över. Motförslagets krav på att avskaffa det andra amorteringskravet är därmed planens egen linje. Planen pekar särskilt ut unga och ensamstående med små marginaler.
- abolish strengthened amortization requirementdecisive»Det förstärkta amorteringskravet — ett påtvingat sparande för dem med lägst inkomster — bör avskaffas när ränteläget nu normaliseras.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The strengthened amortization requirement — forced saving for those with lowest incomes — should be abolished when interest rates now normalize.”
- review of amortization requirement»Därför vill vi se över amorteringskravet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Therefore we want to review the amortization requirement.”
- young and single in focus»Det handlar bland annat om ensamstående föräldrar, småbarnsfamiljer och unga som försöker spara ihop till sin första bostad.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“This concerns among other things single parents, families with small children and young people trying to save up for their first home.”
- not more expensive to live»Vi kommer inte att medverka till några skattehöjningar som skadar jobben, det egna sparandet eller gör det dyrare att bo.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We will not participate in any tax increases that harm jobs, personal saving or make it more expensive to live.”
Worldstate weighed in: Interest rate raised to 3.0 per cent after rapid increases — The plan's condition about a normalized interest rate is met, which activates the requirement for abolition; Inflation of 10.6 per cent erodes households' margins — Reinforces the plan's objection to forced saving for those with lowest incomes
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan explicitly requires that the increased amortization requirement be abolished, together with an incentive to save for the first deposit.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly requires that the increased amortization requirement be abolished, together with an incentive to save for the first deposit. The counter-proposal's demand to abolish the second amortization requirement is thus precisely the plan's commitment. The plan justifies this by saying that more should be able to afford their own home and that the lock-in particularly affects those trying to enter the housing market.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver uttryckligen att det förhöjda amorteringskravet slopas, tillsammans med en stimulans för att spara till den första insatsen. Motförslagets krav på att avskaffa det andra amorteringskravet är därmed just planens åtagande. Planen motiverar det med att fler ska ha råd med en egen bostad och att inlåsningen särskilt drabbar dem som ska ta sig in på bostadsmarknaden.
- abolish increased amortization requirementdecisive»Vi vill införa en stimulans för att spara ihop till den första insatsen, slopa det förhöjda amorteringskravet, korta överklagandeprocesserna och fortsätta förenkla byggreglerna.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We wish to introduce an incentive to save for the first deposit, abolish the increased amortization requirement, shorten appeal processes and continue to simplify building regulations.”
- more should own their home»Att få uppleva frihetskänslan av en egen bostad är något många fler ska få göra.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“To experience the feeling of freedom of owning one's own home is something many more should be able to do.”
- young people onto housing market»som vill få fotfäste och komma in på bostadsmarknaden: ungdomar, invandrare och nyinflyttade.« (party programme ↗)“who wish to gain a foothold and enter the housing market: young people, immigrants and newcomers.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan wishes to give those who desire it the opportunity to own their home and establishes that even low-income families, pensioners and students shall reach a good housing standard, with more housing as an explicit goal.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wishes to give those who desire it the opportunity to own their home and establishes that even low-income families, pensioners and students shall reach a good housing standard, with more housing as an explicit goal. A debt-to-income cap that shuts out young people and single individuals from home ownership counters this, which argues for abolishing the second amortization requirement. The plan's demands for high household savings and restraint work in the opposite direction at the same time.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill ge dem som önskar möjlighet att äga sin bostad och slår fast att även lågavlönade familjer, pensionärer och studerande ska nå en god bostadsstandard, med fler bostäder som uttalat mål. Ett skuldkvotstak som stänger ute unga och ensamstående från ägt boende motverkar detta, vilket talar för att avskaffa det andra amorteringskravet. Planens krav på högt hushållssparande och återhållsamhet drar samtidigt i motsatt riktning.
- opportunity to own one's homedecisive»ge dem som så önskar möjlighet att äga sin bostad.« (party programme ↗)“give those who so wish the opportunity to own their home.”
- housing for vulnerable groups»Lågavlönade barnfamiljer, pensionärer och studerande måste ges möjligheter till en god bostadsstandard.« (party programme ↗)“Low-income families with children, pensioners and students must be given opportunities for a good housing standard.”
- more homes»FLER BOSTÄDER« (2022 manifesto ↗)“MORE HOMES”
- high household savings»måste hållas högt genom hushållssparande och genom« (party programme ↗)“must be kept high through household savings and through”
Worldstate weighed in: Interest rate 3.0 per cent and inflation 10.6 per cent — raised housing costs sharpen the threshold for young people and single individuals whom the plan wishes to protect
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan's housing line is that everyone should dare to dream of owning their own home and that household housing costs should not be pressured by property tax or reduced mortgage deductions.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's housing line is that everyone should dare to dream of owning their own home and that household housing costs should not be pressured by property tax or reduced mortgage deductions. A debt-ratio-based amortization requirement that excludes young adults and single people from home ownership works against that commitment, which speaks for the counter-proposal's demands. The amortization requirements are not mentioned explicitly, but the plan states that interest rate increases pressure households.
