2026-03-252025/26:UU14 · p.2UUForeign affairs
Ecocide
Ecocide as a crime under the Rome Statute
What's at stake: Making ecocide an international crime could enable prosecution of large-scale environmental destruction, including in war, but requires reopening a sensitive international agreement with an uncertain outcome.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether Sweden should actively push to add ecocide to the Rome Statute and criminalize large-scale environmental destruction now, or whether the matter should proceed through continued analysis while waiting for broader international support.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee shares the intent to strengthen the international framework against ecocide but considers that amending the Rome Statute requires extensive analysis and that there is currently insufficient support among the statute's parties; the committee instead wants to follow the government's continued analysis and work, and therefore rejects the motions.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 5 (S)
The reservation (S) wants Sweden to take the initiative to add ecocide to the Rome Statute and actively push to criminalize large-scale environmental destruction, pointing out that such destruction is part of Russia's war strategy and that Sweden should support efforts to build cases against those responsible.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 5 by S.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Abstain 0/0/19/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| S | No | No 0/92/0/14 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| MP | No | Abstain 0/0/15/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: high | explicit |
| C | No | Abstain 0/0/17/7 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| L | No | Yes 14/0/0/2 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| KD | No | Yes 17/0/0/2 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| M | No | Yes 59/0/0/9 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| SD | Yes | Yes 57/0/0/13 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2024/25:1441 by Yasmine Eriksson et al. (SD) claims 1 and 2, 2024/25:3061 by Rebecka Le Moine et al. (MP) claim 1, 2024/25:3107 by Morgan Johansson et al. (S) claim 30, 2024/25:3162 by Kerstin Lundgren et al. (C) claim 61, 2025/26:3358 by Rebecka Le Moine et al. (MP) claim 1, 2025/26:3596 by Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist et al. (C) claim 46, 2025/26:3623 by Morgan Johansson et al. (S) claim 53 and 2025/26:3729 by Kerstin Lundgren et al. (C) claim 76.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2024/25:1441 av Yasmine Eriksson m.fl. (SD) yrkandena 1 och 2, 2024/25:3061 av Rebecka Le Moine m.fl. (MP) yrkande 1, 2024/25:3107 av Morgan Johansson m.fl. (S) yrkande 30, 2024/25:3162 av Kerstin Lundgren m.fl. (C) yrkande 61, 2025/26:3358 av Rebecka Le Moine m.fl. (MP) yrkande 1, 2025/26:3596 av Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist m.fl. (C) yrkande 46, 2025/26:3623 av Morgan Johansson m.fl. (S) yrkande 53 och 2025/26:3729 av Kerstin Lundgren m.fl. (C) yrkande 76.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected approximately 190 proposals in motions from the general motion period 2024 and from the general motion period 2025 concerning international law, including humanitarian law, human rights and democracy and the principles of the rule of law. The proposals concern, among other things, how Sweden should support the international courts that apply international law, whether ecocide should be introduced as a new crime in international law, what support Sweden should provide to the democracy movement in Hong Kong and how women's, children's and LGBTQ persons' human rights should be protected.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to actively support international legal institutions to counter impunity. (S) — Reservation 5
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan wants Sweden to play a driving role in far-reaching international climate agreements and ambitious environmental goals followed up with sharp legislation.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants Sweden to play a driving role in far-reaching international climate agreements and ambitious environmental goals followed up with sharp legislation. It also wants to strengthen the UN's and international law's position so that breaches of international law can be prosecuted. Pushing for ecocide to be added to the international criminal code is a direct application of these commitments, even though ecocide is not mentioned.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill att Sverige spelar en pådrivande roll för långtgående internationella klimatavtal och att ambitiösa miljömål följs upp med skarp lagstiftning. Den vill också stärka FN:s och folkrättens ställning så att brott mot internationell lag kan beivras. Att driva på för att foga ekocid till det internationella brottmålsregelverket är en direkt tillämpning av dessa åtaganden, även om ekocid inte nämns.
- driving international climate policydecisive»i klimatomställningen. Vi vill att Sverige ska spela en pådrivande roll« (party programme ↗)“in the climate transformation. We want Sweden to play a driving role”
- sharp environmental legislation»miljömål som följs upp med skarp lagstiftning och praktiskt arbete.« (party programme ↗)“environmental goals followed up with sharp legislation and practical work.”
- strengthened UN and international law»Vi vill därför att Sverige verkar för att FN ska spela en större roll« (party programme ↗)“We therefore want Sweden to work for the UN to play a larger role”
- stop large-scale environmental destruction»Ett ständigt överutnyttjande av naturens resurser leder till kraftig utarmning av den biologiska mångfalden och växthusgasutsläpp.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Continuous overuse of nature's resources leads to severe depletion of biological diversity and greenhouse gas emissions.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan builds foreign policy on international law and requires that there be no impunity for the most serious international crimes, while it wants to protect nature and for Sweden to be a driving force in the UN and EU.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan builds foreign policy on international law and requires that there be no impunity for the most serious international crimes, while it wants to protect nature and for Sweden to be a driving force in the UN and EU. Working to bring ecocide into the international criminal law framework unites exactly these commitments. The plan therefore supports the counter-proposal's requirement, even though it does not mention ecocide.
Original (Swedish)
Planen bygger utrikespolitiken på folkrätten och kräver att det inte ska finnas straffrihet för de grövsta internationella brotten, samtidigt som den vill värna naturen och att Sverige ska vara pådrivande i FN och EU. Att verka för att ekocid förs in i det internationella brottmålsregelverket förenar just dessa åtaganden. Planen stöder därför motförslagets krav, även om den inte nämner ekocid.
- no impunity for serious crimesdecisive»Ingen straffrihet för folkmord, krigsförbrytelser och brott mot mänskligheten.« (party programme ↗)“No impunity for genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity.”
- international law is defended»Försvar för folkrätten och en regelbaserad världsordning.« (party programme ↗)“Defence of international law and a rules-based world order.”
- protection of nature and environment»Värn av biologisk mångfald och Sveriges värdefulla natur och vattenmiljöer.« (party programme ↗)“Protection of biodiversity and Sweden's valuable nature and water environments.”
- driving force in the UN and EU»Sverige ska vara en stark kraft i FN och EU för att världens länder ska öka sina åtaganden för att göra verklighet av Parisavtalets ambitioner.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden shall be a strong force in the UN and EU for the world's countries to increase their commitments to realize the ambitions of the Paris Agreement.”
The election manifesto explicitly states that Sweden shall work for ecocide legislation, and the party programme wants large-scale environmental crimes to be classified as an international crime with enhanced penalties.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto explicitly states that Sweden shall work for ecocide legislation, and the party programme wants large-scale environmental crimes to be classified as an international crime with enhanced penalties. The counter-proposal's demand that Sweden takes the initiative to add ecocide to the international criminal law framework is thus exactly what the plan requires. The plan also wants Sweden to support international courts and increase accountability.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet slår uttryckligen fast att Sverige ska verka för en ekocidlagstiftning, och partiprogrammet vill att storskaliga miljöbrott klassas som ett internationellt brott med skärpta påföljder. Motförslagets krav att Sverige tar initiativ till att foga ekocid till det internationella brottmålsregelverket är därmed exakt det planen kräver. Planen vill dessutom att Sverige stödjer de internationella domstolarna och ökar ansvarsutkrävandet.
- ecocide legislationdecisive»att Sverige verkar för en ekocidlagstiftning.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“that Sweden works for ecocide legislation.”
- ecocide as international crime»Storskaliga miljöbrott, ekocid, klassas som ett internationellt brott.« (party programme ↗)“Large-scale environmental crimes, ecocide, are classified as an international crime.”
- enhanced penalties for environmental destruction»De rättsliga påföljderna behöver skärpas för miljöförstöring som får långvariga och utbredda konsekvenser för natur och människor.« (party programme ↗)“The legal penalties need to be enhanced for environmental destruction that has long-lasting and widespread consequences for nature and people.”
- support for international courts»Sveriges ska stödja de internationella domstolarna och verka för att öka ansvarsutkrävandet för brott mot folkrätten.« (party programme ↗)“Sweden shall support international courts and work to increase accountability for violations of international law.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The party programme establishes that cross-border challenges like climate issues and international crime can only be solved through international cooperation, and that it should always be unprofitable to act as an environmental destroyer.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme establishes that cross-border challenges like climate issues and international crime can only be solved through international cooperation, and that it should always be unprofitable to act as an environmental destroyer. That the absence of broad international agreements should not prevent Sweden from leading the way speaks for pushing to criminalize large-scale environmental destruction. Foreign policy's purpose of protecting universal rights points in the same direction.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår fast att gränsöverskridande utmaningar som klimatfrågan och internationell brottslighet bara kan lösas genom internationellt samarbete, och att det alltid ska vara olönsamt att agera miljöförstörande. Att frånvaron av breda internationella överenskommelser inte får hindra Sverige från att gå före talar för att driva på för att kriminalisera storskalig miljöförstöring. Utrikespolitikens syfte att värna universella rättigheter pekar åt samma håll.
- international cooperation against cross-border threatsdecisive»Utmaningar som är gemensamma för många nationer, som tullmurar, klimatfrågan och internationell brottslighet, kan bara lösas genom internationellt samarbete.« (party programme ↗)“Challenges that are common to many nations, such as tariffs, climate issues and international crime, can only be solved through international cooperation.”