Original (Swedish)
Planens bostadslinje är att alla ska våga drömma om att äga sin egen bostad och att hushållens boendekostnader inte ska pressas genom fastighetsskatt eller sänkta ränteavdrag. Ett skuldkvotsbaserat amorteringskrav som stänger ute unga vuxna och ensamstående från ägt boende arbetar mot det åtagandet, vilket talar för motförslagets krav. Amorteringskraven nämns inte uttryckligen, men planen konstaterar att räntehöjningar pressar hushållen.
- home ownership for moredecisive»I Moderaternas Sverige ska alla våga drömma om att äga sin egen bostad.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“In the Moderate Party's Sweden, everyone should dare to dream of owning their own home.”
- protect mortgage borrowers»Behålla ränteavdraget för bolån« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Keep the mortgage interest deduction”
- no new housing burdens»Stoppa återinförandet av fastighetsskatten och sänkta ränteavdrag« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Stop the reintroduction of property tax and reduced mortgage deductions”
- pressured household economy»Räntehöjningar pressar hushållen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Interest rate increases pressure households”
Worldstate weighed in: Policy rate at 3.0 percent and rapidly rising mortgage rates — The debt-ratio cap's exclusionary effect on young mortgage borrowers becomes more powerful than when the plan was written.; Inflation at 10.6 percent annually — Household margins shrink, which strengthens the plan's argument against additional cost pressure on housing.
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wants to slow surging housing costs and make more financing options available for young people and first-time buyers, and notes that Swedish youth find it difficult to buy housing.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to slow surging housing costs and make more financing options available for young people and first-time buyers, and notes that Swedish youth find it difficult to buy housing. Abolishing the second amortization requirement, which hits young and single people, aligns with this commitment. With high inflation and substantially higher interest rates, the burden of the requirement becomes larger than the plan assumed.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill bromsa de skenande boendekostnaderna och möjliggöra fler finansieringsformer för unga och förstagångsköpare, och konstaterar att svenska ungdomar har svårt att skaffa bostad. Att avskaffa det andra amorteringskravet, som slår mot unga och ensamstående, ligger i linje med detta åtagande. Med hög inflation och kraftigt högre ränteläge blir bördan av kravet större än planen förutsatte.
- financing for first-time buyersdecisive»Sverigedemokraterna vill stoppa planerna på återinförd fastighetsskatt, sänka elpriserna och möjliggöra fler finansieringsformer för unga och förstagångsköpare av bostäder.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“the Sweden Democrats want to stop plans for reintroduced property tax, lower electricity prices and make more financing options available for young people and first-time buyers of housing.”
- young people's first home»Förbättra möjligheterna för unga att skaffa sin första bostad« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Improve opportunities for young people to get their first home”
- slow housing costs»Åtgärder behöver också vidtas för att bromsa de skenande boendekostnaderna så att fler har råd till ett hem.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Measures also need to be taken to slow the soaring housing costs so more people can afford a home.”
- young people's housing shortage»Många grupper, däribland svenska ungdomar, har idag svårt att skaffa bostad.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Many groups, including Swedish young people, today find it difficult to get housing.”
Worldstate weighed in: CPI inflation 10.6 per cent and policy rate 3.0 per cent — Substantially higher housing expenses make the amortization requirement's threshold effect for young people larger than the plan assumed
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2022/23:FiU22)
- Committee report full text (HA01FiU22)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2022/23:1003 — Sverigevänlig konsumentpolitik av Mikael Eskilandersson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2022/23:1007 — Krafttag mot överskuldsättning av Mikael Eskilandersson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2022/23:1040 — Stärkt lokal banknärvaro av Kalle Olsson och Anna-Caren Sätherberg (båda S)
- Motion 2022/23:1048 — Landsbygden och banker av Mikael Dahlqvist och Lars Mejern Larsson (båda S)
- Motion 2022/23:105 — Kontanthantering och betaltjänster av Saila Quicklund (M)
- Motion 2022/23:1064 — Kontanter av Dzenan Cisija och Johan Büser (båda S)
- Motion 2022/23:1116 — Swishtjänst för hela Europeiska unionen av Gudrun Brunegård (KD)
- Motion 2022/23:1119 — Det kontantlösa samhället av Torsten Elofsson (KD)
- Motion 2022/23:1121 — Fler företag, fler jobb och stärkt konkurrenskraft i hela landet av Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2022/23:1137 — Aktiemarknaden av David Perez och Dennis Dioukarev (båda SD)
- Motion 2022/23:1199 — Digitala fakturor av Åsa Karlsson och Helén Pettersson (båda S)
- Motion 2022/23:1296 — Krav på kontanthantering av Leonid Yurkovskiy (SD)
- Motion 2022/23:1314 — En grön investeringsbank av Mathias Tegnér och Markus Kallifatides (båda S)
- Motion 2022/23:1620 — Sparbankers kapitalförsörjning och mindre bankers regelverk av Mikael Larsson och Catarina Deremar (båda C)
- Motion 2022/23:1643 — En hållbar digitalisering av Niels Paarup-Petersen m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2022/23:1672 — En levande landsbygd för Sveriges bästa av Annie Lööf m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2022/23:171 — Värnande av kontanter av Ann-Christine From Utterstedt (SD)
- Motion 2022/23:1808 — Regelverk för stiftelser och premie- och stipendiefonder av Mikael Oscarsson (KD)
- Motion 2022/23:1916 — Bankkonto för barn och ungdomar av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2022/23:2070 — Ekonomiskt våld mot kvinnor av Robert Hannah (L)
Source: The Swedish Parliament