- environmental destruction should be punished economically»Det ska alltid vara lönsamt att vara miljövårdande och olönsamt att agera miljöförstörande.« (party programme ↗)“It should always be profitable to be environmentally responsible and unprofitable to act as an environmental destroyer.”
- Sweden should lead the way»får inte hindra nationer och regioner från att gå före och tillämpa skärpta krav« (party programme ↗)“must not prevent nations and regions from leading the way and applying tightened requirements”
- universal rights in foreign policy»Utrikes- och säkerhetspolitiken syftar ytterst till att värna universella mänskliga fri- och rättigheter.« (party programme ↗)“Foreign and security policy ultimately aims to protect universal human freedoms and rights.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The party programme wants to strengthen the International Criminal Court's role for prosecuting crimes against human rights and make Sweden a driving force in global sustainability work.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme wants to strengthen the International Criminal Court's role for prosecuting crimes against human rights and make Sweden a driving force in global sustainability work. The election manifesto promises value-driven foreign policy where Sweden does much more within international cooperation. That Sweden takes the initiative to add ecocide to the international criminal law framework follows from these commitments, in line with the requirement for clear sanctions for environmental violations.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet vill stärka Internationella brottmålsdomstolens roll för att lagföra brott mot mänskliga rättigheter och göra Sverige till en pådrivande kraft i det globala hållbarhetsarbetet. Valmanifestet lovar en värderingsstyrd utrikespolitik där Sverige gör mycket mer inom internationella samarbeten. Att Sverige tar initiativ till att foga ekocid till det internationella brottmålsregelverket följer av dessa åtaganden, i linje med kravet på tydliga sanktioner vid miljööverträdelser.
- strengthened international criminal courtdecisive»Internationella brottmålsdomstolens roll för att lagföra brott mot mänskliga rättigheter ska stärkas.« (party programme ↗)“The International Criminal Court's role for prosecuting crimes against human rights shall be strengthened.”
- driving force in global environmental work»Sverige ska vara en förebild och en pådrivande kraft i det globala arbetet för ett hållbart samhälle.« (party programme ↗)“Sweden shall be a role model and a driving force in global work for a sustainable society.”
- value-driven foreign policy»Därför vill vi att Sverige gör mycket mer, både som enskilt land och inom internationella samarbeten, för fri- och rättigheter, frihandel, fria val och samarbete i den fria världen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Therefore we want Sweden to do much more, both as a single nation and within international cooperation, for freedom and rights, free trade, free choice and cooperation in the free world.”
- sanctions for environmental violations»Det behövs tydliga sanktioner vid överträdelser av bestämmelser gällande utsläpp, vattenrening, transportsäkerhet och fiske.« (party programme ↗)“There need to be clear sanctions for violations of provisions regarding emissions, water purification, transport safety and fishing.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan requires that international courts and legal systems within the UN system be protected and strengthened, and that international law has rules for how abuses can be combated internationally.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that international courts and legal systems within the UN system be protected and strengthened, and that international law has rules for how abuses can be combated internationally. The stewardship principle makes responsible stewardship of natural resources into a core value, and the party's historical narrative affirms that crimes against humanity are prosecuted. To work toward bringing ecocide into the international criminal law framework follows from this.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att internationella domstolar och rättssystem inom FN-systemet skyddas och stärks, och att folkrätten har regler för hur övergrepp kan beivras internationellt. Förvaltarskapsprincipen gör ansvarsfull förvaltning av naturresurser till ett grundvärde, och partiets historieskrivning bejakar att brott mot mänskligheten lagförs. Att verka för att ekocid förs in i det internationella brottmålsregelverket följer av detta.
- strengthened international courtsdecisive»internationella domstolar och rättssystem inom FN-systemet« (party programme ↗)“international courts and legal systems within the UN system”
- stewardship of natural resources»naturresurserna måste förvaltas ansvarsfullt« (party programme ↗)“natural resources must be managed responsibly”
- international legal rules against abuse»folkrätten finnas regler för hur och när internationella organisationer som FN, EU och NATO« (party programme ↗)“international law has rules for how and when international organizations such as the UN, EU and NATO”
- accountability for war crimes»Krigsförbrytare ställdes inför rätta och dömdes för brott mot mänskligheten« (party programme ↗)“War criminals were brought to trial and convicted for crimes against humanity”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto commits to toughening penalties for environmental crimes and working with other countries through effective international cooperation, and aid policy shall prioritize democracy and human rights.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto commits to toughening penalties for environmental crimes and working with other countries through effective international cooperation, and aid policy shall prioritize democracy and human rights. Working for large-scale environmental destruction to be criminalized in international law aligns with these commitments. The plan however does not address ecocide as a crime classification, and its warning against expensive symbolic politics makes the conclusion uncertain.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet åtar sig att skärpa straffen för miljöbrott och att arbeta med andra länder genom effektivt internationellt samarbete, och biståndspolitiken ska prioritera demokrati och mänskliga rättigheter. Att verka för att storskalig miljöförstöring kriminaliseras i det internationella regelverket ligger i linje med dessa åtaganden. Planen behandlar dock inte ekocid som brottsrubricering, och dess varning för dyrbar symbolpolitik gör slutsatsen osäker.
- toughened penalties for environmental crimesdecisive»Skärpa straffen för miljöbrott och nedskräpning och ge ordningsvakter befogenhet att dela ut böter för småskräp« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Toughen penalties for environmental crimes and littering and give bailiffs authority to issue fines for small litter”
- international environmental cooperation»Samtidigt ska vi hjälpa andra länder att minska sina utsläpp genom effektivt internationellt samarbete.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“At the same time we shall help other countries reduce their emissions through effective international cooperation.”
- democracy and human rights»Prioritera insatser som stödjer arbetet för demokrati och mänskliga rättigheter« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Prioritize efforts that support work for democracy and human rights”
- efficiency over symbolic politics»Klimatpolitiken får aldrig reduceras till dyrbar symbolpolitik eller snäv klimatnationalism.« (party programme ↗)“Climate policy must never be reduced to expensive symbolic politics or narrow climate nationalism.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wants Sweden not to go ahead with its own environmental and climate initiatives but to let evidence and Swedish competitiveness guide, and is consistently sceptical about shifting power to supranational organs.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants Sweden not to go ahead with its own environmental and climate initiatives but to let evidence and Swedish competitiveness guide, and is consistently sceptical about shifting power to supranational organs. The counter-proposal's requirement that Sweden takes the initiative to add ecocide to the international criminal law framework is exactly such an advanced position. Environmental interests shall, according to the plan, be weighed against other societal values.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill att Sverige inte går före med egna miljö- och klimatinitiativ utan låter evidens och svensk konkurrenskraft styra, och den är genomgående skeptisk till att flytta makt till överstatliga organ. Motförslagets krav att Sverige tar initiativ till att foga ekocid till det internationella brottmålsregelverket är just en sådan framskjuten position. Miljöintressen ska enligt planen vägas mot andra samhällsvärden.
- not go ahead internationallydecisive»Evidens, resultat och svensk konkurrenskraft ska styra genomförandet av klimatmål i högre utsträckning än politikers vilja att gå först och längst.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Evidence, results and Swedish competitiveness should guide the implementation of climate goals to a greater extent than politicians' desire to go first and furthest.”
- national self-determination»Stärka det nationella självbestämmandet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen national self-determination”
- Swedish interests first»Värna svenska intressen i internationella sammanhang« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Protect Swedish interests in international contexts”
- balanced environmental interests»de miljöpolitiska intressena ständigt måste vägas mot andra viktiga« (party programme ↗)“environmental interests must constantly be weighed against other important”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:UU14)
- Committee report full text (HD01UU14)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2024/25:1323 — Värnande av folkrätten av Jacob Risberg m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2024/25:1431 — Vissa Asienfrågor av Markus Wiechel m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1435 — Stöd till utsatta grupper av Rasmus Giertz m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1438 — Internationella relationer och mänskliga rättigheter av Markus Wiechel m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1441 — Ekocid som krigsbrott av Yasmine Eriksson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1471 — Europarådet av Markus Wiechel m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:167 — Skydd för kristna i världen av Magnus Jacobsson (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:169 — Stopp för hädelselagar och dödsstraff för konvertiter av Magnus Jacobsson (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:1729 — Situationen för religiösa minoriteter i Indien av Roland Utbult (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:1788 — Initiativ från Sverige till ekocidlagstiftning av Magnus Manhammar m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2024/25:2181 — Frigivning av Dawit Isaak och försvar av det fria ordet av Helén Pettersson och Fredrik Lundh Sammeli (båda S)
- Motion 2024/25:2520 — Stöd för Tibets folk av Maria Stockhaus m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2024/25:2625 — En grön feministisk utvecklings- och biståndspolitik av Janine Alm Ericson m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2024/25:2954 — En folkrörelse för klimatet av Muharrem Demirok m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2024/25:301 — Erkännande av holodomor som folkmord av Gudrun Brunegård (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:3020 — Israels ockupation av Palestina av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2024/25:3061 — Inkludering av ekocid i Romstadgan av Rebecka Le Moine m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2024/25:3106 — Utgiftsområde 7 Internationellt bistånd av Morgan Johansson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2024/25:3107 — Internationell samverkan av Morgan Johansson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2024/25:3162 — Internationellt samarbete i en utmanande tid av Kerstin Lundgren m.fl. (C)
Source: The Swedish Parliament